DOCSLIB.ORG

Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-64542-0 — Caria and Crete in Antiquity Naomi Carless Unwin Index More Information 258 259

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-64542-0 — Caria and Crete in Antiquity Naomi Carless Unwin Index More Information 258 259 Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-64542-0 — Caria and Crete in Antiquity Naomi Carless Unwin Index More Information 258 259 Index Abu Simbel, 36 Antoninus Liberalis, 66 , 67 Achaemenid Empire, 32 , 46 Apasa, 113 , 115 Aegean islands, 1 , 3 , 4 , 10 , 13 , 29 , 57 Aphrodisias, 8n. 36 , 22n. 107 , 33n. 7 , 46 , 54 , Aelian, 21 , 29 , 91n. 4 57n. 147 , 82 , 82n. 163 , 201n. 54 , 210 Aeschylus, 71 basilica reliefs, 54n. 133 , 56 , 57n. 147 , Ahhiyawa , 98n. 50 , 112 , 118 , 119 70n. 81 , 97 , 176 Aitolia, 81 , 81n. 155 , 150n. 134 , 159n. 198 , Aphrodite, 22n. 107 , 78 163n. 225 , 195 Aphrodite Schoinitis, 173 Aitolian League, 161 Apollo, 6n. 27 , 66 , 67 , 121 , 122 , 122n. 202 , Akakallis, 6n. 27 , 67 122n. 206 , 161 , 163 , 170 , 172n. 27 , 180 , Alabanda, 50 , 50n. 109 , 53n. 126 , 54 , 54n. 135 , 186 , 190 , 241 125n. 8 , 133 , 138n. 68 , 182n. 73 , 210 and Artemis, 65 , 82 , 161 , 200 Alaksandu treaty, 115 Apollo Delphinios, 121 Alexander the Great, 10n. 41 , 33 , 52n. 119 , 96 , Apollo Didymeus, 178n. 61 134 , 134n. 44 , 137 , 157 , 170 , 194 , 194n. Ptoan Apollo, 45 30 , 205n. 89 Apollodorus of Athens, 37 , 37n. 32 Iskander, 96 Apollonius of Aphrodisias, 33 Alexandria, 13 , 13n. 67 , 14n. 70 , 96 , 125n. 8 , Apollonius Rhodius, 68 , 172n. 21 160n. 204 Appian, 22n. 107 Alinda, 50 , 54 , 54n. 135 Appius Claudius, 142 , 142n. 95 Amasis, 35 – 36 Aptera, 133 , 133n. 39 , 152n. 146 Amazons, 17 , 22 , 22n. 107 , 80n. 146 Ariadne, 74 , 174 , 174n. 40 Amyzon, 54 , 56 , 155 , 155n. 176 , 189 – 190 , 192 , Aristophanes, 37 , 49n. 107 193 , 194 , 196 , 212 Aristotle, 76 , 191n. 11 , 194 , 194n. 28 , Zeus Kretagenetas. See Zeus Kretagenetas 208n. 101 and Diktynna Arkades, 150 , 150n. 138 , 152n. 146 , 152n. 147 , Anax, 67n. 53 , 84n. 176 , 91 162n. 219 Anineta, 97 Arnuwanda, 116 Anthes, 59 , 60 , 174 Arsinoë, 13n. 67 Antigonid kingdom, 15 , 133 , 206 Artemis, 82 , 161 , 172n. 27 , 200 Antigonos Doson, 15n. 77 , 135n. 47 , 157n. Artemis Ephesia, 118n. 183 193 , 161 Artemis Leukophryene, 80 , 80n. 145 , Antigonos Monophthalmos, 197 80n. 146 , 178 Antioch, 134 , 194n. 30 Artemisia Antiochos II, 15n. 76 Persian Wars, 14 Antiochos III, 56 , 133 , 162 , 178n. 59 , 190 , 193 , sister/ wife of Maussollos, 14 , 59 , 125 , 195 , 196 , 206 , 207 148n. 127 alliance with Euromos, 146 , 190 – 192 , 199 Arzawa, 20 , 112 – 115 , 113n. 143 , 116 alliance with Philip V, 158n. 196 Asandros, 11n. 48 , 205n. 89 at Amyzon, 155n. 176 , 190 , 194 , 196 , Asklepios, 161 199 – 200 Assuwa, 113 , 113n. 144 , 115n. 163 , 118 , at Teos, 150n. 134 118n. 181 defeat at Apameia, 183 Assyria, 20n. 98 , 57 , 97 , 97n. 42 ruler cult, 200n. 53 contacts with Anatolia, 97 Antiochos the son, 190 , 196 Ninos and Semiramis, 97n. 42 , 174 , 175n. 44 258 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-64542-0 — Caria and Crete in Antiquity Naomi Carless Unwin Index More Information 259 Index 259 Asterios, 67n. 53 , 91 , 91n. 1 Chalketor, 157n. 192 , 206n. 97 asylia , 138 , 138n. 74 , 140 , 158 , 158n. 195 Chersonesos, 10n. 48 , 155 , 212 Teian asylia . See Teos: Cretan grants of Cretan Chersonesos, 152n. 153 asylia Chios, 10 , 38n. 35 , 83 , 119 Atabyrion, Mount, 11 , 80 Chrysaor, 53 – 54 , 161 , 162 ateleia, 131 , 132 , 152 and Bellerophon, 70 , 71 Athena, 171 , 173 , 204n. 79 and Pegasos, 53 , 70 , 70n. 81 , 210 Athenian tribute lists, 32 place name Chrysaoris, 54 Athens, 66 , 70n. 74 , 91 , 95 , 163 , 174 , 202n. 64 , Chrysaoric League, 82n. 162 , 162 , 162n. 216 202n. 68 Cilicia, 12 , 13n. 67 , 97 , 115 cult of Bendis. See Bendis at Athens Çine Tepecik, 110 cult of Zeus Labraundos, 201 Cretan- born Zeus. See Zeus Kretagenes/ Attalid kingdom, 15 , 15n. 76 , 133 , 163n. 225 , Kretagenetas 182n. 74 , 204n. 79 Crete Attalos I, 133n. 38 , 135n. 47 , 178n. 59 Cretan koinon , 15 , 133n. 38 , 141 – 142 , 149 , autochthony , 6 , 29 , 29n. 141 , 66 , 67n. 49 , 69 , 209 159 , 165 , 178 – 180 , 181 Cretan mercenaries. See mercenaries Badakhshan, 96 First Cretan War, 142 , 154n. 162 , barbarophōnoi, 34 , 42 , See Strabo: discussion 154n. 164 , 159 of barbarophōnoi insularity, 11 Bargylia, 54 , 54n. 135 , 86n. 196 , 156 Second Cretan War, 141n. 86 Basileus, cult of, 83 – 84 strategic importance, 15 , 158 Basileus Kaunios, 84 Venetian Candia, 16 , 16n. 82 Zeus Basileus, 84 Ctesias of Knidos, 97 Battle of Raphia, 133 cultural agency, 23 , 89 , 165 , 189 , 200 , 205 , Battos, 121n. 197 , 170 207 , 212 Bellerophon, 70 , 71 , 71n. 83 , 71n. 85 , 78 , 79 soldiers as cultural agents, 202 – 207 and Pegasos. See Pegasos cultural interface, 1 , 27 , 28 , 117 Bendis at Athens, 201 – 202 ‘Lower Interface’, 104 , 112 , 117 Biannos, 152n. 146 East Aegean/ West Anatolian bilingualism, 45 , 48n. 97 , 49 interface, 27 Black Sea, 8 , 8n. 37 , 154 Cyclades, 4n. 10 , 7 , 10n. 43 , 73 , Bodrum peninsula, 8 101n. 72 , 107n. 98 Bronze Age Mycenaean infl uence, 110 Cyprus, 12 , 15n. 80 , 41n. 56 , 202 , 203 Boiotia, 121 Cyrene, 13 , 14n. 70 Boiotians in Th essaly, 77n. 128 foundation myth, 121 , 121n. 197 , 176 Borsippa, Babylonia, 8 , 8n. 35 Bottiaia, 194 – 195 Daktyli, 84 , 84n. 184 , 85n. 185 Byblis Darrōn , 205 and Kaunos myth, 68 Datça peninsula, 8 spring/ fountain, 68 , 69 Delos, 7 , 122n. 206 , 132 Delphi, 75 , 77 , 77n. 128 , 121n. 197 , 150n. 134 , Callimachus, 44n. 76 , 122n. 206 , 160 , 165 , 170 , 178 , 194n. 28 160n. 204 , 175 , 175n. 48 Delphic Amphiktiony, 150 Caria foundation myth, 120 , 122 Carian identity, 1 , 2 , 46 , 49 , 51 – 56 , Delphinion, 122n. 202 58 – 60 , 212 Dexippos, Koan doctor, 136 Carian koinon , 51 – 53 Diadochi, 134 geographical region, 32–33 dialects, 46n. 91 Kar, 6 , 7 , 29 , 34 , 79 Didyma, 84 , 85 , 92n. 9 Carian language, 1 – 2 , 41 , 46 , 49 Diktynna alphabet, 2 , 2n. 3 , 70n. 79 Diktynnaistai, 204 – 205 graffi ti, 40n. 49 Zeus Kretagenetas and Diktynna. See Zeus karizein . See karizein Kretagenetas and Diktynna linguistic acculturation in Caria, 48 , 49 , 51 Diodorus Siculus, 6 , 6n. 24 , 7 , 52n. 119 , 61 , Çeşme- Bağlararası, 109 67n. 53 , 71 , 73 , 81 , 93n. 16 , 97 , 159 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-64542-0 — Caria and Crete in Antiquity Naomi Carless Unwin Index More Information 260 261 260 Index Dodekanese, 7 , 8 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 28 , 110 , 117 Gaulites, Kara diglōsson, 45 ‘Lower Interface’. See cultural interface Gauls, 135n. 47 , 148n. 122 , 165 , 170 network ‘cluster’, 10n. 45 Glaukos, 53n. 130 , 54 , 78 , 79 , 161 Dodona, 78n. 128 Gordiouteichos, 8n. 36 Dorian foundations, 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 53 Gordis, 57n. 147 , Dorian migration, 4 , 66 , 94 , 95 Gortyn, 77 , 136n. 58 , 141 , 142 , 142n. 95 , Hexapolis, 59 147n. 121 , 152n. 151 , 182 , 185n. 86 , 203 double axe symbol, 16 – 25 Greek koine , 49 , 49n. 102 , 59 Dreros, 122 , 122n. 202 , 152n. 153 , 191n. 10 , Gyges, 17 207n. 99 Dyme, 135 Halbwachs, M., 63 collective memory, 63 , 64 East Aegean Koine, 104 , 108 , 112 Halikarnassos, 14 , 50 , 50n. 112 , 53 , 53n. 126 , Egypt, 6n. 25 , 12 , 14 , 24 , 45 , 78n. 128 , 54 , 57 , 119 , 136 , 136n. 58 , 201n. 54 , 210 121n. 196 , 134 , 154 , 155 , 162 civic history recounted in the Salmakis Carian presence in Egypt, 8n. 35 , 36 , 136 , inscription. See Salmakis 201 , 201n. 59 Dorian identity, 38 , 40 , 59 , 59n. 161 , Eleutherna, 15n. 77 , 152n. 153 , 162n. 219 59n. 165 Endymion, 6 , 6n. 27 , 60 , 60n. 166 , 81n. 155 , Hekatomnid capital, 57 , 59 , 138 , 156 171 – 173 , 174 mixed population, 38 , 59 , 59n. 163 Ephesos, 13 , 21 , 22n. 107 , 38n. 35 , 48n. 97 , 60 , 65 , peninsula. See Bodrum peninsula 79 , 84 , 92n. 8 , 97 , 110 , 115 , 135 , 172n. 27 Hatti, 113 , 116 , 116n. 168 , 117n. 175 birth of Apollo and Artemis. See Ortygia Hattuša, 20 , 112 , 113n. 144 , 118n. 178 kouretes, 82 , 83 Hattusili I, 113 Ephorus, 8 , 45 , 45n. 81 , 66 , 66n. 44 , 81n. 155 , Hattusili III, 116n. 171 160n. 205 , 208n. 101 Hecataeus, 63 Epidamnos, 165 , 203n. 78 Hekatomnid dynasty, 10 , 33 , 46 , 46n. 88 , 59 , epigraphy 125 , 135 , 138 , 154 archives, 170 , 177 – 178 , 182n. 77 basileis , 52 dating by letter forms, 146 , 157n. 192 , Hekatomnos, 50 , 59 172n. 20 , 175 , 192 , 192n. 17 Herakleia- under- Latmos, 10n. 48 , 171 – 173 , historical inscriptions, 77 – 78 176 , 183 , 201n. 54 Eranna, 152n. 146 dispute with Euromos, 171 , 171n. 20 , 193 Erythrai, 38n. 35 , 48n. 97 , 74 , 84 , 85 , 85n. 187 Endymion myth. See Endymion Erythros myth, 74 isopoliteia treaty with Miletos. See treaties etesians, 12 Herakles, 17 Eumenes II, 133n. 38 , 142 Heraklaidai, 195 , 195n. 34 Euripides, 36 , 87 Hermesianax of Kolophon, 181 Euromos, 45 , 125 , 155 , 157n. 192 , 189 , 193 , Hermias, Koan doctor, 136 197n. 45 Hermione, 135 constitutional reforms, 190 – 192 , 197 , 199 Hermos River, 113 cult of ‘Cretan- born’ Zeus. See Zeus Herodoros of Herakleia, 66 Kretagenes/ Zeus Kretagenetas Herodotus, 6n. 25 , 21 , 24n. 113 , 45 , 49 , dispute with Herakleia, 171 , 172n. 20 , 192 51n. 118 , 52n. 122 , 61 , 62 , 93 , 94n. 23 , epigraphy, 145 , 146 207n. 101 renamed as the Philippeis, 191 , 197 , 199 Artemisia of Halikarnassos, 14 Europa, 5 , 5n. 20 , 67n. 53 , 70 , 71 employment of mercenaries in Egypt, Evans, A. J., 21 , 24 , 104 34 – 36 , 45 family, 40 , 40n. 51 foundation mythologies, 63 , 119 – 120 foundation of Cyrene, 121 migration narratives, 4 , 6 , 66 foundation of Miletos, 39 , 40 , 67 Ionian migration, 38 garrisons, 45 , 133 , 155 , 191 , 197 , 199 , 203 , Isagoras’ family, 202n. 68 203n. 77 , 204n. 79 , 206 on Caria, 2 , 5 , 7n. 28 , 48 , 51–52, 57 , Ptolemaic garrison at Itanos, 14 , 69 , 209 203n. 78 on Crete, 5n. 19 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-316-64542-0 — Caria and Crete in Antiquity Naomi Carless Unwin Index More Information 261 Index 261 on Halikarnassos, 59n.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • İDOL-111.Pdf
    Sunuþ Çevreden Çýkarak arihsel çevre, doðal çevre, kentsel çevre olarak tanýmlanan ve yeni bir davranýþ Tkavramýný gündeme getiren çevre sözcüðü, evrenimizde insan oðlunun yerleþik düzene geçtiði Neolitik çaðdan bu yana bilinen bir sözcüktür. Zamanýmýzda ileri uygar- lýk düzeyini yakalamýþ zengin ülkeler, II. Dünya savaþýndan sonra çevre kavramýný çeþitli boyutlarý ile tartýþmýþlar ve gerekli koruyucu önlemlerini almýþlardýr. Ülkemizdeki Çevre kavramýna dönecek olursak, bu sözcüðün ve önüne gelen sýfatlarýn ancak çeyrek yüzyýllýk bir geçmiþi olduðunu görürüz. Bugün için çevre kavramýnýn içeriði hala çok kolay bir biçimde tarif edilir. Ancak tanýmýn ayrýntýsýna girildikçe, olayýn hiçte o kadar kolay açýklanamadýðý görülür. Biz arkeologlar için birinci derecede tarihsel çevre kavra- mý önem taþýr. Çünkü tarihsel çevremizin yaþamýmýzda bize vereceði dersleri, tercihleri ve davranýþ biçimlerimizi akýlcý bir yöntemle belirlememize olanak verir. Bu oluþumda dikkat edilecek olan ilkler arasýnda somut ve soyut kültür varlýklarýmýzý en iyi bir biçimde koruma bilincinin küçük yaþlardan itibaren toplumumuza verilmesi, saðlýklý bilgilerle uluslarýn kendi özgün kültürleri olabileceðini ve bunlar içinde korunmasý gerekli olan taþýnýr ve taþýnmaz kültür varlýklarýnýn da olabileceðini komplekslerden arýnarak öðret- memiz, bir yurttaþlýk görevi olmalýdýr. Bu öðreti o ülkenin kültürel yaþam kalitesini ortaya koymada en büyük etmendir. Kültürel yaþamýn oluþmasýnda geçmiþin ne denli önemli olduðunu görmemek bizce onarýlmasý olanaksýz bir yanýlgýdýr. Ülkemizde son çeyrek yüzyýlda geniþ halk kitlelerince kabul gören bu yeni taným, geçmiþimizin geleceðe ne kadar etkin olduðunu az da olsa öðretme becerisini yakalayabilmiþtir. Ancak Türkiye'nin plansýz ve ileriye dönük kurgularýnýn yapýlmaksýzýn baþlatýlan sanayileþme dönemi, kültürel varlýklarýmýzýn bilinçsizce kýyýmýna sebep olabilmiþtir. Son günlerde (Aralýk 2001 ve Ocak 2002) ülkemiz medyasýnda ve TBMM. genel kurulunda tartýþýlan bir konu ile "Tarihsel Çevre" Türkiye gündemine oturmuþtur.
    [Show full text]
  • Tezi Yöneteu
    İSTAltBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ EDEBİYAT FAKÜTITESİ LİSA.liS TEZİ TEZİN KONUSU : STRABOlPUll XIV. KİTABilillA GEÇEli BÖLGE, KENT, TANRI, TAURIÇA VE ŞAHIS İSİMLERİ ÜZERİIIDE KISA AÇIKLAL'IALI TARAiliA. ÇALiı;MASI • TEZİ YÖNETEU : PROF. DR. ADUAN PEKmAN İSTANBUl/HAZİRAN 1982 NERİrı!AN ARSLAN 18809 İÇİNDEKİLER 1. ÖNSÖZ 2. BİDLİYOGRAFYA 3· STRABON'UN KİŞİLİGİ VE ESERLERİ 4. STRABOIPUN XIV. KİTABIIillA GEÇEN BÖLGE, KEUT, TANRI, TAHRIÇA VE ŞAHIS İSİMLERİ ÜZERİNDE KISA AÇIKLAMALI TABALlA ÇALişmASI ÖN SÖ Z Eskiçağın ünlü coğTafyacısı Strabon r un 17 lü taplık "Geographika" adlı bir eseri vardır. Strabon ayrıca tarih alanında da büyülc çalışmalar yapmış ve 47 cil·tlik bir tarih yazmıştır. Ancak bu eseri günümüze kadar ulaşa~amıştır. Strabon Coğrafya eserinde Eskiçağdwci Anadolu'nun sadece coğrafyası halekında değil tarihi haldtında da b~lgiler vermektedir. Eserinin çeşitli yerlerinde kendisinden ve atalarından bahsetmek­ tedir: Strabon hakkındaki bildiklerimizde eserinde bize naklettiği bilgi­ lerden ibaret·tir. A-taları Pontos kralları yanında önemli görevler almış olan kimselerdir. özellikle anne tarafından soylu bir aileye mensup olan Strabon m.ö. 64-63 yıllarında Pontos bölgesinde Aınaseia (Amasya) şehrinde doğmuştur. Varlıklı bir aileye mensup olduğu için iyi bir ÖbTenim yapabil­ miş ve istediği kadar seyahat edebilmiştir. Öğrenimini genç yaşta Karia'da (Tralles) yanında Nysa şehrinde Aristodemos'un yru1ında yapmıştır. H.ö. 44 yıllarında Roma'ya gitmiş ve orada da öğrenimine devam etmiştir. Onun hocaları arasında Stoic filozof tarihçi, büyük bilgin Poseidonios da vardır. Strabon'un kendisi de Stoic felsefenin ilkelerine bağlı bir filazoftur. Eserlerinde Roma Siyasetine ve siyasetçilerine bir hayranlılc gÇ;izlenılenmelctedir. Afrilca'nın ve Anadolu­ nun büyük bir kısmını dolaşan s·trabon hayatının son 26-27 yılını Amasia 1da geçirmiş tir.
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Kleinasiatischen Münzkunde Und Geschichte 11
    GEPHYRA 12, 2015, 1-88 Beiträge zur kleinasiatischen Münzkunde und Geschichte 11. Adleromina: Stadt- und Kultgründungen auf Geheiß des Zeus Johannes NOLLÉ «Stadtgründer müssen unbedingt mit der Art und Weise vertraut sein, wie die Dichter Mythen erzählen und von der diese, wenn sie sie dichten, nicht abweichen dürfen. Hingegen dürfen Stadt- gründer auf gar keinen Fall selbst Mythen dichten.»1 Platon Regula Kunkel gewidmet 1. Einführung Platon hat in seinem ‹Staat› von den Stadt- bzw. Staatsgründern gefordert, einen klaren Blick dafür zu haben, dass griechische Dichter genremäßig einer mythischen Weltsicht verpflichtet seien. Von den Gründern eines idealen Staates aber verlangt er, es ihnen nicht nachzutun und sich auf keinen Fall auf den Mythos einzulassen (sondern sich an den Realitäten zu orientieren). Tatsächlich haben die hellenischen Stadtgründer von der archaischen Zeit bis in den Hellenismus, soweit wir das be- urteilen können, sich meist mit wohlüberlegten und klaren Zielsetzungen zu einer Stadt- bzw. ‹Ko- lonie›gründung entschlossen, dann nach rationalen Gesichtspunkten geeignete Plätze für ihre Gründungen ausgewählt und schließlich die Städte gut geplant und klar durchdacht angelegt2 – * Prof. Dr. Johannes Nollé, Kommission für Alte Geschichte und Epigraphik des DAI, Amalienstr. 73b, D- 80799 München ([email protected]). Der Beitrag ist eine Fortsetzung von Gephyra 7, 2010 (2012), 71-126; über einige ausgewählte Aspekte dieser Thematik habe ich auf dem XV. Internationalen Numismatischen Kongress in Taormina im Septem-
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/07/2021 01:02:10PM Via Free Access 332 Chapter 6
    chapter 6 Building Urban Community on the Margins: Stratonikeia and the Sanctuary of Zeus at Panamara While Lagina was a local shrine that grew and expanded with Stratonikeia to become its religious center, the sanctuary of Zeus Karios at Panamara was already recognized as an important regional cult center in southern Karia.1 However, it, too, was gradually drawn into the orbit of Stratonikeia to become the next major urban sanctuary of the polis. This case study explores yet another kind of dynamic in the transition to polis sanctuary, one that entailed a major lateral shift in scope for Panamara, from the wider region of southern Karia with diverse communities towards the urban center in the north and its demographic base (Figure 6.1, and Figure 5.1 above). Through an examination of this transition it will become apparent how Stratonikeia came to replace, or absorb, the administering body of the sanctuary, but also how Panamara was used to achieve the same kinds of goals of the emerging polis as was Lagina: territorial integrity, social cohesion, and global recognition, albeit in a different way. Panamara and its environment have unfortunately not been subject to the same systematic archaeological investigations as Lagina, and much of the orig- inal landscape in the area has already been lost in the exploitation of lignite, or brown coal, through strip-mining. Our sources for this sanctuary and its envi- ronment are therefore severely limited, especially with regard to architecture and processional routes. Fortunately, however, the communities involved with the sanctuary at Panamara left hundreds of inscriptions behind that provide valuable insights into the way in which the sanctuary and cult of Zeus Karios were gradually realigned to meet the needs of Stratonikeia.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996
    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 12 | 1999 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 Angelos Chaniotis, Joannis Mylonopoulos and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/724 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.724 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 1999 Number of pages: 207-292 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, Joannis Mylonopoulos and Eftychia Stavrianopoulou, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 », Kernos [Online], 12 | 1999, Online since 13 April 2011, connection on 15 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/724 Kernos Kemos, 12 (1999), p. 207-292. Epigtoaphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 1996 (EBGR 1996) The ninth issue of the BEGR contains only part of the epigraphie harvest of 1996; unforeseen circumstances have prevented me and my collaborators from covering all the publications of 1996, but we hope to close the gaps next year. We have also made several additions to previous issues. In the past years the BEGR had often summarized publications which were not primarily of epigraphie nature, thus tending to expand into an unavoidably incomplete bibliography of Greek religion. From this issue on we return to the original scope of this bulletin, whieh is to provide information on new epigraphie finds, new interpretations of inscriptions, epigraphieal corpora, and studies based p;imarily on the epigraphie material. Only if we focus on these types of books and articles, will we be able to present the newpublications without delays and, hopefully, without too many omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]
  • Inloop Document Talanta 12-02-2015 20:46 Pagina 235
    pag 235-240:inloop document Talanta 12-02-2015 20:46 Pagina 235 TALANTA XLII - XLIII (2010-2011), 235-240 GEOGRAPHY OF SOUTHWEST ANATOLIA: NOTES TO GANDER 2010 A review article Fred C. Woudhuizen On the basis of consultation of Gander 2010, I have assembled the following list of identifications of place-names from cuneiform Hittite and Luwian hieroglyph - ic sources concerning the southwest corner of Anatolia. For the Hittite toponyms and river names, cf. del Monte /Tischler 1978 and del Monte 1992, for the classi - cal equivalents of the toponyms, cf. Zgusta 1984. Hittite/Luwian Lycian Greek I. Pamfuliav “Pamphylia” a. Kaštaraya Kestro~ “Kestros river” 1. Parḫa Perv gh “Perge” II. Lukka Tr ͂m mis- Lukiav “Lycia” 2. Kuwalapašša Kolv basa “Kolbasa” 3. Zumarri Zẽmure Livmura “Limyra” 4. Ḫinduwa Cãkbi Kanv duba “Kandyba” b. Šiyanta Xanv qo~ “Xanthos river” 5. Wiyanawanda Oinj oav nda “Oinoanda” 6. Talawa , Talwa Tlawa Tlw`~ “Tlōs” 7. Pina , Pinatí Pinale Pinv ara “Pinara” 8. Awarna Arñna “Arna , Xanv qo~ “Xanthos” 9. Patar Pttara Pavtara “Patara” III. Indus valley c. ḫapir utna ∆Indo~v “Indus river” 10. Luwata Loanda “Loanda” 11. Ḫwalatarna Xbide Kaun` o~ “Kaunos” IV. “Šeḫa river land” Kariav “Caria” d. Šeḫa Maiav ndro~ “Meander river” 12. Šallapa Salv bako~ “Salbacus Mons” 235 pag 235-240:inloop document Talanta 12-02-2015 20:46 Pagina 236 Hittite/Luwian Greek 13. Wallarimma ÔUllarv ima “Hyllarima” 14. Waliwanda ∆Alabv anda “Alabanda” e. Marsuav ~ “Marsyas river” 15. Appawiya , Aba[wiya] (land along the Marsyas river) 16. Iyalanda “Alinda “Alinda” 17. Atriya ∆Idria~v “Idrias” 18. Utima “Iduma “Idyma” 19.
    [Show full text]
  • Maxim M. KHOLOD1
    Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica 26(2): 199–211 On the Ionian League in the Fourth Century BC Maxim M. KHOLOD1 Abstract. The author argues that the revival of the Ionian League, most likely dissolved by the Persians right after 494, happened ca. 373 BC. The sLeague seems to have been refounded then as a purely religious association. Its life was very long this time: the League most probably did not cease to exist not only during the rest of the 4th century BC but it was the same one which functioned almost interruptedly throughout further several centuries and disappeared only at a moment after the mid-3rd century AD. Rezumat. Autorul susține că renașterea Ligii Ionice, cel mai probabil dizolvată de perși imediat după 494, s-a produs aprocimativ în 373 î.H. Liga pare să fi fost reîntemeiată atunci ca o asociație pur religioasă. Existența sa a fost foarte îndelungată: Liga nu numai că nu a încetat cel mai probabil să existe pe parcursul secolului al IV-lea î.Hr., ci a funcționat aproape neîntrerupt în secolele care au urmat și a dispărut imediat după mijlocul secolului al III-lea d.Hr. Keywords: Ionian League, Panionion, Panionia, Persian Empire, Alexander the Great. The evidence for the Ionian League (also named the Panionian League) in the Classical period, after the suppression of the Ionian revolt by the Persians in 4942, is scarce. It is absolutely absent for the rest of the 5th century, a fact speaking, in all likelihood, that the League did not exist at this time3. Furthermore, it is significant that Herodotus describing the Panionion, a sacred place of the Ionians at Mycale in the territory of Priene, writes about a festival of the Ionian League in honour of Heliconian Poseidon held at this place, the Panionia, as if it is no longer celebrated in his time (I, 148)4.
    [Show full text]
  • Olympichos and Mylasa: a New Inscription from the Temple of Zeus Osogō?*
    Habelt-Verlag · Bonn Epigraphica Anatolica 49 (2016) 1–26 OLYMPICHOS AND MYLASA: A NEW INSCRIPTION FROM THE TEMPLE OF ZEUS OSOGŌ?* Not all that long ago, a major new Olympichos inscription from Labraunda was published by Signe Isager and Lars Karlsson.1 Now, less than a decade later, two further ones can be added to this ever-growing dossier. One, from Labraunda itself, was found in 2014 during excavation work in one of the andrones (Andron A); it is published in this volume by Olivier Henry and Naomi Carless Unwin (= new I.Labraunda 137); the other, allegedly from Milas itself, is presented here. The provenance of the present inscription alone is of some interest, for until now the well- known dossier documenting the long drawn-out dispute over the sanctuary at Labraunda, which involved the Mylaseis, two generations of Labraundan priests, three Hellenistic kings, and, indi- rectly, the Chrysaoric League, has consisted solely of inscriptions found on site at Labraunda. So far, not a single document contemporary with the events of the 240s to 220s has emerged from Mylasa, apart from a fragmentary copy of I.Labraunda 4, which was seen and copied in Milas by Ph. Le Bas.2 Jonas Crampa, who used Le Bas’ edition of this text to restore the Labraundan original (and vice-versa), dated it, on letter forms, to the first century AD, describing it as a ‘later copy of a Labraundan original’. Crampa was rather fond of identifying later copies: sometimes correctly, but often doubtfully so. In the case of LBW 389, the printed majuscule text suggests that his dating may have been off by a few centuries, and a recent inspection of two squeezes made by Le Bas, now among the many kept in the Fonds Louis Robert in Paris, has convinced me that this inscription is in fact of the late third century BC, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Kültür Ve Turizm Bakanlığı Kültür Varlıkları Ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü Friglerin Gizemli Uygarlığı, S.64, 2007 İstanbul.)
    T.C. KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI TÜRKİYE KÜLTÜR PORTALI PROJESİ ARKEOLOJİ VE SANAT TARİHİ ESKİ ANADOLU UYGARLIKLARI PALEOLİTİK ÇAĞ (Eski Taş Çağı / Yontma Taş Çağı) Prof. Dr. Işın YALÇINKAYA EKİM - 2009 ANKARA 1. ESKİ ANADOLU UYGARLIKLARI 1. 1. Paleolitik Çağ (Eski Taş Çağı / Yontma Taş Çağı) Anahtar Kelime: İnsanlık tarihinin başlangıcı, avcılık, toplayıcılık, konar-göçer yaşam, alet üretimi. Paleolitik kavramı, 1865 yılında J. Lubbock tarafından Eski Taş Çağ’ını ifade etmek için ortaya atılmıştır. Paleolitik Çağ, insanlık tarihinin ilk basamağını oluşturmasının yanı sıra, bu tarihi sürecin %99’undan daha uzun bir bölümünü kapsamaktadır. Günümüzden yaklaşık 2.5 milyon yıl önce, insanın Afrika kıtasında ilk aleti üretmesiyle başlamış, yine Yakındoğu’da günümüzden yaklaşık 20 bin, Avrupa’da ise 10 bin yıl önce sona ermiştir. Üretim öncesi evreleri temsil eden Paleolitik uygarlıklar, üretim sonrası yerleşik yaşamın ürünü olan uygarlıkların aksine, belirli bir coğrafya ile sınırlandırılamazlar. Zira bu uygarlıklar dünya genelinde yer yer yayılmış olup, benzer özelikler sergilemektedirler. Paleolitik kültürler, IV. jeolojik zamanın ilk ve en eski evresi olan pleistosen boyunca gelişmişlerdir. Bu evrede dünya dört büyük buzullaşmaya sahne olmuştur. Buzullar kuzey yarım kürenin orta enlemlerine kadar yayılmışlardır. Buna karşılık Afrika kıtası gibi Anadolu da bu buzul takkesinin uzağında kalmış, dolayısıyla yaşama elverişli koşulları sunmuştur. Paleolitik insanlar, tükettikleri besinleri üretmeyi bilmiyorlar, ancak Doğa’nın kendilerine sunduğu yabani hayvansal ve bitkisel kaynaklarla yetinerek avcı-toplayıcı bir ekonomik modelle yaşamlarını sürdürüyorlardı. Avladıkları su aygırı, gergedan, fil gibi kalın derili memelileri av alanlarına yakın yerlerde parçalıyorlardı. Buralar kasaplık işlemlerinin gerçekleştirildiği “et parçalama atölyeleri” idi. Paleolitik insanlar, iklim dolayısıyla çevre koşullarındaki değişimlere paralel olarak yeni besin kaynakları aramak ve av hayvanlarını izlemek üzere küçük gruplar halinde yer değiştiriyorlardı.
    [Show full text]