Safety Advisory 2010-03

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Safety Advisory 2010-03 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Notices 63893 hinder the effective use and expansion Guidelines for the development of a SUMMARY: FRA is issuing Safety of America’s Marine Highways; national freight policy from a marine Advisory 2010–03 to remind railroads waterways and ports, and their transportation Perspective, and; such and their employees of the importance intermodal, road, rail, and marine high other matters, related to those above, of situational awareness and the need to connections; and guidelines for the that the Secretary or sponsor may charge stay alert whenever the job that is being development of a national freight policy the Committee with addressing. The full performed changes, particularly in main from a marine transportation Committee normally meets at least two track territory. This safety advisory perspective to the Secretary of to three times per fiscal year. contains various recommendations to Transportation via the Maritime Subcommittee meetings and railroads to ensure that these issues are Administrator. teleconferences are held more addressed by appropriate policies and DATES: Completed application forms frequently, as needed. It may also meet procedures. should reach us on or before November for extraordinary purposes. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 17, 2010. Twenty-eight (28) positions will be Ronald Hynes, Director, Office of Safety ADDRESSES: Interested candidates may filled. Organizations and companies Compliance and Assurance, Office of request an application form and submit with experience inone or more of the Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New Jersey a completed application by one of the following sectors of the marine Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, following methods: E-mail: transportation industry are encouraged telephone (202) 493–6404; or Joseph St. [email protected], subject line: to apply: Ports and Terminal Operators, Peter, Trial Attorney, Office of Chief MTSNAC Application Fax: 202–366– Shippers, Vessel Operators, Non-Marine Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 6988, ATTN: MTSNAC DFO, please Transportation Providers, Metropolitan SE., Washington, DC 20590, telephone provide name, mailing address and Planning Organizations and State DOTs, (202) 493–6052. Shipbuilders, Labor and Workforce telephone and fax numbers to send SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The application forms to. Mail: MARAD– Development, and Academia. Registered lobbyists are not eligible to overall safety of railroad operations has MTSNAC Designated Federal Officer, improved in recent years. However, a Room W21–310, U.S. Department of serve on Federal Advisory Committees. Registered lobbyists are lobbyists series of events over the past 24 months Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave., highlight the need to review current SE., Washington, DC 20590, please required to comply with provisions contained in the Lobbying Disclosure railroad procedures and practices. This provide name, mailing address and safety advisory emphasizes the need for telephone and fax numbers to send Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 110–81, as amended). railroads to review and update their application forms to: Internet: To current procedures relating to download a PDF or MS-Word Each member serves for a term of two years. Members may serve consecutive situational awareness, alertness when application form, visit MTSNAC Web working on or near main tracks, and job site at http://www.mtsnac.org. terms. All members serve at their own expense and receive no salary. While briefings whenever there is a change in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. situation. Richard Lolich, MTSNAC Designated attending meetings or when otherwise Federal Officer, Maritime engaged in committee business, Recent Incidents members will be reimbursed for travel Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., The following is a discussion of the and per diem expenses as permitted SE., Room W21–310, Washington, DC circumstances surrounding a recent fatal under applicable Federal travel 20590, [email protected], Phone: incident, and is based only on FRA’s regulations. 202–366–0704, Fax: 202–366–6988. preliminary investigation. The accident If you are interested in applying to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: is still under investigation by FRA and The become a member of the Committee, local authorities. The causes and MTSNAC is an advisory committee send a completed application to Mr. established in accordance with the contributing factors, if any, have not yet Richard Lolich, Designated Federal provisions of the Federal Advisory been established. Therefore, nothing in Officer (DFO) of the Marine Committee Act (FACA) 5 U.S.C. App. 1 this safety advisory is intended to Transportation System National (Pub. L. 92–463) and the Energy attribute a cause to the incident or place Advisory Council. Send the application Independence and Security Act of 2007 responsibility for the incident on the in time for it to be received by the DFO (Pub. L. 110–140). The MTSNAC acts or omissions of any person or on or before November 17, 2010. advises, consults with, reports to, and entity. makes recommendations to the Dated: October 12, 2010. The fatal incident occurred on Secretary on matters relating to the By Order of the Maritime Administrator. September 1, 2010, at approximately Marine Transportation System. Such Christine Gurland, 6:50 a.m., in Coon Rapids, Minnesota, matters may include, but are not limited Secretary, Maritime Administration. on the BNSF Railway’s (BNSF) Twin to: [FR Doc. 2010–26092 Filed 10–15–10; 8:45 am] Cities Division, Staples Subdivision, in Impediments that hinder the effective BILLING CODE 4910–81–P double-main track territory. The use and expansion of America’s Marine incident occurred when a westbound Highways, and the expanded use of the BNSF track geometry train stopped on marine transportation system for freight DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Main Track #1 just west of Egrett and passengers; Waterways and ports, Boulevard, a public highway-rail grade and their intermodal road, rail, and Federal Railroad Administration crossing equipped with flashers and marine highway connections and gates, to allow a BNSF roadmaster (track actions required to meet current and Safety Advisory 2010–03 supervisor) to disembark from the future national transportation system AGENCY: Federal Railroad geometry car. The roadmaster stepped integration needs; Strategy, policy, and Administration (FRA), Department of off the rear (east) end of the geometry goals to ensure an environmentally Transportation (DOT). car on the field side of Main Track #1 responsible and safe system that and onto the highway-rail grade ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory; improves the global competitiveness crossing. As the geometry train resumed staying alert and situational awareness. and national security of the U.S.; movement west, the roadmaster walked VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:45 Oct 15, 2010 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18OCN1.SGM 18OCN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 63894 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 / Monday, October 18, 2010 / Notices perpendicularly across the crossing, with regard to his or her own personal changes. Railroad operating rules and toward a BNSF vehicle parked on the safety, is individual awareness and certain Federal railroad safety opposite side of the crossing that was accountability. regulations require that these job waiting to pick him up. As he did so, FRA notes that there have been other briefings take place. The job briefing can he stepped into the path of an oncoming recent incidents in which railroad act, particularly when there is more passenger train traveling east on employees have been killed and injured than one person involved with the task, adjacent Main Track #2 at 79 mph, and after potentially becoming distracted or as a ‘‘time out,’’ so to speak, for the was struck and killed. The roadmaster unaware of changing job situations. For affected employees to reinforce the need was a 53-year-old employee with 31 instance: to exercise vigilance and awareness in years of railroad service. (1) In 2008, an incident occurred the performance of their tasks. FRA is investigating a number of when a two-person train crew, after FRA also wishes to reiterate concerns potential factors that may have been reaching their destination, was previously expressed to the railroad involved in this fatal event. FRA is instructed to secure their freight train at industry in a letter dated January 26, determining whether any of these a location beyond their normal crew 2010. In the present era of ‘‘instant factors, or any other factors it may change point. The location was on communications and technology and discover, worked to drastically change double-main track on a bridge near a information ‘overload,’ ’’ railroad the roadmaster’s job situation when he parking lot where a relief crew could employees need to maintain complete alighted from the geometry car, or reach the train. The conductor left the situational awareness and avoid provided a false sense of security cab of the locomotive to tie hand brakes distractions. Railroad employees should regarding the conditions at the crossing. in order to secure the train, but appears keep cell phones and other distracting Some of these factors include: to have done so without performing a devices turned off and focus their full (1) The potential distraction caused job briefing with the engineer and attention on the task at hand. As the by the paperwork the roadmaster was without taking his hand-held radio. He above examples indicate, even slight holding. crossed in front of the locomotive and lapses in situational awareness can lead (2) The location of the involved walked across the bridge between the to tragedy. crossing in a ‘‘quiet zone.’’ two tracks. An eastward train, Recommended Action: In light of the Consequently, the striking passenger approaching at 26 mph, observed the above discussion, and in an effort to train was not required to sound its horn conductor in the foul, sounded its maintain the safety of railroad at the grade crossing where the incident whistle, turned the locomotive’s employees on the Nation’s rail system, occurred.
Recommended publications
  • GNC SWOT Analysis Final Report
    Final Report | Great Northern Corridor SWOT Analysis TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 6 (Final Report) 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date December 31, 2014 4. Title and Subtitle 6. Performing Organization Code Great Northern Corridor Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis Final Report 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 6 (Final Report) Olsson Associates Parsons Brinckerhoff The Beckett Group 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Olsson Associates 11. Contract or Grant No. 2111 S. 67th Street, Suite 200 Omaha, NE 68106 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research Programs Type: Project Final Report Montana Department of Transportation Period Covered: January-November 2014 2701 Prospect Avenue P.O. Box 201001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 5401 Helena MT 59620-1001 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Montana Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract The GNC Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis Final Report is the culmination of a ten-month study of the Great Northern Corridor as requested by the GNC Coalition. The Final Report combines the key messages of the previous five Technical Memoranda, which addressed the Corridor’s Infrastructure and Operations, Freight & Commodity Flows, SWOT Analysis & Scenario Planning Workshop, Economic & Environmental Impacts Analysis, and Project Prioritization. This Final Report intends to tell the compelling story of the Corridor today and how it can strategically position itself for continued and improved performance, access, safety, and reliability in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Section 4(F) Evaluation February 23, 2006
    NORTHSTAR CORRIDOR RAIL PROJECT Findings of Fact and Conclusions/ Final Section 4(f) Evaluation February 23, 2006 Minnesota Department of Transportation in cooperation with the Northstar Corridor Development Authority the Metropolitan Council and the Federal Transit Administration Northstar Project Office 155 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 755 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 215-8200 TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF ISSUE...........................................................................................................................1 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................1 1.0 ADMINISTRATIVE BACKGROUND........................................................................................1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................................3 3.0 CHANGES IN THE PROJECT SINCE THE EA/DRAFT 4(F) WAS RELEASED ...............4 4.0 ADDITIONS/CORRECTIONS TO THE EA/DRAFT 4(f) EVALUATION............................5 4.1 Alternative Definition…………………………………………………………………………...5 4.2 Farmlands Section........................................................................................................................5 4.3 Wetland Mitigation Plan..............................................................................................................5 5.0 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED ..............................................................................7 5.1 Agency Comments.......................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Northstar Corridor Rail Project Work Group Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp 04 - 0027 Northstar Corridor Rail Project Work Group Report Required by 2003 Minnesota Legislature Minnesota Session Laws of 2003 l't Special Session Chapter 19 - Section 75 Report Date: January 15,2004 r Northstar Work Group Report Draft January 15, 2004 Introduction The Northstar Corridor Rail Project is a proposed commuter rail project running northwest from downtown Minneapolis near the trunk highway 10 corridor. Potential stations, in addition to downtown, are Northeast Minneapolis, Fridley, Coon Rapids-Foley, Coon Rapids­ Riverdale, Anoka, Elk River, Big Lake, Becker, St. Cloud East, and Rice. The state share of funding for the project has been debated by the Minnesota Legislature since the 2000 session, but has not been authorized. Minnesota Session Laws of 2003, 1st Special Session, Chapter 19, Section 75 (see appendix A) required the commissioner of transportation, in conjunction with the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (NCDA), to convene a work group to perform two specific tasks: 1) Update ridership forecasts for Northstar commuter rail based on 2000 census data and 2) Seek updated information from the Burlington Northem Santa Fe railroad (BNSF) regarding capacity improvements, railroad usage rights, construction, risk and liability allocation, and other related issues. The commissioner must report this to chairs and ranking members of legislative committees having jurisdiction over transportation and capital investment by January 15, 2004. A work group was formed comprised of 22 people from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), NCDA, Northstar Corridor counties, and the Metropolitan Council with expertise in planning, transportation investment, project management, railroading, and the Northstar corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy Holidays
    Volume 45 #10 December 2014 HAPPY HOLIDAYS TC&W St Paul Turn at Dayton Bluff (Hoffman Ave) Photo by Bob Ball Contents Meeting Notice Meeting Notice P1 The Next meeting of the Northstar Chapter of the NRHS will Officer Contact Directory P2 be the Holiday Banquet at Guldens Restaurant December 7, Editors Column P2 2014 at 4pm. Directions to Meeting Site P2 Minutes of Oct 2014 Meeting P2,3 Next business meeting will be held January 17, 2015 Obituaries P3,4 6:30 pm, at Roseville Lutheran Church at 1215 Roselawn NRHS Report P4 Avenue, midway between Lexington and Hamline Avenues in Minnesota Zephyr move P4 Roseville. See map on page 2 Northstar Commuter Service Delays P5 Amtrak Parlor cars P5 Program after the meeting – BNSF ND Work completed P5 To Be Determined. Northern Lights Open House P6 There will be a pre-meeting get-together Jan 17, 2014 at the California Trip (continued) P5,6,7 Keys Cafe and Bakery at the northeast corner of Lexington and MN Governors Rail/pipeline forum P7 Larpenteur starting about 4:45 pm. PLEASE CALL Bob Restoration of D&NM 2-8-2 P8 Clarkson at 651-636-2323 and leave a message with your name Extra news and Misc photos P8-P13 and the number of persons coming with you. Railfan Events P13-P14 Reminder: Dues for 2015 are Due! Page 1 Northstar News December 2014 Northstar Chapter Officers President H Martin Swan [email protected] 612-961-1684 Vice President Richard Tubbesing [email protected] 763-757-1304 Past President Dawn Holmberg [email protected] 763-784-8835 National Director John Goodman [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • State Rail Plan
    State Rail Plan DRAFT MARCH 2015 CONTACT LIST MnDOT Dave Christianson, Project Manager Office of Freight and Commercial Vehicle Operations [email protected] 651-366-3710 Dan Krom, Director Passenger Rail Office [email protected] 651-366-3193 Consultant Team Andreas Aeppli, Project Manager Cambridge Systematics, Inc. [email protected] 617-234-0433 Brian Smalkoski Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [email protected] 651-643-0472 MINNESOTA GO STATEWIDE RAIL PLAN Draft Plan PAGE i TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT LIST ............................................................................................................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................ II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. VII Overview of the Study .................................................................................................................................... vii Context of the 2015 Rail Plan Update ........................................................................................................... viii The Vision for Minnesota’s Multimodal Transportation System ...................................................................... ix Minnesota’s Existing and Future Rail System .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Draft Final Report December 2009 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan draft final report Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Kimley Horn and Associates, Inc. TKDA, Inc. December 2009 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... ES-1 Vision for Rail...................................................................................................................... ES-2 System Costs ..................................................................................................................... ES-5 Passenger Rail Performance and Benefits ......................................................................... ES-5 Rail System Development and Funding Responsibilities .................................................... ES-6 1 Overview and Vision ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose of Study .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MN Minneapolis METRO Blue Line Extension Engineering Profile
    METRO Blue Line Extension (Bottineau LRT) Minneapolis, Minnesota New Starts Engineering (Rating Assigned November 2016) Summary Description Proposed Project: Light Rail Transit 13.5 Miles, 11 Stations Total Capital Cost ($YOE): $1,536.18 Million (includes $30.0 million in finance charges) Section 5309 New Starts Share ($YOE): $752.73 Million (49.0%) Annual Operating Cost (opening year 2021): $26.66 Million 16,600 Daily Linked Trips Current Year Ridership Forecast (2014): 5,486,300 Annual Linked Trips 25,500 Daily Linked Trips Horizon Year Ridership Forecast (2035): 8,439,500 Annual Linked Trips Overall Project Rating: Medium-High Project Justification Rating: Medium Local Financial Commitment Rating: High Project Description: The Metropolitan Council (MC) is planning a light rail transit (LRT) extension of the METRO Blue Line from the existing Target Field LRT station in downtown Minneapolis to Brooklyn Park in suburban Hennepin County serving the suburban municipalities of Golden Valley, Robbinsdale and Crystal. The proposed alignment is mostly at grade and generally parallels freight rail and roadway rights of-way. The Project also includes 28 light rail vehicles, a new operations and maintenance facility in Brooklyn Park, four new park-and-ride facilities with approximately 1,700 total spaces, seven LRT bridges, and pedestrian and bicycle access to stations. Service is planned to operate every ten minutes during the day and every ten to 30 minutes during the evening on weekdays, and every ten to 15 minutes on weekends. Project Purpose: The Project is intended to improve access to employment and activity centers. Outside of downtown Minneapolis, which has nearly 140,000 jobs and a growing population, key destinations in the Project corridor include North Hennepin Community College and a large, growing Target corporate campus near the northern end of the line in Brooklyn Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak's Twilight Shoreliner Service Debuts ·
    SPECIAL REPORT: AMTRAK'S TWILIGHT SHORELINER SERVICE DEBUTS · -, The RAILROAD PRESS Magazine proudly presents two fully-illustrated stories of our American railroad heritage... The 1947 Freedom Train, and the Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee Ry. Subscribe to The Railroad Press for $16 for one year (4 issues) starting with Issue #34 featuring the 50th Anniversary of the 1947 Freedom Train, and receive Issue #32 featur­ ing North Shore Memories absolutely free!! Name Send check, money order Please begin YES!!! or credit card info to: my one year (4 issues) Address subscription to TRP for The Railroad Press City only $16.00. Please start 1150 Carlisle St. #444K with Issue #34 featuring Hanover, PA 17331 State Zip the 50th Anniversary of the Freedom Train, and send Foreign customers Phone Required for credit card orders me Issue #32 featuring write for rates Card # Exp. Chicago, North Shore and Milwaukee memories free! Dealer Inquiries Welcome! Signature Not good in conjunction with any other offer. Offerexpires 12/31/98 e October 1997al Issue 407 FE ATURES Some30 Decade Wisconsin Central's first 10 years have been eventful. Andrew S. Nelson I(nox Station32 Bed & Rails A new bed-and-breakfast in central Illinois is recommended for raiIfans. George S. Pitarys Steve Smedley DE PARTMENTS 34 4 Editorial Appalachian' Interludes 5 Letters A western railroader finds thrills in them eastern hills. 8 Expediter Patrick D. Flynn 12 Expediter Special Report 14 From the Cab 18 Burlington Northern &. Santa Fe 22 VIA Rail Canada 48 24 Conrail UP Locomotive Renumberings 2G Amtrak The post-merger motive power fleet receives new numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F – Technical Memorandum on Rail Operations Modeling
    North star Commuter Rail Exten sion Fea sibility A ssess ment Appendix F – Techni cal Memorandum on Rail Operati ons Modelin g August 4, 2020 Photo Cred t: Dave Gonzalez Prepared for By Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment Appendix F – Technical Memorandum on Rail Operations Modeling Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Development of Base Case RTC Model ................................................................................................. 1 2.1. Base Case Network ....................................................................................................................... 1 2.1.1. Turnout and Crossover Speeds ............................................................................................. 2 2.1.2. Signals ................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Base Case Traffic ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.1. Weekly 2020 Train Counts .................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2. Origin‐Destination ................................................................................................................. 7 2.3. Base Case Train Operations .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a – Technical Memorandum on Existing Constraints (PDF)
    Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment Appendix A – Technical Memorandum on Existing Constraints July 31, 2020 Photo Credit: Dave Gonzalez Prepared for by Northstar Commuter Rail Extension Feasibility Assessment Appendix A – Technical Memorandum on Existing Constraints Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Corridor Capacity Constraints ............................................................................................................... 1 2.1. Accommodating High‐Priority Freight Trains ................................................................................ 1 2.2. Capacity Needs .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.3. Congestion near Northtown Yard ................................................................................................. 2 3. FRA Regulations .................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Hours of Service Limitations ......................................................................................................... 3 3.1.1. FRA Regulations .................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.2. Constraints on Proposed Northstar Service .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014
    Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014 Prepared by the Olsson Associates Team Prepared for the Montana Department of Transportation 10.27.2014 Technical Memo #1 | Infrastructure and Operations Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date October 27, 2014 Great Northern Corridor SWOT Analysis – Technical Memorandum #1 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1 Olsson Associates Parsons Brinckerhoff The Beckett Group 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Olsson Associates th 2111 S. 67 Street, Suite 200 11. Contract or Grant No. Omaha, NE 68106 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research Programs Type: Technical Memorandum Montana Department of Transportation Period Covered: January 2014-July 2014 2701 Prospect Avenue PO Box 201001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 5401 Helena MT 59620-1001 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Montana Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract For the Great Northern Corridor Coalition, the Olsson Associates team is conducting a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis of the Great Northern Corridor. Technical Memorandum #1 serves as The Great Northern Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Assessment Report and provides a comprehensive description of the GNC from a freight multimodal infrastructure and operations perspective. Following are the primary GNC elements included in the report: • The existing Class I railway line operated by BNSF Railway between Chicago, Illinois and Duluth, Minnesota on the east, and Portland Oregon, Seattle, Washington and Vancouver, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Final NLX Phase I & II Architectural History Report
    PHASE I AND II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY SURVEY FOR THE NORTHERN LIGHTS EXPRESS PROJECT, ANOKA, CARLTON, HENNEPIN, ISANTI, KANABEC, PINE, AND ST. LOUIS COUNTIES, MINNESOTA, AND DOUGLAS COUNTY, WISCONSIN VOLUME I Minnesota S.P. No. TCP-NLX-12A MnDOT Contract No. 99517 Minnesota SHPO File No. 2010-0080 Wisconsin SHPO File No. 12-0089/DG May 2013 PHASE I AND II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY SURVEY FOR THE NORTHERN LIGHTS EXPRESS PROJECT, ANOKA, CARLTON, HENNEPIN, ISANTI, KANABEC, PINE, AND ST. LOUIS COUNTIES, MINNESOTA, AND DOUGLAS COUNTY, WISCONSIN VOLUME I Minnesota S.P. No. TCP-NLX-12A MnDOT Contract No. 99517 Minnesota SHPO File No. 2010-0080 Wisconsin SHPO File No. 12-0089/DG SRF Project No. 6894 (WI) The 106 Group Project No. 1226-1333 (MN) & 1226-1334 (WI) Submitted to: Minnesota Department of Transportation Passenger Rail Office, MS 480 395 John Ireland Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55155-1899 and SRF Consulting Group, Inc. One Carlson Parkway North Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55110-5108 Submitted by: The 106 Group Ltd. The Dacotah Building 370 Selby Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 Principal Investigator: Saleh Miller, M.S. Report Authors: Saleh Miller, M.S. Kathryn Ohland, M.S. Katherine Scott, B.S. Kelli Andre Kellerhals, M.S. Neela Wickremesinghe, M.S. May 2013 Northern Lights Express Project Phase I and II Architectural History Survey Page i MANAGEMENT SUMMARY The Minneapolis-Duluth/Superior Passenger Rail Alliance (Alliance) is proposing to construct the Northern Lights Express (NLX) project, a high-speed passenger railroad from the Twin Cities to the Duluth/Superior area. The Alliance has identified a preferred route alternative which follows the existing Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) corridor from the station in Minneapolis (MTI) northeast to Union Depot in Duluth.
    [Show full text]