DOCSLIB.ORG

Thecoalition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event. It not only brought an end the run up to the election on 6 May 2010. to thirteen years of Labour government, but Andrew Adonis then offers his own reflections marked a significant departure from standard on the scenarios that confronted the parties practice in a political system that has since 1945 the following day. Thomas Otte examines been synonymous with single-party government. historical precedents for the coalition, and Bernard Donoughue reflects on his experience The articles that follow are based on the as a political adviser during the Lib-Lab pact. presentations made by the authors at a Experience of coalition government within the conference on 29-30 June 2011 organized UK, but outside Westminster, is discussed by by the School of Political, Social and Jack McConnell, who reflects on leading two International Studies at the University of coalitions as First Minister in Scotland, and East Anglia in partnership with the Institute Chris Game, who offers an overview of for Government, which very kindly hosted coalitions of varying complexion in English the event at its comfortable premises at local government in recent years. Chris Hanretty 2 Carlton Gardens, and the Mile End Group considers what some of the different theories at Queen Mary, University of London. of coalition predict for the future of the The two days offered a rare opportunity for Conservative-Lib Dem coalition. Robert Hazell politicians, journalists, and academics to discuss and Ben Yong discuss how the coalition works and debate some of the questions posed by the in Whitehall, while Philip Cowley and Mark coalition. Among the themes addressed were: Stuart look at the two parties at Westminster. the lessons, if any, that can be drawn from the How the coalition is seen by ordinary party experiences in the UK of pre-1945 coalitions, members is considered by Iain Dale the Lib-Lab pact of 1977-78, and devolved or (Conservatives) and David Hall-Matthews sub-national government; how the coalition in (Lib Dems), while Nick Pearce discusses how the UK compares in its formation and dynamics the prospects of coalition were viewed within with coalition government elsewhere in Europe, Labour. Finally, Adam Boulton, David Cowling, and whether the UK experience is captured by and Nick Anstead examine media coverage of academic theories of coalition formation; the voter intentions, the election campaign, and the impact of the coalition on the machinery of possibility, and later the actuality of, coalition government, and on parliamentary procedures, government. Arguing that the 2010 election was processes and norms; how the coalition is a watershed, Boulton highlights the advantages viewed by the grassroots in all three of the of the broadcast over the written media, main parties; and attitudes towards the Cowling tracks public opinion from the run-up coalition in the media and the public. to the elections to the coalition's first anniversary, while Anstead considers media attitudes towards the coalition as a departure from the norm of single-party government. <>contents 04 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions We are very grateful to the authors for their psi/events/the-coalition-at-one). A special contributions. We should also like to thank debt of gratitude is owed to the Director of Alex Allan (Cabinet Office), Vernon Bogdanor the Institute for Government for his generous (Oxford University), Jon Davis (Mile End hospitality, and to Kerry Burkett, the IfG’s Institute, Queen Mary, University of London), tireless events manager. We also gratefully Stephen Greasley (University of East Anglia), acknowledge the contributions made by Peter Hennessy (Queen Mary, University of Emily Robinson, Chris Hanretty and Stephen London), Charlie Jeffery (Edinburgh University), Greasley to planning the programme. From Jeffrey A. Karp (Exeter University), Charles Lees UEA, Vanessa Buth helped administer the (Bath University), Iain McLean (Oxford event with her usual skill, efficiency and University), Akash Paun (Institute for friendliness, Henry Allen provided vital Government), Emily Robinson (Nottingham assistance before, during and after, and University), Nick Robinson (BBC), Peter Riddell Nick Wright helped prepare the papers (Institute for Government), and John Street for publication. We offer our sincere thanks (University of East Anglia), who participated in to all three. the conference as presenters, commentators Hussein Kassim, University of East Anglia or chairs. (A number have kindly made their Charles Clarke, University of East Anglia presentations available at www.uea.ac.uk/ Catherine Haddon, Institute for Government Contributors Lord Adonis Labour Party politician, Director Dr David Hall-Matthews , Senior Lecturer, School of the Institute for Government, 2010-11, and of Politics and International Studies, University of Secretary of State for Transport 2009-2010 Leeds and Chair of the Social Liberal Forum Dr Nick Anstead Lecturer in Media and Dr Chris Hanretty Lecturer in Politics, School of Communications, Department of Media and Political, Social and International Studies, UEA Communications, London School of Economics Professor Robert Hazell Professor of British Mr Adam Boulton Political Editor, Sky News Politics and Government, Director of the and author of ‘Hung Together: The 2010 Constitution Unit, UCL Election and the Coalition Government’ Lord McConnell Labour politician and First Professor Philip Cowley Professor of Minister of Scotland, 2001-2007 Parliamentary Government, Department Dr Thomas G. Otte Senior Lecturer, School of Politics and International Relations, of History, UEA University of Nottingham Mr Nick Pearce Director of the Institute for Mr David Cowling Editor, BBC Political Research Public Policy Research, Head of the Downing Mr Iain Dale Presenter on LBC Radio, Street Policy Unit, 2007-10 publisher of Total Politics Magazine and Dr Mark Stuart Research Fellow, Department blogger, Iain Dale’s Diary of Politics and International Relations, Lord Donoughue Senior Policy Advisor to Prime University of Nottingham Ministers Harold Wilson and James Callaghan Sir Robert Worcester Founder of MORI, and author of ‘Downing Street Diary’ Chancellor of the University of Kent , and Mr Chris Game Visiting Lecturer, Institute of Local co-author of ‘Explaining Cameron’s Coalition’ Government Studies, University of Birmingham Dr Ben Yong Research Associate, Constitution Unit, UCL <>contents Introduction 05 Contents Explaining Cameron’s Coalition: How it came about – an analysis of the 2010 British Election Bob Worcester . 06 Reflections on the formation of the Coalition Government Andrew Adonis . 13 Coalition Government in British Politics: Some historical reflections Thomas G. Otte . 16 The Lib-Lab Pact: March 1977-July 1978 Bernard Donoughue . 22 Coalition Government in Scotland Jack McConnell . 26 Coalitions in UK local government: What Westminster does today, local government did yesterday Chris Game . 28 The Coalition Government: How likely was it? How long will it last? Chris Hanretty . 35 Inside Story: How the Coalition really works Robert Hazell and Ben Yong . 39 The Coalition’s ‘wobbly wings’: Backbench dissent in the Commons since May 2010 Philip Cowley and Mark Stuart . 44 The Conservative Party and the Coalition Iain Dale . 49 Planning, positioning and policy process: Why coalition has tested relationships between the Liberal Democrat leadership and grassroots David Hall-Matthews . 53 The Labour Party and the Coalition Nick Pearce . 57 Hung together? Adam Boulton . 61 Coalition Government: First anniversary David Cowling . 65 The Coalition Government and the media Nick Anstead . 68 <>contents 06 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Explaining Cameron’s Coalition: How it came about – an analysis of the 2010 British Election Bob Worcester ([email protected]) There is the long campaign, and there is the in the House of Commons which
Recommended publications
  • HOUSE of COMMONS Exiting the European Union Committee

    HOUSE of COMMONS Exiting the European Union Committee

    HOUSE OF COMMONS Exiting the European Union Committee Oral evidence: The progress of the UK’s negotiations on EU withdrawal, HC 372 Monday 3 September 2018, Brussels Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 4 September 2018. Members present: Hilary Benn (Chair); Sir Christopher Chope; Stephen Crabb; Richard Graham; Peter Grant; Andrea Jenkyns; Stephen Kinnock; Jeremy Lefroy; Mr Pat McFadden; Seema Malhotra; Mr Jacob Rees-Mogg; Emma Reynolds; Stephen Timms; Mr John Whittingdale. Questions 2537 - 2563 Witnesses I: Michel Barnier, Chief Negotiator, European Commission, and Sabine Weyand, Deputy Chief Negotiator, European Commission. Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Michel Barnier and Sabine Weyand. Michel Barnier: Welcome once again. You are always welcome. Q2537 Chair: Michel, can I reciprocate on behalf of the Committee? It is very good to see you again. Can I begin by apologising that we had to let you down on the previous date when we were due to meet? We had certain important votes in Parliament that necessitated our attendance. Secondly, can I thank you very much for honouring the commitment you made to us the first time we met, that you would give evidence to the Committee on the record? Because as you are aware, today’s session is being recorded and will be published as an evidence session, so it is a slightly different format from our previous discussions. I understand entirely that you will want to check the English translation of what you said before the minutes are published and we realise that will take— Michel Barnier: Just to check that nothing is lost in translation.
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte

    'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte

    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
  • Three Corners' Bluff: Pre-War Europe's Most Dangerous Game

    Three Corners' Bluff: Pre-War Europe's Most Dangerous Game

    Pre-war Europe’s Most Dangerous Game Emily Falconer Major: History The U.K. Advisor: Professor William Fowler Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain The year 1938 was a turning point for international relations in pre-war Europe. While the United Kingdom and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics were previously able to keep their aggressive German enemy Sir Neville Henderson at bay, 1938 marked a dramatic shift in foreign policy for all three nations. For Germany, under the command of Adolf Hitler, it marked the start of his hostile expansion into British or Soviet territory. For British Ambassador to Germany “allies” the UK and the USSR, respectively led by Sir Neville Chamberlain and Josef Stalin, it forced each of them to make cut-throat decisions in regards to their long-time alliance, and to come to agreeable terms with their common enemy, Adolf Hitler. In 1938, the world was unclear; anything could happen, and “[Henderson] Had almost become Hitler’s all was fair game. Only one outcome was imminent: Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich were ready for war. The only question was: Who would he fight first? ambassador to us, rather than our ambassador to Hitler.” On one hand, the UK and the USSR were steadfast allies, committed to defeating fascism in Europe at all costs, and in thorough agreement to defend one another should one find themselves attacked by Germany. On the other hand, both the UK and the USSR feared each other just as much, if not more, “The personal representative of the prime than they feared Hitler’s Germany.
  • Haessly, Katie (2010) British Conservative Women Mps

    Haessly, Katie (2010) British Conservative Women Mps

    British Conservative Women MPs and ‘Women’s Issues’ 1950-1979 Katie Haessly, BA MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2010 1 Abstract In the period 1950-1979, there were significant changes in legislation relating to women’s issues, specifically employment, marital and guardianship and abortion rights. This thesis explores the impact of Conservative female MPs on these changes as well as the changing roles of women within the party. In addition there is a discussion of the relationships between Conservative women and their colleagues which provides insights into the changes in gender roles which were occurring at this time. Following the introduction the next four chapters focus on the women themselves and the changes in the above mentioned women’s issues during the mid-twentieth century and the impact Conservative women MPs had on them. The changing Conservative attitudes are considered in the context of the wider changes in women’s roles in society in the period. Chapter six explores the relationship between women and men of the Conservative Parliamentary Party, as well as men’s impact on the selected women’s issues. These relationships were crucial to enhancing women’s roles within the party, as it is widely recognised that women would not have been able to attain high positions or affect the issues as they did without help from male colleagues. Finally, the female Labour MPs in the alteration of women’s issues is discussed in Chapter seven. Labour women’s relationships both with their party and with Conservative women are also examined.
  • David Cameron's Speech Was About As Pro-European As Can Be Expected of a British Conservative Prime Minister in the Current Co

    David Cameron's Speech Was About As Pro-European As Can Be Expected of a British Conservative Prime Minister in the Current Co

    blo gs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/30204 David Cameron’s speech was about as pro-European as can be expected of a British Conservative Prime Minister in the current context On Wednesday, David Cameron delivered his long awaited speech on the UK’s relationship with Europe, guaranteeing a referendum on the country’s EU membership should his party win the next election. Simon Hix gives a critical reading of the speech, noting that the content was far more pro-European than might have been expected. He argues that there are strong reasons to support a renegotiation of the UK’s position inside the EU and that a referendum on this new agreement could re-engage British citizens with the European project. This article was first published on LSE’s EUROPP blog I read the complete text of David Cameron’s speech bef ore reading any of the commentary in newspapers, on the various blogs or f rom the usual twitterati. And I’m so glad I did. I came away f rom an unadulterated reading of the speech pleasantly surprised. This surprise in part ref lects my prior f ears that Cameron would deliver the most anti-European speech of any British Prime Minister. Instead, the speech is remarkably pro-European given current domestic circumstances – especially the shrillness of the anti-European tabloids, the Europhobia of some Tory backbenchers, and the rising UKIP tide. The Prime Minister made the case f or Europe, f or the EU single market, f or Britain as a European power, and even f or deeper integration in the Eurozone.
  • The Conservative Party's Credibility Deficit Updated Tax and Spending

    The Conservative Party's Credibility Deficit Updated Tax and Spending

    The Conservative Party’s credibility deficit Updated tax and spending commitments April 2010 2 Contents Page Introduction 5 Summary 7 Methodology 8 Tables 10 Broken promises 13 45,000 new single rooms in the NHS 15 5,000 new prison places 19 Reducing taxes on savings 22 More places for science courses, training and apprenticeships 24 Maternity nurses for all 25 Reinstate the Defence Export Services Organisation (DESO) 28 National Loan Guarantee Scheme 30 Tax cuts 33 Corporation tax and investment allowance changes 35 Freeze council tax for two years 38 Reduce employers’ NICs for some small companies 41 Tax cuts for married couples 43 Inheritance tax cuts 50 Reverse impact of abolition of dividend tax credit 53 Tax reversals 57 Raise National Insurance Contributions thresholds 59 Oppose Broadband levy 61 Oppose cider duty increase 63 Tax increases 65 Non-domicile levy 67 Spending reductions 73 Cut Government “waste” 75 Savings on employment and skills programmes 78 Reduce spending on Building Schools for the Future 83 Reduce eligibility for tax credits 85 Reduce eligibility for Child Trust Funds 88 Reduce government spending on consultants and advertising 90 Reduce “bureaucracy” spending by a third 92 Welfare savings 95 Scrap ContactPoint 98 NHS IT Programme 100 Freeze pay and cap pensions for public sector workers 103 Reduce spending on Sure Start outreach workers 105 3 Scrap some Regional Development Agencies 107 Scrap regional assemblies 109 Scrap identity cards 110 “Cutting the cost of politics” 112 Scrap the Trade Union Modernisation
  • From 'Greenest Government Ever' to 'Get Rid of All the Green Crap': David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment

    From 'Greenest Government Ever' to 'Get Rid of All the Green Crap': David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment

    This is a repository copy of From ‘greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the environment. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/85469/ Version: Submitted Version Article: Carter, Neil Thomas orcid.org/0000-0003-3378-8773 and Clements, Ben (2015) From ‘greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the environment. British Politics. 204–225. ISSN 1746-918X https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.16 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ From ‘Greenest government ever’ to ‘get rid of all the green crap’: David Cameron, the Conservatives and the Environment by Neil Carter (University of York) and Ben Clements (University of Leicester) Published in British Politics, early online April 2015. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy-edit version of the paper.
  • 2011-2012, Vol. 27

    2011-2012, Vol. 27

    2011-2012 NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVES IN HISTORY VOLUME XXVII, 2011-2012 PERSPECTIVES IN HISTORY VOLUME Perspectives in History VOL. XXVII, 2011-2012 PHI ALPHA THETA ALPHA BETA PHI CHAPTER XXVIIPHI ALPHA THETA JOURNAL OF ALPHA BETA PHI CHAPTER OF PHI ALPHA THETA Officers Perspectives in Alpha Beta Phi Chapter History 2011-2012 James Lupo .................................President Ex-officio EDITOR Alexandra Barrett ......................President Kevin J. Leibach Caitlin Stylinski Hazelip ...........Vice President ASSISTANT EDITORS Matthew Chalfant ......................Treasurer Aaron Sprinkles Vincent Fraley ............................Historian Sheryn Labate Shane Winslow ..........................Secretary FACULTY ADVISOR Kevin Leibach .............................Journal Editor William Landon Kari Becker .................................Wellness Officer Perspectives in History is an annual scholarly publication of the Depart- ment of History and Geography at Northern Kentucky Unviersity (NKU). Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of the NKU Board of Regents, the faculty of the university, or of the student editors of the journal. Manuscripts are welcome from students and faculty in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Send all articles, essays, and reviews to: Northern Kentucky University History/Geography Department Highland Heights, KY 41099 This publication was prepared by Northern Kentucky University and printed with state funds (KRS 57.375). Northern Kentucky University is committed to building a diverse faculty and staff for employment and promotion to ensure the highest quality of workforce and to foster an environment that embraces the broad range of human diversity. The university is committed to equal employment opportunity, affirmative action, and eliminating discrimination. This commitment is consistent with an intellectual community that celebrates individual differences and diversity as well as being a matter of law.
  • The Big Society: a New Policy Environment for the Third Sector? Pete Alcock

    The Big Society: a New Policy Environment for the Third Sector? Pete Alcock

    Third Sector Research Centre Working Paper 82 The Big Society: a new policy environment for the third sector? Pete Alcock June 2012 Working Paper 82 Paper Working June 2012 June Abstract This Working Paper updates the analysis of the Coalition government’s Big Society policy agenda first published in 2010. It explores the policy context for the Big Society initiative and the key features of the policy programme developed by the Coalition since 2010. It then outlines some of the contradictions and challenges within this policy programme, and for the relations between the third sector and the state more generally. It is also pointed out that the Big Society is an English political discourse with different policy developments now taking place within the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Keywords Big Society, third sector, policy, civil society, devolution. Acknowledgements An earlier version of this paper was published in Voluntary Sector Review, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 379-90. This version will also be published as a chapter in The Welfare State Reader, 3rd edition, F. Castles, I. Nauman and C. Pierson (eds.) Polity Press, 2012. Thank you to Peter Backus for preparing Figure 1. 1 Contents A new UK policy discourse .................................................................................................................. 3 The policy legacy and the 2010 election ............................................................................................. 3 Building Coalition policy .....................................................................................................................
  • Going, Going, Gone: How Safe Is David Cameron?

    Going, Going, Gone: How Safe Is David Cameron?

    Going, Going, Gone: How Safe is David Cameron? democraticaudit.com /2016/06/03/going-going-gone-how-safe-is-david-cameron/ By Democratic Audit UK 2016-6-3 Last weekend, rumors were once again abound of plots to remove David Cameron as leader. Ben Worthy assesses the Prime Minister’s position in light of the latest threat, and writes that although it appears probable he will survive attempts to topple him in the short-term, the plots, rumours and rebellion will continue. David Cameron at first Cabinet meeting in 2010. Credit: Crown Copyright The UK’s EU referendum has turned into a series of threats against Cameron himself. The weekend was dominated by swirling rumours about Conservative MPs plotting to remove their leader with talk of plots of 50 MPs, (metaphorical) ‘stabbing in the front’ and letters to the 1922 committee. This isn’t the first time Cameron has faced challenges to his position. So how safe is he now? The rules for triggering an election for a Conservative party leader are clear. To ‘secure a confidence vote, 15% of Conservative Members of Parliament (“in receipt of the Conservative Whip”) must submit a request for such a vote, in writing, to the Chairman of the 1922 Committee’. This means 50 MPs need to sign a letter. There are 330 Conservative whipped MPs in the House of Commons. It is estimated that around 110 are definitely Brexit versus 128 MPs for Remain with the rest unknown. There are likely enough unhappy MPs to get 50 signatures on a letter. How these numbers may translate into a leadership election is less clear.
  • STRONGER ECONOMY, FAIRER SOCIETY Welcome to the Directory for the Liberal Democrat Autumn 2014 Federal Conference

    STRONGER ECONOMY, FAIRER SOCIETY Welcome to the Directory for the Liberal Democrat Autumn 2014 Federal Conference

    LIBERAL DEMOCRATS AUTUMN CONFERENCE DIRECTORY GLASGOW 4TH-8TH OCTOBER 2014 Clear print version This clear print version of the Conference Directory matches as closely as possible the text of the published Directory. Page number cross references are correct within this clear print document. Some information may appear in a different place from its location in the published Directory. Complex layouts and graphics have been omitted. Some pages, such as the map of Glasgow and venue and exhibition plans, are available as separate documents at www.libdems.org.uk/conference_papers A plain text version of the Directory is available at www.libdems.org.uk/conference_papers The Directory and other conference publications, in PDF, plain text and clear print formats, are available online at www.libdems.org.uk/conference_papers Edited by Emma Price and published by The Conference Office, Liberal Democrats, 8–10 Great George Street, London SW1P 3AE. Designed and produced by Mike Cooper, [email protected]. STRONGER ECONOMY, FAIRER SOCIETY Welcome to the Directory for the Liberal Democrat Autumn 2014 Federal Conference. Conference venue Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre (SECC) Exhibition Way, Glasgow, G3 8YW www.secc.co.uk Conference hotel Crowne Plaza Glasgow Congress Road, Glasgow, G3 8QT www.crowneplazaglasgow.co.uk Official fringe venue Hotel Campanile Glasgow 10 Tunnel Street, Glasgow, G3 8HL www.campanile-glasgow-secc.co.uk If you have any questions whilst at conference please ask a conference steward or go to the Information Desk in the foyer of the Clyde Auditorium. For the details of conference sessions, motions etc. and auditorium information, see the separate Agenda.
  • The President's News Conference with Prime Minister Tony Blair Of

    The President's News Conference with Prime Minister Tony Blair Of

    Nov. 19 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 your home. Through the last century and and British servicemembers are sacrificing into our own, Americans have appreciated in a necessary and noble cause. Once again, the friendship of your people. And we are we are acting to secure the peace of the grateful for your personal commitment world. across five decades to the health and vitality The bonds between our countries were of the alliance between our nations. formed in hard experience. We passed Of course, things didn’t start out too through great adversity together. We have well. [Laughter] Yet, even at America’s risen through great challenges together. founding, our nations shared a basic belief The mutual respect and fellowship between in human liberty. That conviction more our countries is deep and strong and per- than anything else led to our reconciliation. manent. And in time, our shared commitment to Let us raise our glasses to our common freedom became the basis of a great Atlan- ideals, to our enduring friendships, to the tic alliance that defeated tyranny in Europe preservation of our liberties, and to Her and saved the liberty of the world. Majesty, the Queen of the United Kingdom The story of liberty, the story of the of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Magna Carta and the Declaration of Inde- pendence, continues in our time. The NOTE: The President spoke at 8:49 p.m. in power of freedom has touched Asia and the Ballroom at Buckingham Palace. In his Latin America and Africa and beyond. And remarks, he referred to Prince Philip, Duke now our two countries are carrying out a of Edinburgh.