DOCSLIB.ORG

Structural Design Buildings Version 1.1, October 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Structural Design Buildings Version 1.1, October 2014 Capability Statement Capability Statement: Structural Design Buildings For further information please contact us: Jan Janssen Jan Font Freide T: +31 (0)24 3284627 T: +31 (0)10 2865366 M: +31 (0) 6 20414509 M: +31 (0) 6 22245513 E: [email protected] E: [email protected] Secretariat: Naomi Derksen Marian den Hartog T: +31 (0)24 3284643 T: +31 (0)10 2865389 Copyright © October 2014 HaskoningDHV Nederland B.V. Project details throughout this document may have been utilised the services of companies previously acquired by Royal HaskoningDHV. Structural Design © HaskoningDHV Nederland B.V. 1 1 Contents 1 Structural Design, Buildings ...................................................................................... 3 1.1 Structural Design ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Added Value ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) & Building Information Modelling (BIM) ................................................ 4 2 Specialties, Structural Design Advisory group ....................................................... 5 2.1 Tall / High Rise Buildings ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Urban development / High Rise Buildings .......................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Redevelopment / Low weight buildings .............................................................................................................. 8 2.4 Specialism & Innovations ................................................................................................................................... 8 3 Projects ...................................................................................................................... 10 4 Awards, publications, memberships ....................................................................... 20 5 Staff ............................................................................................................................ 24 6 Buildings .................................................................................................................... 28 6.1 Buildings ........................................................................................................................................................... 29 6.3 Innovation strategy ........................................................................................................................................... 29 6.2 Markets ............................................................................................................................................................ 29 7 Royal HaskoningDHV ............................................................................................... 30 7.1 Company Profile ............................................................................................................................................... 31 7.2 Our Sectors ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 Structural Design © HaskoningDHV Nederland B.V. 2 1 Structural Design, Buildings Structural Design, Buildings 1.1 Structural Design Creative, innovative, sustainable and practical solutions for building designs. That is what we provide. Working closely with our Clients, architects and building partners, we strive to ensure that the very best projects are delivered on time and within budget, while enhancing society with a brighter, more sustainable future. 1.3 Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) & The advisory group Structural Design is part of the Building Information Modelling (BIM) Business Line Buildings and has approximately 75 staff members located in three countries: the Netherlands, Building Information Models (BIM) are increasingly India and United Arab Emirates (UAE). being used by our experts to develop our projects. Virtual Design & Construction (VDC) is an effective step 1.2 Added Value forward in creating efficient building designs. The VDC approach which has been developed in cooperation As environmental issues continue to change with with Stanford University and the University of Delft, increasing speed, the requirements which buildings focuses on product, process and organisation, before must meet in terms of sustainability and cost- the actual detailed design is carried out. Royal effectiveness become ever more demanding. Our focus HaskoningDHV uses integrated rooms (I Rooms), in is in creating structural designs using innovative which we stimulate the integrated approach using technologies to deliver built environments that best suit virtual models to create the most efficient design. our clients’ needs, with the emphasis on buildability, This approach has advantages such as time sustainability, flexibility and safety. We ensure that the optimisation, cost effectiveness and risk reduction, best solution can be built at minimum expense in terms without affecting the quality of the finished product. It of total cost of ownership, but can also be exciting, leads to a smooth integration process with all refreshing and beautiful. Our experts are active in stakeholders and disciplines within the design team. identifying new trends, emerging challenges and technical advancements which we develop into promising opportunities. By using our advanced technical skills and business networking, we are able to convert opportunities into innovative solutions which offer value within society. Structural Design © HaskoningDHV Nederland B.V. 4 2 Specialties, Structural Design Advisory group Specialties of our Structural Design Advisory Group 2.1 Tall / High Rise Buildings HaskoningDHV have been the structural designers. In 2013 ‘New Babylon’ was a European finalist. In 2014 Tall buildings are no longer exceptions; they are ‘The Rotterdam’ was winner. At the time CTBUH gradually becoming the preferred modality of a vertical stated: “De Rotterdam is an exercise in formal city. interpretation that is at once reminiscent of an imported In the Netherlands the opportunities for high rise mid-century American skyscraper, but epitomizes the construction are extremely limited due to small off-center experimentalism of modern Dutch art of the available footprints and unfavourable ground foregoing century. Though it is the largest building in conditions, often resulting in challenging slender the Netherlands, its mass is broken down into three designs. Royal HaskoningDHV have been responsible interconnected mixed-use towers”. for the design of approximately 50% of all tall buildings in the country and as as such, we are well adapt to Available project reference sheets of our high rise overcoming all challenges that come with high rise buildings are: design and construction. 1) The Rotterdam, Rotterdam (Winner CTBUH Best Tall Building Europe 2014 / In the top 10 of “Most Economic structural designs Glamorous Buildings Around The World”); Tall buildings have unique challenges. Iconic 2) New Babylon, The Hague (Winner in the category architecture, mixed programmes (residential, office, Architecture Specials of the Iconic Awards 2014 / nd hotel, retail and parking) are gradually finding new ways Cobouw award ´Best housing project 2011´ / 2 into vertical cities. As a result, high rise construction is place CTBUH Best Tall Building 2013, Europe fast becoming the main form of urban design to Region); overcome the ever increasing problem of available 3) New Orleans, Rotterdam; land. 4) Het Strijkijzer, The Hague (Emporis Skyscraper Award 2007 Best Tall building / New City Award We believe that sustainability, efficiency as well as 2007); innovative technologies and fast construction methods 5) De Kroon, The Hague (winner Concrete Award should be fully integrated into a structural design to 2011). achieve an economic building. Weblinks: Innovations Royal HaskoningDHV on CTBUH.org: http://members.ctbuh.org/royal-haskoningdhv Traditionally, tall buildings are constructed in either concrete, steel or a combination of both. A major High rises by Royal HaskoningDHV: challenge can be finding economy in design due to the http://skyscrapercenter.com/company/1465 large loads that need to be supported. However our structural experts are constantly exploring new ways of Blog Maurice Hermens on CTBUH conference: constructing lighter, more cost effective buildings and http://enhancingsocietytogether.blogspot.nl/2014/09/urb are currently developing a new ultra light system for tall an-densification-sky-is-limit.html buildings. In High rise design, Architects are constantly pushing the boundaries, and the requirements for maximising internal space can be challenging for the structural designer. To combat this, Royal HaskoningDHV has taken the innovative approach to use the building façade as load bearing element. Awards The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) has awarded several designs on which Royal Structural Design © HaskoningDHV Nederland B.V. 6 Specialties of our Structural Design Advisory Group 2.2 Urban development / High Rise Buildings In a densely populated country like the Netherlands, particularly in the inner
Recommended publications
  • Bijlage 1: Lijst Hoogbouw 70 Meter En Hoger Verdie- Nr

    Bijlage 1: Lijst Hoogbouw 70 Meter En Hoger Verdie- Nr

    Bijlage 1: Lijst hoogbouw 70 meter en hoger Verdie- Nr. Naam Stad Functie Bouwjaar pingen Hoogte 1 Montevideo Rotterdam Wonen 2005 43 152 2 Delftse Poort Rotterdam Kantoor 1991 41 151 3 Hoftoren Den Haag Kantoor 2003 29 142 4 Westpoint Tilburg Wonen 2004 48 142 5 Rembrandt Toren Amsterdam Kantoor 1995 35 135 6 Het Strijkijzer Den Haag Wonen 2008 41 132 7 Millennium Rotterdam Kantoor 2000 34 131 8 The Red Apple Rotterdam Wonen 2008 38 127 9 World Port Center Rotterdam Kantoor 2001 32 123 10 Mondriaan Toren Amsterdam Kantoor 2002 31 123 11 Achmea Leeuwarden Kantoor 2002 28 115 12 Erasmus Medisch Centrum Rotterdam Onderwijs 1968 26 112 13 Prinsenhof Den Haag Kantoor 2005 25 109 14 Waterstadtoren Rotterdam Wonen 2004 36 109 15 Fortis Bank Blaak Rotterdam Kantoor 1996 28 107 16 Weenatoren Rotterdam Wonen 1990 32 106 17 Coopvaert Rotterdam Wonen 2006 29 106 18 World Trade Center Tower 6 Amsterdam Kantoor 2004 27 105 19 ABN AMRO hoofdkantoor Amsterdam Kantoor 1999 24 105 20 De Admirant Eindhoven Wonen 2006 31 105 21 Symphony I Amsterdam Wonen 2008 29 105 22 Weenacenter Rotterdam Wonen 1990 32 104 23 Castalia Den Haag Kantoor 1998 20 104 24 Hoge Heren I Rotterdam Wonen 2000 34 102 25 Hoge Heren II Rotterdam Wonen 2000 34 102 26 Schielandtoren Rotterdam Wonen 1996 32 101 27 Provinciehuis Noord Brabant Den Bosch Kantoor 1971 23 101 28 De Stadsheer Tilburg Wonen 2007 31 101 29 Porthos Eindhoven Wonen 2006 31 101 30 Mahler 4 Amsterdam Kantoor 2005 25 100 31 Oosterbaken Hoogvliet Wonen 2006 32 99 32 Pegasus Rotterdam Wonen 2002 31 98 33 Millennium
  • IEA HPC 2017 Rotterdam City Brochure

    IEA HPC 2017 Rotterdam City Brochure

    12th IEA HEAT PUMP CONFERENCE 2017 Rotterdam 12TH IEA HEAT PUMP CONFERENCE WORLD TRADE CENTER ROTTERDAM 15 - 18 MAY 2017 ‘We’re from Rotterdam - we’ll keep going!’ appeared on a placard just days after by combining heat pumps with thermal the city was devastated by the WWII aerial bombings on 14 May 1940. This motto energy storage (ATES) in principal in many ways typifies the resolute character of Rotterdam and its inhabitants. In always in combination with district the war’s aftermath, a buzzing metropolis was built literally on the post-blitz ruins, heating. including a heating-network throughout the center. Sustainability is an important element In Rotterdam today, immigrants from over 170 different nations help create the city’s of Rotterdam’s vision. The thermal open and cosmopolitan atmosphere. The resolute perseverance of Rotterdam’s energy plan for the underground makes citizens still defines the city’s continual push for innovation at all levels of business, room for heat pump projects. Room for government and community life. innovation, but also literally: room to prevent interference between different Rotterdam is synonymous with innovation, whether it is in architecture, the creative sector thermal storage projects. or the port. Home to Europe’s largest port, Rotterdam is often a trendsetter. Just think of the Maasvlakte II project, extending the port into the sea, and of the architectural tours Rotterdam shows that having district de force in the Kop van Zuid district. heating does not exclude heat pumps nor energy storage, having this base The city on the Maas river is home to the offices of many of the world’s leading load opens opportunities.
  • PDF Van Tekst

    PDF Van Tekst

    Monumenten in Nederland. Groningen Ronald Stenvert, Chris Kolman, Ben Olde Meierink, Sabine Broekhoven en Redmer Alma bron Ronald Stenvert, Chris Kolman, Ben Olde Meierink, Sabine Broekhoven en Redmer Alma, Monumenten in Nederland. Groningen. Rijksdienst voor de Monumentenzorg, Zeist / Waanders Uitgevers, Zwolle 1998 Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/sten009monu04_01/colofon.php © 2010 dbnl / Ronald Stenvert, Chris Kolman, Ben Olde Meierink, Sabine Broekhoven en Redmer Alma i.s.m. schutblad voor Ronald Stenvert, Chris Kolman, Ben Olde Meierink, Sabine Broekhoven en Redmer Alma, Monumenten in Nederland. Groningen 2 Uithuizermeeden, Herv. kerk (1983) Ronald Stenvert, Chris Kolman, Ben Olde Meierink, Sabine Broekhoven en Redmer Alma, Monumenten in Nederland. Groningen 4 Stedum, Herv. kerk, interieur (1983) Ronald Stenvert, Chris Kolman, Ben Olde Meierink, Sabine Broekhoven en Redmer Alma, Monumenten in Nederland. Groningen 6 Kiel-Windeweer, Veenkoloniaal landschap Ronald Stenvert, Chris Kolman, Ben Olde Meierink, Sabine Broekhoven en Redmer Alma, Monumenten in Nederland. Groningen 7 Voorwoord Het omvangrijke cultuurhistorische erfgoed van de provincie Groningen wordt in dit deel van de serie Monumenten in Nederland in kaart gebracht. Wetenschappelijk opgezet, maar voor het brede publiek op een toegankelijke wijze en rijk geïllustreerd gebracht. Monumenten in Nederland biedt de lezer een boeiend en gevarieerd beeld van de cultuurhistorisch meest waardevolle structuren en objecten. De serie is niet bedoeld als reisgids en de delen bevatten dan ook geen routebeschrijvingen of wandelkaarten. De reeks vormt een beknopt naslagwerk, een bron van informatie voor zowel de wetenschappelijk geïnteresseerde lezer als voor hen die over het culturele erfgoed kort en bondig willen worden geïnformeerd. Omdat niet alleen de ‘klassieke’ bouwkunst ruimschoots aandacht krijgt, maar ook de architectuur uit de periode 1850-1940, komt de grote verscheidenheid aan bouwwerken in Groningen goed tot uitdrukking.
  • The Urban and Cultural Climate of Rotterdam Changed Radically Between 1970 and 2000. Opinions Differ About What the Most Importa

    The Urban and Cultural Climate of Rotterdam Changed Radically Between 1970 and 2000. Opinions Differ About What the Most Importa

    The urban and cultural climate of Rotterdam changed radically between 1970 and 2000. Opinions differ about what the most important changes were, and when they occurred. Imagine a Metropolis shows that it was first and foremost a new perspective on Rotterdam that stimulated the development of the city during this period. If the Rotterdam of 1970 was still a city with an identity crisis that wanted to be small rather than large and cosy rather than commercial, by 2000 Rotterdam had the image of the most metropolitan of all Dutch cities. Artists and other cultural practitioners – a group these days termed the ‘creative class’ – were the first to advance this metropolitan vision, thereby paving the way for the New Rotterdam that would begin to take concrete shape at the end of the 1980s. Imagine a Metropolis goes on to show that this New Rotterdam is returning to its nineteenth-century identity and the developments of the inter-war years and the period of post-war reconstruction. For Nina and Maria IMAGINE A METROPOLIS ROTTERDAM’S CREATIVE CLASS, 1970-2000 PATRICIA VAN ULZEN 010 Publishers, Rotterdam 2007 This publication was produced in association with Stichting Kunstpublicaties Rotterdam. On February 2, 2007, it was defended as a Ph.D. thesis at the Erasmus University, Rotterdam. The thesis supervisor was Prof. Dr. Marlite Halbertsma. The research and this book were both made possible by the generous support of the Faculty of History and Arts at the Erasmus University Rotterdam, G.Ph. Verhagen-Stichting, Stichting Kunstpublicaties Rotterdam, J.E. Jurriaanse Stichting, Prins Bernhard Cultuurfonds Zuid-Holland and the Netherlands Architecture Fund.
  • Proefschrift-Van Melik.Indd 1 27-03-2008 13:41:16 Nederlandse Geografische Studies / Netherlands Geographical Studies

    Proefschrift-Van Melik.Indd 1 27-03-2008 13:41:16 Nederlandse Geografische Studies / Netherlands Geographical Studies

    Changing public space The recent redevelopment of Dutch city squares Veranderende openbare ruimte De recente herontwikkeling van Nederlandse stadspleinen (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. J.C. Stoof, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 21 mei 2008 des ochtends te 10.30 uur door Rianne Gertruda van Melik geboren op 7 juli 1980 te Horst titelblad-van Melik.indd 1 27-03-2008 13:45:15 Promotor: Prof.dr. J. van Weesep Co-promotor: Dr. I. van Aalst titelblad-van Melik.indd 2 27-03-2008 13:45:15 Changing public space proefschrift-van Melik.indd 1 27-03-2008 13:41:16 Nederlandse Geografische Studies / Netherlands Geographical Studies Redactie / Editorial Board Drs. J.G. Borchert (Editor in Chief ) Prof. Dr. J.M.M. van Amersfoort Dr. P.C.J. Druijven Prof. Dr. A.O. Kouwenhoven Prof. Dr. H. Scholten Plaatselijke Redacteuren / Local Editors Drs. R. van Melik, Faculteit Geowetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht Dr. D.H. Drenth, Faculteit der Managementwetenschappen Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen Dr. P.C.J. Druijven, Faculteit der Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Drs. F.J.P.M. Kwaad, Fysich-Geografisch en Bodemkundig Laboratorium Universiteit van Amsterdam Dr. L. van der Laan, Economisch-Geografisch Instituut Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Dr. J.A. van der Schee, Centrum voor Educatieve Geografie Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Dr. F. Thissen, Afdeling Geografie, Planologie en Internationale Ontwikkelingsstudies Universiteit van Amsterdam Redactie-Adviseurs / Editorial Advisory Board Prof. Dr. G.J.
  • Hoogbouw in De Ruimte

    Hoogbouw in De Ruimte

    Master Thesis Economische Geografie Hoogbouw in de Ruimte Rinse Gorter Augustus 2008 Studentnr: 1300083 Begeleider: Prof. Dr. P.H. Pellenbarg Opleiding: Economische geografie 2 -2- Voorwoord Voor u ligt het onderzoek dat ik gedaan heb ter afronding van de masteropleiding Economische Geografie aan de RijksUniversiteit te Groningen. In een paar zinnen voorafgaande aan het werkelijke onderzoek wil ik graag alle mensen in mijn omgeving bedanken voor hun bijdrage, hulp en steun. In het bijzonder wil ik mijn vader bedanken voor zijn op- en aanmerkingen die mij vaak verder hielpen in het schrijfproces. Daarnaast wil ik Prof. Dr. P.H. Pellenbarg bedanken die mij begeleid heeft bij het schrijven van mijn masterthesis. Verder wil ik Dhr. A. Edzes bedanken voor het vervullen van de taak als tweede begeleider. Natuurlijk zijn ook vrienden en andere familieleden onmisbaar geweest bij het tot stand komen van dit eindproduct. Rinse Gorter, 10 juli 2008 3 -3- Abstract This thesis, written in the finalizing stage of the master’s degree in Economic Geography at the RijksUniversiteit Groningen, is about high-rise buildings in the Netherlands. The title ‘Hoogbouw in de Ruimte’ would literally be translated in English as ‘High-rise buildings in Space’ but (because mankind is still not able to build on the moon) should be read as ‘high- rise buildings and their environment’. High-rise buildings in the Netherlands are starting to play an increased role in Dutch municipal policy. Because of the lack in national high rise building policy, most of the major cities have developed their own policy on skyscrapers. When we look at the history of the skyscraper in the Netherlands, there has been a shift from public development before the 1980’s to private development after 1990.
  • Hoogbouwbeleid Lessen Tien Hoogbouw? Waarom De Discussie

    Hoogbouwbeleid Lessen Tien Hoogbouw? Waarom De Discussie

    ONDER DE BOMEN HOLLANDSE STAD - Ambities van de stad - Een studie naar Nederlandse hoogbouwcultuur In Nederland zijn hoge gebouwen steeds vaker onderwerp van discussie. De afgelopen jaren worden gestaag steeds meer hoogbouwprojecten gerealiseerd. Soms vanuit een duidelijke wens in de stad, maar net zo vaak zonder stedelijk doel. Veel gemeentes zijn op zoek naar een rode draad en de meerwaarde van hoogbouw voor hun stad. Wat is goede hoogbouw en wat kan het betekenen? Deze publicatie bekijkt het Nederlandse hoogbouwlandschap anno 2008. Wat kan hoogbouw betekenen voor de stad? Welke HOOG aspecten verdienen meer aandacht bij de realisatie van een toren? Wat zijn essentiële randvoorwaarden voor een geslaagd project? En wat is de rol en het belang van de gemeente, architect, ontwikkelaar, belegger en burger in het complexe speelveld van hoogbouw in een overlegcultuur? BOUW ISBN 978-90-809293-4-0 Inhoudsopgave Voorwoord Tien Lessen 6 Hoge gebouwen raken steeds meer ingeburgerd in Waarom Hoogbouw? 8 het Nederlandse landschap. Vroeger was hoogbouw De Discussie 10 voorbehouden aan de centra van de grote steden met soms Tilburg een 'verdwaalde' toren aan de snelweg of langs de kust. Arnhem Heerlen Sinds halverwege de jaren ‘80 lijkt hoogbouw echter Belle van Zuylen definitief doorgebroken. Rotterdam profileert zich, sinds de ontwikkeling van het Weena, als hoogbouwstad. Den Haag en Amsterdam ontwikkelen hoogstedelijke Het Perspectief 16 stationsomgevingen rond hun HSL-stations. In Utrecht Hoogbouw in de wereld ontspint zich een discussie over de bouw van de Belle van Hoogbouw in Nederland Zuylen, een toren van 260 meter hoog aan de A2. Ook in Hoogtepunten andere steden zoals Tilburg, Eindhoven en Maassluis zijn Definities inmiddels hoogbouwprojecten gerealiseerd.
  • High Rise: Our Expertise

    High Rise: Our Expertise

    HIGH-RISE OUR EXPERTISE 15,000 110 EMPLOYEES WORLDWIDE YEARS’ EXPERIENCE 70+ 5 NATIONALITIES CONTINENTS N°69 2 billion+ INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTOR OF SALES ENR TOP 250 RANKING Cover picture: Burj Khalifa, Dubai, UAE Picture below: New Orleans, Rotterdam, The Netherlands 02 BESIX GROUP EXCELLING IN CREATING SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS FOR A BETTER WORLD BESIX is a leading Belgian business group, operating on BESIX is an international reference in the building, maritime five continents in construction, real estate development works, environment, sports and leisure facilities, industrial and concessions. buildings, road, rail, port and airport sectors. The Group is currently working on dozens of projects in around Its iconic achievements include Dubai’s Burj Khalifa, the 25 countries on five continents. world’s tallest tower; the Grand Egyptian Museum on the Giza pyramids plateau; the Ferrari World Leisure Center in Abu Its policy of sector diversification is also bearing fruit. Dhabi, the Carpe Diem building in Paris’s La Défense district; Its Concessions & Assets activities have taken off in recent the Al Wakrah Stadium, built for the FIFA World Cup Qatar years. BESIX’s expertise allows it to handle projects from 2022; and the Jebel Ali water treatment plant, an ongoing financial structuring to design and construction through project that will treat Dubai’s entire wastewater to the highest to maintenance. For its part, the Real Estate Development environmental standards. activity led by BESIX RED offers innovative real estate solutions in the residential, commercial and office sectors in five European countries. BESIX’s unique expertise is ensured by it having an in-house Engineering Department, at the forefront of contemporary technologies.
  • Rationalising the Structural Material Choice Process for High Rise Buildings in the Netherlands Master Thesis

    Rationalising the Structural Material Choice Process for High Rise Buildings in the Netherlands Master Thesis

    €env€ Rationalising the Structural Material Choice Process for High Rise Buildings in the Netherlands Master Thesis E.M.R. Koopman Rationalising the Structural Material Choice Process for High Rise Buildings in the Netherlands E. (Esmee) M.R. Koopman – 4730593 [email protected] [email protected] Master Civil Engineering: Building Engineering – Structural Design Technical University of Delft, The Netherlands Company: Arcadis, Rotterdam Period: October 2019 – June 2020 Defence: 10th of July, 2020 Graduation committee: ir. J.G. Rots, ir. R. Crielaard, ing. P. De Jong, ing. Tom Borst 2 Abstract De Randstad is popular place to work and live. The amount of residents will continue to grow and because of that, the housing demand increases the coming years. To accommodate the city growth in a small country as the Netherlands is, the municipalities of de cities in De Randstad turn to high rise buildings. The floor plan of a high rise building gets repeated on every floor and because of that, the design decisions that are part of this repetition are important. The structural material choice is one of these repeated design decisions and thus important. The structural material choice is also important, because it is linked to all the disciplines on the design team and factors like cost and sustainability. Currently 64% of the high rise buildings in the world have only reinforced concrete as structural material. Of the buildings in the Netherlands above 120 m, 86% have only reinforced concrete as structural material. This raises the question if the preference in the Netherlands for concrete comes from a clear decision-making process or if it originates elsewhere? In theory this decision-making process follows an organized cycle called the Basic design cycle.

  • Roaming Rotterdam Route (Approx

    ROAMING EN ROTTERDAM Walking / bicycle route through imposing architecture Visit Museum Boijmans ROAMING Van Beuningen and embark on an THROUGH ROTTERDAM adventure through art from the Middle Ages to Welcome to Rotterdam, the city that enjoys growing inter­ the twenty-first century. national acclaim as a popular destination for city trips. Why? Discover the museum’s You’ll find out for yourself as you roam throughR otterdam. unique collection of The walking route brings you past iconic architecture and masterpieces by Bosch, shows the eclectic mix of old and new that has made Rotter­ Rembrandt, Van Gogh dam so famous – from the Late Gothic architecture of the and Dalí. Add to this the sensational temporary Laurenskerk to the futuristic Markthal. From the Cube Hou­ exhibitions of art and ses on Blaak to the gleaming high­rise buildings on the Kop design from different van Zuid peninsula. The route also takes you through resi­ eras and the restaurant dential neighbourhoods, parks and shopping streets and with its outlook on the along sidewalk cafés, museums and the waterfront. From statue garden, and you Erasmus Bridge you’ll enjoy the view of the Maas River and are guaranteed hours the water taxis and ships sailing by. You’re looking out at of enjoyment in the one of the world’s biggest ports – not to mention that museum. spectacular skyline that Rotterdam is famous for. www.boijmans.nl Walking the entire Roaming Rotterdam route (approx. 10 km) Maurizio Cattelan, Untitled, 2001. Copyright Maurizio Cattelan, courtesy Marian Goodman Gallery, New York. Photo: Attilio Maranzano takes about half a day.
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    FRANK VAN DER HOEVEN, STEFFEN NIJHUIS HI RISE! I CAN SEE YOU PLANNING AND VISIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF HIGH BUILDING DEVELOPMENT IN ROTTERDAM 12.1 INTRODUCTION Western European cities like London, Paris, Rotterdam and Frankfurt am Main have seen im- pressive high building developments over the past two decades. This has led them to develop policies for regulating the planning and construction of tall buildings, high-rise buildings and skyscrapers within their territory. So far, these high building developments and policies have received little attention from the academic community. This chapter elaborates a framework for analysing high building development and the visual impact of high buildings on the surround- ing landscape with the city of Rotterdam as a Western European showcase. It presents a system- atic approach for analysing high building development in terms of architectural height, year of completion, location and functional use, for use in the comparison of existing buildings with the urban policies that are in place. Comprehensive GISc-based viewsheds were used to analyse the visibility of the high buildings, factoring in both meteorological circumstances and the vertical area of the buildings. The showcase city of Rotterdam demonstrates that a considerable distance exists between the vision and reality. The city struggles to deliver a consistent and integrated policy for high-building urban areas, while the high building developments themselves seem to be ruled by a remarkable internal logic that is not fully recognised in policymaking. The impact of tall buildings, high-rises and skyscrapers on neighbourhoods, urban districts and cities is widely acknowledged by architects, urban planners, politicians and developers all 277 over the world.
  • RIS298448 Bijlage Haagse Hoogbouw, Eyeline En Skyline

    RIS298448 Bijlage Haagse Hoogbouw, Eyeline En Skyline

    Haagse hoogbouw Eyeline en Skyline 15 november 2017 2 NOTA HAAGSE HOOGBOUW: EYELINE EN SKYLINE Haagse skyline. Foto: Bart van Vliet INHOUD VOORWOORD 5 6. REGELS EN AMBITIES STADSBREED 29 6.1 Typologie 29 SAMENVATTING 7 6.1.1 Stedelijke laag 29 6.1.2 Plint 31 1. INLEIDING 11 6.1.3 Toren 33 1.1 Waarom nu een nieuwe nota? 11 6.1.4 Kroon 35 1.2 Samen stadmaken 11 6.2 Duurzaamheid en groen 36 1.3 De kansen en de uitdaging 11 6.2.1 Duurzaam gebouw en gebied 36 6.2.2 Groen- en natuurinclusief gebouw en gebied 37 2. DOEL, status en samenhang 12 6.2.3 Buitenruimte 37 2.1 Doel 12 6.2.4 Klimaatbestendige gebouwen en buitenruimte 39 2.2 Status 12 6.3 Microklimaat: zon, schaduw en wind 39 2.3 Juridische doorwerking 12 6.4 Wonen 41 2.4 Samenhang met ander beleid 13 6.5 Bergingen en afval 41 6.6 Parkeren 41 3. DE OPGAVEN 15 6.7 Veiligheid 43 3.1 Agenda Ruimte voor de Stad 15 6.8 Tijdelijke bouwplaats 43 3.2 ‘Slim groeien’ 15 3.3 Wonen 15 7. INTENSIVERINGSGEBIEDEN 45 3.4 Economie en voorzieningen 17 7.1 Het Central Innovation District 45 3.5 Duurzaamheid en groen 18 7.1.1 Nieuw Centrum 46 3.5.1 Gebouw en gebied 18 7.1.2 Omgeving Den Haag Centraal 47 3.5.2 Buitenruimte en groen 18 7.1.3 Beatrixkwartier 49 3.5.3 Klimaatbestendig ontwerp 19 7.1.4 Laakhaven Centraal 50 3.6 Mobiliteit 19 7.1.5 Schenkverbinding 51 7.2 Binckhorst 52 4.