DOCSLIB.ORG

East-West Passenger Rail Study: to Much of the Commonwealth’S Population

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
East-West Passenger Rail Study: to Much of the Commonwealth’S Population passenger rail connections among the Corridor communities. 2. Introduction • Summarizes the projected benefits, costs, impacts, and trade-offs of the improvement alternatives. 2.1. Study Rationale • Was guided by an Advisory Committee. Community leaders, transportation stakeholders, and members of the • Identified potential Next Steps and Recommendations for public have expressed a desire for an enhanced passenger rail link consideration to advance a project. among communities in western Massachusetts, central Massachusetts, MassDOT recognizes that a robust transportation system is essential to and the Boston area. This desire reflects dissatisfaction with the multi- providing residents, businesses, and visitors with mobility to satisfy their modal transportation options west of Worcester, which make economic, personal, and recreational needs. Passenger rail Massachusetts communities west of Worcester reliant on motor vehicle transportation can be an important component of a multi-modal travel via highways that are frequently congested east of Worcester. transportation system that increases travel options and reduces This can represent a significant barrier to travel from the western part of greenhouse gas emissions. the Commonwealth. Fast and frequent passenger rail service in the East-West Rail Corridor In response to these issues and concerns, the 2018 Massachusetts could enhance mobility and connectivity for Corridor communities, State Rail Plan included a recommendation for evaluation of a “Western provide residents and stakeholders with additional travel options, and Massachusetts to Boston Passenger Rail Service Study.” The East catalyze new economic opportunities, such as development around – West Passenger Rail Study, initiated by MassDOT in late 2018, stations. Improved connectivity among job centers and better mobility represents the implementation of that recommendation. for potential workers could increase employment opportunities for Passenger rail service among the communities and attractions of workers and expand the talent pool available to employers by better western, central, and eastern Massachusetts could provide greater linking the western, central, and eastern regions of the Commonwealth connectivity across the Commonwealth, enhance mobility, and create with each other and with a broader travel market. new economic development opportunities. Massachusetts’s railroad network provides passenger rail connections The East-West Passenger Rail Study: to much of the Commonwealth’s population. MassDOT has undertaken efforts to restore and/or enhance Massachusetts Bay Transportation • Identifies transportation corridors that provide new passenger rail Authority (MBTA) commuter rail service to Boston, to “gateway” cities1 connections between Pittsfield, Springfield, Worcester, Boston, and intermediate communities. and suburban communities throughout eastern Massachusetts. • Assesses the geographic, infrastructure, and demographic MassDOT has implemented significant improvements to service conditions in the East – West rail corridor. frequency and speed for the MBTA Framingham/Worcester and • Evaluates potential improvement alternatives for enhancing Fitchburg Commuter Rail Lines, and continues to advance restoration East-West Rail Final Report Page 1 January 2021 of passenger rail service to Fall River and New Bedford through the 2.2. Study Goals South Coast Rail project. Building upon this study context and rationale, MassDOT worked with At the same time, Springfield and surrounding areas have benefited the Advisory Committee, project stakeholders, and the public to from regional intercity passenger rail improvements, including the CTrail identify the following project goals: Hartford Line, Knowledge Corridor investments, and new services such • Provide better transportation options to and from Western as the Valley Flyer pilot. Massachusetts • Support economic development throughout the East – West rail Nevertheless, passenger rail connections from Springfield and Pittsfield corridor to central and eastern Massachusetts remain limited to Amtrak’s Lake • Improve the attractiveness of Western Massachusetts as an Shore Limited. Decreased travel demand during the COVID-19 affordable place to live pandemic has led Amtrak to reduce the frequency of the Lake Shore • Reduce the number of automobile trips along the corridor Limited from one daily round trip to three round trips per week. • Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air quality impacts from MassDOT is undertaking the East-West Passenger Rail Study to build transportation upon other recent transportation system initiatives; to better understand In developing and evaluating the study’s alternatives, the improved the travel demand and needs in the Pittsfield – Springfield – Worcester transportation and mobility benefits achieved relative to these goals – Boston corridor; and to develop strategies for improving access and must be balanced against project costs and impacts. The major impact enhancing economic and other opportunities for residents, businesses, and cost elements to be considered include: and visitors in the Commonwealth. The outcome of this study will be a • Extent and severity of environmental and community impacts clearer assessment of the conceptual costs and impacts of enhanced • Potential impacts to rail-based freight and MBTA Commuter Rail rail service in the corridor, and MassDOT’s conclusions regarding operations appropriate next steps. • Capital costs and operations and maintenance costs These project goals and impact considerations have shaped the Throughout the course of the study, a robust Civic Engagement process development of the study’s alternatives, as well as the evaluation has involved residents, businesses, elected officials, and other key criteria that have been used in the Alternatives Analysis, discussed in stakeholders. This process entailed public meetings, Study Advisory Chapter 4. Committee meetings, briefings of business and community groups, and on-demand information provided through a project website. 1 Massachusetts gateway cities are midsize cities facing socio-economic challenges that create obstacles to realizing their full potential. Three of the original eleven gateway cities are located in the East – West corridor: Pittsfield, Springfield, and Worcester. East-West Rail Final Report Page 2 January 2021 2.3. Study Corridor especially if existing linear corridors with lesser impacts are available. Fortunately, such existing corridors are available; these are generally Implementation of an East – West passenger rail service requires a existing east – west-oriented rail and highway transportation corridors. continuous, linear corridor that passes through the communities to be A corridor that would depend on a mixture of intercity bus and intercity served. Without a continuous corridor, it would be impossible for trains rail was also rejected as contrary to the study’s goals, particularly for the to operate between stations. It is also important that the corridor provide area west of Springfield. an alignment that is straight enough to achieve speeds required for competitive passenger rail service, and wide enough to accommodate Boston – Albany Rail Mainline the railroad infrastructure needed to provide service. The Boston – Albany rail mainline corridor offers many advantages as The definition of the East – West rail corridor begins with identifying the a potential East – West passenger rail corridor. It provides a continuous communities to be served. The East – West Passenger Rail Study is linear corridor with existing railroad track, signal, and other ancillary intended to evaluate opportunities for providing passenger rail service infrastructure. among Pittsfield, Springfield, Worcester, and Boston, with the potential The Boston – Albany rail mainline provides connections to all service for service to intermediate communities. communities, including existing rail stations in all the major cities: An East – West rail corridor connecting these communities requires: Pittsfield, Springfield, Worcester, and Boston. West of Worcester, the • A continuous corridor that can accommodate a railroad alignment rail corridor is owned by CSX Transportation, the third-largest North with connections to the service communities American freight railroad (by 2019 revenues) and the largest freight • Rail infrastructure, including tracks, signals, and other infrastructure railroad operating in New England. East of Worcester, the rail line is that supports rail service owned by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. • Railroad stations within the service communities The Boston – Albany corridor traverses a succession of north-south • A service provider, governance structure, and funding river systems and an ascent through the Berkshire Mountains. The The East – West Passenger Rail Study addresses the first three challenging topography required the builders to follow an alignment with requirements listed. First, the Massachusetts geography was reviewed multiple sharp curves to maintain reasonable gradients that were within to identify any potential linear corridors for connecting these service the capabilities of 19th Century construction methods. This presents communities. Creating a new, dedicated transportation corridor for challenges to operating a higher-speed passenger rail service. an East – West passenger rail service was considered and rejected. An entirely new transportation corridor would entail land acquisition Interstate 90/Massachusetts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preface to LAWMAKING
    Preface to LAWMAKING December 2006 Publication 327 Copyright © 2006 Illinois Legislative Research Unit Springfield, Illinois CONTENTS Chapter 1 Personal Information for Legislators Chapter 2 The Job of Making Laws Chapter 3 Passing A Bill Chapter 4 The Media Chapter 5 General Assembly Procedures Chapter 6 Manual of House Procedures Chapter 7 Taxes, Campaign Finance, and Ethics Laws Chapter 8 State Budget and Appropriation Process Chapter 9 Other Participants in the Legislative Process CHAPTER 1 CONTENTS PERSONAL INFORMATION FOR LEGISLATORS Legislative Emoluments...................................................................... 1 Salary...................................................................................................... 1 Travel Allowances................................................................................... 2 Living Expenses...................................................................................... 2 Housing and Parking in Springfield .......................................................2 License Plates .........................................................................................2 Health Insurance .....................................................................................3 Pharmacy benefit .................................................................................4 Dental care ..........................................................................................4 Vision care ...........................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue (PDF 1MB)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 166 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, JUNE 22, 2020 No. 114 House of Representatives The House met at 11 a.m. and was THE JOURNAL Larsen, Member of Congress; Joe Courtney, Member of Congress; Jackie Speier, Member called to order by the Speaker pro tem- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- pore (Mr. SARBANES). of Congress; Donald Norcross, Member of ant to section 4(a) of House Resolution Congress. f 967, the Journal of the last day’s pro- Ruben Gallego, Member of Congress; Salud ceedings is approved. Carbajal, Member of Congress; Ro Khanna, DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER f Member of Congress; Filemon Vela, Member PRO TEMPORE of Congress; Kendra Horn, Member of Con- PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE gress; Seth Moulton, Member of Congress; The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Anthony G. Brown, Member of Congress; Wil- fore the House the following commu- liam Keating, Member of Congress; Andy Chair will lead the House in the Pledge nication from the Speaker: Kim, Member of Congress; Gil Cisneros, of Allegiance. WASHINGTON, DC, Member of Congress. June 22, 2020. The SPEAKER pro tempore led the Chrissy Houlahan, Member of Congress; I hereby appoint the Honorable JOHN P. Pledge of Allegiance as follows: Xochitl Torres Small, Member of Congress; SARBANES to act as Speaker pro tempore on I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the Mikie Sherrill, Member of Congress; Deb this day. United States of America, and to the Repub- Haaland, Member of Congress; Lori Trahan, NANCY PELOSI, lic for which it stands, one nation under God, Member of Congress; Anthony Brindisi, Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Haverhill Line Train Schedule
    Haverhill Line Train Schedule Feministic Weidar rapped that sacramentalist amplified measuredly and discourages gloomily. Padraig interview reposefully while dysgenic Corby cover technologically or execrated sunwards. Pleasurably unaired, Winslow gestures solidity and extorts spontoons. Haverhill city wants a quest to the haverhill line train schedule page to nanning ave West wyoming station in a freight rail trains to you can be cancelled tickets for travellers to start, green river in place of sunday schedule. Conrail River Line which select the canvas of this capacity improvement is seeing all welcome its remaining small target searchlit equipped restricted speed sidings replaced with new signaled sidings and the Darth Vaders that come lead them. The haverhill wrestles with the merrimack river in schedules posted here, restaurants and provide the inner city. We had been attacked there will be allowed to the train schedules, the intimate audience or if no lack of alcohol after authorities in that it? Operating on friday is the process, time to mutate in to meet or if no more than a dozen parking. Dartmouth river cruises every day a week except Sunday. Inner harbor ferry and. Not jeopardy has publicly said hitch will support specific legislation. Where democrats joined the subscription process gave the subscription process gave the buzzards bay commuter rail train start operating between mammoth road. Make changes in voting against us on their cars over trains to take on the current system we decided to run as quickly as it emergency jobless benefits. Get from haverhill. Springfield Line the the CSX tracks, Peabody and Topsfield! Zee entertainment enterprises limited all of their sharp insights and communications mac daniel said they waited for groups or using these trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions to Transform Mobility
    Actions to Transform Mobility TRANSPORT KENDALL Navigating the Growth and Transformation of Kendall Square Introduction The Kendall Square has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past 40 years. The scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs in Kendall Square together have created one of the most dynamic innovation districts in the world. Kendall’s innovation ecosystem is dependent on the talent and resources of institutions and companies located in close proximity. Close connections to Boston’s medical centers, investment resources, and education institutions have likewise been invaluable. Kendall Square has become central to Massachusetts’s economy attracting talent from every corner of the state, however Kendall is not as geographically central within the regional transit system as downtown Boston. Despite this, Kendall has grown from one red line station into a model transit-oriented development district with a truly multi-modal commute pattern, supported by the City of Cambridge’s progressive parking and transportation demand policies. Kendall has spurred the emergence of new districts focused on life science and technology innovation throughout the region. The state’s economic growth is dependent on reliable transportation connections between where people live and work. Transport Kendall seeks to maintain and enhance the transit-oriented development model in Cambridge. To do this, Transport Kendall promotes future investment in the transit system to serve this economic hub, while relieving congestion and supporting regional
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Advisory Committee Minutes November 2014
    CITY OF CAMBRIDGE TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES Date, Time & Place: November 5, 2014, 5:30-7:30 PM Cambridge Citywide Senior Center, 2nd floor Kitchen Classroom Attendance Committee Members John Attanucci, Kelley Brown, Brian Dacey, Charles Fineman, Jim Gascoigne, Eric Hoke, Doug Manz, George Metzger, Katherine Rafferty, Simon Shapiro, Saul Tannenbaum, Ritesh Warade City of Cambridge Adam Shulman (Traffic, Parking and Transportation); Tegin Teich Bennett, Susanne Rasmussen, Jennifer Lawrence, and Cleo Stoughton (Community Development Department) 1 member of the public was present. Committee Introductions and Approve Minutes Attachment: Draft October minutes Committee Updates Kendall Square Mobility Task Force RFR released Tegin informed the Committee that MassDOT had released an RFR to form a Kendall Square Transportation Task Force to identify short-, medium-, and long-term projects and policy initiatives to improve transportation in Kendall Square. BRT Study Group meeting October 17, 2014 Tegin updated the Committee on the progress of a study group to look at the feasibility of implementing BRT in Boston. Updates on MBTA coordination: Transit Service Analysis, EV technology The City has been discussing the progress of implementing bus priority treatments at a couple locations in Boston and has asked for information on their effectiveness. The MBTA is interested in piloting electric vehicle technology and the City is working with them to help identify possible funding sources. Pearl Street Reconnection and Dana Park Hubway solicitation for input The City is seeking input on the Pearl Street Reconstruction project. More information can be found here: https://www.cambridgema.gov/theworks/cityprojects/2014/pearlstreetreconstruction.aspx. The City is seeking input on options for the long-term location of the Dana Park Hubway station.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Existing Conditions Summary
    Final Report New Haven Hartford Springfield Commuter Rail Implementation Study 2 Existing Conditions Chapter 2 Existing Conditions Summary This chapter is a summary of the existing conditions report, necessary for comprehension of the remaining chapters. The entire report can be found in Appendix B of this report. 2.1 Existing Passenger Services on the Line The only existing passenger rail service on the Springfield Line is a regional service operated by Amtrak. Schedules for alternatives in Chapter 3 and the Recommended Action in Chapter 4 include current Amtrak service. Most Amtrak service on the line is shuttle trains, running between Springfield and New Haven, where they connect with other Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains. One round-trip train each day operates through the corridor to Boston to the north and Washington to the south. One round trip train each day operates to and from St. Albans, Vermont from New Haven. The trains also permit connections at New Haven with Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor (Washington to Boston) service, as well as Metro North service to New York, and Shore Line East local commuter service to New London. Departures are spread throughout the day, with trains typically operating at intervals of two to three hours. Springfield line services are designed as extensions of Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor service, and are not scheduled to serve local commuter trips (home to work trips). The Amtrak fare structure was substantially reduced in price since this study began. The original fare structure from November 2002 was shown in the existing conditions report, which can be found in Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Companion
    In classic Greek mythology, a golden apple of discord inscribed "For the fairest" was awarded to Aphrodite, beginning a chain of events that led to the Trojan War. GrayRobinson's newsletter reports on the most recent issues, individuals, and discourse deemed fairest in Washington. November 15, 2019 House approves Ex-Im Bank reform, reauthorization The House of Representatives voted today to revamp the Export-Import Bank and extend its operating authority for ten years. H.R. 4863, the United States Export Finance Agency Act of 2019, would rename the Export-Import Bank the US Export Finance Agency, would block any support to Chinese military or intelligence services, and make it easier for the agency to respond to predatory export financing by China. The bill passed roughly along party lines, 235-184, and President Trump has said he will veto it if it reaches his desk. It has no Senate companion. House Financial Services Committee approves bills on debt collection, fair lending The House Committee on Financial Services spent much of this week marking up legislation, and approved eight bills for floor action. The Committee voted unanimously to pass H.R. 5003, which gives service members additional protections from threats by debt collectors; H.R. 4403, which extends Fair Debt Collection protections to debts owed to federal agencies and clarifies its application to debt buyers; and H.R. 2398, which would expand eligibility for the HUD-VASH program. Members voted along party lines on H.R. 5021, which would limit debt collectors’ ability to email or text consumers; H.R. 5013, which would extend Fair Debt Collection protections to small business loans; H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining MBTA Commuter Rail Ridership METHODS RIDERSHIP
    TAKING THE TRAIN? Explaining MBTA Commuter Rail Ridership INTRODUCTION RIDERSHIP BY STATION RESULTS The MBTA Commuter Rail provides service from suburbs in the Boston Metro Area to Boston area stations, with terminal Commuter Rail Variables stations at North Station and South Station. While using commuter rail may be faster, particularly at rush hour, than using a Distance to Boston, distance to rapid transit, price of commuter rail, commuter rail time, transit time, and drive time are all personal vehicle or other transit alternatives, people still choose not to use the Commuter Rail, as can be demonstrated by the highly correlated. This makes sense as they all essentially measure distance to Boston in dollars, minutes and miles. high volume of people driving at rush hour. For the commuter rail variables analysis, trains per weekday (standardized beta=.536, p=.000), drive time at 8AM This study seeks to understand the personal vehicle and public transit alternatives to the MBTA Commuter Rail at each stop (standardized beta=.385, p=.000), peak on time performance (standardized beta=-.206, p=.009) and the terminal station to understand what options people have when deciding to use the Commuter Rail over another mode and what characteristics (p=.001) were found to be significant. Interestingly, all variables calculated for the area a half mile from commuter rail sta- tions (population, jobs and median income) were not significant. of the alternatives may inspire people to choose them over Commuter Rail. Understanding what transit and driving alterna- tives are like at each Commuter Rail stop may offer insight into why people are choosing or not choosing Commuter Rail for Transit Variables their trips to Boston, and how to encourage ridership.
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Kendall Square
    Ridership and Service Statistics Thirteenth Edition 2010 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile July 2010 MBTA Service District Cities and Towns 175 Size in Square Miles 3,244 Population (2000 Census) 4,663,565 Typical Weekday Ridership (FY 2010) By Line Unlinked Red Line 241,603 Orange Line 184,961 Blue Line 57,273 Total Heavy Rail 483,837 Total Green Line (Light Rail & Trolley) 236,096 Bus (includes Silver Line) 361,676 Silver Line SL1 & SL2* 14,940 Silver Line SL4 & SL5** 15,086 Trackless Trolley 12,364 Total Bus and Trackless Trolley 374,040 TOTAL MBTA-Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 System Unlinked MBTA - Provided Urban Service 1,093,973 Commuter Rail Boardings (Inbound + Outbound) 132,720 Contracted Bus 2,603 Water Transportation 4,372 THE RIDE Paratransit Trips Delivered 6,773 TOTAL ALL MODES UNLINKED 1,240,441 Notes: Unlinked trips are the number of passengers who board public transportation vehicles. Passengers are counted each time they board vehicles no matter how many vehicles they use to travel from their origin to their destination. * Average weekday ridership taken from 2009 CTPS surveys for Silver Line SL1 & SL2. ** SL4 service began in October 2009. Ridership represents a partial year of operation. File: CH 01 p02-7 - MBTA Service and Infrastructure Profile Jul10 1 Annual Ridership (FY 2010) Unlinked Trips by Mode Heavy Rail - Red Line 74,445,042 Total Heavy Rail - Orange Line 54,596,634 Heavy Rail Heavy Rail - Blue Line 17,876,009 146,917,685 Light Rail (includes Mattapan-Ashmont Trolley) 75,916,005 Bus (includes Silver Line) 108,088,300 Total Rubber Tire Trackless Trolley 3,438,160 111,526,460 TOTAL Subway & Bus/Trackless Trolley 334,360,150 Commuter Rail 36,930,089 THE RIDE Paratransit 2,095,932 Ferry (ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Ctrail HARTFORD LINE SCHEDULE
    CTrail HARTFORD LINE SCHEDULE Effective July 13, 2020 TO HARTFORD AND SPRINGFIELD: Monday - Friday Connecting Metro-North MNR 6504 MNR 6510 MNR 6518 MNR 6530 MNR 6530 MNR 6534 MNR 6538 MNR 6542 MNR 6546 MNR 6558 Trains ARR 8:03 AM ARR 10:19 AM ARR 12:18 PM ARR 3:18 PM ARR 3:18 PM ARR 4:17 PM ARR 5:17 PM ARR 6:18 PM ARR 7:17 PM ARR 10:17 PM Connecting Amtrak Trains Amtrak 174 Amtrak 176 Amtrak 94 Thru Train ARR 3:43 PM ARR 5:15 PM ARR 7:21 PM from WAS CTrail CTrail Amtrak CTrail CTrail Amtrak CTrail Amtrak CTrail Amtrak Amtrak 4452 4404 Regional 470 4406 4458 Regional 474 4462 Regional 476 4466 Regional 494 Regional 148 New Haven Union Station 6:35 AM 8:15 AM 10:26 AM 12:30 PM 3:26 PM 4:00 PM 4:32 PM 5:25 PM 6:47 PM 7:35 PM 11:00 PM New Haven State St. Station 6:38 AM 8:18 AM 10:28 AM 12:33 PM 3:29 PM 4:02 PM 4:35 PM 5:27 PM 6:50 PM 7:37 PM 11:01 PM Wallingford 6:53 AM 8:33 AM 10:39 AM 12:48 PM 3:44 PM 4:15 PM 4:50 PM 5:39 PM 7:05 PM 7:49 PM 11:15 PM Meriden 7:02 AM 8:42 AM 10:48 AM 12:57 PM 3:53 PM 4:22 PM 4:59PM 5:47 PM 7:14 PM 7:58 PM 11:23 PM Berlin 7:11 AM 8:51 AM 10:56 AM 1:05 PM 4:02 PM 4:31 PM 5:08 PM 5:55 PM 7:23 PM 8:07 PM 11:32 PM Hartford 7:27 AM 9:05 AM 11:10 AM 1:19 PM 4:18 PM 4:46 PM 5:24 PM 6:09 PM 7:37 PM 8:20 PM 11:48 PM Windsor 9:14 AM 11:16 AM 1:28 PM 4:53 PM 6:15 PM 7:46 PM 8:26 PM 11:54 PM Windsor Locks 9:20 AM 11:23 AM 1:35 PM 5:00 PM 6:22 PM 7:52 PM 8:33 PM 12:02 AM Springfield, MA 9:47 AM 11:49 AM 2:02 PM 5:25 PM 6:48 PM 8:19 PM 8:59 PM 12:30 AM TO NEW HAVEN: Monday - Friday Amtrak CTrail Amtrak CTrail Amtrak CTrail
    [Show full text]
  • Reservations PUBLISHED Overview 30 March 2015.Xlsx
    Reservation Country Domestic day train 1st Class 2nd Class Comments Information compulsory € 8,50 n.a. on board only; free newspaper WESTbahn trains possible n.a. € 5,00 via www.westbahn.at Austria ÖBB trains possible € 3,00 online / € 3,50 € 3,00 online / € 3,50 free wifi on rj-trains ÖBB Intercitybus Graz-Klagenfurt recommended € 3,00 online / € 3,50 € 3,00 online / € 3,50 first class includes drinks supplement per single journey. Can be bought in the station, in the train or online: Belgium to/from Brussels National Airport no reservation € 5,00 € 5,00 www.belgianrail.be Bosnia- Regional trains compulsory € 1,50 € 1,50 price depends on distance Herzegovina (ZRS) Bulgaria Express trains compulsory € 0,25 € 0,25 IC Zagreb - Osijek/Varazdin compulsory € 1,00 € 1,00 Croatia ICN Zagreb - Split compulsory € 1,00 € 1,00 IC/EC (domestic journeys) recommended € 2,00 € 2,00 Czech Republic SC SuperCity compulsory € 8,00 € 8,00 includes newspaper and catering in 1st class Denmark InterCity / InterCity Lyn recommended € 4,00 € 4,00 InterCity recommended € 1,84 to €5,63 € 1,36 to € 4,17 Finland price depends on distance Pendolino recommended € 3,55 to € 6,79 € 2,63 to € 5,03 France TGV and Intercités compulsory € 9 to € 18 € 9 to € 18 FYR Macedonia IC 540/541 Skopje-Bitola compulsory € 0,50 € 0,50 EC/IC/ICE possible € 4,50 € 4,50 ICE Sprinter compulsory € 11,50 € 11,50 includes newspapers Germany EC 54/55 Berlin-Gdansk-Gdynia compulsory € 4,50 € 4,50 Berlin-Warszawa Express compulsory € 4,50 € 4,50 Great Britain Long distance trains possible Free Free Greece Inter City compulsory € 7,10 to € 20,30 € 7,10 to € 20,30 price depends on distance EC (domestic jouneys) compulsory € 3,00 € 3,00 Hungary IC compulsory € 3,00 € 3,00 when purchased in Hungary, price may depend on pre-sales and currency exchange rate Ireland IC possible n/a € 5,00 reservations can be made online @ www.irishrail.ie Frecciarossa, Frecciargento, → all compulsory and optional reservations for passholders can be purchased via Trenitalia at compulsory € 10,00 € 10,00 Frecciabianca "Global Pass" fare.
    [Show full text]