DOCSLIB.ORG

A New Foreign Policy for Ukraine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A New Foreign Policy for Ukraine International Centre for Policy Studies Institute of World Policy A NEW FOREIGN POLICY FOR UKRAINE EXPERT PERSPECTIVES Kyiv 2010 This publication was prepared by the International Centre for Policy Studies as part of a project implemented under the Ukraine National Initiatives to Enhance Reforms (UNITER) program, which is funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and implemented by Pact Ukraine. The publication of this re- port was made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of USAID, Pact Inc. or the United States Government. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transferred in any form or by any means, graphic, electronic, or including photocopying or by any information storage retrieval system, without proper reference to the original source. This publication was prepared in collaboration with the Institute of World Policy. Project manager: Sacha Tessier-Stall Senior expert: Aliona Hetmanchuk Project coordinators: Kateryna Zarembo, Serhiy Solodkyi English translator: Lidia Wolanskyj Design and Layout: Tetiana Ivanko The opinions expressed herein are strictly those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the International Centre for Policy Studies or the Institute of World Policy. TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ..............................................................................................................5 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................6 Ukraine and the World Today ..............................................................................16 I. Ukraine’s Key Partners Ukraine and Russia: Learning from mistakes .......................................................27 Ukraine and the EU: Integration from within ......................................................41 Ukraine and the United States: The Era of pragmatism .........................................56 Developing Regional Partnerships Ukraine and Poland: Neighbors divided by Europe ...............................................68 Ukraine and Romania: A Love-hate relationship ..................................................78 Ukraine and Moldova: Time to talk openly .........................................................84 Ukraine and Belarus: The Neighborhood see-saw ................................................91 Turkey: The Forgotten strategic partner .............................................................96 Ukraine and Georgia: United we stand ............................................................102 II. Ukraine’s priority areas Security Policy: Fitting in ...................................................................................111 Ukraine and Energy: When the past kills the future ..........................................123 Ukraine and the Environment: Together in Noah’s Ark ......................................137 About the Authors ............................................................................................149 FOREWORD The best-kept secret of the 2010 election campaign was a simple one: despite all the talk about economic and social policy, these fall outside the President’s pur- view. It is foreign and defense policy that constitute the President’s main con- stitutional prerogative. The absence of debate on this issue, due both to the economic crisis and to the ambivalent positions of the principal candidates, has led to intense speculation and to the perpetuation of myths surrounding the foreign policy stances of the main contenders. Viktor Yanukovych has worked hard to shed his image as a Kremlin pawn. Yulia Tymoshenko, after arguing for NATO membership, has spared no effort in demonstrating her ability to work with Moscow. Most of the other candidates argued for a non-bloc status of some sort. Ukraine’s main challenge today is not to make a choice between East and West, but to improve relations with both. The country needs to identify its key partners and define its foreign policy priorities. The new Head of State will have to choose between a range of potential strate- gies. One is the “multi-vectoral” balancing act perfected by Leonid Kuchma, which can yield major payoffs but requires great diplomatic nimbleness. An- other is making a clear “civilizational” choice, aligning foreign – and some- times domestic – policy with that of the EU or Russia. Or the new President may search for a “third way,” focusing on regional leadership, searching for new international partners, or even moving toward isolationism. It is essential that Ukraine’s new foreign policy be the subject of a substantive debate. To contribute to this discussion, two of Ukraine’s foremost think- tanks – the International Centre for Policy Studies and the Institute of World Policy – have brought together some of the finest foreign policy thinkers in the country, representing a wide range of viewpoints, to propose innovative directions. In the coming five years, Ukraine will have to balance a wide range of values and interests. Aimed at analysts and policymakers of all stripes, these pages are intended to structure the debate that must precede the fundamental choices ahead. Olga Shumylo Aliona HETMANCHUK Director Director International Centre for Policy Studies Institute of World Policy Foreword 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ukraine’s new President will face a daunting set of foreign policy challenges. The country’s relations with Russia, the EU, and the US are at their lowest point in years, the result of empty declarations and deficient strategic thinking. Never since independence has Kyiv been on such bad terms with both its western and its eastern partners simultaneously. In addition, Ukraine’s lack of strategy has hand- icapped its ability to pursue its national interest in several strategic areas—securi- ty, regional partnerships, energy security and increasingly, the environment. If Ukraine is to regain its international luster, it will have to think strategically. That means choosing key partners and issues – and defining clear strategies to- ward each. This report identifies three essential partners for Kyiv, and four pri- ority areas for Ukraine’s foreign policy. I. Ukraine’s Key Partners 1. Russia Serhyi Solodkyi Kyiv’s relations with Moscow have, since 2004, reached an unprecedented low. Restoring a good relationship with Russia must therefore top the new Presi- dent’s foreign policy agenda. Reestablishing a healthy relationship with Ukraine’s northern neighbor is an end in itself, but also a means: Brussels and Washington have tired of the political and economic instability caused by Ukraine-Russia spats, and both are looking to improve their own relationships with Moscow. At the same time, Russia itself has grown weary of what it sees as western interference in its sphere of influence, and it fears that other countries may emulate Ukraine’s decision to follow a different developmental model than its own. It will be up to Kyiv to avoid both unnecessary belligerence and the “unilateral loyalty” it has tended to display since independence. Selected recommendations launch frank dialogue with the Russian leadership on Ukraine’s Euro-At- lantic integration, through ministerial-level bilateral talks and/or trilateral consultations bringing together Ukraine, Russia, and NATO; foster and depoliticize the study of Ukrainian history in Ukraine and Russia; consolidate Ukraine’s position as an essential transit state for EU-bound Russian hydrocarbons, including by gaining support from abroad; 6 A New Foreign Policy for Ukraine: Expert perspectives make clear that Ukraine will not accept any foreign military presence (Rus- sian or otherwise) on its soil after the 2017 expiration of the Russian Black Sea Fleet’s lease in Sevastopol. 2. The European Union Tetiana Sylina Ukrainians—both Ukraine’s main political forces and its population as a whole—favor EU accession, which is seen as a means of enhancing the coun- try’s independence, territorial integrity, and economic and energy security. But Ukraine’s politicians seem unable to grasp what European integration demands of them, especially when it comes to crucial reforms. Years of unkept promises, political and economic instability, and a deteriorating relationship with Russia have seriously damaged Kyiv’s standing in the EU. Hence overcoming “Ukraine fatigue” in both Brussels and other European capitals will have to top the new President’s agenda. This will mean both pushing through internal reforms and developing more mature relationships with Ukraine’s foreign partners. Selected recommendations improve relations with Moscow; intensify diplomatic contacts with Germany, whose Minister of Foreign Af- fairs represents a party open to Ukraine eventually joining the EU; improve bilateral relations with some of the more Ukraine-skeptic member states, and consider replacing Ukraine’s ambassadors in these countries with more creative diplomats; become a leader within the Eastern Partnership; create a Ministry for European Integration under the First Deputy Premier, or combine the posts of Minister of Foreign Affairs and First Deputy Pre- mier; conclude negotiations on the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. The document should specifically lay out the Ukraine’s prospects for member- ship and for the institution of a visa-free regime after completion of the rel- evant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1993, No.23
    www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • Ukraine's search for security by Dr. Roman Solchanyk — page 2. • Chornobyl victim needs bone marrow transplant ~ page 4 • Teaching English in Ukraine program is under way - page 1 1 Publishfd by the Ukrainian National Association inc., a fraternal non-prof it association rainianWee Vol. LXI No. 23 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JUNE 6, 1993 50 cents New York commemorates Tensions mount over Black Sea Fleet by Marta Kolomayets Sea Fleet until 1995. 60th anniversary of Famine Kyyiv Press Bureau More than half the fleet — 203 ships — has raised the ensign of St. Andrew, by Andrij Wynnyckyj inaccurate reports carried in the press," KYYIV — Ukrainian President the flag of the Russian Imperial Navy. ranging from those of New York Times Leonid Kravchuk has asked for a summit NEW YORK — On June 1, the New None of the fleet's Warships, however, reporter Walter Duranty written in the meeting with Russian leader Boris have raised the ensign. On Friday, May York area's Ukrainian Americans com­ 1930s, to recent Soviet denials and Yeltsin to try to resolve mounting ten­ memorated the 60th anniversary of the Western attempts to smear famine sions surrounding control of the Black (Continued on page 13) tragic Soviet-induced famine of І932- researchers. Sea Fleet. 1933 with a "Day of Remembrance," "Now the facts are on the table," Mr. In response, Russian Foreign Minister consisting of an afternoon symposium Oilman said. "The archives have been Andrei Kozyrev is scheduled to arrive in Parliament begins held at the Ukrainian Institute of opened in Moscow and in Kyyiv, and the Ukraine on Friday morning, June 4, to America, and an evening requiem for the Ukrainian Holocaust has been revealed arrange the meeting between the two debate on START victims held at St.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Alberta the European Union's Migration Co
    University of Alberta The European Union's Migration Co-operation with Its Eastern Neighbours: The Art of EU Governance beyond its Borders by Lyubov Zhyznomirska A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science ©Lyubov Zhyznomirska Spring 2013 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. ABSTRACT The dissertation explores the European Union’s (EU) migration relations with Ukraine and Russia since the break-up of the Soviet Union, up until 2011. Utilizing a comparative research design and discursive analytical approach, it critically examines the external dimension of the EU’s immigration policies in order to understand how the EU’s “migration diplomacy” affects the cooperating countries’ politics and policies on migration. The research evaluates the EU’s impact by analyzing the EU-Ukraine and EU-Russia co-operation on irregular migration and the mobility of their citizens through the prism of the domestic discourses and policies on international migration.
    [Show full text]
  • I États Membres Member States
    I États membres Member States AFGHANISTAN Délégués / Delegates : S.Exc. Dr Assadullah Hanif Balkhi Ministre de l'Education nationale Chef de la délégation S.Exc. Dr Farida Momand Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur S.Exc. Mme Delbar Nazari Ministre de la Condition féminine Mme Sayeda Mojgan Mostafavi Vice-ministre de la Culture et de l'Information, en charge des publications Mme Khadija Amiri Chargée d'Affaires a.i., Deuxième secrétaire Délégation permanente auprès de l'UNESCO Chef adjointe de la délégation Suppléants / Alternates : M. Mohammad Shakir Habibyar Secrétaire général a.i. Commission nationale pour l’UNESCO Mme Shahlla Arifi Chef de la séction de l'enseignement Ministère de la Condition féminine M. Khesraw Omid Farooq Conseiller Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur Mme Qudsia Afif Habib Troisième secrétaire Délégation permanente auprès de l'UNESCO M. Tamim Malek-Asghar Secrétaire du chef Délégation permanente auprès de l'UNESCO et de l'ISESCO Conseillers / Advisers : M. Aliullah Amiri Secrétaire du Ministre Ministère de l'Education nationale M. Mohammad Samim Safi Assistant de la Ministre Ministère de la Condition féminine M. Abdul Rahman Wardak Chargé d'affaires bilatérales en France Ambassade en France AFRIQUE DU SUD / SOUTH AFRICA Délégués / Delegates : H.E. Ms Angelina Motshekga Minister of Basic Education Head of Delegation Mr Mohamed Enver Surty Deputy Minister of Basic Education Deputy Head of Delegation H.E. Mr Rapulane Sidney Molekane Ambassador to France Ambassador, Permanent Delegate to UNESCO Ms Nthabiseng Malefane
    [Show full text]
  • HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University
    HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES EDITOR Lubomyr Hajda, Harvard University EDITORIAL BOARD Michael S. Flier, George G. Grabowicz, Edward L. Keenan, and Roman Szporluk, Harvard University; Frank E. Sysyn, University of Alberta FOUNDING EDITORS Omeljan Pritsak and Ihor Sevcenko, Harvard University BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Larry Wolff EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Daría Yurchuk DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS Robert A. DeLossa ADVISORY BOARD Zvi Ankori, Tel Aviv University—John A. Armstrong, University of Wisconsin—Yaroslav Bilinsky, University of Delaware—Bohdan R. Bociurkiw, Carleton University, Ottawa—Axinia Djurova, University of Sofia—Olexa Horbatsch, University of Frankfurt—Halil inalcık, University of Chi- cago—Jaroslav D. Isajevych, Institute of Ukrainian Studies, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, L'viv— Edward Kasinec, New York Public Library—Magdalena László-Kujiuk, University of Bucharest— Walter Leitsch, University of Vienna—L. R. Lewitter, Cambridge University—G. Luciani, University of Bordeaux—George S. N. Luckyj, University of Toronto—M. Łesiów, Marie Curie-Sktodowska University, Lublin—Paul R. Magocsi, University of Toronto—Dimitri Obolensky, Oxford Univer- sity—RiccardoPicchio, Yale University—MarcRaeff, Columbia University—HansRothe, University of Bonn—Bohdan Rubchak, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle—Władysław A. Serczyk, University of Warsaw at Białystok—George Y. Shevelov, Columbia University—Günther Stökl, University of Cologne—A. de Vincenz, University of Göttingen—Vaclav Żidlicky, Charles Univer- sity, Prague. COMMITTEE ON UKRAINIAN STUDIES, Harvard University Stanisław Barańczak Patricia Chaput Timothy Colton Michael S. Flier George G. Grabowicz Edward L. Keenan Jeffrey D. Sachs Roman Szporluk (Chairman) Subscription rates per volume (two double issues) are $28.00 U.S. in the United States and Canada, $32.00 in other countries. The price of one double issue is $ 18.00 ($20.00 overseas).
    [Show full text]
  • Politicians Comment on Ukraine's Achievements Over the Past Decade
    INSIDE:• Ukraine’s steps“TEN to independence: YEARS OFa timeline INDEPENDENT — page 7 UKRAINE” • Academic and professional perspective: an interview — page 8 • Kyiv students perspective — page 6 Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXIX HE KRAINIANNo. 34 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, AUGUST 26, 2001 EEKLY$1/$2 in Ukraine PoliticiansT commentU on Ukraine’s Third UkrainianW World Forum held in Kyiv achievements over the past decade Criticizes Kuchma, produces little progress by Roman Woronowycz obvious one. We believed the question by Roman Woronowycz Ukrainian government to develop a policy Kyiv Press Bureau was still worth asking because it gave us Kyiv Press Bureau of immigration and reintegration of the an insight into how the political leaders diaspora into Ukrainian society and the KYIV – If you asked well over a view that which has transpired over the KYIV – The Third World Forum of lack of cohesiveness and cooperation dozen politicians what they think is the last decade in this country. Ukrainians opened on August 18 with among the legislative and executive greatest achievement of 10 years of The Ukrainian politicians that The much pomp, high expectations and calls branches of power in Ukraine. Ukrainian independence, you would Weekly questioned come from various for consolidation of the Ukrainian nation The resolution blames the failure to think the replies would be varied, accent- points on the Ukrainian political horizon on the eve of the 10th anniversary celebra- complete democratic and economic ing various nuances in the political, eco- and have either been near the top of the tion of the country’s independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Reichskommissariat Ukraine from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Reichskommissariat Ukraine From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia During World War II, Reichskommissariat Ukraine (abbreviated as RKU), was the civilian Navigation occupation regime of much of German-occupied Ukraine (which included adjacent areas of Reichskommissariat Ukraine Main page modern Belarus and pre-war Poland). Between September 1941 and March 1944, the Reichskommissariat of Germany Contents Reichskommissariat was administered by Reichskommissar Erich Koch. The ← → Featured content administration's tasks included the pacification of the region and the exploitation, for 1941–1944 Current events German benefit, of its resources and people. Adolf Hitler issued a Führer Decree defining Random article the administration of the newly occupied Eastern territories on 17 July 1941.[1] Donate to Wikipedia Before the German invasion, Ukraine was a constituent republic of the USSR, inhabited by Ukrainians with Russian, Polish, Jewish, Belarusian, German, Roma and Crimean Tatar Interaction minorities. It was a key subject of Nazi planning for the post-war expansion of the German Flag Emblem state and civilization. Help About Wikipedia Contents Community portal 1 History Recent changes 2 Geography Contact Wikipedia 3 Administration 3.1 Political figures related with the German administration of Ukraine Toolbox 3.2 Military commanders linked with the German administration of Ukraine 3.3 Administrative divisions What links here 3.3.1 Further eastward expansion Capital Rowno (Rivne) Related changes 4 Demographics Upload file Languages German (official) 5 Security Ukrainian Special pages 6 Economic exploitation Polish · Crimean Tatar Permanent link 7 German intentions Government Civil administration Page information 8 See also Reichskommissar Data item 9 References - 1941–1944 Erich Koch Cite this page 10 Further reading Historical era World War II 11 External links - Established 1941 Print/export - Disestablished 1944 [edit] Create a book History Download as PDF Population This section requires expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annals of UVAN, Vol. IV-V, Summer-Fall
    EDITORIAL COMMITTEE DM ITRY ČIŽEVSKY Haward University OLEKSANDER GRANOVSKY University of Minnesota ROMAN SMAL STOCKI Marquette University VOLODYMYR P. TIMOSHENKO Stanford University EDITOR MICHAEL VETUKHIV Columbia University TECHNICAL EDITOR HENRY M. NEBEL, J r. The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. are published quarterly by the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U.S., Inc. A Special issue will take place of 2 issues. All correspondence, orders, and remittances should be sent to The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. 11 У- West 26th Street, New York 10, N. Y. PRICE OF THIS ISSUE: $5.00 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICE: J6.00 A special rate is offered to libraries and graduate and undergraduate students in the fields of Slavic studies. Copyright 1955, by the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the U.S., Inc. THE ANNALS of the UKRAINIAN ACADEMY of Arts and Sciences in the U. S. Vol. IV-V Sum m er-Fall, 1955 No. 4 (14)-1 (15) Special Issue THE SETTLEMENT OF THE SOUTHERN UKRAINE (1750-1775) N. D. Polons’ka -Vasylenko Published by THE UKRAINIAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IN T H E U.S., Inc. New York 1955 THE ANNALS OF THE UKRAINIAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IN THE U. S., INC. S p e c i a l I s s u e CONTENTS page Introduction .................................................................................. 1 P a r t O n e COLONIZATION OF NOVA SERBIYA AND SLAVYAN OSERBIYA I. The Return of the Zaporozhians to their “Free Lands” .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Cause
    Political Culture and National Identity in Russian-Ukrainian Relations Eastern European Studies Stjepan Mestrovic= ,; General Editor Series Editorial Board Norman Cigar Bronislaw Misztal Sabrina Ramet Vladimir Shlapentokh Keith Tester Political Culture and National Identity in Russian-Ukrainian Relations . Texas A&M University Press College Station Copyright © by Mikhail A. Molchanov Manufactured in the United States of America All rights reserved First edition The paper used in this book meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, .-. Binding materials have been chosen for durability. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Molchanov, Mikhail A., – Political culture and national identity in Russian-Ukrainian relations / Mikhail A. Molchanov. — st ed. p. cm. — (Eastern European studies ; no. ) Includes bibliographical references and index. ––– (alk. paper) . Ukraine—Foreign relations —Russia (Federation) . Russia (Federation)—Foreign relations—Ukraine. Ukraine—Foreign relations—– . Nationalism—Ukraine. Nationalism—Russia (Federation). Title. Eastern European studies (College Station, Tex) ; no. .—dc To the memory of my father, Aleksandr Prokofievich Molchanov (1922–1975) Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Political Culture and Nationality in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies A History of an Uneasy Relationship Ukraine’s Departure and the Crisis of Russian Identity Russian Political Culture: Recurrence and Reformulation Political Culture and Nationality in Ukraine Ukraine’s Russian Problem Fears and Hopes: Ukraine, Russia, and the West Conclusion Notes Bibliography Index Acknowledgments This book was started as a Ph.D. dissertation in the University of Alberta’s Department of Political Science. I am grateful to all of my colleagues in the department who were the first readers of the original proposal and disserta- tion draft and to the university for two years of scholarship support and an additional year of lecturing.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Political Parties and Leadership
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: EMANCIPATION FROM DOUBLETHINK? POST- SOVIET POLITICAL PARTIES AND LEADERSHIP Peter Voitsekhovsky, Doctor of Philosophy, 2013 Dissertation directed by: Professor Vladimir Tismaneanu Department of Government and Politics This study examines the phenomenon of doublethink as a core feature of the “mental software” that continues to define the character of post-Soviet societies. It is revealed in patterns of prevarication and equivocation that characterize the thinking and behavior of both the elites and the masses. Doublethink is also manifested in incongruous values and duplicitous rules that prevail in society. It accounts for the perpetuation of simulative and fake institutions of “façade democracy.” Political parties in post-Soviet Ukraine are analyzed as a major example of simulative and imitative institutions. Here, traditional ideology-based party taxonomies prove misleading. Political parties are quasi-virtual entities with the character of “post- Orwellian political machines”: they operate in a topsy-turvy world of imitated supply and deluded demand. The study employs three levels of analysis: macro (surveys data and “Tocquevillean” observations); meso (biographical data and political discourse analysis); and micro (in-depth interviews). EMANCIPATION FROM DOUBLETHINK? POST-SOVIET POLITICAL PARTIES AND LEADERSHIP Peter Voitsekhovsky Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENTIFIC YEARBOOK Issue Twelve
    SCIENTIFIC YEARBOOK Issue Twelve Compilers Leonid Guberskiy, Pavlo Kryvonos, Borys Gumenyuk, Anatoliy Denysenko, Vasyl Turkevych Kyiv • 2011 ББК 66.49(4УКР)я5+63.3(4УКР)Оя5 UKRAYINA DYPLOMATYCHNA (Diplomatic Ukraine) SCIENTIFIC AN NUALLY Issued since November 2000 THE TWELFTH ISSUE Founders: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Diplomatic Academy at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine General Directorate for Servicing Foreign Representations Historical Club Planeta The issue is recommended for publishing by the Scientific Council of the Diplomatic Academyat the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, Protocol No of September 28, 2011 р. Publisher: General Directorate for Servicing Foreign Representations Chief Editor Anatoliy Denysenko, PhD (history) Deputy chief editors: Borys Humenyuk, Doctor of History, Vasyl Turkevych, Honored Art Worker of Ukraine Leonid Schlyar, Doctor of Political Sciences Executive editor: Volodymyr Denysenko, Doctor of History ISBN 966-7522-07-5 EDITORIAL BOARD Kostyantyn Gryschenko, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Leonid Guberskiy, Rector of the T.G. Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Member of the NAS of Ukraine, Doctor of Philosophy Borys Humenyuk, Rector of the Diplomatic Academy of Ukraine under the MFA of Ukraine, Deputy Chief Editor Volodymyr Khandogiy, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Ukraine to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Volodymyr Yalovyi, Deputy Head of the VR Staff of Ukraine Oleh Bilorus, Head of the VR Committee of Ukraine for Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Party System Evolution: 1990-2017
    RAZUMKOV CENTRE UKRAINE’S PARTY SYSTEM EVOLUTION: 1990-2017 The publication is supported by the Ukrainian Office of Konrad Adenauer Foundation 2017 UKRAINE`S PARTY SYSTEM EVOLUTION: 1990-2017 / Edited by Yu.Yakymenko. – Kyiv: Razumkov Сentre, 2017. – p.62 This publication presents an abridged version of the Analytical Report by the Razumkov Centre that examines the emergence and further transformation of Ukraine’s party system in 1990-2017. We have examined key drivers of change at each evolution stage, such as legislation on political parties and elections; political regime; most significant societal cleavages, nature and consequences of their influence; analysed current trends in Ukraine’s party system development. The publication will be useful for everyone interested in post-independence nation-building processes in Ukraine, development of political parties and the party system, experience of political transformations in post-Soviet countries. © Razumkov Centre, 2017 © “Zapovit Publishing House”, 2017 UKRAINE’S PARTY SYSTEM EVOLUTION: 1990-2017 olitical parties are an important institution of a democratic society, P which ensures aggregation and articulation of the interests of various social groups. Interaction among parties in their struggle for power and the exercise of political power by them form a party system. The process of party system formation in Ukraine has been going on for more than 25 years. This publication represents a shortened version of the Razumkov Centre’s report, which examines the fundamental stages of the party system formation in 1990-2017, including intra-party processes, institutional legal and socio-political conditions for their activities and inter-party relations.1 1. STUDY METHODOLOGY The Razumkov Centre’s study uses an approach that combines elements of quantitative and qualitative approaches to the analysis of party system dynamics and takes into account changes of the three following components that define party system and/or affect it.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyiv, Ukraine: the City of Domes and Demons from the Collapse Of
    Roman Adrian Roman Cybriwsky Kyiv, Ukraine is a pioneering case study of urban change from socialism to the hard edge of a market economy after the Soviet collapse. It looks in detail at the changing social geography of the city, and on critical problems such as corruption, social inequality, sex tourism, and destruction of historical ambience by greedy developers. The book is based on fieldwork and an insider’s knowledge of the city, and is engagingly written. Roman Adrian Cybriwsky is Professor of Geography and Urban Studies at Temple University in Philadelphia, USA, and former Ukraine Kyiv, Fulbright Scholar at the National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy. He divides his time between Philadelphia, Kyiv, and Tokyo, about which he has also written books. “Roman Cybriwsky knows this city and its people, speaks their language, feels their frustrations with its opportunist and corrupt post-Soviet public figures Roman Adrian Cybriwsky who have bankrupted this land morally and economically. He has produced a rich urban ethnography stoked by embers of authorial rage.” — John Charles Western, Professor of Geography, Syracuse University, USA “Kyiv, Ukraine is an interdisciplinary tour de force: a scholarly book that is Kyiv, Ukraine also an anthropological and sociological study of Kyivites, a guide to Kyiv and its society, politics, and culture, and a journalistic investigation of the city’s darkest secrets. At this time of crisis in Ukraine, the book is indispensable.” — Alexander Motyl, Professor of Political Science, Rutgers University, USA The City of Domes and Demons “Filled with personal observations by a highly trained and intelligent urbanist, Kyiv, Ukraine is a beautiful and powerful work that reveals from the Collapse of Socialism profound truths about a city we all need to know better.” — Blair A.
    [Show full text]