NICOLAIE TITULESCU – a Prominent Romanian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

NICOLAIE TITULESCU – a prominent Romanian 4 MARCH 1882 – 17 MARCH 1941 Student: Cătălan Carla ”Traian Vuia” Technical College, Oradea, Romania NICOLAE TITULESCU (ROMANIAN PRONUNCIATION: [NIKOˈLA.E TITUˈLESKU]; WAS A ROMANIAN DIPLOMAT, AT VARIOUS TIMES GOVERNMENT MINISTER, FINANCE AND FOREIGN MINISTER, AND FOR TWO TERMS PRESIDENT OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS (1930–32). Early years • Nicolae Titulescu was born in Craiova, the son of a solicitor. He grew up at his father's estate in Titulești, a commune in Romania that was later named after him. Upon graduating with honours in 1900 from the Carol I High School in Craiova, Titulescu studied law in Paris, obtaining his doctorate with the thesis Essai sur une théorie des droits éventuels. In 1905, Titulescu returned to Romania as a professor of law at the University of Iași, and in 1907 he moved to Bucharest. Political career • Beginning in 1921, Titulescu functioned as the permanent representative of Romania to the League of Nations in Geneva. He was chosen twice (in 1930 and 1931) to be the president of that organization. • Following the Romanian elections of 1912, he became a parliamentarian with the Conservative-Democrat Party led by Take Ionescu, and five years later he became a member of the government of Ion I. C. Brătianu as Minister of Finance. Political career • In the summer of 1918, together with other prominent Romanians (Take Ionescu, Octavian Goga, Traian Vuia, Constantin Mille), Titulescu formed, in Paris, the National Romanian Committee, with the purpose of promoting in international public opinion the right of the Romanian people to national unity, the committee being officially recognised as the plenipotentiary de facto organ of the Romanian nation. Political career • Beginning in 1921, Titulescu functioned as the permanent representative of Romania to the League of Nations in Geneva. He was chosen twice (in 1930 and 1931) to be the president of that organization. In this capacity, he fought for the preservation of stable borders through the maintenance of peace, for good relations between both large and small neighboring states, for the respect of the sovereignty and equality of all nations in the international community, for collective security, and the prevention of aggression. Thanks for atenttion!.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

ASOCIATII LOCATARI SECTOR 1 Asociatia Adresa A.L. BD. DUCA NR. 17 BD. GH. D. DUCA Ing Nr. 17 A.L. BL. 7 CALEA GRIVITEI Nr. 222 A.L
ASOCIATII LOCATARI SECTOR 1 Asociatia Adresa A.L. BD. DUCA NR. 17 BD. GH. D. DUCA ing nr. 17 A.L. BL. 7 CALEA GRIVITEI nr. 222 A.L. BL. 2B CALEA GRIVITEI nr. 152 A.L. BL. C SC. A,C,D CALEA GRIVITEI nr. 238 A.L. VILA NR. 8 STR. HRISOVULUI nr. 28 A.L. BL. P CALEA GRIVITEI nr. 401 A.L. BL. 25 B STR. STIRBEI VODA nr. 95 A.L. BL. A 6 STR. BUZESTI nr. 61 A.L. BL. 10 D2 CALEA PLEVNEI nr. 94 A.L. BL. 6 SC. A,B,C CALEA GRIVITEI nr. 224 A.L. BL. 1,2,3 AL. C-TIN SANDU ALDEA nr. 2-4-6 A.L. BL. 5 BD. DINICU GOLESCU nr. 39 A.L. BL. 46A STR. SERDARULUI nr. 7 A.L. BL. 7 CALEA GRIVITEI nr. 222 A.L. BL. 6 SC. A,B,C CALEA GRIVITEI nr. 224 A.L. BL. A7 SOS. NICOLAE TITULESCU nr. 1 A.L. BD. ION MIHALACHE 66 BD. ION MIHALACHE nr. 66 A.L. BL. 1 STR. TURDA nr. 129 A.L. BL. 10A1 BD. 1 MAI nr. 117 A.L. BL. 16A BD. 1 MAI nr. 47 A.L. BL.G6 STR. CPT. AV. ALEXANDRU SERBANESCU nr. 4-6 A.L. BL. 16C STR. CPT. AV. ALEXANDRU SERBANESCU nr. 16 A.L. BL. III K STR. MAGURICEA nr. 7-11 A.L. BL. VIIIF STR. BORSA nr. 25 A.L. BL. 3H-ANSAMBLU AVIATIEI STR. BORSA nr. 26-28 A.L. BL. 6F STR. AVIATIEI nr.
[Show full text]
CONTENTS PREFACE by PIERRE GUIRAL Ix FOREWORD Xi INTRODUCTION 1 ONE: DESTINY of the JEWS BEFORE 1866 1
CAROL IANCU – Romanian Jews CONTENTS PREFACE BY PIERRE GUIRAL ix FOREWORD xi INTRODUCTION 1 ONE: DESTINY OF THE JEWS BEFORE 1866 1. Geopolitical Development of Romania 13 2. Origin of the Jews and Their Situation Under the Native Princes 18 3. The Phanariot Regime and the Jews 21 4. The Organic Law and the Beginnings of Legal Anti-Semitism 24 5. 1848: Illusive Promises 27 6. The Jews During the Rebirth of the State (1856-1866) 30 TWO: THE JEWISH PROBLEM BECOMES OFFICIAL 1. Article 7 of the Constitution of 1866 37 2. Bratianu's Circulars and the Consequences Thereof 40 3. Adolphe Crémieux, The Alliance, and Émile Picot 44 4. Sir Moses Montefiore Visits Bucharest 46 THREE: PERSECUTIONS AND INTERVENTIONS (1868-1878) 1. The Disturbances of 1868 and the Draft Law of the Thirty-One and the Great Powers 49 2. The Circulars of Kogalniceanu and Their Consequences 55 3. Riots and Discriminatory Laws 57 4. Bejamin Peixotto's Mission 61 FOUR: FACTORS IN THE RISE OF ANTI-SEMITISM 1. The Religious Factor 68 2. The Economic Factor 70 3. The Political Factor 72 4. The Xenophobic Factor 74 FIVE: PORTRAIT OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY 1. Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews: Clothing, Language, Names, Habitat, Occupations 77 2. Demographic Evolution 82 3. Disorganization of Community Life 84 4. Isolation and Integration 85 SIX: THE CONGRESS OF BERLIN AND NON-EMANCIPATION 1. Romania and the Jews in the Wings of the Berlin Congress 90 2. Article 44 of the Berlin Treaty 92 3. Emancipation or Naturalization? 94 4. The New Article 7 of the Constitution and Recognition of Romanian Independence 105 SEVEN: ANTI-SEMITIC LEGISLATION 1.
[Show full text]
The Behavioural Dynamics of Romania's Foreign Policy In
THE BEHAVIOURAL DYNAMICS OF ROMANIA’S FOREIGN POLICY IN THE LATE 1990s: THE DRIVE FOR SECURITY AND THE POLITICS OF VOLUNTARY SERVITUDE Eduard Rudolf ROTH Abstract. This article investigates the nature, the magnitude and the impact of the exogenously articulated preferences in the articulation of Romania’s foreign policy agenda and behavioural dynamics during the period 1996-2000. In this context, the manuscript will explore Romania’s NATO and (to a lesser extent) EU accession bids, within an analytical framework defined by an overlapped interplay of heterochthonous influences, while trying to set out for further understanding how domestic preferences can act as a transmission belt and impact on foreign policy change in small and medium states. Keywords: Romanian foreign policy, NATO enlargement, EU enlargement, Russian-Romanian relations, Romanian-NATO relations, Romania-EU relations 1. Introduction By 1995 – with the last stages of the first Yugoslav crisis confirming that Moscow cannot adequately get involved into complex security equations – and fearing the possible creation of a grey area between Russia and Western Europe, Romanian authorities embarked the country on a genuinely pro-Western path, putting a de facto end to the dual foreign policy focus, “ambivalent policy”,1 “double speak”2 or “politics of ambiguity” 3 which dominated Bucharest’s’ diplomatic exercise throughout the early 1990s. This spectral shift (which arguably occurred shortly after Romanian President Iliescu’s visit in Washington) wasn’t however the result of a newly-found democratic vocation of the indigenous government, but rather an expression of the conviction that such behaviour could help the indigenous administration in its attempts to secure the macro-stabilization of the country’s unreformed economy and to acquire security guarantees in order to mitigate the effects of the political and geographical pressures generated by the Transdniestrian and Yugoslav conflicts, or by the allegedly irredentist undertones of Budapest’s foreign policy praxis.
[Show full text]
Great Romania Under the Menace of the European Extremism and Revisionism
RSP • No. 58 • 2018: 62-72 R S P ORIGINAL PAPER Great Romania under the Menace of the European Extremism and Revisionism Florin Nacu* Abstract: In this article, there is presented the way in which the adversaries of Great Romania made efforts to fight for its dismemberment, immediately after 1918. The Great Union coincided with the revolution from 1917, and the reinvigoration of revisionism, due to the degree of permissiveness in the Peace Treaties from Paris-Versailles, 1919-1920. The actions meant to destabilise Romania were carried out both from the interior and exterior. There were subversive, violent actions, coordinated by the Soviet and German secret services. Romania did not manage to have a position on the international plan for counteracting the effects of the German and Soviet proximity, which had been foreseen by the diplomat Nicolae Titulescu. In the 22 years, the period Great Romania resisted, there could be seen how complex the evolution of the internal and external politics was, promoted by the decisional factors from Bucharest. The conclusion is that the degradation of the international political system, the ascension of the revisionism, the lack of a coherent dialogue between the representatives of the Romanian political currents, the emerging and the evolution of the extremes represent the causes that led to the collapse of Great Romania, in the summer of 1940. Keywords: right extreme; left extreme; Germany; USSR; revisionism * Ph.D., „CS Nicolăescu Plopșor” Social Humanistic Research Institute, 3rd degree researcher, Craiova; Phone: 0040761617067; Email: [email protected] 62 Great Romania under the Menace of the European Extremism and Revisionism Introduction In the present article, there is to be presented the way in which the Great Union from 1918 was influenced by both the internal and external context.
[Show full text]
International Scientific Committee
INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Ion NEAGU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Jose Luis de la CUESTA, University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain; Viorel CORNESCU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Mihai HOTCA, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Gabriel BOROI, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Ion M. ANGHEL, President of the Romanian Society of European Law; Lorena BACHMAIER WINTER, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain; Felipe GÓMEZ ISA, University of Deusto, Spain; Elena ANDREEVSKA, SEE University, Tetovo, Macedonia; Augustin FUEREA, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Vasile DOBRINOIU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Traian DIMA, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Serghei MĂRGULESCU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Bogdan MICU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Elena NEDELCU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Nicolae POPA, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Viorel ROȘ, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Mircea DAMASCHIN, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Valentina VASILE, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Constantin BRĂGARU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Liviu RADU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Claudia CLIZA, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Adina CREȚAN, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Cristian GHEORGHE, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Roxana Mariana POPESCU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Mirela GORUNESCU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Constantin NEDELCU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Mircea SINESCU, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Maria GRIGORE, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Vasile NEMEȘ, "Nicolae Titulescu" University; Mădălina RĂDOI,
[Show full text]
George G. Potra, Nicolae Titulescu. Arhive Pierdute. Dosarul Unei
Recenzii. Note – Reviews, Notes 133 George G. Potra, Nicolae Titulescu. Arhive pierdute. Dosarul unei recuperări, Centrul Cultural “Lucian Blaga” – Sebeş, Fundaţia Culturală “Lucian Blaga” – Sebeş, 2015, 600 p. + 209 ilustraţii The archives are some of the main repositories of information we appeal to as individuals, as a community or people. They represent a form of memory we go to for long term research or for immediate interests. We check almost on a daily basis their role and importance in society. Taking the risk of a reproof for exaggerating, I state that in any historical evocation, in any contemporary evaluation and in any future project, we cannot ignore data and ideas kept in archives as premises of any material or spiritual construction. As an institution, the archives in Romania identify their act of birth 170 years ago. The explanation for this tardive reality is to be found in both objective and subjective factors, which have been rigorously identified and analyzed by the historians of the Romanian archives. I am in a rush to underline that, despite all legal regulations, of the stage corrections, administrative, economic and financial measures to consolidate their structures and functionality, under the sign of organicity and efficiency, the institution of the archives has recorded in Romania serious dysfunctions and grave accidents (during war or calamities). With each of these, the informational content of Romanian archives has been affected. The subsequent efforts – no matter how consistent or well-intended – could only reconstruct and restore in a fragmentary and uncertain manner the segments of local and even national history – economic, ethnic, confessional, cultural a.s.o.
[Show full text]
Romanian Prime Minister Gheorghe Tătărescu in the Capitals of the Little Entente: Belgrade (1936) and Prague (1937)
Institute for Political Studies UDC 327(498)(437)(497.1)”1936/1937” Serbian Political Thought https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.6642019.1 No. 4/2019, Year XXVI, Article received: 27.08.2019. Vol. 66 Accepted for publishing: 05.11.2019. pp. 05-23 Original scientific paper Marusia Cîrstea*1 University of Craiova – Faculty of Social Sciences, Romania Romanian Prime Minister Gheorghe Tătărescu in the Capitals of the Little Entente: Belgrade (1936) and Prague (1937) Abstract The present article presents certain aspects of the relations between Romania, the Czech Republic and Yugoslavia in the inter- war period. The fourth decade of the last century in particular was extremely rich in political, diplomatic and military events. Within this international context, Romanian Prime Minister Gheorghe Tătărescu (1934-1937) sought to establish bilateral contacts – with the great powers of Europe, but mainly with the members of the Little Entente – meant to both strengthen bilateral relations and clarify the states’ perspective on the events in progress. During his visits to Belgrade and Prague – as emerges from the press of the time – Gheorghe Tătărescu permanently advocated maintaining the status-quo and the political, economic and military cooperation between the states of the Little Entente. Key words: the Little Entente, Gheorghe Tătărescu, Milan Hodža, Milan Stojadinović. * Associate Professor [email protected] 5 SERBIAN POLITICAL THOUGHT Introduction Gheorghe Tătărescu was appointed Prime Minister of Roma- nia on 5 January 1934 by King Carol II (Giurescu 2003: 428). He left his mark on the entire government activity in 1934-1937, promoting, on the economic plane, a policy of stimulation of the national industry; on the social plane, he supported the assertion of a middle-class group connected to the state; and on the foreign plane he sought to preserve the Versailles system, to promote regional alliances – the Little Entente and the Balkan Entente, – to prevent both Germany and the Soviet Union from dominating south-eastern Europe (Chistol 2007).
[Show full text]
The Socialist Trend in the Modern Romania and Its Influence on the Social Structures
RSP • No. 55 • 2017: 22-31 R S P ORIGINAL PAPER The Socialist Trend in the Modern Romania and Its Influence on the Social Structures Florin Nacu* Abstract The article depicts the manner in which the socialist trend tried to influence the political life in modern Romania. The socialists tried to create theoretical patterns, influenced by similar trends from the industrialised societies of the Western Europe, along with those coming from the neighbouring Eastern society, the Tsarist Russia. The social conditions from Romania were not similar to those of the occidental states, as much as the level of the political culture did not allow the peasants and the workers to fight a battle. Moreover, the electoral system left only limited possibilities for the front-ranker peasants, who only wished to enlarge their property, not to adhere to the socialist values. Many of the socialists integrated among the liberals, those who remained faithful reorienting themselves towards the communist trend, after 1981. On the background of a relative antipathy against Russia, especially after 1979, the Romanian politicians kept the socialists under observation. After 1921, when the socialists organised themselves in the Communist Party from Romania, their ideological affiliation to the Soviet directives, obliged them to adopt an antinational attitude, not only an “anti-oligarchic” one, which, in 1924, outlawed them, for the following two decades. Keywords: socialism, oligarchy, political trends, social structures, revolution * PhD, „CS Nicolăescu Plopor” Social Humanistic Research Institute, Craiova, Phone: 0040761617067, Email: [email protected] 22 The Socialist Trend in the Modern Romania and Its Influence on the Social Structures Introduction.
[Show full text]
Arhive Personale Şi Familiale
Arhive personale şi familiale Vol. 1 Repertoriu arhivistic 2 ISBN 973-8308-04-6 3 ARHIVELE NAŢIONALE ALE ROMÂNIEI Arhive personale şi familiale Vol. I Repertoriu arhivistic Autor: Filofteia Rînziş Bucureşti 2001 4 • Redactor: Ioana Alexandra Negreanu • Au colaborat: Florica Bucur, Nataşa Popovici, Anuţa Bichir • Indici de arhive, antroponimic, toponimic: Florica Bucur, Nataşa Popovici • Traducere: Margareta Mihaela Chiva • Culegere computerizată: Filofteia Rînziş • Tehnoredactare şi corectură: Nicoleta Borcea, Otilia Biton • Coperta: Filofteia Rînziş • Coperta 1: Alexandru Marghiloman, Alexandra Ghica Ion C. Brătianu, Alexandrina Gr. Cantacuzino • Coperta 4: Constantin Argetoianu, Nicolae Iorga Sinaia, iulie 1931 Cartea a apărut cu sprijinul Ministerului Culturii şi Cultelor 5 CUPRINS Introducere……………………………….7 Résumé …………………………………..24 Lista abrevierilor ……………………….29 Arhive personale şi familiale……………30 Bibliografie…………………………….298 Indice de arhive………………………...304 Indice antroponimic……………………313 Indice toponimic……………………….356 6 INTRODUCERE „…avem marea datorie să dăm şi noi arhivelor noastre întreaga atenţie ce o merită, să adunăm şi să organizăm pentru posteritate toate categoriile de material arhivistic, care pot să lămurească generaţiilor viitoare viaţa actuală a poporului român în toată deplinătatea lui.” Constantin Moisil Prospectarea trecutului istoric al poporului român este o condiţie esenţială pentru siguranţa viitorului politic, economic şi cultural al acestuia. Evoluţia unei societăţi, familii sau persoane va putea fi conturată
[Show full text]
Editors of Romanian Political Speeches Roxana Patraș
Ways of Forgetting and Remembering the Eloquence of the 19th Century: Editors of Romanian Political Speeches Roxana Patraș Abstract: The paper presents a critical evaluation of the existing anthologies of Romanian oratory and analyzes the pertinence of a new research line: how to trace back the foundations of Romanian versatile political memory, both from a lexical and from an ideological point of view. As I argue in the first part of the paper, collecting and editing the great speeches of Romanian orators seems crucial for today’s understanding of politics (politicians’ speaking/ actions as well as voters’ behavior/ electoral habits). In the second part, I focus on the particularities generated by a dramatic change of media support (in the context of Romania’s high rates of illiteracy at the end of the 19th century): from “writing” information on the slippery surface of memory (declaimed political texts such as “proclamations,” “petitions,” and “appeals”) to “writing” as such (transcribed political speeches). The last part of the paper problematizes the making of a new canon of Romanian eloquence as well as the opportunity of a new assemblage of oratorical texts, illustrative for the 19th century politics, and endeavors to settle a series of virtual editing principles. Keywords: oratory, personal memory, political memory, recording strategies, professional editing 1. Introduction Beginning with the end of the 19th century, when the Romanian politicians understand how crucial for one’s career it is to have a good command over the art of eloquence, the interest in the selection, organization and editing of influential public speeches becomes manifest.
[Show full text]
Book of Abstracts
Book of Abstracts INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE HISTORY, SPIRITUALITY, CULTURE. DIALOGUE AND INTERACTIVITY 6th Edition ORGANIZED BY "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Romania Faculty of History, Philosophy and Theology SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Professor GAVRILUŢĂ Nicu (“Al. I. Cuza” University of Iaşi, Romania)/ Professor COMAN Claudiu (“Transilvania” University of Braşov, Romania)/ Professor MYKHAILUTSA Mykola (Odessa National Maritime University, Ukraine)/ Professor KUSHNIR Viaceslav ("I. I. Mechnikov" University of Odessa, Ukraine)/ Professor TSIGANENCO Lilia (Izmail State University of Humanities, Ukraine)/ Professor BENLARBI Driss (Université Moulay Ismail, Maroc)/ Professor PAVÓN Rafael García (Universidad Anáhuac, México)/ Professor DOBRE Cătălina Elena (Universidad Anáhuac, México)/ Professor IPS CRĂCIUN Casian (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania)/ Professor ENACHE George (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania)/ Professor APETREI Cristian (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania)/ Professor ROTILĂ Viorel (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania)/ Professor GĂLĂŢANU Daniel (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania)/ Professor LUPAŞCU Silviu ((“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania) / Professor POPA Anişoara (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania)/ Associate Professor GUMENÂI Ion (State University of Moldova, Kishinev, Republic of Moldova)/Associate Professor LEMENI Adrian (University of Bucharest, Romania)/ Associate Professor GHELEŢCHI Ion (B.P. Hasdeu” University of Cahul, Republic of Moldova)/ Associate Professor COSTIN Croitoru (B.P. Hasdeu” University of Cahul, Republic of Moldova, “Carol I” Museum of Brăila, Romania)/ Associate Professor DINICĂ Răzvan (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania)/Associate Professor LIUŞNEA Mihaela Denisia (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania)/ Associate Lecturer NEDU Ovidiu (University of Bucuresti, Paul Paltanea History Museum of Galati), Lecturer MARDAR Antoanela Marta (“Dunărea de Jos” University of Galaţi, Romania).
[Show full text]
Nicolae Iorga – Nicolae Titulescu
GGEORGE GG.. PPOTRA NNICOLAE IIORGA –– NNICOLAE TTITULESCU IINTERFERENȚE Fundația Europeană Titulescu NICOLAE IORGA – NICOLAE TITULESCU INTERFERENŢE GEORGE G. POTRA NICOLAE IORGA – NICOLAE TITULESCU INTERFERENŢE FUNDAŢIA EUROPEANĂ TITULESCU BUCUREȘTI 2011 Lucrare apărută cu sprijinul Administraţiei Fondului Cultural Naţional Copertă și tehnoredactare: Victor Potra Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României POTRA, GEORGE G. Nicolae Iorga - Nicolae Titulescu : interferenţe / George G. Potra. - Bucureşti : Editura Fundaţia Europeană Titulescu, 2011 Index ISBN 978-606-8091-09- 9 930(498) Iorga,N. 94(498)"19" Titulescu,N. Studierea vieţii politice din România interbelică m-a pus în faţa unor constatări extrem de contrariante privind relaţiile interumane dintre unele personalităţi afirmate în prima jumătate de veac. Am trecut peste stereotipuri, peste afirmaţii din partea unor necunoscători sau alegaţii din partea unor oameni care sunt „specialişti“ în toate epocile, problemele şi personalităţile istoriei naţionale. Mă voi limita să afirm că este greu de acceptat că Nicolae Iorga, Octavian Goga şi Gheorghe Brătianu s-au regăsit solidari în denigrarea lui Nicolae Titulescu, în „războiul“ pentru scoaterea acestuia din viaţa politică. Desigur, raţiunile de ordin general şi particular au fost diferite de la caz la caz, după cum la fel de diferite au fost şi mijloacele de acţiune. Rămâne de elucidat, până la capăt, în toate aceste trei cazuri, care au fost raţiunile, forţele şi reţelele care s-au regăsit, voluntar sau involuntar, în spatele acestor adversari anti-Titulescu. Cei trei au acţionat din interese şi impulsuri diferite, conştient sau inconştient, nu se poate analiza şi evalua atitudinea lor pornind de la şi sprijiniţi pe premisa că ar fi fost plătiţi sau că ar fi avut raţiuni eminamente subiective şi meschine.
[Show full text]