DOCSLIB.ORG

Israel and Egypt: UNEF Enters Gaza; Other Developments • Withdrawal Pledge • Lodge Statement • Other UN Comment • U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Israel and Egypt: UNEF Enters Gaza; Other Developments • Withdrawal Pledge • Lodge Statement • Other UN Comment • U.S Issue Date: March 06, 1957 Israel and Egypt: UNEF Enters Gaza; Other Developments • Withdrawal Pledge • Lodge Statement • Other UN Comment • U.S. Assures Arabs • Israeli Delay • Eisenhower Appeals • Withdrawal Set • Dulles on Conditions • Arab Refugees Advance units of the UN Emergency Force occupied positions in the Gaza Strip March 6 in the wake of withdrawing Israeli troops and civil administrators. The Israelis had begun their pullback behind the 1949 Israeli-Egyptian armistice line earlier March 6 under orders issued March 4 by Israeli Premier David Ben- Gurion, who agreed to the withdrawal under U.S. diplomatic pressure despite much opposition in Israel. Arrangements for transfer of the Gaza and Sinai area to the UNEF were approved by General Moshe Dayan, Israeli Army Chief of Staff, and Major General E. L. M. Burns, UNEF cmndr., when they met March 4 at Lydda Airport, Israel. [See 1956 Middle East: UN Troops Patrol Suez; Other Developments] Withdrawal Pledge Israeli Foreign Minister Golda Meir, in a statement March 1 to the UN General Assembly in New York, promised the "full and prompt withdrawal" of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip and Sharm el Sheikh area of Sinai. Reminding the assembly of pledges by the U.S. and other "leading maritime powers" to safeguard Israel's security and navigation rights, she proposed immediate meetings between the Israeli and UN military commanders "to arrange for the [UN] to take over its responsibilities" in the Gaza and Gulf of Aqaba areas. [See 1957 Israel and Egypt: Sanctions Asked; Other Developments] The Israeli withdrawal statement followed intensive negotiations February 27-28 in Washington and New York on a compromise formula acceptable to Israel, the UN Assembly and Arab states. UN Assembly action was suspended pending the outcome of talks among Mrs. Meir, Israeli Ambassador-to-U.S. Abba Eban, U.S. State Secretary John Foster Dulles and visiting French Premier Guy Mollet and Foreign Minister Christian Pineau. Eban called on Dulles February 28 to inform him of the withdrawal decision. [See 1957 Israel and Egypt: Sanctions Asked; Other Developments] The Israeli withdrawal pledge announced in the UN by Mrs. Meir was made subject to these "assumptions": • On completion of Israel's evacuation of the Gaza Strip: (a) the UNEF "will be deployed in Gaza" and "exclusively" assume control of the area; (b) the UN "will be the agency" responsible for administration of the zone "for a transitory period from the takeover until there is a peace settlement...or a definitive agreement" on the area's future. • On completion of withdrawals from the Sharm el Sheikh area: (a) UNEF units "will move into the Strait of Tiran" zone for "prevention of belligerent acts" by Egypt; (b) "any proposal for the withdrawal" of occupying UNEF forces from southern Sinai "would first come to the [UNEF] Advisory Com., which represents the General Assembly." [See 1956 Middle East: UN Policing Plan Gains; Other Developments] The Meir statement warned: "If conditions are created in the Gaza Strip which indicate a return to the conditions of deterioration which existed previously, Israel would defend its freedom to act to defend its rights." "Interference by armed force" with Israeli shipping in the Gulf of Aqaba "will be regarded by Israel as an attack entitling her to exercize her inherent right of self-defense...and to take all measures as are necessary." [See 1957 Israel and Egypt: Sanctions Asked; Other Developments] Mrs. Meir concluded with an appeal to the Arab states to join with Israel in a program for "the betterment and progress and development of all our lands and all our people." "There is no limit to what we are prepared to contribute so that all of us, together, can live to see a day of happiness for our peoples and see again from that region a great contribution to peace and happiness for all humanity." Lodge Statement U.S. Ambassador-to-UN Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. March 1 noted Israel's "assumptions" underlying the withdrawal statement and said that the U.S. did "not consider that these declarations make Israel's withdrawal 'conditional.' " Lodge asserted that, "for the most part," Israel's "expectations" had been contained in assembly resolutions and UN Secretary General Dag Hammarskjold's February 26 report and seemed "not unreasonable in the light of the prior actions of this assembly." He urged solution of the Gaza dispute "within the framework of the [1949] armistice agreement." [See 1957 Israel and Egypt: Sanctions Asked; Other Developments] Other UN Comment Egyptian Foreign Minister Mahmoud Fawzi said March 1 that Egypt considered the assembly "unanimous" in expecting "immediate and unconditional" withdrawals. French delegate Guillaume Georges-Picot March 1 backed the Israeli "assumptions" as "legitimate and reasonable." He promised that French ships would use the Gulf of Aqaba. Commander Allan Noble, British UN delegate, said March 4 that Britain would send vessels through the gulf. He termed "reasonable" Israel's demands that the UN "continue to exercise its responsibilities in the Gaza Strip." [See 1957 Israel and Egypt: Sanctions Asked; Other Developments] Soviet UN Representative Arkady A. Sobolev charged Israel March 4 with imposing conditions that would establish the UNEF on Egyptian territory "for an indefinite time" in "violation of the...rights of Egypt and the other Arab states." He said that the U.S., in its negotiations with Israel, had placed "itself above the United Nations" and assumed "the role of an arbitor" in the Mid-East. Indian UN delegate Arthur S. Lall asserted March 4 that the UNEF "cannot be kept anywhere on Egyptian territory without the freely given consent of Egypt." [See 1957 Egypt and Israel: Israeli Withdrawal Offer; Other Developments] U.S. Assures Arabs State Secretary Dulles met March 1 with representatives of 9 Arab states to assure them that Israel had been given "no promises or concessions whatsoever" by the U.S. in return for the withdrawal pledge. Dulles made clear that the U.S. had rejected Israeli demands for "conditions" but had agreed to Israeli "assumptions" on future U.S. policy in and out of the UN. He said that stories of a "secret understanding" between Israel and the U.S. were "Communist propaganda" and that American negotiations with Israel had been conducted solely within the framework imposed by the UN General Assembly. [See 1957 Israel and Egypt: Sanctions Asked; Other Developments] Farid Zeineddine, Syrian Ambassador to U.S. and spokesman for the 9 Arab nations (Syria, Egypt, Iraq, Sudan, Lebanon, Jordan, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Libya), reportedly was unimpressed by Dulles' statement but promised that the Arab bloc would "wait and see." (Egyptian Foreign Minister Fawzi had told the General Assembly February 28 that "Israel's withdrawal must not be the result of a bargain" or promises made by "people who have no right" to carry on negotiations. Fawzi charged that the U.S. had "ignored the very existence of Egypt and the [UN]" to "satisfy and be at the service of Israel.") [See 1957 Israel and Egypt: Sanctions Asked; Other Developments] Israeli Delay Israel March 2 ordered troop withdrawals delayed, postponed the meeting of Israeli and UNEF commanders and ordered Eban to seek "clarification" of the U.S. position on UN control of the Gaza and Sharm el Sheikh areas. The delay, coming after an Israeli Cabt. meeting March 1 had failed to approve the withdrawal orders, was said to have been caused by U.S. Ambassador-to-UN Lodge's lack of explicit support for Israel's "assumptions," as well as his reference to a Gaza settlement within the framework of the 1949 armistice, in his March 1 statement to the UN. Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesmen said March 2 that the postponement was caused "not so much [by] the things he [Lodge] said, but the things he left unsaid." Eban met with Dulles in Washington March 2 to relay the Israeli request and "report on his impressions concerning what transpired in the General Assembly" March 1. U.S. State Department spokesmen insisted March 2 that Israel had known the contents of the Lodge statement in advance. Eisenhower Appeals In a personal letter to Ben-Gurion, President Eisenhower March 2 called on Israel to withdraw "with the utmost speed" in the knowledge that "Israel will have no cause to regret having thus conformed to the strong sentiment of the world community." The President wrote that the U.S. always had supported "a united effort by all of the nations" to bring "more stable" conditions to the area after completion of the withdrawals. Mr. Eisenhower expressed belief that "hopes and expectations" voiced in the UN by Mrs. Meir were "reasonable." He pledged that the U.S. "will seek that such hopes prove not to be in vain." [See 1957 Israel and Egypt: Israel vs. Withdrawals; Other Developments] Withdrawal Set Ben-Gurion March 4 ordered Israeli forces to begin their withdrawals from occupied Egyptian territory. Israeli spokesmen said that the withdrawals, ordered following an all-night meeting between Ben-Gurion and Mapai (Labor) Party leaders, would open either "a new period of peaceful relations" or be "the prelude to an even greater tragedy than prevailed before the Sinai campaign." They warned that Israel "definitely" would "send ships into the [Suez] Canal as soon as possible" to test Egypt's intentions. Ben-Gurion went before the Israeli Knesset (Parlt.) in Jerusalem March 5 to defend his withdrawal orders. He conceded that "there is no certainty that the Egyptians will not return [to the Gaza Strip] as a civilian administration or through military occupation," or that UNEF forces would be kept at the entrance to the Gulf of Aqaba. He insisted, however, that the problems of Israeli security and freedom of navigation had become "a question of conscience for many states." He urged that the Israeli people accept the "settlement" offered by the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Egypt's Union with Syria, Its Impact and the June 1967
    Egypt’s Union with Syria, its Impact and the June 1967 War S. Qalb-i-Abid / Massarrat Abid Introduction Four hundred and sixty five million people of the Middle East are almost of the same composition. They share a common language, culture and religion and believe in the concept of the Arab Nationalism - Umma al Arabiya. The Arabic language is a potent unifying bondage. Although spoken Arabic changes widely from area to area, the literary language is more or less the same throughout the Arab world; and all those who speak Arabic are regarded as a part of the Arab Nation. This sacred language of Islam and Quran is the common bondage among the Arabs. The Arab Middle East also comprises the Holy Places for the three major religions of the world - Islam, Christianity and Judaism and remains the place of origin of their faith. Religion has thus always played a major role in political, economic, and social aspects of life for very many years; and in all likelihood, it will also continue to be a significant factor in future politics of this region. Middle East therefore is rightly described as the cradle of Islam. The importance of Middle East in world affairs has been emphasized by the fact that two world wars have had their Middle Eastern commands; and events there, though not principal, weighed heavily on the final results of these gigantic international conflicts. Egypt’s Union with Syria 165 The Middle Eastern politics has therefore always been very important for the World. Politics, transportation, communications, markets, military strategy, imperialism, nationalism, culture, religion and natural resources of this area had always great attraction1 for the “Big Powers” as well as small countries.
    [Show full text]
  • August 11, 1967 Notes on Yugoslav-Egyption Talks
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified August 11, 1967 Notes on Yugoslav-Egyption Talks Citation: “Notes on Yugoslav-Egyption Talks,” August 11, 1967, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Tito Presidential Material Archives. Translated by Lana Orbadovic. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/113628 Summary: Summaries of talks between Tito and Nasser in Cairo and Alexandria, 11-18 August 1967. Original Language: Serbo-Croatian Contents: English Translation NOTES REGARDING YUGOSLAV – EGYPTIAN TALKS The following participated on the Yugoslav side: President of the Republic Josip Broz Tito, members of the Federation Council Edvard Kardelj and Vladimir Popovic, Vice President of the Federal Executive Council Kiro Gligorov, deputy State Secretary for Foreign Affairs Miso Pavicevic and Ambassador of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to the UAR Salko Fejic; on the UAR side: President of the UAR Gamal Abdel Nasser, Vice Presidents Zakaria Mohieddin and Hussein El Shafei, President of the National Assembly Anwar El Sadat, Vice Presidents of the Republic Ali Sabri and Mohammed Sidki Soliman, Assistant of the President of the Republic for Foreign Affairs Dr. Mahmoud Fawzi, Minister of Foreign Affairs Mahmoud Riad and Ambassador the UAR to the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Mohammad Hamdi Abuzeid. I The first talks were held at the Kubeh Palace in Cairo on August 11th, 1967, from 11:52 am until 2:00 pm. Prior to that, two Presidents held an hour-long talk. At the beginning of our talks, President Nasser welcomed President Tito and members of the Yugoslav delegation and said that in our visit they see our desire to show solidarity in such difficult times for them in their troubles and problems.
    [Show full text]
  • MUNUC XXIX Cabinet of Egypt Background Guide
    THE CABINET OF EGYPT, 1954 MUNUC XXIX Cabinet Briefing LETTER FROM THE CHAIR Greetings Delegates! Welcome to the first cabinet meeting of our new government. In addition to preparing to usher in a new age of prosperity in Egypt, I am a fourth year at the University of Chicago, alternatively known as Hannah Brodheim. Originally from New York City, I am studying economics and computer science. I am also a USG for our college conference, ChoMUN. I have previously competed with the UChicago competitive Model UN team. I also help run Splash! Chicago, a group which organizes events where UChicago students teach their absurd passions to interested high school students. Egypt has not had an easy run of it lately. Outdated governance systems, and the lack of investment in the country under the British has left Egypt economically and politically in the dust. Finally, a new age is dawning, one where more youthful and more optimistic leadership has taken power. Your goals are not short term, and you do not intend to let Egypt evolve slowly. Each of you has your personal agenda and grudges; what solution is reached by the committee to each challenge ahead will determine the trajectory of Egypt for years to come. We will begin in 1954, before the cabinet has done anything but be formed. The following background guide is to help direct your research; do not limit yourself to the information contained within. Success in committee will require an understanding of the challenges Nasser’s Cabinet faces, and how the committee and your own resources may be harnessed to overcome them.
    [Show full text]
  • Box Folder Date Extent Presidential Correspondence 1969-1974 748
    Box Folder Date Extent Presidential Correspondence 1969-1974 748 AFGHANISTAN Mohammad Daoud [October-November 1973] ALGERIA Col Houari Boumediene October 1970-April 1973] ARGENTINA Pres Lanusse [October 1971-May 1973] AUSTRALIA Prime Minister Gorton Corres. [June 1969-April 1970] AUSTRALIA Prime Minister McMahon [May 1971-March 1973] AUSTRALIA: PM E. Gough [December 1972-August 1973] AUSTRIA CHANCELLOR: Kreisky, Bruno [June 1972] BAHRAIN Shaykh Isa bin Salmar Al-Khalita [December 1971] BANGLADESH Prime Minister Mujibur Rahman [February 1972-July 1974] 749 Belgium KING BAUDOUIN [June 27, 1974] President Banzer (Bolivia) [1971-1973] Brazil President Gen. Ernesto Geisel President of Brazil General Emilio Garrastazu Medici [1972-1973] BURMA General Ne Win Corres. [1971-1972] CAMBODIA Prince Sihanouk Corres. [1969-1974] Cambodia MATAK, SIRIK CORRES. [1970-1971] CAMBODIA Lon Nol, Prime Minister 1970 Box Folder Date Extent Presidential Correspondence 1969-1974 749 Cambodia: President Marshal Lon Nol 1971 750 CAMBODIA President, Marshal Lon Nol 1972 CANADA Trudeau corres. [1969-1973] CEYLON Prime Minister Senanayake Corres. [1970] 751 CHAD Pres. Francois Tombalbaye [April 1970-December 1972] CHILE Pres. Allende Corres. [December 8, 1971] REPUBLIC OF CHINA corres. Pres. Chaing Kai-shek November 1969-March 1973] COLOMBIA CARLOS LLERAS CORRES. Republic of Colombia Bogota, Dr. Misael Pastrana Borrero (President) CONGO (Kinshasa) President Mobutu Corres. COSTA RICA Trejos corres. Jose Figueres Ferrer (Pres) Costa Rica, San Jose DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Pres Joaquin Balaguer President of Ecuador Jose Maria Velasco Ibarra President of Ecuador Guillermo Antonio Rodriguez Lara EGYPT President Sadat ETHIOPIA Selassie corres. Box Folder Date Extent Presidential Correspondence 1969-1974 751 FRANCE P.M. Chaban-Delmas Corres.
    [Show full text]
  • Peevers, C. (2017) Altering International Law: Nasser, Bandung, and the Suez Crisis. In: Eslava, L., Fakhri, M
    Peevers, C. (2017) Altering international law: Nasser, Bandung, and the Suez crisis. In: Eslava, L., Fakhri, M. and Nesiah, V. (eds.) Bandung, Global History and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. ISBN 9781107123991 This is the author’s final accepted version. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/139155/ Deposited on: 17 May 2017 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 1 Altering International Law: Nasser, Bandung, and the Suez Crisis Charlotte Peevers “We believe in international law. But we will never submit. We shall show the world how a small country can stand in the face of great powers threatening with armed might.”1 The traditional narrative of the Suez Crisis begins on July 26, 1956, with Gamal Abdel Nasser’s announcement of the nationalization of the Universal Suez Canal Company; hits a crescendo with first Israeli, and then Anglo-French invasion of Egypt in late October 1956; and ends with an humiliating cease-fire and replacement with a United Nations Emergency Force in December 1956. The Suez Crisis now sits as something of a mythic monument to the folly of imperialist adventurism in the face of postwar decolonization and the United Nations Charter era. The orthodox memory of the Suez Crisis and its ideational legacy have been mythologized into a cautionary tale of using
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS LEADERSHIP in the SUEZ CRISIS of 1956 and ITS RAMIFICATIONS in WORLD AFFAIRS Matthew Alw Ker University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, History, Department of Department of History 11-2010 THE LOST ART OF INTERDEPENDENCY: UNITED NATIONS LEADERSHIP IN THE SUEZ CRISIS OF 1956 AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS IN WORLD AFFAIRS Matthew alW ker University of Nebraska - Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss Part of the History Commons Walker, Matthew, "THE LOST ART OF INTERDEPENDENCY: UNITED NATIONS LEADERSHIP IN THE SUEZ CRISIS OF 1956 AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS IN WORLD AFFAIRS" (2010). Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History. 33. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/historydiss/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, & Student Research, Department of History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE LOST ART OF INTERDEPENDENCY: UNITED NATIONS LEADERSHIP IN THE SUEZ CRISIS OF 1956 AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS IN WORLD AFFAIRS By Matthew Walker A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: History Under the Supervision of Professor Thomas Borstelmann Lincoln, Nebraska December, 2010 THE LOST ART OF INTERDEPENDENCY: UNITED NATIONS LEADERSHIP IN THE SUEZ CRISIS OF 1956 AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS IN WORLD AFFAIRS Matthew Walker, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2010 Advisor: Thomas Borstelmann The following study examines the relationship between competing national interests and the implementation of multilateral diplomacy as characterized by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Missing the Consequences Misperceptions of the 1967 Six-Day Israeli-Arab War
    University of Central Florida STARS HIM 1990-2015 2011 Missing the consequences misperceptions of the 1967 six-day israeli-arab war Jonathan Miniello University of Central Florida Part of the Psychology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIM 1990-2015 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Miniello, Jonathan, "Missing the consequences misperceptions of the 1967 six-day israeli-arab war" (2011). HIM 1990-2015. 1165. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/1165 MISSING THE CONSEQUENCES: MISPERCEPTIONS OF THE 1967 SIX- DAY ISRAELI-ARAB WAR. by JONATHAN SAMUELE MINIELLO A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Psychology in the College of Sciences and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2011 Thesis Chair: Dr. Houghton 1 © 2011 Jonathan. S. Miniello 2 Abstract In recent times, the issues surrounding the “67 borders” have become part of the public debate. In recent speeches, President Obama has suggested that Israel should return to pre-1967 borders with “land-swaps” in exchange for some form of peace with the Palestinians living within current Israeli territory. The validity of Obama’s suggestion has been questioned by both members of the political left and right and in the opinion of this author, with considerable merit.
    [Show full text]
  • Nael M. Shama Phd Thesis
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by St Andrews Research Repository THE FOREIGN POLICY OF EGYPT UNDER MUBARAK: THE PRIMACY OF REGIME SECURITY Nael M. Shama A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2008 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/569 This item is protected by original copyright The Foreign Policy of Egypt under Mubarak: The Primacy of Regime Security (A Thesis Submitted for the Award of the Degree of Doctorate of Philosophy) Nael M. Shama School of International Relations University of St. Andrews February 2008 1 I, Nael Shama, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 105000 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. Date: signature of candidate ……… I was admitted as a research student in September 2003 and as a candidate for the degree of PhD in September 2004; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2003 and 2007. date signature of candidate ……… I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of …………..in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt and the Soviet Union, 1953-1970
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1986 Egypt and the Soviet Union, 1953-1970 John W. Copp Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the African Studies Commons, History Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Copp, John W., "Egypt and the Soviet Union, 1953-1970" (1986). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3797. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5681 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE thesis of John w. Copp for the Master of Arts in History presented April 7, 1986. Title: Egypt and the Soviet Union, 1953-1970 APPROVED BY THE MEMBERS OF THE~IS COMMITTEE -------- --------- The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze in detail the many aspects of the Soviet-Egyptian friendship as it developed from 1953 to 1970. The relationship between the two is extremely important because it provides insight into the roles of both Egypt aand the Soviet Union in both the history of the Middle East and in world politics. The period from 1953 to 1970 is key in understanding the relationship between the two states because it is the period of the genesis of the relationship and a period in which both nations went through marked changes in both internal policy and their external relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East - Middle East 1967 (See List of Items Appendix No
    UN Secretariat Item Scan - Barcode - Record Title Page 46 Date 22/05/2006 Time 4:37:30 PM S-0865-0002-27-00001 Expanded Number S-0865-0002-27-00001 Title items-in-Peace-keeping operations - Middle East - Middle East 1967 (see list of items appendix No. 3) Dafe Created 22/05/1967 Record Type Archival Item Container s-0865-0002: Peace-Keeping Operations Files of the Secretary-General: U Thant - Middle East Print Name of Person Submit Image Signature of Person Submit End of Report United Nations - ARMS DatesefUNARMSDB -A, Selected Confidential Papers on The Middle East 1967 1) Meeting - 14 March ^96s 7 - Present:!! Thant, Ambassador Goldberg, Ralph J. Bunche 2) Meeting - 15 March I - Present! U Thant, Ambassador Goldberg Ralph J. Bunche 3) Meeting - 22 March 1967 - Present- SG, Senator Clark, Pell, Mundt, Carlson, Fulbright, Sparkman, Church, Gore, Cooper, •£ase, McCarthy, Marcy, Mr. Paul Hoffman, R. J. Bunche £ 1/..U--/V'-vO 4) 'Revised version of Carl Marcy's resume of meebing - 22 March 1967 United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations ( v<J^t- *-v^_ 1 '5) Meeting - 22 May 1967 - Present: SG Ambassador Goldberg, x) Ambassador Pedersen, Ralph Lanche 6) Meeting - 20 June 1967 - Present- SG, Sec. of State Dean Rusk Ambassador Goldberg, Ralph Bunche 7) Meeting - 21 June 1967 - Present: Mr. M. Couve de Murville Ambassador Seydoux Meeting - 22 June 1967 - Present SG, Ambassador Goldberg Meeting - 27 June 1967 - Present SG, Dean Rusk Meeting - 4 July 1967 - Present: SG, Dr. Mahmoud Fawzi, Mr. Mahmoud Riad, Ralph Bunche Meeting - 4 July 19&7 - Present: SG, Abba Eban, Ambassador Gideon Rafael, Ambassador Shabtai Rosenne, Ralph Bunche Meeting - 5 July 1967 - Present: SG, Ambassador Qoldberg, Ralph Bunche Meeting - 7 July 1967 - Present:Ambassador Tomeh of Syria, SG Meeting - 8 July 1967 - Present: SG, Arthur Goldberg, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • [ 1956 ] Appendices
    APPENDIX I ROSTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS (As of 31 March 1956) TOTAL AREA ESTIMATED POPULATION DATE OF U.N. COUNTRY (square kilometres) Date Total MEMBERSHIP (in thousands) Afghanistan 650,000 1 July 1956 12,000 19 Nov. 1946 Albania 28,748 1 July 1955 1,394 14 Dec. 1955 Argentina 2,778,412 1 July 1956 19,470 24 Oct. 1945 Australia 7,704,159 30 Sep. 1956 9,479 1 Nov. 1945 Austria 83,849 31 Dec. 1955 6,976 14 Dec. 1955 Belgium 30,507 31 Dec. 1955 8,896 27 Dec. 1945 Bolivia 1,098,581 5 Sep. 1956 3,235 14 Nov. 1945 Brazil 8,513,844 1 Jan. 1957 60,553 24 Oct. 1945 Bulgaria 111,493 1 Dec. 1956 7,629 14 Dec. 1955 Burma 677,950 1 July 1956 19,856 19 Apr. 1948 Byelorussian SSR 207,600 1 Apr. 1956 8,000 24 Oct. 1945 Cambodia 175,000 1 July 1955 4,358 14 Dec. 1955 Canada 9,960,547 1 Jan. 1957 16,344 9 Nov. 1945 Ceylon 65,610 15 June 1956 8,783 14 Dec. 1955 Chile 741,767 31 Aug. 1956 6,972 24 Oct. 1945 China 9,736,288 1 July 1948 463,493 24 Oct. 1945 Colombia 1,138,355 5 July 1956 12,939 5 Nov. 1945 Costa Rica 50,900 31 Dec. 1956 1,013 2 Nov. 1945 Cuba 114,524 28 Jan. 1953 5,829 24 Oct. 1945 Czechoslovakia 127,819 1 July 1956 13,224 24 Oct. 1945 Denmark 42,936 1 July 1955 4,439 24 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • A Political Economy of Egyptian Foreign Policy: State, Ideology, and Modernisation Since 1970
    London School of Economics A Political Economy of Egyptian Foreign Policy: State, Ideology, and Modernisation since 1970 Yasser Mohamed Elwy MOHAMED MAHMOUD A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, April 2009. UMI Number: U615702 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615702 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 F iz-vssvv A Political Economy o f Egyptian Foreien Policy: State. Ideology and Modernisation since 1970 Yasser M. Elwv Declaration I certify that this thesis, presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science, is solely my own work. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party.
    [Show full text]