The New Orbits Group, 1958 – C.1962

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New Orbits Group, 1958 – C.1962 Political thought and activism Trevor Smith looks at the purpose and achievements of the New Orbits Group The New Orbits Group, 1958 – c.1962 he New Orbits Group has been little rec- Unservile State Group (an intellectual group of ognised in the histories of the modern Liberals not formally attached to the party), was TLiberal Party. In two, otherwise rela- an English don at St John’s and author of a couple tively comprehensive, accounts – David Dut- of books on Liberalism. Moore became an adviser ton, A History of the Liberal Party (2004), and Roy to Jeremy Thorpe while the latter was leader, Douglas, Liberals: A History of the Liberal Party and Mirfin became secretary-general of the UK (2005) – no reference is made to the group. Arthur branch of Liberal International; both contested Cyr, in his Liberal Politics in Britain (1988), gives it many general elections. a sentence: ‘It was during this period (late 1950s/ I had joined the LSE Liberal Society in 1955, early 1960s) that the New Orbits Group, a discus- becoming first its chair and subsequently chair of sion club of younger Liberal Party activists, began UULS in 1958. I contrived to change the title of publishing periodic essays to promote thought UULS to the Union of Liberal Students (ULS) and controversy.’ At least he gave the group a as I thought a rather loose confederal organisa- mention, even though his description was in tion would make less impact than a more unitary error: it was not ‘a club’, being run under the joint one. I had succeeded Roger Straker, a scion of the auspices of the Young Liberals and Student Liber- well-known stationery and printing family firm. als. The two chairs of these integral parts of the He later gained a senior HR director’s position Liberal Party were co-vice chairs of the group, with London Transport. In turn, I was succeeded while Frank Ware was selected a ‘neutral’ chair by David (later Lord) Lea, also from Cambridge, between the two youth organisations. In its first who later joined the Labour Party and rose to four years, the group played a not insignificant become assistant general secretary of the TUC. role within the Liberal Party, which merits being At that time chairs of both NLYL and ULS more fully recorded. were ex-officio members of the Liberal Party The 1950s were a woeful time for the party. executive. Joining it in 1958, at the age of 20, I was It was reduced to five MPs, two of whom, Don- the youngest member, Barbara Burwell being ten ald Wade in Huddersfield West and Arthur Holt years older; the next youngest was Richard Wain- in Bolton East, held their seats by courtesy of a wright then aged 40. I found membership of the Lib–Con pact in both towns. The most promis- executive a rapidly maturing experience! NLYL What did the ing likely future leader, Frank Byers, had lost his and ULS worked closely together by means of a seat in Dorset in 1951 and the party continued to joint political committee (JPC), which had been New Orbits Group be led by the ageing and heavy-drinking Clem- formed in 1957. ent Davies. The only lively parts of the party The major precipitating event for the forma- achieve? It con- were the Radical Reform Group, led by Des- tion of the group was the Liberal Party conference mond (later Lord) Banks and Manuela Sykes (who of 1958, held in Torquay. It was an organisational tributed to the regularly contested Dingle Foot, the Labour MP fiasco and it was this which prompted the JPC to for Ipswich). The RRG met in her Covent Gar- attempt remedial action. Jo Grimond, the new- modernisation of den café after closing hours; she later joined the ish leader of the Liberal Party made an excellent the party under Labour Party. speech, but it was overshadowed by the quite dis- The other radically vibrant element was to be astrous chairmanship of Sir Arthur Comyns Carr, Grimond and found among the younger members of the party. QC. A distinguished lawyer and a very active In those days, Liberal youth was divided between Liberal, he had contested no less than eleven par- showed that the two organisations: the National League of Young liamentary seats, with a brief sojourn as an MP Liberals (NLYL) and the Union of University Lib- for a year between 1923 and 1924. He had been party was capa- eral Societies (UULS). Despite this formal divi- one of the leading prosecutors at the Japanese War sion, many young graduates joined the NLYL Crimes tribunals after the Second World War. By ble of imaginative which at the time had its main territorial strength 1958, however, he was 76 years old and long past in the north-west of England. Griff (later Lord) his prime. Nevertheless, he still behaved in ways policy-making Evans was its chairman who was succeeded in that had stood him in good stead throughout his across a broad turn by Barbara Burwell and then Timothy Joyce. career. He eschewed the use of a microphone, The UULS’ main strength derived from Cam- believing that his voice was resonant enough to range of the pub- bridge University and included such luminaries be heard throughout the large hall – it was not. as George Watson, Richard Moore and Derrick Appearing Emperor Hirohito-like, he wore a lic agenda. Mirfin. Watson, who became secretary of the wing-collared shirt, black jacket and striped 12 Journal of Liberal History 95 Summer 2017 The New Orbits Group, 1958 – c.1962 trousers and thus hardly presented the modern The New Orbits Group was the name given face of Liberalism which Grimond was trying to to the old JPC. Its senior participants comprised promote. a very talented group. It included Tony Miller, 1958 was exactly one year before the next gen- Tony Stowell, Tony Lloyd, James Crossley, Griff eral election was due. The one cause for optimism Evans, Barbara Burwell, Frank Ware and Ron- had been the election of Mark Bonham-Carter in nie Fraser. Undoubtedly, the finest mind was the Torrington by-election. The JPC was galva- that of Timothy Joyce, who was completing his nised into taking a new initiative in the wake of PhD in the Moral Sciences at Cambridge. He Torrington, but even more by the disastrous han- later became a very successful businessman in the dling of the 1958 Torquay Assembly. field of market research. He ultimately became It set up study groups amongst NLYL branches chief executive of J. Walter Thompson, selling and university societies during the autumn of the firm at a high price and buying it back at a 1958. The results of these were analysed and sum- low one, thereby making a personal fortune. He marised and brought together in a substantial had suffered from polio as a child which contrib- booklet of some seventy pages called New Orbits. uted to his all too premature death. Frank Ware, I had suggested the title as it reflected the main at the time, was the youthful head of the Liberal event of the time, which was the successful Soviet Party research department where he was assisted sputnik circumnavigation of the globe that was by James Crossley (who also died prematurely) soon to lead to Yuri Gagarin’s first human ven- and Peter Landell-Mills, who later founded a ture into space. The title sought, in a more modest successful agricultural economics international way, to capture a similar sense of experiment and consultancy firm. Another member was Sarah excitement within the Liberal Party. Myers, had been very active in the UULS while at The pamphlet was presented for discussion Oxford and later became a journalist on the Times and endorsement to what we called the Opera- Educational Supplement. tion Manifesto Congress in Manchester on 18 and A number of quite original policy papers were 19 April 1959, just five months before the general published as pamphlets in the subsequent next election in the following September. two years. The first was calledHigh Time for Rad- Manchester was a resounding success. It icals and was a collective essay by eight leading attracted many Young and Student Liberals and, members of the New Orbits Group; again, I had indeed, was addressed by Jo Grimond himself. suggested the title. It touched on a number of Anthony Howard, then a junior reporter and edi- themes, both of a policy kind and about how to torial leader writer at the Manchester Guardian, improve the professionalism of the party itself. Its was sent to cover the Congress. An ardent Labour sub-title, ‘A Discussion on the Future of the Left’, supporter and not in any sense a natural Liberal indicated that the group sought to be left of centre (he was later to become editor of the New States- in its orientation. There followed some ten pam- man), he nevertheless wrote an admiring leader and phlets on a wide variety of subjects, including: report of the congress in the newspaper, then edi- the Central African Federation; the role of trade torially committed to the aims of the Liberal Party. and aid in the world, to which John Williamson Jo Grimond (Leader of the Liberal Party, 1956–67) with Eric Lubbock, winner of the Orpington by-election in 1962 Journal of Liberal History 95 Summer 2017 13 The New Orbits Group, 1958 – c.1962 The advent of contributed (he was to become a leading inter- cricket team coming to Britain. He later became national economist); 5 Year Plan by Frank Ware; Labour MP for Neath, a cabinet minister and then the New Orbits New Unions for Old, dealing with the reform of the a life peer.
Recommended publications
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J
    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell
    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Devolution Tony Little Examines the Lessons from the First Home Rule Bill of 1886
    The Evolution of Devolution Tony Little examines the lessons from the first Home Rule Bill of 1886 Devolving power has been Liberal Democrat philosophy politics, not even the devastating Irish famine, until Parnell for so long that it has become an instinctive reaction to became leader of the nationalist movement. solving community problems. Gladstone’s contribution to The nineteenth century Irish electoral system mirrored the development of this philosophy and his efforts to apply that of Britain, usually with a delay in reforms crossing the it to Ireland through a Home Rule Bill still have lessons for Irish Sea. Corruption and violence were more pronounced today, not only for the Irish peace process but also for a but then they were not uncommon in England. Despite Scottish parliament. intimidation, on balance voters followed self interest within the existing system rather than revolutionary ideals. Through The Home Rule Plan an attractive agrarian programme, Parnell combined this economic interest with a denominational identity and When looking at the Home Rule Bill, we should constitutional pressure towards nationalism. At home, remember that neither Ireland nor England enjoyed local Parnell mobilised popular forces in the Land League, government as we know it today. County councils were inventing the boycott as an effective peaceful campaign tactic not established until . Gladstone sketched the essence while maintaining ambiguous links with militant Fenian of his bill on a single sheet of paper at Lord Rosebery’s groups. In Westminster, he perfected parliamentary home in November . For the details he drew upon the obstruction to keep Irish grievances in the headlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Politics
    the Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson Department of Politics University of Sussex Brighton, United Kingdom ISBN 978-1-137-50661-0 ISBN 978-1-137-50664-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-50664-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016963256 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • RADICAL REFORM GROUP the Radical Reform Group Has Until Recently Been Relatively Neglected by Historians of the Liberal Party
    RADICAL REfORm GROuP The Radical Reform Group has until recently been relatively neglected by historians of the Liberal Party. Graham Lippiatt gives an overview of the group’s formation and history, examines the material published by the group itself and reviews the published literature which covers it. he Radical Reform its own, policies which will both the News Chronicle entitled ‘Left or Group (RRG) was a give effect to the principles [of Limbo?’. It called the earlier deci- social liberal pressure liberty and social justice] and gain sion to divorce from the party a group of the 1950s and wide acceptance from all shades mistake, criticising the RRG for 1960s. It was founded of political opinion.’10 The RRG’s having been dormant too long Tin 19521 by Desmond Banks2 and intention was to create an effective and looked forward to its renewed Peter Grafton.3 Concerned that, third force in British politics and activities on the left of centre, under the leadership of Clement looked for ways of forging links where it said ‘all good Liberals Davies, the Liberal Party was fall- with like-minded individuals in should be’.17 ing unduly under the sway of clas- other parties. Banks also gave as Thereafter the RRG contin- sical, free-market liberals and was a justification for the formation of ued its role as an internal social drifting to the right, they feared the RRG the need to strengthen liberal ginger group, supportive of the domination of the party by the Liberal Party as an alternative Jo Grimond’s electoral strategy of economic liberals such as Oliver for disillusioned electors against realignment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forgotten Lib–Con Alliance
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 79 / Summer 2013 / £6.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y A forgotten Lib–Con alliance Alun Wyburn-Powell The Constitutionalists and the 1924 election A new party or a worthless coupon? David Dutton ‘A nasty, deplorable little incident in our political life’ The Dumfries Standard, 1957 David Cloke David Lloyd George: the legacy Meeting report James Fargher The South African war and its effect on the Liberal alliance Kenneth O. Morgan The relevance of Henry Richard The ‘apostle of peace’ Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 79 Summer 2013 Journal of Liberal History Issue 79: Summer 2013 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Liberal history news 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Lloyd George commemorations; plaque to Lord john Russell; Gladstone statue Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl unveiled in Seaforth Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini A forgotten Liberal–Conservative alliance 6 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, The Constitutionalists and the 1924 election – a new party or a worthless York Membery coupon? by Alun Wyburn-Powell Patrons Letters to the Editor 15 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Honor Balfour (Michael Meadowcroft and Hugh Pagan) Professor John Vincent Editorial Board Liberal history quiz 2012 15 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Ian Cawood; Matt Cole; Dr Roy The answers (questions in issue 78) Douglas; Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr ‘A nasty, deplorable little incident in our political 16 Alison Holmes; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE PROVISION for SOCIAL NEED: SERIES TWO: Parts 3 and 4
    STATE PROVISION FOR SOCIAL NEED: SERIES TWO: Parts 3 and 4 STATE PROVISION FOR SOCIAL NEED: Series Two: The Beveridge Papers from the British Library of Political and Economic Science Part 3: Correspondence and Papers on Health Services, Old Age, Pensions, New Towns and Post-War Europe, 1919-1962 Part 4: Reports and Working Papers on Coal, Unemployment, Food Rationing, Manpower, Fuel, and Social Insurance, 1925-1962 Contents listing PUBLISHER'S NOTE - PART 3 TECHNICAL NOTE CONTENTS OF REELS - PART 3 PUBLISHER'S NOTE - PART 4 CONTENTS OF REELS - PART 4 STATE PROV SOC NEED: SERIES TWO: Parts 3 and 4 Publisher's Note - Part 3 In Series Two of this microfilm project we cover Sections III, IV, VI, VII and VIII of the William Henry Beveridge Papers from the British Library of Political and Economic Science. This project covers just those Sections of subject files with a strong bearing on the Welfare State, the Beveridge Report, Social Insurance, Health, Pensions and Economic Planning after 1945. Other Sections, principally the major runs of correspondence and other material still restricted by copyright are not covered here. The subject files in this microfilm project are made available as follows: Part 1: Early Working Papers on Welfare, Labour and Unemployment Insurance, 1902-1944 (Sections III and IV) Part 2: Politics, Economic Planning, Social Insurance, Health and the Welfare State, 1944-1963 (Section VI) Part 3: Correspondence and Papers on Health Services, Old Age, Pensions, New Towns and Post-War Europe, 1919- 1962 (Section VII) Part 4: Reports and Working Papers on Coal, Unemployment, Food Rationing, Manpower, Fuel and Social Insurance, 1925-1961 (Section VIII) Re-examining the Welfare State in detail has become a major preoccupation of modern day governments in the late 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic and International Trials, 1700–2000
    Domestic and international trials, 1700–2000 Domestic and international trials, 1700–2000 The trial in history, volume II edited by R. A. Melikan Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2003 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors, and no chapter may be reproduced wholly or in part without the express permission in writing of both author and publisher. Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk Distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA Distributed exclusively in Canada by UBC Press, University of British Columbia, 2029 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 0 7190 6486 4 hardback First published 2003 1009080706050403 10987654321 Typeset in Photina by Graphicraft Limited, Hong Kong Printed in Great Britain by Bookcraft (Bath) Ltd, Midsomer Norton iv Contents List of figures and tables page vi List of contributors vii Acknowledgements ix List of legal abbreviations x Introduction R. A. Melikan 1 1 Evidence law and the evidentiary objection: a view from the British Trials collection T. P. Gallanis 12 2 Sense and sensibility: fateful splitting in the Victorian insanity trial Joel Peter Eigen 21 3 Trials of character: the use of character evidence in Victorian sodomy trials H.
    [Show full text]
  • 67 Summer 2010
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 67 / Summer 2010 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals and the left Matthew Roberts Out of Chartism, into Liberalism Popular radicals and the Liberal Party Michael Freeden The Liberal Party and the New Liberalism John Shepherd The flight from the Liberal PartyLiberals who joined Labour, 1914–31 Matt Cole ‘An out-of-date word’ Jo Grimond and the left Peter Hellyer The Young Liberals and the left, 1965–70 Liberal Democrat History Group Liberal Leaders The latest publication from the Liberal Democrat History Group is Liberal Leaders: Leaders of the Liberal Party, SDP and Liberal Democrats since 1900. The sixty-page booklet contains concise biographies of every Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat leader since 1900. The total of sixteen biographies stretches from Henry Campbell-Bannerman to Nick Clegg, including such figures as H. H. Asquith, David Lloyd George, Jo Grimond, David Steel, David Owen and Paddy Ashdown. Liberal Leaders is available to Journal of Liberal History subscribers for the special price of £5 (normal price £6) with free p&p. To order, please send a cheque for £5.00 (made out to ‘Liberal Democrat History Group’) to LDHG, 38 Salford Road, London SW2 4BQ. RESEARCH IN PROGRESS If you can help any of the individuals listed below with sources, contacts, or any other information — or if you know anyone who can — please pass on details to them. Details of other research projects in progress should be sent to the Editor (see page 3) for inclusion here.
    [Show full text]
  • 41 Winter 2003.Indd
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 41 / Winter 2003 / £5.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y The Fall of the Lloyd George Coalition Meeting report Margaret Macmillan, Andrew Thorpe, John Barnes, Stuart Ball Andrew Hudson The history of the Lib-Labs Labour interests within the Liberal Party Jaime Reynolds and Robert Ingham Archie Macdonald MP for Roxburgh and Selkirk, 1950–51: biography Jürgen Frölich The German Liberals Between third force and marginal force Adrian Slade ‘Hard man’ with heart Interview with Bill Rodgers Liberal Democrat History Group Oral history Interviewers needed We would like to hear from nother new, but related, anyone willing to volunteer HISTORY History Group project some time to interview a Ais a new publication: small number of key Liberal an Oral History of twenti- (or SDP or Liberal Demo- eth century Liberalism – a crat) activists about their thematic study of the Liberal period in the party, and their GROUP NEWS Party and liberalism, drawing experience in particular areas upon interviews with Lib- (campaigning, for example, eral activists and politicians, or policy-making, or party Contribute to Whatever your experi- as well as autobiographical organisation). ence, you are welcome to sources. Liberal Democrat Guidance will be given contribute. If you have or Many of the necessary with questions and interview history know of party records or interviews have already been techniques. other documentary material conducted, for other pur- If you are able to help, he Liberal Democrat that might be of historical poses (such as PhD theses), please write to Robert Ing- History Group is aiming interest please give us details.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic and International Trials, 1700-2000
    Domestic and international trials, 1700–2000 Domestic and international trials, 1700–2000 The trial in history, volume II edited by R. A. Melikan Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Manchester University Press 2003 While copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in Manchester University Press, copyright in individual chapters belongs to their respective authors. This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC- ND) licence, which permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction provided the author(s) and Manchester University Press are fully cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. Details of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 0 7190 6486 4 hardback First published 2003 1009080706050403 10987654321 Typeset in Photina by Graphicraft Limited, Hong Kong Printed in Great Britain by Bookcraft (Bath) Ltd, Midsomer Norton iv Contents List of figures and tables page vi List of contributors vii Acknowledgements ix List of legal abbreviations x Introduction R. A. Melikan 1 1 Evidence law and the evidentiary objection: a view from the British Trials collection T. P. Gallanis 12 2 Sense and sensibility: fateful splitting in the Victorian insanity trial Joel Peter Eigen 21 3 Trials of character: the use of character evidence in Victorian sodomy trials H.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Post-War By-Elections the Inverness Turning Point
    LIBERAL POST-WAR BY-ELECTIONS THE INVERNESS TURNING POINT The by-election HE 1951 election is widely broad front of 475 in 1950, inevi- accepted as the low point tably meant a drastic reduction victories at Torrington in Liberal general elec- in the total number of votes in 1958 and Orpington tion performance. It cast for the party. The Liberals’ saw the party’s lowest share of the vote collapsed to in 1962 confirmed Tshare of the total vote, lowest 2.5 per cent, down from 9.1 per that the Liberal Party’s number of candidates and a fall cent in 1950. The party polled in the number of MPs elected only 730,556 votes, compared to recovery from its to its lowest level at a general 2,621,548 in 1950. election.1 At the following gen- The most high-profile casu- low point of the 1951 eral election in 1955 the average alty among the Liberal MPs at general election – only share of the vote per Liberal the 1951 election was the party’s candidate increased slightly, to Deputy Leader, Megan Lloyd about a hundrded 15.1 per cent from 14.7 per cent. George, who lost Anglesey to candidates, only six Fewer deposits were lost in 1955, Labour by 595 votes, after hav- despite an increase of one in ing represented the constitu- of whom were elected the number of candidates. All ency without a break since 1929. – was under way. But six Liberal MPs who fought the Emrys Roberts lost Merioneth, 1955 election were returned – the also to Labour.
    [Show full text]