DOCSLIB.ORG

Trust in Public Institutions: Trends and Implications for Economic Security

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trust in Public Institutions: Trends and Implications for Economic Security POLICY BRIEF NO108 Trust in public institutions: Trends and implications for economic security WHY SHOULD WE CARE ABOUT TRUST? Trust is integral to the functioning of any society. Trust in each Summary other, in our public institutions and in our leaders are all essential The legitimacy of public institutions is crucial for ingredients for social and economic progress, allowing people to building peaceful and inclusive societies. While levels of cooperate with and express solidarity for one another.1 It allows trust in institutions vary significantly across countries, public bodies to plan and execute policies and deliver services. Greater public trust has been found to improve compliance in regu- opinion surveys suggest that there has been a decline lations and tax collections, even respect for property rights.2 It also in trust in public institutions in recent decades. gives confidence to consumers and investors, crucial to creating Economic insecurity—which the COVID-19 crisis jobs and the functioning of economies more broadly. Success in threatens to exacerbate—and perceptions of poor or achieving each of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)— corrupt government performance undermine the social from eliminating poverty (SDG1), to combatting climate change contract and are closely linked to declines in institutional (SDG13), to building peaceful and inclusive societies (SDG16)— trust. Rebuilding public trust in the light of the current will depend on citizens’ and businesses’ trust in public institutions crisis demands services that work for everyone and and in each other. jobs that provide income security, as well as more Governments have also drawn on public trust to effectively address every stage of the COVID-19 pandemic response—from inclusive institutions. containment, to mitigation, to vaccinations. Early evidence has found that higher levels of confidence in national public institutions is associated with lower national COVID-19 mortality rates.3 This MEASURING TRUST is consistent with evidence from previous health crises—including Measuring whether people trust their institutions and each other SARS, H1N1 and Ebola—where high public trust was found to be a is difficult. Opinion surveys include questions that ask directly crucial determinant for successful responses.4 Governments will about a respondent’s levels of trust in other people, such as neigh- need to count on, or in cases where government responses were bours (interpersonal trust), or trust in various public institutions largely found to be ineffective, to regain public trust as they plan —including national Governments, the police and the media. The and implement an inclusive recovery. World Values Survey, the Gallup World Poll and various regional However, there is growing concern about a crisis in public Barometers, among others, all ask questions on institutional trust trust that is contributing to, among other things, support for or confidence, allowing for cross-country comparisons. With most extreme political views, increasing public discontent, protests and series starting in the late 1990s, they also allow for an assessment in some cases violent conflict.5 The UN Secretary-General recently of trends over recent decades. Longer-run trends are only available warned of a “trust deficit” that threatens to undermine progress for a handful of European countries and the United States. towards the SDGs.6 Opinion surveys raise questions about peoples’ interpreta- tions of an issue, especially across countries and cultures. Concepts 1 Trust is defined here as “a person’s belief that another person or institution will act consistently with their expectations of positive behaviour”, of trust, trustworthiness, integrity, confidence, competency and following OECD, 2017. OECD Guidelines on Measuring Trust. expertise, for instance, may all be rolled in a single-issue ‘trust’ 2 Citrin and Stoker, 2018. Political Trust in a Cynical Age. item in surveys.7 In addition, opinions may not necessarily reflect 3 Elgar and others, 2020. The trouble with trust: Time-series analysis of social capital, income inequality, and COVID-19 deaths in 84 countries respondent’s actual behaviour. 4 For example, see Chuang and others, 2015. Social Capital and Health- Indirect methods of measuring trust have also been used. Protective Behavior Intentions in an Influenza Pandemic; Freimuth and others, 2014. Trust During the Early Stages of the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic In democracies for example, voter turnout has been used as an 8 5 See, for example, Foreign Policy, 2020. The Global Trust Crisis; Algan and indirect measure of trust in political institutions. Per capita others, 2017. The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism. 6 United Nations, 2020. Secretary-General Highlights ‘Trust Deficit’ amid Rising Global Turbulence, in Remarks to Security Council Debate on 7 Seyd, 2016. How Should We Measure Political Trust? ‘Upholding United Nations Charter’. 8 Grönlund and Setälä, 2007. Political Trust, Satisfaction and Voter Turnout Authors: Jonathan Perry, Global Dialogue for Social Development Branch, Division for Inclusive Social Development, UN DESA. For further information, contact [email protected], or visit www.un.org/development/desa/publications/ June 2021 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs 1 consumption of bottled water is another possible proxy measure of Figure 1 trust in the institutions associated with the water supply. However, Percentage of the population across three regions the application of these methods is often limited to specific country with confidence or trust in their national Government studies. It can also be challenging or costly to gather sufficient or Parliament indirect observations to draw meaningful conclusions. Elections for instance, usually happen only once every four or five years. 60 A comprehensive review by the OECD found that despite AFRO their limitations, opinion surveys remain a simple, intuitive and cost-effective method of measuring trust and in particular identi- 50 fying general patterns and trends over time and across countries. Evidence suggests that survey questions on trust are well under- Average stood by respondents and that findings from different opinion 40 9 LATINO surveys are consistent with each other. In-depth country studies EURO often complement data from various sources—direct and indirect —to provide a fuller picture. 30 TRENDS IN INSTITUTIONAL TRUST Evidence from opinion surveys shows that levels of institutional trust vary significantly across countries. Higher income countries 20 tend to enjoy higher levels of institutional trust than lower income 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 countries, for instance, while opinion polls also suggest that trust in national Government is higher in countries with authoritarian Note: Author’s calculations (unweighted averages) based on data from Eurobarometer, Afrobarometer and Latinobarometro. Eurobarometer figures taken 10 Governments than in those with established democracies. This since 2004 EU expansion onwards to maximize countries included, while avoiding latter relationship, however may be affected by the challenges with composition effects. Two values per year but only one selected here (earliest conducting opinion surveys in strict authoritarian countries. In survey in year taken). Afrobarometer data consists of only 6 waves, with waves general, large cross-country differences tend to persist over time, covering 2/3 years of field work and responses relate to “trust in parliament” (as there is no “trust in government” question on the survey). Reports as latest year suggesting that those born into societies with high levels of trust in range. For Afrobarometer and Latinobarometer, graph combines “a lot” and will be more trusting (and vice versa). “somewhat” into single positive value and “none” and “not much” into a single While data for long-run trends are limited, the data available negative response. Graph excludes “don’t know/no response” and calculations only include country averages with continuous data, to avoid composition effects. show a marked decrease in institutional trust in developed coun- tries. In the United States, trust in the national government has declined from 73 per cent in 1958 to 24 per cent in 2021.11 Western from 55 per cent to 46 per cent over the same period.14 Data from Europe has seen a similar steady decline in public trust since the the Eurobarometer shows trust in political parties in countries of 1970s. 12 However current European levels of trust are not as low as the European Union has remained low, hovering between 15 and in the United States (see figure 1). These trends may be partly due 20 per cent on average between 2000 and 2019, while trust in the to generational changes in attitudes towards government although, press has also stayed relatively stable, around 45 per cent over the in the United States, there are only small differences between same period.15 Nonetheless, substantial differences between coun- consecutive cohorts in terms of trust. Currently, the percentage of Millennials in the US (now ages 23-38) who report trusting the tries and regions remain, as Figure 1 partly shows. Government—25 per cent—is close to that of older generations.13 It is still too soon to assess the overall impact of the COVID-19 More recent data from opinion surveys across a broader crisis on levels of trust. The data available suggest that, after an range of countries show a decline in trust in most public
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eurobarometer 513 Climate Change
    Special Eurobarometer 513 Climate Change Report Fieldwork: March - April 2021 This document does not represent the point of view of the European Commission. The interpretations and opinions contained in it are solely those of the authors. Project title Special Eurobarometer 513 Climate, Report Language version EN Catalogue number ML-03-21-256-EN-N ISBN 978-92-76-38399-4 DOI 10.2834/437 © European Union, 2021 https://www.europa.eu/eurobarometer Photo credit: Getty Images Special Eurobarometer 513 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 I. EUROPEAN PERCEPTIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE 8 1. Perceptions of climate change as a global problem 9 2. Perceived seriousness of climate change 22 II. TAKING ACTION TO TACKLE CLIMATE CHANGE 26 1. Responsibility for tackling climate change 27 2. Personal action to tackle climate change 34 3. Types of individual action 39 III. ATTITUDES TO FIGHTING CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE TRANSITION TO CLEAN ENERGIES 49 1. Attitudes towards taking action on climate change 51 2. Attitudes towards reducing fossil fuel imports 54 3. Attitudes towards the economic benefits of promoting EU expertise in clean technologies outside the EU 57 4. Attitudes to public financial support for clean energies as opposed to fossil fuel subsidies 60 5. Attitudes to adapting to the adverse impacts of climate change 64 6. Attitudes to tackling climate change and environmental issues as a priority to improve public health 67 7. Attitudes on the trade-off between costs caused by climate change versus the costs of a green transition 69 IV. LOOKING TO THE FUTURE 72 1. Current national governments action to tackle climate change 73 2.
    [Show full text]
  • EFAMRO / ESOMAR Position Statement on the Proposal for an Eprivacy Regulation —
    EFAMRO / ESOMAR Position Statement on the Proposal for an ePrivacy Regulation — April 2017 EFAMRO/ESOMAR Position Statement on the Proposal for an ePrivacy Regulation April 2017 00. Table of contents P3 1. About EFAMRO and ESOMAR 2. Key recommendations P3 P4 3. Overview P5 4. Audience measurement research P7 5. Telephone and online research P10 6. GDPR framework for research purposes 7. List of proposed amendments P11 a. Recitals P11 b. Articles P13 2 EFAMRO/ESOMAR Position Statement on the Proposal for an ePrivacy Regulation April 2017 01. About EFAMRO and ESOMAR This position statement is submitted In particular our sector produces research on behalf of EFAMRO, the European outcomes that guide decisions of public authorities (e.g. the Eurobarometer), the non- Research Federation, and ESOMAR, profit sector including charities (e.g. political the World Association for Data, opinion polling), and business (e.g. satisfaction Research and Insights. In Europe, we surveys, product improvement research). represent the market, opinion and In a society increasingly driven by data, our profession ensures the application of appropriate social research and data analytics methodologies, rigour and provenance controls sectors, accounting for an annual thus safeguarding access to quality, relevant, turnover of €15.51 billion1. reliable, and aggregated data sets. These data sets lead to better decision making, inform targeted and cost-effective public policy, and 1 support economic development - leading to ESOMAR Global Market Research 2016 growth and jobs. 02. Key Recommendations We support the proposal for an ePrivacy Amendment of Article 8 and Recital 21 to enable Regulation to replace the ePrivacy Directive as research organisations that comply with Article this will help to create a level playing field in a true 89 of the General Data Protection Regulation European Digital Single Market whilst increasing (GDPR) to continue conducting independent the legal certainty for organisations operating in audience measurement research activities for different EU member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Solvay 224 Avenue Louise 1050 Brussels
    Mobilise! Incorporating Mobile Phones in Social and Policy-oriented Surveys ALEC M GALLUP FUTURE OF 1SURVEY RESEARCH FORUM 14 October, 2009 Hôtel Solvay 224 Avenue Louise 1050 Brussels % Dear Attendee, Mobile phones have had a remarkable impact on the world in a relatively short period of time. In all surveys, the overriding consideration is to reach all members of the public, young or old, male or female, employed or self- employed. In the nineties, fixed-line telephone coverage reached almost saturation point, but times are changing. In Europe, countries such as Finland and the Czech Republic now have a majority of citizens who are "mobile-only". Furthermore, as mobile phone ownership and usage is currently higher among certain groups, such as younger members of the population, the potential arises for mobile-phone non- coverage bias. This was a topic widely debated during the 2004 US Presidential election. Further discussion and research on the topic is vital. That's why Gallup has brought together the world's leading experts to thrash out issues that will undoubtedly impact the future of social research. Earlier this year, we were saddened by the death of Alec Gallup, a consummate polling professional who served the company for 60 years. If he was still with us, he would be watching the increase of the mobile-phone population with interest. Alec Gallup understood polling from A to Z and he knew that that the future of survey research depended on methodologies that would continue to give an equal opportunity of being polled … to all members of the public Bi-annual series of seminars: Future of Surveys We would therefore like to welcome you to "The 1st Alec Gallup Future of Survey Research Forum: Incorporating Mobile Phones in Social and Policy-oriented Surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eu and Public Opinions: a Love-Hate Relationship?
    THE EU AND PUBLIC OPINIONS: A LOVE-HATE RELATIONSHIP? Salvatore Signorelli Foreword by Julian Priestley NOVEMBER 2012 STUDIES & REPORTS 93 The EU and public opinions: A love-hate relationship? TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 INTRODUCTION 9 1. European public opinion analysis instruments 12 1.1. The origins of the Eurobarometer: a brief overview 12 1.2. Deciphering European public opinion: quantitative polls 19 1.2.1. Standard EBS: regular public opinion monitoring 20 1.2.2. Special EB: in-depth thematic surveys 26 1.2.3. EB Flash: rapid thematic surveys 29 1.2.4. Sociological criticism of quantitative opinion polls 31 1.3. Qualitative Studies: analysis of reactions, feelings and motivations 33 1.4. Deliberative Polling® 37 1.5. National polls of the 27 Member States 43 2. The work of public opinion analysis within the institutions 44 2.1. The change in political context and in objectives for the EU: the rise of public opinion 44 The EU and public opinions: A love-hate relationship? 2.2. The European Commission: “driving force” of public opinion analysis in the EU 47 2.2.1. A role of interface in drafting Eurobarometer surveys 50 2.2.2. The “national” level of public opinion analysis at the Commission 52 2.3. The work of public opinion analysis at the European Parliament 54 2.3.1. An information tool 56 2.3.2. The “national” level of public opinion analysis at the European Parliament 57 2.4. The role of the other institutions 58 2.4.1. European Council 58 2.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • European Survey Data on Attitudes to Equality and Human Rights Technical Paper
    RESEARCH SERIES European Survey Data on Attitudes to Equality and Human Rights Technical Paper Éamonn Fahey, Doireann O’Brien Helen Russell, Frances McGinnity RESEARCH SERIES European Survey Data on Attitudes to Equality and Human Rights Technical Paper Éamonn Fahey, Doireann O’Brien Helen Russell, Frances McGinnity This report was written by Eamonn Fahey, Doireann O’Brien, Helen Russell and Frances McGinnity. It was prepared for the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission by the Economic and Social Research Institute as part of the Research Programme on Human Rights and Equality. The report has been peer-reviewed prior to publication. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Economic and Social Research Institute or the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission. The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission was established under statute on 1 November 2014 to protect and promote human rights and equality in Ireland, to promote a culture of respect for human rights, equality and intercultural understanding, to promote understanding and awareness of the importance of human rights and equality, and to work towards the elimination of human rights abuses and discrimination. The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) is an independent research institute working towards a vision of ‘Informed policy for a better Ireland’. The ESRI seeks to support sustainable economic growth and social progress in Ireland by providing a robust knowledge base capable of providing effective solutions to public policy challenges. Available to download from www.esri.ie and www.ihrec.ie 2019. Copyright is held jointly by the Economic and Social Research Institute and the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • European Identity and Media Effects: a Quantitative Comparative Analysis
    European Identity and Media Effects: A Quantitative Comparative Analysis Doctoral Thesis Department of Economic Sciences and Media Technische Universität Ilmenau Doctoral Student: Waqas Ejaz Supervised by: Prof. Dr. Jens Wolling Jun.-Prof. Dr. Emese Domahidi Prof. Dr. Volker Gehrau Submission Date: 1st of April, 2019 PhD Thesis Defense: 20th of August, 2019 DOI: 10.22032/dbt.39483 URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:ilm1-2019000328 To my parents, Ejaz and Farzana, for trying your best, To my children, Hadi and Hasna, for all the joy you bring in my life, To my love, Arfa, for all that I am and have IV Acknowledgments Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Prof. Jens Wolling who since our first ever meeting trusted me more than I have ever trusted myself. It was his confidence, continuous support, motivation and immense knowledge that helped me throughout my Ph.D. study. Without a doubt, he is amongst the two people to whom I owe this achievement. Besides my advisor, my sincere thanks also go to Prof. Dr. Emese Domahidi, who together with Prof. Wolling, provided me an opportunity in the last year of my dissertation to work on an ambitious research project. In addition to the opportunity, it was her work ethics and critical perspective that made me see things in a way I did not before. I thank my colleagues for listening to my mundane and half cooked research ideas during fine summer afternoons and for all the stimulating discussions we had in the last six years. Last but not the least, I would like to thank my family: my parents who have always trusted me, to my siblings for bearing me, and finally, my wife for being there and supporting me in the toughest of times.
    [Show full text]
  • Flash Eurobarometer 315 January-February 2011
    GESIS Study ID ..................................................... ZA5470 Flash Eurobarometer 315 January-February 2011 Attitudes of European Entrepreneurs towards eco-innovation Basic questionnaire The GALLUP Organization FL315 Attitudes of European entrepreneurs towards eco‐innovation Flash Eurobarometer survey Definition of eco‐innovation: Eco‐innovation is the introduction of any new or significantly improved product (good or service), process, organisational change or marketing solution that reduces the use of natural resources (including materials, energy, water and land) and decreases the release of harmful substances across the whole life‐cycle. D1. How many employees do you have in your company? [READ OUT – ONLY ONE ANSWER] ‐ Less than 10 ...................................................................... [THANK AND TERMINATE] ‐ 10‐49......................................................................................................................... 1 ‐ 50‐249....................................................................................................................... 2 ‐ 250 or more ...................................................................... [THANK AND TERMINATE] ‐ [DK/NA] ............................................................................ [THANK AND TERMINATE] D2. What is the annual turnover of your company? [READ OUT – ONLY ONE ANSWER] ‐ up to €2 million ........................................................................................................ 1 ‐ €2‐10 million ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Data Collection in the EU: Can't Seem to Find The
    Ethnic data collection in the EU: can’t seem to find the way Lilla Farkas, race ground coordinator, European Network of legal experts on gender equality and non-discrimination,, [email protected] Reporting flurry 1. EDI Report 2014 - OSF & ENAR 2. European Commission 1. Ethnic Data Report and Handbook update 2016 2. Guidance note on hate crimes November 2018 3. FRA: 1. EU MIDIS 2016, 2. hate crime map, 3. PAD November 2018 4. ECRI: general recommendations hate crime, hate speech, Afrophobia EU context - political • Agenda setting & multilevel governance: allies, foes and competitors • Equality data: a problem for many - coalition with other grounds? • Recognised & non-recognised racialised groups - coalition? • European silence on race - including among the racialised groups! • Wallerstein and Balibar 1991: race and gender within class • The Holocaust prism • Migrant and Roma integration frames EU context - jurisprudential 1. The meaning of racial or ethnic origin under EU law 2017: historically contingent 2. ‘racial’ fragmentation: no dominant racial group 3. race reified in case law • = skin colour? as if racial minorities did not have an identity • Timishev v Russia, • Biao v Denmark - Islamophobic undertone • Feryn - Moroccans, xenophobia, Islamophobia or Afrophobia? • CHEZ and Jyske Finans: only ethnicity in RED? ICERD mis-used? • Attrey in CMLR, • Farkas in EADLR Key issues: categorization I. 1. Data on racial origin is seldom collected based on self- identification. 2. How to categorise descent: geographic origin and cultural/religious/linguistic traditions 3. How to link descent with skin colour 4. 30% of PAD Muslim - Islamophobia in Europe Categories: Maghreb, Sub-Saharan African, Other African? Categorization II.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Evidence Base and Monitoring
    Common evidence base and monitoring Jacek Moskalewicz Introduction Existing evidence shows that having a national alcohol policy by itself has a low impact on the alcohol burden. According to Karlsson & Österberg (2007), who analysed the impact of seven policy measures on alcohol consumption, only 2.5% of the overall impact can be attributed to the existence of national programmes or action plans compared to a 40% contribution from tax policies or 30% from restrictions on alcohol sales. One likely factor is that national programmes do not recommend evidence-based measures that may affect state or private economic interests (Gordon & Anderson, 2011). Monitoring and evaluation of the implementation and effectiveness of alcohol policy programmes and action plans seem to be crucial to strengthen their impact (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2011a). However, implementation and evaluation reports (if they exist at all) rarely feed into the development of consecutive plans or programmes. Usually a new programme, like its precedents, is the result of a compromise between economic and health interests. Monitoring approaches and their limitations Statistics Statistics for health, economic and other harm seem to be the most reliable as they have usually been in use for decades, are provided by well-established government agencies and are relatively well standardized, thanks to numerous international agencies. In addition, some agencies, including the EC and WHO, retrieve, clean and additionally standardize collected statistics. No matter their technical accuracy, however, statistical sources are human products and as such are heavily culture-specific or biased. Sales statistics, which usually serve as the source for estimation of recorded consumption, often suffer from underestimation of real consumption owing to the existence of other sources of supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Insights
    INTELLIGENT INSIGHTS Introducing ourselves January 2021 2 OUR VALUES To us, interviewing is all about getting the bigger picture. INDEPENDENCE INTELLIGENT MARKET RESEARCH FAIRNESS Political and economic Decision-based questions No standard tools but independence and clear recommendations customized research designs TRADITION LIGHT BULB MOMENTS APPRECIATING RESPONDENTS Decades of experience in Reveal hidden aspects An appreciative approach with participants quantitative and qualitative research through surprising insights leads to high-quality results STRATEGIC REPOSITIONING EXPLORING CUSTOMERS Integrated approaches, innovative methods, Valuable insights into the thinking state-of-the-art evaluation and survey and emotions of respondents technologies EFFICIENCY CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY We solely inquire about aspects that lead to a Comprehensive knowledge of psychological better understanding of the market theories and survey procedures 3 OUR SKILLS A passion for research, based on a solid foundation of experience and knowledge. EXPERIENCE EXPERTISE QUALITY ASSURANCE INNOVATION . In 1949, Gallup was founded as . Interdisciplinary team . Compliance with applicable . State-of-the-art survey the first Austrian market and (sociologists, psychologists, professional ethics of the VMÖ technology opinion research institute, publicists, political scientists, (Austrian Market Research (online panel certified to ISO, followed by the Austrian Institute economists and statisticians) Association) and ESOMAR CATI studio employing the RLD for Motivation Research in 1967 method, mobile research, . High level of professional . Compliance with data protection tablets with GPS receiver) . Comprehensive and expertise and long-lasting regulations of the current Data interdisciplinary databases and company affiliation by Protection Act in Austria . Modern analysis programmes comparative values (e.g., employees . Quality assurance at all . Development of proprietary 15,000 impact tests on .
    [Show full text]
  • Eurobarometer 91.3
    GESIS Study number ZA7572 ICPSR Study Number [not yet assigned] EUROBAROMETER 91.3 Carried out by Kantar Public Brussels on request of the EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General Communication (COMM.A.3.: Media monitoring and Eurobarometer), between April 9 and April 26, 2019. Archive pre-release, dataset version 1.0.0 as of September 30, 2019 This dataset edition has not yet passed the complete archive processing and documentation, such as complete variable documentation for online data browsing and analysis in ZACAT (https://zacat.gesis.org). Basic archival checks have been performed; technical variables, protocol variables and variable labels have been adapted to archive standards for the EUROBAROMETER series. Proposed citation European Commission, Brussels: Eurobarometer 91.3, April 2019. Kantar Public, Brussels [Producer]; GESIS, Cologne [Publisher]: ZA7572, dataset version 1.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.13372 Survey instruments For question wording, answer category text, interviewer instructions or question routing, please see the BASIC BILINGUAL QUESTIONNAIRE and the respective national field questionnaires. The basic questionnaire also includes a technical description of this EUROBAROMETER survey. The national field questionnaires in the different language versions are available through the GESIS Eurobarometer web pages (STUDY PROFILES), the ZACAT online data catalogue, or the Eurobarometer study descriptions in the data holding catalogue (DBK), as soon as all embargos have been lifted, if applicable. Weighting information In general the Standard and Special Eurobarometer datasets provide for two types of weighting, a post-stratification weighting and a population size weighting. For each sample (country or lower level region) through the post-stratification weighting procedure a comparison is carried out between the sample composition and a proper universe description.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust in Government, Policy Effectiveness and the Governance Agenda
    Government at a Glance 2013 © OECD 2013 Chapter 1 Trust in government, policy effectiveness and the governance agenda The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. 19 1. TRUST IN GOVERNMENT, POLICY EFFECTIVENESS AND THE GOVERNANCE AGENDA Introduction The financial and economic crisis that started in 2008 led to a significant loss of trust in government. By 2012, on average only four out of ten people in OECD member countries expressed confidence in their government. As governments search for a path to economic recovery, the challenge they face is not only knowing what policies to choose, but also how to implement those policies. Yet, capacity to implement depends crucially on trust. Without trust in governments, markets and institutions, support for necessary reforms is difficult to mobilise, particularly where short-term sacrifices are involved and long-term gains might be less tangible. The sharp decline in trust in government is serving to underline that trust is an essential, yet often overlooked, ingredient in successful policy making. A decline in trust can lead to lower rates of compliance with rules and regulations. Citizens and businesses can also become more risk-averse, delaying investment, innovation and employment decisions that are essential to regain competitiveness and jumpstart growth. Nurturing trust represents an investment in economic recovery and social well-being for the future.
    [Show full text]