Technical-Economic Substantiation of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technical-Economic Substantiation of The PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Technical-economic substantiation of the development of tourist route(-s) in the section: Ivangorod (The Narova River) – The Rosson River (Children sanitary centre) – Silent Lake Saint-Petersburg January 2008 The Leningrad regional state institution «Information – Tourist Center» - 1 - PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Plan 1. Studying the present situation 1.1. Development of water tourism in Leningrad region 1.1.1. General situation 1.1.2. Present infrastructure 1.1.3. Existent routes 1.1.3.1. Camp routes 1.1.3.2. Cruise lines 1.1.3.3. Regular communication 1.1.4. Sail-motor tourism development 1.1.5. Sports fishing in the region 1.1.6. Perspectives for the development of water tourism in Leningrad region 1.2. Investigation of potentially suitable places for water tourism along the route 1.2.1. Description of the rivers 1.2.2. Present recreation areas and parking places on the banks of the Narova River, Rosson River and lake Silent (Vaikne) 1.2.3. Historical places upon the Narova and the Rosson rivers. 1.2.4. History of navigation along the Narova and Rosson Rivers, Silent lake. 1.2.5. Existent mooring constructions along the route 1.2.6. Existent ships on the rivers that. 1.2.7. Approaches to Parking places 1.2.8. Resume concerning apt places for water tourism 1.3. Legal regulations of the development of the route(-s) along the rivers Narova, Rosson and lake Silent 1.3.1. Boundary regime rules. 1.3.2. Rules of the use of ships of small size and constructions for their berthing 1.3.3. Rules of carriage of passengers 1.3.4. Boundary conditions for fleet of a small size in the wells of Leningrad region 1.3.5. Boundary conditions in particularly protected nature territory 1.3.6. “Kurgalskiy reserve” 1.3.7. Conclusions on legal boundary conditions for the development of water route 1.4. Studying survey results 1.5. Resume on the present situation in the section of the rivers Narova – the Rosson – Silent lake for the development of water route(-s) 2. Studying potentially possible target groups. 2.1. Questioning of Tour firms working in he mass water tourism market 2.2. Questioning of tourists 2.3. Forming of potential target groups 3. Description of the scenarios of possible routes 3.1. route 1 3.2. route 2 3.3. route 3 3.4. route 4 3.5. route 5 3.6. Variant of a complex route. The Leningrad regional state institution «Information – Tourist Center» - 2 - PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION 4. Analysis of component parts of the water route 4.1. Factor analysis of the routes: 4.1.1. route 1 4.1.2. route 2 4.1.3. route 3 4.1.4. route 4 4.1.5. route 5 4.1.6. Complex route 4.2 SWOT-analysis. 5. Choosing passenger excursion-promenade ship. 6. Calculation of the economic substantiation of the route 6.1. variant 1 6.2. variant 2 6.3. variant 3 6.4. variant 4 6.5. choosing optimum variant of the route 7. Marketing plan 8. Final part 9. Annex The Leningrad regional state institution «Information – Tourist Center» - 3 - PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION 1. Studying present situation 1.1. Development of water tourism in Leningrad region 1.1.1. General situation Aspiration for changes is the main driving motive for the development of a person. When the main driving motive is a search for new impressions one can speak about the rise of tourism. Social shocks at the end of the previous century in Russia brought to almost complete disappearance of tourism as social phenomena, but following economic stabilization has restored «status quos». Statistic data, regularly collected in Leningrad region since 2000, tells about the sustainable increase of interest of Russians and other countries citizens in the opportunities of the territory on the forming of new unforgettable impressions. Dynamics of the increase of the quantity of organized tourists visiting Leningrad region Number, thousand people 1700 1800 1700 1500 1600 1500 1356 1400 1203 1300 1200 1030 1100 1000 870 900 750 800 700 600 500 300 350 400 219 256,3 300 130 145 170 200 100 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Number of organized tourists that have visited Leningrad region F oreign tourists (thousand people) Number of organized tourists that have visited Leningrad region Tourists in total (thousand people) Yearly the quantity of tourists visiting the region is commensurable to the quantity of permanently living in the territory inhabitants. The number of tourists’ attendants, workers in tourism service is constantly increasing. Figures given in the diagrams tell that Leningrad region is a perspective territory. The Leningrad regional state institution «Information – Tourist Center» - 4 - PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Dynamics of the permanent work places increase (in tourism firms and accommodation centers) % regarding the previous year 2006 7,0% 12000 10,4% 2005 11200 12,3% 2004 10050 Working places 10,9% years % of increase according 2003 9100 2,0% to the previous 2002 8100 year 21,4% 2001 7950 2000 6550 Work places Yearly the quantity of really working in the territory of the region collective accommodation centers increase, the number of working in the region tour firms proliferates. The tourism sphere potential of the region is far from being used up; data of statistic observation are evidence of it. Now the number of people working in this sphere is less than 1% of able to work people of the region, the quantity of tourists accepted in the territory without prejudice to ecology and economy can be increased in 3 times regarding nowadays. The quantity of really working in the territory of the region collective accommodation centers 450 403 400 400 360 350 325 290 300 281 250 232 200 150 100 50 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 The Leningrad regional state institution «Information – Tourist Center» - 5 - PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Dynamics of alteration of the tour firms registered in the territory of Leningrad region Tour firms that have two licenses (tour operator and tour agency) Tour firms in total 200 number 150 56 59 38 46 100 31 128 107 108 115 126 50 84 92 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Taxes taking into the regional budget system from the companies working in tourism sphere have significantly proliferated, especially for the latest years. It’s the evidence of the stirring up of work of the tourism sphere enterprises and of the rise of social reasonability of business representatives. Sum of taxes taken into the Russian Federation budget system 400 390 350 300 250 200 150 100 28,2 54,6 50 21,3 22,7 25,5 28 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 The Leningrad regional state institution «Information – Tourist Center» - 6 - PROJECT PART-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION 1.1.2. Present infrastructure The territory of Leningrad region is rich in rivers, lakes and channels. These water ways have always been used for trade, cultural and other communications. The ancient trade way “from Varangian into Greeks” went along the rivers of the region. Big rivers, lakes and channels form river systems that are navigated for the space of 2054 km including main 600 km – Volga-Baltic way (Baltic Sea, the Gulf of Finland, the Neva, the Ladoga, the Svir, and the Onega), Saimenskiy channel. There are 1800 big and small lakes located in the territory, among them: Ladozhskoe lake (18400 km2), Chudskoe lake (2611 km2), Onezhskoe lake (9890 km2), lake-river system of the Vuoksa (95,6 km2). River lines connect many cities and villages of the region; in a season on some of them a regular navigation of river ships is established. In the territory of the region there are three big passenger and trade ports: Vyborg, Vysotsk, Ust-Luga. River ports are situated in Shlisselburg, Priozersk, Podporozhie, Voznesenie. River berths exist and functionate in Lodeinoe pole, Svirstroy, Mandrogi, Old Ladoga. Mooring walls exist in the villages Vladimirovka, Sias’story and in the cities Primorsk, Ivangorod. There are yacht clubs in New Ladoga and Vyborg. From collecting new bright impressions point of view hardly ever any other kind of tourism can be compared to the water one. Traditionally, with a view to organize tourism-recreation rest 4 basic directions of water tourism are used: cruise, sail-motor, camp (with the use of motorless ships) and regular water communication. All these directions are represented in the region. From all 130 tour firms, registered in the territory of the region, only 2 have incomes from water tourism exceeding 50%. In Saint-Petersburg not less than 10 shipping companies, giving their services in the water spaces of Leningrad region, are registered. 1.1.3. Present routes Almost at all the lines passenger, cargo-and-passenger ships and ferries, that are exploited not less than 8 years and are after the capital repair, are used. Total quantity of ships used in the region for recreation purposes doesn’t exceed 100 items. The relevance of this kind of rest is quite big; more than 80% charge of the summer cruise lines is the evidence of it. According to statistic data collected by the Physical training, Sport and youth Committee, in 2006 only to the cities Lodeinoe pole and Sias’stroy 300 calls by the ships chartered outside the region were made. 1.1.3.1. Camp kind of water tourism with the use of motorless ships.
Recommended publications
  • Common Heritage Совместное Наследие
    COMMON HERITAGE СОВМЕСТНОЕ НАСЛЕДИЕ The multicultural heritage of Vyborg and its preservation Мультикультурное наследие Выборга и его сохранение COMMON HERITAGE СОВМЕСТНОЕ НАСЛЕДИЕ The multicultural heritage of Vyborg and its preservation Proceedings of the international seminar 13.–14.2.2014 at The Alvar Aalto library in Vyborg Мультикультурное наследие Выборга и его сохранение Труды мeждународного семинара 13.–14.2.2014 в Центральной городской библиотеке А. Аалто, Выборг Table of contents Оглавление Editor Netta Böök FOREWORD .................................................................6 Редактор Нетта Бёэк ПРЕДИСЛОВИЕ Graphic design Miina Blot Margaretha Ehrström, Maunu Häyrynen: Te dialogical landscape of Vyborg .....7 Графический дизайн Мийна Блот Маргарета Эрстрëм, Мауну Хяйрюнен: Диалогический ландшафт Выборга Translations Gareth Grifths and Kristina Kölhi / Gekko Design; Boris Sergeyev Переводы Гарет Гриффитс и Кристина Кëлхи / Гекко Дизайн; Борис Сергеев Publishers The Finnish National Committee of ICOMOS (International Council for Monuments and Sites) and OPENING WORDS The Finnish Architecture Society ..........................................................12 Издатели Финляндский национальный комитет ИКОМОС (Международного совета по сохранению ВСТУПИТЕЛЬНЫЕ СЛОВА памятников и достопримечательных мест) и Архитектурное общество Финляндии Maunu Häyrynen: Opening address of the seminar ............................15 Printed in Forssa Print Мауну Хяйрюнен: Вступительное обращение семинара Отпечатано в типографии Forssa Print
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Published Version of a Chapter
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a chapter published in Conflict and Cooperation in Divided Towns and Cities. Citation for the original published chapter: Lundén, T. (2009) Valga-Valka, Narva – Ivangorod Estonia’s divided border cities – cooperation and conflict within and beyond the EU. In: Jaroslaw Jańczak (ed.), Conflict and Cooperation in Divided Towns and Cities (pp. 133-149). Berlin: Logos Thematicon N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published chapter. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-21061 133 Valga-Valka, Narva-Ivangorod. Estonia’s Divided Border Cities – Co-operation and Conflict Within and beyond the EU Thomas Lundén Boundary Theory Aboundary is a line, usually in space, at which a certain state of affairs is terminated and replaced by another state of affairs. In nature, boundaries mark the separation of different physical states (molecular configurations), e.g. the boundary between water and air at the surface of the sea, between wood and bark in a tree stem, or bark and air in a forest. The boundaries within an organized society are of a different character. Organization means structuration and direction, i.e. individuals and power resources are directed towards a specific, defined goal. This, in turn, requires delimitations of tasks to be done, as well as of the area in which action is to take place. The organization is defined in a competition for hegemony and markets, and with the aid of technology. But this game of definition and authority is, within the limitations prescribed by nature, governed by human beings.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Twinning 5 of the Modern Gdańsk Shares Its Knowledge After EURO 2012 6 Twinning Areas
    • AALBORG • AARHUS • ARENDAL • BERGEN • BOTKYRKA • CĒSIS • CHOJNICE • ELBLĄG • ELVA • ESPOO • FALUN • GARGŽDAI • GÄVLE • GDAŃSK • GDYNIA • GREIFSWALD • GULDBORGSUND • HAAPSALU • HALMSTAD • HELSINKI • HIIU • JĒKABPILS • JELGAVA • JÕGEVA • JÕHVI • JŪRMALA • JYVÄSKYLÄ • KALININGRAD • KALMAR • KARLSKRONA • KARLSTAD • KAUNAS • KEILA • KEMI • KIEL • KLAIPĖDA • KØGE • KOLDING • KOSZALIN • KOTKA • KRISTIANSAND • KRISTIANSTAD • KRYNICA M. • KURESSAARE • LAHTI • LIEPĀJA • LINKÖPING • LÜBECK • LULEÅ • ŁEBA • MAARDU • MALBORK • MALMÖ • MARIEHAMN • MIĘDZYZDROJE • MIELNO • NARVA • NÆSTVED • ÖREBRO • OSKARSHAMN • PALANGA • PALDISKI • PANEVĖŽYS • PÄRNU • PORI • PORVOO • PRUSZCZ GD. • RAKVERE • REDA • RIGA • ROBERTSFORS • ROSTOCK • ŠIAULIAI • SILLAMÄE • SŁUPSK • SÖDERHAMN • SOPOT • ST. PETERSBURG • SZCZECIN • TALLINN • TAMPERE • TARTU • TIERP • TRELLEBORG • TUKUMS • TURKU • UMEÅ • USTKA • VAASA • VÄSTERVIK • VÄXJÖ • VILJANDI • VILNIUS • VISBY • VORDINGBORG • VÕRU in the Baltic SeaRegion Baltic the in Town T winning winning Baltic Cities Bulletin Dear UBC Friends, The Union of the Baltic Cities is the biggest organisation grouping EDITOR IN CHIEF local authorities in the region. The potential is even greater if we add Paweł Żaboklicki all twin cities within the network and in the whole Baltic Sea Region. The majority of the UBC cities have at least two twin towns, many * have even several. This makes our organization a far larger network, with an enormous capabilities. But here many questions come up. Is EDITING & LAYOUT twinning fully exploited? Is it
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 06.10.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109078651 ARG 7233.0000 PICHANAL ARG 64W13'34'' 23S19'09'' FX 1 ADD 2 109078654
    [Show full text]
  • Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the Next Crimea?
    Eurasian Geography and Economics ISSN: 1538-7216 (Print) 1938-2863 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rege20 Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the next Crimea? David J. Trimbach & Shannon O’Lear To cite this article: David J. Trimbach & Shannon O’Lear (2015): Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the next Crimea?, Eurasian Geography and Economics, DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1110040 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2015.1110040 Published online: 11 Nov 2015. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rege20 Download by: [University of Kansas Libraries] Date: 11 November 2015, At: 09:04 Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2015.1110040 Russians in Estonia: Is Narva the next Crimea? David J. Trimbach* and Shannon O’Lear Department of Geography, University of Kansas, 1475 Jayhawk Blvd., 213 Lindley Hall, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA (Received 31 May 2015; accepted 15 October 2015) Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and involvement in Ukrainian border regions pose serious consequences and questions. The precedence of Russian military intervention illustrates the porosity and potential for conflicts in other post-Soviet border regions. The Estonian borderland city of Narva, populated predominantly by Russian-speakers, is one such potential site of tension. Based on preliminary findings and data collected in Narva in 2013, this article provides an overview of citizenship, identity, and geographic affiliation issues among Narva’s Russian-speaking commu- nity in an effort to generate insights as to how any Russian overtures and potential intervention might be received in Narva.
    [Show full text]
  • Musicians Blend Jazz Rhythms Across Estonia- Russia Border
    United States Source: The Washington Post Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/musicians-blend-jazz-rhythms-across- estonia-russia-border/2021/04/30/fc90791e-a9d0-11eb-a8a7-5f45ddcdf364_story.html on 6 May, 2021 World Musicians blend jazz rhythms across Estonia- Russia border Russian saxophonist Alexey Kruglov performs in the Ivangorod Fortress on the Russian-Estonian border in Ivangorod, 130 km (80 miles) west of St.Petersburg, Russia, Friday, April 30, 2021. Musicians on the Estonian- Russian border held an unusual concert on Friday, with Estonian guitarist Jaak Sooaar and Russian saxophonist Alexey Kruglov performing from the castles on the opposing banks of the Narva river that marks the border between the two countries. The concert was held on the International Jazz Day by the two musicians as an act of friendship despite the deteriorating relations between the two countries and as cross-border contacts have been limited due to the corona-virus pandemic. (AP Photo/Dmitri Lovetsky) By Maris Hellrand | AP April 30, 2021 at 12:27 p.m. EDT NARVA, Estonia — Two jazz musicians gave an unusual concert Friday on the Estonia-Russia border, where Estonian guitarist Jaak Sooäär and Russian saxophonist Alexey Kruglov performed from castles on the opposing banks of the river that separates their countries. The musicians combined rhythms on International Jazz Day as an act of friendship, despite the deteriorating relations between Russia and Estonia. The coronavirus pandemic has limited opportunities for cross-border contact. “As the border stayed closed, I have friends on the other side of the border with whom I wanted to play with, so we decided to do it,” Sooäär said before the concert.
    [Show full text]
  • JOINT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME for the Estonia-Russia Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020
    JOINT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME of Estonia-Russia Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 Table of Contents JOINT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME of Estonia-Russia Cross-Border Cooperation Programme 2014-2020 ........................................................................................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROGRAMME AREA .......................................................................... 6 1.1. Programme area map .................................................................................................... 7 1.2. Core regions .................................................................................................................. 7 1.3. Adjoining regions ......................................................................................................... 7 1.4. Participation of the adjoining regions in Finland and Latvia ........................................ 9 2. PROGRAMME STRATEGY ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Strategic and thematic objectives and priorities ......................................................... 11 2.2. A justification of the chosen strategy .......................................................................... 14 2.2.1. Socio-Economic and environmental analysis of the programme area ........ 14 2.2.1.1. Business and SME development
    [Show full text]
  • The Carried Out(Spent) Analysis of the Received Data Testifies
    CONCEPT OF WATER AND ECO TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AT THE RUSSIAN AREA OF PEIPUS / PSKOV LAKELAND NGO “Chudskoye Project” PSKOV 2005 WATER AND ECO TOURISM DEVELOPMENT AT PEIPUS / PSKOV LAKELAND © 2005 CONTENTS PART I. Analysis of water and ecological tourism at the Russian area of Peipus / Pskov lake basin .......................................................................................................................2 Section 1. General provisions ..................................................................................2 Section 2. An ecological situation at water reservoirs of fish management use .......5 Section 3. Flora and fauna .......................................................................................6 Section 4. Protected territories .................................................................................9 Section 5. Analysis of the Resolution # 172 «Border zone in Gdov, Pskov, Pechory, Palkino, Pytalovo, Krasnogorodsk, Sebezh municipalities of the Pskov region» and the Resolution # 177 «Border zone in Leningrad region» .................................................................................15 Section 6. Cultural and historical sites....................................................................17 Section 7. Tourism infrastructure. Pskov, Gdov, Pechory municipalities (Pskov region), Kingissepp, Slantsy municipalities and Ivangorod town (Leningrad region) .................................................................................19 Section 8. Analysis of tourist visits in Peipus/Pskov
    [Show full text]
  • NC-DKG Estonia, St Petersburg & Moscow
    NAME: NC-DKG Russia TRIP ID: 1-2017 NC-DKG Estonia, St Petersburg & Moscow - Jul 2017 This is an independent trip organized by a DKG member and is not endorsed or sponsored by Delta Kappa Gamma International. Mon. Jul 24, 2017 Group departs USA - Airfare TBD Tue. Jul 25, 2017 Group arrives in Tallinn Accommodations, conference admission, and touring in Tallinn arranged separately Tours in Tallin will be conducted through the conference website and provided at a later date. Of course, there will be options for guests who are not participating in the conference during the daytime. Wed. Jul 26, 2017 Group attends the Dalta Kappa Gamma European Regional Conference at the Nordic Hotel Forum in Tallinn, Estonia Thu. Jul 27, 2017 Group attends the Dalta Kappa Gamma European Regional Conference at the Nordic Hotel Forum in Tallinn, Estonia Fri. Jul 28, 2017 Group attends the Dalta Kappa Gamma European Regional Conference at the Nordic Hotel Forum in Tallinn, Estonia Sat. Jul 29, 2017 Group attends the Dalta Kappa Gamma European Regional Conference at the Nordic Hotel Forum in Tallinn, Estonia Estonian Assistant - meets group in the Nordic Hotel Forum lobby and accompanies group to Narva Private Coach - arrives at the Nordic Hotel Forum in Tallinn and transfers group to St Petersburg with stop in Narva Free time in Narva to explore on own History Lesson: The main feature of Narva is a 12th Century castle overlooking the Narva River. Climb to the top and you can peer down on its ancient nemesis - the fortress of Ivangorod that sprawls along the opposite bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Tb Chapter 6 Star Forts
    Chapter 6 Energy Star Forts Angola | Azores | Belarus | Belgium | Bermuda | Brazil | Canada | Chile | China | Croatia | Cuba | Czech Republic | Denmark Egypt | Estonia | Finland | France | Germany | Greece | Haiti | Honduras | Hungary | India | Iran | Italy | Japan | Kazakhstan Kenya | Latvia | Lithuania | Malaysia | Malta | Mexico | Morocco | Netherlands | Norway | Pakistan | Peru | Philippines Poland | Portugal | Puerto Rico | Romania | Russia | Serbia | Slovakia | South Africa | Spain | Sri Lanka | Suriname Sweden | Taiwan | Turkey | United Kingdom | USA | Uruguay | Venezuela | Vietnam Over 319 Starfort’s are listed on Starfort.com. The first Starforts are said to have been built as early as the early 1500’s, exactly when the Romanov’s were setting about conquering vast areas of Tartary. According to historian star forts, or bastion forts, were built, as they maximized defensiveness against cannonball impacts and offered better protection and better views of the battlefield for those inside the fort. The Tartarians created Star Forts and Star Cities as a vibrational frequency eco-system to provide a sense of joy and harmony amongst the community. Th Star Cities are their own self-contained environment. Star Forts are structures that are built with sacred geometric patterns that represents the cosmos metaphysically or symbolically; a microcosm of the universe. In understanding A Star City we need to define the elements of what makes up this type of city. There are five key elements that lead us to discover the Tartaria civilization: 1. The remains of a large lake 2. Long channels (Venice, Italy) 3. Stone Bridges of unusual shape, allowing for large vessels to pass. (London Bridge) 4. Stone Streets (Italy, Spain, Switzerland etc..) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • A Man Who Served His Country
    Глава третья Глава четвертая Родом из Сибири Служение Отечеству Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Born and Raised in Siberia A Man Who Served his Country 126 127 Владимир Якунин Vladimir Yakunin председатель попечительского совета Центра национальной славы Chairman of the Board of Trustees, Center for Russian National Glory, России (ЦНС) и Фонда святого апостола Андрея Первозванного (ФАП) St. Andrew the First-Called Foundation ячеслав Иванович был одним из руководите- t work, Mr. Lupachev was one of the directors of Влей Мариинского театра. А для нас всех он был Athe Mariisnky Theatre; when the workday was другом, отзывчивым и добрым человеком. Его по- over, he was our friend, and a remarkably kind and мощь и поддержка, профессионализм и безмер- approachable person. His help and support, profes- ная преданность Мариинскому театру и всем нам, sionalism, and boundless committment to the Ma- поклонникам русского искусства, неоценимы. Во riinsky Theatre and all of us who appreciate Russian всех своих начинаниях он добивался успеха. Это art were invaluable. He achieved success in all of his была творческая личность европейского масшта- endeavors. He became known all over Europe as a ба, созидатель и пример современного динамич- progressive, dynamic leader who was always open to ного руководителя, открытого для прогресса и new and innovative solutions and also generated his инноваций. Передовые технологии менеджмента own ideas and set an example for others. In the arts, в искусстве без обращения к истинным ценностям cutting-edge management principles alone will not высокой духовности и патриотизму не имеют шан- ensure successful outcomes; one must also uphold сов на успех, и потому общественная составляю- spiritual and patriotic values, as Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Regimes of the Russian– Swedish Border in the Novgorod Lands
    Adrian Selin,Kuzma Kukushkin, Ivan Sablin, Elena Kocheryagina REGIMES OF THE RUSSIAN– SWEDISH BORDER IN THE NOVGOROD LANDS BASIC RESEARCH PROGRAM WORKING PAPERS SERIES: HUMANITIES WP BRP 149/HUM/2017 This Working Paper is an output of a research project implemented at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE). Any opinions or claims contained in this Working Paper do not necessarily reflect the views of HSE Adrian Selin1, Kuzma Kukushkin2, Ivan Sablin3, Elena Kocheryagina4 REGIMES OF THE RUSSIAN–SWEDISH BORDER IN THE NOVGOROD LANDS5 The working paper analysed the infrastructure of the Russian-Swedish border from a transcultural perspective. The history of the border was split into three periods following major changes in political border regimes. The first period covered the history of the border between Sweden and the Novgorod Republic after its formal delimitation in 1323. The annexation of the Novgorod Lands to the Grand Duchy of Moscow in 1478 marked the beginning of the second period. The third period, which is discussed in detail, covered the history of border infrastructure between the transition of large part of the Novgorod Lands to Sweden in 1617 and 1700. Departing from the debate whether the border was a line or a zone and overcoming state-centred approaches, the working paper demonstrated that the existence of several parallel border regimes during different periods enabled the simultaneous existence of the border as a line and a zone pertaining to different social interactions and subject to manipulation by authorities. The consolidation of the border did not follow the Treaty of Stolbovo (1617), but owed to local demands and an accidental event of an epidemic in 1629– 1630.
    [Show full text]