1) Pagan Origin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1) Pagan Origin CELEBRATE CHRISTMAS? Some feel that it is unimportant (or even sinful) to celebrate Christ’s birthday at all. The arguments used by anti-Christmas proponents are normally: 1) The Bible is silent on the date of Jesus birth. The December 25th date of Christmas and the many associated customs all come from pagan sources. All Christmas celebrations are therefore pagan. 2) Christians never observed Christmas until the 4th century. Therefore it must have been the emperor Constantine or “some pope” who introduced the festival as a form of honour to the sun god. 3) There is no instruction or precedent in the Bible to celebrate Jesus’ birth. LEGAL EVIDENCE In most legal systems today: The quantum of evidence is the amount of evidence needed; the quality of proof is how reliable such evidence should be considered. This includes such concepts as hearsay, authentication, admissibility, reasonable doubt, and clear and convincing evidence. There are several types of evidence, depending on the form or source. Evidence governs the use of testimony (e.g., oral or written statements, such as an affidavit), exhibits (e.g., physical objects), documentary material, or demonstrative evidence, which are admissible (i.e., allowed to be considered by the trier of fact, such as jury) in a judicial or administrative proceeding (e.g., a court of law). 1 1 Wikipedia - Evidence (law) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_%28law%29 LEGAL EVIDENCE We have concepts like “burden of proof”. This principle also known as the presumption of innocence, is summed up with the phrase “innocent until proven guilty”. In order for a successful conviction a crime must be proven “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Motive should also be established and the defence may use “character witnesses” for the accused. Indirect evidence: Circumstantial evidence might point to the possibility of guilt but it is only when a significant amount of this type of evidence is presented that the likelihood of guilt is assumed. Hearsay is never admissible. DIRECT EVIDENCE If eye witnesses are available then it must be established if they are reliable. The Bible gives cases when false witness brought about a wrongful conviction of the likes of the righteous Naboth (1 Kings 21:10), Stephen (Acts 6:13) and even Jesus (Matt 26:60-61). The Bible itself indicates that there should be at least 2 or more witnesses in order for a conviction. Deut 17:6 On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness. 1 Tim 5:19 Do not entertain an accusation against an elder unless it is brought by two or three witnesses. FAIR EVIDENCE Now if we use these principles of ‘fairness’ in a secular court, surely they should apply to allegations made concerning events in church history. Yet many of the evidences offered by anti-Christmas lobbyists are based on hearsay, assumptions loosely based on circumstantial evidence, or even arguments from silence. 1) PAGAN ORIGIN Let’s look at the first objection: 1) Pagan origin a. The Bible is silent on the date of Jesus birth. b. Therefore the December 25th date for Christmas and the many associated customs must all come from pagan sources. c. Hence all Christmas celebrations are pagan. SILENCE a. THE BIBLE IS SILENT ON JESUS’ BIRTH DATE. It is true that the exact year of Jesus’ birth is unknown, although historians place it some time between 7 BC and 2 BC. The day and month is also unknown. Narratives of Jesus’ birth are included in two of the gospels (Matthew & Luke), but the Bible is silent on the issue of Jesus’ birth date. If it was really important, God would have told us in His Word. But you cannot make a conclusive argument either way, based on the silence of Scripture. THE EARLY CHURCH The early church had opinions about the birth date of Jesus, but were by no means in total agreement. Clement of Alexandria (150-215 AD) recorded that “there are those who have determined not only the year of our Saviour’s genesis, but even the day, which they say took place in the twenty-eighth year of Augustus on the 25th of Pachon… Indeed, others say that he came to be on the 24th or 25th of Pharmuthi.” 1 He gives 2 possibilities, both on the 25th day of a Coptic (Egyptian) calendar month. Pachon was the ninth month of the Coptic calendar (9 May to 7 June on the Gregorian calendar). Pharmuthi was the eighth month of the Coptic calendar (9 April to 8 May on the Gregorian calendar). 1 Stromata, 1.21.145-146 THE EARLY CHURCH Origen (184/5–253/4) pointed out 1 that in the Scriptures only sinners celebrated their birthdays. As such he claimed that Christians should not celebrate birthdays. Ex 40:20 Now the third day was Pharaoh’s birthday, and he gave a feast for all his officials… Mark 6:21 Finally the opportune time came. On his birthday Herod gave a banquet for his high officials and military commanders and the leading men of Galilee. This idea of not celebrating birthdays has been adapted by the Jehovah’s Witness cult. 1 Lev. Hom. viii in Migne, P.G., XII, 495 WINTER OR SUMMER Some attempt to make an argument from Scripture that the census of Augustus would have been impossible in winter (i.e. December to February in the Northern hemisphere). But others counter by saying that it must have been in winter, because it was only then that field labour was suspended. Also the Romans were not known for their consideration towards their subjects; the coldness of winter would have been a non-issue to Emperor Augustus them when calling a census. (63 BC – 14 AD) WINTER OR SUMMER Some further argue from Scripture that Jesus’ birth could not have been in winter because the shepherds would not have been out in the fields as seen in Luke 2. WINTER OR SUMMER But according to Richard P. Myers, “… it is very possible that this scene could have taken place in winter in Israel. Israel has a very moderate climate, and mild winters, much like southern California. In fact, our family made a trip to Israel in December 1989. The weather was mild; we wore short sleeves and no coats some of the time. We personally passed by several fields in which shepherds were out in the fields, watching over the sheep as they were grazing.” 1 1 http://www.tbclacey.org/resources/PDF%20 Articles/Should%20We%20Celebrate%20 Christmas%20-%20Richard%20Myers.pdf 1) PAGAN ORIGIN b. BECAUSE THE BIBLE IS SILENT, THE DEC 25TH DATE MUST COME FROM PAGAN SOURCES. Examining the actual documentary evidence: While there are peripheral customs linked to current Christmas celebrations which have pagan origins, the only documented arguments for the December 25th date actually come from Christian sources. 1) PAGAN ORIGIN The tradition of December 25th as Jesus’ birthday is actually quite old, dating from the 2nd century and not the 4th as many claim. The earliest known testimony is Theophilus, Bishop of Caesarea (AD 115-181): We ought to celebrate the birth-day of our Lord on what day soever the 25th of December shall happen. 1 1 Magdeburgenses, Cent. 2. c. 6. Hospinian, de orign Festorum Chirstianorum 1) PAGAN ORIGIN Around 202-211 AD Hippolytus of Rome also argued that this was the date. In his Commentary on Daniel he states: For the first advent of our Lord in the flesh, when he was born in Bethlehem, was December 25th, a Wednesday, while Augustus was in his forty-second year… 1 1 Some scholars claim that the Dec 25th date must have been added into this document at a later stage. Tom Schmidt of Chronicon.net investigated the matter and published findings defending the Dec 25th date online at: http://chronicon.net/blog/chronology /hippolytus-and-the-original-date-of-christmas/ Hippolytus (170-235) 1) PAGAN ORIGIN Sextus Julius Africanus 1 wrote a history of the world (Chronographiai 2) from creation to the year 221 AD and calculated that the world was created on March 25th. He believed that Jesus’ conception marked the start of the new creation and that it was fitting that it would be on exactly the same date. If the conception of Jesus was indeed on March 25th, accordingly his birth would be nine months later on December 25th. While we may question Julius’ rationale and calculations, it is clear that his reason for choosing Dec 25th was not based on any association with a pagan festival. 1 A Christian historian of the late 2nd and early 3rd century AD who influenced Eusebius and other Christian historians. 2 The 5-book work is no longer extant, but copious extracts from it are found in the Chronicon of Eusebius. 1) PAGAN ORIGIN Hippolytus in his own Chronicon makes similar claims to Julius Africanus: “… Hippolytus indicates that Jesus was in fact born on December 25 because he claims that Jesus was born nine months from the anniversary of the creation of the world. Because the Chronicon indicates that the world was created on March 25, the vernal equinox, nine months from this date is of course December 25. From this we can safely say that, sometime between 202 and 211 AD, Hippolytus marked December 25th as the birthday of Jesus. This clearly had nothing to do with Pagan festivals, but was derived from the idea that Jesus was conceived on the Passover.” 1 1 http://chronicon.net/blog/chronology/hippolytus-and-the-original-date-of- christmas/ 1) PAGAN ORIGIN Another reason why some early Christians chose Dec 25th as Jesus birth date is as follows.
Recommended publications
  • Jewish Occupational Selection: Education, Restrictions, Or Minorities?
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Botticini, Maristella; Eckstein, Zvi Working Paper Jewish Occupational Selection : Education, Restrictions, or Minorities? IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1224 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Botticini, Maristella; Eckstein, Zvi (2004) : Jewish Occupational Selection : Education, Restrictions, or Minorities?, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1224, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20477 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially
    [Show full text]
  • 2210 Bc 2200 Bc 2190 Bc 2180 Bc 2170 Bc 2160 Bc 2150 Bc 2140 Bc 2130 Bc 2120 Bc 2110 Bc 2100 Bc 2090 Bc
    2210 BC 2200 BC 2190 BC 2180 BC 2170 BC 2160 BC 2150 BC 2140 BC 2130 BC 2120 BC 2110 BC 2100 BC 2090 BC Fertile Crescent Igigi (2) Ur-Nammu Shulgi 2192-2190BC Dudu (20) Shar-kali-sharri Shu-Turul (14) 3rd Kingdom of 2112-2095BC (17) 2094-2047BC (47) 2189-2169BC 2217-2193BC (24) 2168-2154BC Ur 2112-2004BC Kingdom Of Akkad 2234-2154BC ( ) (2) Nanijum, Imi, Elulu Imta (3) 2117-2115BC 2190-2189BC (1) Ibranum (1) 2180-2177BC Inimabakesh (5) Ibate (3) Kurum (1) 2127-2124BC 2113-2112BC Inkishu (6) Shulme (6) 2153-2148BC Iarlagab (15) 2121-2120BC Puzur-Sin (7) Iarlaganda ( )(7) Kingdom Of Gutium 2177-2171BC 2165-2159BC 2142-2127BC 2110-2103BC 2103-2096BC (7) 2096-2089BC 2180-2089BC Nikillagah (6) Elulumesh (5) Igeshaush (6) 2171-2165BC 2159-2153BC 2148-2142BC Iarlagash (3) Irarum (2) Hablum (2) 2124-2121BC 2115-2113BC 2112-2110BC ( ) (3) Cainan 2610-2150BC (460 years) 2120-2117BC Shelah 2480-2047BC (403 years) Eber 2450-2020BC (430 years) Peleg 2416-2177BC (209 years) Reu 2386-2147BC (207 years) Serug 2354-2124BC (200 years) Nahor 2324-2176BC (199 years) Terah 2295-2090BC (205 years) Abraham 2165-1990BC (175) Genesis (Moses) 1)Neferkare, 2)Neferkare Neby, Neferkamin Anu (2) 3)Djedkare Shemay, 4)Neferkare 2169-2167BC 1)Meryhathor, 2)Neferkare, 3)Wahkare Achthoes III, 4)Marykare, 5)............. (All Dates Unknown) Khendu, 5)Meryenhor, 6)Neferkamin, Kakare Ibi (4) 7)Nykare, 8)Neferkare Tereru, 2167-2163 9)Neferkahor Neferkare (2) 10TH Dynasty (90) 2130-2040BC Merenre Antyemsaf II (All Dates Unknown) 2163-2161BC 1)Meryibre Achthoes I, 2)............., 3)Neferkare, 2184-2183BC (1) 4)Meryibre Achthoes II, 5)Setut, 6)............., Menkare Nitocris Neferkauhor (1) Wadjkare Pepysonbe 7)Mery-........, 8)Shed-........, 9)............., 2183-2181BC (2) 2161-2160BC Inyotef II (-1) 2173-2169BC (4) 10)............., 11)............., 12)User......
    [Show full text]
  • The Maccabees
    The Maccabees Written by Steven G. Rhodes Copyright Case# 1-3853893102 Date: Nov 26, 2016 Steven G. Rhodes 1830 NW 1st Ave., Apt D. Gainesville, FL 32603 305-766-5734 941-227-5997 stevengrhodes @yahoo.com REM: Order of Day 8 Chanukah: Circa 1930’s Europe. (hidden until ACT III) REM: WATCH JUDITH MOVIES ON NETFLIX. REM: WATCH ADAM AT SOLSTICE MOVIES OJ NETFLIX REM: WATCH LEVIATHAN MOVIES ON NETFLIX 1 REM PROLOGUE: READ BY NARRATOR (RABBI DALLMAN) 1 Hanukkah is celebrated for eight days beginning on the 25th of Kislev (mid- to late-December). Since Hanukkah falls four days before the new moon (the darkest night of the month) and close to the winter solstice (the longest night of the year), it seems only natural that a key element of this holiday is light. In fact, one of its other names is the "Feast of Lights" (along with "Feast of Dedication" and "Feast of the Maccabees"). The only essential ritual of Hanukkah is the lighting of candles. The Hanukkah candles are held in a chanukkiah, a candelabra that holds nine candles. (The chanukkiah is different from a menorah, which is a candelabra that holds seven candles and is pictured on the official emblem of the State of Israel.) The candle (shammash) in the middle of the chanukkiah is used to light the others. The idea of a seder is of course best known from Passover, where a progression of 15 steps shapes a complicated process that allows us to re-live and re-experience the Exodus from Egypt. In the same way, we are used to daily and Shabbat services flowing through a fixed progression of prayers found in the siddur [prayerbook] (from the same root as seder).
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Christian's Perspective on the Mysteries of the Rosary
    1 An Early Christian’s Perspective on the Mysteries of the Rosary April 27, 2018 2 This work is dedicated to my mother who has never stopped praying for me. She has shown me the way to Jesus is through his mother. Ichthys1,2 1 ΙΧΘΥΣ (ichthys), a Greek word meaning “fish” is an acronym for "Ἰησοῦς Χριστός, Θεοῦ Υἱός,Σωτήρ" (Iēsous Christos, Theou Yios, Sōtēr; which translates into English as "Jesus Christ, Son of God, Saviour". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichthys 2 The symbol of the fish was used by early Christian to recognize other Christians. A Christian would draw either the top or bottom line in the dust and if the other person was a Christian he or she would complete the symbol. April 27, 2018 3 Table of Contents An Early Christian’s Perspective on the Mysteries of the Rosary ................................................................. 1 Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Credits ................................................................................................................................................. 14 Caveat ................................................................................................................................................. 15 Joyful Mysteries ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geschichtsbücher Des Alten Testaments Und Biblische Geschichte (Außerhalb Der Urgeschichte Gen 1–11)
    © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Augsburg 2011, Version 2018 Geschichtsbücher des Alten Testaments und biblische Geschichte (außerhalb der Urgeschichte Gen 1–11) Inhalt: 1. Vorbemerkung zu den Datierungen für die biblische Geschichte.............................................................................1 2. Die fünf Bücher Mose...............................................................................................................................................2 3. Das Buch Genesis.....................................................................................................................................................3 3.1. Zu Abraham..........................................................................................................................................3 3.2. Isaak, Jakob und Esau...........................................................................................................................8 3.3. Joseph und seine Brüder.......................................................................................................................8 4. Moses und das Buch Exodus...................................................................................................................................11 5. Die Bücher Levitikus, Numeri und Deuteronomium...............................................................................................27 6. Das Buch Josua.......................................................................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Mary, the Mother of Jesus
    12/13/2018 www.biblesearchers.com/yahshua/davidian/dynasty2.shtml#LukeMaryLineage Return to the Home Page | Translate this Page The Virgin and Child with Balaam the Prophet – Earliest Known Image of Mary and the Infant Jesus in the 2nd Century Catacomb of Priscilla in Rome. (Numbers 24:7) The Political and Royal Heritage of Miriam, the Chosen Princess, As the Mother of the Jewish Messiah The Ancestors of Jesus in First and Second Century Judea BCE By Robert Mock M.D. [email protected] December 2007 Book One Chapter Two Topics The “Madonna and Child” Mary, the Most Famous and Revered Woman in History The House of Zadok The Gospel of Luke Lineage to Jesus through His Mother, Mary Heli, the Davidian Prince - the Father of the Maiden called Miriam Hannah, the Levite - the Mother of the Maiden called Miriam Prince Mattathias and Princess Alexandra II - The Paternal Grandparents of the Maiden, Miriam The Wives and Children of Mattathias, (Mattat ben Levi) Elizabeth of Jerusalem - The Mother of Heli (Prince Alexander Helios III) The Hasmonean Kings of Judea Rachel of Arimathea - The Mother of Joseph of Arimathea Salome of Jerusalem - The Mother of Prince Gjor Joseph of Arimathea - The Rich Man of Jerusalem “Mary the daughter of Heli” in the Jerusalem Talmud Lineages The House of Zadok The Gospel of Luke Lineage to Jesus through His Mother, Mary The Wives and Children of Mattathias, (Mattat ben Levi) The Hasmonean Kings of Judea The “Madonna and Child” This picture of the “Madonna and Child” comes from the Catacomb of Priscilla. It is the oldest known pictorial representation of Mary touching and caressing her firstborn son.
    [Show full text]
  • A Battle 2000 Years in the Making Luke 3:1-2
    John the Baptist A battle 2000 years in the making Luke 3:1-2 EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Luke 3 1 Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, when Pontius Pilate was governor of Judea, and Herod was tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip was tetrarch of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias was tetrarch of Abilene, 2 in the high priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came to John, the son of Zacharias, in the wilderness. EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Genesis 25 •19 Now these are the records of the generations of Isaac, Abraham’s son: Abraham became the father of Isaac; 20 and Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah, the daughter of Bethuel the Aramean of Paddan-aram, the sister of Laban the Aramean, to be his wife. 21 Isaac prayed to the Lord on behalf of his wife, because she was barren; and the Lord answered him and Rebekah his wife conceived. 22 But the children struggled together within her; and she said, “If it is so, why then am I this way?” So she went to inquire of the Lord. 23 The Lord said to her, “Two nations are in your womb; And two peoples will be separated from your body; And one people shall be stronger than the other; And the older shall serve the younger.” EUAGGELION KATA LOUKAN Genesis 25 24 When her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb. 25 Now the first came forth red, all over like a hairy garment; and they named him Esau.
    [Show full text]
  • The Library of the Dead Sea Scroll Qumran Community Scriptorium
    Presentation title as announced in Program Book: “The Theology, Halakhah, Politics, and Esotericism of the DSS Essene Sect Compared with Normative Rabbinic Practices and that of the Second Temple Sadducees” by David B. Levy David B. Levy received a Ph.D. in Jewish philosophy, rabbinics, and biblical studies in 2002. In 1994, he received a M.L.S. from UMCP. He previously served as a librarian and taught in the high school at Ner Israel. David participates in NYMA. One of his websites is at http://student.ccbcmd.edu/~dlevy11/index.html. Description As well as a brief general overview of the DSS library, the differences revealed by the contents of DSS texts in theology between Essenes, Sadducees, and Pharisees will be illustrated by looking at the topics of predestination, immortality, dualism, apocalyptic messianism, and angelology. Differences in halakhah will be illustrated by touching on the laws regarding halah, peru u-revu, pikuah nefesh, li-fenim mi-shurat ha-din, oils, mikvaot immersions, harvesting the omer, tevel yom relating to the parah adumah, and some differences in Shabbat observances. The method of my approach is to compare DSS theology, politics, and halakhah with the evolution of mainstream Rabbinic traditions across history in order to illuminate, enhance, and increase our knowledge about Rabbinic observances, history, and practices The Library of the Dead Sea Scroll Qumran Community Scriptorium: Politics, Theology, and Halakhah of the DSS Essene sect compared with Normative Rabbinic Halakhah, Customs, and Tradition I. Introduction The Dead Sea Scrolls were in some minds the most important archeological find of the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • TRADE and SAVEI Woau SIHES
    TUESDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1988 A rm go Dally Net Press Ron PAGE TWENTY dlimrbrBtrr lEnntUtg iTritIh Per tiM Week ODdrC IS, 1988 ^ Hanrlfpfitpr lEuPtittig IJpraUi Three Manchester surea Mu- dents have been named to the TRADE ALLOWANCES 15,188 About Town dean’s Hst for terms 2 and S at Mencheifer—/4 City of FUlage Cfuarm J«bo*mh'a WltUMM* wtX oon- SSmira (N.T.) College. They (CiMnflEd AdvMtbSsg on JP m f BO) tfuct« thaocratlc ministry school are Miss BUeen CuUeton, FORBLACK and WHITE TV VOL. LXXXVIII, NO. 2 (THIRTY-SIX PAGES—TWO SECTIONS) MANCHESTER, CONN„ WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1968 toBlgbt 1A 7 '^ and a sarvlca daughter ot Mr. and Mm Chris­ maattin at t i l i at Kingdom topher CuUeton of IBB Oreen T R A D E Hall. Rd.; Mlsa MaUory D. Sohardt, d au ^ ter of Dr. and Mrs. Wal­ D m oommlssion on worship ot ter Schardt of 81 Bastland Dr., In U.N, Speech South Msthodlst CSturch will and Miss Cheryl E. Maron, TOWARD moot to n ig h t'^ 7;M at the d a u b e r of Mr. and Mrs. Clar­ church. ence O. Maron ot BB ’IVuikeroo- and S A V E sen Rd., Vernon. I COLOR TV LBJ Accepts Fortas’ The aocecutlve board ot Bent­ ley School PTA win meet to­ Martin Keiderllng wUl be the TURNPIKE TV OFFERS TRADE AUOW ANCES UP TO «125 FOR YOUR OLD BLACK and WHITE TV Husk Hits Soviet ^s night at B in the school audi­ leader of the Audult Discussion r ' torium.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literary Study of the Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan
    Scholastic Rabbinism A Literary Study of the Fathers according to Rabbi Nathan ANTHONY J. SALDARINI Scholastic Rabbinism BROWN UNIVERSITY BROWN JUDAIC STUDIES Edited by Jacob Neusner Wendell S. Dietrich, Ernest S. Frerichs, Alan Zuckerman Board of Editors David Altshuler, George Washington University David R. Blumenthal, Emory University Baruch M. Bokser, University of California, Berkeley Joel Gereboff, Arizona State University David Goldenberg, Dropsie University Robert Goldenberg, State University of New York, Stony Brook David Goodblatt, Haifa University William Scott Green, University of Rochester Peter Haas, Vanderbilt University Martin Jaffee, University of Virginia Shamai Kanter, Temple Beth El, Rochester, New York Jack L. Lightstone, Concordia University Irving Mandelbaum, University of Texas Alan Mintz, University of Maryland Alan J. Peck, Tulane University Gary G. Porton, University of Illinois Marc L. Raphael, Ohio State University Richard S. Sarason, Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion Tzvee Zahavy, University of Minnesota Editorial Committee: Roger Brooks Louis Newman Number 14 SCHOLASTIC RABBINISM A Literary Study of the Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan by Anthony J. Saldarini SCHOLASTIC RABBINISM A Literary Study of the Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan by Anthony J. Saldarini Scholars Press SCHOLASTIC RABBINISM A Literary Study of the Fathers According to Rabbi Nathan by Anthony J. Saldarini Copyright © 2020 by Brown University Library of Congress Control Number: 2019953407 Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/ Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommer- cial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/.
    [Show full text]
  • Visio-120-1 Small.Vsd
    120 BC 110 BC 100 BC 90 BC 80 BC 70 BC 60 BC 50 BC 40 BC 30 BC 20 BC 10 BC BC 1 | 1 AD Rome 44BC Caeser is Assassinated War Against The Cimbri & Julius Caesar (Gaius Julius Caesar) Caesar As Emperor Teutones 113-101BC 100-44BC 49-44BC Octavian (Augustus Caesar) 31BC-14AD 2nd Triumvirate 1st Triumuirate Octavian, Mark Antony Octavius Defeated Pompey (Cnaeus Pompeius Magnus) Caesar, Crassus & Pompey 60-59BC & Lepidus 43-31BC Antony & Cleoptra 106-48BC At Actium In 31BC Pompey (Sole Consul) 52-48BC 49BC Caeser Crosses The Antiochus IX 115-95BC (19) 64BC Pompey Rubicon Made Syria A "The die is cast" Seleucus VI Roman Antiochus VIII 125-96BC(29) 95-64BC (31) Province Kingdom of the Seleucids 323-64BC Syria (The Smaritians) In Samria (Old Israel) Week 47 of 69 Week 48 of 69 Week 49 of 69 Week 50 of 69 Week 51 of 69 Week 52 of 69 Week 53 of 69 Week 54 of 69 Week 55 of 69 Week 56 of 69 Week 57 of 69 Week 58 of 69 Week 59 of 69 Week 60 of 69 Week 61 of 69 Week 62 of 69 Week 63 of 69 Week 64 of 69 63BC Pomey 4BC Herod’s Daniel’s vision of the 70 Made Palinstne Kingdom is divided weeks (Dan 9:20-27) - between his 3 sons Started on 14 Nisan Alexandra A Roman 37BC Herod Marries 445 BC & Ended 6th Leader Province Antigonus II's Niece Herod The Great April, A.D. 32 76-67BC (9) (Mariamne) And Usurps The Throne 37-4BC (33) Ananelus Joazar ben Boethus Aristobulus I High Priest Eleazar ben Boethus Aristobulus II High Priest Leader/High Priest 37-36 & 36-30BC High Priest Leader/High Priest 4BC 104-103BC 4-3BC Alexander Janneus John Hyrcanus II 66-63BC (3)
    [Show full text]
  • List of High Priests of Israel 1 List of High Priests of Israel
    List of High Priests of Israel 1 List of High Priests of Israel This page gives one list (partly traditional) of the High Priests of Ancient Israel up to the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD. Because of a lack of historical data, this list is incomplete and there may be gaps. Line of the High Priests of Israel The office did not always pass directly from father to son. The high priests, like all Jewish priests, belonged to the Aaronic line. The Bible mentions the majority of high priests before the captivity, but does not give a complete list of office holders. Lists would be based on various historical sources. In several periods of gentile rule, high priests were appointed and removed by kings. Still, most high priests came from the Aaronic line. One exception is Menelaus, who may not have been from the Tribe of Levi at all, but from the Tribe of Benjamin. From the Exodus to the Babylonian Exile • Aaron, during the Exodus from Egypt • Eleazar, son of Aaron • Phinehas, son of Eleazar • Abishua, son of Phineas According to the Samaritans, Shesha is incerted, said to be the son of Abishua and father to Bukki. A traditional list of the Jewish High Priests • Bukki, son of Abishua-ancestor of Ezra • Uzzi, son of Bukki • Eli, descendant of Itamar, son of Aaron [1] • Ahitub, son of Phinehas and grandson of Eli • Ahijah, son of Ahitub • Ahimelech, son of Ahitub, High Priest during the reign of King Saul; killed at Nob by Doeg; part of the curse on the House of Eli - that none of Eli's male descendants would live to old age - was fulfilled with the death of Ahimelech.
    [Show full text]