2020 Construction Program
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The UPPER SHENANGO RIVER WATER TRAIL DETAILED
The UPPER SHENANGO RIVER WATER TRAIL DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION The upper Shenango River runs from its origin at Pymatuning State Park’s Shenango Reservoir dam, downstream and south to the Corps of Engineer’s Lake Shenango Reservoir. This is an “as the river flows” reach of some 26 miles. Historically, the river was both a commercial and recreational resource. Parts of it were components of the Erie Canal. Much structure from locks and towpaths still exist along the river. It transported trade goods, powered gristmills, and supplied clean water to various communities. Residents swam in it, dived from its bridges, and picnicked along it. More contemporaneously, it hosted canoe races, casual canoe and kayak trips, all sorts of fishers, and duck hunters. The Borough of Greenville uses it as it’s principal source of domestic water. Other pubic water suppliers who draw upon the Shenango are the Reynolds Water Company, Sharpsville Borough Water Company, and others farther down the river. At present, and in the recent past, none of these attributes are reasonably available to the public due to the severe number and extent of the blockages now obstructing the river. It is the mission of the Shenango River Watchers, Inc. (“SRW”) to re-open the channel, and then improve access to the river. We will then raise public awareness of the river’s attributes by bringing it into the Pennsylvania Water Trail system. The following comments and quotations reflect upon the inherent value of preserving the Shenango River watershed for broadly drawn environmental reasons. A Water Trail exists within, and contributes to, protecting and enhancing these virtues, whether threatened by environmental degradation or simply unknown to the general public. -
Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Beaver River
Information Sheet for Beaver River Page 1 of 3 Information Sheet Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Beaver River What is being proposed? A Total Maximum Daily Load or TMDL plan has been developed to improve the water quality in the Beaver River basin. Who is proposing the plan? To whom? Why? The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is proposing to submit the plan to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for review and approval as required by the federal regulations. In 1995, EPA was sued for not developing TMDLs when Pennsylvania did not do so. DEP has entered into an agreement with EPA to develop TMDLs for certain specified waters over the next several years. DEP developed this TMDL in compliance with the state/EPA agreement. What is a TMDL? A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) sets a ceiling on the pollutant loads that can enter a waterbody so that the water will meet water quality standards. The Clean Water Act requires states to list all waters that do not meet their water quality standards even after pollution controls required by law are in place. For these waters, the state must calculate how much of a substance can be put in the water without violating the standard, and then distribute that quantity among all the sources of the pollutant on that waterbody. A TMDL plan includes waste load allocations for point sources, load allocations for nonpoint sources and a margin of safety. The Clean Water Act requires states to submit their TMDLs to EPA for approval. Also, if a state does not develop the TMDL, the Clean Water Act states that EPA must do so. -
The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C
The Principal Indian Towns of Western Pennsylvania C. Hale Sipe One cannot travel far in Western Pennsylvania with- out passing the sites of Indian towns, Delaware, Shawnee and Seneca mostly, or being reminded of the Pennsylvania Indians by the beautiful names they gave to the mountains, streams and valleys where they roamed. In a future paper the writer will set forth the meaning of the names which the Indians gave to the mountains, valleys and streams of Western Pennsylvania; but the present paper is con- fined to a brief description of the principal Indian towns in the western part of the state. The writer has arranged these Indian towns in alphabetical order, as follows: Allaquippa's Town* This town, named for the Seneca, Queen Allaquippa, stood at the mouth of Chartier's Creek, where McKees Rocks now stands. In the Pennsylvania, Colonial Records, this stream is sometimes called "Allaquippa's River". The name "Allaquippa" means, as nearly as can be determined, "a hat", being likely a corruption of "alloquepi". This In- dian "Queen", who was visited by such noted characters as Conrad Weiser, Celoron and George Washington, had var- ious residences in the vicinity of the "Forks of the Ohio". In fact, there is good reason for thinking that at one time she lived right at the "Forks". When Washington met her while returning from his mission to the French, she was living where McKeesport now stands, having moved up from the Ohio to get farther away from the French. After Washington's surrender at Fort Necessity, July 4th, 1754, she and the other Indian inhabitants of the Ohio Val- ley friendly to the English, were taken to Aughwick, now Shirleysburg, where they were fed by the Colonial Author- ities of Pennsylvania. -
Reading Stephen King: Issues of Censorship, Student Choice, and Popular Literature
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 414 606 CS 216 137 AUTHOR Power, Brenda Miller, Ed.; Wilhelm, Jeffrey D., Ed.; Chandler, Kelly, Ed. TITLE Reading Stephen King: Issues of Censorship, Student Choice, and Popular Literature. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. ISBN ISBN-0-8141-3905-1 PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 246p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 39051-0015: $14.95 members, $19.95 nonmembers). PUB TYPE Collected Works - General (020) Opinion Papers (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Censorship; Critical Thinking; *Fiction; Literature Appreciation; *Popular Culture; Public Schools; Reader Response; *Reading Material Selection; Reading Programs; Recreational Reading; Secondary Education; *Student Participation IDENTIFIERS *Contemporary Literature; Horror Fiction; *King (Stephen); Literary Canon; Response to Literature; Trade Books ABSTRACT This collection of essays grew out of the "Reading Stephen King Conference" held at the University of Mainin 1996. Stephen King's books have become a lightning rod for the tensions around issues of including "mass market" popular literature in middle and 1.i.gh school English classes and of who chooses what students read. King's fi'tion is among the most popular of "pop" literature, and among the most controversial. These essays spotlight the ways in which King's work intersects with the themes of the literary canon and its construction and maintenance, censorship in public schools, and the need for adolescent readers to be able to choose books in school reading programs. The essays and their authors are: (1) "Reading Stephen King: An Ethnography of an Event" (Brenda Miller Power); (2) "I Want to Be Typhoid Stevie" (Stephen King); (3) "King and Controversy in Classrooms: A Conversation between Teachers and Students" (Kelly Chandler and others); (4) "Of Cornflakes, Hot Dogs, Cabbages, and King" (Jeffrey D. -
Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL -
Mercy Behavioral Health Training and Development Department Location
Mercy Behavioral Health Training and Development Department Location & Directions Our Location Mercy Behavioral Health Training and Development Department 249 South 9th Street 2nd Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15203 412.488.4374 Free parking is available in our parking lot and in adjacent lots. Limited on-street parking is available on South 9th and South 10th streets. Our location is so new that it may not appear on all GPS systems or on internet map searches, however, directions are provided below. It may be possible to enter 330 South 9th Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15203 in to a map search engine as it is one of our facilities located across the street. Directions from the North From PA Route 28 North Head west on PA Route 28 South toward Exit 5. Take the Interstate 579 South exit toward Liberty Bridge/Chestnut Street. Keep left at the fork and merge onto I-579 South. Take the Seventh Avenue Exit toward Sixth Avenue/Downtown. Keep left at the fork and follow signs for CONSOL Energy Center/Sixth Avenue. Merge onto Bigelow Boulevard. Continue onto Ross Street. Turn left onto Forbes Avenue. Turn right onto South 10th Street/Armstrong Tunnel. Continue to follow South 10th Street across the bridge. Take the first right after the bridge onto Bingham Street. Take the first right onto South 9th Street. Travel three blocks. The Training and Development Department of Mercy Behavioral Health is located in the last building on the right before the railroad tracks. The 10th Street Bridge will be on your right. The Training and Development Department is located on the second floor. -
__History of Kew Depot and It's Routes
HISTORY OF KEW DEPOT AND ITS ROUTES Page 1 HISTORY of KEW DEPOT and the ROUTES OPERATED by KEW Compiled and written by Hugh Waldron MCILT CA 1500 The word tram and tramway are derived from Scottish words indicating the type of truck and the tracks used in coal mines. 1807 The first Horse tram service in the world commences operation between Swansea and Mumbles in Wales. 12th September 1854 At 12.20 pm first train departs Flinders Street Station for Sandridge (Port Melbourne) First Steam operated railway line in Australia. The line is eventually converted to tram operation during December 1987 between the current Southbank Depot and Port Melbourne. The first rail lines in Australia operated in Newcastle Collieries operated by horses in 1829. Then a five-mile line on the Tasman Peninsula opened in 1836 and powered by convicts pushing the rail vehicle. The next line to open was on 18/5/1854 in South Australia (Goolwa) and operated by horses. 1864 Leonard John Flannagan was born in Richmond. After graduating he became an Architect and was responsible for being the Architect building Malvern Depot 1910, Kew Depot 1915 and Hawthorn Depot 1916. He died 2nd November 1945. September 1873 First cable tramway in the world opens in Clay Street, San Francisco, USA. 1877 Steam tramways commence. Victoria only had two steam tramways both opened 1890 between Sorrento Pier to Sorrento Back Beach closed on 20th March 1921 (This line also operated horse trams when passenger demand was not high.) and Bendigo to Eaglehawk converted to electric trams in 1903. -
ATTACHMENT 1: Site Directions Detailed Written Directions to the Site Washington County
ATTACHMENT 1: Site Directions Detailed Written Directions to the Site Washington County From the DEP Southwest Regional Office to Ross Road Block Valve (354 Ross Road, Eighty Four, PA 15330): Head south on Waterfront Drive (0.2 mi). Slight right onto 30th St Bridge (476ft). Turn right onto River Ave (148 ft). Turn left onto 31st St Bridge (154 ft). Turn left onto the Pennsylvania 28 ramp (0.2mi). Merge onto PA‐28 S (0.9mi). Take the Interstate 279 S/Interstate 376 W exit (0.4 mi). Merge onto I‐279 S (0.9 mi). Take the exit onto I‐376 W/Fort Pitt Bridge (5.7 mi). Take exit 64A to merge onto I‐79 S toward Washington (13.6mi). Take exit 45 toward PA‐980/Canonsburg (0.2 mi). Turn left onto McClelland Rd (1.2 mi). Turn left onto US‐19 N (1.0 mi). Turn right onto Waterdam Rd (2.3 mi). Slight right onto Thomas Rd (0.5 mi). Turn right onto Ross Rd (0.8 mi). The Ross Road Block Valve will be on the left about 0.8 miles down the road. From the Washington County Conservation District to Ross Road Block Valve (354 Ross Road, Eighty Four, PA 15330): Head southeast on N Main St toward Country Club Rd (75 ft). Turn left onto Country Club Rd (0.9 mi). Turn left onto Pike St (0.7 mi). Turn right onto Racetrack Rd (1.5 mi). Turn left onto US‐19 N (2.5 mi). Turn right onto Linden Rd (2.6 mi). -
Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial -
“3Rd Annual UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine Conference” (MD21)
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic of UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine/Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Office of Educational Resources and Planning University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Center for Continuing Education in the Health Sciences Community Care Behavioral Health Organization “3rd Annual UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine Conference” (MD21) Saturday, April 21, 2018 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Thomas E. Starzl Biomedical Science Tower South Room S120 University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Course Directors: Priya Gopalan, MD Pierre Azzam, MD Recovery and Wellness: The Journey Starts Here A Joint Effort Sponsored by Community Care Behavioral Health Organization and Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic of UPMC UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine April 21, 2018 Biomedical Science Tower Introduction Psychosomatic medicine remains a challenging field. Subspecialty areas in psychosomatic medicine make it more complicated to diagnose, treat, and refer patients with complex medical comorbidities. Providers need to provide best practice comprehensive psychiatric consultation evaluations with thorough consideration of psychiatric, medical, and psychosocial factors. The UPMC Psychosomatic Medicine Conference is a one-day meeting that will highlight local and regional talent in consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatry. Through dynamic speakers and experts in the field, it will provide an update on clinical care and research at the interface of psychiatry and other medical specialties. These will include primary care services, integrated care, the opioid epidemic and mindfulness, and special populations such as pediatrics, transgender care, psycho-oncology, and pain and psychiatry. The conference will give an up-to-date overview of community resources in addition to research studies in the area of psychosomatic medicine to enable participants to incorporate them into individual practice and discern their applicability to clinical care. -
Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing -
Operations and Financial Analysis
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APRIL 22, 2015 PREPARED BY: LOUIS BERGER WATER SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B) OPERATIONS ANALYSIS C) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS D) APPENDICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Louis Berger was tasked by the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) to evaluate the Charm City Circulator (CCC) bus operation and analyze financial performance, and develop route operations alternatives that maximize ridership while minimizing costs. Objective The objective is to develop and evaluate alternatives to eliminate the annual deficits while providing maximum service to riders within existing financial resources. Description of Current System Existing Condition The CCC consists of four routes, Purple, Orange, Green and Banner providing “Fast. Friendly. Free.” service throughout downtown Baltimore 362 days per year, with hours of service varying by day type and by season. Key characteristics of each route: Purple Route- runs north - south from Federal Hill to Historic Mount Vernon. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses to operate. Heaviest ridership of all the routes. Orange Route- runs east – west from Historic Fell’s Point and Harbor Point in the east beyond University of Maryland, Baltimore in the west. Ten (10) minute headways require five (5) buses to operate. Ridership is second best in the system. Green Route- roughly U shaped route serves Johns Hopkins University Hospital East Baltimore Campus (JHUH) connecting south to Harbor Point and Harbor East, then northwest to park and ride lots, looping down near City Center then back around. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses. Longest route, least productive in terms of riders. Banner Route- angles southeast of the city past Federal Hill to Fort McHenry.