DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 NSDUH Field Interviewer Manual September 2013 I Table of Contents Table of Contents (Continued)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2014 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH Field Interviewer Manual Field Interviewer Computer Manual Contract No. HHSS283201300001C Project No. 0213757 Prepared for: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Rockville, Maryland 20857 Prepared by: Research Triangle Institute September 2013 Field Interviewer:__________________________________________ FI ID No:__________________ 2014 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH Field Interviewer Manual Contract No. HHSS283201300001C Project No. 0213757 Prepared for: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Rockville, Maryland 20857 Prepared by: Research Triangle Institute September 2013 2014 NATIONAL SURVEY ON DRUG USE AND HEALTH Field Interviewer Manual Contract No. HHSS283201300001C Project No. 0213757 Prepared for: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Rockville, Maryland 20857 Prepared by: Research Triangle Institute September 2013 Research Triangle Institute MISSION To improve the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. VISION To be the world’s leading independent research organization, recognized for solving critical social and scientific problems. VALUES Integrity - We perform with the highest ethical standards of individual and group honesty. We communicate openly and realistically with each other and with our clients. Excellence - We strive to deliver results with exceptional quality and value. Innovation - We encourage multidisciplinary collaboration, creativity and independent thinking in everything we do. Respect for the Individual - We treat one another fairly, with dignity and equity. We support each other to develop to our full potential. Respect for RTI - We recognize that the strength of RTI International lies in our commitment, collectively and individually, to RTI’s vision, mission, values, strategies and practices. Our commitment to the Institute is the foundation for all other organizational commitments. Fiscal Responsibility - We operate with financial integrity and transparency. We are accountable for cost competitiveness and continuing financial responsibility. Objectivity - Our work is independent of undue influences by political, economic, or other factors. We maintain the highest level of scientific objectivity in our work. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY ........................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Research Triangle Institute (RTI) ........................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Project Organization ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Study Background ................................................................................................ 1-3 1.3.1 Brief History of NSDUH ......................................................................... 1-3 1.3.2 Current Design for NSDUH..................................................................... 1-4 1.4 Data Collection Schedule ..................................................................................... 1-5 1.5 Project Abbreviations and Terminology .............................................................. 1-8 1.6 Use of Manual ...................................................................................................... 1-8 2. YOUR JOB AS A FIELD INTERVIEWER ............................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Screening and Interviewing Process .................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Field Interviewer Responsibilities ....................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Professional Ethics and Respondents' Rights ...................................................... 2-6 2.5 Importance of Confidentiality .............................................................................. 2-7 2.6 Adherence to Procedures ..................................................................................... 2-7 2.7 Performance Expectations ................................................................................... 2-9 2.8 Materials, Supplies, and Equipment .................................................................... 2-9 3. LOCATING SAMPLE DWELLING UNITS ............................................................. 3-1 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Definitions................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Overview of the Sampling Process .......................................................... 3-1 3.2 Inspecting the Segment Materials ........................................................................ 3-2 3.2.1 Locator Maps ......................................................................................... 3-20 3.2.2 Block Listing Map(s) ............................................................................. 3-20 3.2.3 Selected Dwelling Unit (DU) List ......................................................... 3-22 3.3 Locating the Segment and the Designated SDUs .............................................. 3-24 3.3.1 Housing Units ........................................................................................ 3-24 3.3.2 Group Quarters Units ............................................................................. 3-25 3.4 Determining the Status of Each SDU ................................................................ 3-25 3.4.1 Housing Units ........................................................................................ 3-25 2014 NSDUH Field Interviewer Manual September 2013 i Table of Contents Table of Contents (continued) 3.4.2 Group Quarters Units ............................................................................. 3-28 3.4.3 Units That Do Not Qualify as Dwelling Units ...................................... 3-30 3.5 Checking for Missed Dwelling Units ................................................................ 3-32 3.5.1 Missed DUs in Regular Housing Units (e.g., houses, townhouses, trailers) .............................................................................. 3-32 3.5.2 Missed DUs in Apartment and Condo Buildings .................................. 3-33 3.5.3 Missed DUs in Group Quarters Structures (e.g., dormitories, shelters) 3-33 3.5.4 Dealing with Listed DUs That Should Not Have Been Listed .............. 3-34 3.6 Adding Missed Dwelling Units ......................................................................... 3-34 3.6.1 Adding Missed Housing Units ............................................................... 3-34 3.6.2 Reconciling Missed DUs ....................................................................... 3-38 3.6.3 Adding Missed HUs on the Maps .......................................................... 3-40 3.6.4 Adding Missed Units within a Group Quarters Structure ...................... 3-42 3.6.5 Adding Missed Units within an Apartment or Condo Building ............ 3-42 3.7 When to Call ...................................................................................................... 3-45 3.8 Importance of Sampling Activities .................................................................... 3-45 4. CONTACTING DWELLING UNIT RESIDENTS .................................................... 4-1 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Scheduling Fieldwork .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Assignment Materials .......................................................................................... 4-2 4.3.1 Case Identification Information ............................................................... 4-2 4.4 Record of Calls .................................................................................................... 4-3 4.4.1 Screening Result Codes ........................................................................... 4-3 4.4.2 Recording Comments ............................................................................. 4-10 4.5 Lead Letters ....................................................................................................... 4-12 4.6 Organizing Your Materials ................................................................................ 4-12 4.7 Initial Approach ................................................................................................. 4-14 4.8 Your Introduction............................................................................................... 4-14 4.9 Eligible Screening Respondent and Address Verification ................................. 4-15 4.10 Informed Consent............................................................................................... 4-16 4.11 Handling Language Barriers .............................................................................. 4-19 4.12 Handling Controlled Access Situations ............................................................. 4-25 2014 NSDUH Field Interviewer Manual September 2013 ii Table of Contents Table of Contents (continued) 5. OBTAINING PARTICIPATION ................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Introduction .........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Participant Handbook

    Participant Handbook

    LOWNDES COUNTY DUI COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK STATE COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY 327 NORTH ASHLEY STREET VALDOSTA, GA 31601 PHONE: 229-671-2895 FAX: 229-671-3441 Lowndes County DUI Court Team: Ellen S. Golden Judge, State Court Cynthia Welch Assistant Solicitor-General Gee Edwards Defense Attorney Stacey Bass Court Coordinator Kayla Porter Probation Officer Laci Rankhorn Treatment Provider Jason Reeves Surveillance Officer Revised 3/1/19 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................2 INTRODUCTION TO THE LOWNDES COUNTY STATE COURT DUI COURT.......................... 4 TREATMENT OVERVIEW.................................................................................................................... 6 I. PHASES OF THE DUI COURT PROGRAM........................................................................................7 Phase 1 – (approximately 17 weeks)....................................................................................................7 Phase 2 – (approximately 17 weeks)................................................................................................... 8 Phase 3 – (approximately 17 weeks)................................................................................................... 9 Phase 4 Aftercare- (approximately 3 months)....................................................................................9 Phase Progression.........................................................................................................................
  • NTP-CERHR Expert Panel Report on the Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine

    NTP-CERHR Expert Panel Report on the Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine

    Published 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.w Birth Defects Research (Part B) 74:471–584 (2005) NTP-CERHR Expert Panel Report on the Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Of Amphetamine and Methamphetamine Mari Golub,1 Lucio Costa,2 Kevin Crofton,3 Deborah Frank,4 Peter Fried,5 Beth Gladen6 Rogene Henderson,7 Erica Liebelt,8 Shari Lusskin,9 Sue Marty,10 Andrew Rowland11 John Scialli12 and Mary Vore13 1California Environment Protection Agency, Sacramento, California 2University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 3U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 4Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 5Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario 6National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 7Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico 8University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama 9New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan 11University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 12Phoenix, Arizona 13University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky PREFACE studies indexed before December 31, 2004. References were also identified from databases such as REPRO- The National Toxicology Program (NTP) and the TOXs, HSDB, IRIS, and DART and from report National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences bibliographies. (NIEHS) established the NTP Center for the Evaluation This evaluation resulted from the efforts of a 13- of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR) in June 1998. member panel of government and non-government The purpose of the Center is to provide timely, unbiased, scientists that culminated in a public expert panel scientifically sound evaluations of human and experi- meeting held January 10–12, 2005. This report is a mental evidence for adverse effects on reproduction and product of the Expert Panel and is intended to (1) development caused by agents to which humans may be interpret the strength of scientific evidence that exposed.
  • San Juan County Adult Drug Court Participant Handbook

    San Juan County Adult Drug Court Participant Handbook

    Participant Manual SEVENTH DISTRICT ADULT DRUG COURT MONTICELLO, UTAH Updated January 2018 Subject to Change 1 2 Welcome to the San Juan County Adult Drug Court This Handbook is designed to introduce you to the San Juan County Drug Court program, answer your questions and provide overall information about the Drug Court Program. As a participant, you will be expected to follow the instructions given in Drug Court by the Judge and comply with the treatment plan developed for you by the treatment team. If you are reading this Handbook it means that we are confident that Drug Court will help you to learn how to make successful choices free of the influence of drugs or alcohol. 3 Table of Contents Welcome to the San Juan County Adult Drug Court ...................................................................... 3 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Drug Court Team ........................................................................................................................... 7 Judge’s Role ........................................................................................................................... 7 San Juan County Attorney’s Role (Prosecutor) ....................................................................... 8 Defense Attorney Role (Your Attorney) ................................................................................... 8 Probation Officer’s Role .........................................................................................................
  • The Impact of NMR and MRI

    The Impact of NMR and MRI

    WELLCOME WITNESSES TO TWENTIETH CENTURY MEDICINE _____________________________________________________________________________ MAKING THE HUMAN BODY TRANSPARENT: THE IMPACT OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING _________________________________________________ RESEARCH IN GENERAL PRACTICE __________________________________ DRUGS IN PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE ______________________ THE MRC COMMON COLD UNIT ____________________________________ WITNESS SEMINAR TRANSCRIPTS EDITED BY: E M TANSEY D A CHRISTIE L A REYNOLDS Volume Two – September 1998 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 1998 First published by the Wellcome Trust, 1998 Occasional Publication no. 6, 1998 The Wellcome Trust is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 186983 539 1 All volumes are freely available online at www.history.qmul.ac.uk/research/modbiomed/wellcome_witnesses/ Please cite as : Tansey E M, Christie D A, Reynolds L A. (eds) (1998) Wellcome Witnesses to Twentieth Century Medicine, vol. 2. London: Wellcome Trust. Key Front cover photographs, L to R from the top: Professor Sir Godfrey Hounsfield, speaking (NMR) Professor Robert Steiner, Professor Sir Martin Wood, Professor Sir Rex Richards (NMR) Dr Alan Broadhurst, Dr David Healy (Psy) Dr James Lovelock, Mrs Betty Porterfield (CCU) Professor Alec Jenner (Psy) Professor David Hannay (GPs) Dr Donna Chaproniere (CCU) Professor Merton Sandler (Psy) Professor George Radda (NMR) Mr Keith (Tom) Thompson (CCU) Back cover photographs, L to R, from the top: Professor Hannah Steinberg, Professor
  • Cigars Were Consumed Last Year (1997) in the United States

    Cigars Were Consumed Last Year (1997) in the United States

    Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 9 Preface The recent increase in cigar consumption began in 1993 and was dismissed by many in public health as a passing fad that would quickly dissipate. Recently released data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) suggests that the upward trend in cigar use might not be as temporary as some had predicted. The USDA now projects a total of slightly more than 5 billion cigars were consumed last year (1997) in the United States. Sales of large cigars, which comprise about two-thirds of the total U.S. cigar market, increased 18 percent between 1996 and 1997. Consumption of premium cigars (mostly imported and hand-made) increased even more, an astounding 90 percent last year and an estimated 250 percent since 1993. In contrast, during this same time period, cigarette consumption declined 2 percent. This dramatic change in tobacco use raises a number of public health questions: Who is using cigars? What are the health risks? Are premium cigars less hazardous than regular cigars? What are the risks if you don't inhale the smoke? What are the health implications of being around a cigar smoker? In order to address these questions, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) undertook a complete review of what is known about cigar smoking and is making this information available to the American public. This monograph, number 9 in a series initiated by NCI in 1991, is the work of over 50 scientists both within and outside the Federal Government. Thirty experts participated in the multi-stage peer review process (see acknowledgments).
  • NSDUH MRB Instrumentation Protocol Changes

    NSDUH MRB Instrumentation Protocol Changes

    Instrumentation Protocol Changes The 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) instrumentation protocols underwent several modifications from the protocols employed for the 2014 NSDUH. A summary of the changes for the 2015 NSDUH can be divided into three topics: (1) the computer-assisted interviewing (CAI) tablet screening instrument, (2) the CAI questionnaire, and (3) the interviewer materials. 1. Screening Instrument Using the 2014 Screening Application as a base, questions, response options, and informed consent wording were modified for the 2015 Screening Application. Listed below are the Screening Application changes for 2015: • As necessary, dates were updated in the screening program. • As necessary, specification updates were made to reflect current tablet screening programming and format. • Response options in the Spanish-language screener have been translated into Spanish. • In the Study Introduction, "Research Triangle Institute" has been replaced with "RTI International," and "U.S. Public Health Service" has been replaced with "U.S. Department of Health and Human Services." • All ePTE data screens were removed. • Field Interviewer (FI) Debriefing Questions were moved from the CAI Questionnaire to the screening tablet, to be administered after leaving the household. They are now documented as "Section 9, FI Debriefing Questions," within the NSDUH Screening Specifications document. 2. CAI Questionnaire Using the 2014 CAI Questionnaire as a base, questions and routing were modified for the 2015 CAI Questionnaire. Listed below are the CAI Questionnaire changes for 2015: Introduction • The CAI instrument version, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number, and OMB expiration date were updated in the Introduction section. • The OMB control number was also updated in the Public Reporting Burden statement.
  • 1. What Is a Trade Mark?

    1. What Is a Trade Mark?

    To mark it, to mark it A guide to trade marks and their use DYSON and the Dyson logo are registered trade marks of Dyson Research Ltd. Parody of Dyson logo used with the gracious permission of Dyson Research Ltd. 23.Apr.2021 © Tony McStea 1996-2021 About the Author… (with apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan) When I was a lad, I served a term As patent tech. assistant in a big paint firm I wrote applications and I argued and tried Patent offices to show that grant was justified And this sort of thing so suited me That now I’m patent attorney in industry. Acknowledgement My grateful thanks to all of you out there who helped me with this revised version by offering comments, corrections, criticisms, suggestions and advice, some of which I ignored, which is why the booklet still exists. The responsibility for any errors (not to mention the mediocre drawings and terrible jokes (or is it mediocre jokes and terrible drawings?)) is entirely mine. The responsibility for any views or opinions expressed herein is also entirely mine. N.B. All costs mentioned herein were correct (more or less) at June, 2013, but, because of the tendency of official fees to fluctuation (and exchange rates to go up and down like yo-yos), they should be taken as general guides only. 23.Apr.2021 © Tony McStea 1996-2021 Contents p. Trade Marks – a quick guide i-xii Introduction 1 basic concepts 2 What is a trade mark? What is a registered trade mark? Why bother with registration? history 3 trade mark law for beginners 4 distinctiveness “goods/services of the same description”
  • Learning Factors in Substance Abuse

    Learning Factors in Substance Abuse

    Learning Factors in Substance Abuse U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • PublIc Health Service • Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Admimistration Learning Factors in Substance Abuse Editor: Barbara A. Ray, Ph.D. Office of Financing and Coverage Policy National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 84 1988 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 NIDA Research Monographs are prepared by the research divisions of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and published by its Office of Science. The primary objective of the series is to provide critical reviews of research problem areas and techniques, the content of state-of-the-art conferences, and integrative research reviews. Its dual publication emphasis is rapid and targeted dissemination to the scientific and professional community. Editorial Advisors MARTIN W. ADLER, Ph.D. MARY L. JACOBSON Temple University School of Medicine National Federation of Parents for Philadelphla, Pennsylvania Drug-Free Youth Omaha, Nebraska SYDNEY ARCHER, Ph. D Rensselaer Polytechnic lnstitute Troy, New York REESE T. JONES, M.D. Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric lnstitute RICHARD E. BELLEVILLE, Ph.D. San Francisco, California NB Associates. Health Sciences RockviIle, Maryland DENISE KANDEL, Ph.D. KARST J. BESTEMAN College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alcohol and Drug Problems Associatlon Columbia University of North America New York, New York Washington, DC GILBERT J. BOTVIN, Ph. D Cornell University Medical College HERBERT KLEBER, M.D.
  • USA Brief in Red Earth

    USA Brief in Red Earth

    Case: 10-3165 Document: 227 Page: 1 09/28/2010 114238 74 10-3165-cv 10-3191-cv 10-3213-cv IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT RED EARTH LLC, d/b/a SENECA SMOKESHOP, AARON J. PIERCE, SENECA FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JOHN E. POTTER, in his official capacity as Postmaster General and Chief Executive Officer of the United States Postal Service, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OPENING BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES [Counsel Listed On Following Page] Case: 10-3165 Document: 227 Page: 2 09/28/2010 114238 74 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES TONY WEST Assistant Attorney General WILLIAM J. HOCHUL, Jr. United States Attorney MARK B. STERN ALISA B. KLEIN MICHAEL P. ABATE (202) 616-8209 Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Room 7318 Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Case: 10-3165 Document: 227 Page: 3 09/28/2010 114238 74 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION. ....................................................................... 1 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES. ............................................................................ 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE................................................................................. 2 STATEMENT OF FACTS. ...................................................................................... 5 I. Statutory Background........................................................................... 5 A. State and local excise taxes curb tobacco use, particularly underage use.. ......................................................... 5 B. The PACT Act addresses the problems presented by remote sales of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco................. 7 II.
  • Macdonald V Mcginniss

    Macdonald V Mcginniss

    MacDonald vs. McGinniss Trial Transcript i. UNITED STATES DIRSTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 HONORABLE WILLIAM J. REA, JUDGE PRESIDINC 5 G 7 8 DR. JEFFREY R- MAC DONALD, 9 Plaintiff 10 vs. No. CV 84-6170-WJR 11 JOE-MC GINNISS, 12 Defendant. 13 v\ 14 m .\ ^ REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 16-. Los Angeles, California 17 Thursday, July 30, 1987 18 19 20 21 Sherrill Boutte, CSR Official Court Reporter 22 402 United States Courthouse v.. 312 North Spring Street 23 Los Angeles, California 90012 (213) 613-1381 24 25 INDEX I 2 3 4 WITNESSES 5 6 PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS: , DIRECT' CROSS REDIRECT RE-CROSS : 7 MAC DONALD, JEFFREY' R.' "•> 4 8 I 9 10 ... >*-• 11 12 13 EXHIBITS. >; 14 B* (FOR*-- 15 EXHIBIT '' ID ENTIFI CAT I ON >\r"TEV/I~DENCE 16 159 5 17 474 58 5 8 .-M; IS 475 58 59 19 476 59 59 20 21 22 REPORTED BY: 23 Sherrill Boutte Pages 3 56 3*., Sft' 24 Kathleen Haaland 57 87 25 -••V "-^ A .• v*e_ \v , 1 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA; THURSDAY, JULY 30, 1987; 10:00 AM to 2 r THE CLERK: Civil 84-6170-WJR, a f i 4 Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald vs. Joe McGinniss. Counsel, please state your appearances. 5 6 MR. BOSTWICK: Good morning, your Honor. 7 Gary Bostwick and Jo-Ann Horn on behalf of the plaintiff. i Dr. Jeffrey R. MacDonald. 8 9 MR. KORNSTEIN: Good morning, your Honor. Daniel Kornstein and Mark Piatt on behalf of the defendant, 10 Joe McGinniss. 11 THE COURT: All right.
  • 145677NCJRS.Pdf

    145677NCJRS.Pdf

    ,. "I ~- 1 _ .. If you have issues viewing or accessing this file• contact• us at NCJRS.gov.• a .~ .. A ~-.- .. , , , ... ,T:,: , I " 145677 • • U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating It. Points of vieW or opinions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been gra~~~ti tute for Substance Abuse Research to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner. • " , '41!'~- • \..s " t CONTENTS Preface Quiz Parents Schools Marijuana Hashish Hashish Oil Opium Heroin Dilaudid ~2'1:>':'S-t'Jhm~·';"la"·~¥s'"r.':Jt,r;\;~)'!(,"iii,,';~,:j~'i:l;:i~;i~iJ\t:~.. ~~ ,,'~ - H :'" • i' b ":l,' ~~,,] .• :;<",,\/,,::'y,'.P\ '-1';;. ;;~'''1.W'··· .:'t''''';~'l;>;-·:t.lW;i~:\·~/~;~~;;;:~i·' ~ Cocaine Smoking Cocaine Amphetamines/Methamphetamines Clandestine LSD·25 PCP Mescaline Psilocybin· Psilocyn Mushrooms [4zTnhalants~'-',,-'~~--- ~~ Steroids Prescription Drugs Most Abused Designer Drugs The Look-alikes Alcohol Plus Other Drugs Warning Signs of Alcoholism Tobacco Smokeless Tobacco 65 Glossary of Slang Terms 67 References ~~~~~~~----------,.----- The following true story was related by Mrs. Chantal Devine, wife ofthe Honorable Grant Devine, Premier of Saskatchewan, at the PRIDE Canada National Conference on Youth and Drugs in May, 1988 in Ottawa. The story was told to Mrs. Devine by Father Lucien Larre, a priest in Saskatchewan and a founder of Bosco Homes, a home for delinquent boys.
  • 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables

    2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables

    Key Definitions for the 2010 Detailed Tables and National Findings Report This glossary provides definitions for many of the measures and terms used in these tables and in the national findings report1 from the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Where relevant, cross-references also are provided. For some key terms, specific question wording, including "feeder questions" that precede the question(s), is provided for clarity. Abuse Abuse of illicit drugs or alcohol was defined as meeting one or more of the four criteria for abuse included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)2 and if the definition for dependence was not met for that substance. Additional criteria for alcohol and marijuana abuse include the use of these substances on 6 or more days in the past 12 months. These questions have been included in the survey since 2000. Responses to the dependence or abuse questions based only on the past year use of methamphetamine, Ambien®, Adderall®, or specific hallucinogens from the routing patterns added between 2005 and 2008 were not included in these measures. See Section B.4.2 of Appendix B in the 2010 national findings report for additional details. SEE: "Dependence," "Need for Illicit Drug or Alcohol Use Treatment," and "Prevalence." Adderall® Use Measures of use of the prescription stimulant Adderall® in the respondent's lifetime, the past year, and the past month were developed from responses to the noncore question about recency of use: "Earlier, the computer recorded that you have used Adderall that was not prescribed for you or that you took only for the experience or feeling it caused.