DOCSLIB.ORG

FAA Regional Air Service Demand Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FAA Regional Air Service Demand Study Delaware covers.qxd 7/17/07 11:22 AM Page 2 Grant #: FAA Regional 3-42-0125-003-03 (Phase I) 3-42-0125-005-05 Air Service (Phase II) Demand Study Task B — Forecast of Passengers, Operations and Other Activities May 2007 Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission ABE – ACY – TTN – Lehigh Valley Atlantic City Trenton Mercer International Airport International Airport Airport Port Authority of New York & New Jersey JFK – LGA – EWR – John F. Kennedy LaGuardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport International Airport New York State Department of Transportation SWF – HPN – ISP – Stewart International Westchester County Long Island Airport Airport MacArthur Airport SPONSORS: Federal Aviation Delaware Valley Regional Administration Planning Commission FAA Regional Air Service Demand Study Acknowledgements Study Sponsors The Federal Aviation Administration The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Consultant Team PB Americas, Inc. Landrum & Brown Airport Interviewing & Research Hirsh Associates SIMCO Engineering InterVISTAS Clough Harbour & Associates Hamilton, Rabinowitz & Alschuler The preparation of this document was financed in part through a planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as provided under Vision 100 — Century of Aviation Authorization Act. The contents reflect the opinion of the preparer and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the FAA or the DVRPC. Grants DVRPC: 3-42-0125-003-03 (Phase I); 3-42-0125-005-05 (Phase II) FAA REGIONAL AIR SERVICE DEMAND STUDY Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page I - Introduction and Task B Purpose ............................................... I-1 II - DVRPC Background..................................................................II-1 III – National Passenger Activity Trends ..................................... III-1 IV – Catchment Area identification ............................................... IV-1 V – Catchment Area Demographics ................................................ V-1 V.1 Lehigh Valley...................................................................... V-1 V.2 Atlantic City........................................................................ V-1 V.3 Trenton.............................................................................. V-4 VI – Forecast Methodology ........................................................... VI-1 VI.1 Identification of Possible Forecast Methods.............................VI-1 VI.2 Total Passenger Based Solely on Catchment Area Population ....VI-3 VI.3 Unique Issues of the Study Areas Affecting Air Passengers .......VI-4 VI.4 Optimistic Scenario Assumptions ..........................................VI-7 VII. Airport Facilities............................................................ VII-1 VII.1 Lehigh Valley....................................................................VII-1 VII.2 Atlantic City......................................................................VII-1 VII.3 Trenton............................................................................VII-1 VIII. Passenger Activity Forecasts........................................ VIII-1 VIII.1 Lehigh Valley...................................................................VIII-1 VIII.1.1 Historical Passenger Traffic ................................................VIII-2 VIII.1.2 Current Airline Schedule....................................................VIII-3 VIII.1.3 Passenger Survey Information ...........................................VIII-4 VIII.1.4 Passenger Forecast...........................................................VIII-4 VIII.2 Atlantic City.....................................................................VIII-8 VIII.2.1 Historical Passenger Traffic ................................................VIII-7 VIII.2-2 Current Airline Schedule..................................................VIII-11 VIII.2.3 Background on Spirit Airlines ...........................................VIII-12 VIII.2.4 Background on Casino Gaming and Air Service ...................VIII-13 PB / L&B / AIR FAA Regional Airspace Study November 2006 Page-i FAA REGIONAL AIR SERVICE DEMAND STUDY Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont’d) CHAPTER (Cont’d) Page VIII.2.5 Passenger Survey Information .........................................VIII-14 VIII.2.6 Passenger Forecast.........................................................VIII-14 VIII.3 Trenton.........................................................................VIII-21 VIII.3.1 Historical Passenger Traffic ..............................................VIII-19 VIII.3.2 Current Airlines Schedule ................................................VIII-20 VIII.3.3 Background on Pan Am Clipper Connection ........................VIII-21 VIII.3.4 Background on Passenger Activity ....................................VIII-21 VIII.3.5 Passenger Survey Information .........................................VIII-21 VIII.3.6 Base, Optimistic, and Pessimistic Passenger Forecasts .........VIII-22 IX. Air Cargo Activity Forecast............................................................ IX-1 IX.1 Lehigh Valley.........................................................................IX-3 IX.2 Atlantic City...........................................................................IX-6 IX.3 Trenton.................................................................................IX-8 X. Forecast Aircraft Operations and Fleet Mix .................................... X-1 X.1 Lehigh Valley.......................................................................... X-1 X.2 Atlantic City............................................................................ X-8 X.3 Trenton................................................................................ X-11 XI. Impact Factors.............................................................................. XI-1 XI.1 Low Cost Carriers...................................................................XI-3 XI.2 Changes in Flight Access Regulations at LGA, JFK, and EWR..........XI-4 XI.3 Changes in Flight Access Regulations at HPN ..............................XI-5 XI.4 Fuel Prices.............................................................................XI-6 XI.5 Airline Bankruptcies................................................................ Xi-8 XI.6 Effects of Economic Upturns and Downturns ...............................XI-8 XI.7 Effects of the Attacks of September 11, 2001 – Real Decline in Short-.. Haul Travel.......................................................................... XI-10 XI.8 Effect of the Attacks of September 11, 2001 – Declining Yields for Long-Haul Travel.................................................................. XI-11 XI.9 Effects of the Attacks of September 11, 2001 – Air Cargo Industry................................................................ XI-13 XI.10 Airline Industry Outlook......................................................... XI-15 XI.11 Effect of Airside congestion .................................................... XI-15 XI.12 Effect of Regional Ground Transportation Congestion ................. XI-16 XI.13 Summary of Factors Affecting the Forecasts ............................. XI-17 PB / L&B / AIR FAA Regional Airspace Study November 2006 Page-ii FAA REGIONAL AIR SERVICE DEMAND STUDY Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont’d) TABLES Page II-1 Counties of the DVRPC and Their Population............................II-1 III-1 Total U.S. Enplaned Passengers by Decade ........................... III-1 IV-1 Catchment Areas Identification.............................................IV-1 V.1-1 Lehigh Valley Demographic Data ........................................... V-2 V.2-1 Atlantic City Demographic Data ............................................. V-3 V.3-1 Trenton Demographic Data................................................... V-5 VI.2-1 Enplaned Passenger Ration Projection ...................................VI-3 VI.4-1 Current Aircraft in Southwest’s Fleet .....................................VI-9 VI.4-2 Additional Enplaned Passenger Calculation .............................VI-9 VIII.1-1 Historical Enplanements – Lehigh Valley ..............................VIII-2 VIII.1-2 Scheduled Passenger Departures – Lehigh Valley..................VIII-3 VIII.1-3 Enplaned Passenger Forecasts – Lehigh Valley......................VIII-7 VIII.2-1 Historical Enplaned Passengers – Atlantic City ....................VIII-10 VIII.2-2 2004 and 2005 Enplanements by Airline – Atlantic City........VIII-11 VIII.2-3 Scheduled Passenger Departures – Atlantic City..................VIII-12 VIII.2-4 TAF – Base Passenger Forecast – Atlantic City ....................VIII-16 VIII.2-5 Enplaned Passenger Forecast – Atlantic City.......................VIII-20 VIII.3-1 Historical Enplaned passengers – Trenton ..........................VIII-22 VIII.3-2 Activity Forecast Assumptions – Trenton............................VIII-25 VIII.3-3 Enplaned Passenger Forecast – Trenton.............................VIII-26 IX-1 Rank and Volume of Air Cargo at Regional Hubs in 2005 ..........IX-3 IX.1-1 Historical Air Cargo – Lehigh Valley.......................................IX-4 IX.1-2 Forecast Air Cargo – Lehigh Valley........................................IX-5 IX.1-3 Forecast All-Cargo Operations – Lehigh Valley ........................IX-6 IX.2-1 Forecast Scheduled All-Cargo Aircraft Departures and Annual Volumes – Atlantic City.......................................IX-7
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Approve Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC
    DRAFT Agenda Item 3 AGENDA STAFF REPORT ASR Control 20-00 l 077 MEETING DATE: 01 /1 2/21 LEGAL ENTITY TAKING ACTION: Board ofSupervisors BOARD OF SUPERVISORS DISTRICT(S): 2 SUBMITTING AGENCY/DEPARTMENT: John Wayne Airport (Approved) DEPARTMENT CONTACT PERSON(S): Barry A. Rondinella (949) 252-5183 Dave Pfeiffer (949) 252-5291 SUBJECT: Approve Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC CEO CONCUR COUNTY COUNSEL REVIEW CLERK OF THE BOARD Concur Approved Agreement to Form Discussion 4/5 Vote Budgeted: Yes Current Year Cost: NI A Annual Cost: NIA Staffing Impact: No # of Positions: Sole Source: No Current Fiscal Year Revenue: $614,681 Funding Source: Airport Operating Fund 280: 100% County Audit in last 3 years: No Prior Board Action: 11/03/2020 #6 RECOMMENDED ACTION(S): 1. Approve and execute the Certificated Passenger Airline Lease with Allegiant Air LLC, for a term effective February 1, 2021, through December 31, 2025. 2. Authorize John Wayne Airport to allocate three Regulated Class A Average Daily Departures and seat capacity, effective February I, 2021, through December 31, 2025, consistent with the terms of the Phase 2 Commercial Airline Access Plan and Regulation. 3. Authorize the Airport Director or designee to make minor modifications and amendments to the lease that do not materially alter the terms or financial obligations to the County and perform all activities specified under the terms ofthe lease. SUMMARY: Approval of the Certificated Passenger Airline Lease between the County of Orange and Allegiant Air LLC and approval of the allocation of operating capacity will allow Allegiant Air LLC, a new carrier from the commercial air carrier new entrant waiting list, to initiate operations at John Wayne Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Hooters Air: Hot Wings Don't
    Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 15, December, 2015 Hooters Air: Hot wings don’t fly Dennis Kimerer The University of Tampa Hauimu Xing The University of Tampa Steven Lewis The University of Tampa Erika Matulich The University of Tampa Melissa Walters The University of Tampa Phil Michaels The University of Tampa ABSTRACT This instructional case is designed to develop students’ understanding of growth strategies, segment focusing, target market buying behavior, and brand expansion. The case explores a failed attempt at brand expansion by Hooters, a popular American restaurant chain that attempted to diversify into the airline industry. Hooters entered a highly competitive yet stagnant growth airline industry in 2003 as Hooters Air, targeting itself toward vacationers and golfers. Hooters Air sought to differentiate itself from other carriers with specialized flight destinations, a distinctive style of in-flight service, and first-class seating at an affordable price. After facing numerous challenges, including sky-rocketing fuel costs and general brand confusion, Hooters Air folded its wings in early 2006. The failure of Hooters Air is considered an ill-fated example of brand expansion. Keywords: Hooters Air, brand extension, marketing segmentation/positioning, diversification, marketing growth strategy Copyright statement: Authors retain the copyright to the manuscripts published in AABRI journals. Please see the AABRI Copyright Policy at http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html Hooters Air, Page 1 Journal of Business Cases and Applications Volume 15, December, 2015 TARGETED COURSES AND LEARNING OBJECTIVES This case is suitable for both undergraduate and graduate courses in marketing, management or entrepreneurship, as well as courses in which students are studying business strategies and marketing planning topics such as marketing growth strategy, branding strategy/brand expansion, new product introduction, market segmentation/positioning, and entrepreneurship.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation
    Darienite News for Darien https://darienite.com Remembrance of Airlines Past: Cameron on Transportation Author : David Gurliacci Categories : Opinion, Transportation Tagged as : Cameron on Air Travel 2019, Cameron on Transportation, Cameron on Transportation 2019, Cameron on Transportation History 2019, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column, Jim Cameron's Transportation Column 2019 Date : July 12, 2019 Rail fans call them “fallen flags.” They are railroads that no longer exist, like the original New Haven and New York Central railroads. But before I start getting all misty eyed, let’s also pay homage to airlines that have flown away into history. 1 / 3 Darienite There’s PEOPLExpress, the domestic discount airline that flew out of Newark’s grungy old North Terminal startingNews infor 1981. Darien Fares were dirt cheap, collected on-board during the flight and checked bags cost $3. You https://darienite.comeven had to pay for sodas and snacks. The airline expanded too fast, even adding a 747 to its fleet for $99 flights to Brussels, and was eventually merged with Continental under its rapacious Chairman Frank Lorenzo, later banished from the industry by the Department of Transportation. There were any number of smaller, regional airlines that merged or just folded their wings, including Mohawk, Northeast, Southeast, Midway, L’Express, Independence Air, Air California, PSA and a personal favorite, Midwest Express, started by the Kimberly Clark paper company to shuttle employees between its mills and headquarters in Milwaukee. Midwest flew DC-9s, usually fitted with coach seats in a 2-and-3 configuration, but equipped instead with business-class 2-and-2 leather seats.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Flight Statistics Report For
    DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOTAL OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC March 2014 March YEAR TO DATE % of % of % Grand % Grand Incr./ Incr./ Total Incr./ Incr./ Total 2014 2013 Decr. Decr. 2014 2014 2013 Decr. Decr. 2014 OPERATIONS (1) Air Carrier 36,129 35,883 246 0.7% 74.2% 99,808 101,345 (1,537) -1.5% 73.5% Air Taxi 12,187 13,754 (1,567) -11.4% 25.0% 34,884 38,400 (3,516) -9.2% 25.7% General Aviation 340 318 22 6.9% 0.7% 997 993 4 0.4% 0.7% Military 15 1 14 1400.0% 0.0% 18 23 (5) -21.7% 0.0% TOTAL 48,671 49,956 (1,285) -2.6% 100.0% 135,707 140,761 (5,054) -3.6% 100.0% PASSENGERS (2) International (3) Inbound 68,615 58,114 10,501 18.1% 176,572 144,140 32,432 22.5% Outbound 70,381 56,433 13,948 24.7% 174,705 137,789 36,916 26.8% TOTAL 138,996 114,547 24,449 21.3% 3.1% 351,277 281,929 69,348 24.6% 2.8% International/Pre-cleared Inbound 42,848 36,668 6,180 16.9% 121,892 102,711 19,181 18.7% Outbound 48,016 39,505 8,511 21.5% 132,548 108,136 24,412 22.6% TOTAL 90,864 76,173 14,691 19.3% 2.0% 254,440 210,847 43,593 20.7% 2.1% Majors (4) Inbound 1,698,200 1,685,003 13,197 0.8% 4,675,948 4,662,021 13,927 0.3% Outbound 1,743,844 1,713,061 30,783 1.8% 4,724,572 4,700,122 24,450 0.5% TOTAL 3,442,044 3,398,064 43,980 1.3% 75.7% 9,400,520 9,362,143 38,377 0.4% 75.9% National (5) Inbound 50,888 52,095 (1,207) -2.3% 139,237 127,899 11,338 8.9% Outbound 52,409 52,888 (479) -0.9% 139,959 127,940 12,019 9.4% TOTAL 103,297 104,983 (1,686) -1.6% 2.3% 279,196 255,839 23,357 9.1% 2.3% Regionals (6) Inbound 382,759 380,328 2,431 0.6% 1,046,306 1,028,865 17,441 1.7% Outbound
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Competition Plan Update Summary II. Gate Utilization Assessment for 2003 III. Gate Availability A. Status of Negotiations (Terminal A) B. Terminal B Gate Activity IV. Leasing and Subleasing Arrangements A. New Entry Manager B. Security Deposit C. Airline Service Standards Provision D. Requesting Airline Provision E. Oversight of Subleasing Fees V. Gate Assignment Policy A. Communication to Master Airlines B. Real Time Gate Utilization VI. Construction and Common Use Facilities A. Expansion of Terminal A B. PFC Funding VII. Website VIII. New Entrant Guidelines The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Downtown Heliport John F. Kennedy International Airport La Guardia Airport Newark Liberty International Airport Teterboro Airport COMPETITION PLAN UPDATE SUMMARY As mandated by the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21), Newark Liberty International Airport is one of several large hub airports required to submit updates to its competition plan. The last update was submitted in March 2002 and accepted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in a letter dated August 22, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of US Low Cost Carriers Entrance to the Airline Market in Colombia, South America
    International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 1 1-1-2017 Impact of US Low Cost Carriers Entrance to the Airline Market in Colombia, South America Carolina Anderson Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University – Daytona Beach, [email protected] Tamilla Curtis Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Robert F. Moss ERAU, [email protected] MaryJo O. Smith Ypsilon Associates, [email protected] Gerson Mey [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/ijaaa Part of the Business Commons, and the Management and Operations Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Anderson, C., Curtis, T., Moss, R. F., Smith, M. O., & Mey, G. (2017). Impact of US Low Cost Carriers Entrance to the Airline Market in Colombia, South America. International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15394/ijaaa.2017.1133 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Anderson et al.: Impact of US Low Cost Carriers Entrance to the Airline Market in Following a political and economic crisis in the late 1990s, many Colombian citizens decided to leave the country in search of opportunities, economic stability and most importantly, a secure place to raise a family. Most Colombian immigrants live in Florida, particularly in the Miami and the Orlando metropolitan areas. With the increase in the Colombian population in the US, and the improvement of the economic and political situation between the two countries, US LCCs such as Spirit Airlines, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix to Miami Direct Flights
    Phoenix To Miami Direct Flights stillAntemundane estivate his Shaun haunch contraindicates late. Ventilable that Howie friezing burn-up slicings that ornately Appleby and outwent sties giocosodocumentarily. and pilgrimage Strange glacially.and aperitive Bharat Miami may not to disembark from metropolises in to phoenix miami flights can How long you will not meet your flight leaves, giving rise to? Find better fare flights save money discount codes and seat sales discover travel and destination information manage upcoming trips and more. Costco Travel Home. Phoenix Private Jet Charter Flights Prices and Aircraft then Hire. Cheap flights Phoenix to Miami from 71 Compare a book. 39 Flights from Phoenix to Miami PHX to FLL Flights Orbitz. Buy Super Bowl 2020 Flights Chiefs vs 49ers. For example future private jet flight from Phoenix to Miami on a turbo prop with 4. Flight number from Phoenix AZ to Miami FL Travelmath. There are 157 nonstop flights between Phoenix and Miami per week averaging 22 per day. Google Flights. Las Vegas Nevada LAS Delta Miami Air International Mesa Airlines United. Destination MIA Miami International Airport Distance 19654 miles Interesting Facts About Flights from Phoenix to Miami PHX to MIA What airlines fly direct. There are in direct flights from Phoenix to Miami Popular non-direct route that this connection is Phoenix Sky Harbor Intl Miami Airports in Miami 1 airport There. Volaris takes you from Phoenix PHX to Culiacan CUL with clean prices Pay only for stairs you need keep your courtesy to Culiacan United States. Find Delta's Best Fare Guarantee for flights to Miami Florida MIA with direct routes available for use next tropical getaway.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2017 Newsletter
    PilotsPROUDLY For C ELEBRATINGKids Organization 34 YEARS! Pilots For KidsSM ORGANIZATION Helping Hospitalized Children Since 1983 Want to join in this year’s holiday visits? Newsletter November 2017 See pages 8-9 to contact the coordinator in your area! PFK volunteers have been visiting youngsters at Texas Children’s Hospital for 23 years. Thirteen volunteers representing United, Delta and Jet Blue joined together and had another very successful visit on June 13th. Sign up for holiday visits in your area by contacting your coordinator! “100% of our donations go to the kids” visit us at: pilotsforkids.org (2) Pilots For Kids Organization CITY: LAX/Los Angeles, CA President’s Corner... COORDINATOR: Vasco Rodriques PARTICIPANTS: Alaska Airlines Dear Members, The volunteers from the LAX Alaska Airlines Pilots Progress is a word everyone likes. The definition for Kids Chapter visited with 400 kids at the Miller of progress can be described as growth, develop- Children’s Hospital in Long Beach. This was during ment, or some form of improvement. their 2-day “Beach Carnival Day”. During the last year we experienced continual growth in membership and also added more loca- The crews made and flew paper airplanes with the tions where our visits take place. Another sign kids. When the kids landed their creations on “Run- of our growth has been our need to add a second way 25L”, they got rewarded with some cool wings! “Captain Baldy” mascot due to his popularity. Along with growth comes workload. To solve this challenge we have continually looked for ways to reduce our workload and cost through increased automation.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2015 Newsletter
    PilotsPROUDLY For C ELEBRATINGKids Organization 32 YEARS! Pilots For KidsSM ORGANIZATION Helping Hospitalized Children Since 1983 Want to join in this year’s holiday visits? Newsletter November 2015 See pages 8-9 to contact the coordinator in your area! PFK volunteers from ORF made their first visit to the Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters (CHKD). This group from Delta/VFC-12 and UAL enjoyed their inaugural visit in October and volunteers plan more visits through the holiday season. “100% of our donations go to the kids” visit us at: pilotsforkids.org (2) (3) Pilots For Kids Organization Pilots For Kids Organization President’s Corner... More Success for Dear Members, MCO Golf According to Webster’s Dictionary, the Captain Baldy was joined by an enthusiastic group of definition of fortunate is “bringing some good not golfers at Rio Pinar Country Club in Orlando on Sat- foreseen.” urday, October 24th. The golf event was followed by lunch and a silent auction that raised additional funds Considering that definition, our organization for Orlando area children. is indeed fortunate on many levels. We are fortu- nate to have members who passionately support Special thanks to all of the businesses who donated our vision, financially support our work, and vol- to make the auction a huge success. The group of unteer their valuable time to benefit hospitalized generous doners included the Orlando Magic, Jet- children. Blue, Flight Safety, SeaWorld/Aquatica, i-FLY, Embassy Suites, Hyatt Regency, Wingate, Double- Because of this good fortune, we stand out tree, Renaissance, Sonesta Suites, LaQuinta, the among many creditable charitable organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Laguardia Airport
    Aviation Department Traffic Statistics: D.Wilson, J. Cuneo THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ JUNE 2007 TRAFFIC REPORT Current month,12 months ending,year-to-date totals Showing percentage change from prior year period Month Year-to-date 12 Months Ending LGA Current % Current % Current % PASSENGERS Domestic 2,094,634 -5.1 11,718,462 -4.2 23,986,727 -2.1 International 109,583 -5.8 589,898 -6.6 1,272,111 -6.2 Total Revenue Passengers 2,204,217 -5.1 12,308,360 -4.3 25,258,838 -2.3 Non Revenue Passengers 64,627 -7.7 341,790 -10.8 718,978 -10.9 Note: Commuter - Regional Pax incl. in above 463,366 0.7 2,500,200 4.6 5,085,284 7.0 FLIGHTS Domestic 28,253 -5.9 177,628 -1.6 360,527 -0.6 International 1,768 -6.5 10,442 -4.5 21,483 -3.7 General Aviation 1,208 2.0 7,322 -1.0 14,318 -3.1 Total 31,229 -5.7 195,392 -1.8 396,328 -0.8 Note: Commuter - Regional Flights incl. in above 14,256 -3.4 91,055 3.0 184,743 4.2 FREIGHT (in short tons) Domestic 709 -46.0 4,948 -36.0 10,966 -31.6 International 16 -20.0 114 -13.0 229 -29.3 Total 725 -45.6 5,062 -35.6 11,195 -31.6 MAIL (in short tons) Total 137 -79.5 1,020 -78.7 1,956 -79.0 Ground Transportation Paid Parked Cars 168,554 -10.5 937,956 -11.7 1,967,853 -9.4 Ground Transpo.Counter Passengers 11,405 -19.1 65,725 -22.5 132,761 -13.4 Airport Coach Passengers 37,000 -31.1 186,174 -10.5 390,968 -6.6 Taxis Dispatched 324,894 -2.0 1,898,376 2.3 3,769,281 -0.2 Air Transport Association Carriers (USA) Passengers:Domestic Enplaned (000) 44,217 2.3 243,391 1.2 486,615 1.5 Passengers:International Enplaned (000) 6,384 2.3
    [Show full text]
  • The Unfriendly Skies
    The Unfriendly Skies Five Years of Airline Passenger Complaints to the Department of Transportation The Unfriendly Skies Five Years of Airline Passenger Complaints to the Department of Transportation Laura Murray U.S. PIRG Education Fund April 2014 Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Kendall Creighton and Paul Hudson of FlyersRights.org for their expert review of this report. Additionally, thank you to Ed Mierzwinski, U.S. PIRG Education Fund Federal Consumer Program Director, for his expertise and guidance in developing this report, and to my intern Julia Christensen for her research assistance. U.S. PIRG Education Fund thanks the Colston Warne Program of Consumers Union for making this report possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of U.S. PIRG Education Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. 2014 U.S. PIRG Education Fund. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License. To view the terms of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursuing their own nar- row agendas, U.S. PIRG Education Fund offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public in- terest. U.S. PIRG Education Fund, a 501(c)(3) organization, works to protect consumers and promote good government. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public and offer Americans meaningful opportunities for civic participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit Airlines, Inc
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. Issued by the Department of Transportation on May 5, 2020 NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET DOT-OST-2020-0037 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation (Secretary) to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020 (Service Obligation). By Order 2020-4-2, the U.S. Department of Transportation established the parameters for implementation of the authority granted to the Secretary under the CARES Act, including an exemption process as described at pages 9-10 and in Appendix D of that order. This serves as notice to the public of an action taken by a Department official with regard to exemption(s) from Order 2020-4-2. No additional confirming order will be issued in this matter. Applicant: Spirit Airlines, Inc. (Spirit) 1. XX Service Level Exemption (large hub)1 Date Filed: April 27, 2020 In its April 27, 2020 request for exemption, Spirit Airlines requests that the Department approve a temporary suspension of service to the following covered points from its Service Obligation under the provisions of Order 2020- 4-2: (1) Charlotte, NC (4) Phoenix, AZ (2) Denver, CO (5) Portland, OR (3) Minneapolis/St.
    [Show full text]