DOCSLIB.ORG

GIS Screening

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GIS Screening Screening Results for: IR EPR discharges to water Date Produced: 16/09/2020 Reference number: KP3236YH NGR of search: SP 86093 68828 Notes: Site centre distance (m): 80 https://easimap2. prodds. ntnl/Html5Viewer/I ndex.html? viewer=Permitting &Extent=484159. 913849983, 266371. 936523897, © Crown Copyright and database right 2020. Ordnance Survey licence number 100024198. Copyright © Natural England. © Crown Copyright. 492626. Launch597450017, EasiMap All rights reserved. Countryside Council for Wales, 100018813, 2020. © Environment Agency copyright and / or database rights 2020. 270889. All rights reserved. © Copyright English Heritage. © The National Assembly for Wales. Easimap Screening Results Click here to download Permit Screening distances Screening Results for: IR EPR discharges to water Date produced: 16/09/2020 Reference number: KP3236YH NGR of search: SP 86093 68828 Notes: Site centre distance (m): 80 Data Details Within Search Direction Action Special Protection Areas - England Site Name: Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits 9813m Downstream in the HRA Stage 1 Form (App11) consultation with NE may be required (SPA) nearest watercourse Ramsar Sites - England Site Name: Upper Nene Valley Gravel Pits 9813m Downstream in the HRA Stage 1 Form (App11) consultation with NE may be required (Ramsar) nearest watercourse Local Wildlife Sites Name: Park Farm Industrial Estate 424m Downstream in the Take account of the requirements of this site. If there is no data available nearest watercourse consult Area EPR Installation Team EPR Team: Installations South 0m Radial EPR Waste Team EPR Team: Waste South 0m Radial EPR Land and Water Team EPR Team: Land and Water South 0m Radial Counties County Name: Northamptonshire County 0m Radial Local Authorities Name: Wellingborough 0m Radial EA Water Management Areas Area name: Lincolnshire and 0m Radial Northamptonshire Local Nature Reserves - England None present 2000m Local Nature Reserves - Wales None present 2000m National Nature Reserves - England None present 2000m National Nature Reserves - Wales None present 2000m Protected Habitats - Wet Woodland None present 500m Protected Habitats - Coastal Saltmarsh None present 500m Protected Habitats - Intertidal mudflats None present 500m Protected Habitats - Aquifer fed water None present 500m bodies Protected Habitats - Chalk rivers None present 500m Protected Habitats - Saline lagoons None present 500m Protected Habitats - Fens None present 500m Protected Habitats - Coastal vegetated None present 500m shingle Protected Habitats - Mudflats None present 500m Protected Habitats - Coastal and None present 500m Floodplain Grazing Marsh Easimap Screening Results Click here to download Permit Screening distances Screening Results for: IR EPR discharges to water Date produced: 16/09/2020 Reference number: KP3236YH NGR of search: SP 86093 68828 Notes: Site centre distance (m): 80 Data Details Within Search Direction Action Protected Habitats - Reedbeds None present 500m Protected Species - Brown trout Salmo None present 500m trutta Protected Species - Sea trout Salmo trutta None present 500m migratory route Protected Species - Smelt Osmerus None present 2000m eperlanus Protected Species - Smelt Osmerus None present 2000m eperlanus migratory route Protected Species - European eel Anguilla None present 500m anguilla Protected Species - European eel Anguilla None present 500m anguilla migratory route Protected Species - Vendace Coregonus None present 2000m albula Protected Species - Whitefish (Powan, None present 2000m Gwyniad, Schelly) Coregonus lavaretus Protected Species - Bullhead Cottus None present 500m gobio Protected Species - Spined loach Cobitis None present 500m taenia Protected Species - Atlantic salmon None present 500m Salmo salar Protected Species - Atlantic salmon None present 500m Salmo salar migratory route Protected Species - Unidentified shad None present 2000m Alosa Protected Species - Twaite shad Alosa None present 2000m fallax Protected Species - Twaite shad Alosa None present 2000m fallax migratory route Protected Species - Allis shad Alosa alosa None present 2000m Protected Species - Allis shad Alosa alosa None present 2000m migratory route Protected Species - Unidentified shad None present 2000m Alosa migratory route Protected Species - River lamprey None present 500m Lampetra fluviatilis Protected species - Unidentified lamprey None present 500m Petromyzontidae Easimap Screening Results Click here to download Permit Screening distances Screening Results for: IR EPR discharges to water Date produced: 16/09/2020 Reference number: KP3236YH NGR of search: SP 86093 68828 Notes: Site centre distance (m): 80 Data Details Within Search Direction Action Protected Species - River lamprey None present 500m Lampetra fluviatilis migratory route Protected Species - Brook lamprey None present 500m Lampetra planeri Protected Species - Sea lamprey None present 500m Petromyzon marinus Protected Species - Sea lamprey None present 500m Petromyzon marinus migratory route Protected Species - Arctic charr None present 2000m Salvelinus alpinus Protected Species - A diving beetle None present 200m Agabus brunneus Protected Species - A river shingle beetle None present 200m Bembidion testaceum Protected Species - A river shingle beetle None present 200m Hydrochus nitidicollis Protected Species - A river shingle beetle None present 200m Meotica anglica Protected Species - A river shingle beetle None present 200m Thinobius newberyi Protected Species - Depressed river None present 200m mussel Pseudanodonta complanata Protected Species - Fine-lined pea mussel None present 200m Pisidium tenuilineatum Protected Species - Greater water parsnip None present 200m Sium latifolium Protected Species - Hairy click beetle None present 200m Synaptus filiformis Protected Species - Lagoon spire snail None present 200m Heleobia stagnorum Protected Species - Shining rams horn None present 200m snail Segmentina nitida Protected Species - Slender stonewort None present 200m Nitella gracilis Protected Species - Stary stonewort None present 200m Nitellopsis obtusa Protected Species - Southern silver None present 200m stiletto fly Cliorismia rustica Protected Species - Tassel stonewort None present 200m Tolypella intricata Protected Species - Fen raft spider None present 200m Dolomedes plantarius Easimap Screening Results Click here to download Permit Screening distances Screening Results for: IR EPR discharges to water Date produced: 16/09/2020 Reference number: KP3236YH NGR of search: SP 86093 68828 Notes: Site centre distance (m): 80 Data Details Within Search Direction Action Dolomedes plantarius Protected Species - Glutinous snail Myxas None present 200m glutinosa Protected Species - Medicinal Leech None present 200m Hirudo medicinalis Protected Species - Multi-Fruited None present 200m River-Moss Cryphaea lamyana Protected Species - Ribbon-Leaved Water None present 200m Plantain Alisma gramineum Protected Species - River Jelly Lichen None present 200m Collema dichotomum Protected Species - Triangular club-rush None present 200m Schoenoplectus triqueter Protected Species - Triangular club-rush None present 200m hybrid Schoenoplectus kuekenthalianus Protected Species - Water Germander None present 200m Teucrium scordium Protected Species - Water Vole Arvicola None present 200m amphibius Protected Species - Sand Lizard Lacerta None present 200m agilis Protected Species - Natterjack toad Bufo None present 200m calamita Protected Species - Code 4 None present 200m Protected Species - Creeping Marshwort None present 500m Protected Species - Code 2 None present 250m Protected Species - Marsh Fritillary None present 500m Butterfly Euphydryas Protected Species - White-Clawed None present 500m Crayfish Protected Species - Southern Damselfly None present 500m Protected Species - Desmoulins Whorl None present 500m Snail Protected Species - Narrow-mouthed None present 500m Whorl Snail Protected Species - Geyers Whorl Snail None present 500m Protected Species - Little Whirlpool Rams None present 500m Horn Snail Easimap Screening Results Click here to download Permit Screening distances Screening Results for: IR EPR discharges to water Date produced: 16/09/2020 Reference number: KP3236YH NGR of search: SP 86093 68828 Notes: Site centre distance (m): 80 Data Details Within Search Direction Action Protected Species - Floating-leaved Water None present 2000m Plantain Protected Species - Code 3 None present 2000m Protected Species - Yellow Marsh None present 500m Saxifrage Protected Species - Code 1 None present 500m Protected Species - Petalwort None present 500m Protected Species - Shore dock None present 2000m Protected Species - Slender Green None present 2000m Feather-Moss Ramsar Sites - Wales None present 10000m Special Areas of Conservation - England None present 10000m Special Areas of Conservation - Wales None present 10000m Source Protection Zone 1 None present 5m Source Protection Zone 2 None present 5m Source Protection Zone 3 None present 5m Special Protection Areas - Wales None present 10000m Sites of Special Scientific Interest - None present 2000m England Sites of Special Scientific Interest - Wales None present 2000m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe
    Identification and Modelling of a Representative Vulnerable Fish Species for Pesticide Risk Assessment in Europe Von der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der RWTH Aachen University zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Lara Ibrahim, M.Sc. aus Mazeraat Assaf, Libanon Berichter: Universitätsprofessor Dr. Andreas Schäffer Prof. Dr. Christoph Schäfers Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 30. Juli 2015 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Universitätsbibliothek online verfügbar Erklärung Ich versichere, dass ich diese Doktorarbeit selbständig und nur unter Verwendung der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Weiterhin versichere ich, die aus benutzten Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht zu haben. Lara Ibrahim Aachen, am 18 März 2015 Zusammenfassung Die Zulassung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft verlangt unter anderem eine Abschätzung des Risikos für Organismen in der Umwelt, die nicht Ziel der Anwendung sind. Unvertretbare Auswirkungen auf den Naturhalt sollen vermieden werden. Die ökologische Risikoanalyse stellt die dafür benötigten Informationen durch eine Abschätzung der Exposition der Organismen und der sich daraus ergebenden Effekte bereit. Die Effektabschätzung beruht dabei hauptsächlich auf standardisierten ökotoxikologischen Tests im Labor mit wenigen, oft nicht einheimischen Stellvertreterarten. In diesen Tests werden z. B. Effekte auf das Überleben, das Wachstum und/oder die Reproduktion von Fischen bei verschiedenen Konzentrationen der Testsubstanz gemessen und Endpunkte wie die LC50 (Lethal Concentrations for 50%) oder eine NOEC (No Observed Effect Concentration, z. B. für Wachstum oder Reproduktionsparameter) abgeleitet. Für Fische und Wirbeltiere im Allgemeinen beziehen sich die spezifischen Schutzziele auf das Überleben von Individuen und die Abundanz und Biomasse von Populationen.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoloyy Coregonus Lavaretus
    0 Institi m Fresh tt)9 4- 0 Ecoloy y Ecology of the Schelly, Coregonus lavaretus, in Haweswater I J Winfield, J M Fletcher & P R Cubby April 1994 Natural Environment Research Council á ECOLOGY OF THE SCHELLY, COREGONUS LAVARETUS, IN HAWESWATER I J Winfield; J M Fletcher & P R Cubby Project Leader: Winfield Contract Start Date 1 April1991 Report Date: 30 May 1994 Report To: North WestWaterLimited TFS ProjectNo: T-1-1-G5Ast-r iio SO%- [FE Report RefNo 311114454€416%-s tit fo s Or1/6 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT 'In accordancewith our normal practice, this report is for the use only of the party to whom it is addressed, and no responsibility is accepted to any third party for the whole or any part of its contents. Neitherthe whole nor any part of this report or any reference thereto may be included in anypublisheddocument, circularor statement,nor published or referred to in any way without our written approval of the form and context in which it may appear'. CONTENTS Page Summary Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background to the present investigation 1.2 General ecology of schelly 1.3 Haweswater as a schellyhabitat 1.4 Objectives of the present investigation Chapter 2 Population biology and distribution of schelly 2.1 Introduction /./ Methods 2.3 Results 2.4 Discussion Chapter 3 Spawning grounds of schelly 21 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Methods 3.3 Results 3.4 Discussion Chapter 4 Lone-term records of lake levels and abstraction volumes 25 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Methods 4.3 Results 4.4 Discussion Chapter 5 Lone-term records of entrapment of schellyand other fish species 32 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Methods 5.3 Results 5.4 Discussion Chapter 6 Biology of entrapped schelly and charr 39 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Methods 6.3 Results 6.4 Discussion Chapter 7 General discussion 45 Acknowledgements 49 References 50 á SUMMARY The ecology of the rare schelly (Coregonus lavaretus) in Haweswater was investigated over the period from April 1990 to March 1994, with particular reference to the impact of the water abstraction system.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Wales Guidance (Pdf)
    Wildlife Sites Guidance Wales A Guide to Develop Local Wildlife Systems in Wales Wildlife Sites Guidance Wales A Guide to Develop Local Wildlife Systems in Wales Foreword The Welsh Assembly Government’s Environment Strategy for Wales, published in May 2006, pays tribute to the intrinsic value of biodiversity – ‘the variety of life on earth’. The Strategy acknowledges the role biodiversity plays, not only in many natural processes, but also in the direct and indirect economic, social, aesthetic, cultural and spiritual benefits that we derive from it. The Strategy also acknowledges that pressures brought about by our own actions and by other factors, such as climate change, have resulted in damage to the biodiversity of Wales and calls for a halt to this loss and for the implementation of measures to bring about a recovery. Local Wildlife Sites provide essential support between and around our internationally and nationally designated nature sites and thus aid our efforts to build a more resilient network for nature in Wales. The Wildlife Sites Guidance derives from the shared knowledge and experience of people and organisations throughout Wales and beyond and provides a common point of reference for the most effective selection of Local Wildlife Sites. I am grateful to the Wales Biodiversity Partnership for developing the Wildlife Sites Guidance. The contribution and co-operation of organisations and individuals across Wales are vital to achieving our biodiversity targets. I hope that you will find the Wildlife Sites Guidance a useful tool in the battle against biodiversity loss and that you will ensure that it is used to its full potential in order to derive maximum benefit for the vitally important and valuable nature in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • En Report (Scie) F&B
    Report Number 554 Survey of vendace in Daer Reservoir and Loch Skene English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 554 Survey of vendace in Daer Reservoir and Loch Skene Peter S. M aitland1, Alex A. Lyle2 and Ian J. Winfield3 1Fish Conservation Centre, Gladshot, Haddington, East Lothian EH41 4NR 218 John Knox Road, Longniddry, East Lothian EH32 0LP 3CEH Windermere, The Ferry House, Far Sawrey, Ambleside, Cumbria LA22 0LP September 2003 You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2003 ‘The inhabitants of Lochmaben look upon the vendace as a mysterious fish peculiar to their lakes, a fish in which they take a pride, and one concerning which there are many curious traditions.’ Tate Regan (1911) Acknowledgements This study was funded by English Nature. We are grateful to David Fraser (English Nature), Colin Bean (Scottish Natural Heritage) and Cameron Durie (Environment Agency) for their advice and comments. Alexander Hampton (National Trust for Scotland) provided invaluable liaison with anglers and collected catch data from them. Ian Stephenson and his quad bike helped with transport to and from Loch Skene. Scottish Water and the National Trust for Scotland gave permission for this study at Daer Reservoir and Loch Skene respectively. Staff of Scottish Water and members of the Kylbryde Angling Club gave helpful advice at Daer Reservoir. Summary The vendace Coregonus albula (L.) occurred historically at four sites in Great Britain, two in Scotland and two in England.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for the Establishment of Self-Sustaining Atlantic Whitefish Population(S) and Development of a Framework for the Evaluation of Suitable Lake Habitat
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Maritimes Region Science Advisory Report 2018/045 STRATEGIES FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SELF- SUSTAINING ATLANTIC WHITEFISH POPULATION(S) AND DEVELOPMENT OF A FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVALUATION OF SUITABLE LAKE HABITAT Atlantic Whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani) (Source: DFO 2009) Figure 1. Global distribution of Atlantic Whitefish. Context: The Atlantic Whitefish (Coregonus huntsmani) is an endangered species that is at high risk for global extinction. The species global distribution has been restricted, for at least the past three decades, to three small interconnected lakes in the upper Petite Rivière watershed in southwest Nova Scotia. The continued survival of Atlantic Whitefish is now further threatened by illegally introduced invasive piscivorous fish species (Smallmouth Bass (pre-2003) and Chain Pickerel (2013)) within this remaining habitat. Range expansion, the establishment of additional self-sustaining populations outside the currently occupied habitat in the Petite Rivière watershed, is identified as the distribution objective of the Atlantic Whitefish Recovery Strategy and could also prevent extinction. In spring 2017, three options in support of survival and recovery of Atlantic Whitefish were considered by Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO). Options included: simple translocation, translocation with temporary holding, and the establishment of a new propagation program at a DFO Biodiversity Facility with the option of translocation with temporary holding approved. This option would see Atlantic Whitefish, captured from the Petite Rivière Lakes, transported to a DFO Biodiversity Facility for short-term holding, before being released into new non- natal habitat. However, insufficient numbers of Atlantic Whitefish are available from the wild to provide a reasonable likelihood of success of this option at present.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cyprinid Fish
    DFO - Library / MPO - Bibliotheque 01005886 c.i FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. Circular No. 65 RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Biological Station, Nanaimo, B0C. Circular No. 65 9^ RUSSIAN-ENGLISH GLOSSARY OF NAMES OF AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL AND RELATED TERMS ^5, Compiled by W. E. Ricker Fisheries Research Board of Canada Nanaimo, B.C. August, 1962 FOREWORD This short Russian-English glossary is meant to be of assistance in translating scientific articles in the fields of aquatic biology and the study of fishes and fisheries. j^ Definitions have been obtained from a variety of sources. For the names of fishes, the text volume of "Commercial Fishes of the USSR" provided English equivalents of many Russian names. Others were found in Berg's "Freshwater Fishes", and in works by Nikolsky (1954), Galkin (1958), Borisov and Ovsiannikov (1958), Martinsen (1959), and others. The kinds of fishes most emphasized are the larger species, especially those which are of importance as food fishes in the USSR, hence likely to be encountered in routine translating. However, names of a number of important commercial species in other parts of the world have been taken from Martinsen's list. For species for which no recognized English name was discovered, I have usually given either a transliteration or a translation of the Russian name; these are put in quotation marks to distinguish them from recognized English names.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology and Taxonomy of Diplostomum Species (Trematoda: Diplostomatidae) Infecting Fish of Llyn Tegid, North Wales and the Ruvu Basin, Tanzania
    Tittle Epidemiology and Taxonomy of Diplostomum Species (Trematoda: Diplostomatidae) Infecting Fish of Llyn Tegid, North Wales and the Ruvu Basin, Tanzania. Author Nkwengulila, Gamba Abstract This study investigated the epidemiology and taxonomy of Diplostomuni species in the deeper parts of the eye (DPE) of roach Rutilus rutilus (L. ), perch Perca fluviatilis L., ruffe Gymnocephalus cernua (L. ) and gwyniad Coregonus lavaretus (L. ) at Llyn Tegid, North Wales, and in the cranium of catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) and the vitreous humour of Oreochromis species at Mindu dam and river Ruvu, Tanzania. At Llyn Tegid, two species of Diplostomum metacercariae, large and small forms, coexisted in DPE of perch, ruffe and gwyniad but only one, large forms, occurred in roach. Large forms were distinguished by their large size, oval body tapering at both ends and pseudosuckers at the level of the oral sucker. Small forms were distinguished by their smaller size, oval body with parallel sides and pseudosuckers occurring below the level of the oral sucker. The taxonomy of the two forms was not resolved even after obtaining adults from chickens. Tentatively, small forms keyed close to D. gasterostei Williams, 1966 and large forms to D. volvens Nordmann, 1832. Inadequate identification manuals and remarkable similarity between Diplostonlum species confounded identification. Mean intensity of metacercariae was highest in ruffe and lowest in perch and increased with host size in all hosts. Factors responsible for differences in mean intensity between hosts were discussed. There was no seasonality of occurrence. Recruitment occurred from May - November correlating with water temperatures. Immature metacercariae occurred throughout the period of investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Conservation Biology of Coregonus Lavaretus in Britain. Phd Thesis
    Etheridge, E. C. (2009) Aspects of the conservation biology of Coregonus lavaretus in Britain. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1598/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Aspects of the conservation biology of Coregonus lavaretus in Britain Elizabeth C. Etheridge Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2009 2 ABSTRACT Conservation of phenotypically variable taxa such as the European whitefish ( Coregonus lavaretus ) can be particularly challenging. In this thesis it is argued that the recent designation of seven native C. lavaretus populations as three endemic species ( C. clupeoides , C. stigmaticus and C. pennantii ) by Kottelat & Freyhof (2007) are incorrect and cannot be substantiated with the results presented here. However, evidence for important infra-specific variation between populations has been found. Two native Scottish populations of C. lavaretus show considerable variation in morphology, trophic ecology and life history.
    [Show full text]
  • Coregonus Lavaretus Complex 1.4 Alternative Species Scientific Name 1.5 Common Name (In National Language) Whitefish 2
    European Community Directive on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (92/43/EEC) Fourth Report by the United Kingdom under Article 17 on the implementation of the Directive from January 2013 to December 2018 Supporting documentation for the conservation status assessment for the species: S6353 ‐ WhitefishCoregonus ( lavaretus) WALES IMPORTANT NOTE ‐ PLEASE READ • The information in this document is a country‐level contribution to the UK Reporton the conservation status of this species, submitted to the European Commission aspart of the 2019 UK Reporting under Article 17 of the EU Habitats Directive. • The 2019 Article 17 UK Approach document provides details on how this supporting information was used to produce the UK Report. • The UK Report on the conservation status of this species is provided in a separate doc‐ ument. • The reporting fields and options used are aligned to those set out in the European Com‐ mission guidance. • Explanatory notes (where provided) by the country are included at the end. These pro‐ vide an audit trail of relevant supporting information. • Some of the reporting fields have been left blank because either: (i) there was insuffi‐ cient information to complete the field; (ii) completion of the field was not obligatory; (iii) the field was not relevant to this species (section 12 Natura 2000 coverage forAnnex II species) and/or (iv) the field was only relevant at UK‐level (sections 9 Future prospects and 10 Conclusions). • For technical reasons, the country‐level future trends for Range, Population and Habitat for the species are only available in a separate spreadsheet that contains all the country‐ level supporting information.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLES Alphabl?TIQUES Downloaded From
    TABLES ALPHABl?TIQUES Downloaded from I. Noms latins http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/ Abramis ballerus 308 Arnoglossus Groh- Cantharus lineatus 6 1 - blicca 309 manni 268 1 Capros aper 85 - brama 307 - laterna 267 Caranx trachurus 81 - vimba 310 Artediellus uncinatus 126 Carassius vulgaris 295 Acanthias vulgaris 19 Aspidophoroides Olriki 139 Carcharias glaucus 6 Acantholabrus Palloni 197 Aspius alburnus 31 2 Careproctus gelati- Acanthorinus carcha- - rapax 31 1 nosus 145 rias 25 Atherina Boyeri 179 - mieropus 146 Acerina cernua 53 - presbyter, 178 - Reinhardti 145 Auxis Rochei 104 Centridermichthys hama- Acipenser stenorrhyn- at Stockholms Universitet on September 1, 2015 chus 50 - thazard 104 tus 127 - sturio 49 - uncinatus 126 . 1 . ron - uetiaguiiua LOO I- Alburnus bipunctatus 3 13 Barbus vulgaris 296 Centrolabrus exoletus 198 - lucidus 3 12 Batrachus didactylus 108 Centrolophus britan- Alepisaurus ferox 289 Belone vulgaris 319 nicus 87 Alepocephalus Agas- Beryx decadactylus 74 - pompilus 88 sizi 358 Blenniops Ascanii 175 1 Centronotus gunellus 176 Alopecias vulpes 11 Blennius galerita 166, 175 Centrophorus calceus 21 Alopias vulpes 11 - gattorugine 165 - squainosus 20 Ammodvtes cicerelus 246 - Montagui 166 Centroscyllium Fabricii 24 - lanceolatus 244 - ocellaris 167 Cephaloptera giornae 47 - tobianus 245 1 - pholis 168 Cepola rubescens 161 Amphioxus lanceolatus 1 1 Bothus laevis 261 Ceratias Holbolli 3 10 Anarrhichas latifrons 164 - maximus 260 Cetorhinus maximus 12 - lupus 162 __ rhombus 261 Chalinura simula 253 - minor 163 Box
    [Show full text]
  • GENUS Brachymystax Gunther, 1866
    FAMILY Salmonidae Jarocki (or Schinz), 1822 - salmonids SUBFAMILY Salmoninae Jarocki (or Schinz), 1822 - salmonids [=Dermopteres, Salmonidi, Salmones, Tutriformes (Truttiformes), Salvelini, Brachymystini, Oncorhynchus, Huchoninae, Salmothymini, Salvelinini, Parahuchoninae] GENUS Brachymystax Gunther, 1866 - lenoks, Asiatic trout, Manchurian trout Species Brachymystax lenok (Pallas, 1773) - sharp-snouted lenok [=coregonoides, swetowidowi] Species Brachymystax savinovi Mitrofanov, 1959 - Russian lenok Species Brachymystax tsinlingensis Li, 1966 - Yangtze lenok Species Brachymystax tumensis Mori, 1930 - blunt-snouted lenok [=czerskii] GENUS Hucho Gunther, 1866 - salmonids [=Epitomynis] Species Hucho bleekeri Kimura, 1934 - Bleeker's hucho Species Hucho hucho (Linnaeus, 1758) - huchen, huchen trout, Danube salmon [=germanorum] Species Hucho ishikawae Mori, 1928 - Korean hucho Species Hucho taimen (Pallas, 1773) - taimen [=fluviatilis, lossos] GENUS Oncorhynchus Suckley, 1861 - salmonids [=Hypsifario, Paraoncorhynchus, Parasalmo] Species Oncorhynchus aguabonita (Jordan, 1892) - golden trout, California golden trout [=roosevelti, whitei] Species Oncorhynchus apache (Miller, 1972) - apache trout, Arizona trout Species Oncorhynchus chrysogaster (Needham & Gard, 1964) - Mexican golden trout Species Oncorhynchus clarkii (Richardson, 1837) - cutthroat trout [=alpestris, alvordensis, bathoecetor, behnkei, bouvieri, brevicauda, carinatus, carmichaeli, crescentis, declivifrons, eremogenes, evermanni, henshawi, humboldtensis, jordani, lewisi, macdonaldi,
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Char Or Arctic Charr (Salvelinus
    SALVELINUS ALPINUS Arctic char or Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus ) is both a freshwater and saltwater fish in the Salmonidae family, native to Arctic, sub-Arctic and alpine lakes and coastal waters. No other freshwater fish is found as far north. It is one of the rarest fish species in Britain, found only in deep, cold, glacial lakes, mostly in Scotland, and is at risk from acidification. In other parts of its range, it is much more common, and is fished extensively. In Siberia, it is known as golets (from the Russian голец). Arctic char are closely related to both salmon and trout and has many characteristics of both. Individual char fish can weigh 20 lb (9 kilograms) or more with record sized fish having been taken by angling in Northern Canada. Generally, whole market sized fish are between 2 and 5 lb in weight (900 g and 2.3 kilograms). The flesh colour of char varies; it can range from a bright red to a pale pink. Arctic char farming Research aimed at determining the suitability of Arctic char as a cultured species has been ongoing since the late 1970s. The Canadian government's Freshwater Institute of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans at Winnipeg, Manitoba, and the Huntsman Marine Science Laboratory of New Brunswick, pioneered the early efforts in Canada. Arctic char is also farmed in Norway. Arctic char were first investigated because it was expected that they would have low optimum temperature requirements and would grow well at the cold water temperatures present in numerous areas of Canada.
    [Show full text]