Digitalisation in Norwegian Tunnelling Publication No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Digitalisation in Norwegian Tunnelling Publication No DIGITALISATION IN NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING DIGITALISATION Publication no. 28 Postboks 2752 – Solli, 0204 Oslo Digitalisation in Norwegian PUBLICATION NO. 28 NO. PUBLICATION [email protected] | www.nff.no | www.tunnel.no Tunnelling DIGITALISATION IN NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING Publication No. 28 NORWEGIAN TUNNELLING SOCIETY 2019 DESIGN BY KONSIS, OSLO, NORWAY Norwegian Tunnelling Society Publication no. 28 PUBLICATION NO. 28 © Norsk Forening for Fjellsprengningsteknikk NFF ISBN 978-82-92641-45-3 Front page image: Bever Control Layout: Konsis Grafisk AS [email protected] www.konsis.no DISCLAIMER Its content reflects the state of knowledge at the time of completion. Whilst every effort has been made to assure the quality of the publication, it may nevertheless contain errors and omissions. NFF and/or the authors are not liable for any errors and/or omissions in the publication or for the consequences thereof. 2 OurNorwegian expertise Tunnelling Society takes you further!Publication no. 28 Codan AS is a one stop shopping supplier of hoses, couplings and the leading supplier of packers and grouting and develops, sells injection- equipment for the construction and tunnel industry in Norway. Our products 5 Our products are selected from well-known suppliers of high quality- products according to the latest international standards. It’s a question of continual development and improvement in order to be able to show the market our solutions that both simplify and enhance the customers situation in an economical and environmentally friendly way. We focus on HSE, expertise, helpfulness and high delivery reliability. 3 Codan AS Karihaugveien 102, 1086 Oslo - Tel. 22 90 65 50 GMA AB Rönna väg 2, - 686 31 Sunne SE www.codan-gummi.no – fi [email protected] Phone: 0046-565 128 50/0047-913 00 850 - www.gma.se - [email protected] Norwegian Tunnelling Society Publication no. 28 Let the rig do the drill plans United. Inspired. With the Dynamic Tunneling Package you can create drill plans directly at the face of the tunnel. Simply download the contours of the tunnel to the drill rig together with a drill plan rule file and the rig will create drill plans tailored for the section it’s currently navigated on. 4 epiroc.com Norwegian Tunnelling Society Publication no. 28 Contents Preface ..............................................................................................................................................................9 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 11 Scope of the publication ................................................................................................................................... 11 Content .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Timeline .............................................................................................................................................................12 Definition of key terms ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Building Information Modelling ....................................................................................................................... 14 Table of key terms .............................................................................................................................................15 1. Disciplines for Digitalisation ............................................................................................................19 1.1. Digitalisation of ground conditions in the engineering phase ..............................................................19 1.1.1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................19 1.1.2. Basic models: Geological pre-investigations ...................................................................................................20 1.1.3. Basic model: Geological information ................................................................................................................. 25 1.1.4. Discipline model: (Engineering) geological tunnelling information .......................................................29 1.1.5. Geological models for the construction phase ..............................................................................................29 1.1.6. As-Built geological documentation ....................................................................................................................42 1.1.7. Concluding remarks ................................................................................................................................................44 1.1.8. Further work .............................................................................................................................................................44 1.2. Production Data and Planning ...............................................................................................................48 1.2.1. Background ................................................................................................................................................................48 1.2.2. Mutual file-/data format ........................................................................................................................................49 1.2.3. Production data .......................................................................................................................................................49 1.2.4. Scanning .................................................................................................................................................................... 53 1.2.5. Future development ............................................................................................................................................... 53 1.3. Machine Operation .................................................................................................................................55 1.3.1. Drilling and navigation ......................................................................................................................................... 55 1.3.2. Technical infrastructure, Wi-Fi.............................................................................................................................58 1.3.3. Pre - grouting ..........................................................................................................................................................58 1.3.4. Shotcrete ....................................................................................................................................................................64 1.3.5. Rock bolting ..............................................................................................................................................................66 1.4. Water and Frost Protection .................................................................................................................... 74 1.4.1. Water and frost protection types used in Norwegian tunnels ................................................................... 74 1.4.2. Water and frost protection supported by digital tools ............................................................................... 74 1.5. Technical Installations ............................................................................................................................76 1.5.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 76 1.5.2. Technical installations ............................................................................................................................................ 76 1.5.3. Structures................................................................................................................................................................... 78 1.5.4. Conclusive remarks .................................................................................................................................................80 5 Norwegian Tunnelling Society Publication no. 28 1.6. Environmental Monitoring ......................................................................................................................81 1.6.1. Early establishment ..................................................................................................................................................81 1.6.2. Items for online monitoring .................................................................................................................................82 1.6.3. Pore pressure monitoring program ...................................................................................................................82 1.6.4. InSAR ..........................................................................................................................................................................83 1.6.5. GIS-model for structural borne noise ...............................................................................................................85 2. Norwegian clients: status
Recommended publications
  • 289 Combination of Bidirectional-Cell Test and Conventional Head-Down
    Orchard Central, Singapore Fellenius, B.H., and Tan, S.A., 2010. Combination of bidirectional-cell test and conventional head-down test. The Art of Foundation Engineering Practice, ""Honoring Clyde Baker", ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication, Edited by M.H. Hussein, J.B. Anderson, and W.M. Camp, GSP 198, pp. 240-259. Combination of bidirectional-cell test and conventional head-down test Bengt H. Fellenius1), M.ASCE and Tan Siew Ann2), M.ASCE 1) 2475 Rothesay Avenue, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 2B9. <[email protected]> 2) Civil Engineering Department, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260. <[email protected]> ABSTRACT. Bidirectional-cell tests were performed in Singapore on four bored piles in a residual soil and underlying weathered, highly fractured bedrock called the Bukit Timah Granite formation. Two of the piles were 1.2 m diameter, uninstrumented, and 28 m and 38 m long. The other two were strain-gage instrumented, 1.0 m diameter piles, both 37 m long. The latter tests combined the cell test with conventional head-down testing. Analysis of the test results indicated that the pile toe stiffness was low. The evaluation of the strain-gage data showed that the pile material modulus was a function of the induced strain. The desired axial working load was 10 MN, and the combined cell and head-down tests correlated to a head-down test with a maximum applied load of 38 MN, which, although smaller than the ultimate resistance of the piles, was taken as the capacity of piles constructed similar to the second set of test piles at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests in Cohesive Soils
    Final Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 INTERPRETATION OF CONE PENETRATION TESTS IN COHESIVE SOILS by Kwang Kyun Kim Graduate Research Assistant Monica Prezzi Assistant Professor and Rodrigo Salgado Professor School of Civil Engineering Purdue University Joint Transportation Research Program Project No. C-36-45T File No. 6-18-18 SPR-2632 Conducted in Cooperation with the Indiana Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration or the Indiana Department of Transportation. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana December 2006 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Interpretation of Cone Penetration tests in Cohesive Soils December 2006 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kwang Kyun Kim and Rodrigo Salgado FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/22 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Joint Transportation Research Program 550 Stadium Mall Drive Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-2051 11. Contract or Grant No. SPR-2632 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Indiana Department of Transportation State Office Building Final Report 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Manual
    PRODUCT MANUAL The Sami of Finnmark. Photo: Terje Rakke/Nordic Life/visitnorway.com. Norwegian Travel Workshop 2014 Alta, 31 March-3 April Sorrisniva Igloo Hotel, Alta. Photo: Terje Rakke/Nordic Life AS/visitnorway.com INDEX - NORWEGIAN SUPPLIERS Stand Page ACTIVITY COMPANIES ARCTIC GUIDE SERVICE AS 40 9 ARCTIC WHALE TOURS 57 10 BARENTS-SAFARI - H.HATLE AS 21 14 NEW! DESTINASJON 71° NORD AS 13 34 FLÅM GUIDESERVICE AS - FJORDSAFARI 200 65 NEW! GAPAHUKEN DRIFT AS 23 70 GEIRANGER FJORDSERVICE AS 239 73 NEW! GLØD EXPLORER AS 7 75 NEW! HOLMEN HUSKY 8 87 JOSTEDALSBREEN & STRYN ADVENTURE 205-206 98 KIRKENES SNOWHOTEL AS 19-20 101 NEW! KONGSHUS JAKT OG FISKECAMP 11 104 LYNGSFJORD ADVENTURE 39 112 NORTHERN LIGHTS HUSKY 6 128 PASVIKTURIST AS 22 136 NEW! PÆSKATUN 4 138 SCAN ADVENTURE 38 149 NEW! SEIL NORGE AS (SAILNORWAY LTD.) 95 152 NEW! SEILAND HOUSE 5 153 SKISTAR NORGE 150 156 SORRISNIVA AS 9-10 160 NEW! STRANDA SKI RESORT 244 168 TROMSØ LAPLAND 73 177 NEW! TROMSØ SAFARI AS 48 178 TROMSØ VILLMARKSSENTER AS 75 179 TRYSILGUIDENE AS 152 180 TURGLEDER AS / ENGHOLM HUSKY 12 183 TYSFJORD TURISTSENTER AS 96 184 WHALESAFARI LTD 54 209 WILD NORWAY 161 211 ATTRACTIONS NEW! ALTA MUSEUM - WORLD HERITAGE ROCK ART 2 5 NEW! ATLANTERHAVSPARKEN 266 11 DALSNIBBA VIEWPOINT 1,500 M.A.S.L 240 32 DESTINATION BRIKSDAL 210 39 FLØIBANEN AS 224 64 FLÅMSBANA - THE FLÅM RAILWAY 229-230 67 HARDANGERVIDDA NATURE CENTRE EIDFJORD 212 82 I Stand Page HURTIGRUTEN 27-28 96 LOFOTR VIKING MUSEUM 64 110 MAIHAUGEN/NORWEGIAN OLYMPIC MUSEUM 190 113 NATIONAL PILGRIM CENTRE 163 120 NEW! NORDKAPPHALLEN 15 123 NORWEGIAN FJORD CENTRE 242 126 NEW! NORSK FOLKEMUSEUM 140 127 NORWEGIAN GLACIER MUSEUM 204 131 STIFTELSEN ALNES FYR 265 164 CARRIERS ACP RAIL INTERNATIONAL 251 2 ARCTIC BUSS LOFOTEN 56 8 AVIS RENT A CAR 103 13 BUSSRING AS 47 24 COLOR LINE 107-108 28 COMINOR AS 29 29 FJORD LINE AS 263-264 59 FJORD1 AS 262 62 NEW! H.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Teknologiske Løysingar
    Coastal Highway Route E39 Project aicep 26th March 2015 Lisboa Kjartan J Hove/ Kjersti Kvalheim Dunham / Jan Eirik Henning Norwegian Public Roads Administration National Transport Plan 2014-2023 Road funding Total budget - national roads (incl. toll road funding) 3.8 4.07 4.8 5.8 Annual average – billion EUR Meeting a Growing Market • More efficient planning • Faster and less fragmented construction • Cooperation with the consultant- and construction industries • National and international competition • Predictable funding Illustration: Colourbox National public road fundings 2014 – 2017 annualy average ~ 25% Operations and maintenance Investments ~ 75% – new projects Investments: NPRA’s contract portfolio Distribution of roughly 500 contracts 50 contracts large > € 6,6 mill. 150 contracts€ 1,3 – 6,6 mill. small 300 < € 1,3 mill. contracts Our aims as project portfolio owners Diversity and competition in the market Make it possible also for small and medium sized contractors to compete. Occupational health, safety and environment (HSE) We want to be exemplary within HSE. We want to be a force on improving methods, materials and technical solutions that enhance HSE. HSE – The staff of the sub-contractors appear to carry the largest risk Measures taken in the contracts: Maximum two levels of sub-contractors below the main contractor. The contractor’s own work force shall carry out at least 25% of the work (man-hours) Person(s) with the overall daily administrative responsibility shall be part of the contractor’s own staff. Sanction clauses Procurement Procedure, Road sector Goverend by EU procurement directive 2004/18/EEC Open competition, announcement in the EU database (TED) The respective NPRA Regional office (5) is the Contracting Agency Commonly 2 – 5 tenderers on large contracts Photo:Photo: Knut Kjell Opeide Soltvedt Project delivery and contract types A professional judgment is made to find the most suitable in each individual case.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Specification Series 10000 Piling Works
    TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 10000 PILING WORKS Series 10000 –Piling Works NRAP-MoPW TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PART 10000 - PILING TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Number Page 10000 Board Cast in Place Piles 10-4 10001 Description 10-4 10100 Materials 10-4 10101 Steel Classing 10-4 10102 Concrete 10-5 10103 Reinforcement 10-5 10104 Drilling Fluid 10-5 10200 Construction Methods 10-5 10201 General 10-5 10202 Setting out Piles 10-6 10203 Diameter of Piles 10-7 10204 Tolerance 10-7 10205 Boring 10-7 10206 Placing Reinforcement 10-9 10207 Placing Concrete 10-9 10208 Extraction of Temporary Casing 10-10 10209 Temporary Support 10-10 10210 Records 10-12 10210 Measures in Case of Rejected Casing 10-12 10212 Measurement 10-12 10213 Payment 10-12 10300 Precast Concrete Units for River Training and Retaining Structures 10-13 10301 Description 10-13 10302 Materials 10-13 10303 Construction Methods 10-13 10304 King Post & Anchor Piles 10-14 10305 Precast Planks 10-14 10306 Tolerance 10-14 10307 Measurement 10-14 10308 Payment 10-14 10400 Pile Test Loading 10-15 10401 General 10-15 10402 Definitions 10-15 10403 Supervision 10-15 10500 Safety Precautions 10-16 10501 General 10-16 10502 Kentledge 10-16 10503 Tension Piles and Ground Anchors 10-16 10504 Testing Equipment 10-16 UNOPS-Afghanistan PART 10-1 Series 10000 –Piling Works NRAP-MoPW 10600 Construction of a Pilot Pile to be Test Loaded 10-17 10601 Notice of Construction 10-17 10602 Method of Constructions 10-17 10603 Boring or Driving Record 10-17 10604 Cut-Off Level 10-17 10605 Pile Head for Compression
    [Show full text]
  • Representing the SPANISH RAILWAY INDUSTRY
    Mafex corporate magazine Spanish Railway Association Issue 20. September 2019 MAFEX Anniversary years representing the SPANISH RAILWAY INDUSTRY SPECIAL INNOVATION DESTINATION Special feature on the Mafex 7th Mafex will spearhead the European Nordic countries invest in railway International Railway Convention. Project entitled H2020 RailActivation. innovation. IN DEPT MAFEX ◗ Table of Contents MAFEX 15TH ANNIVERSARY / EDITORIAL Mafex reaches 15 years of intense 05 activity as a benchmark association for an innovative, cutting-edge industry 06 / MAFEX INFORMS with an increasingly marked presence ANNUAL PARTNERS’ MEETING: throughout the world. MAFEX EXPANDS THE NUMBER OF ASSOCIATES AND BOLSTERS ITS BALANCE APPRAISAL OF THE 7TH ACTIVITIES FOR 2019 INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY CONVENTION The Association informed the Annual Once again, the industry welcomed this Partners’ Meeting of the progress made biennial event in a very positive manner in the previous year, the incorporation which brought together delegates from 30 of new companies and the evolution of countries and more than 120 senior official activities for the 2019-2020 timeframe. from Spanish companies and bodies. MEMBERS NEWS MAFEX UNVEILS THE 26 / RAILACTIVACTION PROJECT The RailActivation project was unveiled at the Kick-Off Meeting of the 38 / DESTINATION European Commission. SCANDINAVIAN COUNTRIES Denmark, Norway and Sweden have MAFEX PARTICIPTES IN THE investment plans underway to modernise ENTREPRENEURIAL ENCOUNTER the railway network and digitise services. With the Minister of Infrastructure The three countries advance towards an Development of the United Arab innovative transport model. Emirates, Abdullah Belhaif Alnuami held in the office of CEOE. 61 / INTERVIEW Jan Schneider-Tilli, AGREEMENT BETWEEN BCIE AND Programme Director of Banedanmark. MAFEX To promote and support internationalisation in the Spanish railway sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 13 Vol. 2
    Svensk Djupstabilisering Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Centre Report 13 International Conference on Deep Mixing Best Practice and Recent Advances Volume 2 Volume 2 Proceedings of the International Conference on Deep Mixing – Best Practice and Recent Advances, Deep Mixing’05 Stockholm, Sweden, May 23 – 25, 2005 SD Report 13, Volume 1 – 2 Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Centre, c/o Swedish Geotechnical Institute SE-581 93 Linkoping When using material from these Proceedings full credit shall be given to the conference and the author(s). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in these proceeding volumes are those of the author(s). The proceedings may be purchased from the Information Service, Swedish Geotechnical Institute SE-581 93 Linköping, Sweden Tel: 013 – 20 18 20 (int +46 13 201820) Fax: 013 – 20 19 14 (int +46 13 201914) E-mail: [email protected] ISSN 1402-2036 ISRN SD-R--05/13--SE Conference Photos: Ulf Lonäs, Svensk Bergs- & Brukstidning and SGI Swedish Deep Stabilization Research Centre wish to acknowledge the Swedish National Rail Administration, SSAB Merox AB and SMA Svenska Mineral AB for their generous support to the publishing of the Proceedings of Deep Mixing ´05. II Deep Mixing´05 Volume 2 Preface The International Conference on Deep Mixing – Best Prac- discussed important topics, covering field and laboratory test- tice and Recent Advances (Deep Mixing ´05) was organised ing, design aspects and solidification of contaminated soils. by the Swedish Deep Stabilization Centre. Particular empha- In one session, the results of case histories were presented. sis was placed on the exchange of practical experience from During the conference, a Technical Exhibition was held, where the application of dry and wet mixing methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Upcoming Projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR Is a State-Owned Company Respon- Sible for the National Railway Infrastructure
    1 Upcoming projects Infrastructure Construction Division About Bane NOR Bane NOR is a state-owned company respon- sible for the national railway infrastructure. Our mission is to ensure accessible railway infra- structure and efficient and user-friendly ser- vices, including the development of hubs and goods terminals. The company’s main responsible are: • Planning, development, administration, operation and maintenance of the national railway network • Traffic management • Administration and development of railway property Bane NOR has approximately 4,500 employees and the head office is based in Oslo, Norway. All plans and figures in this folder are preliminary and may be subject for change. 3 Never has more money been invested in Norwegian railway infrastructure. The InterCity rollout as described in this folder consists of several projects. These investments create great value for all travelers. In the coming years, departures will be more frequent, with reduced travel time within the InterCity operating area. We are living in an exciting and changing infrastructure environment, with a high activity level. Over the next three years Bane NOR plans to introduce contracts relating to a large number of mega projects to the market. Investment will continue until the InterCity rollout is completed as planned in 2034. Additionally, Bane NOR plans together with The Norwegian Public Roads Administration, to build a safer and faster rail and road system between Arna and Stanghelle on the Bergen Line (western part of Norway). We rely on close
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland, Norway & Faroes
    Port Handbook Chapter A - The Baltic Chapter B - United Kingdom & Ireland Chapter C - Atlantic Europe Chapter D - Iceland, Norway & Faroes Chapter E - Associated Members Copyright 2021 Cruise Europe Word of the chairman Matching cruise industry growth and cruise port capacities Cruise Europe and its more than 100 member ports between Gibraltar in the South, Kirkenes in the North and Lulea in the Baltic still has the potential for growth. Only 75% of the potential cruise ports along the Atlantic coast are members; also one has to include the potential of the cruise ports in Greenland and the area east of the North Cape. The tourist organisations of the ports, the regions, the countries can help as members to make Cruise Europe stronger in marketing the destination Northern Europe to the cruise lines. The aim for Cruise Europe is to match the ongoing growth of the cruise industry in offering better infrastructure in the member ports, which means more cruise terminals, or to point out the diversity of the many destinations and attractions in Northern Europe. Cruise Europe has to open a dialogue with the cruise lines with the intention to spread the growing number of cruise ships and the even bigger cruise passenger capacities over more ports, over more cruise areas, over more countries. The success of the Baltic is also possible in the areas of West Europe, of UK & Ireland and of Norway and Iceland. Cruise lines have to be convinced that all four cruise areas in Northern Europe have equal attractions and many Captain Michael McCarthy good ports to host the growing cruise fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report | 2016
    Annual Report | 2016 A word from the CEO Strategy towards 2018 This is Norconsult Our market areas Selected projects 2016 Board of Directors’ report Consolidated financial statements Offices and addresses Career Barometer # 1 (2016, 2015) Employees 3,250 Contents 2016 3,250 2015 3,090 2014 A word from the CEO 4 2,900 2013 Strategy towards 2018 6 2,650 2012 This is Norconsult 8 2,400 Our market areas 20 Selected projects 2016 28 Board of Directors’ report 40 Consolidated financial statements 56 Sales Offices and addresses 60 4,236 MNOK MNOK 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 A word from the CEO Strategy towards 2018 This is Norconsult Our market areas Selected projects 2016 Board of Directors’ report Consolidated financial statements Offices and addresses A word from the CEO ”At Norconsult we create added value by maintaining close proximity to our clients and the market and by using smart and effective working methods.” 2016 was a good year for Norconsult. We continued to deliver profitable growth in a market in which prices are coming under pressure, competition is intensifying and clients’ requirements are changing. The industry is in a state of constant flux, year with record revenues of NOK 4.2 framework agreement with the City of with changes taking place more quickly billion, and a solid bottom line. We have Copenhagen to expand and convert a and less predictably than in the past. worked on more than 20,000 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2004
    Annual Report 2004 1 Contents Time for trains 3 What is Jernbaneverket? 4 Organisational structure 5 Safety 6 Finance and efficiency 10 Operations 10 Maintenance 11 Capital expenditure – rail network development 12 State Accounts for 2004 14 Human resources 16 Personnel and working environment 16 JBV Ressurs 16 Competitiveness 18 Train companies operating on the national rail network 18 Infrastructure capacity – Jernbaneverket’s core product 18 Operating parameters 19 Key figures for the national rail network 21 Traffic volumes on the national rail network 23 Punctuality 24 Environmental protection 26 International activities 28 Contact details 30 www.jernbaneverket.no 2 Cover: Jernbaneverket’s celebrations to mark 150 years of Norwegian railways. Photo: Øystein Grue Time for trains The past year marked the 150th anniversary of the railways in Norway and proved a worthy celebration. Punctuality has never been better, rail traffic is growing, and in summer 2004 the Norwegian Parliament took the historic decision to invest NOK 26.4 billion in developing a competitive rail network over the ten years from 2006 to 2015. In other words, the anniversary year not only provided the opportunity for a nostalgic look back, but also confirmed that the railways will continue to play a central role in the years ahead. In line with Parliament’s decision, value our good working relationship with autumn 2005. This brings us one step clo- Jernbaneverket has drawn up an action the trade unions. The railway has a culture ser to our goal of an efficient, modern rail programme which, if implemented, will and a historic legacy which need to be network in the Oslo region.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydhavna (Sjursøya) – an Area with Increased Risk
    REPORT Sydhavna (Sjursøya) – an area with increased risk February 2014 Published by: Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection (DSB) 2015 ISBN: 978-82-7768-350-8 (PDF) Graphic production: Erik Tanche Nilssen AS, Skien Sydhavna (Sjursøya) – an area with increased risk February 2014 CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 01 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.1 Mandat .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Questions and scope ............................................................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 Organisation of the project ................................................................................................................................................. 13 1.4
    [Show full text]