May 2011 Newsclr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

May 2011 Newsclr 11 Volume 42 Number 5 May 2011 Minnesota Railfans Association Trip to Elbow Lake, MN By Richard Prosser Soo Line Winnipeger behind Geep 551 at the Minneapolis Coach Yards. Photo by Joe Stark Contents Meeting Notice The May meeting of the Northstar Chapter of the NRHS will be held on May 21st at 7pm, at Roseville Lutheran Church at 1215 Roselawn Avenue, midway Officer Contact Directory P.2 between Lexington and Hamline Avenues in Directions to Roseville Lutheran Church P.2 Roseville. See map on following page. Minnesota Railfans Assoc. Trip to Elbow Lake P.2 Comeback Quickens for North American P.3 There will be a pre-meeting get-together at the Keys Streetcars Cafe and Bakery at the northeast corner of Lexington Minutes of the April 16th Membership Meeting P.5 and Larpenteur starting about 5:15 pm. IMPORTANT: Proposed Passenger Rail Projects P.6 PLEASE CALL Bob Clarkson at 651-636-2323 and for Minnesota leave a message with your name and the number of Minnesota Transportation Museum Train Strikes P.6 persons coming with you. Last minute walk-ins can sometimes be a problem. and Kills Trespasser On CP Rails From Railway Age Breaking News P.7 The chapter library mission statement will be dis- From Trains Newswire P.7 cussed. Railfan Calendar P.7 Northstar Chapter June Picnic Details P.8 Bill Herzog will present a slide show entitled “Rail- roads of the Early 90s - Something for Everyone.” 1 Northstar Chapter Officers Board of Directors Office Name Email Phone President Dawn Holmberg [email protected] 763-784-8835 Vice President H. Martin Swan [email protected] 612-961-1684 Past President Cy Svobodny [email protected] 651-455-0052 National Director Bill Dredge [email protected] 952-937-1313 Treasurer Dan Meyer [email protected] 763-784-8835 Secretary Dave Norman [email protected] 612-729-2428 Trustee Bob Clarkson [email protected] 651-636-2323 Staff Program Chairman Richard Tubbesing [email protected] 763-757-1304 Newsletter Editor Russ Isbrandt [email protected] 651-426-1156 Newsletter Production Richard Tubbesing [email protected] 763-757-1304 and Distribution Chapter Librarian / John Cartwright [email protected] 651-481-8479 Historian Webmaster Dan Meyer Website: www.northstar-nrhs.org Chapter Mail Box Northstar Chapter PO Box 120832 St. Paul, MN 55112 NRHS NOTE: Consult the website for any announcements regarding chapter activities including cancellation of any meeting for any reason, including weather. Newsletter deadline for submissions is the 2nd Saturday before the meeting. MEMBERSHIP INFORMATION Dues are $48 ($36 for the National dues and $12 for the local dues). Family memberships are $5 per person additional. The student rate is $22 ($16 for the National, $6 for the Northstar Chapter). If you want to join, an application is available at http:www.northstar-nrhs.org/. Print out this application and send it with a check made payable to “Northstar Chapter NRHS” to Northstar Chapter NRHS Membership Services, P.O. Box 120832, St. Paul, MN 55112. A subscription to this newsletter may be obtained for $15 for either printed or electronic edition by sending a check to the post office box above specifying the form of the newsletter you desire. A subscription does NOT include voting privileges at chapter meetings nor any of the NRHS membership benefits and no membership application is needed. Directions to Roseville Lutheran Church Minnesota Railfans Trip to Elbow Lake From the east and west take MN 36 to Lexington Avenue. By Richard Prosser Drive south on Lexington Avenue to Roselawn Avenue From the and turn right. The large lighted parking lot is on your right MRA Cinders and Sparks 1963 as you travel west on Roselawn. Use the lower entrance to the church and turn left through the commons area. MAJESTIC MIDNIGHTER MAGNIFIGENT We’ll be in room 40, the Diamond Room. It was a small band of MRA's heartiest members which assembled November 2, 1963 for the nocturnal outing to Elbow Lake. This was the first fantrip on the Soo since the winter safari to Duluth in early 1961. Three of the entourage of 19 boarded at St.Paul. After a quick run up the Milwaukee’s Short Line, the half-hour stop at Minneapolis allowed time to marvel at the Rock Island’s overnight to Kansas City, headed by a BL-2 an early Alco (sic), which departed at 8:25. Our own train was composed of F-unit 502A painted in a blah-ish solid maroon, GP 555 painted scantily, 4 standard headend cars, 2 coaches and a standard sleeper (all Soo) for Win- nipeg, and a baggage car and coach for Portal. About 8:50 pm we backed out to begin the Soo’s weird departure from Minneapolis (beside the GN Station on the M&St.L – NP. We were just speculating as to where 2 At 11:30 pm we reached Glenwood, where the "Elite" separates from the "Majestic". We found that, on the Glenwood train board the "Majestic" is still recognized by its original name “Mountaineer”. Many pictures were taken of the haunting midnight scene. About 12:00M the "Elite" hauled by the 555, departed. The 502A tied onto our 2 cars, and at 12:15 am the "Ma- jestic" was away west. The nonstop run to Elbow Lake consumed 38 miles of moonlit countryside punctuated occasionally by small-town lights, stark black grain eleva- tors, winking green train order boards, and one prairie or dump fire. We arrived a few minutes ahead of 1:00 am. The city had ignored our inquiries for a wee-hour supper, so Dick Prosser had finally written, intimating that we Rock Island BL-2, sister to the power observed by the MRA might stir up a storm during our visit . As a result, this was members on train 15 in Minneapolis at Rock Island’s 18th the first time MRAers had the honor of a police guard! St. Chicago engine terminal. Photo by Russ Isbrandt While we walked rather boisterously up town, the patrol car warily watched our every movement. The bus depot cafe kindly opened its doors, and soon our group was feasting on everything from bacon-and-eggs to ice cream. Dick provided supper music and more back at the station, where even the patrolman joined the group to await the eastbound No.14, down by 15 minutes. Soon its head- light came blazing through the ticket room window, a strik- ing sight. A blatant horn heralded a bright red-and-white GP at the helm. We quickly entrained for the return trip. The reassembly at Glenwood, a station stop at Paynes- ville, and a stop at Loretto for a wayward order board marked the return trip, which was spent mostly in sleep. A rosy dawn flecked with clouds was coming up over the deluxe Upper Harbor development as #10-14 swerved by the Minneapolis Post Office. —RSP Soo Winnipeger (that dark maroon line near the bottom of the photo) passing by the Minneapolis downtown post office on its way to the morning arrival at the Milwaukee Road Station. Photo from the Northstar Chapter Library Earl Bey was, when the train stopped just before the 1st Street North junction and a red-faced Earl came bustling aboard. He had missed the train at the Milwaukee Station so he flagged it with a horizontal (stop) wave at this point! The conductor managed to reconcile his count after some effort, and we were away again. It was agreed that Dick Prosser’s "request night" and sing-along would wait until we were further out of town. Conditions were ideal (full moon, clear sky, lights turned out) for a night ride on the "Elite” and "Majestic". Soon we lurched through the hamlet of Hamel, scene of the 1959 Soo Winnipeger at New Hope, MN. Photo Joe Stark derailment which spawned the names of "Elite" and "Ma- Comeback Quickens for jestic” for this train. Some MRAers took up posts at the rear door to watch rails in the moonlight, and the rear North American Streetcars trainman was very cooperative in answering questions. By Douglas John Bowen, What was the speed limit on the line? "Fifty-nine" he re- Managing Editor, Railway Age plied, then with a wink and a shrug, "But…..” From April 2011 Railway Age Magazine With Dick Prosser fulfilling requests on the violin, and Blinded by the bright spotlight (or flame-throwing going many talented voices blending in song, the time and miles back and forth) of debate over U.S. high speed rail pro- passed rapidly. posals, it's easy for many to miss a U.S. resurgence of passenger rail on a more local, intimate level: streetcars. Even regular fare patrons joined in the festivities. Sand- Cities that never fully surrendered their streetcar opera- wiches and cookies brought as a "hedge" against the un- tions—New Orleans and San Francisco come to mind— known at Elbow Lake were freely passed around. are now actively pursuing their expansion. Portland, OR, 3 expanding its leadership rail role established by its suc- nership arrangement, to address a university short- cessful MAX light rail system, continues to expand its her- age—and cement a ready ridership base. alded (and complementary) four-mile Portland Streetcar operation, which debuted in July 2001. Tacoma, WA, al- Arguments for some new-start streetcar systems often ready has its modest streetcar (sold originally as "light include a favorable price point comparison to larger and rail"), while bigger neighbor Seattle, new on the scene in more expensive LRT systems. But numerous cities are terms of both LRT and streetcars, is actively pursuing ex- advancing plans for streetcars in addition to (often exist- pansion of both.
Recommended publications
  • GNC SWOT Analysis Final Report
    Final Report | Great Northern Corridor SWOT Analysis TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 6 (Final Report) 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date December 31, 2014 4. Title and Subtitle 6. Performing Organization Code Great Northern Corridor Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis Final Report 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 6 (Final Report) Olsson Associates Parsons Brinckerhoff The Beckett Group 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Olsson Associates 11. Contract or Grant No. 2111 S. 67th Street, Suite 200 Omaha, NE 68106 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research Programs Type: Project Final Report Montana Department of Transportation Period Covered: January-November 2014 2701 Prospect Avenue P.O. Box 201001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 5401 Helena MT 59620-1001 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Montana Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract The GNC Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis Final Report is the culmination of a ten-month study of the Great Northern Corridor as requested by the GNC Coalition. The Final Report combines the key messages of the previous five Technical Memoranda, which addressed the Corridor’s Infrastructure and Operations, Freight & Commodity Flows, SWOT Analysis & Scenario Planning Workshop, Economic & Environmental Impacts Analysis, and Project Prioritization. This Final Report intends to tell the compelling story of the Corridor today and how it can strategically position itself for continued and improved performance, access, safety, and reliability in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Section 4(F) Evaluation February 23, 2006
    NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR RAIL PROJECT Findings of Fact and Conclusions/ Final Section 4(f) Evaluation February 23, 2006 Minnesota Department of Transportation in cooperation with the Northstar Corridor Development Authority the Metropolitan Council and the Federal Transit Administration Northstar Project Office 155 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 755 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 215-8200 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF ISSUE...........................................................................................................................1 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................1 1.0 ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND........................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................................3 3.0 CHANGES IN THE PROJECT SINCE THE EA/DRAFT 4(F) WAS RELEASED ...............4 4.0 ADDITIONS/CORRECTIONS TO THE EA/DRAFT 4(f) EVALUATION............................5 4.1 Alternative Definition…………………………………………………………………………...5 4.2 Farmlands Section........................................................................................................................5 4.3 Wetland Mitigation Plan..............................................................................................................5 5.0 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED ..............................................................................7 5.1 Agency Comments.......................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Northstar Corridor Rail Project Work Group Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 04 - 0027 Northstar Corridor Rail Project Work Group Report Required by 2003 Minnesota Legislature Minnesota Session Laws of 2003 l't Special Session Chapter 19 - Section 75 Report Date: January 15,2004 r Northstar Work Group Report Draft January 15, 2004 Introduction The Northstar Corridor Rail Project is a proposed commuter rail project running northwest from downtown Minneapolis near the trunk highway 10 corridor. Potential stations, in addition to downtown, are Northeast Minneapolis, Fridley, Coon Rapids-Foley, Coon Rapids­ Riverdale, Anoka, Elk River, Big Lake, Becker, St. Cloud East, and Rice. The state share of funding for the project has been debated by the Minnesota Legislature since the 2000 session, but has not been authorized. Minnesota Session Laws of 2003, 1st Special Session, Chapter 19, Section 75 (see appendix A) required the commissioner of transportation, in conjunction with the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA), to convene a work group to perform two specific tasks: 1) Update ridership forecasts for Northstar commuter rail based on 2000 census data and 2) Seek updated information from the Burlington Northem Santa Fe railroad (BNSF) regarding capacity improvements, railroad usage rights, construction, risk and liability allocation, and other related issues. The commissioner must report this to chairs and ranking members of legislative committees having jurisdiction over transportation and capital investment by January 15, 2004. A work group was formed comprised of 22 people from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), NCDA, Northstar Corridor counties, and the Metropolitan Council with expertise in planning, transportation investment, project management, railroading, and the Northstar corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Holidays
    Volume 45 #10 December 2014 HAPPY HOLIDAYS TC&W St Paul Turn at Dayton Bluff (Hoffman Ave) Photo by Bob Ball Contents Meeting Notice Meeting Notice P1 The Next meeting of the Northstar Chapter of the NRHS will Officer Contact Directory P2 be the Holiday Banquet at Guldens Restaurant December 7, Editors Column P2 2014 at 4pm. Directions to Meeting Site P2 Minutes of Oct 2014 Meeting P2,3 Next business meeting will be held January 17, 2015 Obituaries P3,4 6:30 pm, at Roseville Lutheran Church at 1215 Roselawn NRHS Report P4 Avenue, midway between Lexington and Hamline Avenues in Minnesota Zephyr move P4 Roseville. See map on page 2 Northstar Commuter Service Delays P5 Amtrak Parlor cars P5 Program after the meeting – BNSF ND Work completed P5 To Be Determined. Northern Lights Open House P6 There will be a pre-meeting get-together Jan 17, 2014 at the California Trip (continued) P5,6,7 Keys Cafe and Bakery at the northeast corner of Lexington and MN Governors Rail/pipeline forum P7 Larpenteur starting about 4:45 pm. PLEASE CALL Bob Restoration of D&NM 2-8-2 P8 Clarkson at 651-636-2323 and leave a message with your name Extra news and Misc photos P8-P13 and the number of persons coming with you. Railfan Events P13-P14 Reminder: Dues for 2015 are Due! Page 1 Northstar News December 2014 Northstar Chapter Officers President H Martin Swan [email protected] 612-961-1684 Vice President Richard Tubbesing [email protected] 763-757-1304 Past President Dawn Holmberg [email protected] 763-784-8835 National Director John Goodman [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • State Rail Plan
    State Rail Plan DRAFT MARCH 2015 CONTACT LIST MnDOT Dave Christianson, Project Manager Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations [email protected] 651-366-3710 Dan Krom, Director Passenger Rail Office [email protected] 651-366-3193 Consultant Team Andreas Aeppli, Project Manager Cambridge Systematics, Inc. [email protected] 617-234-0433 Brian Smalkoski Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [email protected] 651-643-0472 MINNESOTA GO STATEWIDE RAIL PLAN Draft Plan PAGE i TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT LIST ............................................................................................................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. VII Overview of the Study .................................................................................................................................... vii Context of the 2015 Rail Plan Update ........................................................................................................... viii The Vision for Minnesota’s Multimodal Transportation System ...................................................................... ix Minnesota’s Existing and Future Rail System .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Draft Final Report December 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan draft final report Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. TKDA, Inc. December 2009 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... ES-1 Vision for Rail...................................................................................................................... ES-2 System Costs ..................................................................................................................... ES-5 Passenger Rail Performance and Benefits ......................................................................... ES-5 Rail System Development and Funding Responsibilities .................................................... ES-6 1 Overview and Vision ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose of Study .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MN Minneapolis METRO Blue Line Extension Engineering Profile
    METRO Blue Line Extension (Bottineau LRT) Minneapolis, Minnesota New Starts Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2016) Summary Description Proposed Project: Light Rail Transit 13.5 Miles, 11 Stations Total Capital Cost ($YOE): $1,536.18 Million (includes $30.0 million in finance charges) Section 5309 New Starts Share ($YOE): $752.73 Million (49.0%) Annual Operating Cost (opening year 2021): $26.66 Million 16,600 Daily Linked Trips Current Year Ridership Forecast (2014): 5,486,300 Annual Linked Trips 25,500 Daily Linked Trips Horizon Year Ridership Forecast (2035): 8,439,500 Annual Linked Trips Overall Project Rating: Medium-High Project Justification Rating: Medium Local Financial Commitment Rating: High Project Description: The Metropolitan Council (MC) is planning a light rail transit (LRT) extension of the METRO Blue Line from the existing Target Field LRT station in downtown Minneapolis to Brooklyn Park in suburban Hennepin County serving the suburban municipalities of Golden Valley, Robbinsdale and Crystal. The proposed alignment is mostly at grade and generally parallels freight rail and roadway rights of-way. The Project also includes 28 light rail vehicles, a new operations and maintenance facility in Brooklyn Park, four new park-and-ride facilities with approximately 1,700 total spaces, seven LRT bridges, and pedestrian and bicycle access to stations. Service is planned to operate every ten minutes during the day and every ten to 30 minutes during the evening on weekdays, and every ten to 15 minutes on weekends. Project Purpose: The Project is intended to improve access to employment and activity centers. Outside of downtown Minneapolis, which has nearly 140,000 jobs and a growing population, key destinations in the Project corridor include North Hennepin Community College and a large, growing Target corporate campus near the northern end of the line in Brooklyn Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak's Twilight Shoreliner Service Debuts ·
    SPECIAL REPORT: AMTRAK'S TWILIGHT SHORELINER SERVICE DEBUTS · -, The RAILROAD PRESS Magazine proudly presents two fully-illustrated stories of our American railroad heritage... The 1947 Freedom Train, and the Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee Ry. Subscribe to The Railroad Press for $16 for one year (4 issues) starting with Issue #34 featuring the 50th Anniversary of the 1947 Freedom Train, and receive Issue #32 featur­ ing North Shore Memories absolutely free!! Name Send check, money order Please begin YES!!! or credit card info to: my one year (4 issues) Address subscription to TRP for The Railroad Press City only $16.00. Please start 1150 Carlisle St. #444K with Issue #34 featuring Hanover, PA 17331 State Zip the 50th Anniversary of the Freedom Train, and send Foreign customers Phone Required for credit card orders me Issue #32 featuring write for rates Card # Exp. Chicago, North Shore and Milwaukee memories free! Dealer Inquiries Welcome! Signature Not good in conjunction with any other offer. Offerexpires 12/31/98 e October 1997al Issue 407 FE ATURES Some30 Decade Wisconsin Central's first 10 years have been eventful. Andrew S. Nelson I(nox Station32 Bed & Rails A new bed-and-breakfast in central Illinois is recommended for raiIfans. George S. Pitarys Steve Smedley DE PARTMENTS 34 4 Editorial Appalachian' Interludes 5 Letters A western railroader finds thrills in them eastern hills. 8 Expediter Patrick D. Flynn 12 Expediter Special Report 14 From the Cab 18 Burlington Northern &. Santa Fe 22 VIA Rail Canada 48 24 Conrail UP Locomotive Renumberings 2G Amtrak The post-merger motive power fleet receives new numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F – Technical Memorandum on Rail Operations Modeling
    North star Commuter Rail Exten sion Fea sibility A ssess ment Appendix F – Techni cal Memorandum on Rail Operati ons Modelin g August 4, 2020 Photo Cred t: Dave Gonzalez Prepared for By Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment Appendix F – Technical Memorandum on Rail Operations Modeling Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Development of Base Case RTC Model ................................................................................................. 1 2.1. Base Case Network ....................................................................................................................... 1 2.1.1. Turnout and Crossover Speeds ............................................................................................. 2 2.1.2. Signals ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Base Case Traffic ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1. Weekly 2020 Train Counts .................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2. Origin‐Destination ................................................................................................................. 7 2.3. Base Case Train Operations .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a – Technical Memorandum on Existing Constraints (PDF)
    Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment Appendix A – Technical Memorandum on Existing Constraints July 31, 2020 Photo Credit: Dave Gonzalez Prepared for by Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment Appendix A – Technical Memorandum on Existing Constraints Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Corridor Capacity Constraints ............................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Accommodating High‐Priority Freight Trains ................................................................................ 1 2.2. Capacity Needs .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.3. Congestion near Northtown Yard ................................................................................................. 2 3. FRA Regulations .................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Hours of Service Limitations ......................................................................................................... 3 3.1.1. FRA Regulations .................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.2. Constraints on Proposed Northstar Service .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014
    Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014 Prepared by the Olsson Associates Team Prepared for the Montana Department of Transportation 10.27.2014 Technical Memo #1 | Infrastructure and Operations Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date October 27, 2014 Great Northern Corridor SWOT Analysis – Technical Memorandum #1 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1 Olsson Associates Parsons Brinckerhoff The Beckett Group 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Olsson Associates th 2111 S. 67 Street, Suite 200 11. Contract or Grant No. Omaha, NE 68106 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research Programs Type: Technical Memorandum Montana Department of Transportation Period Covered: January 2014-July 2014 2701 Prospect Avenue PO Box 201001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 5401 Helena MT 59620-1001 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Montana Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract For the Great Northern Corridor Coalition, the Olsson Associates team is conducting a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis of the Great Northern Corridor. Technical Memorandum #1 serves as The Great Northern Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Assessment Report and provides a comprehensive description of the GNC from a freight multimodal infrastructure and operations perspective. Following are the primary GNC elements included in the report: • The existing Class I railway line operated by BNSF Railway between Chicago, Illinois and Duluth, Minnesota on the east, and Portland Oregon, Seattle, Washington and Vancouver, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Final NLX Phase I & II Architectural History Report
    PHASE I AND II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY SURVEY FOR THE NORTHERN LIGHTS EXPRESS PROJECT, ANOKA, CARLTON, HENNEPIN, ISANTI, KANABEC, PINE, AND ST. LOUIS COUNTIES, MINNESOTA, AND DOUGLAS COUNTY, WISCONSIN VOLUME I Minnesota S.P. No. TCP-NLX-12A MnDOT Contract No. 99517 Minnesota SHPO File No. 2010-0080 Wisconsin SHPO File No. 12-0089/DG May 2013 PHASE I AND II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY SURVEY FOR THE NORTHERN LIGHTS EXPRESS PROJECT, ANOKA, CARLTON, HENNEPIN, ISANTI, KANABEC, PINE, AND ST. LOUIS COUNTIES, MINNESOTA, AND DOUGLAS COUNTY, WISCONSIN VOLUME I Minnesota S.P. No. TCP-NLX-12A MnDOT Contract No. 99517 Minnesota SHPO File No. 2010-0080 Wisconsin SHPO File No. 12-0089/DG SRF Project No. 6894 (WI) The 106 Group Project No. 1226-1333 (MN) & 1226-1334 (WI) Submitted to: Minnesota Department of Transportation Passenger Rail Office, MS 480 395 John Ireland Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155-1899 and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. One Carlson Parkway North Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55110-5108 Submitted by: The 106 Group Ltd. The Dacotah Building 370 Selby Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 Principal Investigator: Saleh Miller, M.S. Report Authors: Saleh Miller, M.S. Kathryn Ohland, M.S. Katherine Scott, B.S. Kelli Andre Kellerhals, M.S. Neela Wickremesinghe, M.S. May 2013 Northern Lights Express Project Phase I and II Architectural History Survey Page i MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger Rail Alliance (Alliance) is proposing to construct the Northern Lights Express (NLX) project, a high-speed passenger railroad from the Twin Cities to the Duluth/Superior area. The Alliance has identified a preferred route alternative which follows the existing Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) corridor from the station in Minneapolis (MTI) northeast to Union Depot in Duluth.
    [Show full text]