Joint Good Practice Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
D.T1.3.4 - JOINT GOOD PARCTICE REPORT International good practice benchmarking – 04 2020 Joint Good Practice Report Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 1. INTERNATIONAL GOOD PRACTICES ...................................................................................... 4 1.1. AMBERG ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1.1 ZWICKL – DOCUMENTARY FILM FESTIVAL IN SCHWANDORF ......................................................... 4 1.1.2 CONCERT HALL BLAIBACH ........................................................................................ 8 1.1.3 DESIGNWORKSHOP COBURG (COMPETENCE AND INDUSTRY CENTER) AND CREATIVE INDUSTRIES COBURG .......... 12 1.1.4 KÜKO (ARTISTS' COLONY FICHTELGEBIRGE REGISTERED ASSOCIATION) AND CONTROL CENTRE - CREATIVE INDUSTRIES FICHTELGEBIRGE FORUM ....................................................................................... 16 1.1.5 MUH – MAGAZINNE FOR BAVARIAN ASPECTS ..................................................................... 20 1.2. JÁSZBERÉNY ...................................................................................................... 24 1.2.1. HUNGARIAN NATIONAL FILM HISTORY THEME PARK AND DIGITAL POWER-PLANT IN ÓZD – BROWNFIELD DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................................. 24 1.2.2. HANGVILLA (THE TUNING-FORK) – MULTIFUNCTIONAL COMMUNITY SPACE IN VESZPRÉM .......................... 28 1.2.3. ZEMPLÉN FESTIVAL – CLASSICAL MUSIC SURVIVES IN A SECLUDED CORNER OF THE COUNTRY ........................ 32 1.2.4. KISCSŐSZ – A SMALL VILLAGE WITH AMBITIONS IN HERITAGE-BASED DEVELOPMENT ................................. 36 1.3. KAMNIK ........................................................................................................... 40 1.3.1. NAKUPUJEM V MESTU; KRANJ / SHOPPING INITIATIVE IN THE CITY CENTRE; KRANJ ................................ 40 1.3.2. LOCAL MARKET AND IRON WORK MUSEUM IN OLD ABANDONED FACTORY IN JESENICE ............................... 43 1.3.3. SALT PANS MUSEUM, PRODUCTION OF SALT AND NATURAL PARK IN SEČA (PORTOROŽ .............................. 46 1.3.4. HEKOVNIK, (PRIVATE) START-UP CENTRE IN LJUBLJANA.......................................................... 49 1.3.5. CENTER FOR CREATIVE INDUSTRIES, MARIBOR ................................................................... 52 1.3.6. KOVAČNICA CO-WORKING CENTRE IN KRANJ ..................................................................... 55 1.4. NAUMBURG ....................................................................................................... 58 1.4.1. ART DISTRICT „BAUMWOLLSPINNEREI“, LEIPZIG ................................................................. 58 1.4.2. FESTIVAL OF EAST EUROPEAN CINEMA ........................................................................... 61 1.4.3. DIGITAL PLATFORM INKA+ ....................................................................................... 64 1.4.4. KREATIVSALON MAGDEBURG .................................................................................... 67 1.4.5. TRANSFER OF CREATIVE IDEAS (TRANSFER KREATIVER IDEEN) ..................................................... 70 1.4.6. KUNSTHAUS / CO-WORKING SPACE ZEITZ ........................................................................ 73 1.5. VITTORIO VENETO................................................................................................. 76 1.5.1. FACTORY GRISÙ ................................................................................................ 76 1.5.2. CITTADELLARTE ................................................................................................ 82 1.5.3. MO.CA ........................................................................................................ 86 1.5.4. SERINNOVATION ................................................................................................ 91 2. LINZ GOOD PRACTICE FOR STIMULART ................................................................................ 96 2.1. THE STIMULART SUDY TOUR TO LINZ ............................................................................... 96 2.2. WHY LINZ? – LINZ AS A GOOD PRACTICE FOR STIMULART............................................................ 97 2.3. ARS ELECTRONICA CENTER - AS A GOOD PRACTICE ................................................................. 99 2.3.1. FACTS AND FIGURES ............................................................................................ 99 2.3.2. LESSONS LEARNT BY STIMULART PARTNERS ..................................................................... 100 2.4. TABAKFABRIK - AS A GOOD PRACTICE ............................................................................. 101 2.4.1. FACTS AND FIGURES ........................................................................................... 101 2.4.2. LESSONS LEARNT BY STIMULART PARTNERS ..................................................................... 102 International Good Practice Benchmarking Report Page 1 Introduction The document serves as the collection of national good practice benchmarking activity of the Stiumlart partner cities. According to Figure 1. the International Good Practice Benchmarking Report is composed of the partner inputs with individual cases of good practices in a tailored format and also the conclusions of the Linz study tour which took place in September 2019 with the participation of ALL project partners. The International Good Practice Benchmarking Report will assist the partners in the process of Strategy making serving good examples of organizational models, events, financing schemes or entire cultural eco-systems. One of the final products of Stimulart is the CCI Repository, which is intended to offer a wide range of good practices1 to adapt, use and learn from for the Stimulart partnership and also for cities of similar size and complexity in Central Europe. The Repository is to be disseminated widely in order to roll out the results of Stimulart achievements. In Stimulart number of deliverables produce direct and indirect input for the CCI Repository in the series of steps outlined below. 1.International good practices Good Practice Report mainly as source of input to local strategies and action plans 2.Linz Study Tour critical STIMULART assessment local good CCI 3.CCI Mapping including practices REPOSITORY local good practices 4.Stimulart pilots (as good practices) 1. Figure: The flow of Good Practices in Stimulart (Source: Good Practice Benchmarking Methodology Guidelines, 2019 November The Stimulart CCI Repository will be the ultimate product of consistent collection and assessment of good practices arising from partners’ own research, direct experience with solutions, use of adapted new knowledge and also their creative “Stimulart-inspired” CCI products and practices. The related activities start in the framework of work package 1 (WP1) by good practice benchmarking on mainly national level, it proceeds with the identification of local good practices 1 According to a widely used definition: A good practice is a process or methodology that is ethical, fair, and replicable, has been shown to work well, succeeds in achieving its objective(s), and therefore can be recommended as a model, usually described formally and in detail. International Good Practice Benchmarking Report Page 2 as part of the CCI mapping in WP2 and get completed with the analytical description of partner cities’ achievements (strategies, and pilot projects) in WP2 and WP3. The Repository is drafted and finalized (in WP1!) via the critical assessment of the inputs generated all the way in Stimulart implementation. Deliverables with relevance in the production of the CCI good practice Repository: respon- participant source of sible method applied deliverable partners info partner LP all partners personal from personal D.T1.3.1 experience, experience and web web search – search a pool of 1.international desk potential good good practice research (no practices is compiled benchmarking travels!) after a critical assessment 5-10 are shortlisted LP - Linz study on-site experience, D.T1.3.3 2.Linz Study tour relevant literature, Tour experience websites etc. processed INTERMEDIARY PRODUCT: LP integrating document D.T1.3.4 GOOD PRACTICE using products of 1 REPORT and 2 D.T1.3.1 International good practice benchmarking: Collecting good practices applicable to local CCI strategy development from recognised European CCI centres through desk research & benchmarking. Assessment & categorisation of findings including comparison to local practices collected during CCI Mapping. D.T1.3.3 Implementation of Good Practice Study Tour to Linz: 2-day study tour for 2 participants+1 stakeholder / PP, including catering, accommodation, meetings and visits to outstanding CCI products and achievements. The program ends with wrap-up session to identify & assess main learnings & applicable practices. D.T1.3.4 Preparation of a joint Good Practice Report: Applicable practices collected during international benchmarking, CCI Mapping and Good Practice Study Tour, assessing their application criteria & benefits for various economic environments, to help identifying relevant tools & methods