Bratsk Reservoir Perch Fishery MSC Public Comment Draft Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bratsk Reservoir Perch Fishery MSC Public Comment Draft Report 12 Petra Alekseeva str., PO Box 132 Moscow, Russia, 121471 Tel./fax: (495) 640-84-92 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://marcert.ru Bratsk Reservoir Perch Fishery MSC Public Comment Draft Report Co-clients: Bratsk Fish ltd., Bernard Wolf SA Conformance Assessment Body: Marine certification LLC Authors: Steve Nelson, Dmitry Sendek and Dmitry Lajus 22 December 2015 Document: MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 page 1 Date of issue: 8 October 2014 © Marine Stewardship Council, 2014 Table of Contents English-Russian Glossary ................................................................................................... 3 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 4 2. Authorship and Peer Reviewers .................................................................................... 6 3. Description of the Fishery .............................................................................................. 8 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Scope of Certification Sought ................................. 8 3.1.1 UoA and Unit of Certification (UoC) ...................................................................... 8 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background .............................................................. 12 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ..................................................................... 27 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background .................................................. 49 4. Evaluation Procedure .................................................................................................... 66 4.2 Previous assessments ............................................................................................... 66 4.3 Assessment Methodologies ....................................................................................... 66 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ...................................................................... 66 4.4.1 Site Visits .............................................................................................................. 66 4.4.2 Consultations ........................................................................................................ 67 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques ........................................................................................ 68 5. Traceability ..................................................................................................................... 69 5.1 Eligibility Date ............................................................................................................. 69 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery ..................................................................................... 69 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ............................................................ 71 6. Evaluation Results ......................................................................................................... 72 6.1 Principle Level Scores ............................................................................................... 72 6.2 Summary of PI Level Scores ..................................................................................... 72 6.3 Summary of Conditions .............................................................................................. 74 6.4 Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 75 6.5 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement ................................................... 75 7. References ...................................................................................................................... 76 Appendix 1 Scoring and Rationales ................................................................................. 80 Appendix 1.1 Performance Indicator Scores and Rationales ........................................... 80 Appendix 1.3 Conditions and Cient Action Plans .......................................................... 142 Appendix 2 Peer Reviewer reports…………………………………………………………..162 Appendix 3 Stakeholder submissions and Announcement.…………………………...184 Appendix 4 Surveillance Frequency ............................................................................... 189 Document: MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 page 2 Date of issue: 8 October 2014 © Marine Stewardship Council, 2014 English-Russian Glossary Fish names Amur carp – Амурский карп - Cyprinus rubrofuscus Amur catfish – Амурский сом - Parasilurua asotus Baikal cisco - Омуль байкальский – Coregonus migratorius Bream – Лещ – Abramis brama Burbot - Налим – Lota lota Dace - Елец – Leuciscus leuciscus Far-Eastern brook lamprey – дальневосточная ручьевая минога – Lethenteron reissneri Grayling - Хариус – Thymallus arcticus Lenok - Ленок – Brachymystax lenok Peled - Пелядь – Coregonus peled Perch - Окунь – Perca fluviatilis Pike - Щука – Esox lucius Prussian (crucian) carp – Карась- Carassius gibelio Roach - Плотва – Rutilus rutilus Siberian sturgeon - Осетр сибирский – Acipenser baeri Sterlet – Стерлядь – Acipenser ruthenus Taimen - Таймень – Hucho hucho Tugun - Тугун – Coregonus tugun Whitefish - Сиг сибирский – Coregonus lavaretus pidschian (See Table 3.10 for full list of fish in Bratsk Reservoir) Russian fishery management agencies ABTU -- Angara-Baikal Territorial Administration of FAR (ABTU) -- (Ангаро-Байкальское территоральное управление ФАР, АБТУ Baikalrybvod -- Federal state-financed organization “Baikal basin administration of fisheries and conservation of aquatic biological resources” (Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Байкальское бассейновое управление по рыболовству и сохранению водных биологических ресурсов» (ФГБУ «Байкалрыбвод») BSCFC -- Baikal Science - Commercial Fisheries Council. (Байкальский научно- промысловый совет) FAR --- Federal Fishery Agency (FAR) (Федеральное агентство по рыболовству или Росрыболовство Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Supervision (Rosselkhoznadzor) (Федеральная служба по ветеринарному и фитосанитарному надзору – Россельхлзнадзор). Gosrybtsentr - Federal State-financed Organization State Science-commercial center for Fisheries - (Федеральное государственное бюджетное научное учреждение Государственный научно- производственный центр рыбного хозяйства - Госрыбцентр), OAO Vostsibrybtsentr - East-Siberian Scientific Commercial Centre for Fisheries (Открытое акционерное Общество «Восточно-Сибирский научно-производственный центр рыбного хозяйства», Востсибрыбцентр) PC -- Public Council for Fisheries (PC) (Общественный совет по рыболовству), State Ecological Expertise (Государственная экологическая экспертиза). VNIRO -- All-Russia Institute for Fisheries Research and Oceanography VNIRO (Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт Рыболовства и Океанографии, ВНИРО. Document: MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template V2.0 page 3 Date of issue: 8 October 2014 © Marine Stewardship Council, 2014 1. Executive Summary Marine Certification, LLC assigned a three member fishery certification team to conduct a MSC fishery assessment of the Bratsk Reservoir perch fishery in Irkutsk oblast, Russia. Steve Nelson served as team leader and led the assessment for Principle 2: Ecosystem. Dr. Dmitry Sendek led assessment activities for Principle 1 and Dr. Dmitry Lajus for Principle 3. Mr. Nelson is an MSC certified Fishery Team Leader and Drs. Sendek and Lajus have MSC certification experience. All members of the team have worked in Russian fisheries. The certification process started with an MSC Pre-Assessment completed in March 2015. After assembling the assessment team, Marine Certification began the Full Assessment in June with a formal Announcement on the MSC website. The team conducted a site visit from 6 to 10 July in Bratsk and Irkutsk, Russia. During July and August the team reviewed results and scored the fishery according to the MSC Default Assessment Tree. In September the team completed the Prelimiminary Draft Report listing ten conditions. The fishery passed all three MSC principles with scores above 80 for each one. Co-Clients Bernard Wolf, SA in Chevroux, Switzerland Switzerland and Bratsk Fish ltd in Bratsk Russia responded to the ten conditions with a Client Action Plan in November. This Public Comment Draft Report (PCDR) summarizes the assessment process and recommends the Bratsk Reservoir perch fishery for MSC certification. Table 6.5: Final Principle Scores Final Principle Scores Principle Score Principle 1 – Target Species 83.3 Principle 2 – Ecosystem 80.3 Principle 3 – Management System 80.2 The Unit of Assessment is defined as the perch stock in Bratsk Reservoir harvested with trap nets from fishers operating in small boats. The Unit of Certification is defined as the perch stock harvested in trap nets by fishers of Bratsk Fish ltd. in the Bratsk district of Bratsk Reservoir operating in small boats. Scientists consider Bratsk Reservoir perch to be a unit stock and manage it with data and stock assessment models for whole reservoir. The entire Bratsk Reservoir extends 570 kilometers and covers three administrative districts: Bratsk, Balagansk, and Usolsk. In these districts fishers use three types of gear: trap nets, gill nets and beach seines. Fishers in Balagansk and Usolsk districts use more beach seines relative to trap nets and they target roach more often than perch. Fishers in the Bratsk district catch 96% of their perch catch in trap
Recommended publications
  • Fish and Fishing in Holocene Cis-Baikal, Siberia: a Review Robert J
    This article was downloaded by: [Robert Losey] On: 03 April 2012, At: 18:52 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uica20 Fish and Fishing in Holocene Cis-Baikal, Siberia: A Review Robert J. Losey a , Tatiana Nomokonova a & Dustin White b c a Department of Anthropology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada b Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK c Department of Archaeology, School of Humanities, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Available online: 29 Mar 2012 To cite this article: Robert J. Losey, Tatiana Nomokonova & Dustin White (2012): Fish and Fishing in Holocene Cis-Baikal, Siberia: A Review, The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 7:1, 126-145 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2011.611854 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bratsk-Ilimsk Territorial Production Complex: a Field Study Report
    THE BRATSK-ILIMSK TERRITORIAL PRODUCTION COMPLEX: A FIELD STUDY REPORT H. Knop and A. Straszak, Editore RR-78-2 May 1978 Research Reports provide the formal record of research conducted by the International lnstitute for Applied Systems Analysis. They are carefully reviewed before publication and represent, in the Institute's best judgment, competent scientific work. Views or opinions expressed therein, however, do not necessarily reflect those of the National Member Organizations supporting the lnstitute or of the lnstitute itself. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis A-236 1 Laxenburg, Austria Copyright @ 1978 IIASA AU ' hts reserved. No part of this publication may be repro7 uced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publieher. Preface The Management and Technology Area of IIASA has carried out case studies of large-scale development programs since 1975. The purpose of these studies is to examine successful programs of regional development from an international perspective, with a multidisciplinary team of scientists skilled in the use of systems analysis. The study of the Bratsk-Ilimsk Territorial Production Complex (BITPC) represents an interim effort in our research activities. The first study was of the Tennessee Valley Authority in the United States*, forthcoming is the study of the Shinkansen development program in Japan. The present Report covers six major aspects of the BITPC program: goals, variants, and strategies; planning and organization; model calculations and computer applications; integration of environmental factors; energy supply systems; and water resources. It is hoped that the experience of the Soviet scientists and practitioners and the observations and suggestions of the study team will ~rovidethe IIASA National Member Organizations" with insights into problem solving in the management, planning, and organization of large-scale development programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Homologous Series by Chromosome Number and the Genome Rearrangements in the Phylogeny of Salmonoidei Yu
    Russian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 38, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1115–1120. Translated from Genetika, Vol. 38, No. 10, 2002, pp. 1317–1323. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2002 by Zelinsky, Makhrov. THEORETICAL PAPERS AND REVIEWS Homologous Series by Chromosome Number and the Genome Rearrangements in the Phylogeny of Salmonoidei Yu. P. Zelinsky1 and A. A. Makhrov2 1 Department of Zoology, Tolstoy Tula State Pedagogical University, Tula, 300026 Russia 2 Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991 Russia; e-mail: [email protected] Received February 19, 2002 Abstract—Published data on chromosome numbers of Salmonoidei are summarized. The existence of homol- ogous variation of chromosome number in different phyletic lines of this suborder is substantiated. It is sug- gested that the origin of homologous series is related to major genome rearrangements (simultaneous fusion of several chromosomes). STRUCTURE AND ORIGIN mon ancestor of Salmonoidei had 112 chromosomes OF THE GROUP and 144 to 156 chromosome arms [13]. The reports karyological diversity in animals [1], in particular, in vertebrates [2] including fish [3], are cur- KARYOTYPES rently available. The ample evidence accumulated in lit- OF THE EXTANT SALMONOIDEI erature provides the possibility to elucidate the regulari- ties of karyotype evolution in individual fish taxa. In this To date, karyotypes have been studied in several work, we summarized the published data on the karyo- dozens of Salmonoidei species (Fig. 1). As it is impos- types of the members of the suborder Salmonoidei. sible to provide all references to original works within According to the classification [4] that we follow in the limits of this review, we used the data from pub- this work, this suborder includes the families Salmo- lished reviews [3, 13, 16–18, 28–30].
    [Show full text]
  • (Coregonidae) Artificial Reproduction in Russia
    Department of artificial fish reproduction, Siberian Research and Design Institute of Fish Industry “SIBRYBNIIPROJECT” Authors: Y.P. Mamontov, A.I. Litvinenko, S.M. Semenchenko, S.E. Palubis, O.S. Simonova [email protected] Current Condition of Whitefish (Coregonidae) Artificial Reproduction in Russia Speaker - Simonova Olga 09.2001 Coregonus sardinella Coregonus peled Coregonus autumnalis Coregonus muksun Main whitefish production areas Table 1 – Actual and potential whitefish production values (thousand tons) Actual production Potential production Natural Artificial Region 1940- 1970- 1990- reproductionreproduction Total 1960- 1980- Northern-East and 1.6- 1.3- North of European 3-4 2.0 5-6 7-8 2.5 1.7 territory of Russia 0.1- 1.3- 1.3- Ural 0.1 8-9 8-9 0.8 2.8 1.6 Western Siberia 10-17 6-17* 4-9** 9.0 19-24 26-30 Eastern Siberia 10-17 8-10 6-9 12.0 6-7 18-21 Far East (from Chukotka until Amur 2-3 2-3 1-2 2.0 2 4 river) TOTAL 25-34 19-28 10-17 25 40-45 65-70 * includes 5000 tons of artificial reproduction ** includes 1000 tons of artificial reproduction Table 2 − Approximate production of whitefish in water bodies of Russia in 2001, in tons Species Lakes Rivers Water reservoirs Total Stenodus leucichthys - 184 - 184 Coregonus muksun - 1443 - 1443 Coregonus peled 918 2342 40 3300 Coregonus nasus 10 1055 - 1065 Coregonus lavaretus 442 1376 134 1952 Coregonus albula 1813 20 251 2084 Coregonus sardinella - 3755 - 3755 Coregonus autumnalis 2805 353 180 3328 Coregonus tugun -20 - 20 Total 6088 10548 635 17271 Location of whitefish egg collecting farms and incubation units in Russia (2001) egg collecting farms incubation units Hatching recipient 3 4 5 6 7 2 8 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • A Cyprinid Fish
    DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliotheque 01005886 c.i FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. Circular No. 65 RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B0C. Circular No. 65 9^ RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS ^5, Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FOREWORD This short Russian-English glossary is meant to be of assistance in translating scientific articles in the fields of aquatic biology and the study of fishes and fisheries. j^ Definitions have been obtained from a variety of sources. For the names of fishes, the text volume of "Commercial Fishes of the USSR" provided English equivalents of many Russian names. Others were found in Berg's "Freshwater Fishes", and in works by Nikolsky (1954), Galkin (1958), Borisov and Ovsiannikov (1958), Martinsen (1959), and others. The kinds of fishes most emphasized are the larger species, especially those which are of importance as food fishes in the USSR, hence likely to be encountered in routine translating. However, names of a number of important commercial species in other parts of the world have been taken from Martinsen's list. For species for which no recognized English name was discovered, I have usually given either a transliteration or a translation of the Russian name; these are put in quotation marks to distinguish them from recognized English names.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functioning of Erosion-Channel Systems of the River Basins of the South of Eastern Siberia
    geosciences Article The Functioning of Erosion-channel Systems of the River Basins of the South of Eastern Siberia Olga I. Bazhenova 1,*, Aleksandr V. Bardash 1, Stanislav A. Makarov 1, Marina Yu. Opekunova 1, Sergei A. Tukhta 1 and Elizaveta M. Tyumentseva 2 1 V.B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS, Irkutsk 664033, Russia; [email protected] (A.V.B.); [email protected] (S.A.M.); [email protected] (M.Y.O.); [email protected] (S.A.T.) 2 Geographical Department, Pedagogical Institute of Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk 664033, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-3952426920 Received: 23 March 2020; Accepted: 6 May 2020; Published: 11 May 2020 Abstract: We revealed the regional features of the functioning of the erosion-channel systems of the Angara, Upper Lena, Selenga, and Upper Amur basins in the south of Eastern Siberia and examined the action of sloping non-channel, temporary, and permanent channel water flows, and presented the patterns of the spatial distribution of soil and gully erosion belts. The development conditions and factors of fluvial processes are considered and the role of cryogenic processes in the increasing activity of water flows is emphasized. The interdecadal dynamic cycles of the erosion-accumulative processes are revealed. A quantitative assessment of soil loss from erosion on agricultural land in the forest-steppe basins was carried out. We made an assessment of the plane deformation of the upper course of the Lena river (Siberian platform) and Irkut (Baikal rift zone and the Irkutsk-Cheremkhovo plain) using cartographic sources of different times, aerial photographs, and satellite imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • S-236503 COMPLETO.Pdf
    TECNICOS CIENTIFICOS S£ivrv4 LITERARIOS AGENCIA'EXPOENTE 1 SPAULO - R.SILV.MARTINS.53 TFL.33-2744 E 32-9797-CX.P03T.5S14 Instituto Oceanografico BIBLIOTECA CATALOGUE OF THE FISHES IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM. BY ALBERT GUNTHER, M.A., M.D., PH.D., F.Z.S., ETC., ETC. VOLUME SIXTH. LONDON: PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES. 1866. CATALOGUE OF THF, PHYSOSTOMI, CONTAINING THE FAMILIES SALMONID^E, PERCOPSID^E, GALAXID.E. MORMYRID^-E, GYMNARCHID^E, ESOCID^E, UMBRID^E, SCOMBRESOCIDyE, CYPRINODONTID^E, IN THE COLLECTION OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM. BY DR. ALBERT GUNTHER. Instituto Oceanogr&fico REG N. .-3.2JE S. PATTT.O %o.S- S3. LONDON: PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE TRUSTEES. 1866. PBEFACE. DK. GUNTHEB observes,—" This volume contains the continuation of the families of Physostomi. At the commencement of my account of this order it was my intention to adopt it with the limits assigned to it by Muller, and to distinguish the Scombresoces as a distinct order, viz. Malacopterygii pliaryngognathi; however, during the progress of a detailed examination of these fishes so many points of affinity with the Cyprinodontes became apparent, that I was reluctantly obliged to deviate still more from Muller's ordinal division. " The Salmonidae and the vast literature on this family offer so many and so great difficulties to the Ichthyologist, that as much patience and time are required for the investigation of a single species as in other fishes for that of a whole family. The ordinary method followed by naturalists in distinguishing and determining species, is here utterly inadequate; and I do not hesitate to assert that no one, however experienced in the study of other families of fishes, will be able to find his way through this labyrinth of varia­ tions without long preliminary study, and without a good collection for constant comparison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Angara Triangle Sia , Located in South-Eastern Siberia in the Basins of Angara River, Lena, and Bratsk Severobaikalsk Nizhnyaya Tunguska Rivers
    IRKUTSK REGION WELCOMES YOU Irkutsk Region (Russian: “Иркутская область”, Irkutskaya oblast) is regional administrative unit within Siberian Federal District of Rus- The Angara Triangle sia , located in south-eastern Siberia in the basins of Angara River, Lena, and Bratsk SeveroBAIKALsk Nizhnyaya Tunguska Rivers. The admin- istrative center is the city of Irkutsk. Russian presence in the area dates back to the 17th century, as the Russian Tsardom expanded eastward following the conquest of the Khanate of Sibir in 1582. By the end of the 17th century Irkutsk was a small town. Since the 18th century in Irkutsk the trades and crafts began to develop, the gold and silver craftsmen, smiths appeared, the town grew up to become soon the center of huge Irkutsk Province from where even former `Alaska was governed. Irkutsk The Angara Triangle f you live in the United States or in India , then With no doubt the Angara river is a gem of Eastern Si- the word “Angara” can bring instant images either beria which value is hard to overestimate. It is the river of of Senator Ed Angara calling for the shift to re- true love appreciated by the native Siberian, and this An- I newable energy and supporting green jobs, or the gara Gem is not just a physical stretch of river banks or a Tandoori chicken cooked over red hot coal called “anga- huge surrounding terrain. It is an ancient ethno-genetic ra” in classic Indian restaurant . One may also remember landscape of living of the native people and settled Russians an important character in the “Mahabharata-Krishna” of Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Vasilina Orlova 2021
    Copyright by Vasilina Orlova 2021 The Dissertation Committee for Vasilina Orlova certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Citizens of the Future: Infrastructures of Belonging in Post-Industrial Eastern Siberia Committee: Craig Campbell, Supervisor Kamran Asdar Ali Kathleen Stewart Serguei Oushakine Maria Sidorkina Citizens of the Future: Infrastructures of Belonging in Post-Industrial Eastern Siberia by Vasilina Orlova Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2021 In memory of my grandfather Vasily Orlov. On February 4, 1961, while clearing the road at the Angara River on a lespromkhoz bulldozer, he crashed through ice to his death. Acknowledgments I am thankful to my grandmother and my interlocutors, including those whom I do not portray nor mention, for their time and attention. While most of the names here are changed, I preserved the names of my grandparents—Valentina Orlova and Vasily Orlov. Many thanks to people who welcomed me in the villages of Anosovo, Karda, Bolshoi Lug, Muia, the towns of Ust Uda, Ust Baley, Ust Kut, Balagansk, and the cities of Bratsk, Irkutsk, and Severobaikalsk. For reading parts of this writing, often in very preliminary drafts, I am grateful to myprofes- sors Kamran Asdar Ali, Craig Campbell, Kathleen Stewart, Serguei Oushakine, Maria Sidorkina, John Hartigan, Elizabeth Keating, Jason Cons, James Slotta, Courtney Handman, Marina Peterson, Ward Keeler, as well as to my colleagues and friends—some of them are also professors now— Rick W.G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefit-Risk Analysis of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids and Heavy Metals in Seven
    1 1 The benefit-risk analysis of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and heavy metals in seven 2 smoked fish species from Siberia 3 4 Michail I. Gladyshev a,b,*,Olesia V. Anishchenkoa, Olesia N. Makhutovaa,b, Olesia V. 5 Kolmakovaa, Maria Y. Trusova M.Y.a,b, Vasiliy N. Morgunc, Iliada V. Gribovskayaa, Nadezhda 6 N. Sushchika,b 7 8 aInstitute of Biophysics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Akademgorodok, 9 50/50, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia 10 bSiberian Federal University, Svobodny av. 79, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russia 11 сFederal Regional Center for Standardization, Metrology and Testing in the Krasnoyarsk 12 Region, 1a Vavilov Str., Krasnoyarsk, 660093, Russia 13 14 * Corresponding author at:Institute of Biophysics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of 15 Sciences, Akademgorodok, 50/50, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia 16 E-mail address: [email protected] (M.I.Gladyshev), telephone +7 902 920 8903 17 18 19 Abstract 20 21 In cold smoked species of genus Coregonus, identified by molecular genetic analysis, contents of 22 fatty acids and heavy metals and arsenic were measured. The highest content of sum of long- 23 chain polyunsaturated fatty acids of omega-3 family (LC-PUFA), namely eicosapentaenoic 24 (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) fatty acids, 6.53±0.78 mg g-1 wet weight, was characteristic 25 of tugun Coregonus tugun. This is the first quantitative estimation (mg LC-PUFA per g of 26 product) of the nutritive value of smoked fish. Thus, to obtain a daily personal doze of 2 27 EPA+DHA of 1 g, recommended for prevention of cardiovascular diseases, one needs to 28 consume 153 g of the smoked tugun.
    [Show full text]
  • GENUS Brachymystax Gunther, 1866
    FAMILY Salmonidae Jarocki (or Schinz), 1822 - salmonids SUBFAMILY Salmoninae Jarocki (or Schinz), 1822 - salmonids [=Dermopteres, Salmonidi, Salmones, Tutriformes (Truttiformes), Salvelini, Brachymystini, Oncorhynchus, Huchoninae, Salmothymini, Salvelinini, Parahuchoninae] GENUS Brachymystax Gunther, 1866 - lenoks, Asiatic trout, Manchurian trout Species Brachymystax lenok (Pallas, 1773) - sharp-snouted lenok [=coregonoides, swetowidowi] Species Brachymystax savinovi Mitrofanov, 1959 - Russian lenok Species Brachymystax tsinlingensis Li, 1966 - Yangtze lenok Species Brachymystax tumensis Mori, 1930 - blunt-snouted lenok [=czerskii] GENUS Hucho Gunther, 1866 - salmonids [=Epitomynis] Species Hucho bleekeri Kimura, 1934 - Bleeker's hucho Species Hucho hucho (Linnaeus, 1758) - huchen, huchen trout, Danube salmon [=germanorum] Species Hucho ishikawae Mori, 1928 - Korean hucho Species Hucho taimen (Pallas, 1773) - taimen [=fluviatilis, lossos] GENUS Oncorhynchus Suckley, 1861 - salmonids [=Hypsifario, Paraoncorhynchus, Parasalmo] Species Oncorhynchus aguabonita (Jordan, 1892) - golden trout, California golden trout [=roosevelti, whitei] Species Oncorhynchus apache (Miller, 1972) - apache trout, Arizona trout Species Oncorhynchus chrysogaster (Needham & Gard, 1964) - Mexican golden trout Species Oncorhynchus clarkii (Richardson, 1837) - cutthroat trout [=alpestris, alvordensis, bathoecetor, behnkei, bouvieri, brevicauda, carinatus, carmichaeli, crescentis, declivifrons, eremogenes, evermanni, henshawi, humboldtensis, jordani, lewisi, macdonaldi,
    [Show full text]