The Unfriendly Skies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Unfriendly Skies The Unfriendly Skies Five Years of Airline Passenger Complaints to the Department of Transportation The Unfriendly Skies Five Years of Airline Passenger Complaints to the Department of Transportation Laura Murray U.S. PIRG Education Fund April 2014 Acknowledgements The author would like to thank Kendall Creighton and Paul Hudson of FlyersRights.org for their expert review of this report. Additionally, thank you to Ed Mierzwinski, U.S. PIRG Education Fund Federal Consumer Program Director, for his expertise and guidance in developing this report, and to my intern Julia Christensen for her research assistance. U.S. PIRG Education Fund thanks the Colston Warne Program of Consumers Union for making this report possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of U.S. PIRG Education Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. 2014 U.S. PIRG Education Fund. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License. To view the terms of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursuing their own nar- row agendas, U.S. PIRG Education Fund offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public in- terest. U.S. PIRG Education Fund, a 501(c)(3) organization, works to protect consumers and promote good government. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public and offer Americans meaningful opportunities for civic participation. For more information, please visit our website at www.uspirgedfund.org. Cover photo Peter Dutton/Flickr. Design by Alec Meltzer, meltzerdesign.net. Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................1 Introduction: Airlines Then and Now ...................................................3 Five Years of Air Travel Complaints ......................................................5 Comparing Complaints to On-Time Performance .................................8 Which Airlines Consumers Complain About .........................................9 Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................15 Methodology ....................................................................................16 Appendix: Complaints and Enplanements by Airline, 2009-2013 .......17 Notes ...............................................................................................21 Executive Summary onsolidation in the airline industry, pressures these consumer complaints about U.S. air carriers created by new security rules, and the recent for the five year period from 2009-2013, evaluates Chigh cost of aviation gasoline have changed the effectiveness of new regulations and compares the way we fly. It seems as if every consumer has airlines’ performance. an airline problem story—how they were trapped This report tracks trends in tens of thousands on the tarmac, tricked by fees, missed their con- of consumer complaints over time, finding how nection, or lost their bag. some airlines have improved their rankings and What many consumers don’t know is that they others have worsened. We also compare consumer have a number of new rights as well as a right to complaint data with other DOT data that tracks complain, both to the airline and to the govern- airlines’ on-time performance and baggage han- ment. dling. For over a decade, the Department of Trans- The report finds that consumers’ greatest portation (DOT) has collected data on consumer numbers of complaints were about Flight Prob- complaints about air travel. This report analyzes lems, such as delays and cancellations. Other top Complaints by Category 40% 35% FLIGHT PROBLEMS 30% OVERSALES RES/TKTG/BOARDING 25% FARES 20% REFUNDS 15% BAGGAGE CUSTOMER SERVICE 10% DISABILITY 5% % of total complaints about U.S. airlines 0% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Executive Summary 1 problems were about baggage, customer service, Among other recommendations, the report and issues with reservations, bookings, and board- recommends the following: ing. Over time, Flight Problems account for an increasing portion of the total complaints. • That the Department of Transportation The airline that generated the most com- (DOT) establish a searchable public database plaints relative to number of passengers was Spirit of consumer airline complaints to supplement Airlines. Each year, Spirit’s passengers were about its monthly summary reports. three times as likely to file a complaint as the • That the DOT move more of its air travel da- second-place airline, and its complaints volume tabases onto the machine-readable data.gov is trending upward over time. Southwest Airlines platform. generated the lowest number of complaints rela- • That policymakers provide funding for the tive to number of passengers each year. unfunded air passenger consumer complaint U.S. PIRG Education Fund’s experience with hotline established in 2012. other government agencies and their consumer • That the DOT require airlines to report com- complaint processes is that greater transparency plaint data about frequent flyer programs and public education—including the establish- separately so that it can be added to the data ment of a searchable public database of com- that are available in DOT reports and in the plaints—leads to greater compliance by regulated future searchable public consumer complaint firms and improved customer service. database. Complaints by Airline 10 AIRTRAN AIRWAYS 9 ALASKA AIRLINES AMERICAN AIRLINES 8 AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES 7 DELTA AIR LINES 6 FRONTIER AIRLINES 5 JETBLUE AIRWAYS 4 PINNACLE AIRLINES SKYWEST AIRLINES 3 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 2 SPIRIT AIRLINES Complaints per 100,000 enplanements 1 UNITED AIRLINES 0 US AIRWAYS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2 The Unfriendly Skies Introduction: Airlines Then and Now n recent years, consumer frustration about air- pacity of equipment and flight crews have been lines has grown. Airlines are merging, leaving allowed to lapse. Rules that allowed passengers Ipassengers with fewer quality options for air on significantly delayed or canceled flights to use travel and crowding air traffic at unavoidable hubs. their ticket on another airline’s flight at no addi- This report examines air travel complaints filed tional cost are gone1, as are regulations requiring with the Department of Transportation. other airlines to honor a bankrupt airline’s tickets. Congress deregulated the airline industry in Increases in flight delays of over one hour 1978. That action democratized air travel and also grew dramatically following deregulation. opened competition to new entrants but disrupted This situation not only inconveniences, stresses a system that had been characterized for years by and results in hardship for airline passengers, but ever-greater reliability. The government approved also burdens airlines and the entire economy. The flight schedules, air fares, conditions and standards U.S. economy depends upon safe, convenient, rel- of service. The Federal Aviation Administration atively low cost air travel, as this is the primary and (FAA) controlled the number of flights at major often only means of long distance transportation. airports which prevented congestion. Aircraft With the latest wave of consolidation, airfares were placed in service each decade that were faster declined about 50% from 1980 to 2009, but have and more reliable, flight crews were better paid increased rapidly since 2010 especially when fees and had arguably higher standards of training and and taxes are included. 2 experience. Finally, airport capacity increases and additions in the 1950s through the 1960s kept up In the past decade, the landscape with increased air traffic. has shifted in U.S. air travel: For a period, deregulation resulted in lower Security risks, the price of aviation gasoline and prices and offered reasonably-priced air travel to reduced competition due to mergers between new, smaller cities. But since 1978, there has been major airlines have led to airlines hitting con- no net increase in major US airports, so the skies sumers with heavy fees on top of rising fares. around major cities such as New York and Chicago Two checked bags, basic meals and snacks, car- have become more and more congested. Further, ry-ons, and, often, in-flight entertainment were the deregulated airlines have discontinued the formerly included in the price of your ticket, but use of large jets in favor of more frequent flights now add-on fees for each of these newly a la carte with narrow bodied planes and regional jets, of- items can easily add $100 or more to the cost of ten flown by smaller “feeder” partners, carrying a one-way ticket.3 Passengers seeking an aisle or 20 to 140 passengers, thereby negating the prin- front-of-the-economy-cabin seat, or even just a cipal strategy for increasing airport capacity. More confirmed seat when booking their ticket, also recently, regular service to many of those smaller now pay extra, as do passengers seeking to use cities has been limited or even discontinued. entertainment offerings, on most carriers. This Regulations requiring minimum reserve ca- Introduction: Airlines Then and Now 3 shift has led to limited space for carry-ons and a which merged with Continental Airlines; South- slowed down boarding process as passengers at- west Airlines,
Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 0-14719 SKYWEST, INC. Incorporated under the Laws of Utah 87-0292166 (IRS Employer ID No.) 444 South River Road St. George, Utah 84790 (435) 634-3000 Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Trading Symbol(s) Name of Each Exchange on which Registered Common Stock, No Par Value SKYW The Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Law Review
    Aviation Law Review Sixth Edition Editor Sean Gates lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd Aviation law Review Sixth Edition Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd This article was first published in August 2018 For further information please contact [email protected] Editor Sean Gates lawreviews © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Tom Barnes SENIOR BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGERS Thomas Lee, Joel Woods SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGER Pere Aspinall ACCOUNT MANAGERS Sophie Emberson, Jack Bagnall PRODUCT MARKETING EXECUTIVE Rebecca Mogridge RESEARCHER Keavy Hunnigal-Gaw EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Hannah Higgins HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Tessa Brummitt SUBEDITOR Gina Mete CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Paul Howarth Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2018 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as of July 2018, be advised that this is a developing area. Enquiries concerning reproduction should be sent to Law Business
    [Show full text]
  • Skywest, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2020 Results
    NEWS RELEASE CONTACT: Investor Relations Corporate Communications 435.634.3200 435.634.3553 [email protected] [email protected] SkyWest, Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2020 Results Second Quarter Results • Net loss of $26 million, pre-tax loss of $33 million, or $0.51 loss per share • SkyWest took delivery of 21 used E175 aircraft under a previously-announced agreement with United Airlines • SkyWest took delivery of two new E175 aircraft and three used E175 aircraft under a previously-announced agreement with Delta Air Lines ST. GEORGE, UTAH, July 30, 2020 -- SkyWest, Inc. (NASDAQ: SKYW) (“SkyWest”) today reported financial and operating results for Q2 2020, including net loss of $26 million, or $0.51 per share, compared to net income of $88 million, or $1.71 per diluted share, for Q2 2019. The primary factor in SkyWest’s lower results in Q2 2020 compared to Q2 2019 was reduced flight schedules and lower demand resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Commenting on the results, Chip Childs, Chief Executive Officer of SkyWest, said, “COVID-19 continues to cause unprecedented disruption across the airline industry. The safety and well- being of our people and passengers remains our main focus. Maintaining strong liquidity and working collaboratively with our partners are our other priorities. I want to thank our 14,000 employees for their dedication to our passengers, each other and our mission during this pandemic.” Financial Results Revenue was $350 million in Q2 2020, down from $744 million in Q2 2019, due to the COVID- 1 19 pandemic that caused a significant reduction in the number of scheduled flights SkyWest operated under its flying contracts compared to the same period last year.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2017 Master Schedule (Pdf)
    GENERAL MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Master Schedule ‐ All Airlines September 2017 AA ‐ American Airlines / American Eagle: Air Wisconsin (AA9), PSA Airlines (AAA), SkyWest Airlines (AA4) AC ‐ Air Canada / Air Canada Express: Air Georgian (AC2) AS ‐ Alaska Airlines / Skywest Airlines (AS1) DL ‐ Delta Air Lines / Delta Connection: Endeavor Air (DL3), ExpressJet (DL7), Shuttle America (DL4), Skywest Airlines (DL F9 ‐ Frontier Airlines UA ‐ United Airlines / United Express: CommutAir (UAC), ExpressJet (UA1), Republic (UAR), Skywest Airlines (UA3), Trans VTE ‐ OneJet / operated by Corporate Flight Management WN ‐ Southwest Airlines Y4 ‐ Volaris Arrival Depart Equip Seats Per Days Flown Airline FlightFrom Time Time To Type Aircraft (1 = Monday) Concourse WN 3164 LAS 00:05 73H 175 1 C WN 6174 SNA LAS 00:05 73W 143 23456 C WN 1182 SAN PHX 00:10 73W 143 23456 C Y4 657 00:32 GDL 320 174 6 C WN 1746 05:20 PHX OAK 73H 175 12345 C F9 435 05:30 DEN 320 180 1234567 D WN 1943 05:30 DEN SAN 73W 143 12345 C DL2 4528 05:35 DTW CR9 76 12345 7 D DL2 4528 05:37 DTW CR9 76 6 D AA6 4478 05:39 CLT E75 76 1234567 D WN 1236 05:50 LGA ATL 73W 143 12345 C AA4 3117 05:50 ORD CRJ 50 12345 7 D UA3 5545 05:50 ORD E7W 70 1234567 C WN 3077 05:55 DEN PDX 73H 175 6 C WN 1902 06:00 LAS SLC 73H 175 12345 C WN 4042 06:00 DEN SNA 73W 143 7 C DL3 4056 06:00 LGA CR9 76 12345 D DL2 4998 06:00 CVG CRJ 50 12345 D DL 2085 06:02 ATL 738 160 6 D UA1 4365 06:05 CLE ERJ 50 12345 C WN 5981 06:05 MCO MSY 73W 143 12345 C DL 2085 06:07 ATL 738 160 12345 7 D WN 2518 06:10 PHX 73H 175 6
    [Show full text]
  • Five-Star Le Champlain
    Voyage aboard the Exclusively Chartered, Small Ship Five-Star Le Champlain May 30 to June 7, 2020 Dear Alumni and Friends: Across the mist-enshrouded peaks and hauntingly beautiful glens of Scotland to the unsurmounted natural beauty of Norway’s mighty fjords, the legacies of Viking and Celtic clans are entwined in each civilizations’ rich cultural traditions and compelling archaeological heritage. This singular, custom-designed itinerary traces the cultural crossroads of Nordic and Scottish civilizations during the best time of year, when the weather is mild and the days are long—a voyage accomplished only aboard a small ship cruising into smaller ports where larger vessels cannot venture. Cruise for seven nights aboard the exclusively chartered, Five-Star Le Champlain, featuring only 92 Suites and Staterooms, each with private balcony. Cruise from dynamic Glasgow to charming Bergen, where rows of colorful, gabled houses on the historic Bryggen waterfront evoke the city’s past. Traverse the lands of the Scottish Highlands where granite mountains loom over emerald pastures and misty expanses of golden bracken and heather. In historic Glencoe, trace the emotive legacy of the famous Clan Donald. Visit the hamlet of Glenfinnan, where the centuries-old Gaelic language is still spoken and its magnificent 21-arch viaduct speaks to Scotland’s engineering prowess. Immerse yourself in the Norse history of the Shetland Islands, a subarctic archipelago with remarkable archaeological sites, including the Bronze Age relics of Jarlshof. View the untamed shorelines, serrated sea stacks and crystal-clear waters of the Orkney Islands and learn more about the islands’ fascinating Neolithic history from renowned archaeology expert Nick Card.
    [Show full text]
  • A Collapsing Banana Industry Dependence, Vulnerability, Insecurity and Uncertainty in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
    A collapsing banana industry Dependence, vulnerability, insecurity and uncertainty in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Picture from my own collection Masterthesis International Development Studies Wageningen University and Research Centre Renate de Waard 911104923040 22-12-2017 Information A collapsing banana industry: Dependence, vulnerability, insecurity and uncertainty in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Supervisors: Joost Jongerden (RSO) and Gerard Verschoor (SDC) Student: Renate de Waard, 911104923040 [email protected] Master International Development Studies Sociology of Development and Change 2 Preface After a really long time, my thesis is finally finished. There were many moments wherein I thought I could not do it. It was a long and hard process, and I learned a lot. Not only about doing research, but also about myself. I had never done fieldwork abroad before. My previous research projects in my bachelor and my master consisted of qualitative research with data collected through a number of interviews. I recorded the interviews, transcribed them, linked the data to the theoretical framework and rounded it off with a conclusion and a discussion. Such a process is also not a piece of cake, however I had never imagined how difficult this master thesis research would be: to do fieldwork abroad, in a country I had never been before, with the idea of ‘I will research the local population in an inductive way’. Sure, of course I thought it would be difficult, but I could not have imagined it would be the hardest thing I have ever done. So in the end, I am really happy to be able to present this thesis and I am grateful for this opportunity to learn so much.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999
    9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 171 Appendix C Informal Complaints to DOT by New Entrant Airlines About Unfair Exclusionary Practices March 1993 to May 1999 UNFAIR PRICING AND CAPACITY RESPONSES 1. Date Raised: May 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Northwest Airlines Description: AccessAir, a new airline headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, began service in the New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles to Mo- line/Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois, markets. Northwest offers connecting service in these markets. AccessAir alleged that Northwest was offering fares in these markets that were substantially below Northwest’s costs. 171 9310-08 App C 10/12/99 13:40 Page 172 172 ENTRY AND COMPETITION IN THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY 2. Date Raised: March 1999 Complaining Party: AccessAir Complained Against: Delta, Northwest, and TWA Description: AccessAir was a new entrant air carrier, headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa. In February 1999, AccessAir began service to New York–LaGuardia and Los Angeles from Des Moines, Iowa, and Moline/ Quad Cities/Peoria, Illinois. AccessAir offered direct service (nonstop or single-plane) between these points, while competitors generally offered connecting service. In the Des Moines/Moline–Los Angeles market, Ac- cessAir offered an introductory roundtrip fare of $198 during the first month of operation and then planned to raise the fare to $298 after March 5, 1999. AccessAir pointed out that its lowest fare of $298 was substantially below the major airlines’ normal 14- to 21-day advance pur- chase fares of $380 to $480 per roundtrip and was less than half of the major airlines’ normal 7-day advance purchase fare of $680.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel Consumer Report
    Air Travel Consumer Report A Product Of THE OFFICE OF AVIATION CONSUMER PROTECTION Issued: August 2021 Flight Delays1 June 2021 January - June 2021 Mishandled Baggage, Wheelchairs, and Scooters 1 June 2021 January -June 2021 Oversales1 2nd Quarter 2021 Consumer Complaints2 June 2021 (Includes Disability and January - June 2021 Discrimination Complaints) Airline Animal Incident Reports4 June 2021 Customer Service Reports to 3 the Dept. of Homeland Security June 2021 1 Data collected by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Website: http://www.bts.gov 2 Data compiled by the Office of Aviation Consumer Protection. Website: http://www.transportation.gov/airconsumer 3 Data provided by the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration 4 Data collected by the Office of Aviation Consumer Protection. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page Flight Delays Flight Delays (continued) Introduction 3 Table 8 35 Explanation 4 List of Regularly Scheduled Domestic Flights with Tarmac Delays Over 3 Hours, By Marketing/Operating Carrier Branded Codeshare Partners 5 Table 8A Table 1 6 List of Regularly Scheduled International Flights with 36 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Tarmac Delays Over 4 Hours, By Marketing/Operating Carrier Operations Arriving On-Time, by Reporting Marketing Carrier Appendix 37 Table 1A 7 Mishandled Baggage Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking- by Marketing Carrier (Monthly) 39 Operations Arriving On-Time, by Reporting Operating Carrier Ranking- by Marketing Carrier (YTD) 40 Table 1B 8
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Flight Statistics Report For
    DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TOTAL OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC March 2014 March YEAR TO DATE % of % of % Grand % Grand Incr./ Incr./ Total Incr./ Incr./ Total 2014 2013 Decr. Decr. 2014 2014 2013 Decr. Decr. 2014 OPERATIONS (1) Air Carrier 36,129 35,883 246 0.7% 74.2% 99,808 101,345 (1,537) -1.5% 73.5% Air Taxi 12,187 13,754 (1,567) -11.4% 25.0% 34,884 38,400 (3,516) -9.2% 25.7% General Aviation 340 318 22 6.9% 0.7% 997 993 4 0.4% 0.7% Military 15 1 14 1400.0% 0.0% 18 23 (5) -21.7% 0.0% TOTAL 48,671 49,956 (1,285) -2.6% 100.0% 135,707 140,761 (5,054) -3.6% 100.0% PASSENGERS (2) International (3) Inbound 68,615 58,114 10,501 18.1% 176,572 144,140 32,432 22.5% Outbound 70,381 56,433 13,948 24.7% 174,705 137,789 36,916 26.8% TOTAL 138,996 114,547 24,449 21.3% 3.1% 351,277 281,929 69,348 24.6% 2.8% International/Pre-cleared Inbound 42,848 36,668 6,180 16.9% 121,892 102,711 19,181 18.7% Outbound 48,016 39,505 8,511 21.5% 132,548 108,136 24,412 22.6% TOTAL 90,864 76,173 14,691 19.3% 2.0% 254,440 210,847 43,593 20.7% 2.1% Majors (4) Inbound 1,698,200 1,685,003 13,197 0.8% 4,675,948 4,662,021 13,927 0.3% Outbound 1,743,844 1,713,061 30,783 1.8% 4,724,572 4,700,122 24,450 0.5% TOTAL 3,442,044 3,398,064 43,980 1.3% 75.7% 9,400,520 9,362,143 38,377 0.4% 75.9% National (5) Inbound 50,888 52,095 (1,207) -2.3% 139,237 127,899 11,338 8.9% Outbound 52,409 52,888 (479) -0.9% 139,959 127,940 12,019 9.4% TOTAL 103,297 104,983 (1,686) -1.6% 2.3% 279,196 255,839 23,357 9.1% 2.3% Regionals (6) Inbound 382,759 380,328 2,431 0.6% 1,046,306 1,028,865 17,441 1.7% Outbound
    [Show full text]
  • THE Baggage Report
    2013 AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY INSIGHTS THE Baggage report In association with PREFACE SITA’s ninth annual Baggage Report shows a continued There is already a strong momentum to reduce mishandling improvement in the baggage mishandling rates of the further. As an industry, we are collaboratively addressing the industry. The headline figure has now dropped to 8.83 issues and developing the solutions. IATA’s InBag program mishandled bags per 1,000 passengers, down from 8.99 has set a target to reduce the global baggage mishandling in 2011 and represents a drop of 44.5% in the number of rate to 4.5 mishandled bags per thousand passengers. It is mishandled bags in the last six years. Remarkably, given a figure that is nearly half of where we are today, so there is the nearly three billion passengers using the air transport still much work to do. While it is challenging, SITA is working system last year, it means that for every hundred passengers with its industry partners, including IATA and the ACI, to make traveling fewer than one bag was reported as mishandled. it happen. For the industry it translates into an annual cost saving of US$2.1 billion for 2012. We are now seeing the rewards of a concerted collaborative effort to improve the baggage handling operations of the industry and in so doing reducing a major cause of passenger Francesco Violante dissatisfaction. Delayed baggage, which was responsible for Chief Executive Officer, SITA 82.9% of mishandling, fell 2.4% in 2012 to 5.67 per thousand passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE CONTACT: Investor Relations Corporate Communications 435.634.3200 435.634.3553 [email protected] [email protected] SkyWest, Inc. Reports Combined February 2018 Traffic for SkyWest Airlines and ExpressJet Airlines ST. GEORGE, UT, March 8, 2018 – SkyWest, Inc., (NASDAQ: SKYW) (“SkyWest”) today reported 135,000 block hours in February 2018, compared to 137,100 block hours in February 2017, a decrease of 2,100 or 1.6%. The net decrease was consistent with SkyWest’s fleet transition plan to improve the mix of aircraft in its fleet by adding new E175 aircraft, while reducing its 50-seat jets. The year-over-year net change was primarily driven by approximately 6,000 additional block hours from its E175 aircraft and a decrease of approximately 8,100 block hours from its other aircraft types. In February 2018, SkyWest’s dual class aircraft represented approximately 52% of SkyWest’s total block hour production for the month compared to approximately 48% for the month of February 2017. SkyWest reported 282,700 block hours for year-to-date February 2018, compared to 290,800 block hours year-to-date February 2017, a decrease of 8,100, or 2.8%. This net change was primarily driven by approximately 13,200 additional block hours from its E175 aircraft and a decrease of approximately 21,300 block hours from its other aircraft types. SkyWest had 76,100 departures in February 2018 compared to 80,400 in February 2017, a decrease of 4,300, or 5.4%. Additional flight statistics for February are included in the accompanying table.
    [Show full text]