DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014 Technical Memo #1: Infrastructure and Operations Assessment PERIOD COVERED JAN-JULY 2014 Prepared by the Olsson Associates Team Prepared for the Montana Department of Transportation 10.27.2014 Technical Memo #1 | Infrastructure and Operations Assessment TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 1 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date October 27, 2014 Great Northern Corridor SWOT Analysis – Technical Memorandum #1 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. 1 Olsson Associates Parsons Brinckerhoff The Beckett Group 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Olsson Associates th 2111 S. 67 Street, Suite 200 11. Contract or Grant No. Omaha, NE 68106 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Research Programs Type: Technical Memorandum Montana Department of Transportation Period Covered: January 2014-July 2014 2701 Prospect Avenue PO Box 201001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 5401 Helena MT 59620-1001 15. Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Montana Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract For the Great Northern Corridor Coalition, the Olsson Associates team is conducting a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis of the Great Northern Corridor. Technical Memorandum #1 serves as The Great Northern Corridor Infrastructure and Operations Assessment Report and provides a comprehensive description of the GNC from a freight multimodal infrastructure and operations perspective. Following are the primary GNC elements included in the report: • The existing Class I railway line operated by BNSF Railway between Chicago, Illinois and Duluth, Minnesota on the east, and Portland Oregon, Seattle, Washington and Vancouver, B.C. on the west. • Primary highways, railways, waterways and pipelines connecting with or intersecting the BNSF that serve as feeder systems or distribution systems for cargo moving across the GNC. • Intermodal facilities that support the exchange of cargo between modes within the Corridor. • Border facilities that support cargo movements on the GNC PAGE ii Technical Memo #1 | Infrastructure and Operations Assessment This memo is organized into seven primary sections: 1. A Great Northern Corridor (GNC) Overview 2. General Features of the GNC 3. Overview of Modes 4. GNC Highway System 5. GNC Port Facilities 6. GNC Railway Network 7. GNC Terminal and Other Customer Facilities 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Unrestricted. This document is available through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 21161. 19. Security Classif. (of this 21. No. of Pages 22. Price report) 20. Security Classif. (of this 88 Unclassified page) Unclassified Disclaimer Statement This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) and the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) in the interest of information exchange. The State of Montana and the United States assume no liability for the use or misuse of its contents. The contents of this document reflect the views of the authors, who are solely responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or official policies of MDT or the USDOT. The State of Montana and the United States do not endorse products of manufacturers. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, policy or regulation. PAGE iii Technical Memo #1 | Infrastructure and Operations Assessment Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose of Document ..................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Great Northern Corridor (GNC) Overview ............................................................................................. 2 Chapter 2: General Features of the Great Northern Corridor ................................................................................... 3 State Demographics ............................................................................................................................................... 3 State Economies ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 Cities and Economic Centers ................................................................................................................................. 7 Tribal Lands ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 GNC “Zones of Influence” .................................................................................................................................... 8 Border Crossings .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Chapter 3: Great Northern Corridor Modes ............................................................................................................ 11 Modal Overviews ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Chapter 4: Great Northern Corridor Highway Network ......................................................................................... 19 Key Roadways ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Operational Characteristics .................................................................................................................................. 22 Highway Freight Performance ............................................................................................................................. 31 Chapter 5: Great Northern Corridor Port Facilities................................................................................................. 34 Ports Served/Location .......................................................................................................................................... 34 Pacific Coast Port Profiles (GNC Coalition Members) ....................................................................................... 35 Inland Port Profiles (GNC Coalition Members) .................................................................................................. 37 Great Lakes Port Profiles ..................................................................................................................................... 37 Chapter 6: Great Northern Corridor Rail System .................................................................................................... 39 BNSF ................................................................................................................................................................... 41 BNSF Corridors of Commerce ............................................................................................................................ 42 BNSF GNC Mileages and Traffic ........................................................................................................................ 42 BNSF Services ..................................................................................................................................................... 43 Network ............................................................................................................................................................... 46 Crossings .............................................................................................................................................................. 54 Great Northern Corridor At-Grade Crossings ...................................................................................................... 57 Regional and Short Line Railroads ...................................................................................................................... 58 Passenger Rail Service ......................................................................................................................................... 65 PAGE iv Technical Memo #1 | Infrastructure and Operations Assessment Chapter 7: Corridor Investment Examples ............................................................................................................... 71 BNSF Corridor Investment Examples ................................................................................................................. 71 State Grant Program Examples ............................................................................................................................ 73 Federal Funding Awards ...................................................................................................................................... 73 GNC 2014 Rail TIGER Applications .................................................................................................................. 81 Chapter 8: Terminals and Multi-Modal Customer Facilities .................................................................................. 83 Intermodal (Container and Trailer) .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bonding Request Update Sept. 2020
    Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago BONDING REQUEST Intercity Passenger Rail Service Project UPDATE SEPT. 2020 TCMC SECOND TRAIN RECEIVES $31.8 MILLION FEDERAL CAPITAL GRANT On Sept. 23, 2020, the US Secretary of Transportation announced a $31.8 million grant through the Federal Railroad Administration for Wisconsin and Minnesota to be used for final design and construction of freight rail track and signal improvements in and around Winona MN, La Crescent MN, and La Crosse WI. The improvements will accommodate the Twin Cities-Milwaukee-Chicago (TCMC) Second Train, a daily round trip passenger train between the Twin Cities and Chicago along the existing Amtrak Empire Builder route. This leaves the state of Minnesota as the only uncommitted partner in making the project a reality. TCMC CAPITAL BUDGET - MN TCMC CAPITAL BUDGET - WI TOTAL $26.9M Federal (COMMITTED) $4.9M Federal (COMMITTED) $31.8M Federal $10M Minnesota (NOT COMMITTED) $6.2M Wisconsin (COMMITTED) $16.2M Local $3.8M Amtrak (COMMITTED) $1.2M Amtrak (COMMITTED) $5M Amtrak $40.7M Minnesota Project Cost $12.3M Wisconsin Project Cost $53M Total Additional support: Federal Railroad Administration awarded $12.569 million to the project for startup operating costs, Amtrak has committed to capital upgrade of the Winona station platform, Canadian Pacific Railway fully supported the federal grant application for rail infrastructure improvements. Legislative Bonding Request $10 million is requested of the Minnesota Legislature. The state will receive, in return, more than $40 million in track and signal improvements in Winona and La Crescent, Minnesota that will benefit both freight and passenger rail. This request is urgent as the FRA expects Second Train project managers to secure matching funds and execute the grant agreement by September 30, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inventory of Its Railroad Annual Reports
    PUBLIC SERVICE DEPARTMENT Railroad Annual Reports (“R” Files). Box list p. 1 Note to Researchers: To request materials, please note both the location and box numbers shown below. These files comprise boxes 754-858 (years 1871-1969) of a large set of Public Service Commission files transferred to the State Archives in 1976; and boxes 1-4 of subsequent transfers. The list for boxes 754-858 was taken from the original transfer list; the files have not been inspected. Location Box 104.H.11.2F 754 1871-1881. 104.H.11.3B 755 1882-1889. 104.H.11.4F 756 1889-1897. 104.H.11.5B 757 1891-1893. 104.H.11.6F 758 1893-1895. 104.H.11.7B 759 1895-1897. 104.H.11.8F 760 1897-1898. 104.H.11.9B 761 1898-1899. 104.H.11.10F 762 1900-1901. 104.H.12.1B 763 1901-1902. 104.H.12.2F 764 1902-1903. 104.H.12.3B 765 1903-1904. 104.H.12.4F 766 1904-1905. 104.H.12.5B 767 1905-1906. 104.H.12.6F 768 1906-1907. 104.H.12.7B 769 1907. 104.H.12.8F 770 1908. 104.H.12.9B 771 1908-1909. 104.H.12.10F 772 1909. 104.H.13.1B 773 1910. 104.H.13.2F 774 1910-1911. 104.H.13.3B 775 1911. 104.H.13.4F 776 1912. 104.H.13.5B 777 1912-1913. 104.H.13.6F 778 1913-1914. 104.H.13.7B 779 1914. 104.H.13.8F 780 1914-1915.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternatives Analysis
    Alternatives Analysis BHP Proposed Grays Harbor Potash Export Facility Hoquiam, Washington 40600-HS-RPT-55047 Revision 2 17 June 2019 Submitted by WSP USA 33301 Ninth Avenue South, Suite 300 Federal Way, Washington 98003-2600 WA17.0202.00 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS BHP PROPOSED GRAYS HARBOR POTASH EXPORT FACILITY TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Proposed Facility Overview ............................................................................. 2 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PROCESS ............................................................ 4 2.1 Section 404(b)(1) Background ......................................................................... 4 2.2 Analysis Process .............................................................................................. 4 3.0 PHASE 1 – NEED, PURPOSE, AND GEOGRAPHIC AREA............................... 6 3.1 Step 1: Project Need ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 Step 2: Basic Project Purpose and Water Dependency ................................. 7 3.2.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 7 3.2.2 Water Dependency ............................................................................................... 7 3.3 Step 3: Overall Project Purpose and Geographic Area Selection ................. 8 4.0 PHASE 2 - ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFICATION
    [Show full text]
  • Midnight Train to Georgemas Report Final 08-12-2017
    Midnight Train to Georgemas 08/12/2017 Reference number 105983 MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS MIDNIGHT TRAIN TO GEORGEMAS IDENTIFICATION TABLE Client/Project owner HITRANS Project Midnight Train to Georgemas Study Midnight Train to Georgemas Type of document Report Date 08/12/2017 File name Midnight Train to Georgemas Report v5 Reference number 105983 Number of pages 57 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Modifications Claire Mackay Principal Author 03/07/2017 James Consultant Jackson David Project 1 Connolly, Checked Director 24/07/2017 by Alan Director Beswick Approved David Project 24/07/2017 by Connolly Director James Principal Author 21/11/2017 Jackson Consultant Alan Modifications Director Beswick to service Checked 2 21/11/2017 costs and by Project David demand Director Connolly forecasts Approved David Project 21/11/2017 by Connolly Director James Principal Author 08/12/2017 Jackson Consultant Alan Director Beswick Checked Final client 3 08/12/2017 by Project comments David Director Connolly Approved David Project 08/12/2017 by Connolly Director TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6 2.1 EXISTING COACH AND RAIL SERVICES 6 2.2 CALEDONIAN SLEEPER 7 2.3 CAR -BASED TRAVEL TO /FROM THE CAITHNESS /O RKNEY AREA 8 2.4 EXISTING FERRY SERVICES AND POTENTIAL CHANGES TO THESE 9 2.5 AIR SERVICES TO ORKNEY AND WICK 10 2.6 MOBILE PHONE -BASED ESTIMATES OF CURRENT TRAVEL PATTERNS 11 3. STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 14 4. PROBLEMS/ISSUES 14 4.2 CONSTRAINTS 16 4.3 RISKS : 16 5. OPPORTUNITIES 17 6. SLEEPER OPERATIONS 19 6.1 INTRODUCTION 19 6.2 SERVICE DESCRIPTION & ROUTING OPTIONS 19 6.3 MIXED TRAIN OPERATION 22 6.4 TRACTION & ROLLING STOCK OPTIONS 25 6.5 TIMETABLE PLANNING 32 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Libby, Montana
    NORTHWEST GEOLOGY The Journal of The Tobacco Root Geological Society Volume 35, 2006 31st Annual Field Conference Libby, Montana August 3-6, 2006 Published by The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 2734 Missoula, Montana 59806 http://trgs.org Edited by: Richard I. Gibson and Robert C. Thomas Cover: Miners, Snowshoe Gulch, 1897. From Mrs. Sam Ratekin and Spokane Statesman-Review, 1959. Above: Cross section based on gravity modeling. From M.D. Kleinkopf, Geophysical Interpretations of the Libby Thrust Belt, U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 1546, 1997. The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 2734 Missoula, Montana 59806 Officers, 2006: President: Larry Smith, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte Vice-President: James Sears, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Montana, Missoula Secretary-Treasurer: George Furniss, MT Dept. of Environmental Quality, Helena Corresponding Secretary: Emily Geraghty, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Montana, Missoula Webmaster: Dick Gibson Board of Directors, 2006: Richard B. Berg, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte, MT Bruce E. Cox, Stillwater Mining Co., Nye, MT Marie Marshall Garsjo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ft. Worth, TX Richard I. Gibson, Gibson Consulting, Butte, MT Larry Johnson, Consultant, Missoula, MT Robert C. Thomas, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, U. of Montana-Western, Dillon, MT Conference Organizers, Libby Field Conference: Bruce E. Cox, Stillwater Mining Co., Nye, MT Marie Marshall Garsjo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ft. Worth, TX Ann Marie Gooden, Libby, MT ISSN: 0096-7769 © 2006 The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. http://trgs.org ii NORTHWEST GEOLOGY The Journal of The Tobacco Root Geological Society Volume 35, 2006 Libby Field Conference Table of Contents Author Page Title Montana DEQ 1 Libby District Historical Mine Narrative Art Montana 11 The Rainy Creek alkaline ultramafic igneous complex near Libby, MT Montana DEQ 17 Rainy Creek Historical Mine Narrative Derek L.
    [Show full text]
  • Boys' Book of Indian Warriors
    FOREWORD Conditions and Terms of Use When the white race came into the country of the red Copyright © Heritage History 2010 race, the red race long had had their own ways of living and Some rights reserved their own code of right and wrong. They were red, but they This text was produced and distributed by Heritage History, an were thinking men and women, not mere animals. organization dedicated to the preservation of classical juvenile history books, and to the promotion of the works of traditional history authors. The white people brought their ways, which were different from the Indians' ways. So the two races could not The books which Heritage History republishes are in the public domain and are no longer protected by the original copyright. live together. They may therefore be reproduced within the United States without To the white people, many methods of the Indians paying a royalty to the author. were wrong; to the Indians, many of the white people's The text and pictures used to produce this version of the work, methods were wrong. The white people won the rulership, however, are the property of Heritage History and are subject to certain because they had upon their side a civilization stronger than restrictions. These restrictions are imposed for the purpose of protecting the integrity of the work, for preventing plagiarism, and for helping to the loose civilization of the red people, and were able to carry assure that compromised versions of the work are not widely out their plans. disseminated. The white Americans formed one nation, with one In order to preserve information regarding the origin of this language; the red Americans formed many nations, with many text, a copyright by the author, and a Heritage History distribution date languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotrail Franchise – Franchise Agreement
    ScotRail Franchise – Franchise Agreement THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS and ABELLIO SCOTRAIL LIMITED SCOTRAIL FRANCHISE AGREEMENT 6453447-13 ScotRail Franchise – Franchise Agreement TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Interpretation and Definitions .................................................................................... 1 2. Commencement .......................................................................................................... 2 3. Term ............................................................................................................ 3 4 Franchisee’s Obligations ........................................................................................... 3 5 Unjustified Enrichment ............................................................................................... 4 6 Arm's Length Dealings ............................................................................................... 4 7 Compliance with Laws................................................................................................ 4 8 Entire Agreement ........................................................................................................ 4 9 Governing Law ............................................................................................................ 5 SCHEDULE 1 ............................................................................................................ 7 PASSENGER SERVICE OBLIGATIONS ............................................................................................. 7 SCHEDULE 1.1 ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EFFIGY MOUNDS NATIONAL MONUMENT NATIONAL MOUNDS EFFIGY a R Esource Assessment
    ® 9 00 July 2 EFFIGY MOUNDS NATIONAL MONUMENT A Resource Assessment ® Center for State of the Parks ® More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the CONTENTS world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, historical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation INTRODUCTION 1 alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are EFFIGY MOUNDS NATIONAL compromised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollu- tion, invasive plants and animals, and rapid increases in motorized MONUMENT AT A GLANCE 3 recreation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the RATINGS 4 status of and trends in conditions of critical resources. The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of KEY FINDINGS 6 the Parks program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and cultural resources in the parks, and determine how well equipped the RESOURCE MANAGEMENT National Park Service is to protect the parks—its stewardship capac- HIGHLIGHTS 8 ity. The goal is to provide information that will help policymakers, the public, and the National Park Service improve conditions in THE EFFIGY MOUNDS national parks, celebrate successes as models for other parks, and NATIONAL MONUMENT ensure a lasting legacy for future generations. ASSESSMENT 10 For more information about the methodology and research used in preparing this report and to learn more about the Center for State CULTURAL RESOURCES 10 of the Parks, visit www.npca.org/stateoftheparks or contact: NPCA, Rich History Protected and Center for State of the Parks, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Vancouver Supply Chain System
    PORT OF VANCOUVER SUPPLY CHAIN SYSTEM James Ireland Bachelor of Commerce, University of British Columbia, 1977 PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION In the Faculty of Business Administration Executive MBA O James Ireland 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: James Ireland Degree: Master of Business Administration Title of Project: Port of Vancouver Supply Chain System Supervisory Committee: Senior Supervisor Michael Parent, Associate Professor Second Reader Carolyne F. Smart, Associate Professor Date Approved: SIMON FRASER $$&2Q? UN~VERSWY~ibra ry DECLARATION OF PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection, and, without changing the content, to translate the thesislproject or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work. The author has further agreed that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by either the author or the Dean of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 27 – the Roaring Sixties
    Chapter 27 The roaring Sixties The Anaconda Aluminum Co. smelter came into the 1960s running at 87.5% of capacity after implementing a successful downstream expansion during a time of weak aluminum markets. Cautious at first, the Anaconda Company approached the decade with a modest expansion by one potline at first, then followed up with two more simultaneously. Supporting the company’s bullish optimism were a strong and growing market and a new source of hydroelectric power not far from the Flathead Valley. By 1960, Anaconda was in sixth place among U.S. aluminum producers for existing capacity or capacity under construction at 65,000 tons per year and 2.4% of total U.S. capacity. Total U.S. capacity was 2.6 million tons. The top five U.S. producers included Alcoa with 1 million tons or 38.6%; Reynolds with 701,000 tons or 26.4%; Kaiser with 609,000 tons or 23%; Ormet with 180,000 tons or 6.8%; and Harvey Aluminum with 75,000 tons or 2.8%. 1 Growth in the surrounding community was moving ahead of the plant. According to the 1960 census, Columbia Falls was the fastest growing city in Flathead County, increasing in population by 70% over the past decade to 2,126 residents. Growth was related to new jobs created in Columbia Falls, particularly by the new AAC plant and the lumber industry. 2 The smelter employed 560 workers with an annual payroll of $3.8 million. Columbia Falls’ four lumber mills – Plum Creek, F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber, Rocky Mountain Lumber, and Superior Buildings – employed about 400 workers in year-round operations while another 200 workers brought logs in from nearby forests.
    [Show full text]
  • How People Green the Port: Sustainability in Canadian Ports
    How People Green the Port: Sustainability in Canadian Ports by Kristianne R. Hendricks B.A., University of the Fraser Valley, 2014 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Geography Faculty of Environment Kristianne Rebecca Hendricks 2017 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2017 Approval Name: Kristianne Rebecca Hendricks Degree: Master of Arts Title: How People Green the Ports: Sustainability in Canadian Ports Examining Committee: Chair: Meg Holden Associate Professor Peter Hall Senior Supervisor Professor Roger Hayter Supervisor Professor Adolf Ng External Examiner Professor Asper School of Business University of Manitoba Date Defended/Approved: April 4, 2017 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract Canadian Port Authorities (CPAs) annually move $162 billion in international trade and in recent years have been faced with significant pressures to become environmentally sustainable. In response, CPAs have introduced numerous greening strategies with important implications for the dock labour force. This thesis focuses on the greening strategies undertaken by CPAs and their interplay with dockworkers; it identifies these greening strategies and assesses their implications for dockworkers. The thesis adopts a two-part methodology. First, greening measures undertaken by CPAs are categorized and compared. Second, a case study of Vancouver’s port is undertaken through interviews with a broad set of port actors in order to examine the links between labour and sustainability in the port. It is concluded that greening strategies have been an important, albeit uneven trend across CPAs and that dockworkers play an influential role in the greening of the port. Keywords: Canadian Ports; Environmental Sustainability; Labour; Vancouver iv Dedication To the three people who inspire me to keep learning every day: Shaleena, Adalia, and Zoren.
    [Show full text]
  • October /November 2007
    Washington Rail News October /November 2007 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A NotNot----forforforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." passenger system in the U.S. and continu- Update on the Amtrak Cascades and the ing to develop state partnerships. The Legislature has asked WSDOT for Northwest Corridor from Ken Uznanski an updated midrange Cascades vision. The Ken Uznanski, WSDOT Rail Office quently adjusted two more times to provide report is due Dec. 2008. Ken said we would manager, spoke at the Aug. 11 All more consistent operation. “Amtrak has be looking at 7-8 Seattle-Portland round- Aboard Washington picnic in Puyallup. done a tremendous job” restoring trips a day. He noted that several key leg- Everyone, of course, wanted to know Northwest rail service, concluded Ken. islators are saying 2009 will be the rail about the Talgo trainsets being pulled He recounted his trip to Spain in June session. from service on Thursday Aug. 2 when as part of a trade mission. Also on the trip Ridership on the Cascades has been were Amtrak Pres. Alex Kummant and gov- cracks were discovered in the upper strong this year, up 11% through August. ernment affairs Vice Pres. Joe McHugh. This despite the August drop due to the parts of some of the suspension systems. They met with various government officials These systems provide the ability for the days of cancelled and reduced service. and with Renfre, the Spanish National Rail- Even with the substitute equipment, rider- trains to travel faster through curves than ways. Renfre is spending 1.2-1.6 bill.
    [Show full text]