DOCSLIB.ORG

17/Winter 97/98

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
17/Winter 97/98 Journal of Liberal Democrat History issue 17 Winter 1997–98 £3.00 Liberals Unite The Origins of Liberal International Scottish Devolution Reports The Grimond Years Religion and the Liberal Party From Beveridge to Blair: Reform of the Young Liberals Welfare State The ‘Red Guard’ Era Reviews Harry Willcock The Liberal Democrats The Forgotten Champion of Liberalism The Strange Death of Liberal England Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 17: Winter 1997–98 The Journal of Liberal Democrat 3 Liberals Unite The Origins Of Liberal International History 1997 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the foundation of The Journal of Liberal Democrat Liberal International. Dr Julie Smith traces the events of History is published quarterly by 1947. the Liberal Democrat History Group. 6 Scottish Devolution: The Grimond Years The History Group promotes the After almost 300 years, Scotland is to have a Parliament discussion and research of historical again. Dr Geoffrey Sell examines the role of Jo Grimond topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Demo- in the story of Scottish devolution. crats, Liberal Party and the SDP. Contributions to the Journal – 10 Report: Religion and the Liberal Party letters, articles, and book reviews – Evening meeting, July 1997, with Alan Beith MP and are invited. Please type them and if Jonathan Parry. Report by Nick South. possible enclose a computer file on disc. Contributions should be sent to the Editor at the address below. 12 Report: From Beveridge to Blair Fringe meeting, September 1997, with Frank Field MP and For more information on the Liberal Democrat History Group, Nick Timmins. Report by David Cloke. including details of back issues of the Newsletter, tape records of 14 Young Liberals: the ‘Red Guard’ Era meetings. ‘Mediawatch’, Peter Hellyer argues that foreign policy issues had a ‘Thesiswatch’ and Research in Progress services, see our web site: crucial role to play in the growth of the Young Liberals in http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/ the 1960s and ’70s. ~dbrack/ldhg/index.html 16 Harry Willcock Editorial/Correspondence Duncan Brack (Editor) The Forgotten Champion of Liberalism Flat 9, 6 Hopton Road, Mark Egan remembers the Liberal who helped ensure that London SW16 2EQ. British citizens today are not compelled to carry identity email: [email protected]. cards. Subscriptions/Membership A subscription to the Journal of 18 Review: Who Did It? Liberal Democrat History costs George Dangerfield: The Strange Death of Liberal £7.50 (£4.00 unwaged rate); this England. Reviewed by Graham Lippiatt. includes membership of the History Group unless you inform us other- wise. Send a cheques (payable to 19 Review: Building the Party ‘Liberal Democrat History Group’) Don MacIver (ed), The Liberal Democrats. to Patrick Mitchell, 6 Palfrey Place, Reviewed by Tony Little. London SW8 1PA. Published by Liberal Democrat History Group, c/o Flat 9, 6 Hopton Road, London Front page photo: SW16 2EQ. The founders of Liberal International at Wadham College, Printed by Kall-Kwik, 426 Chiswick Oxford, April 1947. High Road, London W4 5TF. Reproduced with the kind permission of Liberal International. January 1998. 2 journal of liberal democrat history 17: Winter 1997–98 Liberals Unite The Origins Of Liberal International 1997 marked the fiftieth anniversary of the foundation of Liberal International. Dr Julie Smith traces the events of 1947. History is made by those who follow a political ideal. position in the headquarters of the Allied Land Forces in Oslo. MacCallum Scott was keen to Sceptics merely look on. set up some sort of international liberal organi- Roger Motz, Opening Address at the Mondorf-les- sation and so, equipped with the names of some Bains Congress, 19 August 1953. Norwegian liberals, he soon made contact with, inter alia, former members of the Norwegian In November liberals from around the world resistance Halfdan Christophersen and Johan Andresen. MacCallum Scott explained his de- descended on Oxford to celebrate the fiftieth sire to initiate international cooperation and anniversary of the Liberal International (World quickly won support from his Norwegian con- Liberal Union). Some of the participants were tacts, who offered to host a meeting with Brit- ish liberals to discuss the matter further. returning personally to the place where they had MacCallum Scott wrote to the British Lib- helped to found LI in April . eral Party to announce the Norwegian offer, but the party was preoccupied by domestic politics Liberal International was established in the in the aftermath of the disastrous results of the wake of the Second World War, but interna- election. He also, however, wrote to in- tional liberal contact can be traced back much dividual liberals and the response was far more further. In particular, European liberals met positive. In particular, Sir Percy Harris, who had from , and in the Entente des Partis been Liberal Chief Whip until he lost his seat Libéraux et Démocratiques similaires was formally in , offered a great deal of support. Sir Percy established. The Entente met regularly suggested resurrecting the Entente, but throughout the next decade, bringing together MacCallum Scott wanted the new organisation liberals from across Europe, including British to have a much stronger administrative capacity Prime Minister David Lloyd George and than the Entente had had. Thus, the first stage in French premier Edouard Herriot, but ceased the project was the creation of the British Lib- to meet in , when the international situ- eral International Council (BLIC) – subse- ation made cooperation too complex. Inter- quently renamed Liberal International (British national cooperation among young liberals Group) – with Sir Percy as its President. took place within the Union of Radical and The Belgian Liberal Party celebrated its cen- Democratic Youth, which was established in tenary in . Its leader, Senator Roger Motz, . The Union in particular fostered liberal also supported the idea of international liberal contacts which were later to be of use in set- cooperation. He therefore invited many liberals ting up Liberal International. from across Europe to the centenary celebra- In the aftermath of the Second World War, tions held in June , when he took the op- renewed ideas for liberal cooperation emerged portunity to discuss closer cooperation. Repre- from two sources, one Anglo-Norwegian and sentatives of the Belgian, British, Danish, Dutch, one Belgian. They were in part a response to French, Italian, Swedish and Swiss liberal par- increasing globalisation and a sense that the ties attended the lavish gathering in Brussels. nation state was becoming outdated; in part a Among those present were Spanish exile Salva- reaction to international insecurity and the au- dor de Madariaga, Danish liberal Hermod thoritarianism of the left and of the right which Lannung and the Anglo-Italian Max Salvadori, had led to two world wars. all of whom were later to play a large part in In John MacCallum Scott took up a Liberal International. journal of liberal democrat history 17: Winter 1997–98 3 One difficulty which had eral Party, the actual organisation of ent of parties and open to people emerged in Oslo – that there were the Conference fell to MacCallum who were not members of political usually as many different opinions as Scott and the British Liberal Inter- parties. The Italian Professor Giovanni there were liberals present – also national Council. Wadham College, Cassandro rejected this view, saying proved true in Brussels. Neverthe- Oxford, the alma mater of both that liberal principles in the form of less, there was enough consensus for MacCallum Scott and Halfdan a manifesto should be ‘entrusted to agreement to be reached on the Christopherson, was chosen as the political groups organised in the Declaration of Brussels, which set venue, since it was hoped that the form of a party’. Dr Pavel Tigrid, a out basic liberal principles. There was Oxford setting might mask the aus- Czechoslovak delegate, pointed out further progress towards cooperation terity measures still prevailing in Brit- that this would impede growth since when, at the end of the celebrations, ain. Representatives from nineteen while individuals living in totalitar- British Liberal leader Clement Davies countries – Austria, Belgium, Canada, ian regimes might be able to form announced: ‘And next year we shall Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Estonia, groups, there was little hope of lib- eral parties emerging and affiliating. A sub-committee was set up to The manifesto appears uncontentious in consider the question and a compro- the 1990s. However, in the 1940s its mise solution was adopted to the ef- fect that each country should deter- opposition to totalitarianism was extremely mine the constitution of its own significant. group, thus allowing group and party affiliation. This question prefigured a long-running tension within LI all meet again to resume our labours. Finland, France, Germany, Great over the relative merits of individual On behalf of my colleagues here and Britain, Hungary, Italy, Norway, versus party membership. Since my party at home, I invite you all, Spain, South Africa, Sweden, Swit- many of those present in Oxford, in- and many, many more, to join us in zerland, Turkey and the United States cluding MacCallum Scott, had only Britain at a conference of Liberals – attended the Conference. Del- loose ties with their national parties, of the World.’ This was one of the egates included such eminent figures there was strong support for the con- few occasions when the British Lib- as Theodor Heuss, Roger Motz, cept of an organisation based on eral Party, as opposed to active and René Pleven and Viscount Samuel. group affiliation. However, over the enthusiastic individual British liber- Among the main topics consid- years this position shifted. The last- als, helped set the agenda for LI. The ered in Oxford was the organisation ever individual member, the then offer was immediately accepted and of the proposed international body Bulgarian President Zheliou Zhelev, led to the Oxford Congress of – and the drafting of a manifesto.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas a Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill As a Liberal J
    Journal of Issue 25 / Winter 1999–2000 / £5.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY Crossing the Floor Roy Douglas A Failure of Leadership Liberal Defections 1918–29 Senator Jerry Grafstein Winston Churchill as a Liberal J. Graham Jones A Breach in the Family Megan and Gwilym Lloyd George Nick Cott The Case of the Liberal Nationals A re-evaluation Robert Maclennan MP Breaking the Mould? The SDP Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 25: Winter 1999–2000 Journal of Liberal Democrat History Political Defections Special issue: Political Defections The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group 3 Crossing the floor ISSN 1463-6557 Graham Lippiatt Liberal Democrat History Group Editorial The Liberal Democrat History Group promotes the discussion and research of 5 Out from under the umbrella historical topics, particularly those relating to the histories of the Liberal Democrats, Liberal Tony Little Party and the SDP. The Group organises The defection of the Liberal Unionists discussion meetings and publishes the Journal and other occasional publications. 15 Winston Churchill as a Liberal For more information, including details of publications, back issues of the Journal, tape Senator Jerry S. Grafstein records of meetings and archive and other Churchill’s career in the Liberal Party research sources, see our web site: www.dbrack.dircon.co.uk/ldhg. 18 A failure of leadership Hon President: Earl Russell. Chair: Graham Lippiatt. Roy Douglas Liberal defections 1918–29 Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, 24 Tory cuckoos in the Liberal nest? articles, and book reviews – are invited. The Journal is a refereed publication; all articles Nick Cott submitted will be reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • 18/Spring 98
    Merger Hopes and Fears Were They Realised? Alliance into merger: how has it worked? Rt. Hon. Alan Beith, MP examines the myths and the realities. It seems an age since a number of us were the Tories at the one after. The Social Democrats who backed merger, condemned to endless meetings in often miserable and had to put up with undisguised bitterness – but never smoke-filled – rooms for the merger and calumny from others in their party as a negotiations between the Liberals and the SDP. Was result, saw merger as essential to the continu- ance of their mission to provide an electable it really only ten years ago? Were we once in separate and responsible alternative to the Tories. They parties? Did the process of merger really have to be realised that what they had achieved in detach- so painful and damaging, given that the party which ing so many from the Labour Party and at- tracting significant new support would not last emerged became, after the first couple of years, a if they remained in competition with the Lib- very congenial party to be in and one which is now erals. They hoped to advance many policies enjoying well-deserved success? which they found they shared with Liberals. Then there were the fears which made the It is instructive to look back to the hopes negotiations so difficult. Liberals feared that and fears which surrounded the Alliance and Liberal identity in the minds of voters would the merger. Liberals hoped to prevent the dis- be lost, and that Liberalism itself could be dan- sipation and division of their potential support gerously diluted in the philosophy and poli- which resulted from competition between the cies of the new party.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Thinkers
    REPOrt – liBERAL thiNKERS Was such ‘pre-membering’ public Liberal Thinkers adoration, politics or ego? While Bounous conceded that there may Conference fringe meeting, 5 October 2014, with Alan have been an element of personal Beith, John Pugh, Liz Barker and Mark Pack; chair: Malcolm vanity, for example in the cor- ner stone of the Council House, Bruce the timing of the monuments was Report by Douglas Oliver much more suggestive of politically motivated public demonstration. The clock tower in the Jewellery he Liberal Democrat His- twentieth century: Foreign Sec- Quarter was timed in relation to tory Group met on the retary Edward Grey and the man his resignation from government TSunday night of the Octo- often credited with designing the and renewed his links to small busi- ber Federal Conference to dis- modern welfare state, Sir William nessmen. ‘Old Joe’, the tower at the cuss ‘Liberal Thinkers’ in an event Beveridge. Beith recalled that when university of which Chamberlain scheduled to tie in with the pam- he arrived in the area in the early was a principal sponsor, served to phlet of the same name released for 1970s, Beveridge’s ‘first-principles’ distract from the Boer War but also the first time in Glasgow. approach and reflective poise was reminded the community of his Musing upon his long involve- still widely remembered by locals commitment to promoting educa- ment with the party, the discus- in their mutual corner of north-east tion. There are more – and more In his book sion’s chair Malcolm Bruce – the England. Beveridge was known in prominent – monuments to Cham- outgoing MP for Gordon, appear- the area for his sometimes philo- berlain than to John Bright or Tory of essays, ing at his last autumn conference sophical village hall discursives; hero Colonel Burnaby, each popu- as a Westminster representative and whilst he did occasionally lar in his time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Devolution Tony Little Examines the Lessons from the First Home Rule Bill of 1886
    The Evolution of Devolution Tony Little examines the lessons from the first Home Rule Bill of 1886 Devolving power has been Liberal Democrat philosophy politics, not even the devastating Irish famine, until Parnell for so long that it has become an instinctive reaction to became leader of the nationalist movement. solving community problems. Gladstone’s contribution to The nineteenth century Irish electoral system mirrored the development of this philosophy and his efforts to apply that of Britain, usually with a delay in reforms crossing the it to Ireland through a Home Rule Bill still have lessons for Irish Sea. Corruption and violence were more pronounced today, not only for the Irish peace process but also for a but then they were not uncommon in England. Despite Scottish parliament. intimidation, on balance voters followed self interest within the existing system rather than revolutionary ideals. Through The Home Rule Plan an attractive agrarian programme, Parnell combined this economic interest with a denominational identity and When looking at the Home Rule Bill, we should constitutional pressure towards nationalism. At home, remember that neither Ireland nor England enjoyed local Parnell mobilised popular forces in the Land League, government as we know it today. County councils were inventing the boycott as an effective peaceful campaign tactic not established until . Gladstone sketched the essence while maintaining ambiguous links with militant Fenian of his bill on a single sheet of paper at Lord Rosebery’s groups. In Westminster, he perfected parliamentary home in November . For the details he drew upon the obstruction to keep Irish grievances in the headlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Nations and Regions: the Dynamics of Devolution
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Devolution and the Centre Quarterly Report February 2003 by Guy Lodge The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust 1 Contents Contents Key Points 1 Devolution and Westminster 1.1 House of Lords Debate on the Constitution 1.2 New Breakaway Conservative Party 1.3 House of Lords Constitution Committee 1.4 Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill 1.5 Parliamentary Questions to the Wales Office 1.6 The Work of the Territorial Select Committees 1.7 The Work of the Grand Committees 1.8 Select Committee on the Lord Chancellor’s Department 1.9 Minority Party Representation on Select Committees 1.10 Barnett Formula 1.11 House of Lords Reform 2 Devolution and Whitehall 2.1 Edwina Hart accuses Whitehall of obstructing National Assembly 2.2 Helen Liddell Announces Decision on MSP Numbers 2.3 The Future of the Territorial Offices 3 Intergovernmental Relations 3.1 Meeting of JMC (Europe) 3.2 British-Irish Council Summit 3.3 Meeting of the British-Irish Council Environment Group 3.4 Meeting of the British-Irish Council Drugs Group 3.5 UK Government and the Devolved Bodies Launch the Animal Health and Welfare Strategy Consultation 2 Key Points • Assembly Finance Minister Edwina Hart criticises Whitehall civil servants • Lord Norton debate on the British Constitution in the House of Lords • Helen Liddell announces that the number of MSPs will remain at 129 in the outcome of the consultation on the size of the Scottish Parliament. • House of Lords Constitution Committee publishes Devolution: Inter- Institutional Relations in the United Kingdom • House of Lords debate on the Barnett Formula • Second Reading and Committee Stage of the Regional Assemblies (Preparations) Bill • Seven options for Lords Reform fail to gain a majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Politics
    the Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson The Language of Progressive Politics in Modern Britain Emily Robinson Department of Politics University of Sussex Brighton, United Kingdom ISBN 978-1-137-50661-0 ISBN 978-1-137-50664-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-50664-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016963256 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 The author(s) has/have asserted their right(s) to be identified as the author(s) of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub- lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • RADICAL REFORM GROUP the Radical Reform Group Has Until Recently Been Relatively Neglected by Historians of the Liberal Party
    RADICAL REfORm GROuP The Radical Reform Group has until recently been relatively neglected by historians of the Liberal Party. Graham Lippiatt gives an overview of the group’s formation and history, examines the material published by the group itself and reviews the published literature which covers it. he Radical Reform its own, policies which will both the News Chronicle entitled ‘Left or Group (RRG) was a give effect to the principles [of Limbo?’. It called the earlier deci- social liberal pressure liberty and social justice] and gain sion to divorce from the party a group of the 1950s and wide acceptance from all shades mistake, criticising the RRG for 1960s. It was founded of political opinion.’10 The RRG’s having been dormant too long Tin 19521 by Desmond Banks2 and intention was to create an effective and looked forward to its renewed Peter Grafton.3 Concerned that, third force in British politics and activities on the left of centre, under the leadership of Clement looked for ways of forging links where it said ‘all good Liberals Davies, the Liberal Party was fall- with like-minded individuals in should be’.17 ing unduly under the sway of clas- other parties. Banks also gave as Thereafter the RRG contin- sical, free-market liberals and was a justification for the formation of ued its role as an internal social drifting to the right, they feared the RRG the need to strengthen liberal ginger group, supportive of the domination of the party by the Liberal Party as an alternative Jo Grimond’s electoral strategy of economic liberals such as Oliver for disillusioned electors against realignment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forgotten Lib–Con Alliance
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 79 / Summer 2013 / £6.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y A forgotten Lib–Con alliance Alun Wyburn-Powell The Constitutionalists and the 1924 election A new party or a worthless coupon? David Dutton ‘A nasty, deplorable little incident in our political life’ The Dumfries Standard, 1957 David Cloke David Lloyd George: the legacy Meeting report James Fargher The South African war and its effect on the Liberal alliance Kenneth O. Morgan The relevance of Henry Richard The ‘apostle of peace’ Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 79 Summer 2013 Journal of Liberal History Issue 79: Summer 2013 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Liberal history news 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Lloyd George commemorations; plaque to Lord john Russell; Gladstone statue Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl unveiled in Seaforth Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini A forgotten Liberal–Conservative alliance 6 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, The Constitutionalists and the 1924 election – a new party or a worthless York Membery coupon? by Alun Wyburn-Powell Patrons Letters to the Editor 15 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Honor Balfour (Michael Meadowcroft and Hugh Pagan) Professor John Vincent Editorial Board Liberal history quiz 2012 15 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Ian Cawood; Matt Cole; Dr Roy The answers (questions in issue 78) Douglas; Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr ‘A nasty, deplorable little incident in our political 16 Alison Holmes; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE PROVISION for SOCIAL NEED: SERIES TWO: Parts 3 and 4
    STATE PROVISION FOR SOCIAL NEED: SERIES TWO: Parts 3 and 4 STATE PROVISION FOR SOCIAL NEED: Series Two: The Beveridge Papers from the British Library of Political and Economic Science Part 3: Correspondence and Papers on Health Services, Old Age, Pensions, New Towns and Post-War Europe, 1919-1962 Part 4: Reports and Working Papers on Coal, Unemployment, Food Rationing, Manpower, Fuel, and Social Insurance, 1925-1962 Contents listing PUBLISHER'S NOTE - PART 3 TECHNICAL NOTE CONTENTS OF REELS - PART 3 PUBLISHER'S NOTE - PART 4 CONTENTS OF REELS - PART 4 STATE PROV SOC NEED: SERIES TWO: Parts 3 and 4 Publisher's Note - Part 3 In Series Two of this microfilm project we cover Sections III, IV, VI, VII and VIII of the William Henry Beveridge Papers from the British Library of Political and Economic Science. This project covers just those Sections of subject files with a strong bearing on the Welfare State, the Beveridge Report, Social Insurance, Health, Pensions and Economic Planning after 1945. Other Sections, principally the major runs of correspondence and other material still restricted by copyright are not covered here. The subject files in this microfilm project are made available as follows: Part 1: Early Working Papers on Welfare, Labour and Unemployment Insurance, 1902-1944 (Sections III and IV) Part 2: Politics, Economic Planning, Social Insurance, Health and the Welfare State, 1944-1963 (Section VI) Part 3: Correspondence and Papers on Health Services, Old Age, Pensions, New Towns and Post-War Europe, 1919- 1962 (Section VII) Part 4: Reports and Working Papers on Coal, Unemployment, Food Rationing, Manpower, Fuel and Social Insurance, 1925-1961 (Section VIII) Re-examining the Welfare State in detail has become a major preoccupation of modern day governments in the late 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Autumn Conference
    ONLINE AUTUMN CONFERENCE 2021 17-20 SEPTEMBER DIRECTORY NEU Network Help us shape the future of education: be part of the National Education Union Councillor network. Being a member of our network will give you: > Access to written briefings. > Regular information about education issues. > Access to our events for councillors. The NEU Councillors Network is open to councillors from all political parties. The Network is now over 4,000 members strong. Join our Network at neu.org.uk/councillors-network or by scanning the QR code e [email protected] @neucllrs @NEUCllrs NEU2258/0721 NEU2258 Lib Dem advert 2 FP.indd 1 26/07/2021 13:42 CONFERENCE DIRECTORY 1 Welcome to the Liberal Democrat Online Autumn 2021 Conference Directory. Please note that the Conference Directory is available online only and not in hard copy format. Updates to the Conference Directory will be issued periodically up until conference and published online at: www.libdems.org.uk/a21-directory For details of the main auditorium sessions, see the separate Conference Agenda, available at: www.libdems.org.uk/a21-agenda Further information, registration and conference publications (including plain text and clear print versions) are available at: www.libdems.org.uk/conference Contents Feature: 2–3 Welcome to our online Autumn Conference from Ed Davey MP and Mark Pack Conference information: 4–9 Exhibition: 11–15 Fringe and training: 16–65 Friday 17 September 19 Saturday 18 September 27 Sunday 19 September 46 Monday 20 September 59 Autumn 2021 Directory vsn 2 Published and promoted by Mike Dixon on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, 1 Vincent Square, London, SW1P 2PN.
    [Show full text]
  • 67 Summer 2010
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 67 / Summer 2010 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals and the left Matthew Roberts Out of Chartism, into Liberalism Popular radicals and the Liberal Party Michael Freeden The Liberal Party and the New Liberalism John Shepherd The flight from the Liberal PartyLiberals who joined Labour, 1914–31 Matt Cole ‘An out-of-date word’ Jo Grimond and the left Peter Hellyer The Young Liberals and the left, 1965–70 Liberal Democrat History Group Liberal Leaders The latest publication from the Liberal Democrat History Group is Liberal Leaders: Leaders of the Liberal Party, SDP and Liberal Democrats since 1900. The sixty-page booklet contains concise biographies of every Liberal, Social Democrat and Liberal Democrat leader since 1900. The total of sixteen biographies stretches from Henry Campbell-Bannerman to Nick Clegg, including such figures as H. H. Asquith, David Lloyd George, Jo Grimond, David Steel, David Owen and Paddy Ashdown. Liberal Leaders is available to Journal of Liberal History subscribers for the special price of £5 (normal price £6) with free p&p. To order, please send a cheque for £5.00 (made out to ‘Liberal Democrat History Group’) to LDHG, 38 Salford Road, London SW2 4BQ. RESEARCH IN PROGRESS If you can help any of the individuals listed below with sources, contacts, or any other information — or if you know anyone who can — please pass on details to them. Details of other research projects in progress should be sent to the Editor (see page 3) for inclusion here.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1924 Labour Government and the Failure of the Whips
    The 1924 Labour Government and the Failure of the Whips by Michael Meadowcroft The first Labour government has been the subject of much research aided by a remarkable number of MPs who served in the 1924 parliament who either wrote memoirs or were the subject of biographies. However, though there is a consensus on the underlying strategic aim of Labour to use the arithmetic of the Liberals’ political dilemma to deal the party a lethal blow, there has been no focus hitherto on the day-to-day parliamentary process and the lack of a clear Labour strategy in government. There was neither a tactical decision to have measures that the Liberals could be expected to support, nor a deliberate policy to press forward with more socialist legislation that would please its own MPs, or at least the more vocal of them, and deliberately challenge the Liberal MPs. Instead the government continued along an almost day-to-day existence. The Labour parliamentary party had no collective experience of managing parliament and singularly failed to learn the tricks of the trade, not least as a consequence of the failure of the party whips to function effectively. This analysis focuses on the key role of the party whips and on their responsibility for the short nine-month life of the first Labour government. I have to declare an interest as a paid up member of the Whips’ Union having acted as Alan Beith’s deputy whip, 1983–86. The importance of the whips in a party system is a neglected field of study.
    [Show full text]