Status of Rare Fish a Literature Review of Freshwater Fish in the UK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Status of Rare Fish a Literature Review of Freshwater Fish in the UK PROJECT 249 Status of Rare Fish A Literature Review of Freshwater Fish in the UK Institute of Freshwater Ecology National Rivers Authority Guardians of R&D Report 18 the Water Environment Status of Rare Fish A Literature Review of Freshwater Fish in the UK IJ Winfield, J M Fletcher and D Cragg-Hine Research Contractor: Institute of Freshwater Ecology National Rivers Authority Rivers House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS12 4UD LONDON: HMSO ENVIRONMENT AGENCY R&D Report 18 072875 National Rivers Authority Rivers House Waterside Drive Aztec West Bristol BS12 4UD Tel: 01454 624 400 Fax: 01454 624 409 © National Rivers Authority 1994 First Published 1994 ISBN 0-11-886511-0 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the National Rivers Authority. The views expressed in this document arc not necessarily those of the NRA. Its officers, servants or agents accept no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from the interpretation or use of the information, or reliance on views contained herein. Dissemination status Internal: Released to Regions External: Released to Public Domain Statement of use The information contained in this report is for use by NRA staff and others involved in the management of endangered fish species within Britain, in particular the Corego««i species. Research contractor This document was produced under NRA R&D Projcct 249 by: The Institute of Freshwater Ecology The Windermere Laboratory Far Sawrey Ambleside Cumbria LA22 OLP Tel: 015394 42468 Fax: 015394 46914 Project Leader The NRA’s Project Leader for R&D Project 249 was: David Cragg-Hine - NRA North West Region. Cover photograph of a vendace, Coregonus albula, courtesy of the Institute of Freshwater Ecology. This document was designed by: Stotts, 14 Frederick Place, Clifton, Bristol; and printed by TL Visuals, Rainbow Court, Armstrong Way, Yate. R&D Report 18 CONTENTS Page Executive Summary v Key Words v -1. Introduction 1 2. Methods 2 3. Rare British Freshwater Fishes 3 3.1 Conservation background 3 3.2 Rare species lists 3 3.3 Brief species rarity notes 5 3.4 Conclusions 6 4. Taxonomic Relationships of Coregonus Species 7 5. Occurrence of Coregonus Species 8 _6._Popu!ation.Biology.of-Coregom/$Species---------------------------------------------- 9----- 6.1 General aspects 9 6.2 Coregonus species outside Britain 9 6.3 Coregonus species in Britain 11 7. Reproduction of Coregonus Species 13 7.1 General aspects 13 7.2 Coregonus species outside Britain 13 7.3 Coregonus species in Britain 15 8. Feeding of Coregonus Species 18 8.1 General aspects 18 8.2 Coregonus species outside Britain 18 8.3 Coregonus species in Britain 20 9. Seasonal Distribution of Coregonus Species 22 9.1 General aspects _ 22 9.2 Coregonus species outside Britain 22 9.3 Coregonus species in Britain 23 R&D Report 18 10. Introspecific Variation in Coregonus Species 25 10.1 General aspects 25 10.2 Phenotypic variation 25 10.3 Genotypic variation 25 11. Breeding 27 11.1 General aspects 27 11.2 Conservation aspects 27 11.3 Practical aspects 27 11.4 Coregonus species in Britain 29 12. Conclusions on Coregonus Species 30 13. Concluding Remarks on Rare British Freshwater Fishes 31 References 32 List of Tables 3.1 The native British freshwater fish fauna 4 3.2 List of rare or potentially rare British freshwater fishes 5 List of Figures 4.1 Coregonus albula, vendace 7 4.2 Coregonus lavaretus, schelly, powan, gwyniad 7 R&D Report 18 iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Members of the Coregonus genus have been extensively studied in lakes of Europe and North America, A literature review was undertaken to identify reflecting the wide geographical distribution of these freshwater fish species which may be endangered in species, where they are exploited in commercial Britain, and to review existing knowledge of whitefish fisheries. Taxonomic relationships within the genus are (Coregonus spp.) ecology, genetic variability and still under investigation, partly as a result of the artificial breeding techniques. Literature published up to considerable intraspecific variation displayed by its December 1993 inclusive was covered, resulting in the members. Populations are relatively long-lived, although examination of c. 600 articles of which c. 200 arc cited in marked fluctuations or oscillations in abundance are this review. The comprehensive reference list was also common. Spawning usually occurs in shallow inshore produced on disk in ASCII file format. areas in the autumn, although some spring-spawning populations are known, with hatching taking place in In addition to the vendace Coregonus albula, whitefish the following spring. Zooplankton'is an'important C. lavaretus (more specifically known as schelly, component of the diet, although benthic gwyniad or powan), burbot Lota lota and allis shad macroinvertebrates are also taken. Both C. albula and Alosa alosa, which are all protected by the Wildlife and C. lavaretus inhabit the hypolimnion of lakes during the Countryside Act 1981, several other freshwater or day, rising at dusk to feed, but the latter species may estuarine species are also rare. Of the British freshwater also frequent the littoral zone. Techniques for the fishes with marine affinities, the sturgeon Acipenser artificial breeding of Coregonus species have developed sturio, twaite shad Aloso fallax, houting Coregonus significantly in recent years with the result that they oxyrinchus and smelt Osmerus eperlanus should be may now be reared under intensive aquaculture considered for future research. Within the strictly conditions on an exclusively artificial diet. freshwater group, the Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus requires immediate conservation action, as may the KEY WORDS spined loach Cobitis taenia. To these species may be added rudd Scardinius erythropbthalmus, crucian carp Literature review, rare fish, endangered fish, Coregonus Carassius carassius and silver bream Blicca bjoerkna albula, Coregonus lavaretus, vendace, schelly, gwyniad, which, although currently common in parts of Britain, conservation, eutrophication, species introductions. are considered to be under varying degrees of threat in Europe as a whole. R&D Report 18 v 1. INTRODUCTION with the major difficulty being the production of an objective rare species list for the present day. The aim of this literature review as stated in the Terms of Reference of the project is to review the extent of In contrast, the whitefish (Coregonus spp.) literature existing knowledge of whitefish ecology and genetic now amounts to at least hundreds and probably variability and of techniques for their artificial breeding thousands of articles. However, the vast majority of and rearing. In addition, the Terms of Reference also these publications originate from continental Europe require that this review should identify other species and North America, usually with fishery themes, and so which may be endangered in Britain and could be the their conclusions are not all directly applicable or subject of future research. relevant to the present review. With respect to the latter objective, considerations of A review of this nature could easily become tod long fish conservation are a relatively recent develop_ment and and exhaustive to be of practical use for the purpose for for a number of reasons lag behind most other areas of which it is intended. Consequently, at all times the animal conservation (Tudge 1990). This is particularly information reproduced here has been critically edited true of the U.K., with the result that the literature on to meet the aim of the Overall Project Objectives so that rare British freshwater fishes per se is very restricted. it helps to gather the information on these fish which is Thus, reviewing this field is relatively straightforward, necessary to safeguard their populations. R&D Report 18 1 2 . METHODS taxonomic basis, with major divisions being taxonomic relationships, ecology (occurrence, population biology, This review was carried out through extensive use of the reproduction, feeding and seasonal distribution), Library of the Freshwater Biological Association variation and breeding. housed at the Windermere Laboratory of the Institute of Freshwater Ecology, together with the authors’ In addition to the above published literature, there are personal reprint collection and, most importantly, direct also a number of unpublished Ph.D. theses dealing with contacts with individuals currently working in relevant the British coregonids. In rcccnt years, the feeding, areas. The latter approach is particularly important with growth and reproductive physiology of the powan respect to breeding studies, where developments can be (C. lavaretus) have been studied by Pomeroy (1987), very rapid, and in assessing the current rarity status of Brown (1989) and Rashid (1984) respectively, while the British freshwater fishes. Several as yet unpublished general biology of the gwyniad (C. lavaretus) was manuscripts were thus made available during the course investigated some time ago by Haram (1968). The of this review. The review was initially carried out in biology of the vendace (C. albula) and schelly late 1990, but it was subsequently updated in January (C. lavaretus) in the English Lake District were studied 1994 to cover all literature acquired by the Library recently by Mubamba (1989). during the intervening period. Unfortunately, the initial literature search revealed only Given the two major objectives, the review comprises three publications from the above theses, these being two main parts. Firstly, British freshwater fishes are Haram (1965) and Haram and Jones (1971) from Haram considered against a more general conservation (1968) and Brown and Scott (1990) from Brown (1989), background, and those which may now be considered while the update revealed the two additions of Brown et rare are specified and their classification briefly justified. al. (1991) from Brown (1989) and Pomeroy (1991) from Secondly, a more detailed review of Coregonus biology Pomeroy (1987).
Recommended publications
  • Intercalibration of Fish Assessments of Ecological Status in Northern Lakes – Results from a Pilot Study
    2010:1 Intercalibration of fish assessments of ecological status in Northern lakes – results from a pilot study Interkalibrering av fiskbaserade bedömningar av ekologisk status i nordiska sjöar – resultat från en pilotstudie KERSTIN HOLMGREN, ANDERS KINNERBÄCK Swedish Board of Fisheries, Institute of Freshwater Research, Sweden MIKKO OLIN Aquatic Sciencies, University of Helsinki, Finland TRYGVE HESTHAGEN, RANDI SAKSGÅRD Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Norway FIONA KELLY Central Fisheries Board, Republic of Ireland MARTTI RASK Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Finland Ansvarig utgivare: Axel Wenblad Redaktionskommitté: Ingemar Berglund, Joep de Leeuw, Kerstin Holmgren, Anders Kinnerbäck, Mikko Olin, Trygve Hesthagen, Randi Saksgård, Fiona Kelly, Martti Rask För beställning kontakta: Fiskeriverket Box 423, 401 26 Göteborg Telefon: 031-743 03 00 [email protected] Kostnad 50 kr, inklusive moms. Porto tillkommer. Rapporten kan också laddas ned från Fiskeriverkets hemsida: www.fiskeriverket.se ISSN 1404-8590 2010:1 Intercalibration of fish assessments of ecological status in Northern lakes – results from a pilot study Interkalibrering av fiskbaserade bedömningar av ekologisk status i nordiska sjöar – resultat från en pilotstudie KERSTIN HOLMGREN, ANDERS KINNERBÄCK [email protected]; [email protected] Swedish Board of Fisheries, Institute of Freshwater Research, Stångholmsvägen 2, SE-178 93 Drottningholm, Sweden MIKKO OLIN [email protected] Aquatic Sciencies, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Biocenter 3, POB 65, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland TRYGVE HESTHAGEN, RANDI SAKSGÅRD [email protected]; [email protected] Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tungasletta 2, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway FIONA KELLY [email protected] Central Fisheries Board, Swords Business Campus, Balheary Road, Swords, Co.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coregonus Lavaretus (L.)) Caused by Competitor Invasion
    Speciation Reversal in European Whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus (L.)) Caused by Competitor Invasion Shripathi Bhat1*, Per-Arne Amundsen1, Rune Knudsen1, Karl Øystein Gjelland3, Svein-Erik Fevolden1, Louis Bernatchez2, Kim Præbel1 1 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway, 2 Institut de Biologie Inte´grative et des Syste`mes (IBIS), Universite´ Laval, Que´bec, Canada, 3 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tromsø, Norway Abstract Invasion of exotic species has caused the loss of biodiversity and imparts evolutionary and ecological changes in the introduced systems. In northern Fennoscandia, European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus (L.)) is a highly polymorphic species displaying adaptive radiations into partially reproductively isolated and thus genetically differentiated sympatric morphs utilizing the planktivorous and benthivorous food niche in many lakes. In 1993, Lake Skrukkebukta was invaded by vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) which is a zooplanktivorous specialist. The vendace displaced the densely rakered whitefish from its preferred pelagic niche to the benthic habitat harbouring the large sparsely rakered whitefish. In this study, we investigate the potential influence of the vendace invasion on the breakdown of reproductive isolation between the two whitefish morphs. We inferred the genotypic and phenotypic differentiation between the two morphs collected at the arrival (1993) and 15 years after (2008) the vendace invasion using 16 microsatellite loci and gill raker numbers, the most distinctive adaptive phenotypic trait between them. The comparison of gill raker number distributions revealed two modes growing closer over 15 years following the invasion. Bayesian analyses of genotypes revealed that the two genetically distinct whitefish morphs that existed in 1993 had collapsed into a single population in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of a Coregonid Fish Species, Coregenus Albula (Linnaeus, 1758) (Salmoniformes: Salmonidae) in Aktaş Lake Shared Between Turkey and Georgia
    J. Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment Vol. 25, No. 3: 325-332 (2019) SHORT COMMUNICATION First record of a coregonid fish species, Coregenus albula (Linnaeus, 1758) (Salmoniformes: Salmonidae) in Aktaş Lake shared between Turkey and Georgia Sedat V. Yerli Department of Biology, Hacettepe University, SAL, Beytepe, Ankara, TURKEY Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract The genus Coregenus (Salmoniformes: Salmonidae) was recently considered not to be represented in Turkey. European cisco or vendace, Coregonus albula (Linnaeus, 1758) was reported for the first time for Turkey in this article with fifteen samples in Aktaş Lake, Ardahan. This species should be added to the checklist of Turkish fish fauna. Turkish name is proposed as “Akbalık” for this species. Keywords: Coregonus albula, first record, Aktaş Lake, Kartsakhi, alkaline lake, Georgia, Turkey Received: 30.10.2019, Accepted: 26.11.2019 Vendace or European cisco Coregonus albula (Linnaeus, 1758) is a native species for northern Europe. Berg (1948) reported the distribution of this species its morphological measurements in the former USSR and adjacent countries. Froese and Pauly (2019) summarized the natural distribution of vendace as Baltic basin, several lakes of upper Volga drainage; some lakes of White Sea basin and North Sea basin east of Elbe drainage; anadromous in Gulf of Finland and marine in northernmost freshened part of Gulf of Bothnia between Finland and Sweden; in Lake Inari, northern Finland; lower Rhine (now extirpated). The vendace was introduced, intentionally in some countries in Europe and United States of America. Vendace was introduced in 1959, 1982-1987 in the Irtysh River Basin and in 1960-61 in Lake Balkhash in Kazakhstan (Mitrofanov and Petr 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Temperature Preference of Juvenile Arctic Cisco
    TEMPERATURE PREFERENCE OF JUVENILE ARCTIC CISCO (COREGONUS AUTUMNALIS) FROM THE ALASKAN BEAUFORT SEA, IN RELATION TO SALINITY AND TEM PERATURE ACCLI~~TION by Robert G. Fechhelm LGL Ecological Research Associates, Inc. 1410 Cavitt Street Bryan, Texas 77081 William H. Neill Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843 and Benny J . Gallaway LGL Ecological Research Associates . Inc. 1410 Cavitt Street Bryan, Texas 77801 . 1 h lA flG I' ~ ;"riC 11"-' AN,) _H 707 ;.. SHiH AJ"C}1C<AGE. AI( 9'501 March 1982 2 ACKNOWLEDGEM ENTS We wish to express our gratitude to Dave Norton of the Outer Cont inental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program's Arctic Projects Office (or his support during all phases of the research. Thanks are also extended to the members of the Waterflood Monitoring Program survey team -- Bill Griffiths, Dave Schmidt, Brad Adams, Terry Carpenter, Rob Dillinger a nd Dennis Hensel -- who provided the fish for the experiment; to Scott And erson for his statistical a dvi c e ; to Chuck Davis for his help in c onstruct ing the test apparatus; to Bonnie Bower for drafting the figures; and to the s t a f f s of LGL Ecological Research Associates and LGL Alaska for their help a nd encouragement. This study was funded partially by the Bureau of Land Management through i n t e rag e nc y agreement with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as part of the Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program. 3 ABSTRACT Ho ri zont a l - t he r ma l - g r a d i e n t apparatus of previously undescr ibed design was used to determine the temperature preference of juvenile arctic cisco, (oreganus autumnalis, as a function of acclimation temperature and acclimation-test salinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Spawning and Early Life History of Mountain Whitefish in The
    SPAWNING AND EARLY LIFE HISTORY OF MOUNTAIN WHITEFISH IN THE MADISON RIVER, MONTANA by Jan Katherine Boyer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana January 2016 © COPYRIGHT by Jan Katherine Boyer 2016 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my advisor, Dr. Christopher Guy, for challenging me and providing advice throughout every stage of this project. I also thank my committee members, Dr. Molly Webb and Dr. Tom McMahon, for guidance and suggestions which greatly improved this research. My field technicians Jordan Rowe, Greg Hill, and Patrick Luckenbill worked hard through fair weather and snowstorms to help me collect the data presented here. I also thank Travis Horton, Pat Clancey, Travis Lohrenz, Tim Weiss, Kevin Hughes, Rick Smaniatto, and Nick Pederson of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks for field assistance and advice. Mariah Talbott, Leif Halvorson, and Eli Cureton of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service assisted with field and lab work. Richard Lessner and Dave Brickner at the Madison River Foundation helped to secure funding for this project and conduct outreach in the Madison Valley. The Channels Ranch, Valley Garden Ranch, Sun West Ranch, and Galloup’s Slide Inn provided crucial land and river access. I also thank my fellow graduate students both for advice on project and class work and for being excellent people to spend time with. Ann Marie Reinhold, Mariah Mayfield, David Ritter, and Peter Brown were especially helpful during the early stages of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Archiv Für Naturgeschichte
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Archiv für Naturgeschichte Jahr/Year: 1864 Band/Volume: 30-1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Malmgren Anders Johan Artikel/Article: Kritische Übersicht der Fisch-Fauna Finlands. 259-351 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at landeskulturdirektion Oberösterreich; download www.ooegeschichte.at Kritische Uebersicht der Fisch-Fauna Finlaiids. Von Dr. Anders Johan fflalnigren. Aus dem Schwedischen von Dr. C. F. Frisch. Die ersten Nachrichten über die Fischfauna Finlands hat P.A. Gadd geliefert in seinem ,.Förfök tili Ichthyo- o logia Fennica", aufgenommen in Abo Tidningar 1771, S. 153 und 163, so wie 1772. S. 364 u. 372. Sein Verzeich- niss, welches offenbar mit Leitung der Arbeiten Linne's entworfen ist und sich nur in sehr wenigen Fällen auf eigene Erfahrung oder Autopsie gründet, nimmt leider all- zuviele Arten auf, welche niemals an unsern Ostseeküsten gefunden sind und dort niemals gefunden werden können, als dass man diesem „Versuche" das Verdienst zuschrei- ben könnte, zur Verbreitung der Kenntniss über die ichthyologischen Verhältnisse unseres Landes wesentlich beigetragen zu haben. Von grösserem Werthe ist Dr. 1 Radloff's Verzeichniss der Fische Alands ), welches, wenn auch keineswegs vollständig, vor Gadd's Arbeit den Vorzug besitzt, dass die Bestimmungen und die sy- stematischen Benennungen richtig sind bis auf drei Aus- nahmen. Mit Leitung dieser Vorarbeiten von Gadd und Ra dlo ff arbeitete S adelin in Fauna Fennica II, 1819 ein allgemeines Verzeichniss über die Fischarten aus, welche nach seiner Ansicht der Fauna Finlands angehör- ten. Alle von Gadd und Radioff angeführten Arten nahm er ohne die geringste Bedenklichkeit auf, und die Anzahl solcher, die unmöglich unserer Fauna ange- 1) Beskrifning öfver Aland 1795.
    [Show full text]
  • Coregonus Lavaretus Complex 1.4 Alternative Species Scientific Name 1.5 Common Name (In National Language) Whitefish 2
    European Community Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (92/43/EEC) Fourth Report by the United Kingdom under Article 17 on the implementation of the Directive from January 2013 to December 2018 Supporting documentation for the conservation status assessment for the species: S6353 ‐ WhitefishCoregonus ( lavaretus) SCOTLAND IMPORTANT NOTE ‐ PLEASE READ • The information in this document is a country‐level contribution to the UK Reporton the conservation status of this species, submitted to the European Commission aspart of the 2019 UK Reporting under Article 17 of the EU Habitats Directive. • The 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document provides details on how this supporting information was used to produce the UK Report. • The UK Report on the conservation status of this species is provided in a separate doc‐ ument. • The reporting fields and options used are aligned to those set out in the European Com‐ mission guidance. • Explanatory notes (where provided) by the country are included at the end. These pro‐ vide an audit trail of relevant supporting information. • Some of the reporting fields have been left blank because either: (i) there was insuffi‐ cient information to complete the field; (ii) completion of the field was not obligatory; (iii) the field was not relevant to this species (section 12 Natura 2000 coverage forAnnex II species) and/or (iv) the field was only relevant at UK‐level (sections 9 Future prospects and 10 Conclusions). • For technical reasons, the country‐level future trends for Range, Population and Habitat for the species are only available in a separate spreadsheet that contains all the country‐ level supporting information.
    [Show full text]
  • Labidesthes Sicculus
    Version 2, 2015 United States Fish and Wildlife Service Lower Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office 1 Atherinidae Atherinidae Sand Smelt Distinguishing Features: — (Atherina boyeri) — Sand Smelt (Non-native) Old World Silversides Old World Silversides Old World (Atherina boyeri) Two widely separated dorsal fins Eye wider than Silver color snout length 39-49 lateral line scales 2 anal spines, 13-15.5 rays Rainbow Smelt (Non -Native) (Osmerus mordax) No dorsal spines Pale green dorsally Single dorsal with adipose fin Coloring: Silver Elongated, pointed snout No anal spines Size: Length: up to 145mm SL Pink/purple/blue iridescence on sides Distinguishing Features: Dorsal spines (total): 7-10 Brook Silverside (Native) 1 spine, 10-11 rays Dorsal soft rays (total): 8-16 (Labidesthes sicculus) 4 spines Anal spines: 2 Anal soft rays: 13-15.5 Eye diameter wider than snout length Habitat: Pelagic in lakes, slow or still waters Similar Species: Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax), 75-80 lateral line scales Brook Silverside (Labidesthes sicculus) Elongated anal fin Images are not to scale 2 3 Centrarchidae Centrarchidae Redear Sunfish Distinguishing Features: (Lepomis microlophus) Redear Sunfish (Non-native) — — Sunfishes (Lepomis microlophus) Sunfishes Red on opercular flap No iridescent lines on cheek Long, pointed pectoral fins Bluegill (Native) Dark blotch at base (Lepomis macrochirus) of dorsal fin No red on opercular flap Coloring: Brownish-green to gray Blue-purple iridescence on cheek Bright red outer margin on opercular flap
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Fishing in Holocene Cis-Baikal, Siberia: a Review Robert J
    This article was downloaded by: [Robert Losey] On: 03 April 2012, At: 18:52 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uica20 Fish and Fishing in Holocene Cis-Baikal, Siberia: A Review Robert J. Losey a , Tatiana Nomokonova a & Dustin White b c a Department of Anthropology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada b Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK c Department of Archaeology, School of Humanities, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Available online: 29 Mar 2012 To cite this article: Robert J. Losey, Tatiana Nomokonova & Dustin White (2012): Fish and Fishing in Holocene Cis-Baikal, Siberia: A Review, The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 7:1, 126-145 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2011.611854 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe
    Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Lara Ibrahim, M.Sc. aus Mazeraat Assaf, Libanon Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Andreas Schäffer Prof. Dr. Christoph Schäfers Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30. Juli 2015 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek online verfügbar Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich diese Doktorarbeit selbständig und nur unter Verwendung der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Weiterhin versichere ich, die aus benutzten Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht zu haben. Lara Ibrahim Aachen, am 18 März 2015 Zusammenfassung Die Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft verlangt unter anderem eine Abschätzung des Risikos für Organismen in der Umwelt, die nicht Ziel der Anwendung sind. Unvertretbare Auswirkungen auf den Naturhalt sollen vermieden werden. Die ökologische Risikoanalyse stellt die dafür benötigten Informationen durch eine Abschätzung der Exposition der Organismen und der sich daraus ergebenden Effekte bereit. Die Effektabschätzung beruht dabei hauptsächlich auf standardisierten ökotoxikologischen Tests im Labor mit wenigen, oft nicht einheimischen Stellvertreterarten. In diesen Tests werden z. B. Effekte auf das Überleben, das Wachstum und/oder die Reproduktion von Fischen bei verschiedenen Konzentrationen der Testsubstanz gemessen und Endpunkte wie die LC50 (Lethal Concentrations for 50%) oder eine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration, z. B. für Wachstum oder Reproduktionsparameter) abgeleitet. Für Fische und Wirbeltiere im Allgemeinen beziehen sich die spezifischen Schutzziele auf das Überleben von Individuen und die Abundanz und Biomasse von Populationen.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report No
    Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2614 2002 Life History Characteristics Of Freshwater Fishes Occurring in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, With Major Emphasis on Riverine Habitat Requirements by C.L. Evans1, J.D. Reist1 and C.K. Minns2 1. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Arctic Fish Ecology and Assessment Research, Central and Arctic Division, 501 University Crescent, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N6 Canada 2. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Great Lakes Laboratory of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Bayfield Institute, 867 Lakeshore Road, P.O. Box 5050, Burlington, Ontario, L7R 4A6 Canada. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2002 Cat. No. Fs 97-4/2614E ISSN 0706-6473 Correct citation of this publication: Evans, C.E., J.D. Reist and C.K. Minns. 2002. Life history characteristics of freshwater fishes occurring in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut, with major emphasis on riverine habitat requirements. Can. MS Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2614: xiii + 169 p. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................ v ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................viii RÉSUMÉ ........................................................................................................................viii INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]