DOCSLIB.ORG

Progressive Politics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progressive Politics the Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson Department of Politics University of Sussex Brighton, United Kingdom ISBN 978-1-137-50661-0 ISBN 978-1-137-50664-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-50664-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016963256 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Cover Image: © maxstock / Alamy Stock Photo Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Macmillan Publishers Ltd. The registered company address is: The Campus, 4 Crinan Street, London, N1 9XW, United Kingdom For Jon, at the start of a new chapter This book traces the word ‘progressive’ through modern British history, from the Enlightenment to Brexit. It explores the shifting meanings of this term and the contradictory political projects to which it has been attached. It also places this political language in its cultural context, asking how it relates to ideas about progressive social development, progressive business, and progressive rock music. ‘Progressive’ is often associated with a centre-left political tradition, but this book shows that this was only ever one use of the term—and one that was heavily contested even from its inception. The power of the term ‘progressive’ is that it appears to anticipate the future. This can be politically and culturally valuable, but it is also dangerous. The suggestion that there is only one way forward has led to fear and doubt, anger and apathy, even amongst those who would like to consider themselves ‘progressive people’. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I began this book during a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of East Anglia (UEA), carried out much of the research as an Advance Research Fellow in the School of Politics and International Relations at the University of Nottingham, and completed it as a Lecturer in Politics at the University of Sussex. I have been exceptionally well supported in each of these positions, and would like to thank all those who have acted as mentors along the way, particularly John Greenaway at UEA, Steve Fielding and Michael Freeden at Nottingham, and Claire Annesley and Paul Taggart at Sussex. All of them have gone far beyond the call of duty, and I am profoundly grateful to them. I am also lucky to have had won- derful colleagues at each of these institutions. I would like to thank the anonymous reviewer and all those who read and commented on chapters: Hester Barron, Lawrence Black, Chris Brooke, Jon Croker, Kate Dommett, Cathy Elliott, Rhodri Hayward, Ben Jackson, Mike Kenny, Pete Kerr, Jim Martin, Charlotte Riley, Camilla Schofield, Julia Stapleton, Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, Julian Wright, and Matt Worley. Their comments were immensely helpful and greatly improved the text. It goes without saying that they are not responsible for any remaining errors. In the six years since I began this research, I have benefitted from too many productive discussions, useful suggestions and insightful questions to acknowledge here, so, in addition to those listed above, I will simply mention Judi Atkins, Angela Bartie, Victoria Browne, Valentina Cardo, Gidon Cohen, Marcus Collins, Phil Cowley, Thomas Dixon, Elizabeth Evans, Alan Finlayson, Matthew Francis, Keith Gildart, Richard Grayson, ix x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Claire Langhamer, Jon Lawrence, Peter Mandler, Andrew Perchard, Lucy Robinson, and Natalie Thomlinson. I am particularly grateful to every- one who participated in the 2012 conference on ‘Progressivism: Past and Present’, and especially those who contributed to the subsequent special issue of Political Studies Review: David Blaazer, Michael Freeden, Simon Griffiths, Robert Page, Peter Sloman and Joe Twyman. The editorial work of Rene Bailey and Mark Wenman in seeing this to completion was invaluable. One of the pleasures of the past three years has been teaching at Sussex. I have been continually inspired and challenged by the enthusiasm of stu- dents. In particular, I would like to thank those who have taken my spe- cial subject on Ideas of Progress and Decline in Modern British Politics. Your dissertations have been a joy to read and pushed me to think about these questions from many different (and sometimes surprising) angles. Jake Watts’ doctoral research has given me a new perspective on tem- poral positioning within the Labour Party. And a final thank-you is due to all those who have helped to make Politics Wednesdays such a high- light of each week. Another recent pleasure has been spending time with Camilla Schofield, Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite and Natalie Thomlinson, rethinking the history and politics of the 1970s. The ideas we have dis- cussed together have shaped this book in innumerable ways. The Labour Party Archive, Conservative Party Archive Trust, Special Collections at the University of Bristol Arts and Social Sciences Library, Curtis Brown on behalf of the Trustees of the Mass Observation Archive, Trustees of the Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives, and Sheffield Archives have kindly granted permission for quotations from archival sources. Andrew Riley at the Churchill Archives Centre was helpful, as always. An earlier version of Chap. 3 appeared as ‘Defining Progressive Politics: Municipal Socialism and Anti-Socialism in Contestation, 1889–1939’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 76:4 (2015), and sections of Chap. 7 were originally published as ‘Speaking at Cross Purposes? The Rhetorical Problems of “Progressive” Politics’, Political Studies Review 12:1 (2014), co-authored with Joe Twyman. I am grateful to the University of Pennsylvania Press and to Sage for permission to reproduce these pieces here, and to Joe Twyman for permission to use sections of our co-authored article, and particularly for producing the YouGov survey on which it was based. Emily Russell, Carmel Kennedy, Rowan Milligan, Angharad Bishop and Clare Mence at Palgrave have all been helpful and (perhaps more importantly) patient throughout the process. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xi My family and friends have been understanding and tolerant through all my enthusiasms and crises—particularly my wonderful parents. I am sorry if the writing sometimes seemed to take priority over everything else. The book is dedicated to Jon Croker, who has (once again) inspired me with the energy with which he approaches his own work, while also showing great care and attention to mine. This has been particularly valu- able over the past few months, and I am thankful for all the ways in which he has created the space and time I needed. Finally, I owe a special debt to Wilbur Robinson Croker, whose increasingly insistent wriggling finally forced me to finish writing. Brighton, July 2016 CONTENTS 1 Introduction: Being Progressive 1 2 Two Natural and Inevitable Parties? 25 3 Municipal Enterprise: Contesting the Liberal Tradition 67 4 The Pageant of Parliament: Politics in the Time of Modernism 107 5 Puzzled People: Making Sense of Modernity 157 6 Party Games: Realignments and Revisionism 201 7 The Rhetoric of Change: Modernisation and Its Discontents 241 8 Conclusion: The Consequences of Progressive Thinking 285 Index 291 xiii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AIPWA All India Progressive Writers’ Association BUF British Union of Fascists BW British Weekly CND Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament CPA Conservative Party Archive CPGB Communist Party of Great Britain DM Daily Mail ELP Emerson, Lake and Palmer EU European Union FPSI Federation of Progressive Societies and Individuals GH Glasgow Herald ILN Illustrated London News ILP Independent Labour Party LCC London County Council LPP Labour Party Papers MG Manchester Guardian MT Marxism Today NBM New Britain Movement NEG New Europe Group NLC National Liberal Club PP Picture Post SA Sheffield Archives SCGPP Sheffield Citizens’ Group & Progressive Party SCUA Scottish Conservative and Unionist Association SDF Social Democratic Federation SDP Social Democratic Party SNP Scottish National Party xv xvi LIST OF Abbreviations UKIP United Kingdom Independence Party USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics CHAPTER 1 Introduction: Being Progressive What does it mean to be progressive? Does it entail a set of recognisable political commitments, or a series of cultural assumptions? Is it a philo- sophical outlook, an active stance or even a personality trait? What about the claim to be progressive? What does that involve? And, more impor- tantly, what does it do? What does it make possible? And what does it preclude? There are three aspects to this discussion, which I want to examine in turn. First, the politics. How has the term ‘progressive’ functioned in British political discourse? What roles has it played and what effects has it had? Second, the temporal nature of the term.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Meaning of Conservatism Free
    FREE THE MEANING OF CONSERVATISM PDF Roger Scruton | 220 pages | 26 Nov 2012 | St. Augustine's Press | 9781587315039 | English | South Bend, Indiana, United States The Meaning of Conservatism | Roger Scruton | Palgrave Macmillan The Meaning of Conservatism. Roger Scruton. First published inThe Meaning of Conservatism is now recognized as a major contribution to political thought, and the liveliest and most provocative modern statement of the traditional "paleo-conservative" position. Roger Scruton challenges those who would regard themselves as conservatives, and also their opponents. Conservatism, he argues, has little in common with liberalism, and is only tenuously related to the market economy, to monetarism, to free enterprise, or to capitalism. The Meaning of Conservatism involves neither hostility toward the state, nor the desire to limit the state's obligation toward the citizen. Its conceptions of society, law, and citizenship regard the individual not The Meaning of Conservatism the premise but as the conclusion of politics. At the same time it is fundamentally opposed to the ethic of social justice, to equality of station, opportunity, income, and achievement, and to the attempt to bring major institutions of society - such as schools and universities - under government control. Authority and Allegiance. Constitution and the State. The Conservative Attitude. The Meaning of Conservatism | SpringerLink Conservatism is a political and social philosophy promoting traditional social institutions in the context of culture and civilization. The central tenets of conservatism include traditionhierarchyand authorityas established in respective cultures, as well as property rights. Historically associated with right-wing politicsthe term has since been used to describe a wide range of views.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Stephen Harper
    HARPER Edited by Teresa Healy www.policyalternatives.ca Photo: Hanson/THE Tom CANADIAN PRESS Understanding Stephen Harper The long view Steve Patten CANAdIANs Need to understand the political and ideological tem- perament of politicians like Stephen Harper — men and women who aspire to political leadership. While we can gain important insights by reviewing the Harper gov- ernment’s policies and record since the 2006 election, it is also essential that we step back and take a longer view, considering Stephen Harper’s two decades of political involvement prior to winning the country’s highest political office. What does Harper’s long record of engagement in conservative politics tell us about his political character? This chapter is organized around a series of questions about Stephen Harper’s political and ideological character. Is he really, as his support- ers claim, “the smartest guy in the room”? To what extent is he a con- servative ideologue versus being a political pragmatist? What type of conservatism does he embrace? What does the company he keeps tell us about his political character? I will argue that Stephen Harper is an economic conservative whose early political motivations were deeply ideological. While his keen sense of strategic pragmatism has allowed him to make peace with both conservative populism and the tradition- alism of social conservatism, he continues to marginalize red toryism within the Canadian conservative family. He surrounds himself with Governance 25 like-minded conservatives and retains a long-held desire to transform Canada in his conservative image. The smartest guy in the room, or the most strategic? When Stephen Harper first came to the attention of political observers, it was as one of the leading “thinkers” behind the fledgling Reform Party of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • 13273 PSA Conf Programme 2011 PRINT
    Transforming Politics: New Synergies 61st Annual International Conference 18 – 21 April 2011 Novotel London West, London, UK PSA 61st Annual International Conference London, 18 –21 April 2011 www.psa.ac.uk/2011 A Word of Welcome Dear Conference delegate You are extremely welcome to this 61st Conference of the Political Studies Association, held in the UK capital. The recently refurbished Hammersmith Novotel hotel offers high quality conference facilities all under one roof. We are expecting well over 500 delegates, representing over 50 different countries. There are more than 190 panels, as well as the workshops on Monday, building on last year’s innovation, and as a new addition, dedicated posters sessions. There are also three receptions. The Conference theme is ‘Transforming Politics: New Synergies’. Keynote speakers include Professor Carole Pateman, President of APSA, revisiting the concept of participatory democracy and Professor Iain McLean giving the Government and Opposition-sponsored Leonard Schapiro lecture on the subject of coalition and minority government. On Wednesday, our after-dinner speaker is Professor Tony Wright, (UCL and Birkbeck College) former MP and Chair of the Public Administration Select Committee. Amongst other highlights, Professor Vicente Palermo will discuss Anglo-Argentine relations and John Denham MP will talk on ‘English questions’ and the Labour Party’ and Sir Michael Aaronson, former Director General of Save the Children, will be drawing on his experience working in crisis situations to reflect on whether we had a choice in Libya today. Despite the worsening economic and policy environment, this has been a particularly active and successful year for the Association. Overall membership figures, including those for the new Teachers’ Section, continue to rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J
    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • OPENING PANDORA's BOX David Cameron's Referendum Gamble On
    OPENING PANDORA’S BOX David Cameron’s Referendum Gamble on EU Membership Credit: The Economist. By Christina Hull Yale University Department of Political Science Adviser: Jolyon Howorth April 21, 2014 Abstract This essay examines the driving factors behind UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s decision to call a referendum if the Conservative Party is re-elected in 2015. It addresses the persistence of Euroskepticism in the United Kingdom and the tendency of Euroskeptics to generate intra-party conflict that often has dire consequences for Prime Ministers. Through an analysis of the relative impact of political strategy, the power of the media, and British public opinion, the essay argues that addressing party management and electoral concerns has been the primary influence on David Cameron’s decision and contends that Cameron has unwittingly unleashed a Pandora’s box that could pave the way for a British exit from the European Union. Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank the Bates Summer Research Fellowship, without which I would not have had the opportunity to complete my research in London. To Professor Peter Swenson and the members of The Senior Colloquium, Gabe Botelho, Josh Kalla, Gabe Levine, Mary Shi, and Joel Sircus, who provided excellent advice and criticism. To Professor David Cameron, without whom I never would have discovered my interest in European politics. To David Fayngor, who flew halfway across the world to keep me company during my summer research. To my mom for her unwavering support and my dad for his careful proofreading. And finally, to my adviser Professor Jolyon Howorth, who worked with me on this project for over a year and a half.
    [Show full text]
  • Tory Modernisation 2.0 Tory Modernisation
    Edited by Ryan Shorthouse and Guy Stagg Guy and Shorthouse Ryan by Edited TORY MODERNISATION 2.0 MODERNISATION TORY edited by Ryan Shorthouse and Guy Stagg TORY MODERNISATION 2.0 THE FUTURE OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY TORY MODERNISATION 2.0 The future of the Conservative Party Edited by Ryan Shorthouse and Guy Stagg The moral right of the authors has been asserted. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a re- trieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. Bright Blue is an independent, not-for-profit organisation which cam- paigns for the Conservative Party to implement liberal and progressive policies that draw on Conservative traditions of community, entre- preneurialism, responsibility, liberty and fairness. First published in Great Britain in 2013 by Bright Blue Campaign www.brightblue.org.uk ISBN: 978-1-911128-00-7 Copyright © Bright Blue Campaign, 2013 Printed and bound by DG3 Designed by Soapbox, www.soapbox.co.uk Contents Acknowledgements 1 Foreword 2 Rt Hon Francis Maude MP Introduction 5 Ryan Shorthouse and Guy Stagg 1 Last chance saloon 12 The history and future of Tory modernisation Matthew d’Ancona 2 Beyond bare-earth Conservatism 25 The future of the British economy Rt Hon David Willetts MP 3 What’s wrong with the Tory party? 36 And why hasn’t
    [Show full text]
  • Outsiders' Music: Progressive Country, Reggae
    CHAPTER TWELVE: OUTSIDERS’ MUSIC: PROGRESSIVE COUNTRY, REGGAE, SALSA, PUNK, FUNK, AND RAP, 1970s Chapter Outline I. The Outlaws: Progressive Country Music A. During the late 1960s and early 1970s, mainstream country music was dominated by: 1. the slick Nashville sound, 2. hardcore country (Merle Haggard), and 3. blends of country and pop promoted on AM radio. B. A new generation of country artists was embracing music and attitudes that grew out of the 1960s counterculture; this movement was called progressive country. 1. Inspired by honky-tonk and rockabilly mix of Bakersfield country music, singer-songwriters (Bob Dylan), and country rock (Gram Parsons) 2. Progressive country performers wrote songs that were more intellectual and liberal in outlook than their contemporaries’ songs. 3. Artists were more concerned with testing the limits of the country music tradition than with scoring hits. 4. The movement’s key artists included CHAPTER TWELVE: OUTSIDERS’ MUSIC: PROGRESSIVE COUNTRY, REGGAE, SALSA, PUNK, FUNK, AND RAP, 1970s a) Willie Nelson, b) Kris Kristopherson, c) Tom T. Hall, and d) Townes Van Zandt. 5. These artists were not polished singers by conventional standards, but they wrote distinctive, individualist songs and had compelling voices. 6. They developed a cult following, and progressive country began to inch its way into the mainstream (usually in the form of cover versions). a) “Harper Valley PTA” (1) Original by Tom T. Hall (2) Cover version by Jeannie C. Riley; Number One pop and country (1968) b) “Help Me Make It through the Night” (1) Original by Kris Kristofferson (2) Cover version by Sammi Smith (1971) C.
    [Show full text]
  • 400306 Ki0eso38uvhuvcwtb
    FOREWORD 10x10 brings together 100 of 10x10 was founded in one of the the world’s best architects and world’s great financial centres; the artists into the most famous city City of London. Its aim is to raise in the world, the City of London, money for essential projects in to draw at their own expense for developing countries. Article 25. The City is one square It began as a celebration of mile and every corner contains three things: firstly, the process two thousand years of great of looking at the city; stopping, architecture. From Wren to Foster, listening and putting pen to from Soane to Koolhaas the City paper. Secondly, the process of has exquisite buildings and spaces making choices; deciding what which have, in turn been captured to draw - picking favourites – and by today’s best talent. articulating those choices. Thirdly Article 25 thanks the participants it is a celebration both of the of 10x10 for their generosity and individual and the collective - a now asks you to match their spirit many-layered ‘snapshot’ of the by digging deep and bidding high. City. Here’s your chance to secure a Thanks go to all those who have piece of history, for a very good contributed; with drawings, with cause. Article 25 is the UK’s their time and with sponsorship. leading architectural humanitarian We hope that this will be the first charity - we need your support. of many 10x10’s, both in London and in other cities around the World. Jack Pringle Tim Makower Chair of Article 25 Allies and Morrison LONDON 10 X 10 “10x10 London – Drawing the City” DRAWING THE CITY is a unique project, dividing the City of London into a 10x10 grid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservative Agenda for Constitutional Reform
    UCL DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Constitution Unit Department of Political Science UniversityThe Constitution College London Unit 29–30 Tavistock Square London WC1H 9QU phone: 020 7679 4977 fax: 020 7679 4978 The Conservative email: [email protected] www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit A genda for Constitutional The Constitution Unit at UCL is the UK’s foremost independent research body on constitutional change. It is part of the UCL School of Public Policy. THE CONSERVATIVE Robert Hazell founded the Constitution Unit in 1995 to do detailed research and planning on constitutional reform in the UK. The Unit has done work on every aspect AGENDA of the UK’s constitutional reform programme: devolution in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the English regions, reform of the House of Lords, electoral reform, R parliamentary reform, the new Supreme Court, the conduct of referendums, freedom eform Prof FOR CONSTITUTIONAL of information, the Human Rights Act. The Unit is the only body in the UK to cover the whole of the constitutional reform agenda. REFORM The Unit conducts academic research on current or future policy issues, often in collaboration with other universities and partners from overseas. We organise regular R programmes of seminars and conferences. We do consultancy work for government obert and other public bodies. We act as special advisers to government departments and H parliamentary committees. We work closely with government, parliament and the azell judiciary. All our work has a sharply practical focus, is concise and clearly written, timely and relevant to policy makers and practitioners. The Unit has always been multi disciplinary, with academic researchers drawn mainly from politics and law.
    [Show full text]
  • Waylon Jennings
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Introduction 4 About the Guide 5 Pre and Post-Lesson: Anticipation Guide 6 Lesson 1: Introduction to Outlaws 7 Lesson 1: Worksheet 8 Lyric Sheet: Me and Paul 9 Lesson 2: Who Were The Outlaws? 10 Lesson 3: Outlaw Influence 11 Lesson 3: Worksheet 12 Activities: Jigsaw Texts 14 Lyric Sheet: Are You Sure Hank Done It This Way 15 Lesson 4: T for Texas, T for Tennessee 16 Lesson 4: Worksheet 17 Lesson 5: Literary Lyrics 19 “London” by William Blake 20 Complete Tennessee Standards 22 Complete Texas Standards 23 Biographies 3-6 Table of Contents 2 Outlaws and Armadillos: Country’s Roaring ‘70s examines how the Outlaw movement greatly enlarged country music’s audience during the 1970s. Led by pacesetters such as Willie Nelson, Waylon Jennings, Kris Kristofferson, and Bobby Bare, artists in Nashville and Austin demanded the creative freedom to make their own country music, different from the pop-oriented sound that prevailed at the time. This exhibition also examines the cultures of Nashville and fiercely independent Austin, and the complicated, surprising relationships between the two. Artwork by Sam Yeates, Rising from the Ashes, Willie Takes Flight for Austin (2017) 3-6 Introduction 3 This interdisciplinary lesson guide allows classrooms to explore the exhibition Outlaws and Armadillos: Country’s Roaring ‘70s on view at the Country Music Hall of Fame and Museum® from May 25, 2018 – February 14, 2021. Students will examine the causes and effects of the Outlaw movement through analysis of art, music, video, and nonfiction texts. In doing so, students will gain an understanding of the culture of this movement; who and what influenced it; and how these changes diversified country music’s audience during this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals in Coalition
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 72 / Autumn 2011 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals in coalition Vernon Bogdanor Riding the tiger The Liberal experience of coalition government Ian Cawood A ‘distinction without a difference’? Liberal Unionists and Conservatives Kenneth O. Morgan Liberals in coalition, 1916–1922 David Dutton Liberalism and the National Government, 1931–1940 Matt Cole ‘Be careful what you wish for’ Lessons of the Lib–Lab Pact Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 new book from tHe History Group for details, see back page Journal of Liberal History issue 72: Autumn 2011 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Riding the tiger: the Liberal experience of 4 Editor: Duncan Brack coalition government Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Vernon Bogdanor introduces this special issue of the Journal Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Coalition before 1886 10 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, York Membery Whigs, Peelites and Liberals: Angus Hawkins examines coalitions before 1886 Patrons A ‘distinction without a difference’? 14 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Ian Cawood analyses how the Liberal Unionists maintained a distinctive Professor John Vincent identity from their Conservative allies, until coalition in 1895 Editorial Board The coalition of 1915–1916 26 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Prelude to disaster: Ian Packer examines the Asquith coalition of 1915–16, Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard which brought to an end the last solely Liberal government Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]