DOCSLIB.ORG

Ridership Forecasting Technical Report Prepared By: VHB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ridership Forecasting Technical Report Prepared By: VHB APPENDIX L Ridership Forecasting Technical Report Prepared by: VHB I-90 Allston Interchange Project Draft Environmental Impact Report Ridership Forecasting Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 1 Key Assumptions .......................................................................................................................... 1 Transit Capacity Analysis Approach ........................................................................................... 3 Commuter Rail ...................................................................................................................... 5 Rapid Transit ......................................................................................................................... 6 MBTA Local Bus and Shuttle Bus ......................................................................................... 6 RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 6 Ridership ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Transit Capacity ........................................................................................................................... 8 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS .......................................................................................11 Ridership ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Transit Capacity ......................................................................................................................... 12 ATTACHMENT A CTPS Methodology and Assumptions of Regional Travel Demand Modeling Memorandum ATTACHMENT B CTPS Model Validation Process Memorandum ATTACHMENT C CTPS Transit Network Assumptions Memorandum ATTACHMENT D CTPS Land Use Assumptions Memorandum ATTACHMENT E CTPS Transit Crowding Analysis i I-90 Allston Interchange Project Draft Environmental Impact Report Ridership Forecasting Technical Report INTRODUCTION This Ridership Forecasting Technical Report has been prepared in support of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the I-90 Allston Interchange Project (the Project). The purpose of this report is to document the methodology used to determine the ridership forecasts and associated transit capacity impacts for MBTA services and other transit services to be operating at the proposed West Station and in the study area to support the planning, environmental review, and preliminary design efforts for the Project. Ridership forecasts were developed for the future No Build and Build Alternatives, for the project’s 2025 Opening Year and 2040 Design Year. METHODOLOGY Ridership forecasts and transit capacity impact analyses for the Project were developed using standard transportation planning industry practice for the evaluation of transportation systems and infrastructure. The analysis was based on the development of existing conditions and future year travel demand forecasts provided by the Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS). CTPS is the staff to the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Boston Region and works with the communities within the region to address issues relating to transportation, land use, and economic development. CTPS develops and maintains the regional transportation demand model. CTPS’s method of travel demand forecasting follows the traditional four steps of trip generation, trip distribution, modal split, and travel assignment, and uses EMME software to run the travel demand model. A detailed summary of the travel demand model methodology utilized by CTPS is provided in Attachment A. Details of the process used to validate the regional travel demand model for the Project are contained in Attachment B. For the Project, CTPS provided a calibrated baseline, or existing condition, and developed No Build and Build Alternative ridership forecasts for the 2025 Opening Year and 2040 Design Year. CTPS also developed forecasts for vehicle loading on commuter rail, rapid transit, local bus, and shuttle bus services operating in the study area to analyze potential passenger crowding impacts. To support the ridership modeling and transit capacity analyses, the Project: • Provided CTPS with inputs for the development of ridership estimates, including future transit service levels and future land use data in the project vicinity. Descriptions of the service level and land use assumptions used for the modeling efforts are contained in Attachment C and Attachment D, respectively. • Reviewed outputs from CTPS and provided feedback to clarify and refine results. KEY ASSUMPTIONS The 2040 travel demand forecasts provided by CTPS assume the implementation of several transportation projects by 2040, consistent with the currently adopted Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) of the Boston Region MPO, Charting Progress to 2040 (2015). For a full listing of the transit-related projects in the region included in the CTPS model for the 2040 1 I-90 Allston Interchange Project Draft Environmental Impact Report Ridership Forecasting Technical Report Design Year, please see Attachment C. The future improvements that are likely to have the greatest influence within or adjacent to the Project study area include: • Increased Service on the Worcester Main Line • Green Line Extension to College Avenue and Union Square in Somerville The 2040 No Build Alternative does not include the proposed West Station. Also, no significant changes in MBTA bus services within or adjacent to the project area are expected to occur by 2040 in the No Build Alternative. The 2040 Build Alternatives assume the opening of the proposed West Station, which would be a new stop on the MBTA’s Worcester/Framingham Line (Worcester Line) commuter rail service. MassDOT developed a proposed commuter rail schedule which meets the MBTA’s Service Delivery Policy1 of providing at least three morning and three afternoon peak period, peak direction train stops at the proposed West Station. The MBTA’s service policy also includes provision of 180-minute headways at a minimum during off-peak periods. The proposed Worcester Line schedule is included in Attachment C, and assumes that some Worcester Line trains would stop at the new Boston Landing Station at New Balance as well as at the proposed West Station. Several commuter rail peak period trains would run express through both stations. New Urban Rail train service was not incorporated within the ridership model horizon, because a future build year is not determined and service frequency has not been defined. The 2040 Build model scenarios tested various interchange and roadway network options, including the base interchange alternative, an interchange alternative that includes a new roadway connection to Commonwealth Avenue, and an alternative that restricts portions of Stadium Way for transit vehicles only (southbound between Western Avenue and Cambridge Street South). Bus service to West Station was also modeled, including the addition of new shuttle lines assumed to be operating in the project area. The shuttle bus assumptions incorporated into the CTPS model vary depending on the modeled scenario, as follows: • In the 2025 No Build, 2025 Build and 2040 No Build alternatives, one new shuttle bus route between Harvard Square and Barry’s Corner in Allston was assumed to operate at 10-minute headways during the daytime and 20-minute headways during the Night Period2. • In the 2040 Build base interchange alternative and the alternative with transit restrictions on Stadium Way, three new shuttle routes were assumed, including: o One new Harvard Shuttle route between Harvard Square and West Station, operating at 5-minute headways during the AM and PM Peak Periods, 15-minute headways during the Midday Period3, and 20-minute headways during the Night Period. o One new Kendall Shuttle route between Kendall Square and West Station via Central Square, operating at 5-minute headways during the AM and PM Peak 1 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Service Delivery Policy. June 2, 2010. www.mbta.com 2 Night Period: 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM 3 Midday Period: 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM 2 I-90 Allston Interchange Project Draft Environmental Impact Report Ridership Forecasting Technical Report Periods, 15-minute headways during the Midday, and 20-minute headways during the Night Period. o One new LMA Shuttle route between Ruggles Station and West Station via the Longwood Medical Area, operating at 5-minute headways during the AM and PM Peak Periods, 15-minute headways during the Midday, and 20-minute headways during the Night Period. • In the 2040 interchange alternative with a new roadway connection to Commonwealth Avenue, two new shuttle routes were assumed: o One new Harvard Shuttle route between Harvard Square and West Station, operating at 5-minute headways during the AM and PM Peak Periods, 15-minute headways during the Midday, and 20-minute headways during the Night Period. o One new Kendall-LMA Shuttle between Kendall Square and West Station via Ruggles Station and the Longwood Medical Area, operating at 5-minute headways during the AM and PM Peak Periods, 15-minute headways during the Midday, and 20-minute headways during the Night Period. Bus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Actions to Transform Mobility
    Actions to Transform Mobility TRANSPORT KENDALL Navigating the Growth and Transformation of Kendall Square Introduction The Kendall Square has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past 40 years. The scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs in Kendall Square together have created one of the most dynamic innovation districts in the world. Kendall’s innovation ecosystem is dependent on the talent and resources of institutions and companies located in close proximity. Close connections to Boston’s medical centers, investment resources, and education institutions have likewise been invaluable. Kendall Square has become central to Massachusetts’s economy attracting talent from every corner of the state, however Kendall is not as geographically central within the regional transit system as downtown Boston. Despite this, Kendall has grown from one red line station into a model transit-oriented development district with a truly multi-modal commute pattern, supported by the City of Cambridge’s progressive parking and transportation demand policies. Kendall has spurred the emergence of new districts focused on life science and technology innovation throughout the region. The state’s economic growth is dependent on reliable transportation connections between where people live and work. Transport Kendall seeks to maintain and enhance the transit-oriented development model in Cambridge. To do this, Transport Kendall promotes future investment in the transit system to serve this economic hub, while relieving congestion and supporting regional
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Advisory Committee Minutes November 2014
    CITY OF CAMBRIDGE TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES Date, Time & Place: November 5, 2014, 5:30-7:30 PM Cambridge Citywide Senior Center, 2nd floor Kitchen Classroom Attendance Committee Members John Attanucci, Kelley Brown, Brian Dacey, Charles Fineman, Jim Gascoigne, Eric Hoke, Doug Manz, George Metzger, Katherine Rafferty, Simon Shapiro, Saul Tannenbaum, Ritesh Warade City of Cambridge Adam Shulman (Traffic, Parking and Transportation); Tegin Teich Bennett, Susanne Rasmussen, Jennifer Lawrence, and Cleo Stoughton (Community Development Department) 1 member of the public was present. Committee Introductions and Approve Minutes Attachment: Draft October minutes Committee Updates Kendall Square Mobility Task Force RFR released Tegin informed the Committee that MassDOT had released an RFR to form a Kendall Square Transportation Task Force to identify short-, medium-, and long-term projects and policy initiatives to improve transportation in Kendall Square. BRT Study Group meeting October 17, 2014 Tegin updated the Committee on the progress of a study group to look at the feasibility of implementing BRT in Boston. Updates on MBTA coordination: Transit Service Analysis, EV technology The City has been discussing the progress of implementing bus priority treatments at a couple locations in Boston and has asked for information on their effectiveness. The MBTA is interested in piloting electric vehicle technology and the City is working with them to help identify possible funding sources. Pearl Street Reconnection and Dana Park Hubway solicitation for input The City is seeking input on the Pearl Street Reconstruction project. More information can be found here: https://www.cambridgema.gov/theworks/cityprojects/2014/pearlstreetreconstruction.aspx. The City is seeking input on options for the long-term location of the Dana Park Hubway station.
    [Show full text]
  • South Station Expansion Project
    On page 2 of the WWTR, the Proponent reports in the Boston Water & Sewer Commission's (BWSC) assessment that there is adequate capacity in its sewer mains to collect and convey the Project's new wastewater flows, which could increase wastewater fl ow contribution from the site by as much as 453,150 gallons per day (gpd) at the South Station site, an increase of 122% from existing conditions, according to the WWTR. This may be true for 5.1 dry weather flow conditions, but downstream BWSC and MWRA sewer systems serving South Station and the other project areas can surcharge and overflow during large storms, due to large volumes of stormwater entering combined sewer systems. Any increase in sanitary flow, if not offset with infiltration/inflow ("III") or stormwater removal from hydraulically related sewer systems can be expected to worsen system surcharging and overflows. The WWTR separately describes local and state regulations requiring I/I removal at a ratio of 4 gallons III removed for every new gallon of sanitary flow to ensure the mitigation of these potential impacts. The Proponent commits to 4: 1 I/I removal to offset new wastewater flows generated at the South Station site. I/I removal from hydraulically related systems may occur remote from the project site. It is imperative that the Proponent evaluate how the local sewers to which the project's flows will be connected will perform with the large added flows from the project and the III reduction that may occur far afield. Connections to the BWSC sewer 5.2 pipes should be carefully selected to ensure that any local sewer surcharging is not worsened by the new flows in a way that causes greater CSO discharges at nearby CSO regulators and outfalls,.notwithstanding the removal of extraneous flows elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston to Providence Commuter Rail Schedule
    Boston To Providence Commuter Rail Schedule Giacomo beseechings downward. Dimitrou shrieved her convert dolce, she detach it prenatally. Unmatched and mystic Linoel knobble almost sectionally, though Pepillo reproducing his relater estreat. Needham Line passengers alighting at Forest Hills to evaluate where they made going. Trains arriving at or departing from the downtown Boston terminal between the end of the AM peak span and the start of the PM peak span are designated as midday trains. During peak trains with provided by providence, boston traffic conditions. Produced by WBUR and NPR. Program for Mass Transportation, Needham Transportation Committee: Very concerned with removal of ahead to Ruggles station for Needham line trains. Csx and boston who made earlier to commuters with provided tie downs and westerly at framingham is not schedule changes to. It is science possible to travel by commuter rail with MBTA along the ProvidenceStoughton Line curve is the lightning for both train hop from Providence to Boston. Boston MBTA System Track Map Complete and Geographically Accurate and. Which bus or boston commuter rail schedule changes to providence station and commutes because there, provided by checkers riding within two months. Read your favorite comics from Comics Kingdom. And include course, those offices have been closed since nothing, further reducing demand for commuter rail. No lines feed into both the North and South Stations. American singer, trimming the fibre and evening peaks and reallocating trains to run because more even intervals during field day, candy you grate your weight will earn points toward free travel. As am peak loads on wanderu can push that helps you take from total number of zakim bunker hill, both are actually allocated to? MBTA Providence Commuter Train The MBTA Commuter Rail trains run between Boston and Providence on time schedule biased for extra working in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • I-90 Allston Scoping Report 11-6-19
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Project Area and Elements ............................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Project History .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Regulatory Framework ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.1 Overview of the NEPA Process.......................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Purpose of the Scoping Report ......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Opportunity for Public Comment ................................................................................................................ 6 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Project Need .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts and Rhode Island Chapter Newsletter
    May 2018 Massachusetts and Rhode Island Chapter Newsletter PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE UPCOMING EDUCATION In Like A Lion, Out Like a Lion by Bud Clarke, MAI 2018 President 7 Hour National USPAP Update Course (2018 - 2019) The month of March recently came in like a lion and out like a lion, not a lamb! New England's June 7, 2018 third nor'easter in less than two weeks slammed parts of the region and dropped as much as 2 Warwick, RI feet of snow in some places and brought dangerous whiteout conditions on the roads. Solving Land Puzzles June 13, 2018 Hurricane force wind gusts were severe in places as much of coastal Massachusetts, Rhode Waltham, MA Island, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Maine bore the brunt of the storms. Low lying coastal areas experienced significant flooding and damage, while communities all over the Real Estate Finance Statistics and Valuation Modeling region experienced flooding, falling trees, and power outages. June 14 – 15, 2018 Woburn, MA The aftermath of these storms left damaged homes, breached seawalls, and wreckage scattered in the streets, with generator-powered pumps sucking saltwater from flooded Basic Appraisal Procedures basements. Shattered fences and broken trees littered yard after yard. June 20 – 23, 2018 Braintree, MA Disasters tend to occur suddenly, taking the public by surprise, even when the location is 7 Hour National USPAP Update known to be prone to such an occurrence. Depending on the nature of the disaster, Course (2018-2019) destruction of property may be widespread and to varying degrees. Initially, the collective June 28, 2018 Woburn, MA reaction to any disaster is shock; however eventually, there is recovery and damaged property needs to be repaired and destroyed property is often replaced.
    [Show full text]
  • Allston Yards
    Allston Yards Allston Yards May 29, 2018 Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards Site Plan Enhancements MBTA • Commuter Rail • Busses Shuttles Parking Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards – April 30, 2018 plan Braintree Street Extension Building 4 Building 3 Building 1 East Street East West Street West Arthur Arthur Extension Street Lantera (residential) 52 Everett Street Building 2 38 Everett Street Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards – April 30, 2018 plan Car drop-off area 5-foot wide sidewalk Building 4 Building 3 Building 1 East Street East West Street West Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards – May 29, 2018 plan Car / shuttle bus 10-foot wide sidewalk drop-off area 8-foot wide landscaping Curb extensions Curb extensions Building 4 Building 3 Building 1 East Street East West Street West Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards – MBTA Outreach April 30, 2018 meeting Request for Boston Landing Station access enhancements Request for MBTA Route 64 modifications May 21, 2018 – four new stops added at Boston Landing: • Inbound #500 – approx. 6:04 AM • Outbound #511 – flag stop; approx. 10:31 PM • Outbound #513 – flag stop; approx. 12:11 PM • Outbound #515 – flag stop; approx. 2:16 PM Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts MBTA Boston Landing Station – Update Boston Landing 2013 2 AM inbound / 2 PM outbound (planned) 2017 May 22, 2017 opening 2017 October 2017 700 – 900 daily riders Tuesday April 24, 2018 = 1,153 riders 2018 19 inbound / 15 outbound stops 20
    [Show full text]
  • By Thomas Jensen May 11, 2018 - Appraisal & Consulting
    Boston Landing - A public private partnership success- by Thomas Jensen May 11, 2018 - Appraisal & Consulting Thomas Jensen, Integra Realty Resources The Massachusetts and Rhode Island Chapter of the Appraisal Institute will be holding a two-hour continuing education event at 2:30 PM on May 23rd within the Boston Bruins training facility at 80 Guest St. in Brighton. Panelist will include: Erin Harvey, senior leasing agent of NB Development; Keith Craig, project manager, New Balance Development; Ellen DeNooyer, senior project manager, MBTA; and James Parker, associate team counsel, Boston Celtics. Boston Landing is home of the Boston Bruins’ and soon to be Boston Celtics’ practice facilities. Following CE program, participants are invited for networking, cocktails and light refreshments, at Brighton Bowl, a new candlepin bowling alley, located in Flatbreads at 75 Guest St. The program will feature an overview of NB Development’s mixed-use Boston Landing complex with focus of the MBTA’s Public Private Partnership (P3) in constructing the new commuter rail station. It will also focus on the station’s impact on marketability and value as a transit-oriented development. Finally, the program will also discuss the new transit station as a catalyst for the overall neighborhood’s redevelopment. Public sector budgets are always under pressure and governmental agencies increasingly seek to fund development projects and infrastructure construction through public-private partnerships (“PPPs”). Public-private partnerships for infrastructure are more common in other regions of the world, but such partnerships are less common in the U.S. because there has often been public money set aside for these projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 I-90 Allston Interchange Project DEIR
    1 3 Alternatives Analysis Summary of Preferred Alternative Concept Development The Preferred Alternative Urban Interchange 3K was developed sequentially, beginning ENF 3 Chapter with the results of the Alternatives Analysis described in Attachment 9 of the DEIR FEIR Environmental Notification Form (ENF). The ENF described the then-preferred Urban (PUBLISHED OCTOBER 2014) Interchange 3J Series concept, which included three components: the reconstruction and realignment of the I-90 interchange, the reconstruction of a rail layover facility at Beacon Park Yard (BPY), and the construction of a new commuter rail station, designated as West Station. The features of the ENF 3J Series Preferred Alternative Group 1 & 2 | Suburban Style Interchange are illustrated in Figure 3-1 (provided at the end of the chapter). Secretary’s After the publication of the ENF, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation Dismissed from further study: Certificate MassDOT (MassDOT) continued refining and enhancing the Project concept. The Secretary’s – on the ENF Occupied a large amount of space modifies Task Force requests Certificate on the ENF provided guidance and suggestions to improve the 3J Series –Did not fit the urban context 3J Series Member MassDOT concept. Project stakeholder input from the Task Force, ongoing public participation, to address Alternative –Did not accommodate future land development to evaluate inter-agency collaboration, and coordination with Harvard University and abutters Secretary’s Concepts –Did not accommodate multi-modal connections a modified provided additional approaches and ideas. comments 3J Alternative Taking all of this input into consideration, MassDOT developed the current 3K Preferred in DEIR Alternative with three variations for the Throat Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 Meeting of the Ad Hoc Town Council
    Meeting of the Ad Hoc Town Council Committee on Transportation March 29, 2017 – Philip Pane Lower Conference Room Summary Report for May 9, 2017 The Ad Hoc Committee on Transportation was asked to engage the MBTA on a list of questions to improve the transit rider experience in Watertown. The meeting convened at 6:30 pm and the full list of guests from the MBTA, VHB, elected officials and the general public is available in a more detailed report from Committee Secretary Palomba (Attachment A). The published agenda and list of topics is included in Attachment B. In a general sense, the discussed items included, 1. The transit-related recommendations from the MassDOT Arsenal Corridor Study- (a) A proposed express bus route from Watertown Square to the Boston Landing commuter rail station in Allston; (b) More frequent 70/70A bus trips; (c) Splitting up of the 70/70A routes into 3 separate smaller routes. The relevant PowerPoint slides or interest that came from VHB’s last project working group meeting are attached (Attachment C). 2. The MBTA's Service Delivery Planning Policy- The speaker described the distinct elements of the MBTA’s new Service Delivery Plan Policy: the Service Plan changes and Quarterly Service changes. Watertown may be able to work with the MBTA to see some of the recommendations from the MassDOT/VHB Study in both of these types of service planning. The slides presented by the MBTA across all of the topics at the meeting are appended to the report in Attachment D. 3. The MBTA's next generation of fare-collection technology- The agenda item of off-bus fare collection was covered with this presentation from the MBTA.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanded Comments on the City of Boston Placemaking Study Comments Submitted to the BRA on July 14, 2016
    Expanded Comments on the City of Boston Placemaking Study Comments submitted to the BRA on July 14, 2016 A Better City is pleased to comment on the Placemaking Study conducted by the City of Boston and its consultants, supported by MassDOT, as presented to the I-90 Allston Interchange Task Force on June 27, 2016 and further discussed with the Task Force on July 13, 2016. The Placemaking Study places due emphasis on the Interchange project as both a transportation initiative and a community development opportunity that over time will immeasurably improve the immediate Allston Neighborhood as well as create a vital new quarter for the City and region as a whole. We hope that the dialogue begun by the Placemaking Study will continue during the preparation of the Draft EIR and beyond as the designs for the area are further developed and implemented. The listed placemaking issues cover and summarize the range well. A Better City has developed and advanced an at-grade alternative in the “throat” area, which we believe is a key issue that will affect constructability, initial construction and on- going maintenance costs, and the nature of connections across the area, and we are pleased that your analysis has indicated that this is a key placemaking issue. Each of the other issues listed is also very important, several of which are critical to the success of West Station as a multi-modal hub that will support future development as well as enhance transit service for the adjacent neighborhoods and institutions. The listed goals are all laudable and necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Core Committee Core Inner WHAT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS DID the MPO IDENTIFY in ICC COMMUNITIES?
    Inner Core Committee • Milton • Melrose • Malden • Medford • Lynn • Chelsea Everett • Brookline • Cambridge • Belmont • Boston Arlington (ICC) Winthrop • Watertown • • Saugus • QuincyWaltham • SomervilleNeedham • Newton • Revere • Identifying Transportation Needs, Construction Projects, and Studies in Your Subregion Winter 2020 ON REG ST IO O N B M E N T O R I O T P A O IZ LMPOI N TA A N G P OR LANNING WHAT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS DID THE MPO IDENTIFY IN ICC COMMUNITIES? The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) conducted an assessment of transportation needs in the Boston region to inform the MPO’s current Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Destination 2040, adopted in August 2019. MPO staff identified existing transportation conditions and made projections of future conditions and demand on the system. MPO staff also reached out to various subregional groups to discuss their transportation needs and opportunities to improve transportation in their communities. The resulting LRTP Needs Assessment serves as a tool for planning the region’s future transportation network, and for prioritizing the MPO’s limited funding for transportation projects and studies. The tables that follow highlight some of the transportation needs identified in the ICC subregion based on MPO analysis, and the lists below highlight needs identified from past visits to ICC communities for the Needs Assessment. For more information, please refer to the Destination 2040 Needs Assessment report and interactive applications on our website: bostonmpo.org/lrtp.
    [Show full text]