DOCSLIB.ORG

Stratigraphic and Structural Framework of the Carboniferous Rocks of the Central Appalachian Basin in Kentucky Donald R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stratigraphic and Structural Framework of the Carboniferous Rocks of the Central Appalachian Basin in Kentucky Donald R University of Kentucky UKnowledge Kentucky Geological Survey Bulletin Kentucky Geological Survey 1992 Stratigraphic and Structural Framework of the Carboniferous Rocks of the Central Appalachian Basin in Kentucky Donald R. Chesnut Jr. University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kgs_b Part of the Geology Commons Repository Citation Chesnut, Donald R. Jr., "Stratigraphic and Structural Framework of the Carboniferous Rocks of the Central Appalachian Basin in Kentucky" (1992). Kentucky Geological Survey Bulletin. 4. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kgs_b/4 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Kentucky Geological Survey at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Geological Survey Bulletin by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN 0075-5559 KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Donald C. Haney, State Geologist and Director UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, LEXINGTON Stratigraphic and Structural Framework of the Carboniferous Rocks of the Central Appalachian Basin in Kentucky Donald R. Chesnut, Jr. / ,ii / I / / I BULLETIN 3 Series XI, 1992 https://doi.org/10.13023/kgs.b03.11 ISSN 0075-5559 KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Donald C. Haney, State Geologist and Director UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, LEXINGTON STRATIGRAPHIC AND STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK OF CARBONIFEROUS ROCKS IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN BASIN IN KENTUCKY Donald R. Chesnut, Jr. Bulletin 3 Series XI, 1992 https://doi.org/10.13023/kgs.b03.11 ISSN 0075- 5559 KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Donald C. Haney, State Geologist and Director UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, LEXINGTON STRATIGRAPHIC AND STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK OF CARBONIFEROUS ROCKS IN THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN BASIN IN KENTUCKY Donald R. Chesnut, Jr. Bulletin 3 Series XI, 1992 https://doi.org/10.13023/kgs.b03.11 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY Donald R. Chesnut, Jr., Geologist V Charles T. Wethington, Jr., President Cortland F. Eble, Geologist V Linda J. Magid, Vice President for Research and David A. Williams, Geologist V, Henderson Office Graduate Studies Warren H. Anderson, Geologist IV Jack Supplee, Director, Fiscal Affairs and Sponsored Gerald A. Weisenfluh, Geologist IV Project Administration Stephen F. Greb, Geologist Ill Robert Andrews, Geologist I KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADVISORY Dean D. Sheets, Assistant Geologist BOARD Petroleum and Stratigraphy Section: Steve Cawood, Chairman, Pineville James A. Drahovzal, Head Larry R. Finley, Henderson Martin C. Noger, Geologist VII Hugh B. Gabbard, Richmond Terence Hamilton-Smith, Geologist V Kenneth Gibson, Madisonville Patrick J. Gooding, Geologist IV Wallace W. Hagan, Lexington David C. Harris, Geologist IV Phil M. Miles, Lexington Brandon C. Nuttall, Geologist IV W. A. Mossbarger, Lexington Joseph F. Meglen, Geologist II Ralph Palmer, Winchester Matthew Humphreys, Geologist I Henry A. Spalding, Hazard Mara Chen, Post-Doctoral Scholar Ralph N. Thomas, Owensboro James B. Harris, Post-Doctoral Scholar George H. Warren, Jr., Owensboro Robert R. Daniel, Laboratory Technician B David A. Zegeer, Lexington David E. McFadden, Senior Laboratory Assistant KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Robyn A. Johnson, Staff Assistant IV Donald C. Haney, State Geologist and Director Anna E. Watson, Staff Assistant IV John D. Kiefer, Assistant State Geologist for Adminis­ Frances A. Benson, Staff Assistant IV tration Luanne Davis, Staff Assistant IV James C. Cobb, Assistant State Geologist for Re­ Theola L. Evans, Staff Assistant IV search Water Resources Section: ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION James S. Dinger, Head Personnel and Finance Section: James A. Kipp, Geologist V James L. Hamilton, Administrative Staff Officer II Daniel I. Carey, Hydrologist IV Roger S. Banks, Account Clerk V James C. Currens, Geologist IV Clerical Section: David R. Wunsch, Geologist IV Jody L. Fox, Staff Assistant VI Alex W. Fogle, Hydrologist Ill Regina A. Gibson, Staff Assistant VII Philip G. Conrad, Geologist II Shirley D. Dawson, Staff Assistant V 0 . Barton Davidson, Geologist II Eugenia E. Kelley, Staff Assistant V David L. Harmon, Geologist II Juanita G. Smith, Staff Assistant V, Henderson Office Dwayne M. Keagy, Geologist II Publications Section: Shelley A. Minns, Research Assistant Donald W. Hutcheson, Head Ed Fortner, Jr., Geological Technician Margaret Luther Smath, Geologic Editor Ill C. Douglas R. Graham, Geological Technician Terry D. Hounshell, Chief Cartographic Illustrator Joyce Belcher, Staff Assistant IV Richard A. Smath, Geologist Ill, ESIC Coordinator Computer and Laboratory Services Section: Robert C. Holladay, Principal Drafting Technician Steven J. Cordiviola, Head Michael L. Murphy, Drafting Technician Richard E. Sergeant, Geologist V William A. Briscoe, Ill, Publication Sales Supervisor Joseph B. Dixon, Systems Programmer Kenneth G. Otis, Stores Worker Henry E. Francis, Associate Scientist GEOLOGICAL DIVISION Zhalet Baharestan, Senior Research Analyst Coal and Minerals Section: Xenia P. Culbertson, Research Analyst James C. Cobb, Head Steven R. Mock, Senior Laboratory Technician Garland R. Dever, Jr., Geologist VII Mark F. Thompson, Research Analyst CONTENTS Page Abstract ................. ......... ... ... ......... .. ........... .. ........ 1 Introduction .. ... ...... .. ................. ............ .... ... .. ........... .. 2 Procedures .... ... ... .. ............ .. ........................ .... .. .. 3 Descriptions of Cross Sections ..... ... .. .. .. .................. .. .. ........ 3 Lithostratigraphic Units ..... .. .... ... .. .. ........ ......... .. ........ 3 Chattanooga Shale ........... ...... .. .... ........................ ..... 4 Borden Formation ..... ..... ............................. .............. 6 Fort Payne Formation ...... .... ...................... ... ................. 6 Salem and Warsaw Formations .......................... .. ......... .... 6 Slade Formation ...... .. ....... ....... ...... .............. .. ......... ... 6 Mount Vernon Member ......... .................. ......... .. ... ... 6 Poppin Rock Member ... .......... .... .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ......... 7 Pennington Group ..................... ... ............. ......... ... .... 7 Bluefield Formation ............ .. .. .. ........................ .... 7 Hinton Formation ........... ... .................. .. .... ...... .. ..... 7 Princeton Sandstone .. .......... ........ .. ........... .................. 7 Bluestone Formation .. .. ...... ..... ................. ... ......... 7 Occurrence of Pennington Group ............. ......................... 8 Pennsylvanian Quartzose Sandstone Formations ......... .. .. .... ...... .. .... 8 Warren Point Sandstone Formation ...... .......... ........ .. .......... 9 Sewanee Sandstone Formation . 10 Bee Rock Sandstone Formation . 11 Corbin Sandstone Formation ......... ...... ... , . 13 The Breathitt Group . 14 Pocahontas Formation ............. ......... , . 15 Bottom Creek Formation . 16 Alvy Creek Formation . 17 Grundy Formation . 17 Pikeville Formation . 18 Hyden Formation . 18 Four Corners Formation . 19 Princess Formation . 19 Conemaugh and Mongahela Formations . 19 Regional Unconformity . 20 Structural Framework ... ................................................. 20 Folds . .... ......... .. ..... ..... ....... ... .............. ... .... 20 Monocline . 24 Faults . .............. .. ........... .. .. ........... ......... ............ 25 Potential for Subsurface Coal Resources . 26 CONTENTS ( Continued) Acknowledgments . 26 References Cited . 28 Appendix 1: Reference Section for the Grundy Formation . 31 Appendix 2: Reference Section for the Pikeville Formation . 33 Appendix 3: Reference Section for the Hyden Formation . 36 Appendix 4: Reference Section for the Four Corners Formation . 38 Appendix 5: Reference Section for the Lower Part of the Princess Formation . 40 Appendix 6: Reference Section for the Upper Part of the Princess Formation . 42 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1. Lithostratigraphic correlation chart of Carboniferous units in the Central Appalachian Basin . In Pocket 2. Catlettsburg and Grundy dip sections . In Pocket 3. Booneville and Lake City dip sections . In Pocket 4. Hazard strike section . In Pocket 5. Pineville strike section . In Pocket 6. Harlan strike section . In Pocket 7. Catlettsburg dip section, Grundy dip section, Booneville dip section, Lake City dip section, Hazard strike section, Pineville strike section, and Harlan strike section . In Pocket 8. Preliminary coal correlation chart of the Grundy and overlying Breathitt formations in the study area . In Pocket m~re h~ 1. Location of the Central Appalachian Basin in the eastern United States . ...... 2 2. Carboniferous lithostratigraphic units of the Central Appalachian Basin . .... 3 3. Map of study area showing locations of cross sections ....... .. .. ... ..... 4 4. Stratigraphic framework of Mississippian rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin . 5 5. Stratigraphic frarmework of Pennsylvanian rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin . .............. ........... ........... ....... ... ....... ..... 9 6. Cross section of mid-Carboniferous units along Cumberland Mountain . 1O 7. Reinterpretation of Englund and Delaney's (1966) cross section (Fig. 6) . ...... 11 8. Distribution of Warren Point Sandstone and laterally equivalent lithologies of the Breathitt Group . 12 9. Distribution of Sewanee Sandstone and laterally equivalent lithologies of the Breathitt Group . 13 10.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval
    University of Arkansas, Fayetteville ScholarWorks@UARK Theses and Dissertations 8-2018 Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent Forrest Dalton McFarlin University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation McFarlin, Forrest Dalton, "Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 2952. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2952 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Stratigraphic Evaluation of the St. Joe-Boone Boundary Interval, Kinderhookian-Osagean Series, Lower Mississippian System, Tri-State Region, Southern Midcontinent A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geology by Forrest Dalton McFarlin Texas Christian University Bachelor of Science in Geology, 2015 August 2018 University of Arkansas This thesis is approved for recommendation to the Graduate Council. _____________________________________ Walter Manger, PhD Thesis Director _____________________________________ Adriana Potra, PhD Committee Member _____________________________________ Thomas McGilvery, PhD Committee Member ©2018 by Forrest Dalton McFarlin All Rights Reserved Abstract The Lower Mississippian interval comprises a single, third-order, eustatic cycle subdivided lithostratigraphically into the St. Joe Limestone (Hopkins 1893) and overlying Boone Formation (Branner 1891, Simonds 1891) with type areas in northern Arkansas.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of Altenburg Quadrangle, Jackson County
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF ALTENBURG QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W. Shilts, Executive Director JACKSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND PERRY COUNTY, MISSOURI STATEMAP Altenburg-BG ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY E. Donald McKay III, Interim Director Mary J. Seid, Joseph A. Devera, Allen L. Weedman, and Dewey H. Amos 2009 360 GEOLOGIC UNITS ) ) ) 14 Qal Alluvial deposits ) 13 18 Quaternary Pleistocene and Holocene 17 360 ) 15 360 16 14 0 36 ) 13 Qf Fan deposits ) Unconformity Qal ) & 350 tl Lower Tradewater Formation Atokan ) ) Pennsylvanian 360 ) &cv Caseyville Formation Morrowan 24 360 ) Unconformity ) 17 Upper Elviran undivided, Meu ) Waltersburg to top of Degonia 19 20 Qal 21 22 23 ) 24 ) Mv Vienna Limestone 360 o ) 3 Mts ) 350 Mts Tar Springs Sandstone ) 20 360 ) Mgd 360 30 ) Mgd Glen Dean Limestone ) 21 350 360 Mts 29 ) Qal Hardinsburg Sandstone and J N Mhg Chesterian ) Golconda Formations h Æ Qal Mav anc 28 27 Br ) N oJ 26 25 JN 85 N ) Cypress Sandstone through J Mcpc Dsl 500 Paint Creek Formation JN N ) J o Mts N 5 J s ) Dgt 600 J N 70 J N Mgd Yankeetown Formation s ) Myr Db 80 28 Æ and Renault Sandstone N J 29 N J N ) Sb J Mgd Mississippian o Dgt Ssc 25 Clines o N 25 Msg 27 ) Qal J 80 s 3 Mav Aux Vases Sandstone N J N Mts o MILL J MISSISSIPPI 34 ) Qal J N ) N J Dsl 35 N 26 J o N 25 J Mgd Mgd ) Msg Ste. Genevieve Limestone 500 o Db DITCH J 20 Mgd N N N ) J J o RIVER o N 600 J 80 N ) 10 o J Mav Æ Msl St.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Prater and Vansant Quadrangles, Virginia Commonwealth of Virgin Ia
    VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 52 GEOLOGY OF THE PRATER AND VANSANT QUADRANGLES, VIRGINIA Jack E. Nolde and Martin L. Mitchell with sections on subsurface stratigraphy and gas resources by Joan K. Polzin COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGIN IA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert c. Milici, commissioner of Mineral Resources and state Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGINIA 1984 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 52 GEOLOGY OF THE PRATER AND VANSANT QUADRANGLES, VI RGINIA Jack E. Nolde and Martin L. Mitchell with sections on subsurface stratigraphy and gas resources by Joan K. Polzin COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert c. Milici, commissioner of Mineral Resources and state Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGI NIA 1984 COVER PHOTO: Jewell Coal and Coke Company coking operation on Dismal Creek in northeast Vansant quadrangle (photo by J.H. Grantham). VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 52 GEOLOGY OF THE PRATER AND VANSANT QUADRANGLES, VIRG I NIA Jack E. Nolde and Martin L. Mitchell with sections on subsurface stratigraphy and gas resources by Joan K. Polzin COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1984 DEPARTM ENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia FRED W. WALKER, Director JERALD F. MOORE, Deputy Director BOARD HENRY T. N. GRAVES, Chairman, Luray ADOLF U. HONKALA, Vice Chairman, Midlothian FRANK ARMSTRONG. III. Winchester RICK E. BURNELL, Virginia Beach GWENDOLYN JO M. CARLBERG, Alexandria WILBUR S. DOYLE, Martinsville BRUCE B. GRAY, Waverly MILDRED LAYNE, Williamsburg JOHN E.
    [Show full text]
  • East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 Lrrs N and S
    East and Central Farming and Forest Region and Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region: 12 LRRs N and S Brad D. Lee and John M. Kabrick 12.1 Introduction snowfall occurs annually in the Ozark Highlands, the Springfield Plateau, and the St. Francois Knobs and Basins The central, unglaciated US east of the Great Plains to the MLRAs. In the southern half of the region, snowfall is Atlantic coast corresponds to the area covered by LRR N uncommon. (East and Central Farming and Forest Region) and S (Atlantic Basin Diversified Farming Region). These regions roughly correspond to the Interior Highlands, Interior Plains, 12.2.2 Physiography Appalachian Highlands, and the Northern Coastal Plains. The topography of this region ranges from broad, gently rolling plains to steep mountains. In the northern portion of 12.2 The Interior Highlands this region, much of the Springfield Plateau and the Ozark Highlands is a dissected plateau that includes gently rolling The Interior Highlands occur within the western portion of plains to steeply sloping hills with narrow valleys. Karst LRR N and includes seven MLRAs including the Ozark topography is common and the region has numerous sink- Highlands (116A), the Springfield Plateau (116B), the St. holes, caves, dry stream valleys, and springs. The region also Francois Knobs and Basins (116C), the Boston Mountains includes many scenic spring-fed rivers and streams con- (117), Arkansas Valley and Ridges (118A and 118B), and taining clear, cold water (Fig. 12.2). The elevation ranges the Ouachita Mountains (119). This region comprises from 90 m in the southeastern side of the region and rises to 176,000 km2 in southern Missouri, northern and western over 520 m on the Springfield Plateau in the western portion Arkansas, and eastern Oklahoma (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTROLS on DOLOMITIZATION of the UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE in SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department Of
    CONTROLS ON DOLOMITIZATION OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE IN SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY COLLIN JAMES GRAY Department of Geological Sciences APPROVED: Dr. Katherine Giles, Ph.D., Chair Dr. Richard Langford, Ph.D. Dr. Matthew Johnston, Ph.D. Charles Ambler, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Collin James Gray 2015 Dedication I dedicate my thesis work to my family. My dedicated and loving parents, Michael and Deborah Gray have always supported me and provided words of encouragement during the struggles of my research. The support provided was second to none and I could not imagine reaching this point in my education without them. I also dedicate this thesis to my two brothers, Michael and Nathan Gray and my sister Nicole Gray. Without these role models I cannot imagine where my education would have ended. I will always appreciate the support provided by all three of you and consider you to be role models that I can always look up to. CONTROLS ON DOLOMITIZATION OF THE UPPER ORDOVICIAN TRENTON LIMESTONE IN SOUTH-CENTRAL KENTUCKY by COLLIN JAMES GRAY, B.S. GEOLOGY THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Geological Sciences THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO December 2015 Acknowledgements I wish to thank my committee whose time and expertise provided excellent input into my research. Dr. Katherine Giles, my M.S. supervisor provided guidance and provided endless suggestions and recommendations throughout my research while continuously motivating me to continue my education.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of and Climatic Indicators in the Westphalian a New
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 7:47 p.m. Atlantic Geology Geology of and climatic indicators in the Westphalian A New Glasgow formation, Nova Scotia, Canada: implications for the genesis of coal and of sandstone-hosted lead deposits F. W. Chandler Volume 34, Number 1, Spring 1998 Article abstract By the Late Carboniferous, Late Paleozoic northward drift of the continent URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/ageo34_1art03 Laurentia had carried Nova Scotia from the southern dry climate belt into the equatorial rainy belt. Carboniferous amalgamation of Laurentia with the See table of contents southern continent Gondwana enclosed the area within the new supercontinent Pangea, imposing a gradually drying seasonal tropical climate. Disagreement exists on whether the early Pennsylvanian climate of the Publisher(s) Euramerican coal province was everwet or seasonal. Abundant paleopedological evidence, including calcrete-bearing vertisols, shows that Atlantic Geoscience Society during formation of Westphalian C to Stephanian coals in Nova Scotia, the climate was tropical and seasonal with a pronounced dry season, but ISSN interpretation of Westphalian A-B coal-bearing sequences lacks this form of evidence. Development of calcrete-bearing vertisols in alluvial fan deposits of 0843-5561 (print) the Westphalian A New Glasgow formation indicate that a tropical climate with 1718-7885 (digital) a pronounced dry season was already in force by early Westphalian time. During the dry season, the coal swamps of the early Westphalian Joggins and Explore this journal Springhill Mines formations were fed by groundwater from coeval alluvial fan deposits of the Polly Brook Formation at the basin margin. Sedimento-logical evidence indicates that, similarly, groundwater flowed northward from the toe Cite this article of the New Glasgow alluvial fan, but correlative palustrine sediments have not been found on land in the New Glasgow area.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Development and Problems Within the Pennsylvanian Nomenclature of Ohio.1
    Historical Development and Problems Within the Pennsylvanian Nomenclature of Ohio.1 GLENN E. LARSEN, OHIO Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey, Fountain Sq., Bldg. B, Columbus, OH 43224 ABSTRACT. An analysis of the historical development of the Pennsylvanian stratigraphic nomenclature, as used in Ohio, has helped define and clarify problems inherent in Ohio's stratigraphic nomenclature. Resolution of such problems facilitates further development of a useful stratigraphy and philosophy for mapping. Investigations of Pennsylvanian-age rocks in Ohio began as early as 1819- From 1858 to 1893, investigations by Newberry, I. C. White, and Orton established the stratigraphic framework upon which the present-day nomenclature is based. During the 1950s, the cyclothem concept was used to classify and correlate Pennsylvanian lithologic units. This classification led to a proliferation of stratigraphic terms, as almost every lithologic type was named and designated as a member of a cyclothem. By the early 1960s, cyclothems were considered invalid as a lithostratigraphic classification. Currently, Pennsylvanian nomenclature of Ohio, as used by the Ohio Division of Geological Survey, consists of four groups containing 123 named beds, with no formal formations or members. In accordance with the 1983 North American Stratigraphic code, the Ohio Division of Geological Survey considers all nomenclature below group rank as informal. OHIO J. SCI. 91 (1): 69-76, 1991 INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION Understanding the historical development of Pennsyl- The Early 1800s vanian stratigraphy in Ohio is important to the Ohio The earliest known references to Pennsylvanian-age Division of Geological Survey (OGS). Such an under- rocks in Ohio are found in Atwater's (1819) report on standing of Pennsylvanian stratigraphy helps define Belmont County, and an article by Granger (1821) on plant stratigraphic nomenclatural problems in order to make fossils collected near Zanesville, Muskingum County.
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And
    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Scottsboro 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Jackson County, Alabama
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA QUADRANGLE SERIES 63 PLATE (PRINCETON) o 5 o 86 07'30" 581000m E 82 583 5 5 (MUD CREEK) 5 5 5 440,000 FEET 5 5 5 86 00' (WANNVILLE) A 5' 84 85 86 87 R 5 E R 6 E 2'30" 88 89 90 91 34o45' eD D e 34o45' CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS D Mm Mb Mb D Mb D Qal Qal Quaternary Mm CENOZOIC D unconformity 3845000m N D e !pv D 3845 Pennsylvanian D D D Mp !pv D Mb Mb Mh Qal Mississippian D Qal D Mp Mp Mm Qal Qal 3844 D Mtfpm D Qal 38 Mb 44 unconformity Dc Devonian PALEOZOIC Mp Qal 1,540,000 MhD D Qal FEET D e unconformity Mb Mb T 3 S Srm D T 3 S Silurian T 4 S D T 4 S D unconformity D D Mm 3843 D Osli Qal D e D 38 D !pv 43 Mp Qal !pv Onvsr Ordovician unconformity O\k Cambrian D D Qal 3842 Qal e 38 42 MhD MhD DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS D Qal Alluvium (Quaternary)—Unconsolidated sand, silt, clay, and chert gravel derived from local bedrock. Mb D D Mb !pv Pottsville Formation (Pennsylvanian)—Light-gray, medium- to coarse-grained, quartzose D D sandstone locally containing scattered to abundant, well-rounded, white quartz pebbles; quartz D D !pv pebble and ferruginous claystone conglomerate is locally present at the base. Interbeds and 38 D 41 Qal 3841 intervals of dark-gray shale and mudstone and wavy-bedded sandstone are locally common.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Texas at Arlington Dissertation Template
    CHEMOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOCEANOGRAPHY OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN BARNETT FORMATION, SOUTHERN FORT WORTH BASIN, TEXAS, USA by JAMES DANIEL HOELKE Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN GEOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON AUGUST 2011 Copyright © by James Hoelke 2011 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Harry Rowe, for his patience, time and energy during these past few years. I have learned much from him. This thesis would not have been possible without him. Second, I would like to thank the members of my graduate committee, Dr. Andrew Hunt and Dr. Robert Loucks, for the knowledge and insight you have provided in class and in conversations. I would also like to thank Dr. Christopher Scotese for assistance and advice with paleogeographic maps. I would also like to thank several members of the Texas Bureau of Economic Geology. I would like to thank especially Dr. Stephen Ruppel for providing core access and material support for this project as well as advice. I would also like to thank James Donnelly, Nathan Ivicic, Kenneth Edwards, and Josh Lambert for core handling assistance. I want to thank Henry Francis and Andrea Conner at the Kentucky Geological Survey for providing geochemical analyses. I would also like to thank some members of our geochemistry research group. Niki Hughes provided substantial assistance especially with calibrations and great encouragement. I would also like to thank Jak Kearns, Pukar Mainali, Krystin Robinson, and Robert Nikirk for their help.
    [Show full text]