DOCSLIB.ORG

Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Wales Guidance (Pdf)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wildlife Sites Guidance Wales A Guide to Develop Local Wildlife Systems in Wales Wildlife Sites Guidance Wales A Guide to Develop Local Wildlife Systems in Wales Foreword The Welsh Assembly Government’s Environment Strategy for Wales, published in May 2006, pays tribute to the intrinsic value of biodiversity – ‘the variety of life on earth’. The Strategy acknowledges the role biodiversity plays, not only in many natural processes, but also in the direct and indirect economic, social, aesthetic, cultural and spiritual benefits that we derive from it. The Strategy also acknowledges that pressures brought about by our own actions and by other factors, such as climate change, have resulted in damage to the biodiversity of Wales and calls for a halt to this loss and for the implementation of measures to bring about a recovery. Local Wildlife Sites provide essential support between and around our internationally and nationally designated nature sites and thus aid our efforts to build a more resilient network for nature in Wales. The Wildlife Sites Guidance derives from the shared knowledge and experience of people and organisations throughout Wales and beyond and provides a common point of reference for the most effective selection of Local Wildlife Sites. I am grateful to the Wales Biodiversity Partnership for developing the Wildlife Sites Guidance. The contribution and co-operation of organisations and individuals across Wales are vital to achieving our biodiversity targets. I hope that you will find the Wildlife Sites Guidance a useful tool in the battle against biodiversity loss and that you will ensure that it is used to its full potential in order to derive maximum benefit for the vitally important and valuable nature in Wales. GUIDELINES FOR THE SELECTION OF LOCAL SITES IN WALES Copies of this document can be obtained from: http://www.biodiversitywales.org.uk/ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many organisations and individuals have contributed to the development of these guidelines, some significantly so, being especially generous in sharing their time, expertise and experience. The input provided by the following is gratefully acknowledged; Nigel Ajax-Lewis (The Wildlife Trust for South & West Wales), Martin Anthoney (Gwent Moth Recorder), Colin Barr (ITE), Gill Barter (CCW), Jamie Bevan (CCW), Gemma Bodé (Gwent Wildlife Trust), Sam Bosanquet (Gwent Bryophyte Recorder), Julian Branscombe (Gwent Wildlife Trust), Clare Burrows (CCW), Rosie Carmichael (Carmarthenshire County Council), Colin Cheesman (Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council), Richard Clarke (Gwent Ornithological Society), Rebecca Davies (SEWBreC), Hazel Drewett (CCW), Gareth Ellis (Brecon Beacons National Park) Trevor Evans (BSBI Botanical Recorder, Monmouthshire), Shelley Evans (BMS), Mike Fowler (Newport City Council), Vaughan Grantham (Cardiff Council Ecologist), Russel Hobson (Butterfly Conservation), Georgina Holdsworth (Monmouthshire County Council), Rachel Hackett (Wildlife Trusts Partnership), Rob Hathaway , Sarah Hawkswell , Nicola Hawkeswood , Deb Hill (Swansea County Borough Council), Dr Charles Hipkin (University of Wales, Swansea), Dr Liz Howe (CCW), Margaret Humphreys (Vale of Glamorgan Council), Alison Jones (Caerphilly County Ecologist), Greg Jones (Swansea County Borough Council), Julian Jones (Radnorshire Wildlife Trust), Richard Jones (CCW), Jerry Lewis (Monmouthshire County Council), Steve Lucas (BCT), Sean McHugh (Wales Biodiversity Partnership), Clare Mockridge (CCW), Steve Moon (Bridgend County Borough Ecologist), Linda Moore, Ian Morgan , Rob Nottage (BTO), Tony Prater , Kate Pryor, Ian Rabjohns (Gwent Bat Recorder), Dr Tim Rich (National Museum & Gallery of Wales), Kate Rodgers (CCW), Kris Roberts (Torfaen County Borough Council), Andrea Rowe , Barry Stewart (Pryce Consultants), Louise Thornhill (CCW), Stephanie Tyler (local naturalist), Suzanne Waldron (EA), Steve Williams (Torfaen County Borough Council), Jon Winder (Woodland Trust), Richard Wistow (Rhondda Cynon Taff County Ecologist), Elsa and Adrian Wood (local naturalists/ ecological consultants), Julian Woodman (CCW/BSBI) Yvonne Wright (Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council), and Chris Wynne (North Wales Wildlife Trust). Our apologies go to any individuals who have been inadvertently omitted. The Wildlife Sites Project was supported financially by a grant from the Esmée Fairbairn Charitable Trust, CCW and in various ways by many of the Local Authorities across Wales. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 February 2008 Guidelines for the Selection of Local Sites in Wales CONTENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1.0 Preface 2.0 Background 3.0 Policy Framework 4.0 The Guidelines 5.0 Principles behind the Guidelines 6.0 Local Sites in a Planning Context 7.0 Application of the Guidelines 8.0 Site Selection Process PART 2: GUIDELINES FOR SITE SELECTION The detailed guidelines in this section are set out in three groups comprising: GEOLOOGICAL HABITATS SPECIES GEOLOGICAL GUIDELINES HABITAT GUIDELINES Terrestrial and Freshwater Habitats H1: Broadleaved, Mixed, and Yew Woodland H1:1 Traditional Orchards H1:2 Wood Pasture & Parkland H1:3 Native Woodland o Upland Oak Woodland o Lowland Beech & Yew Woodland o Upland Mixed Ash Woodland o Wet Woodland o Lowland Mixed Deciduous Woodland H1:4 Scrub Communities H2: Boundaries and Linear Features H2:1 Hedgerows H2:2 Cloddiau H3: Arable and Horticulture H3:1 Arable Field Margins H4 Improved Grasslands H4:1 Coastal and Floodplain Grazing Marsh H5: Neutral Grasslands H5:1 Lowland Meadows H6: Calcareous Grasslands H6:1 Lowland Calcareous Grasslands H6:2 Upland Calcareous Grasslands 3 Guidelines for the Selection of Local Sites in Wales H7 Acid Grasslands H7:1 Lowland Dry Acid Grasslands H7:2 Upland Acid Grasslands H8: Dwarf Shrub Heath H8:1 Lowland Heathland H8:2 Upland Heathland H9: Fen, Marsh and Swamp H9:1 Upland Fens, Marshes and Swamps H9:2 Lowland Fen H9:3 Purple Moorgrass and Rush Pasture H9:4 Reedbeds H10: Bogs H10:1 Lowland Raised Bog H10:2 Blanket Bog H11: Montane Habitats H11:1 Montane Heath and Willow Scrub H12: Rivers and Stream H12:1 Rivers H13: Standing Open Waters and Canals H13:1 Oligotrophic and Dystrophic Lakes H13:2 Ponds H13:3 Mesotrophic Lakes H13:4 Eutrophic Standing Waters H13:5 Aquifer Fed Naturally Fluctuating Water Bodies H14: Inland Rock H14:1 Inland Rock Outcrop and Scree Habitats H14:2 Calaminarian Grasslands H14:3 Open Mosaic Habitats on Previous Developed Land H14:4 Limestone Pavements H15: Coastal Habitats Supralittoral Rock H15:1 Maritime Cliffs and Slopes Supralittoral Sediment H15:2 Coastal Sand-Dunes H15:3 Coastal Vegetated Shingle H16: Mosaic Habitats H16:1 Fridd/Coedcae H16:2 Other Bracken Communities Marine Habitats H17: Littoral Rock H17:1 Intertidal Tidal Communities H17:2 Sabellaria Alveolata Reefs H17:3 Estuarine rocky habitats H18: Littoral Sediment H18:1 Coastal Saltmarsh H18:2 Intertidal Mudflats H18:3 Sea Grass Beds H18:4 Sheltered Muddy Gravels 4 Guidelines for the Selection of Local Sites in Wales H18:5 Peat and Clay Exposures H19: Sublittoral Rock H19:1 Tide-Swept Channels H19:2 Fragile sponge & anthozoan communities on subtidal rocky habitats H19:3 Carbonate Reef H20: Sublittoral Sediments H20:1 Subtidal Sands and Gravels H20:2 Sublittoral mixed muddy sediments H20:3 Mud habitats in deep water H20:4 Musculus discors beds, green crenella beds H20:5 Blue Mussel beds H20:6 Horse Mussel beds H20:7 Maerl beds H20:8 Saline Lagoons SPECIES GUIDELINES S1: Mammals S2: Birds S3: Herptiles (Reptiles and Amphibians) S4: Fish S5: Invertebrates S6: Vascular Plants S7: Lichens S8: Bryophytes (Mosses Liverworts and Hornworts) S9: Fungi S10: Charophytes Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations Bibliography Index Appendix 1 Examples of Vascular Plant and Bryophyte Indicator Lists Appendix 2 Wales and UK Habitat Targets disaggregated by Habitat Type Appendix 3 Wales and UK Habitat Targets disaggregated by LBAP Partnership 5 Guidelines for the Selection of Local Sites in Wales PART 1 INTRODUCTION 6 Guidelines for the Selection of Local Sites in Wales 1.0 PREFACE These guidelines have been developed in response to Action Point 38 of the first action plan of the Environment Strategy for Wales through discussion and consultation with a wide audience that has included experienced ecologists, LBAP officers, county recorders and local naturalists over a period of years. Terminology Many titles are used for biological Local Sites, including, Biological Heritage Site, Site of Nature Conservation Interest (SNCI), Sites of Interest for Nature Conservation (SINC), Site of Biological Interest and Site of Community Interest, whilst the term ‘Wildlife Site’ is the title preferred by the UK Wildlife Trusts Partnership. In Wales, Site of Interest for Nature Conservation (SINC) is the recognised term used in WAG planning guidance and local planning policies for biological Local Sites. It is suggested that SINC continues to be used in that context, a SINC may be considered a Wildlife Site when owner’s agreement, management advice and/or assistance, and potentially funding have been provided. Local geological sites are called RIGS, Regionally Important Geological Sites, recognized by WAG planning guidance and local planning policies. 2.0 BACKGROUND The origins of biological Local Sites systems stretch back to the 1970s where Wildlife Trusts in UK wished to protect and encourage the management the whole biodiversity resource within a given local government area. The idea behind Local Site systems based upon local planning authority [LPA] and now Local Biodiversity Action Plan Partnership
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Studies in the Genus Amanita

    Molecular Phylogenetic Studies in the Genus Amanita

    1170 Molecular phylogenetic studies in the genus Amanita I5ichael Weiß, Zhu-Liang Yang, and Franz Oberwinkler Abstracl A group of 49 Amanita species that had been thoroughly examined morphologically and amtomically was analyzed by DNA sequence compadson to estimate natural groups and phylogenetic rclationships within the genus. Nuclear DNA sequences coding for a part of the ribosomal large subunit were determined and evaluated using neighbor-joining with bootstrap analysis, parsimony analysis, conditional clustering, and maximum likelihood methods, Sections Amanita, Caesarea, Vaginatae, Validae, Phalloideae, and Amidella were substantially confirmed as monophyletic groups, while the monophyly of section Lepidell.t remained unclear. Branching topologies between and within sections could also pafiially be derived. Stbgenera Amanita an'd Lepidella were not supported. The Mappae group was included in section Validae. Grouping hypotheses obtained by DNA analyses are discussed in relation to the distribution of morphological and anatomical chamcters in the studied species. Key words: fungi, basidiomycetes phylogeny, Agarrcales, Amanita systematics, large subunit rDNA, 28S. R6sum6 : A partir d'un groupe de 49 esp,ces d'Amanita prdalablement examinees morphologiquement et anatomiquement, les auteurs ont utilisd la comparaison des s€quences d'ADN pour ddfinir les groupes naturels et les relations phylog6ndtiques de ce genre. Les sdquences de I'ADN nucl6aire codant pour une partie de la grande sous-unit6 ribosomale ont 6t6 ddterminEes et €valu6es en utilisant l'analyse par liaison en lacet avec le voisin (neighbor-joining with bootstrap), l'analyse en parcimonie, le rcgroupement conditionnel et les m€thodes de ressemblance maximale. Les rdsultats confirment substantiellement les sections Afiarira, Caesarea, Uaqinatae, Ualidae, Phalloideae et Amidella, comme groupes monophyldtiques, alors que la monophylie de la section Lepidella demerxe obscure.
  • Managing for Species: Integrating the Needs of England’S Priority Species Into Habitat Management

    Managing for Species: Integrating the Needs of England’S Priority Species Into Habitat Management

    Natural England Research Report NERR024 Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. Part 2 Annexes www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR024 Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. Part 2 Annexes Webb, J.R., Drewitt, A.L. and Measures, G.H. Natural England Published on 15 January 2010 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2010 Project details This report results from work undertaken by the Evidence Team, Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN024 – Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. This report should be cited as: WEBB, J.R., DREWITT, A.L., & MEASURES, G.H., 2009. Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat management. Part 2 Annexes. Natural England Research Reports, Number 024. Project manager Jon Webb Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA Tel: 0300 0605264 Fax: 0300 0603888 [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Managing for species: Integrating the needs of England’s priority species into habitat i management.
  • Anchusa L. and Allied Genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy

    Anchusa L. and Allied Genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy

    Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology Official Journal of the Societa Botanica Italiana ISSN: 1126-3504 (Print) 1724-5575 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tplb20 Anchusa L. and allied genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy F. SELVI & M. BIGAZZI To cite this article: F. SELVI & M. BIGAZZI (1998) Anchusa L. and allied genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy, Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 132:2, 113-142, DOI: 10.1080/11263504.1998.10654198 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263504.1998.10654198 Published online: 18 Mar 2013. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 29 View related articles Citing articles: 20 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tplb20 Download by: [Università di Pisa] Date: 05 November 2015, At: 02:31 PLANT BIOSYSTEMS, 132 (2) 113-142, 1998 Anchusa L. and allied genera (Boraginaceae) in Italy F. SEL VI and M. BIGAZZI received 18 May 1998; revised version accepted 30 July 1998 ABSTRACT - A revision of the Italian entities of Anchusa and of the rdated genera Anchusella, Lycopsis, Cynoglottis, Hormuzakia and Pentaglottis was carried out in view of the poor systematic knowledge of some entities of the national flora. The taxonomic treatment relies on a wide comparative basis, including macro- and micromorphological, karyological, chorological and ecological data. After a general description of some poorly known microCharacters of vegetative and reproductive structures, analytical keys, nomenclatural types, synonymies, descriptions, distribution maps and iconographies are provided for each entity.
  • Ali Hazrat Et Al

    Ali Hazrat Et Al

    Available online freely at www.isisn.org Bioscience Research Print ISSN: 1811-9506 Online ISSN: 2218-3973 Journal by Innovative Scientific Information & Services Network RESEARCH ARTICLE BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2020 17(3): 1996-1999. OPEN ACCESS Medicinal value and Taxonomic survey of Boraginaceae of Dir Kohistan, Pakistan Ali Hazrat1, Gul Rahim1, Abdul Khaliq2, Abdur Rahim3, Ikram Ilahi3, Muhammad Asif Nawaz4, Sidra Pervez5, Zakia Ahmad6, Khan Sher9, Amir Hassan Khan9, Muhammad Romman7, Hafiz Ullah7, Adam Khan8, Abid Ullah1and Mohammad Nisar1 1Department of Botany University of Malakand, Chakdara, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan 2Department of Chemistry Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Sheringal Dir Upper, KP, Pakistan 3Department of Zoology University of Malakand, Chakdara, Dir Lower, KP, Pakistan 4Department of Biotechnology Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Sheringal Dir Upper, KP, Pakistan 5Department of Biochemistry, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University, Peshawar, Pakistan 6Department of Botany University of Swat, KP, Pakistan 7Department of Botany University of Chitral, KP, Pakistan 8Department of Botany University of Buner, KP, Pakistan 9Department of Botany Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University Sheringal Dir Upper, KP, Pakistan *Correspondence: [email protected] Received 21-04-2020, Revised: 01-09-2020, Accepted: 20-09-2020 e-Published: 30-09- 2020 A taxonomic study of the selected family in Dir Kohistan, Pakistan with elevation ranges from 1200-4000 meters. A total of 9 species are recognized belonging to 8 genera. The study conducted on the basis of morphological characters of each species, nomenclature, taxonomic relationships between the species and medicinal survey of the selected family. A key to all the species and genera is given in the results. The morphological characters have a significant role in the identification of species of the selected family.
  • Biodiverse Master

    Biodiverse Master

    Montane, Heath and Bog Habitats MONTANE, HEATH AND BOG HABITATS CONTENTS Montane, heath and bog introduction . 66 Opportunities for action in the Cairngorms . 66 The main montane, heath and bog biodiversity issues . 68 Main threats to UK montane, heath and bog Priority species in the Cairngorms . 72 UK Priority species and Locally important species accounts . 73 Cairngorms montane, heath and bog habitat accounts: • Montane . 84 • Upland heath . 87 • Blanket bog . 97 • Raised bog . 99 ‘Key’ Cairngorms montane, heath and bog species . 100 65 The Cairngorms Local Biodiversity Action Plan MONTANE, HEATH AND BOG INTRODUCTION Around one third of the Cairngorms Partnership area is over 600-650m above sea level (above the natural woodland line, although this is variable from place to place.). This comprises the largest and highest area of montane habitat in Britain, much of which is in a relatively pristine condition. It contains the main summits and plateaux with their associated corries, rocky cliffs, crags, boulder fields, scree slopes and the higher parts of some glens and passes. The vegeta- tion is influenced by factors such as exposure, snow cover and soil type. The main zone is considered to be one of the most spectacular mountain areas in Britain and is recognised nationally and internationally for the quality of its geology, geomorphology and topographic features, and associated soils and biodiversity. c14.5% of the Cairngorms Partnership area (75,000ha) is land above 600m asl. Upland heathland is the most extensive habitat type in the Cairngorms Partnership area, covering c41% of the area, frequently in mosaics with blanket bog.
  • Agarics-Stature-Types.Pdf

    Agarics-Stature-Types.Pdf

    Gilled Mushroom Genera of Chicago Region, by stature type and spore print color. Patrick Leacock – June 2016 Pale spores = white, buff, cream, pale green to Pinkish spores Brown spores = orange, Dark spores = dark olive, pale lilac, pale pink, yellow to pale = salmon, yellowish brown, rust purplish brown, orange pinkish brown brown, cinnamon, clay chocolate brown, Stature Type brown smoky, black Amanitoid Amanita [Agaricus] Vaginatoid Amanita Volvariella, [Agaricus, Coprinus+] Volvopluteus Lepiotoid Amanita, Lepiota+, Limacella Agaricus, Coprinus+ Pluteotoid [Amanita, Lepiota+] Limacella Pluteus, Bolbitius [Agaricus], Coprinus+ [Volvariella] Armillarioid [Amanita], Armillaria, Hygrophorus, Limacella, Agrocybe, Cortinarius, Coprinus+, Hypholoma, Neolentinus, Pleurotus, Tricholoma Cyclocybe, Gymnopilus Lacrymaria, Stropharia Hebeloma, Hemipholiota, Hemistropharia, Inocybe, Pholiota Tricholomatoid Clitocybe, Hygrophorus, Laccaria, Lactarius, Entoloma Cortinarius, Hebeloma, Lyophyllum, Megacollybia, Melanoleuca, Inocybe, Pholiota Russula, Tricholoma, Tricholomopsis Naucorioid Clitocybe, Hygrophorus, Hypsizygus, Laccaria, Entoloma Agrocybe, Cortinarius, Hypholoma Lactarius, Rhodocollybia, Rugosomyces, Hebeloma, Gymnopilus, Russula, Tricholoma Pholiota, Simocybe Clitocyboid Ampulloclitocybe, Armillaria, Cantharellus, Clitopilus Paxillus, [Pholiota], Clitocybe, Hygrophoropsis, Hygrophorus, Phylloporus, Tapinella Laccaria, Lactarius, Lactifluus, Lentinus, Leucopaxillus, Lyophyllum, Omphalotus, Panus, Russula Galerinoid Galerina, Pholiotina, Coprinus+,
  • Scientific Name Common Name Status Agaricus Campestris

    Scientific Name Common Name Status Agaricus Campestris

    Vermillion Highlands Research Recreation and WMA Fungi List Scientific Name Common Name Status Agaricus campestris Meadow Mushroom Agrocybe dura Bearded Fieldcap Agrocybe molesta Bearded Fieldcap Aleurodiscus oakesii Smooth Patch Amanita populiphila Poplar-loving Ringless Amanita Amanita sinicoflava Mandarin Yellow Ringless Amanita Arrhenia epichysium Brown Goblet Artomyces pyxidatus Crown-tipped Coral Bolbitius vitellinus Yellow Fieldcap Boletinellus merulioides Ash-tree Bolete Bulgaria sp. Chromelosporium sp. Collybia dryophila Oak-loving Gymnopus Coltricia perennis Brown Funnel Polypore Coprinus micaceus Mica Cap Coprinus quadrifidus Scaly Inky Cap Coprinus radians Miniature Woolly Inky Cap Coprinus truncorum Tree Coprinus Cortinarius sp. cort Crepidotus applanatus Flat Crep Crepidotus herbarum Crepidotus mollis Soft Crepidotus Crepidotus nephrodes Crepidotus sp. Cyathus stercoreus Dung-loving Bird’s Nest Dacryopinax elegans Ductifera pululahuana White Jelly Fungus Exidia recisa Amber Jelly Fungus Flammulina velutipes Velvet Foot Galerina sp. Ganoderma applanatum Artist’s Conk Gloeoporus dichrous Bicolored Bracket Gymnopus sp. Hapalopilus nidulans Cinnamon Bracket Hohenbuehelia angustata Hohenbuehelia atrocaerulea Hymenochaete rubiginosa Oak Curtain Crust Hypomyces tremellicola Inocybe fastigiata Deadly Inocybe Inocybe sp. Lactarius sp. milk cap Lentinellus ursinus Bear Lentinus Lycoperdon marginatum Peeling Puffball Lycoperdon pusillum Marasmius oreades Fairy Ring Marasmius Marasmius pulcherripes © 2020 MinnesotaSeasons.com. All rights
  • Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Psaphidinae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol

    Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Psaphidinae) SHILAP Revista De Lepidopterología, Vol

    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Guerrero, J. J.; Garre, M.; Rubio, R. M.; Ortiz, A. S. Allophyes corsica (Spuler, 1908) nueva especie para la fauna de España (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Psaphidinae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 42, núm. 168, diciembre, 2014, pp. 615-618 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45540983008 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto 615-618 Allophyes corsica (Spul 26/11/14 11:10 Página 615 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 42 (168), diciembre 2014: 615-618 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 Allophyes corsica (Spuler, 1908) nueva especie para la fauna de España (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Psaphidinae) J. J. Guerrero, M. Garre, R. M. Rubio & A. S. Ortiz Resumen Se cita por primera vez el noctuido Allophyes corsica (Spuler, 1908) en el norte de la Península Ibérica, por lo que se amplía su distribución conocida. Los ejemplares estudiados han sido capturados en el Valle de Arán, en el Pi- rineo de Lérida, donde vuela a finales de octubre. PALABRAS CLAVE: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Psaphidinae, Allophyes corsica, Pirineos, Lérida, España. Allophyes corsica (Spuler, 1908) new species for the fauna of Spain (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Psaphidinae) Abstract The first record of the noctuid Allophyes corsica (Spuler, 1908) is reported from the Iberian Peninsula, increa- sing its known distribution.
  • Woodlice in Britain and Ireland: Distribution and Habitat Is out of Date Very Quickly, and That They Will Soon Be Writing the Second Edition

    Woodlice in Britain and Ireland: Distribution and Habitat Is out of Date Very Quickly, and That They Will Soon Be Writing the Second Edition

    • • • • • • I att,AZ /• •• 21 - • '11 n4I3 - • v., -hi / NT I- r Arty 1 4' I, • • I • A • • • Printed in Great Britain by Lavenham Press NERC Copyright 1985 Published in 1985 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Administrative Headquarters Monks Wood Experimental Station Abbots Ripton HUNTINGDON PE17 2LS ISBN 0 904282 85 6 COVER ILLUSTRATIONS Top left: Armadillidium depressum Top right: Philoscia muscorum Bottom left: Androniscus dentiger Bottom right: Porcellio scaber (2 colour forms) The photographs are reproduced by kind permission of R E Jones/Frank Lane The Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (ITE) was established in 1973, from the former Nature Conservancy's research stations and staff, joined later by the Institute of Tree Biology and the Culture Centre of Algae and Protozoa. ITE contributes to, and draws upon, the collective knowledge of the 13 sister institutes which make up the Natural Environment Research Council, spanning all the environmental sciences. The Institute studies the factors determining the structure, composition and processes of land and freshwater systems, and of individual plant and animal species. It is developing a sounder scientific basis for predicting and modelling environmental trends arising from natural or man- made change. The results of this research are available to those responsible for the protection, management and wise use of our natural resources. One quarter of ITE's work is research commissioned by customers, such as the Department of Environment, the European Economic Community, the Nature Conservancy Council and the Overseas Development Administration. The remainder is fundamental research supported by NERC. ITE's expertise is widely used by international organizations in overseas projects and programmes of research.
  • Protein and Lipid Characterization of Acheta Domesticus, Bombyx Mori, and Locusta Migratoria Dry Flours

    Protein and Lipid Characterization of Acheta Domesticus, Bombyx Mori, and Locusta Migratoria Dry Flours

    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2018 Protein and Lipid Characterization of Acheta domesticus, Bombyx mori, and Locusta migratoria Dry Flours Emily N. Brogan Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Food Chemistry Commons, and the Food Microbiology Commons Recommended Citation Brogan, Emily N., "Protein and Lipid Characterization of Acheta domesticus, Bombyx mori, and Locusta migratoria Dry Flours" (2018). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7498. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7498 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Protein and Lipid Characterization of Acheta domesticus, Bombyx mori, and Locusta migratoria Dry Flours Emily N. Brogan Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design at West Virginia University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Nutritional and Food Science Jacek Jaczynski Ph.D., chair Kristen Matak Ph. D Yong-Lak Park, Ph.
  • The Neuromuscular Mechanism of Stridulation in Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

    The Neuromuscular Mechanism of Stridulation in Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)

    J. Exp. Biol. (1966), 45, isi-164 151 With 8 text-figures Printed in Great Britain THE NEUROMUSCULAR MECHANISM OF STRIDULATION IN CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE) BY DAVID R. BENTLEY AND WOLFRAM KUTSCH Department of Zoology, University of Michigan, Aim Arbor, and Institute for Comparative Animal Physiology, University of Cologne {Received 21 February 1966) INTRODUCTION Study of the insect neuromuscular system appears very promising as a means of explaining behaviour in terms of cellular operation. The relatively small number of neurons, the ganglionic nature of the nervous system, the simplicity of the neuro- muscular arrangement, and the repetitiveness of behavioural sequences all lend them- selves to a solution of this problem. As a result, an increasing number of investigators have been turning their attention to insects and especially to the large orthopterans. Recently, Ewing & Hoyle (1965) and Huber (1965) reported on muscle activity underlying sound production in crickets. The acoustic behaviour is well understood (Alexander, 1961) and in the genera Gryllus, Acheta and Gryllodes communication is mediated by three basic songs composed of three types of pulses. While working independently on this system at the University of Cologne (W.K.) and the University of Michigan (D.B.) using various Gryllus species, we found a number of basic differences between the muscle activity in our crickets and that reported by Ewing & Hoyle (1965) for Acheta domesticus. These two genera, Gryllus and Acheta, are so nearly identical that they are distinguished solely by differences in the male genitalia (Chopard, 1961). The present paper constitutes a survey of muscle activity patterns producing stridulation in four species of field crickets.
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An

    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.