DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Sources and Translations Albeck, Ch. ( ed.), ;rn1.n:i ,,,o :iww, 6 vols., Jerusalem/Tel Aviv 1952-1958. Berman, S., Midrash Tanhuma-Yelammedenu, Hoboken (NJ) 1996 (translation). Buber, S. (ed.), Midrash Tan/:iuma, 2 vols., Vilna 1885 (= Jerusalem 1964). -. Midrash Tehilim, Vilna 1891. -. Midrash Samuel, Krakow 1893. -. Midrash Echa Rabbati; Sammlung agadischer Auslegungen der Klagelieder, Vilna 1899. -. Aggadat Bereshit, Krakow 1903 (= New York 1973). Di Lonzano, M., l111"T11V, Venice 1618. Dunski, S., Midrash Rabbah. Shir ha Shirim, Jerusalem 1980 H.G. Enelow (ed.), Menorat ha-Meor by R. Israel ibn Al-Nakawa (From a unique manuscript in the Bodleian Library), New York 1929. 4 volumes. Gidul Banim in volume 4. Epstein, J., e.a. (eds.), The Babylonian Talmud, 34 vols., London 1935-1952 (Soncino edition and translation). Finkelstein, L., Siphre ad Deuteronomium, Berlin 1939 (repr. Jerusalem 1970-1 ). Friedlander, G. (ed.), Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer, London 1916 (translation). Friedmann, M. (ed.), Pesikta Rabbati, Midrash fiir den Fest Cyclus und die ausgezeichnete Sabbathe, Vienna 1880. H.S. Horovitz (ed.), Sifre d'be Rab. Siphre ad Numeros adjecto Siphre Zutta, Jerusalem 1966. Hyman, D., Lerrer, D & Shiloni, I. (eds.), Yalkut Shim 'oni al ha-Torah le Rabbenu Shim 'on ha-Darshan, 9 vols., Jerusalem 1973-91. Jellinek, A. (ed.), IV11b:i T1'~/Bet ha-Midrasch. Sammlung kleiner Midrashim und vermischter Abhandlungen aus der a/tern jiidischen Literatur, 6 vols., Leipzig 1853-57 (= Jerusalem 3 1967 ). (Aggadat Bereshit is included in vol. 4.) Klein, M.L. (ed.), The Fragment-Targums of the Pentateuch According to their Extant Sources, Vol. I, Rome 1980. Lauterbach, J .Z. ( ed.), Mekilta deRabbi Ishmael, 3 vols., Philadelphia 1933-1935. Lieberman, S. (ed.), Midrash Debarim Rabbah, Edited for the First Time from the Oxford Ms.no. I 47, with an Introduction and Notes, Jerusalem 1974. Mandelbaum, B. (ed.), Pesikta deRav Kahana, According to an Oxford Manuscript with Variants from All Known Manuscripts and Genizah Fragments and Parallel Passages; with Commentary and Introduction, 2 vols., New York 1962. Margulies, M. (ed.), Midrash Wayyikra Rabbah; a Critical Edition Based on Manuscripts and Genizah Fragments with Variants and Notes, 5 vols., Jerusalem 1953-1960. Midrash Tanf:iuma, Jerusalem 1960. Mirkin, A. (ed.), Midrash Rabbah, 11 vols., Tel Aviv 1956-1967. Schechter, S. (ed.), Aboth de Rabbi Nathan, edited from Manuscripts with an Introduction, Notes and Appendices, second revised edition, Hildesheim 1979. Talmud Jerushalmi, Krotochin 1866 (repr. Jerusalem 1969). Tanakh. A New Translation of the Holy Scriptures According to the Traditional Hebrew Text, The Jewish Publication Society, Philadelphia & Jerusalem 1985. The Holy Bible. New Revised Standard Version, New York & Oxford 1989. Theodor, J & Albeck, Ch. (eds.), Bereschit Rabba mil kritischem Apparat und Kommentar, 3 vols., Jerusalem 1965. Townsend, J.T., Midrash Tanhuma (S. Buber Recension), 2 vols., Hoboken 1989-1997 (translation). Vidas, Elijah ben Moses de, Reshit Jjokhmah, Venice 1579 (later edition: Chemovitz 1859). Visotzky, B., Midrash Mishle, New York 1990. -. The Midrash on Proverbs. Translated from the Hebrew with an Introduction and Annotations, New Haven & London 1992. Wertheimer, S.A. (ed.), Batei Midrashot, 2 vols., second edition, Jerusalem 1968. Dictionaries and Reference Works Bacher, W., Die exegetische Terminologie der jiidischen Traditionsliteratur. 2 vols., Leipzig 1899-1905. Brown, F., Driver, S.R. & Briggs, C.A., The New Brown-Driver-Briggs-Gesenius Hebrew and English Lexicon, Peabody (Ma) 1979. EncyclopaediaJudaica (E.J.), 16 vols., Jerusalem 1971. Even-Shoshan, A., w,nn T171Jii, 6 vols., Jerusalem 1979. Ginzberg, L., The Legends ofthe Jews, 7 vols., Philadelphia 1909-38. Jastrow, M., A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Bavli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature, 2 vols., London 1886-1903 (reprint New York 1950). Koehler, L. & Baumgartner, W., The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, 4 vols., Leiden 1994-1999. Kohut, A. (ed.), Aruch Completum by Nathan ben Yehiell c',wn 71,x, 8 vols., Vienna 1926. -. Additamenta ad Aruch Completum. ed. S. Krauss, Vienna 1937. Krauss, S., Griechische und Lateinische Lehnworter im Talmud, Midrasch und Targum, 2 vols., Berlin 1889 (= reprint Hildesheim 1987). Levy, J., Neuhebriiisches und chaldiiisches Worterbuch iiber die Talmudim und Midraschim, 4 vols., Leipzig 1876-89. Sternberger, G., Introduction to the Talmud and Midrash, second edition, Edinburgh 1996. Strack, H.L. & Billerbeck, P., Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch, 5 vols., Munich 1922-1928. Trapp, E. et al. (eds), Lexikon zur Byzantinischen Graezitaet besonders des 9.-12. Jahrhunderts, 3. vols., Vienna 1994-1999. 266 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • La Mitzva De Vivir En Eretz Israel 1
    BS’D La Mitzvá de vivir en Eretz Israel מצות ישוב ארץ ישראל LAS ENSEÑANZAS DE NUESTROS SABIOS ACERCA DEL MANDAMIENTO Y DE NUESTRA OBLIGACIÓN MORAL DE VIVIR EN ERETZ ISRAEL “Vivir en Eretz Israel es el equivalente de todas las Mitzvot de la Torá.” (Sifre, Parashat Ree, Tosefta Avoda Zara 5) “Uno siempre debe vivir en Eretz Israel, incluso en una ciudad donde la mayoría sean idólatras, y no en Jutz la Aretz, aun en una ciudad donde la mayoría sean Judíos ya que el que vive en Eretz Israel es como alguien que tiene un dios y aquel que vive fuera de Eretz Israel es como alguien que no tiene un dios.” (Talmud Ketuvot 110) INSTITUTO BEIT YOSEF, BEER SHEVA, ERETZ ISRAEL 5765 “No hay amor como el amor por Eretz Israel” (Bamidbar Rabá 23:7). “No hay Torá como la Torá de Eretz Israel” (Bereshit Rabá 16, 7). “El aire de Eretz Israel lo hace a uno sabio” (Bava Batra 158b). “Hay 10 medidas de Torá en el mundo. 9 están en Eretz Israel y 1 en el resto del mundo”. (Ester Rabá 1). “No hay mayor derogación de la Torá (Bitul Torá) que [la que se produjo] cuando los Judíos fueron exilados de su lugar.” (Talmud Babli Jaguigá 5b). "Si deseais ver la presencia de la Shejiná en este mundo, entonces estudiad Torá en Eretz Israel." (Midrash Tehilim 105) “Es preferible vivir en los desiertos de Eretz Israel que en los palacios de jutz laAretz.” (Bereshit Rabá 39:8). “Ha Kaddosh Baruj Hu Dijo: “Un grupo pequeño en Eretz Israel Me es más querido que un Sanedrín pleno fuera de La Tierra”.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Meer Der Halacha: Der Talmud Ist Wie Das Große Meer Shirr 5,20
    Das Meer der Halacha: Der Talmud ist wie das große Meer ShirR 5,20 1 Traktat Avot, Kapitel 1 מסכת אבות פרק א 1,1 א (א) Mose empfing Tora vom Sinai משה קבל תורה מסיני, und übergab sie Josua ומסרה ליהושע, (שמות יח, במדבר יא) und Josua den Ältesten ויהושע לזקנים, und Älteste Propheten וזקנים לנביאים, .und Propheten übergaben sie den Leuten der Großen Versammlung ונביאים מסרוה לאנשי כנסת הגדולה. :Die sagte drei Dinge הם אמרו שלשה דברים, (Seid geduldig/abwartend/moderat/gemäßigt im Gericht(sprozeß (1) הוו מתונים בדין, und stellt viele Schüler auf (2) והעמידו תלמידים הרבה, .und macht einen Zaun für die Tora (3) ועשו סיג לתורה: 1,2 א (ב) Simëon der Gerechte שמעון הצדיק .war von den Übrigen der großen Versammlung היה משירי כנסת הגדולה. :Er pflegte zu sagen הוא היה אומר, :Auf drei Dingen steht die Welt על שלשה דברים העולם עומד, auf der Tora (1) על התורה und auf dem Dienst/der Liturgie (2) ועל העבודה .und auf frommer Wohltat (3) ועל גמילות חסדים: 2 Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol. 5, col. 635f Literaturüberblick auf einem Blatt 3 1 Überblick über die Traditionsliteratur Überblick über die Traditionsliteratur 1. Bibel 2. Mischna, Tosefta und Baraita 3. Gemara a) des Westens, Babyloniens, der Exilsgemeinde b) des Ostens, Jerusalems, des Landes Israel 4. Midrasch 5. Responsen 6. Liturgie-Bücher: Siddur und Machsor 7. Halacha-Kompendien: a) Talmudparaphrase (Rif, Rabbi Isaak al-Fasi, 1013–1103) b) Mizwot-Sammlungen (SeMaG, SeMaK – Sefer Mitzwot Gadol/Katan) c) Mischne Tora (Maimonides, RaMBaM, Rabbi Mose Ben Maimon, 1135–1204) d) Tur (Baal ha-Turim, Jakob ben Ascher, 1270–1340) e) Bet Josef, Schulchan Aruch (Josef Karo, 1488–1575) f) Mappa (RaMa/ReMa/ReMo/ReMu, Rabbi Mose ben Israel/Mose Isserles, 1525–1572) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Targum Song of Songs and Midrash Rabbah Song of Songs
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TARGUM SONG OF SONGS AND MIDRASH RABBAH SONG OF SONGS Volume I of II A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2010 PENELOPE ROBIN JUNKERMANN SCHOOL OF ARTS, HISTORIES, AND CULTURES TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME ONE TITLE PAGE ............................................................................................................ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................. 2 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. 6 DECLARATION ........................................................................................................ 7 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ....................................................................................... 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DEDICATION ............................................................... 9 CHAPTER ONE : INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 11 1.1 The Research Question: Targum Song and Song Rabbah ......................... 11 1.2 The Traditional View of the Relationship of Targum and Midrash ........... 11 1.2.1 Targum Depends on Midrash .............................................................. 11 1.2.2 Reasons for Postulating Dependency .................................................. 14 1.2.2.1 Ambivalence of Rabbinic Sources Towards Bible Translation .... 14 1.2.2.2 The Traditional
    [Show full text]
  • Vayeishev 5758 Volume V Number 12
    Balak 5781 Volume XXVIII Number 41 Toras Aish Thoughts From Across the Torah Spectrum and Midian, suffered a self-inflicted tragedy by allowing RABBI LORD JONATHAN SACKS Z"L themselves to be enticed by the women of the land. Covenant & Conversation God’s anger burns against them. Several chapters later Rabbi Sacks zt"l had prepared a full year of Covenant & (Num. 31:16) it emerges that it was Bilaam who Conversation for 5781, based on his book Lessons in devised this strategy: “They were the ones who Leadership. The Office of Rabbi Sacks will continue to followed Bilaam’s advice and were the means of turning distribute these weekly essays, so that people all around the the Israelites away from the Lord in what happened at world can keep on learning and finding inspiration in his Peor, so that a plague struck the Lord’s people”. Having Torah. failed to curse the Israelites, Bilaam eventually s leadership a set of skills, the ability to summon and succeeded in doing them great harm. command power? Or does it have an essentially I So the picture that emerges from the Jewish moral dimension also? Can a bad person be a good sources is of a man with great gifts, a genuine prophet, leader, or will their badness compromise their a man whom the Sages compared with Moses himself leadership? That is the question raised by the key – yet at the same time a figure of flawed character that figure in this week’s parsha, the pagan prophet Bilaam. eventually led to his downfall and to his reputation as First, by way of introduction, we have an evil-doer and one of those mentioned by the independent evidence that Bilaam actually existed.
    [Show full text]
  • David C. Flatto
    THE TIKVAH CENTER FOR LAW & JEWISH CIVILIZATION Professor Moshe Halbertal Professor J.H.H. Weiler Directors of The Tikvah Center Tikvah Working Paper 08/12 David C. Flatto Justice Retold: The Trial of the Judean King, and the Narration of Legal Myths NYU School of Law • New York, NY 10011 The Tikvah Center Working Paper Series can be found at http://www.nyutikvah.org/publications.html All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. ISSN 2160‐8229 (print) ISSN 2160‐8253 (online) Copy Editor: Danielle Leeds Kim © David C. Flatto 2012 New York University School of Law New York, NY 10011 USA Publications in the Series should be cited as: AUTHOR, TITLE, TIKVAH CENTER WORKING PAPER NO./YEAR [URL] Justice Retold JUSTICE RETOLD: THE TRIAL OF THE JUDEAN KING, AND THE NARRATION OF LEGAL MYTHS By David C. Flatto INTRODUCTION Over two decades ago the legal community lost Robert Cover, one of its most creative minds, at the far too young age of forty-two. A champion of civil rights (who became widely known with his first book “Justice Accused: Antislavery and the Judicial Process”), and a brilliant constitutional theorist, Cover’s final years yielded a flourishing of seminal articles on legal narratives.1 His “Nomos and Narrative,” “Obligation: A Jewish Jurisprudence of the Social Order,” and especially his “Folktales of Justice: Tales of Jurisdiction” focused renewed attention on the profound nature and formative role of law’s stories.2 Heeding Cover’s appeal to expand the legal canon by examining rich literary texts from the past, this article analyzes several different renditions of a profound early legal myth involving a fundamental clash between law and power (which Cover briefly studied in his “Folktales of Justice”).3 After introducing a crucial distinction between primary and secondary legal myths, this article demonstrates how the latter are especially prone to being adapted and transformed in the very process of their narration.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah Portion – Vayera
    AVODAH: The Jewish Service Corps Torah Portion – Vayera Justice and Prayer SOURCE: Teach us rabbi: If I am riding along on a donkey and the time for prayer arrives, what should I do? This is what the Sages taught: If you are riding along on a donkey and the time for prayer arrives, dismount [and pray]. And if you cannot dismount because you are distracted by worries about the safety of the money you have in your baggage, or you are afraid for your safety, pray while you are riding. Rabbi Yohanan said: We learn from this teaching that a person should be mindful and undistracted during prayer before God. Abba Shaul said when a person prays with concentration and direction (kavanah), that person’s prayers will surely be answered, as it says, You will direct their mind and You will listen to their prayer… (Psalms 10:17) And nobody had kavanah in their prayer like our Father Abraham, which we see from the fact that he said: Far be it from you to do a thing like that! (Genesis 18:25) [Midrash Tanhuma, Hayyei Sarah #1] COMMENTARY: The prooftext for Abraham’s exemplary concentration and intention during prayer – his kavanah – is unusual, since it is not a verse from a prayer, but a verse from an argument that Abraham is having with God! Here is the full context: Then God said, “The outrage of Sodom and Gomorrah is so great, and their sin is so grave! I will go down and see whether they have acted altogether according to the outcry that has reached Me; if not, I will take note.” Then the men [who were visiting Abraham] went on from there to Sodom, while Abraham remained standing before God.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tree in the Garden
    MAIER BECKER A Tree in the Garden The Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge are one and the same tree. When the verse states ‘God caused to sprout the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge’ (Gen. 2:9) it should be understood to mean, God caused to 1 sprout the Tree of Life which is also the Tree of Knowledge . R. J OSEPH KIMHI THIS COMMENT SEEMS to fly in the face of the basic details of the creation story in the Bible. In fact, it appears to contradict outright an explicit Biblical verse where God says “now (that man has eaten from the Tree of Knowledge), lest he partake from the Tree of Life as well” (3:22). 2 If the trees are one and the same, then by eating from the Tree of Knowledge man had already partaken of the Tree of Life! This essay proposes a reading of the Genesis story which provides a textual and conceptual basis for R. Kimhi’s explication, based on midrashic sources. I will suggest that R. Kimhi’s com - mentary sheds light on fundamental issues relating to man’s mortality and his relationship with God. 3 The Textual Starting Point The Bible introduces the Tree of Life stating; “God caused to sprout from the ground every tree that was pleasing to the sight and the Tree of Life betokh— within, the garden” (2:9). The text could have simply stated “the Tree of Life bagan —in the garden.” What does the word betokh , come to add? Onkelos translates the word betokh in this verse to mean bemitsiut— in the middle of the garden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Samaritan Attitude As Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim
    religions Article The Anti‑Samaritan Attitude as Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim Andreas Lehnardt Faculty of Protestant Theology, Johannes Gutenberg‑University Mainz, 55122 Mainz, Germany; lehnardt@uni‑mainz.de Abstract: Samaritans, as a group within the ranges of ancient ‘Judaisms’, are often mentioned in Talmud and Midrash. As comparable social–religious entities, they are regarded ambivalently by the rabbis. First, they were viewed as Jews, but from the end of the Tannaitic times, and especially after the Bar Kokhba revolt, they were perceived as non‑Jews, not reliable about different fields of Halakhic concern. Rabbinic writings reflect on this change in attitude and describe a long ongoing conflict and a growing anti‑Samaritan attitude. This article analyzes several dialogues betweenrab‑ bis and Samaritans transmitted in the Midrash on the book of Genesis, Bereshit Rabbah. In four larger sections, the famous Rabbi Me’ir is depicted as the counterpart of certain Samaritans. The analyses of these discussions try to show how rabbinic texts avoid any direct exegetical dispute over particular verses of the Torah, but point to other hermeneutical levels of discourse and the rejection of Samari‑ tan claims. These texts thus reflect a remarkable understanding of some Samaritan convictions, and they demonstrate how rabbis denounced Samaritanism and refuted their counterparts. The Rabbi Me’ir dialogues thus are an impressive literary witness to the final stages of the parting of ways of these diverging religious streams. Keywords: Samaritans; ancient Judaism; rabbinic literature; Talmud; Midrash Citation: Lehnardt, Andreas. 2021. The Anti‑Samaritan Attitude as 1 Reflected in Rabbinic Midrashim. The attitudes towards the Samaritans (or Kutim ) documented in rabbinical literature 2 Religions 12: 584.
    [Show full text]
  • The Binding Fragments of Midrash Tanhuma (Buber) from the Municipal Library of Trier
    CHAPTER 13 The Binding Fragments of Midrash Tanhuma (Buber) from the Municipal Library of Trier Andreas Lehnardt 1 Introduction Midrash Tanhuma, a rabbinic commentary to the Torah, is regarded as a rather late composition in comparison to the classical works of Midrash, such as the Halachic Midrashim and the Rabbot Midrashim. The manuscript used by Solomon Buber for his edition is no longer assumed to represent the earliest version of Midrash Tanhuma (“Tanhuma ha-qadum we-ha-yashan”). Although this recension seems to preserve early traditions—even from the era of the Second Temple—it is most likely that the main body of this recension has been compiled by Ashkenazic Jews (in Byzantine Italy?) in the Middle Ages.1 As has correctly been summarized by John T. Townsend, whose translations of Midrash Tanhuma are a cornerstone for every scholar interested in this particu- lar field of Jewish literature, the exact place of compilation of the work remains obscure.2 In recent years, however, more and more new textual witnesses have come to light, mainly fragments from the Tanhuma Buber recension that were persevered in book bindings of Christian books and manuscripts from Western and Southern Europe, that have later been opened. All these discoveries sup- port the suggestion that the manuscripts that were used by Buber represent a later Ashkenazic version of that commentary to the Torah and can no longer be treated as early witnesses of a Midrash Tanhuma-Yelamdenu.3 1 For an overview of recent research see, e. g., M. Bregman, “Tanhuma Yelamdenu,” in Encyclopaedia Judaica (2nd ed.: Detroit: Thomson Gale, 2007), vol.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TANHUMA-YELAMMEDENU LITERATURE Studies in The
    THE TANHUMA-YELAMMEDENU LITERATURE The Tanhuma-Yelammedenu literature includes the two versions of Midrash Tanhuma, Exodus Rabbah (II), Numbers Rabbah (II), the two versions of Deuteronomy Rabbah, large parts of Pesiqta Rabbati and additional fragmentary versions of this popular type of homiletic midrash. The studies in this volume include a survey of previous research, a catalogue of some 200 textual witnesses and a synoptic analysis of four versions of midrashic material to the triennial lection beginning with Exodus 7:8. The final chapter draws general conclusions about the date and provenance of the versions and presents a stratigraphic approach to the multifaceted evolution of this important genre of midrashic literature. "At last—an excellent exposition of the nature of the Tanhuma literature which takes into account all the textual and historical aspects of the problem" — Prof. Chaim Milikowsky. "Bregman's book is undoubtedly the best research ever done about the most complicated issue in the study of rabbinic literature: the Tanhuma-type Midrashim. Based on a vast knowledge of the history of rabbinic literature, an admirable power of innovation and impressive capability of synthesis, this book lays the foundations for all future scholarship of a very important stratum in the literature of ancient Judaism." — Prof. Avigdor Shinan. Marc Bregman received his PhD from The Hebrew University in Jerusalem in 1991. Since 1978, he has been teaching at the Jerusalem campus of the Hebrew Union College. Prof. Bregman has published academic research and belles lettres in Hebrew and English on a wide variety of topics in both scholarly and popular journals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right of Appeal in Talmudic Law Arthur Jay Silverstein
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 6 | Issue 1 1973 The Right of Appeal in Talmudic Law Arthur Jay Silverstein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Arthur Jay Silverstein, The Right of Appeal in Talmudic Law, 6 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 33 (1974) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol6/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 19731 The Right of Appeal in Talmudic Law Arthur Jay Silverstein The law is what it is today because of what the law was yesterday; it cannot escape its ancestry, Alison Reppy, Common Law Pleading, 2 N.Y. LAW FORUM 1, 5 (1956). ZHE SYSTEM of appellate review' in the United States has been ' criticized for its form and limited scope. 2 These concerns are reflected in the various appellate procedures developed by Talmudic law. Since jurisprudential systems typically establish methods of review, the Talmudic choices are important as they reveal THE AUTHOR: ARTHUR JAY SILVER- some basic precepts of that sys- STEIN (B.A., Rutgers University; J.D., Yale Law School) is currently pursuing tern and by comparison allow post-doctoral studies in Jewish law at insights into our own. A com- Mirrer Yeshivah in New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree of Souls: the Mythology of Judaism
    96 MYTHS OF CREATION 124. THE PILLARS OF THE WORLD The world stands upon pillars. Some say it stands on twelve pillars, according to the number of the tribes of Israel. Others say that it rests on seven pillars, which stand on the water. This water is on top of the mountains, which rest on wind and storm. Still others say that the world stands on three pillars. Once every three hundred years they move slightly, causing earthquakes. But Rabbi Eleazar ben Shammua says that it rests on one pillar, whose name is “Righteous.” One of the ancient creation myths found in many cultures describes the earth as standing on one or more pillars. In this Jewish version of the myth, several theories are found—that the earth stands on twelve, seven, or three pillars—or on one. Rabbi Eleazar ben Shammua gives that one pillar the name of Tzaddik, “Righteous,” under- scoring an allegorical reading of this myth, whereby God is the pillar that supports the world. This, of course, is the central premise of monotheism. Alternatively, his comment may be understood to refer to the Tzaddik, the righteous man whose exist- ence is required for the world to continue to exist. Or it might refer to the principle of righteousness, and how the world could not exist without it. Sources: B. Hagigah 12b; Me’am Lo’ez on Genesis 1:10. 125. THE FOUNDATION STONE The world has a foundation stone. This stone serves as the starting point for all that was created, and serves as a true foundation.
    [Show full text]