A New Paradigm: Perspectives on the Changing Mediterranean

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A New Paradigm: Perspectives on the Changing Mediterranean A New Paradigm: Perspectives on the Changing Mediterranean Edited by Sasha Toperich and Andy Mullins Center for Transatlantic Relations Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies Johns Hopkins University 1 Sasha Toperich and Andy Mullins, A New Paradigm: Perspectives on the Changing Mediterranean Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2014 © Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2014 Center for Transatlantic Relations The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies The Johns Hopkins University 1717 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Suite 525 Washington, DC 20036 Tel: (202) 663 – 5880 Fax: (202) 663 – 5879 Email: [email protected] http://transatlantic.sais-jhu.edu ISBN 13: 9780989029483 Cover illustration by Peggy Irvine 2 A New Paradigm: Perspectives on the Changing Mediterranean Sasha Toperich and Andy Mullins, Editors Acknowledgements Preface Daniel Hamilton Introduction Sasha Toperich and Andy Mullins Regional Integration and Cooperation in North Africa Tunisia’s Awakening Economy: A Trilateral Vision to Incentivize Reforms Ghazi Ben Ahmed Libya Deserves Better Ghazi Ben Ahmed and Amel Awni Dajani An Alternative for Improving Human Security in the Middle East and North Africa Aylin Ünver Noi North Africa Awakening: New Hopes for Faster Inclusive Growth Ghazi Ben Ahmed and Slim Othmani Post-Arab Spring Security Challenges and Responses Libya: The Major Security Concern in Africa? Olivier Guitta The Arab Spring and Egypt’s Open Season against Women Emily Dyer Comparative Transitions: The Arab Spring in Local and International Context Looking for Lessons: What Transitions from across the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Can Offer the Middle East Edward P. Joseph Lebanon’s Arab Spring: The Cedar Revolution Nine Years On Rupert Sutton 3 Migration and Diaspora Europe’s ‘Rio Grande’: (Im)mobility in the Mediterranean Leila Hadj-Abdou The Mediterranean Diasporas’ Role: Another Pathway to Prosperity? Andy Mullins Women and the Mediterranean: Opportunities and Challenges for Gender Equality Libyan Women: Past, Present and Future Intisar Azzuz UN Security Council Resolution 1325 – “Women, Peace, and Security” Samra Filipović-Hadžiabdić Women’s Entrepreneurship in North Africa: Looking into the Western Balkans’ Experience Dajana Džindo Is the Development of Women Entrepreneurship in the Nordic States an Inspiration for Women in North Africa? Marianne Aringberg Laanatza and Camilla af Hällström Glass Ceilings and Constitutional Barriers: Challenges to Effective Political Participation by Women and Others in Bosnia and Herzegovina Valery Perry Early Marriages in Morocco Anissa Naqrachi Tunisian Women: Political Role, Gains and Challenges (The Case of Parity) Najla Abbes Political Parties in Algeria: The Position of Women in Operation and Representation Nadia Ait-Zai About the Authors 4 Acknowledgements This book would not have been possible without the support and input of our colleagues in Washington and around the Mediterranean Basin, who contributed significantly to the success of the Mediterranean Women in Leadership and Civil Society Conference in Sarajevo in November 2013, where this project was announced. In particular, we would like to express our gratitude to our SAIS colleagues Daniel Serwer and Michael Haltzel for their valuable insights at our Economic Fora, panel discussions and other venues dedicated to the Mediterranean Basin Initiative. America-Bosnia Foundation Fellow and Project Coordinator of the Mediterranean Basin Initiative Dajana Džindo worked tirelessly to organize the Sarajevo conference and follow-up activities, and we are thankful for her tremendous efforts. Our special thanks go to Hanna Engblom for her dedication to timely and incisive edits in the last phase of production. As always, we are grateful to Peggy Irvine and Peter Lindeman for working out the publishing details of this and many other CTR publications. The opinions expressed in the following essays are the authors’ alone, and do not necessarily represent the views of any government or institution, or those of their fellow contributors. Sasha Toperich Senior Fellow, Center for Transatlantic Relations SAIS Andy Mullins Visiting Scholar, Center for Transatlantic Relations SAIS 5 Preface Daniel Hamilton The Mediterranean Basin Initiative, launched in 2013 by the Center for Transatlantic Relations at Johns Hopkins University’s Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, has capped several years of work in the Balkans and the Mediterranean area. Working with our partners in the Mediterranean, we strive to promote a stronger relationship with the countries and peoples of North Africa and Southeast Europe. The Mediterranean Basin Initiative aims to focus the attention and support of the international community on the complicated transitional processes in North Africa, where experience from Southeast Europe over the last two decades informs our understanding of the longer-term nature of transition; the countries of the Basin have something to offer one another in several fields. The Initiative is a collaborative, issue-focused framework built around the themes of stronger transatlantic economic cooperation, empowering civil society and women in leadership, and political and academic dialogue throughout the Mediterranean. To date, we have convened two major international conferences under these auspices: the Transatlantic Economic Forum in June 2013 in Washington, and the Mediterranean Women in Leadership and Civil Society Conference in November 2013 in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. In the interim, we have regularly hosted lectures and panel discussions featuring U.S., European, and North African business leaders, policymakers, and officials. All of the authors whose work is contained in this collection were participants in one or more of these events, helping to shape the conversation about the changing nature of the Mediterranean and what role the transatlantic community can play in it. This book represents many important threads in that conversation, the direction of which, in many places – Syria, Egypt, Libya, and elsewhere – remains very much unsettled. Future Mediterranean Basin events will produce different discussions, and as in this case, discussants will not always achieve common viewpoints. But taken as a whole, the book offers a compelling vision for closer transatlantic cooperation in the Mediterranean Basin. Enjoy the reading. Daniel Hamilton Austrian Marshall Plan Foundation Professor Executive Director, Center for Transatlantic Relations 6 Introduction Sasha Toperich and Andy Mullins The Mediterranean is changing. Political tremors that began in Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia in December 2010 have shaken the entrenched order and toppled leaders in Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt. Governments around the Mediterranean are struggling to deal with flagging economies, growing unemployment, security threats, migration, and other human security challenges. Simultaneously, the Arab Spring has brought an unprecedented opportunity for democratization and inclusive growth to millions more Mediterranean citizens than ever before. Long-standing social stagnation, gender inequality, and human rights violations stand ready to be addressed by reconsidering the relationship between states and citizens, by enhancing the rule of law and prioritizing individual rights. New constitutions in Morocco, Tunisia, and Egypt (and forthcoming in Libya) spark hope for increased liberty across the region. As each of the popular movements that toppled long-standing regimes in Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt encountered severe difficulties, most observers realized that the transition process toward vibrant, democratic societies would take much more than the genuinely inspirational “will of the people.” It will require much more time and effort. Even as the revolutions that overthrew Ben Ali, Mubarak, and Qaddafi faltered, however, they created possibilities for future progress in the form of a number of new political parties and civil society organizations. New outlets in mainstream print and electronic media and on the Internet were also established, breathing fresh air into their societies. New political parties declared an end to oppression in all segments of life, pledging either to rewrite constitutions, or to pass new legislation to fight corruption, protect the rule of law, and guarantee judicial independence. But a lack of experience and political know-how on the part of the reformers, a widespread thirst for power and influence, obstructionism - usually triggered by domestic and regional special interests, and a re-assertion of power by the armed forces, especially in Egypt, have severely dampened the optimism of the Arab Spring. And as it is always easier to criticize than to praise, in all fairness, newly-formed governments worked tirelessly to bring about needed changes. But in many instances, they were faced with the simple question: Where do we begin? Previous regimes held a tight grip on their countries and had a very limited circle of trusted people that actually governed the state. To redirect governance and real responsibility to not only the respective ministries, but all other agencies, committees, and departments takes time to adjust and make functional. In the meantime, the economic 7 climate took a huge toll as consumer prices rose, political parties entered into bickering power struggle games, and performance fell far too short of people’s expectations. However, good things were achieved that will certainly enter history.
Recommended publications
  • Policy Notes for the Trump Notes Administration the Washington Institute for Near East Policy ■ 2018 ■ Pn55
    TRANSITION 2017 POLICYPOLICY NOTES FOR THE TRUMP NOTES ADMINISTRATION THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ 2018 ■ PN55 TUNISIAN FOREIGN FIGHTERS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA AARON Y. ZELIN Tunisia should really open its embassy in Raqqa, not Damascus. That’s where its people are. —ABU KHALED, AN ISLAMIC STATE SPY1 THE PAST FEW YEARS have seen rising interest in foreign fighting as a general phenomenon and in fighters joining jihadist groups in particular. Tunisians figure disproportionately among the foreign jihadist cohort, yet their ubiquity is somewhat confounding. Why Tunisians? This study aims to bring clarity to this question by examining Tunisia’s foreign fighter networks mobilized to Syria and Iraq since 2011, when insurgencies shook those two countries amid the broader Arab Spring uprisings. ©2018 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ NO. 30 ■ JANUARY 2017 AARON Y. ZELIN Along with seeking to determine what motivated Evolution of Tunisian Participation these individuals, it endeavors to reconcile estimated in the Iraq Jihad numbers of Tunisians who actually traveled, who were killed in theater, and who returned home. The find- Although the involvement of Tunisians in foreign jihad ings are based on a wide range of sources in multiple campaigns predates the 2003 Iraq war, that conflict languages as well as data sets created by the author inspired a new generation of recruits whose effects since 2011. Another way of framing the discussion will lasted into the aftermath of the Tunisian revolution. center on Tunisians who participated in the jihad fol- These individuals fought in groups such as Abu Musab lowing the 2003 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
    ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • A Medical Emergency Trafficking Pharmaceuticals from Tunisia to Libya
    This project is funded by the European Union Issue 11 | March 2020 A medical emergency Trafficking pharmaceuticals from Tunisia to Libya Jihane Ben Yahia Summary Significant quantities of authentic medicines are being smuggled into Libya from neighbouring Tunisia by organised crime networks starting in Tunisia’s main medicine hubs: the Central Pharmacy, hospitals and private pharmacies. Their successful enterprise is due to weak links in the control and management of the supply chain of authorised medicines, a situation exacerbated since the 2011 revolution in Tunisia and aided by the current conflict in Libya. From April to Septemer 2018 ENACT’s Regional Organised Crime Observatory (ROCO) for North Africa investigated the problem and this paper explores its complexities and suggests some solutions. Key points • Structural deficiencies in the control of the medicine supply chain in Tunisia have allowed criminal organisations to exploit the system. • The demand in Libya has been met specifically by Tunisia, which produces large quantities of high-quality drugs and is home to well-established international pharmaceutical companies. • The violence resulting from the conflict in Libya has left thousands in need of constant medical care, creating a demand for smuggled medicines. • While medicines have always been smuggled between the two countries, the humanitarian situation in Libya has amplified the problem. • Links with various new armed groups, themselves in need of medicines, have shifted centuries of smuggling practices. RESEARCH PAPER Background representatives of civil society organisations (CSOs) and smugglers. Early in 2018 health professionals in Tunisia reported shortages of more than 220 medicines,1 a situation Research into any aspect of transnational organised confirmed by the Tunisia Central Pharmacy (PCT), the crime encounters limitations as the necessary information public body with a monopoly on the importation and is, by definition, hidden.
    [Show full text]
  • Ess4 - 2008 Documentation Report
    ESS4 - 2008 DOCUMENTATION REPORT THE ESS DATA ARCHIVE Edition 5.5 Version Notes, ESS4 - 2008 Documentation Report ESS4 edition 5.5 (published 01.12.18): Applies to datafile ESS4 edition 4.5. Changes from edition 5.4: Czechia: Country name changed from Czech Republic to Czechia in accordance with change in ISO 3166 standard. 25 Version notes. Information updated for ESS4 ed. 4.5 data. 26 Completeness of collection stored. Information updated for ESS4 ed. 4.5 data. Israel: 46 Deviations amended. Deviation in F1-F4 (HHMMB, GNDR-GNDRN, YRBRN-YRBRNN, RSHIP2-RSHIPN) added. Appendix: Appendix A3 Variables and Questions and Appendix A4 Variable lists have been replaced with Appendix A3 Codebook. ESS4 edition 5.4 (published 01.12.16): Applies to datafile ESS4 edition 4.4. Changes from edition 5.3: 25 Version notes. Information updated for ESS4 ed.4.4 data. 26 Completeness of collection stored. Information updated for ESS4 ed.4.4 data. Slovenia: 46 Deviations. Amended. Deviation in B15 (WRKORG) added. Appendix: A2 Classifications and Coding standards amended for EISCED. A3 Variables and Questions amended for EISCED, WRKORG. Documents: Education Upgrade ESS1-4 amended for EISCED. ESS4 edition 5.3 (published 26.11.14): Applies to datafile ESS4 edition 4.3 Changes from edition 5.2: All links to the ESS Website have been updated. 21 Weighting: Information regarding post-stratification weights updated. 25 Version notes: Information updated for ESS4 ed.4.3 data. 26 Completeness of collection stored. Information updated for ESS4 ed.4.3 data. Lithuania: ESS4 - 2008 Documentation Report Edition 5.5 2 46 Deviations.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of European and National Election Results Update: September 2019
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 A Public Opinion Monitoring Publication REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit May 2019 - PE 640.149 IMPRESSUM AUTHORS Philipp SCHULMEISTER, Head of Unit (Editor) Alice CHIESA, Marc FRIEDLI, Dimitra TSOULOU MALAKOUDI, Matthias BÜTTNER Special thanks to EP Liaison Offices and Members’ Administration Unit PRODUCTION Katarzyna ONISZK Manuscript completed in September 2019 Brussels, © European Union, 2019 Cover photo: © Andrey Kuzmin, Shutterstock.com ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit within the Directorate–General for Communication (DG COMM) of the European Parliament. To contact the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit please write to: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN DISCLAIMER This document is prepared for, and primarily addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 1. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 5 DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS OVERVIEW 1979 - 2019 6 COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LAST UPDATE (31/07/2019) 7 CONSTITUTIVE SESSION (02/07/2019) AND OUTGOING EP SINCE 1979 8 PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN PROPORTION - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 28 PROPORTIONS IN POLITICAL GROUPS - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 29 PROPORTION OF WOMEN IN POLITICAL GROUPS - SINCE 1979 30 2. NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT CONSTITUTIVE SESSION 31 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Report
    National Approaches to Extremism TUNISIA Tasnim Chirchi, Intissar Kherigi, Khaoula Ghribi The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, under Grant Agreement no. 870772 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870772 Consortium Members CONNEKT COUNTRY REPORTS Published by the European Institute of the Mediterranean D3.2 COUNTRY REPORTS ON NATIONAL APPROACHES TO EXTREMISM Framing Violent Extremism in the MENA region and the Balkans TUNISIA Tasnim Chirchi, Director, Jasmine Foundation for Research and Communication Intissar Kherigi, Director of Programs, Jasmine Foundation for Research and Communication Khaoula Ghribi, Researcher, Jasmine Foundation for Research and Communication This publication is part of the WP3 of the project, lead by the Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Editors: Corinne Torrekens and Daphné de le Vingne Reviewers: Lurdes Vidal and Jordi Moreras Editorial team: Mariona Rico and Elvira García Layout: Núria Esparza December 2020 This publication reflects only the views of the author(s); the European Commission and Research Executive Agency are not responsible for any information it contains. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union or the European Institute of the Mediterranean (IEMed). Framing Violent Extremism in the MENA region and the Balkans Tunisia Overview1 COUNTRY PROFILE Government system During the period between Tunisia’s independence in 1956 and the 2011 Revolution, the Tunisian political system was a republican presidential system based on a single ruling party (the Neo-Destour Party, during Bourguiba’s period, and the Democratic and Constitutional Rally (RCD) party under Ben Ali’s era).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mirage of Regionalism in the Middle East and North Africa Post-2011
    MENARA Working Papers No. 18, October 2018 THE MIRAGE OF REGIONALISM IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA POST-2011 Raffaella A. Del Sarto and Eduard Soler i Lecha This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme under grant agreement No 693244 Middle East and North Africa Regional Architecture: Mapping Geopolitical Shifts, Regional Order and Domestic Transformations WORKING PAPERS No. 18, October 2018 THE MIRAGE OF REGIONALISM IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA POST-2011 Raffaella A. Del Sarto and Eduard Soler i Lecha1 ABSTRACT Existing regional cooperation platforms in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region are internally fragmented and largely ineffective. Focusing on the League of Arab States, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and the Arab Maghreb Union, this paper discusses attempts to re- energize and instrumentalize existing regional organizations following the Arab uprisings. It shows that regional developments at the time provided significant opportunities for regional cooperative security mechanisms to emerge, resulting in an exceptional but brief period of activism by these organizations. As the mirage of regionalism quickly faded, intra-regional rivalries, in a period of pronounced uncertainty, led to the eventual failure to foster any significant regional cooperation. While internal divisions are currently threatening the very survival of the GCC, new and potentially short-lived forms of cooperation have been emerging, with bilateral alliances between like- minded regimes becoming prominent. MENA is an increasingly fragmented but simultaneously interconnected region, as exemplified by the mismatch between failed regionalism and a growing regionalization. Concurrently, the contours of MENA regional dynamics are becoming increasingly blurred as sub-regions are transformed into the borderlands of specific regional cores, with some players in the Gulf emerging as such cores.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections 2007 Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections Volume 41
    Couverture_Ang:Mise en page 1 27.3.2008 14:33 Page 1 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2007 CHRONICLE OF PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS VOLUME 41 Published annually in English and French since 1967, the Chronicle of Parliamen tary Elections reports on all national legislative elections held throughout the world during a given year. It includes information on the electoral system, the background and outcome of each election as well as statistics on the results, distribution of votes and distribution of seats according to political group, sex and age. The information contained in the Chronicle can also be found in the IPU’s database on national parliaments, PARLINE. PARLINE is accessible on the IPU web site (http://www.ipu.org) and is continually updated. Inter-Parliamentary Union VOLUME 41 5, chemin du Pommier Case postale 330 CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Geneva – Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 919 41 50 Fax: +41 22 919 41 60 2007 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.ipu.org 2007 Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections VOLUME 41 1 January - 31 December 2007 © Inter-Parliamentary Union 2008 Print ISSN: 1994-0963 Electronic ISSN: 1994-098X Photo credits Front cover: Photo AFP/Pascal Pavani Back cover: Photo AFP/Tugela Ridley Inter-Parliamentary Union Office of the Permanent Observer of 5, chemin du Pommier the IPU to the United Nations Case postale 330 220 East 42nd Street CH-1218 Le Grand-Saconnex Suite 3002 Geneva — Switzerland New York, N.Y. 10017 USA Tel.: + 41 22
    [Show full text]
  • Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report December 29, 2016
    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 1 Module 4: Macro Report Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 4: Macro Report December 29, 2016 Country: Greece Date of Election: January 25, 2015 Prepared by: Ioannis Andreadis, Associate Professor Theodore Chadjipadelis, Professor Eftichia Teperoglou, Lecturer Evangelia Kartsounidou, PhD candidate Laboratory of Applied Political Research School of Political Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Date of Preparation: June - December 2015 NOTES TO COLLABORATORS: . The information provided in this report contributes to an important part of the CSES project. The information may be filled out by yourself, or by an expert or experts of your choice. Your efforts in providing these data are greatly appreciated! Any supplementary documents that you can provide (e.g., electoral legislation, party manifestos, electoral commission reports, media reports) are also appreciated, and may be made available on the CSES website. Answers should be as of the date of the election being studied. Where brackets [ ] appear, collaborators should answer by placing an “X” within the appropriate bracket or brackets. For example: [X] . If more space is needed to answer any question, please lengthen the document as necessary. Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 2 Module 4: Macro Report Data Pertinent to the Election at which the Module was Administered 1a. Type of Election [X] Parliamentary/Legislative [ ] Parliamentary/Legislative and Presidential [ ] Presidential [ ] Other; please specify: __________ 1b. If the type of election in Question 1a included Parliamentary/Legislative, was the election for the Upper House, Lower House, or both? [ ] Upper House [X] Lower House [ ] Both [ ] Other; please specify: __________ Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 3 Module 4: Macro Report 2a.
    [Show full text]
  • B M246 NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS (EÜ) Nr 881/2002, 27. Mai 2002
    02002R0881 — ET — 16.10.2016 — 085.001 — 1 Käesolev tekst on üksnes dokumenteerimisvahend ning sel ei ole mingit õiguslikku mõju. Liidu institutsioonid ei vastuta selle teksti sisu eest. Asjakohaste õigusaktide autentsed versioonid, sealhulgas nende preambulid, on avaldatud Euroopa Liidu Teatajas ning on kättesaadavad EUR-Lexi veebisaidil. Need ametlikud tekstid on vahetult kättesaadavad käesolevasse dokumenti lisatud linkide kaudu ►B ►M246 NÕUKOGU MÄÄRUS (EÜ) nr 881/2002, 27. mai 2002, millega kehtestatakse teatavad eripiirangud organisatsioonidega ISIL (Daesh) ja Al-Qaida seotud teatavate isikute ja üksuste vastu ◄ (EÜT L 139, 29.5.2002, lk 9) Muudetud: Euroopa Liidu Teataja nr lehekülg kuupäev ►M1 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 951/2002, 3. juuni 2002 L 145 14 4.6.2002 ►M2 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 1580/2002, 4. september 2002 L 237 3 5.9.2002 ►M3 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 1644/2002, 13. september 2002 L 247 25 14.9.2002 ►M4 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 1754/2002, 1. oktoober 2002 L 264 23 2.10.2002 ►M5 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 1823/2002, 11. oktoober 2002 L 276 26 12.10.2002 ►M6 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 1893/2002, 23. oktoober 2002 L 286 19 24.10.2002 ►M7 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 1935/2002, 29. oktoober 2002 L 295 11 30.10.2002 ►M8 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 2083/2002, 22. november 2002 L 319 22 23.11.2002 ►M9 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 145/2003, 27. jaanuar 2003 L 23 22 28.1.2003 ►M10 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 215/2003, 3. veebruar 2003 L 28 41 4.2.2003 ►M11 Komisjoni määrus (EÜ) nr 244/2003, 7.
    [Show full text]
  • New Forms of Political Party Membership Political Party Innovation Primer 5 New Forms of Political Party Membership
    New Forms of Political Party Membership Political Party Innovation Primer 5 New Forms of Political Party Membership Political Party Innovation Primer 5 © 2020 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it, provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information visit the Creative Commons website: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/>. International IDEA Strömsborg SE–103 34 Stockholm Sweden Telephone: +46 8 698 37 00 Email: [email protected] Website: <https://www.idea.int> DOI: <https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2020.25> ISBN: 978-91-7671-315-0 (PDF) Created with Booktype: <https://www.booktype.pro> International IDEA Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 5 2. What is the issue? .................................................................................................. 7 3. Perspectives on new forms of party membership .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deliverable No. D2.3 Baseline Study on Cluster B
    Ref. Ares(2020)5992759 - 27/10/2020 Call: H2020-SC6-GOVERNANCE-2019 Topic: SU-GOVERNANCE-10-2019 Funding Scheme: Research and Innovation Action (RIA) Deliverable No. D2.3 Baseline study on Cluster B: Interactions between states and religious institutions Grant Agreement no.: 870769 Project Title: Preventing and Addressing Violent Extremism through Community Resilience in the Balkans and MENA Contractual Submission Date: 30/09/2020 Actual Submission Date: 27/10/2020 Responsible partner: FMSH PAVE has received Funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 870769. PAVE (870769) D2.3– Baseline study on Cluster Grant agreement no. 870769 Project full title PAVE - Preventing and Addressing Violent Extremism through Community Resilience in the Balkans and MENA Deliverable number D2.3 Deliverable title Baseline study: interactions between state and religious institutions Type R Dissemination level PU Work package number 2 Work package leader TCD Author(s) Marie Kortam with support from case study country leaders Keywords Religion, sects, ethnicity, state, Christian, Shia, Sunni, violent extremism, vulnerability, resilience, civil society, territory, space, municipality. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870769. The author is solely responsible for its content, it does not represent the opinion of the European Commission and the Commission is not responsible for
    [Show full text]