National Dog Theft Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National Dog Theft Survey NATIONAL DOG THEFT SURVEY Results Summary August 2015 www.projectpaws.org.au [email protected] ABN 75 193 960 564 www.facebook.com/projectpawsaus An Incorporated Not-for-profit Association About Project P.A.W.S Project P.A.W.S is an incorporated not-for-profit animal welfare organisation based in Brisbane, Queens- land Australia. The organisation was established in 2015 with a focus on public policy, advocacy, welfare and safety pertaining to both companion and non-companion animals as sentient beings. Project P.A.W.S maintains a social media presence through its Facebook page which is the primary tool in which the or- ganisation interacts with the public and its supporters. It also uses other social media platforms to engage with government, business and the community. The survey and this report was prepared by Dr. Stephen Thornton, social economist, with the assistance of psychologist Samantha King. Contact details Facebook: www.facebook.com/projectpawsaus Website: www.projectpaws.org.au Email: [email protected] ABN: 75 193 960 564 Disclaimer This report has been prepared for the purposes of providing the results of a survey conducted by Project P.A.W.S and is distributed for general information purposes only. The report in no way is produced to provide specific ad- vice to any individual or Corporation as all circumstances are different and may require different solutions. Project P.A.W.S accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage suffered howsoever arising to any person or Cor- poration who may use or rely on this report in contravention of the terms of this clause. Project P.A.W.S supports facebook.com/RSPCAQueensland f a c e b o o k . c o m / O s c a r s L a w A U S facebook.com/AnimalsAustralia facebook.com/BarristersAnimalWelfarePanel Note: these organisations were not Our supporters involved in formulating the survey or in the preparation of this report facebook.com/IgniteDigitalMarketing Summary Australia has one of the highest rates of dog ownership in the world. There is no doubt Australians love their dogs. Recent research shows that 38 per cent of the population live in a household with a canine with Tasmania having the highest dog ownership (44%) followed by WA (42%), SA (41%), Queensland (39%), Victoria (38%) and NSW (including the ACT) (35%)1. Not surprisingly, most dog owners view their pet as a close member of the family and the thought of having their dog stolen is of great concern. Dog theft is one of those issues that from time to time make a headline in the local news, mostly when it is a good news story when a stolen dog has been found and returned to its owner. However dog theft often goes unreported by owners who do not understand the theft of their dog is a crime. Even when they do report it, too many times authorities do not take it seriously. Dog theft occurs for many reasons. The main reasons are thought to be to on-sell and to breed from. In regard to on-selling, the right dog, often a pure bred, can fetch many hundreds of dollars and in some cases over $1000. Dog thieves have been known to use trade and sell websites to on-sell a dog. In terms of breeding, pure bred dogs that are not desexed are particular targets however mixed breed dogs can be profitable to breed from too as often very young puppies can be passed off as pure bred to unsuspecting and novice buyers. Dogs may also be stolen for dog fighting. Unlike in the United States where authorities and the ASPCA (our RSPCA equivalent) make regular and often large scale dog fighting ring busts, Australia does not have the same culture of this so called “sport”. There have been very few confirmed reports of organised dog fighting events in this country. Nevertheless, dog fighting is likely to occur in small numbers which is still to be uncovered. Like the recent revelations in the greyhound industry in regard to live baiting, the “whispers” of this unlawful activity occurring may sometimes have substance. Finally, while not “active” dog theft, people who find a dog that may have escaped the yard and do not to make a reasonable attempt to find the owner also engage in a form of dog theft. People have an obligation to use their best efforts to find the lawful owner of a found dog e.g. taking the dog to a vet to check for a microchip, contacting the pound, and putting up posters / door knocking the local area. This Results Summary provides the findings of an online survey conducted from October 2013 to January 2014 to better understand the perceptions and incidence of dog theft in Australia and what precautions dog owners take to reduce the risk of their much loved pet being stolen. The survey included a focus on the financial and psychological impacts of dog theft on individuals as well the impacts on the economy in regard to lost productivity at work. The results of the survey have 1 Roy Morgan Research (2015) “Doggone it: Pet ownership in Australia” Available http://www.roymorgan.com/findings/6272-pet-ownership-in-australia-2015 Accessed 5 June 2015 National Dog Theft Survey August 2015 www.projectpaws.org.au 1 important implications for policy and law makers. In the UK, for example, the issue of dog theft as a significant criminal activity has been raised by MPs and the Parliamentary Group for Animal Welfare who have called for more action to be taken to reduce the incidence of pet theft2. 1,219 dog owners from all states and territories of Australia completed the survey via social media, with nearly 80 per cent residing in Queensland due to it being promoted on the Queenslanders Against Dog Theft & Fighting Rings (QADTFR) Facebook page, which at the time of the survey had approximately 10,000 “likes”. Survey participants were largely recruited through this page where a SurveyMonkey link was posted as well as on the Facebook pages of other like-minded animal welfare organisations e.g. Oscar’s Law in Victoria. The methodology is detailed in Appendix A. While the survey results should be considered with some caution given the “snowball” sampling method used (non random sampling) and the use of a dedicated dog theft Facebook page as the primary survey recruitment tool, both of which are likely to introduce a degree of bias, they nevertheless reveal some interesting findings which may form the basis for further research into particular aspects of dog ownership and dog theft. These will be of use to local councils in regard to things like microchipping, council registration and the securing of yard practices and for state governments in regard to criminal penalties for dog theft and the response of police services when the suspected theft of a dog is reported. Key Results The responses from survey respondents show that: 85 per cent of dog owners consider their dog/s to be as close to them as the people they love most in their life. More people owned two dogs (45.4%) than just the one dog (43.7%). The 10 most popular breeds were the Staffordshire Bull Terrier (347), American Staffordshire Terrier (118), Labrador Retriever (85), Border Collie (74), Maltese (73), German Shepherd Dog (71), Australian Cattle Dog (67), Bull Terrier (63), Australian Kelpie (55), Rottweiler (55). 89.8 per cent of dogs were microchipped; 80.6 per cent were desexed; 83.6 per cent were registered with the local council however only 59.1 per cent of dogs wore the council identification tag. 64.1 per cent wore a tag on the dog collar with a current phone number. 2 BBC News (2013) “Dog theft needs government action, says parliamentary group” 22 December 2013. Accessed 9 May 2015. Available http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-25455415 National Dog Theft Survey August 2015 www.projectpaws.org.au 2 One in 12 dog owners have had a dog suspected stolen/kept by someone with 60 owners experiencing evidence of forced entry and 33 witnessing their dog being taken. Four of every ten owners reported their suspected stolen dog to police. 18 per cent found police to be helpful and took the report seriously however 50 per cent of reports were only taken somewhat seriously and/or the police were only somewhat helpful. Almost one-third of respondents (32%) reported that police were not interested and there was nothing they could do. The vast majority of owners (98.1%) reported that they felt quite/very distressed when their dog was suspected stolen. Eight of every 10 people (83.4%) reported that their concentration at work was extremely/very affected when their dog was suspected stolen, likely resulting in poorer work performance and lower productivity. Around two-thirds of dog owners spent extra money securing their yard against dog theft. 101 owners had spent money finding their dog ranging from $20 to many thousands of dollars with one owner spending an estimated $10,000 to find their dog. 128 dog owners took between 4 hours to over three days off work to find their suspected stolen dog. Just under half of 1173 respondents thought that police took dog theft seriously or at least somewhat seriously (45.1%) while the proportion of respondents that believed government and the courts took the issue seriously was significantly lower being 18.6 per cent and 24.3 per cent respectively. 95 per cent of dog owners believe it is important for government and police to use resources to reduce the incidence of dog theft.
Recommended publications
  • Barmaryee Road Shared Path Pavex Project Case Study
    Project Barmaryee Road Shared Path Project Information The perfect partnership that paved the way for Project: Barmaryee Road Shared Path PaveX™ Location: Yeppoon, QLD Renowned for its beaches, tropical climate, and 27 surrounding bay islands including Great Keppel, Yeppoon 2.2 km Shared Path: is a coastal town on the Capricorn Coast, located within the Project 2.5m W x 100mm D Scope: Driveways: Shire of Livingstone, Queensland. Blessed with a string of 150mm Depth beaches, shallow coves and low-lying wetlands, Yeppoon is a popular destination for tourists, young families and Livingstone Shire Council: Council retirees looking to soak up the Central Queensland sun. Published in August 2018, the Livingstone Shire Council’s Active Livingstone Strategy Concrete Tandy Concrete identified a strong desire among locals to connect the Pineapple Coast Rail Trail with Supplier: the Yeppoon Foreshore. As result, the Livingstone Shire Council committed resources to developing additional linkages to the rail trail, further enhancing the Concrete Mix N32/20 community’s connectivity. Design: Fibercon MPP Fibres ICT Distributor: Concreters Warehouse Finish July 2020 Date: Product Danley™ PaveX™ In December 2019, the Livingstone Shire Council partnered with Tandy Concrete, Expanda™ Fibercon and ICT Concreters Warehouse to design and construct a vital 2.2km stretch Used: 100mm Kit of 2.5m wide shared bikeway along Barmaryee Road. The goal? To provide a safe and accessible shared-use pavement that connects recreational walkers, cyclists and mobility-impaired locals with Yeppoon‘s newly constructed Barmaryee Sportsground facilities. The challenge? CORROSION! If there is one problem with stunning beaches and low-lying wetlands, it is the damage that corrosion can cause to the concrete joints in surrounding pavements, which results in spalling and potential tripping hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • Capricorn Coast Regional Council & Rockhampton Regional Council
    Capricorn Coast Regional Council & Rockhampton Regional Council a Partnership Approach for Sound Regional Governance Unity and strength with community of interest representation De-amalgamation Submission to the Queensland Boundary Commissioner August 2012 Contents CCIM Message 2 Preface . 3 Response to Boundary Commission Questions 6 Bernard Salt - A Precis 11 Capricorn Coast - A Regional Growth Centre . .13 Financial Viability Analysis 14 Livingstone/Capricorn Coast Regional Council Profile in the Regional Context 19 Economic Development 21 Optimum Service Delivery 30 Optimum Governance Model 35 Communities of Interest 37 Amalgamation Impacts on Community Services . .44 Capricorn Coast Independence Movement Environmental Management 47 PO Box 309 Yeppoon Qld 4703 Contact: Paul Lancaster, Chairman Appendices . .54 Phone: 07 4939 7840 Email: [email protected] Contact: Cr Bill Ludwig Phone: 0428 791 792 Email: [email protected] 1 CCIM Message The two primary objectives that will be achieved by restoring an independent Capricorn Coast Regional Council are as follows. The first is to restore the fundamental and basic democratic rights of every community to make their own decisions about determining their future, and setting their own priorities while considering the broader Regional context. The second, and equally important, is delivering a better model of Local Government to provide for sound decision making, while empowering our business, industry and primary producers with a better focussed and a more inclusive ‘grassroots’ foundation from which to promote and enhance regional economic growth and prosperity. These combined objectives will ensure the proposed Capricorn Coast Regional Council area can realise and optimise its full potential in partnership with the greater Rockhampton area.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Meeting Notice & Agenda 15
    COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE & AGENDA 15 December 2020 49 Stockyard Street Cunnamulla Qld 4490 www.paroo.qld.gov.au Agenda General Meeting of Council Notice is hereby given that the Ordinary Meeting of Council is to be held on Tuesday, 15th December 2020 at the Cunnamulla Shire Hall, Jane Street Cunnamulla, commencing at 9.00am 1 OPENING OF MEETING 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRADITIONAL OWNERS 3 ATTENDANCES AND APOLOGIES 4 MOTION OF SYMPATHY • Mr Peter Doyle • Ms Grace Brown • Pat Cooney 5 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Recommendation: That Council adopt the minutes of the General Meeting of Council held Tuesday, 17th November 2020 as a true and correct record of that meeting. 6 DECLARATION OF INTEREST BEING 6.1 Material Personal Interest 6.2 Conflict Of Interest 7 MAYOR 1 7.1 Mayor’s Report 8 OFFICER REPORTS 8.1 DIRECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE 8.1.1 Operations Report 3 8.1.2 Rubbish Truck Replacement Report 12 8.2 DIRECTOR COMMUNITY SUPPORT AND ENGAGEMENT 8.2.1 Community Services Report 15 8.2.2 Library Services Report 20 8.2.3 Tourism Report 23 8.2.4 Local Laws Report 29 8.2.5 Rural Lands and Compliance Report 32 8.2.6 Community Support – Strides Blue Tree 34 10.30 First 5 Forever Video Competition Winners announced – Winners to attend to receive awards Morning Tea 8.3 CHIEF FINANCE OFFICER 8.3.1 Finance Report 36 8.4 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 8.4.1 Action Item Register 52 8.4.2 Office of the Chief Executive Officer’s Report 57 8.4.3 Grants Report 63 8.4.4 Project Management Report 66 8.4.5 Policy Report 69 9 LATE REPORTS 10 CLOSED SESSION - CONFIDENTIAL 11 CORRESPONDENCE 11.1 Special Gazetted Public Holiday 132 11.2 2021 QOGM Paroo 141 11.3 MDA Change of Name Consultation 143 12 CLOSURE OF MEETING 155 Ms Cassie White Chief Executive Officer 09th December 2020 General Council Meeting Notice & Agenda 15 December 2020 7.1 Mayor’s Report Council Meeting: 15 December 2020 Department: Office of the Mayor Author: Suzette Beresford, Mayor Purpose The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the meetings and teleconferences that Mayor Beresford has attended.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Decision in the Coming Weeks
    PROOF ISSN 1322-0330 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Hansard Home Page: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/hansard/ E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (07) 3406 7314 Fax: (07) 3210 0182 Subject FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY-SECOND PARLIAMENT Page Wednesday, 18 April 2007 PRIVILEGE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1269 Alleged Intimidation of Member .......................................................................................................................................... 1269 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 20 March 2007, from Mr M O’Connor of Gabriel Ruddy & Garrett solicitors to the Clerk of the Parliament relating to a tabled paper. ........................................................................................... 1269 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 20 March 2007, from the Clerk of the Parliament to Mr M O’Connor of Gabriel Ruddy & Garrett solicitors relating to a tabled paper. ................................................................................ 1269 Tabled paper: Letter, dated 26 March 2007, from Mr M O’Connor of Gabriel Ruddy & Garrett solicitors to the Clerk of the Parliament relating to a tabled paper. ....................................................................................... 1269 PETITIONS ....................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda CQHHS Consultative Forum
    Agenda CQHHS Consultative Forum 9.00 am – 11.00 am Chairperson Shareen McMillan Date and Time Thursday, 7 February 2019 Executive Board Room Samantha Lynam Venue Secretariat Rockhampton Hospital A/Employee Relations Support Officer Shareen McMillan, Executive Director Workforce James Kelaher, A/Chief Finance Officer Wendy Hoey, Executive Director Rockhampton Hospital Sue Foyle, A/Executive Director Nursing and Midwifery, Quality and Safety Sandy Munro, A/Executive Director Gladstone and Banana Kieran Kinsella, Executive Director Rural and District Wide Services Kerrie-Anne Frakes, Executive Director Strategy, Transformation and Allied Health Joanne Chapman, A/Manager Human Resources Services Belinda Driscoll, A/Manager Occupational Health and Safety Grant Burton, QLD Nurses and Midwife Union Organiser Ruth McFarlane, Together Union Representative Allison Finley-Bissett, Lead Organiser Together Union Ashleigh Saunders, Together Union Representative Mark Pattel, Australian Medical Association QLD Representative Graham Brewitt, Regional Organiser United Voice Steve Williamson, Health Service Chief Executive Sharyn O’Mahoney, A/Manager Workforce Culture & Performance Apologies Billy Bijoux, Electrical Trades Union Craig Sell, Organiser Australian Worker’s Union Campbell Murfin, Together Union Representative Guests Deb Hirning, James Jenkins, Juleen Worthington Presentations Nil Teleconference 1300 590 084 Dial code: 400786 Pin 5776# (QH internal) Videoconference Dial 400786 Pin 5776# (QH internal) CQ Health acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the land, and pays respect to Elders past, present and future. 1. Living our Values 1.1. Care: We are attentive to individual needs and circumstances 1.2. Integrity: We are consistently true, act diligently and lead by example 1.3. Respect: We will behave with courtesy, dignity and fairness in all we do 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Queensland Coal Project Chapter 24 – References Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement
    Central Queensland Coal Project Chapter 24 – References Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement Central Queensland Coal Project Chapter 24 - References 20 December 2018 CDM Smith Australia Pty Ltd ABN 88 152 082 936 Level 4, 51 Alfred Street Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 Tel: +61 7 3828 6900 Fax: +61 7 3828 6999 Table of Contents 24 References ........................................................................................................................................ 24-2 24.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 24-2 24.2 Project Need and Alternatives ...................................................................................................... 24-3 24.3 Description of the Project ............................................................................................................... 24-3 24.4 Climate ..................................................................................................................................................... 24-4 24.5 Land .......................................................................................................................................................... 24-5 24.6 Traffic and Transport ........................................................................................................................ 24-9 24.7 Waste Management ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022
    DRAFT V20 2019 Queensland Bushfires State Recovery Plan 2019-2022 Working to recover, rebuild and reconnect more resilient Queensland communities following the 2019 Queensland Bushfires August 2020 to come Document details Interpreter Security classification Public The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have Date of review of security classification August 2020 difficulty in understanding this report, you can access the Translating and Interpreting Authority Queensland Reconstruction Authority Services via www.qld.gov.au/languages or by phoning 13 14 50. Document status Final Disclaimer Version 1.0 While every care has been taken in preparing this publication, the State of Queensland accepts no QRA reference QRATF/20/4207 responsibility for decisions or actions taken as a result of any data, information, statement or advice, expressed or implied, contained within. ISSN 978-0-9873118-4-9 To the best of our knowledge, the content was correct at the time of publishing. Copyright Copies This publication is protected by the Copyright Act 1968. © The State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority), August 2020. Copies of this publication are available on our website at: https://www.qra.qld.gov.au/fitzroy Further copies are available upon request to: Licence Queensland Reconstruction Authority This work is licensed by State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority) under a Creative PO Box 15428 Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International licence. City East QLD 4002 To view a copy of this licence, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Phone (07) 3008 7200 In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this annual report, as long as you attribute [email protected] the work to the State of Queensland (Queensland Reconstruction Authority).
    [Show full text]
  • Livingstone Shire Council the Fruits of Infrastructure
    Livingstone Shire Council The fruits of infrastructure The story of Livingston Shire spans endless natural surroundings. The sol- nearly 140 years having been estab- id economy we speak of is driven by lished in 1879 with a population of agriculture, mining, retail and govern- 5023. Now, this population has grown ance. This economy is particularly pro- to 37,000 and continues to attract pelled tourism – no doubt a result of more and more residents and visitors the natural, cultural and entertain- with its combination of a solid eco- ment attractions it boasts. Spanning nomic growth, a laid back lifestyle and over 11,776km2, the scenic district PB Business View Oceania - October/November 2017 AT A GLANCE WHO: Livingstone Shire Council WHAT: The Livingstone Shire Council was established after de-amalgamation on 1 January 2014 and looks after approximately 11,776 square kilometres and has a population of more than 37,000 residents. WHERE: Yeppoon QLD, 4703 WEBSITE: livingstone.qld.gov.au have, and will, help the town to contin- ue to flourish. But, before we go into all of that, it’s important to put some con- text around the development work. In 2008, the Shire of Livingstone merged with three of its neighbours from with- in the Capricorna region of Queens- land to form the Rockhampton Region. Namely, the City of Rockhampton, the Shire of Mount Morgan and the Shire of Fitzroy. In 2014, the Shire of Living- stone was de-amalgamated, a result Livingstone Shire Council of a proposal to do so in 2012, and a subsequent vote by the area’s citizens The fruits of infrastructure in the following year.
    [Show full text]
  • National Packing Covenant
    Sustainable Industries Sustainable National Packaging Industries Covenant Queensland achievements 2000 - 2005 The National Packaging Covenant (EnviroCom) The National Packaging Covenant (the The National Environmental Covenant) was launched in August Protection Measure (NEPM) 1999 with the aim of providing more A key regulatory framework called the effective management of used National Environmental Protection packaging materials based on the Measure supports the voluntary principles of shared responsibility Covenant. Designed as a tool to and product stewardship. encourage compliance throughout The Covenant is a voluntary the packaging chain, the NEPM helps agreement between the packaging ensure that signatories meet their supply chain and government. Covenant obligations via action plans Covenant signatories agree to share and reports. responsibility for reducing the Since 2000, more than 600 environmental impacts of packaging. businesses from a broad range of Under the Covenant, raw material industries have been identified as suppliers, designers, manufacturers, meeting the brand owner users, retailers and consumers, as requirements of the NEPM. well as government and collection Companies not entitled to exemption agencies, all accept responsibility for under the NEPM were required to their activities. either become signatories to the The Covenant’s key objectives for the Covenant or to meet the more first five years were to: rigorous regulatory requirements of the NEPM. • Establish a framework, based on the principle of shared With assistance from the responsibility, for the effective Environmental Protection Agency lifecycle management of (EPA), many of these businesses packaging and paper products _ elected to sign the Covenant and are including their recovery and now benefiting from the outcomes utilisation the voluntary process delivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Capricorn Destination Tourism Plan
    CAPRICORN DESTINATION TOURISM PLAN Final Report March 2014 .. Executive Summary Key Markets Tier One Tourism is both a major economic activity and • Connectors in Regional Queensland and lifestyle driver for the Capricorn region. The Brisbane (400km radius of the Region) visitor economy injects $525 million of direct Tier Two expenditure into the destination each year, • Social Fun-seekers and Active Explorers in which, in turn, supports over 5,600 jobs (direct Sydney and Melbourne and indirect). Visitor expenditure also supports a • New Zealand, United Kingdom and North range of infrastructure including restaurants, America, promoted as Southern Great airports and cultural facilities, which actively Barrier Reef contribute to developing liveable communities. Tier Three To help achieve Central Queensland’s 2020 • Europe, promoted as Southern Great target aspiration of $1.16 billion, Capricorn will Barrier Reef have to contribute approximately $787 million (68% of the Central Queensland 2020 target1) New and Developing towards the 2020 target. In order to do this, key • China, promoted as Southern Great market segments need to be harnessed to drive Barrier Reef growth in the region. To grow and prosper as a destination and to Recognising this, the following Capricorn achieve its $787M aspiration for 2020 (an extra Destination Tourism Plan has been prepared to $265M), it is recommended that the following provide the definitive direction for tourism and markets be considered as key target areas for events in the Capricorn Region towards 2020, growth of Capricorn’s visitor economy: highlighting the resources required to achieve • Visiting Friends and Relatives (VFR) the 2020 target and create a sustainable and competitive tourism and events destination.
    [Show full text]
  • ROTARY VTT to Australia, District 9570 JULY - AUGUST 2019
    ROTARY VTT to Australia, District 9570 JULY - AUGUST 2019 Version 1.6 Updated 15/7/19 What is the VTT? Vocational training teams (VTT) are groups of professionals who travel abroad either to teach local professionals about a particular field or to learn more about their own. Teams can be funded by Rotary district grants and global grants. VTTs build on the Foundation’s long-standing commitment to vocational training. Activities vary from one team to the next but may include training medical professionals on cardiac surgery and care, sharing best practices on early childhood education, or explaining new irrigation techniques to farmers. A successful VTT increases the capacity of the host community to solve problems and improve the quality of life. Activities support The Rotary Foundation’s mission to promote goodwill and peace, improve health, support education, and alleviate poverty. The VTT must be sponsored by Rotary clubs or districts from two countries. In September and October 2017, District 9570 supported a VTT team of five to travel to the UK to District 1180. The focus of the team was inclusion and education of students with disabilities. The team consisted of five educators: Team Leader Leisa Neaton (Rotarian and then Principal of Frenchville State School), and team members Lyle Walker (then Principal, Parkhurst State School), Karin Tanzer (Head of Curriculum, Allenstown State School), Delia Watson (Physiotherapist, who worked across a number of schools in the CQ area at the time), and Shelley Slade, (then Head of Special Education, Gladstone State High School). The team worked closely in negotiation with the Host District in the UK to design the VTT program.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Counselling Guide 2021 Pact Counselling Guide PACT Counselling Guide .2 2021 Pact Counselling Guide Contents
    2021 Counselling Guide 2021 Pact Counselling Guide PACT Counselling Guide .2 2021 Pact Counselling Guide Contents Brisbane South West Queensland Central West Queensland Brisbane - Inner City Shire of Balonne Barcaldine Region 10 Brisbane - North 28 Shire of Bullo 32 Shire of Barcoo Brisbane - East Maranoa Region Shire of Boulia Brisbane - South Shire of Murweh Shire of Diamantina Brisbane - West Shire of Quilpie Longreach Region Shire of Paroo South East Queensland North Queensland - Other Wide Bay - Burnett Whitsunday Region 17 Scenic Rim Region Bundaberg Region 35 Mackay Region Lockyer Valley Region 28 Fraser Coast Region City of Townsville Somerset Region Gympie Region Ipswich City South Burnett Region Moreton Bay Region Gulf Country Region Logan City City of Mount Isa Redland City Central Queensland 37 Charters Towers Region Sunshine Coast Region Shire of Burdekin City of Gold Coast Central Highlands Region 30 Gladstone Region Shire of Hinchinbrook Rockhampton Region Shire of Cloncurry Shire of Livingstone Palm Island Darling Downs Goondiwindi Region Stanthorpe Region 26 Far North Queensland Toowoomba Region Cairns Region 40 Cassowary Coast Region Tablelands Region Shire of Torres Shire of Carpentaria PACT Counselling Guide .3 2021 Pact Counselling Guide Therapy, counselling or psychotherapy - different names with generally the same purpose; having a trained professional Counselling help someone deal with the trauma they experienced, move beyond the past and be ready to start building a new future. For you, the person being helped is likely your child who has been the victim of, or witness to, a crime. There are many misunderstandings about what counselling actually is and there are lots of stereotypes about what’s involved.
    [Show full text]