DOCSLIB.ORG

MDOT Maryland Transit Administration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MDOT Maryland Transit Administration MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL PROGRAM SUMMARY ($ MILLIONS) SIX - YEAR FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 TOTAL Construction Program Major Projects 1,149.8 571.6 481.5 343.0 268.5 268.2 3,082.6 System Preservation Minor Projects 106.4 114.2 114.6 113.0 116.1 107.9 672.2 Development & Evaluation Program 7.7 14.0 22.0 30.0 147.1 30.9 251.8 SUBTOTAL 1,264.0 699.9 618.1 485.9 531.7 407.1 4,006.6 Capital Salaries, Wages & Other Costs 12.5 13.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 15.5 84.0 TOTAL 1,276.5 712.9 632.1 499.9 546.7 422.6 4,090.6 Special Funds 702.6 113.1 421.0 343.0 308.3 172.2 2,060.2 Federal Funds 453.3 554.3 160.8 156.9 238.3 250.4 1,814.0 Other Funds 120.6 45.5 50.3 - - - 216.4 * For Minors breakdown, please refer to the System Preservation Minor Projects Program report. MARC Freight Light Rail Baltimore Metro Bus Multi-Modal Locally Operated Transit Systems MDOT MTA CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION -- Line 1 Primary Construction Program PROJECT: MARC Maintenance, Layover, & Storage Facilities DESCRIPTION: Planning, environmental documentation, design, and construction of maintenance, layover, and storage facilities. Includes design and construction of storage tracks and replacement of track switches at MARC Martin State Airport facility and the construction of a heavy maintenance building at the MARC Riverside facility. PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT: Projects will provide a critically needed maintenance facility for the MARC fleet. Upgrades to the storage facility will reduce interference with Amtrak operations at Washington Union Station and Penn Station and provide urgently needed fleet storage away from the passenger platforms at the station. SMART GROWTH STATUS: Project Not Location Specific Not Subject to PFA Law X Project Inside PFA Grandfathered Project Outside PFA Exception Will Be Required STATE GOALS : Maryland Transportation Plan (MTP) Goals/Selection Criteria: PFA Status Yet to Be Determined Exception Granted X Safe, Secure, and Resilient X Quality & Efficiency X Maintain & Modernize Environmental Protection ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS: None. Economic Opportunity & Reduce Congestion Fiscal Responsibility Better Transportation Choices & Connections EXPLANATION: Additional storage capacity enables MARC trains to be stored away from passenger platforms, STATUS: Design of Martin State Airport storage tracks minimizing disruptions and delays caused by congestion around the platforms and will help with maintenance complete. Construction is underway for the heavy inspections. The new maintenance facility will house specialized equipment to support maintenance of MARC's diesel maintenance building at the Riverside location. locomotives. SIGNIFICANT CHANGE FROM FY 2021 - 26 CTP: Project cost X SPECIAL X FEDERAL GENERAL OTHER POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE: decreased by $13.7M due to the completion of real estate TOTAL acquisition of the MARC Riverside facility ($19.9M), and the addition of the MARC Martin's Yard Power Switch project, an PHASE ESTIMATED EXPENDED PREVIOUS CURRENT BUDGET PLANNING SIX BALANCE FRA competitive grant award ($6.2M). COST THRU YEAR YEAR YEAR FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY YEAR TO ($000) CLOSE YEAR 2021 2022 2023 ...2024... ...2025... ...2026... ...2027... TOTAL COMPLETE Planning 147 147 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Engineering 7,913 6,949 3,138 809 155 0 0 0 0 964 0 Right-of-way 2,033 2,033 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Utility 787 241 241 290 257 0 0 0 0 547 0 USAGE: MARC annual ridership in FY 21 exceeded 900,000. Construction 77,349 13,355 12,713 40,820 19,277 3,897 0 0 0 63,994 0 Total 88,229 22,725 16,179 41,918 19,689 3,897 0 0 0 65,504 0 Federal-Aid 67,442 18,282 13,761 33,098 13,919 2,143 0 0 0 49,160 0 Special 19,287 4,399 2,374 8,409 5,036 1,442 0 0 0 14,888 0 Other 1,500 44 44 411 733 311 0 0 0 1,456 0 1217, 1545, 1738 PAGE MTA--1 MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION -- Line 2 Primary Construction Program PROJECT: MARC Improvements on Camden, Brunswick, and Penn Lines DESCRIPTION: Ongoing improvement program of the MARC Camden, Brunswick, and Penn lines to ensure safety and quality of service. Program is implemented through CSX and Amtrak construction agreements. CSX efforts include projects such as interlocking replacements and other track improvements. Amtrak efforts include projects such as passenger upgrades at Baltimore Penn Station and Washington Union Station, interlocking work, and other track improvements along the Northeast Corridor. PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT: Investments in passenger rail corridor infrastructure improvements are necessary to continue quality MARC service. SMART GROWTH STATUS: X Project Not Location Specific Not Subject to PFA Law Project Inside PFA Grandfathered Project Outside PFA Exception Will Be Required STATE GOALS : Maryland Transportation Plan (MTP) Goals/Selection Criteria: PFA Status Yet to Be Determined Exception Granted X Safe, Secure, and Resilient X Quality & Efficiency X Maintain & Modernize Environmental Protection ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS: None. Economic Opportunity & Reduce Congestion Fiscal Responsibility Better Transportation Choices & Connections EXPLANATION: Projects such as interlocking replacements and platform improvements are needed to keep the system STATUS: Replacement of Carroll and W. Baltimore/Lansdowne in a state of good repair. interlockings was completed in FY 21. Upgrades to the signals at Greenbelt was completed in FY 21. Improvements to the Jessup yard will be completed in FY 22. Ongoing projects on the Penn Line are determined by the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008. SIGNIFICANT CHANGE FROM FY 2021 - 26 CTP: Project X SPECIAL X FEDERAL GENERAL OTHER POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE: funding allocation increased by $40.0M due to the addition of TOTAL FY 27, completion of the real estate acquisition at MARC Odenton Station, and miscellaneous preservation program PHASE ESTIMATED EXPENDED PREVIOUS CURRENT BUDGET PLANNING SIX BALANCE adjustments. COST THRU YEAR YEAR YEAR FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY YEAR TO ($000) CLOSE YEAR 2021 2022 2023 ...2024... ...2025... ...2026... ...2027... TOTAL COMPLETE Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Engineering 6,083 6,083 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right-of-way 19 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 USAGE: MARC annual ridership in FY 21 exceeded 900,000. Construction 497,412 290,030 27,632 18,006 32,156 34,746 37,592 40,721 44,161 207,382 0 Total 503,514 296,132 27,952 18,006 32,156 34,746 37,592 40,721 44,161 207,382 0 Federal-Aid 392,606 227,390 20,681 13,715 25,725 27,797 30,074 32,577 35,329 165,216 0 Special 110,908 68,742 7,270 4,291 6,431 6,949 7,518 8,144 8,832 42,166 0 Other 0 0183, 0687, 1460, 1937 PAGE MTA--2 MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION -- Line 3 Primary Construction Program PROJECT: MARC Coaches - Overhauls and Replacement DESCRIPTION: Minor overhaul of 63 MARC III coaches, the overhaul of MARC IV railcars and truck components, and the overhaul or replacement of 60 MARC multi-level railcars. PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT: Overhauls will extend the life cycle of mechanical systems and car bodies, providing safe and reliable vehicles for MARC service. SMART GROWTH STATUS: X Project Not Location Specific Not Subject to PFA Law Project Inside PFA Grandfathered Project Outside PFA Exception Will Be Required STATE GOALS : Maryland Transportation Plan (MTP) Goals/Selection Criteria: PFA Status Yet to Be Determined Exception Granted Safe, Secure, and Resilient X Quality & Efficiency X Maintain & Modernize Environmental Protection ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS: None. Economic Opportunity & Reduce Congestion Fiscal Responsibility Better Transportation Choices & Connections EXPLANATION: This project includes railcar purchases and overhauls of MARC coaches to refurbish and update STATUS: Overhaul of 63 MARC III coaches is underway. Nine mechanical systems, car bodies, and truck components. overhauled coaches are operating in revenue service with all coaches anticipated to be overhauled by FY 23. SIGNIFICANT CHANGE FROM FY 2021 - 26 CTP: Project X SPECIAL X FEDERAL GENERAL OTHER POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCE: funding allocation increased by $23.2M due to the addition of TOTAL FY 27 and miscellaneous preservation program adjustments. PHASE ESTIMATED EXPENDED PREVIOUS CURRENT BUDGET PLANNING SIX BALANCE COST THRU YEAR YEAR YEAR FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY YEAR TO ($000) CLOSE YEAR 2021 2022 2023 ...2024... ...2025... ...2026... ...2027... TOTAL COMPLETE Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Engineering 2,104 604 0 0 0 0 250 1,250 0 1,500 0 Right-of-way 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Utility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 USAGE: MARC annual ridership in FY 21 exceeded 900,000. Construction 91,536 28,140 3,435 23,667 4,829 12,300 0 0 22,600 63,396 0 Total 93,639 28,743 3,435 23,667 4,829 12,300 250 1,250 22,600 64,896 0 Federal-Aid 74,005 22,523 2,748 18,934 3,428 9,840 200 1,000 18,080 51,481 0 Special 19,635 6,220 687 4,733 1,401 2,460 50 250 4,520 13,415 0 Other 0 1304, 1502, 1567, 1569 PAGE MTA--3 MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION -- Line 4 Primary Construction Program PROJECT: MARC Locomotives - Overhauls and Replacements DESCRIPTION: Overhaul eight diesel SC-44 locomotives, overhaul six GP39H-2 diesel locomotives, complete mid-life overhaul for 26 MP36PH-3C diesel locomotives, develop specifications for new locomotive procurements, and replace six electric locomotives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Construction Program
    2019 Construction Program PennDOT Engineering District 1 SERVING CRAWFORD, ERIE, FOREST, MERCER, VENANGO, AND WARREN COUNTIES Tom Wolf, Governor Leslie S. Richards, Secretary of Transportation James A. Foringer, P.E., District Executive Contact Information PennDOT Engineering District 1 255 Elm Street PO Box 398 Oil City, PA 16301 (814) 678-7085 Business Hours: 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Monday — Friday PennDOT’s Engineering District 1 is responsible for the state-maintained transportation network in this region. This includes 3,689 miles of roadway and 2,064 bridges in the six-county area. 2 Overall 2019 Construction Program • Projected 2019 Program: $125.44M • 2018 Program: $92.84M 3 District 1 2019 Construction Program Thank you for your interest in the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation District 1 Construction Program for 2019. This publication is intended to provide a general overview of projects that currently are under construction, and those scheduled to be awarded or begin construction in 2019. The 2019 Construction Book is divided into seven sections: one representing projects spanning the entire district or multiple counties and one representing each of the six counties in the district. Award dates, expected completion dates, project descriptions, project locations, costs, and maintenance of traffic are listed. The listed estimated cost for a project is for the construction phase only. County maps have also been included for reference. Please keep this book on hand throughout the upcoming construction season. Note: All information is correct as of the distribution date of this booklet. However, all dates and costs are estimated and, therefore, are subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful
    Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq..
    [Show full text]
  • History of MDOT MTA and the Lots System
    History of Transit Organization in the Baltimore Region Transit Agencies and Service Development in the Baltimore Region OVERVIEW The Baltimore Regional Transit Governance and Funding Study will develop alternatives for how the region could structure, organize, and fund regional transit services. The approach to developing these alternatives includes working with the Baltimore Regional Transit Board (BRTB) through an iterative process of research, analysis, and stakeholder input to ensure that the alternatives are grounded in experience, respectful of history and constraints, but creative enough to recognize opportunities. This technical memo, the first in the series, focuses on the history and development of transit services in the Baltimore Region. The first step involves focusing on the history and development of transit Image from Creative Commons: ETLamborghini services in the Baltimore region to understand how the existing service network came to be and provides the context for why some regional services are operated by the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) and others by Locally Operated Transit Systems (LOTS). Our goal is that by understanding the historical perspective, we will understand the transit network, its origins and evolution and its current form. The overview and historical perspective include the development and evolution of: • State leadership for local transit services in the City of Baltimore. • State leadership for regional transit services, including the MARC commuter rail system and the Commuter Bus program. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | KFH Group | KPMG | Tamar Henkin 1 History of Transit Organization in the Baltimore Region • County leadership for local services in the counties surrounding Baltimore through the Locally Operated Transit System (LOTS) program.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Construction Program
    2020 Construction Program PennDOT Engineering District 1 SERVING CRAWFORD, ERIE, FOREST, MERCER, VENANGO, AND WARREN COUNTIES Tom Wolf, Governor Yassmin Gramian, P.E., Secretary of Transportation James A. Foringer, P.E., District Executive 1 2020 Construction Book Contents Section Page(s) COVID-19 Response 3 District and County contact information 4 Construction Book Overview 5 2020 comparison to 2019 6 Crawford County Projects 7 - 15 Erie County Projects 16 - 25 Forest County Projects 26 - 29 Mercer County Projects 30 - 38 Venango County Projects 39 - 43 Warren County Projects 44 - 49 Districtwide and Multi County Projects 50 - 53 District Press Office Contacts 53 2 COVID-19 Response Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented times for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) statewide as well as in the District 1 Northwest Region, which includes Crawford, Erie, Forest, Mercer, Venango, and Warren counties. PennDOT now faces a unique situation as we review our construction, design and maintenance contract plans, determine the new project timelines, and revise the scope of work, all while upholding our responsibility to provide a safe and efficient transportation system. Because travel overall is down, less fuel is being purchased. We are seeing significant decreases in revenues. This is forcing us to adjust the county maintenance operations we can perform and limiting expenditures by significantly reducing resurfacing efforts. We are focusing on lower cost preservation activities such as patching, crack sealing, skin patching, and seal coats needed to preserve the system. These core activities will remain our focus throughout 2020 and into 2021 as revenue is expected to be down by at least 30 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Scores - Updated February 18, 2021
    FY 2022 (Round 4) Project Scores - Updated February 18, 2021 Crash Disadvantaged Enviro Econ Dev Intermodal Travel Time Land Use Land Use Inc Project Throughput Delay Crash Rate Acces to Multimodal Air Quality Score Divided by SMART SCALE $ SMART SCALE SMART SMART SCALE App Id Area Type District Submitted By Title DGP HPP Frequency Access to Jobs Impact Support Access Reliability Efficiency Efficiency Benefit Project Total Cost Score Score Score Jobs Score Access Score Score Total Cost Request Score SCALE Rank District Rank Score Score Score Score Score Score Score Score Score 4th Street at Holston Road Turn Lane 6886 D Bristol Wytheville Town x x 0.00 0.00 2.03 28.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.34 0.00 0.00 3.02 $ 2,531,180 11.93 $ 2,531,180 11.93 39 1 Improvements 6966 D Bristol Richlands Town Realignment of 2nd Street Approach x x 0.00 0.04 1.86 11.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 $ 1,533,931 8.57 $ 1,533,931 8.57 74 2 6996 D Bristol Wise County US58 East of Tacoma Mtn Median Barrier x x 0.00 0.00 3.53 10.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.72 $ 2,541,035 6.78 $ 2,541,035 6.78 94 3 Mount Rogers Planning 6848 D Bristol I-77 Northbound Truck Climbing Lane x 27.80 6.57 1.01 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 45.58 0.09 0.00 18.41 0.02 7.79 $ 16,816,599 4.64 $ 16,816,599 4.64 130 4 District Commission 6997 D Bristol Wise County US23 Safety Improvements x 0.00 0.00 6.11 9.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 2.10 $ 5,083,482 4.13 $ 5,083,482 4.13 143 5 Hawthorne Drive to 11th Street 6679 D Bristol Norton City x x 0.00 0.00
    [Show full text]
  • INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT of 1991 [Public Law 102–240; December 18, 1991] [As Amended Through P.L
    G:\COMP\INFRA\INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ....XML INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 [Public Law 102–240; December 18, 1991] [As Amended Through P.L. 116–94, Enacted December 20, 2019] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of Public Law 102–240. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https:// www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To develop a national intermodal surface transportation system, to author- ize funds for construction of highways, for highway safety programs, and for mass transit programs, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Sec. 1. Short title. Sec. 2. øRepealed.¿ Sec. 3. Secretary defined. TITLE I—SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PART A—TITLE 23 PROGRAMS Sec. 1001. Completion of interstate system. Sec. 1002. Obligation ceiling. Sec. 1003. Authorization of appropriations. Sec. 1004. Budget compliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Design-Build (PDB) IS 270 – Innovative Congestion Management Contract Submitted To: Montgomery and Frederick Counties
    Statement of Qualifications Progressive Design-Build (PDB) IS 270 – Innovative Congestion Management Contract Submitted to: Montgomery and Frederick Counties Contract No. MO0695172 Maryland Department of Transportation FAP No. N/A July 25, 2016 Submitted by: C ONCRETE C M G ENERAL, INC. in association with & Merrilees World Class Solutions with Local Leadership Table of Contents Section 1 Cover Letter Section 2 Key Staff Experience and Qualifications 1 – 18 Design Key Staff 1 – 6 Design Value-Added Staff 7 – 10 Construction Key Staff 11 – 15 Construction Value-Added Staff 16 – 17 Executive Committee 18 Section 3 Project Understanding and Progressive Design-Build Approach 19 – 26 Design-Builder’s Understanding of Projects Goals 19 – 22 Design-Builder’s Approach to Progressive Design-Build 23 – 24 Composition of the Design-Builder 25 – 26 Section 4 Design-Build Team Ability and/or Experience 27 – 42 The CGI Team 27 Mobility and Safety 27 – 29 Operability, Maintainability, and Adaptability 29 – 30 Implementing a Well-Managed Project 30 – 34 Familiarity with IS 270 Corridor 34 Ability on Similar Projects 35 Planning Related Experience 36 – 38 Design Related Experience 38 – 41 Construction Related Experience 41 – 42 IS 270 INNOVATIVE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT Page i MONTGOMERY AND FREDERICK COUNTIES Submitted to: Maryland Department of Transportation e f Experienc af t y S e and Qualifications K 2 Section 2 Key Staff Experience and Qualifications Submitted by: C ONCRETE C M G ENERAL, INC. in association with & Merrilees World Class Solutions with Local Leadership 2 | Key Staff Experience and Qualifications Design Key Staff The CGI Team has the regional, national, and international experience to identify the best solution for this project and the local experience to deliver it.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 (Route Log) Aadts State Highways
    2015 (Route Log) AADTs State Highways Vermont Agency of Transportation Highway Division Traffic Research Unit June 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page METHODOLOGY ………………………… 3 HEADING DEFINITIONS ……………….… 4 INTERSTATE ROUTES …………………… 5 - 8 US ROUTES …………………………….. 9 - 26 VERMONT ROUTES ……………………… 27 - 66 NAMED STATE HIGHWAYs ……………… 67 - 70 METHODOLOGY The following hierarchy of analysis was used to develop Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes for each of the road segments as depicted on the Vermont Agency of Transportation's "Route Logs": 1. An actual count, if one was available for the particular road segment. 2. An estimated volume based on an actual count taken in a neighboring section used in conjunction with the appropriate turning movement traffic volumes. 3. An estimated volume based on applying the growth rate from a nearby count station to the 2012 AADT. 4. If no counts were taken in the vicinity, the statewide average growth rate for the appropriate class of road was applied to the 2012 AADT. NOTES In compliance with the Traffic Monitoring Guide, the following rounding procedures are used in this report for actual and estimated 2015 AADTs: If <1000 then round to the nearest 10. If >1000 then round to the nearest 100. The AADT volumes listed in this report are calculated to represent a section of a particular roadway. The volumes may differ at either end of the section as a result of a particular type of land use activity or traffic distribution pattern. The AADT volumes posted with an E (estimated value) are not intended for design purposes. DEFINITIONS A Actual tube count conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Seamless, Sustainable, Smart Reimagining Novato’S Public Transportation Network
    Seamless, Sustainable, Smart Reimagining Novato’s Public Transportation Network Anthony Nachor Urban and Regional Planning San Jose State University December 2019 Seamless, Sustainable, Smart: Reimagining Novato’s Public Transportation Network A Planning Report Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Urban and Regional Planning San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree Masters of Urban Planning Anthony Nachor 13 December 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................vii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... x 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Novato: A Primer ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. A Sprawling Community ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT MTA CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION -- Line 1 Primary Construction Program PROJECT: MARC Maintenance, Layover, & Storage Facilities
    MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL PROGRAM SUMMARY ($ MILLIONS) SIX - YEAR Fiscal 2021 Fiscal 2022 Fiscal 2023 Fiscal 2024 Fiscal 2025 Fiscal 2026 TOTAL Construction Program Major Projects 494.3 433.9 313.1 237.7 238.1 177.8 1,894.9 System Preservation Minor Projects 87.2 65.7 52.9 153.0 139.5 65.4 563.7 Development & Evaluation Program 3.0 0.9 0.4 0.2 1.5 1.8 7.7 SUBTOTAL 584.5 500.5 366.4 390.9 379.1 245.0 2,466.3 Capital Salaries, Wages & Other Costs 12.5 12.5 13.0 14.0 14.0 15.0 81.0 TOTAL 597.0 513.0 379.4 404.9 393.1 260.0 2,547.3 Special Funds 14.9 25.2 145.7 235.0 212.2 98.1 731.2 Federal Funds 510.8 436.9 218.6 169.9 180.8 161.8 1,678.9 Other Funds 71.2 51.0 15.1 - - - 137.2 * For Minors breakdown, please refer to the System Preservation Minor Projects Program report. MARC Freight Light Rail Baltimore Metro Bus Multi-Modal Locally Operated Transit Systems MDOT MTA CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION -- Line 1 Primary Construction Program PROJECT: MARC Maintenance, Layover, & Storage Facilities DESCRIPTION: Planning, environmental documentation, design, property acquisition, and construction of maintenance, layover, and storage facilities. Includes design and acquisition of property at MARC Martin State Airport facility for future development and the acquisition and construction of a heavy maintenance building at the Riverside. PURPOSE & NEED SUMMARY STATEMENT: Projects will provide critically needed maintenance facility for the MARC fleet as well as real estate for future development required to store MARC trainsets.
    [Show full text]
  • Park-And-Ride Lots Guide
    Park & Ride Commuter Lots Serving I-270 and US 29 Corridors in Montgomery County, Maryland A Handy Guide to FREE PARKING and an Easier Commute To Work! Revised October 2014 Please Note: Information in this guide is an outline of transportation services; resource information, bus & train schedules are subject to change. Please refer to your specific routes schedule or timetable for additional information. The Park and Ride Lot Maps were prepared by the Department of Technology Services Geographic Information Systems Table of Contents PARK & RIDE LOTS in the Montgomery County US 29 Corridor and Vicinity Burtonsville .................................................................... 3 Briggs Chaney .................................................................4 Greencastle .....................................................................5 Tech Road .......................................................................6 PARK & RIDE LOTS in the Montgomery County I-270 Corridor and Vicinity Westfield Shoppingtown Montgomery ........................... 7 (Montgomery Mall) Montrose Parking/MD 355 Parking Facility .....................9 Lakeforest Transit Center ...............................................10 Gaithersburg (I-270 & MD 124) ....................................11 Germantown/MARC Station ..........................................12 Germantown/Kingsview ................................................13 Germantown Transit Center (GTC) ................................14 Germantown/Milestone Shopping Center .....................16
    [Show full text]