DOCSLIB.ORG

Coal Resources of the Upper Part of the Monongahela Formation and the Dunkard Group in Ohio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coal Resources of the Upper Part of the Monongahela Formation and the Dunkard Group in Ohio ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·~·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·~ I• I I • • I STATE CE OHIO I MICHAl'l. V. DI SALLE, Cover..,. • DEPARTMENT CE NATIIRAL RESOURCES I HERBERT B. EAGON, Director DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY • RALPH J. BERNHAGEN, Chief I • I• I • REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 38 I. I • I COAL RESOURCES OF THE UPPER PART OF THE MONONGAHELA FORMATION AND THE DUNKARD GROUP IN OHIO BY I George H. Denton COLUMBUS 1960 ~--·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·- STATE OF OHIO Michael V. DiSalle Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Herbert B. Eagon Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION C, D. Blubaugh Joseph E. Hurst Herbert B. Eagon L. L. Rummell Byron Frederick Demas L. Sears Forrest G. Hall Myron T. Sturgeon William Hoyne DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen Chief ·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-~-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·~ I • I • STATE OF OHIO MICHAEL V. DI SALLE, Governor I DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • HERBERT II. EAGON, Director I DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY • RALPH J. BERNHAGEN, Chief I 1 REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 38 0 HJ 0 c- -, · - ,-- - - ~ ~~ - • ~ ..r ~ .. 1- L ...... __ ,, ~- /' {/., '1 ~ z COAL RESOURCES OF THE UPPER PART OF THE MONONGAHELA FORMATION AND THE DUNKARD GROUP IN OHIO BY George H. Denton COLUMBUS 1960 ~--·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·~·-·-·-·-·-·-· - PREFACE This report is the eighth of a series by the Division of Geological Survey dealing with coal resources of Ohio. A bulletin summarizing all eight reports is soon to be published. The purpose of this investigation is to summarize the known information concerning the coal reserve of the upper Monongahela formation and Dunkard group in Ohio. The geologic data upon which this report is based have been accumulated in open file or in pub - lished reports of the Division of Geological Survey over a period of more than 70 years. Al- though the recognition and correlation of many of the minor coal beds, especially those of the Dunkard group, is still a controversial geologic problem, no attempt is made to resolve the problem in this report. This report is intended specifically for use by the coal producer, miner, prospector, and owner of coal-bearing land. Previous reports of the Division of Geological Survey in the series concerned with the estimated original reserve of Ohio coal are listed below: Brant, R. A., 1954, The Lower Kittanning No. 5 coal bed in Ohio: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 21. Brant, R. A., 1956, Coal resources of the upper part of the Allegheny formation in Ohio: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 29. DeBrosse, T. A., 1957, Coal beds of the Conemaugh formation in Ohio: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 34. DeLong, R. M., 1955, The Pittsburgh No. 8 and Redstone No. Ba coal beds in Ohio: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 26. De Long, R. M., 1957, Coal resources of the lower part of the Allegheny formation in Ohio: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 31. Granchi, J. A., 1958, Coal resources of the Pottsville formation: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 36. Smith, W. H., and others, 1952, The Meigs Creek No. 9 coal bed in Ohio, part I, Geology and reserves: Ohio Division of Geological Survey Report of Investigations 17. ii - . CONTENTS Preface--------------------------------------------------------------------- ii Abstract-------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 CHAPTER 1 - GEOLOGIC DESCRIPTION OF THE UPPER MONONGAHELA FOR- MATION AND THE DUNKARD GROUP-------------------------- 2 CHAPTER 2 - PRINCIPAL COAL BEDS---------------------------------------- 5 Fishpot coal---------------------------------------------------------- 5 Uniontown (No. 10) coal-- - ------ --------- --- --- ------ --- --- ----- ------- 5 Waynesburg (No. 11) coal- --- --------- ----- ---- ------- ---- ---- --------- 9 Waynesburg "A" (No. lla) coal------ ------ ----- ----- --- -- -- ------------ 9 Washington (No. 12) coal---- ---------- ---- --- --- ----- ----- -------- ----- 12 CHAPTER 3 - AREAL DESCRIPTION------------------------------------------ 15 Gallia County--------------------------------------------------------- 15 Meigs County--------------------------------------------------------- 15 Athens County-------------------------------------------------------- 16 Washington County---------------------------------------------------- 18 Morgan County-------------------------------------------------------- 21 Noble County--------------------------------------------------------- 21 Monroe County-------------------------------------------------------- 23 Belmont County------------------------------------------------------- 29 Harrison County------------------------------------------------------- 31 Jefferson County------------------------------------------------------ 33 CHAPTER 4 - SUMMARY OF THE COAL RESERVE----------------------------- 35 Method used to estimate the reserve------------------------------------ 39 Limitations of the investigation------ ---- ---- ----- ------------ -- -- ------ 41 CHAPTER 5 - MINING HISTORY·--------------------------------------------- 42 CHAPTER 6 - CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COAL-------------------- 45 Selected Bibliography-------------------------------------------------------- 49 TABLES 1. Original reserve of Uniontown (No. 10) coal in Washington County------------- 20 2. Original reserve of Washington (No. 12) coal in Washington County----------- 20 3. Original reserve of Waynesburg "A" (No. lla) coal in Morgan County--------- 21 4. Original reserve of Fishpot coal in Noble County---------------------------- 22 5. Original reserve of Uniontown (No. 10) coal in Noble County------------------ 22 6. Original reserve of Waynesburg (No. 11) coal in Noble County---------------- 23 7. Original reserve of Fishpot coal in Monroe County--------------------------- 23 8. Original reserve of Uniontown (No. 10) coal in Monroe County----------------- 24 9. Original reserve of Waynesburg (No. 11) coal in Monroe County-------------- 24 10. Original reserve of Waynesburg "A" (No. lla) coal in Monroe County--------- 27 11. Original reserve of Washington (No. 12) coal in Monroe County--------------- 27 12. Original reserve of Uniontown (No. 10) coal in Harrison County--------------- 31 13. Original reserve of Waynesburg (No. 11) coal in Jefferson County------------- 33 iii 14. Summary of original reserve of upper Monongahela-Dunkard coal beds in Ohio- 36 15. Distribution of abandoned coal mines in upper Monongahela-Dunkard strata in Ohio------------------------------------------------------------------- 43 16. Selected chemical analyses of coal from upper Monongahela-Dunkard strata in Ohio-------------------------------------------------------------------- 46 FIGURES 1. Generalized distribution of rocks of upper Pennsylvanian-Permian age in Ohio-- 3 2. Generalized geologic rock column of upper Monongahela and Dunkard strata in Ohio------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 3. Average intervals between coal beds of upper Monongahela and Permian strata in Ohio---------------------------------------------------------------- 7 4. Areal extent of Fishpot coal more than 14 inches thick in Ohio---------------- 8 5. Areal extent of Uniontown (No. 10) coal more than 14 inches thick in Ohio------ 10 6. Areal extent of minable Waynesburg (No. 11) coal in Ohio, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania----------------------------------------------------------- 11 7. Areal extent of Waynesburg "A" (No. lla) coal more than 14 inches thick in Ohio 13 8. Areal extent of Washington (No. 12) coal more than 14 inches thick in Ohio----- 14 9. Graphic sections of minable Uniontown (No. 10) coal in Washington County----- 19 10. Graphic sections of minable Uniontown (No. 10) coal in Monroe County--------- 25 11. Graphic sections of minable Waynesburg "A" (No. lla) coal in Monroe County-- 26 12. Graphic sections of minable Washington (No. 12) coal in Monroe County-------- 28 13. Graphic sections of Waynesburg (No. 11) coal in northern Belmont County------ 30 14. Graphic sections of Waynesburg (No. 11) coal in Harrison County-------------- 32 15. Illustration of the dot-count method used in estimating area of coal reserve---- 40 iv I ABSTRACT An estimated 3, 902, 396, 000 short tons of original coal reserve of the upper Monon- gahela and Dunkard strata is distributed principally in Belmont, Monroe, and Washington Counties. The Monongahela coal beds contain an estimated original reserve of 2, 511, 668, 000 short tons, distributed as follows: Fishpot coal------------------ 440, 746, 000 tons Uniontown (No. 10) coal-------1, 380, 168, 000 tons Waynesburg (No. 11) coal ----- 690, 754, 000 tons The Dunkard coal beds contain an estimated 1, 390, 728, 000 short tons, which is distributed as follows: Waynesburg "A" (No. lla) coal-- 490, 686, 000 tons Washington (No. 12) coal------- 900, 042, 000 tons Most chemical analyses of these coal beds reveal a high ash and sulfur content and a correspondingly low Btu content. Most of these coal beds are easily accessible and have been mined on a small scale for local use. Because of the general thinness and low heating value of the coal, increased utilization of these beds will probably await the development of highly efficient preparation plants or coal-burning equipment that can utilize low-grade coal. As the better quality and thicker coal beds are depleted, the upper Monongahela-Dunkard coals will play an increasingly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Development and Problems Within the Pennsylvanian Nomenclature of Ohio.1
    Historical Development and Problems Within the Pennsylvanian Nomenclature of Ohio.1 GLENN E. LARSEN, OHIO Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Fountain Sq., Bldg. B, Columbus, OH 43224 ABSTRACT. An analysis of the historical development of the Pennsylvanian stratigraphic nomenclature, as used in Ohio, has helped define and clarify problems inherent in Ohio's stratigraphic nomenclature. Resolution of such problems facilitates further development of a useful stratigraphy and philosophy for mapping. Investigations of Pennsylvanian-age rocks in Ohio began as early as 1819- From 1858 to 1893, investigations by Newberry, I. C. White, and Orton established the stratigraphic framework upon which the present-day nomenclature is based. During the 1950s, the cyclothem concept was used to classify and correlate Pennsylvanian lithologic units. This classification led to a proliferation of stratigraphic terms, as almost every lithologic type was named and designated as a member of a cyclothem. By the early 1960s, cyclothems were considered invalid as a lithostratigraphic classification. Currently, Pennsylvanian nomenclature of Ohio, as used by the Ohio Division of Geological Survey, consists of four groups containing 123 named beds, with no formal formations or members. In accordance with the 1983 North American Stratigraphic code, the Ohio Division of Geological Survey considers all nomenclature below group rank as informal. OHIO J. SCI. 91 (1): 69-76, 1991 INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION Understanding the historical development of Pennsyl- The Early 1800s vanian stratigraphy in Ohio is important to the Ohio The earliest known references to Pennsylvanian-age Division of Geological Survey (OGS). Such an under- rocks in Ohio are found in Atwater's (1819) report on standing of Pennsylvanian stratigraphy helps define Belmont County, and an article by Granger (1821) on plant stratigraphic nomenclatural problems in order to make fossils collected near Zanesville, Muskingum County.
    [Show full text]
  • Summerfield and Woodsfield Quadrangles, Ohio
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ALBERT B. FALL, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 720 ECONOMIC GEOLOGY OF THE SUMMERFIELD AND WOODSFIELD QUADRANGLES, OHIO WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF COAL AND OTHER MINERAL RESOURCES EXCEPT OIL AND GAS BY D. DALE CONDIT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 30 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Bibliography............................................................. 6 Introduction. ^........................................................... 7 i Abstract of report.............................................:....... 7 Field and office work................................................. 7 Acknowledgments.................................................... 8 Geography .................../...................................... ..... 8 Location............................................................ 8 Topographic features................................................... 9 Drainage........................................................ 9 Relief and land forms...............:........... '. ................. 10 Agricultural and commercial conditions................................ 11 Transportation facilities........................................... 11 Railroads.................................................... 11 New railroad routes........................................... 11 Highways...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Best Management Practices for Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Maryland
    Recommended Best Management Practices for Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Maryland Keith N. Eshleman & Andrew Elmore (PIs) Appalachian Laboratory University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science Frostburg, MD 21532 Final Report submitted to: Maryland Department of the Environment Baltimore, MD February 18, 2013 Acknowledgments We solicited and received the help of quite a few people during the completion of this project. While the project investigators (KNE and AJE) are responsible for the content of the final report, we especially acknowledge three individuals who helped us with the organization, content, and writing of several chapters: Russell R. Dickerson (Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland; Chapter 2) Jeanne M. VanBriesen (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University; Chapter 4); and Todd R. Lookingbill (Department Geography and the Environment, University of Richmond; Chapter 5). Previous time commitments precluded them from assisting with other sections of the report, so they are listed as chapter co-authors. We thank the following individuals for providing us with data: Scott Bearer, Deborah Carpenter, Jennifer Chadwick-Moore, Kevin Coyne, Lynn Davidson, Gregory Day, Dan Feller, Dave Foreman, Mike Garner, John Grace, Jeff Halka, Kara Hawkins, Jaron Hawkins, Greg Hildreth, Zoe Johnson, Catherine McCall, Phung Pham, Gene Piotrowski, Matt Rowe, Matt Sell, Frank Siano, Matthew Stover, and Kevin Wagner. Robert Sabo compiled much of the extant literature on best practices that underpinned our analyses of best practices. Steven Guinn produced all of the maps used in this report and performed many of the geographic analyses on which our recommendations are based. Robert Hilderbrand contributed text and comments to Chapter 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Geology TABLE of CONTENTS
    GEOLOGY OF MORGAN COUNTY, OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State U n iv e r sity By DONALD LEONARD NORIXNG, B. A. The Ohio S ta te U n iv e r sity 1957 Approved by; A dviser 'Department of Geology TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION LOCATION 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .. 4 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 5 PREVIOUS WORK 7 PHYSIOGRAPHY GENERAL 9 DRAINAGE 14 RELIEF 14 STRATIGRAPHY PENNSYLVANIAN SYSTEM GEJSRAX 18 ALLEGHENY SERIES General 26 Kiddle Kittanning Clay Member 27 Kiddle Kittanning (No. 6) Coal Member 28 ¥ashingtonvilie Shale Member JO Upper K ittanning Coal Member J1 Lower Freeport Sandstone and Shale Member J2 Lower Freeport Limestone Member 55 Lower Freeport Clay Member 55 Lower Freeport (No. 6-A) Coal Member 55 Dorr Run Shale Member J6 Upper Freeport Sandstone and Shale Member J6 Bolivar Clay Member J8 Bolivar Coal Member 59 Upper Freeport Limestone Member 59 Upper Freeport Clay Member 40 Upper Freeport (No. 7) Coal Member 4l CCN3KAUGH SERIES General 45 Lower Mahoning Sandstone and Shale Member 48 Mahoning Limestone Member 51 Thornton Clay Member 52 Mahoning Coal Member 54 Upper Mahoning Sandstone and Shale Member 55 Mason Clay Member 57 ii iii Mason Coal Member 58 Brush Creek Shale and Sandstone Member 59 Brush Creek Coal Member 60 Brush Creek Limestone Member 6l Buffalo Sandstone and Shale Member 69 Wilgus Coal Member 72 Cambridge Limestone Member 75 Unnamed Shale Member 74 Bloomfield Limestone Member 75 Anderson Clay Member 75 Anderson Coal
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Perm/An Rocks
    COAL -BEARING UPPER PENNSYLVANIAN AND LOWER PERM/AN ROCKS WASHIN6TON AREA, PENNSYLVANIA Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 621 Coal-Bearing Upper Pennsylvanian and Lower Permian Rocks, Washington Area, Pennsylvania Part 1. Lithofacies Part 2. Economic and Engineering Geology By HENRY L. BERRYHILL, JR., STANLEY P. SCHWEINFURTH, and BION H. KENT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 621 Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-608654 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ................................................................................ 1 Stratigraphy Continued Introduction .......................................................................... 2 Pennsylvanian and Permian Systems Continued Purpose and scope of report .................................... 2 Dunkard Group ..... ........................ ................- 24 Previous work .............................................................. 3 Waynesburg Formation .............................. 24 Acknowledgments ........................................................ 3 Permian System ...................................... 25 Geography
    [Show full text]
  • Allegany County
    763 MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALLEGANY COUNTY MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ALLEGANY COUNTY BALTIMORE THE JOHNS HOPKINS PRESS 1900 ^6e jfrnbenmafS Company BALTIMORE, MD., U. S. A. COMMISSION JOHN WALTEE SMITH, President. GOVERNOR OF MARYLAND. JOSHUA W. HEEING, COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND. DANIEL C. OILMAN, . Executive Offickk. PRESIDENT OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY. E. W. SILVESTEE, Secretary. PRESIDENT OF THE MA-BYLAND AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE. SCIENTIFIC STAFF Wm. Bullock Clark, . ... State Geologist. SUPERINTENDENT OF THE SURVEY. Edward B. Mathews, . Assistant State Geoi.ogist. Charles S. Prosser, Chief of Division of Appalachian Geology, L. A. Bauer, . Chief of Division of Terrestrial Magnetism. C. C. O'Harra Assistant Geologist. E. B. Eowe, Assistant Geologist. Also with the cooperation of several members of the scientific bureaus of the National Government. LETTER OF TRANSM1TTAL To His Excellency John Waltee Smith, Governor of Maryland and President of the Geological Survey Commission. Sir:—I have the honor to present herewith a report on The Physi- cal Features of Allegany County. The Volume constitutes the first of a series of reports on county resources, and is accompanied by an Atlas with large scale topographical and geological maps. The infor- mation brought forward in these publications is of both economic and educational significance and I believe will prove of interest and value both to those who are residents of the county and those from a distance who may be considering sites for homes or for the investment of capital therein. I am, Very respectfully, Wm. Bullock Clark, State Geologist. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 'November, 1900. CONTENTS PAGE PREFACE 17 INTRODUCTION 33 THE PHYSIOGRAPHY OF ALLEGANY COUNTY.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of the Bellefonte Quadrangle, Pennsylvania
    PLEASE DO NOT DESTROY OR THROW AWAY THIS PUBLICATION. If you have no further use for it, write to the Geological Survey at Washington and ask for a frank to return it UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE BELLEFONTE QUADRANGLE, PENNSYLVANIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 855 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 855 GEOLOGY AND MINEEAL BESOUECES OF THE BELLEFONTE QUADRANGLE, PENNSYLVANIA BY CHARLES BUTTS AND ELWOOD S. MOORE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1936 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. -------- Price 50 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract ___ -- 1 Introduction ._________________________________________________ 4 Location and area___-__--_---_-_------________________________ 4 Appalachian Highlands___-_______----_________________________ 4 Piedmont province._______________________________________ 5 Blue Ridge province ---_--_------_-__-__..-_-_-.________ 5 Valley and Ridge province_ _--___._______________ 6 Appalachian Plateaus____________________________________ 7 Drainage of the Appalachian Highlands____-__----_-_-_-.____ 8 Topography....--...- _------__--_--_____ . _ _ .... 8 General features.._______.______________ 8 Relief____ --- ---------------- ___-____------. ._ 9 Allegheny Plateau and Allegheny Mountains-_--_-----_______ 9 Bald Eagle Mountain____________________________________ 9 Nittany Mountain._______________________________________ 9 Tussey Mountain___-_____-__--___-________.______________
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Geologic Factors Affecting Mining of the Pittsburgh Coalbed
    Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations/l975 Selected Geologic Factors Affecting Mining of the Pittsburgh Coalbed UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Report of Investigations 8093 Selected Geologic Factors Affecting Mining of the Pittsburgh Coalbed By C. M. McCulloch, W. P. Diamond, B. M. Bench, and Maurice Deul Pittsburgh Mining and Safety Research Center, Pittsburgh, Pa. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Thomas S. Kleppe, Secretary Jack W. Carlson, Assistant Secretary-Energy and Minerals BUREAU OF MINES Thomas V. Falkie, Director This publication has been cataloged as follows: McCulloch, Charles M Selected geologic factors affecting mining of the Pitts- burgh coalbed, by C. M. McCulloch [and others. Washing- ton] U.S. Bureau of Mines [1975] 72 p. illus., tables. (U.S. Bureau of Mines. Report of investi- gations 8093) Includes bibliography. 1. Coal mines and mining-Pennsylvania . 2. Coal mines and mining-West Virginia. 3. Methane. I. U.S. Bureau of Mines. 11. Title. 111. Title: Pittsburgh coalbed, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. (Series) TN23.U7 no. 8093 622.06173 U.S. Dept. of the Int. Library CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................................ 1 Introduction ............................................................ 1 Acknowledgments ......................................................... 3 Historical background ................................................... 3 Structure and stratigraphy of the Pittsburgh coalbed .................... 4 Regional structure and paleogeography .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Geologic Names of North America
    Index to the Geologic Names of North America GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1056-B Index to the Geologic Names of North America By DRUID WILSON, GRACE C. KEROHER, and BLANCHE E. HANSEN GEOLOGIC NAMES OF NORTH AMERICA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 10S6-B Geologic names arranged by age and by area containing type locality. Includes names in Greenland, the West Indies, the Pacific Island possessions of the United States, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.G. - Price 60 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Major stratigraphic and time divisions in use by the U.S. Geological Survey._ iv Introduction______________________________________ 407 Acknowledgments. _--__ _______ _________________________________ 410 Bibliography________________________________________________ 410 Symbols___________________________________ 413 Geologic time and time-stratigraphic (time-rock) units________________ 415 Time terms of nongeographic origin_______________________-______ 415 Cenozoic_________________________________________________ 415 Pleistocene (glacial)______________________________________ 415 Cenozoic (marine)_______________________________________ 418 Eastern North America_______________________________ 418 Western North America__-__-_____----------__-----____ 419 Cenozoic (continental)___________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Geology Field Trip
    Readings and Notes An Introduction to Earth Science 2016 A Geology Field Trip John J. Renton Thomas Repine Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/earthscience_readings Part of the Geology Commons A GEOLOGY FIELD TRIP by Dr. John J. Renton Dept. of Geology and Geography West Virginia University _,-....~-?IJ~'I Introduction to Field Trip I .I I had several objectives in mind when I prepared this field trip. I want to develop I in you an interest, an understanding, and an appreciation of geology of the region. I ~ ~ I want to show you differences between three of the basic physiographic provinces !3' /f,... within Appalachia, the Low Plateau, the High Plateau, and the Appalachian l'«(t/1 Mountain Section of the Valley and Ridge Province. I also want to show you the role ,}J, I ,~...., " that the kinds and structures of the underlying rocks plays in the formation of the I topography of a region in order to have you better understand why the appearance of the land changes as you travel about FIGURE 2 the country. During the trip, you will also see excellent examples of the process of weathering as well as the erosive I .I power of streams. The trip will visit .I several tourist areas and, in addition to 0. I " ~ r.::: I their scenic beauty, you will learn that ,J they represent excellent examples of g> I 'S~ I important geologic features. C , - --,J~ ~' ,, I '~, G> I ROAD LOG ~ I Cl> I ch .Ct Introduction: As you begin the trip, 0 I there are two figures you will want to s: 1 •~~ ...
    [Show full text]
  • An Additional Fossiliferous Member in the Allegheny Formation (Pennsylvanian) of Ohio1
    THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE VOL. XLIX JANUARY, 1949 No. 1 AN ADDITIONAL FOSSILIFEROUS MEMBER IN THE ALLEGHENY FORMATION (PENNSYLVANIAN) OF OHIO1 MYRON T. STURGEON AND WILLIAM M. MERRILL2 Ohio University and The Ohio State University INTRODUCTION In eastern Ohio stratigraphic members of marine and brackish water origin are present in the Pottsville, Allegheny, and Conemaugh formations or series of the Pennsylvanian system. None is known in the overlying Monongahela formation, and only one brackish member occurs in the still higher Dunkard series of Permian age. In our Pennsylvanian, the marine and brackish members characteristically overlie a coal in the normal stratigraphic succession although many coals lack such overlying members. Coal and a marine and/or brackish water unit, together with other lithologic types, occur in a definite stratigraphic succession called a cyclothem by Weller (1932, footnote, p. 1003, Correlation and Extent of Pennsyl- vanian Cyclothems by H. R. Wanless and J. M. Weller. See also Weller, 1930, 1931, for further descriptive details). Many cyclothems occur above one another in the Pennsylvanian system of eastern and central North America, and a complete cyclothem has the following sequence of beds (See also Wanless, 1939, p. 8): MARINE: 9. Shale containing clay ironstone bands and thin limestones 8. Limestone 7. Calcareous shale 6. Black shale CONTINENTAL: 5. Coal 4. Underclay 3. Limestone 2. Sandy and micaceous shale 1. Sandstone Disconformity Published by permission of the State Geologist of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio. 8We are indebted td a number of persons for aid and encouragement during the preparation of this paper. Mr. John H.
    [Show full text]