The Roman Triumph As Material Expression of Conquest, 211-55 BCE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Roman Triumph As Material Expression of Conquest, 211-55 BCE Engineering Power: The Roman Triumph as Material Expression of Conquest, 211-55 BCE Alyson Maureen Roy A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2017 Reading Committee: Sandra Joshel, Chair Eric Orlin Joel Walker Adam Warren Program Authorized to Offer Degree: History © Copyright 2017 Alyson Maureen Roy University of Washington Abstract Engineering Power: The Roman Triumph as Material Expression of Conquest, 211-55 BCE Alyson Maureen Roy Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Sandra Joshel, History This dissertation explores the intersection between the Roman triumph, architecture, and material culture. The triumph was a military parade that generals were granted for significant victories and represented the pinnacle of an elite Roman man’s career, engendering significant prestige. My interest is in the transformation of the transitory parade, into what I term “material expressions of power” including architecture, decoration, inscriptions, and coins. I assert that from the mid-third century BCE through the mid-first century BCE, material expressions of power became of central importance to elite expressions of prestige. More importantly, by tracing the process of bringing plundered material to Rome, constructing victory monuments, and decorating them with plundered art, I have determined that this process had a profound impact on the development of a luxury art market in Rome, through which elite Romans bought objects that resembled triumphal plunder, and on the development of a visual language of power that the Romans used to talk to each other about conquest and that they then exported into the provinces as material expressions of their authority. Acknowledgements I have many people to thank for making this dissertation possible, most importantly my committee chair Sandra Joshel, whose many meticulous readings of these chapters and thoughtful comments have profoundly shaped my work. My other specialist readers, Eric Orlin and Joel Walker, have been instrumental in helping me refine and craft my research and writing, while my fourth reader Adam Warren has contributed an incredibly useful outside perspective. Other members of the UW History community have been a continual source of support through this long process, particularly Charity Urbanski, Purnima Dhavan, and Robin Stacey. I also owe many thanks to my friends and family for their unending patience, support, and enthusiasm. Julie Osborn has faithfully read every chapter of my dissertation at least once, proving that just because you are a modern historian does not mean that you cannot help a Roman historian refine their work. My college Mira Green has spent many hours discussing or reading my work with an enthusiasm I have always appreciated. Christine Olson has been an ever-present voice in my head pushing me along since our college days. Most importantly, I owe thanks to my parents. My father, Rob Roy, has let me rant and rave about my graduate career over phone calls, lunches, and coffee dates for the past ten years. And to my mother, Ruth Roy, I offer a bittersweet thank you. Mom, you only lived to see me through my first year on this long path toward a PhD but you were always utterly convinced that I would make it. I hope, wherever you are, that you enjoy my dissertation as a gift on the ten-year anniversary of the last time we spoke. Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………....1 Chapter One: A Triumphal Landscape: The Development of Triumphal Architecture and the Transformation of Urban Space…………………………………………………………………18 Chapter Two: Triumphal Decoration and the Visual Language of Power………………………59 Chapter Three: From Triumphal Plunder to Consumer Goods: The Roman Triumph and the Creation of an Economy of Prestige……………………………………………………………..91 Chapter Four: Coins, Inscriptions, and Trophies as Material Expressions of Power…………..139 Epilogue………………………………………………………………………………………...194 Maps and Figures……………………………………………………………………………….202 Appendix 1: Triumphal Structures in the Republican Period…………………………………..226 Appendix 2: Chronological Table of Coin Hoards…………………………………………......252 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………255 List of Maps and Figures Figure 1 Map of the triumphal route in the Republican period Figure 2 Map of manubial temples and triumphal monuments in Rome, fourth through second centuries Figure 3 Map of Rome in the Republican period Figure 4 Author’s diagram of triumphal architecture built between 179 and 44 BCE Figure 5 Map of Forum Boarium showing triumphal temples in the Forum Figure 6 Plan of the Porticus Metelli showing the Temples of Juno Regina and Jupiter Stator, c. 145 BCE Figure 7 Plan of the Campus Martius including triumphal structures, drawn from Coarelli (2007) Figure 8 Alternative plan of the Campus Martius including triumphal structures, drawn from Bastien (2007) Figure 9 Diagram of select triumphal structures and nodes of the triumphal route Figure 10 3-D digital reconstruction of Pompey’s Theater Complex, c. 55 BCE Figure 11 Relief panels of the triumphal monument of M. Antonius, c. 102 BCE (also known as the so-called Altar of Domitius Ahenobarbus) Figure 12 Statue base for a triumphal monument of M. Fulvius Nobilior, c. 180 BCE Figure 13 Roman denarius of Q. Pomponius Musa (66 BCE) depicting Hercules Musarum Figure 14 Temple B in the Largo di Argentina, identified as the Temple of Fortuna Huiusce Dei, c. 101 BCE Figure 15 Colossal head of the Goddess Fortuna from the Temple of Fortuna Huiusce Dei, c. 101 BCE Figure 16 Nile Mosaic from Praeneste (c. 120-100 BCE) Figure 17 Fresco of an amphitheater riot scene from Pompeii (first century CE) Figure 18 Fresco from the Tomb of Q. Fabius, c. 322 BCE Figure 19 3-D digital reconstruction of the Porticus of Metellus, c. 145 BCE Figure 20 Artist’s drawing of the Temples of Jupiter Stator and Juno Regina, c. 145 BCE Figure 21 Statue of the Muse Calliope from Pompey’s Theater Complex, c. 55 BCE Figure 22 Relief with triumphal imagery from the Piazza della Consolazione Figure 23 Roman denarius with Jupiter and Victory, c. 208 BCE Figure 24 Roman sextans with overstrike from c. 215 BCE Figure 25 Roman dextans with Victory in a quadriga, c. 211-208 BCE Figure 26 Roman denarius with Jupiter in a quariga, c. 214-212 BCE Figure 27 Roman denarius with Victory in a quadriga, c. 157/6 BCE Figure 28 Roman denarius depicting a triumphator in a quadriga, c. 101 BCE Figure 29 Roman denarius depicting a horseman, soldier, and captives, c. 55 BCE Figure 30 Map of the pre-Roman mines in the Sierra Morena region Figure 31 Map of the Roman mines in the Sierra Morena region Figure 32 Map of the mines and mints in Roman Iberia, second and first centuries BCE Figure 33 Map of the Roman military camps in the Republican period Figure 34 Map of the coin hoards in the Iberian Peninsula in the Republican period Figure 35 Coin from the city of Ebora, Augustan period Figure 36 Map of indigenous groups in the Iberian Peninsula, c. 133 BCE Figure 37 Comparative map of coin hoards and areas of conflict during the Sertorian Wars in the Iberian Peninsula, c. 82-72 BCE Figure 38 Local coinage of the Kese, Iberian Peninsula, c. 82-72 BCE Figure 39 Inscription of Scipio Africanus from Saguntum, c. 207-205 BCE Figure 40 Map of the coin hoards in Cisalpine Gaul in the Republican period Figure 41 Map of the coin hoards in Greece in the Republican period 1 Introduction In 146 BCE, the Roman general Lucius Mummius completed the conquest of Greece by looting and razing the city of Corinth. He returned to Rome the following year with his victorious army and gathered them together with the Senate and magistrates in the Campus Martius for his triumphal procession. Scattered along a triumphal route that stretched from the Campus Martius to the precinct of Jupiter Optimus Maximus on the Capitoline Hill, spectators witnessed the exhibition of the myriad sculptures, paintings, gold and silver vessels, and other luxury goods that Mummius had seized on campaign.1 After the parade, Mummius set about enhancing his reputation by building temples, including the Temple of Hercules Victor in the Forum Boarium, decorating them with spoils, and dedicating many of the plundered statues in Italy, Greece, and Spain.2 Each sculpture highlighted the Greek artistry, while each accompanying statue base transformed the statue from a Greek votive object into a material expression of Roman conquest and reminded the viewer that Mummius, the destroyer of Corinth, honored the city and the gods with his dedication. While Mummius’ actions may seem commonplace when viewed from the perspective of late-Republican written sources, in actuality they represent a series of developments between the third and first centuries BCE that resulted in a sophisticated elite material culture that was rooted in the triumph. In this period, generals increasingly used architecture and material culture—art, luxury goods, coins, and inscriptions— to celebrate their military victories. Their actions and the patterns they established helped 1 Among the various objects Mummius seized and paraded in his triumph were a bronze statue of Zeus and twenty- one gilded shields (Paus. 5.24.4; 5.10.5), a statue of the Muses and another of Venus, as well as a painting of Dionysius by Aristiedes and another of Hercules being tortured (Strabo 8.6.23). Mummius took numerous Corinthian bronzes (Pliny NH 37.7.18; Vitr. 5.5.8). He also seized a statue of Hercules, which he made the new cult statue for his Temple of Hercules Victor (CIL 12.626). See also Edwards 2003: 50. 2 For a full list of the Greek and Latin inscriptions relating to Mummius, see Graverini 2001: 105-148.For Mummius’ Italian statue bases, see Imagines Italicae, vol.2, p.615. For Olympia, see SEG 44.410.
Recommended publications
  • Some Representative Examples of Romano-British Sculpture Author(S): F
    Some Representative Examples of Romano-British Sculpture Author(s): F. Haverfield and H. Stuart Jones Source: The Journal of Roman Studies, Vol. 2 (1912), pp. 121-152 Published by: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/295954 . Accessed: 08/05/2014 23:47 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Roman Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 169.229.32.137 on Thu, 8 May 2014 23:47:48 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SOME REPRESENTATIVE EXAMPLES OF ROMANO-BRITISH SCULPTURE. (Plates IV-IX.) By PROFESSOR F. HAVERFIELD, LL.D. D.LITT. and H. STUART JONES, M.A. The collection of casts lately prepared by the Roman Society, and described in the following pages, was designed to include representative sculptures and architectural decorations of the Roman period in Britain. It had originally been hoped that these casts might find a place in the Archaeological Exhibition held in Rome in I9II and eloquently described by Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ides of March
    P19 www.aseasonofhappiness.com The Ides of March Hey Jules, don’t be afraid... Attributed to the Bard William Shakespeare, the time of year in this spotlight was destined to become a precursor of foreboding: “Beware the Ides of March,” a soothsayer said to Julius Caesar in the play. From another source the famous historical exchange went like this: Caesar (jokingly): The Ides of March are come. Seer: Aye, Caesar, but not gone. Picture the scene: the well-to-do swanning around in togas, slaves in tow; chariots running over plebs at random in the streets; centurians rolling dice; senators whispering and plotting overthrows behind closed doors while sharpening their daggers – this was ancient Rome on the 15th March 44 B.C. Jolly Julius was sauntering on his merry way to the Theatre of Pompey, blissfully unaware that he was soon to be the star of the show as he was stabbed by no less than 60 conspirators; including his former mate Brutus to whom he commented with his dying breath: “Et tu, Brute?” And so, the Ides, for Caesar at least, turned out to be the last and worst day of his life. Maybe as well as the bucket, he also kicked off a new trend, because it wasn’t always like that. Prior to Jules messing with it, the ancient Roman calendar was complicated. Rather than numbering days of the month from the first to the last, some bright spark decided it was better to count backwards. He was probably trying to prove he was smarter than the average Roman; seeing as he understood his own calculations, whereas it was doubtful many others could.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/150819 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2017-12-05 and may be subject to change. OLIVIER HEKSTER COMMODUS an e m p e r o r a t t h e cro ssr o a T ip r ï v?Tk.7 UI t a UNIVERSITEITSBIBLIOTHEEK NIJMEGEN 230000 1145 3084 COMMODUS. AN EMPEROR AT THE CROSSROADS ' C o m m o d u s An Emperor at the Crossroads Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de letteren P roefschrift TER VERKRIJGING VAN DE GRAAD VAN DOCTOR a a n d e Ka t h o l ie k e U niversiteit N ijm e g e n , VOLGENS BESLUIT VAN HET COLLEGE VAN DECANEN IN HET OPENBAAR TE VERDEDIGEN OP WOENSDAG 10 APRIL 2002, DES NAMIDDAGS OM 3.30 PRECIES, DOOR O l i v i e r J o r a m H e k s t e r G e b o r e n o p 8 m ei 1974 t e L e id e n \ ü Uitgeverij Gieben L ' v ' A Promotores: Prof. dr L. de Blois Prof. dr Th.E.J. Wiedemann, University of Nottingham! Co-referent: Dr E.M. Moormann, Universiteit van Amsterdam Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr F.G.B. Millar, University of Oxford Dr S.T.A.M. Mols Prof. dr PJ.A.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-10444-0 — Rome and the Third Macedonian War Paul J
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-10444-0 — Rome and the Third Macedonian War Paul J. Burton Index More Information Index Abdera, Greek city on the h racian coast, 15n. second year 41 , 60 , 174 political disruption sparked by Roman h ird Macedonian War embassy, 143 second year troubles with Sparta, 13 , 82n. 23 brutalized by Hortensius, 140 Acilius Glabrio, M’. (cos. 191), 44 , 59n. 12 embassy to Rome, 140 Aetolian War s.c. de Abderitis issued, 140 , see also second year Appendix C passim given (unsolicited) strategic advice by Abrupolis, king of the h racian Sapaei, 15n. 41 Flamininus, 42 attacks Macedonia (179), 58 , 81 Syrian and Aetolian Wars Acarnania, Acarnanians, 14 second year deprived of the city of Leucas (167), 177 Battle of h ermopylae, 36 – 37 First Macedonian War recovers some cities in h essaly, 36 Roman operations in (211), 25 Aelius Ligus, P. (cos. 172), 112 politicians exiled to Italy (167), 177 Aemilius Lepidus, M. (ambassador) h ird Macedonian War embassy to Philip V at Abydus (200), 28 , second year 28n. 53 political disruption sparked by Roman Aenus and Maronea, Greek cities on the embassy, 143 h racian coast, 40 , 60 , 140 , 174 two executed by the Athenians (201), 28n. 53 declared free by the senate, 46 – 47 Achaean League, Achaeans, 12 – 13 dispute between Philip V and Rome over, Achaean War (146), 194 44 – 45 , 55 , 86 , 92 , 180 Archon- Callicrates debate (175), 61 , 61n. 29 , embassy to Rome from Maronean exiles (186/ 62n. 30 , 94 – 96 5), 45 congratulated by Rome for resisting Perseus Maronean exiles address senatorial (173), 66 , 117 commission (185), 46 conquest of the Peloponnese, 13 , 82n.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2015Watercolor Newsletter
    January 2015 Watercolor Newsletter Exhibitions of Note Masters of Watercolour Exhibition Grand Hall St. Petersburg, Russia January 20-31, 2015 40 Russian and 40 International artists will be represented. Kansas Watercolor Society National Exhibition Wichita Center for the Arts Wichita, KS November 21, 2014 – January 4, 2015 NWS Annual International Exhibition NWS Gallery San Pedro, CA November 12, 2014 - January 11, 2015 Florida Focus Gold Coast Watercolor Society City Furniture Fort Lauderdale, Florida December 13, 2014- January 30, 2015 Pennsylvania Watercolor Society's 35th International Juried Exhibition State Museum Harrisburg PA November 8, 2014 – February 8, 2015 Fourth upon a time... Harriët, Eva, Kitty, Nadja Nordiska Akvarellmuseet Museum Sweden February 8 – May 3, 2015 Along with traditional and contemporary watercolour art The Nordic Watercolour Museum (Nordiska Akvarellmuseet) has a special focus on picture storytelling for children and young people. Fourth Upon a Time... Harriët, Eva, Kitty, Nadja is the fifth exhibition with this theme in focus. Here we encounter four artists and picture book creators from four European countries. They all have a deeply personal visual language and create narratives that challenge and cause one to marvel. In the exhibition, the artists will present their books, but also completely different sides of their work. They have chosen to work together and let their different worlds collide and meet in new art, new pictures and new stories. Traces: From the collection Nordiska Akvarellmuseet Museum Sweden February 8 – May 3, 2015 The Nordic Watercolour Museum´s art collection is an ongoing and vital part of the museum´s activities. For this spring´s selection works have been chosen that associate in different ways with the theme traces.
    [Show full text]
  • A Literary Sources
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Index More Information Index A Literary sources Livy XXVI.24.7–15: 77 (a); XXIX.12.11–16: 80; XXXI.44.2–9: 11 Aeschines III.132–4: 82; XXXIII.38: 195; XXXVII.40–1: Appian, Syrian Wars 52–5, 57–8, 62–3: 203; XXXVIII.34: 87; 57 XXXIX.24.1–4: 89; XLI.20: 209 (b); ‘Aristeas to Philocrates’ I.9–11 and XLII.29–30.7: 92; XLII.51: 94; 261 V.35–40: XLV.29.3–30 and 32.1–7: 96 15 [Aristotle] Oeconomica II.2.33: I Maccabees 1.1–9: 24; 1.10–25 and 5 7 Arrian, Alexander I.17: ; II.14: ; 41–56: 217; 15.1–9: 221 8 9 III.1.5–2.2: (a); III.3–4: ; II Maccabees 3.1–3: 216 12 13 IV.10.5–12.5: ; V.28–29.1: ; Memnon, FGrH 434 F 11 §§5.7–11: 159 14 20 V1.27.3–5: ; VII.1.1–4: ; Menander, The Sicyonian lines 3–15: 104 17 18 VII.4.4–5: ; VII.8–9 and 11: Menecles of Barca FGrHist 270F9:322 26 Arrian, FGrH 156 F 1, §§1–8: (a); F 9, Pausanias I.7: 254; I.9.4: 254; I.9.5–10: 30 §§34–8: 56; I.25.3–6: 28; VII.16.7–17.1: Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae V.201b–f, 100 258 43 202f–203e: ; VI.253b–f: Plutarch, Agis 5–6.1 and 7.5–8: 69 23 Augustine, City of God 4.4: Alexander 10.6–11: 3 (a); 15: 4 (a); Demetrius of Phalerum, FGrH 228 F 39: 26.3–10: 8 (b); 68.3: cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome
    Ancient Rome William E. Dunstan ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK ................. 17856$ $$FM 09-09-10 09:17:21 PS PAGE iii Published by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 http://www.rowmanlittlefield.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright ᭧ 2011 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. All maps by Bill Nelson. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. The cover image shows a marble bust of the nymph Clytie; for more information, see figure 22.17 on p. 370. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dunstan, William E. Ancient Rome / William E. Dunstan. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7425-6832-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-7425-6833-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-7425-6834-1 (electronic) 1. Rome—Civilization. 2. Rome—History—Empire, 30 B.C.–476 A.D. 3. Rome—Politics and government—30 B.C.–476 A.D. I. Title. DG77.D86 2010 937Ј.06—dc22 2010016225 ⅜ϱ ீThe paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/ NISO Z39.48–1992. Printed in the United States of America ................
    [Show full text]
  • 11Ffi ELOGIA of the AUGUSTAN FORUM
    THEELOGIA OF THE AUGUSTAN FORUM 11ffi ELOGIA OF THE AUGUSTAN FORUM By BRAD JOHNSON, BA A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Brad Johnson, August 2001 MASTER OF ARTS (2001) McMaster University (Classics) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: The Elogia of the Augustan Forum AUTHOR: Brad Johnson, B.A. (McMaster University), B.A. Honours (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Claude Eilers NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 122 II ABSTRACT The Augustan Forum contained the statues offamous leaders from Rome's past. Beneath each statue an inscription was appended. Many of these inscriptions, known also as elogia, have survived. They record the name, magistracies held, and a brief account of the achievements of the individual. The reasons why these inscriptions were included in the Forum is the focus of this thesis. This thesis argues, through a detailed analysis of the elogia, that Augustus employed the inscriptions to propagate an image of himself as the most distinguished, and successful, leader in the history of Rome. III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Claude Eilers, for not only suggesting this topic, but also for his patience, constructive criticism, sense of humour, and infinite knowledge of all things Roman. Many thanks to the members of my committee, Dr. Evan Haley and Dr. Peter Kingston, who made time in their busy schedules to be part of this process. To my parents, lowe a debt that is beyond payment. Their support, love, and encouragement throughout the years is beyond description.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bernard, Seth G., "Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C." (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 492. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Abstract MEN AT WORK: PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, LABOR, AND SOCIETY AT MID-REPUBLICAN ROME, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard C. Brian Rose, Supervisor of Dissertation This dissertation investigates how Rome organized and paid for the considerable amount of labor that went into the physical transformation of the Middle Republican city. In particular, it considers the role played by the cost of public construction in the socioeconomic history of the period, here defined as 390 to 168 B.C. During the Middle Republic period, Rome expanded its dominion first over Italy and then over the Mediterranean. As it developed into the political and economic capital of its world, the city itself went through transformative change, recognizable in a great deal of new public infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiochus IV Rome
    Chapter 22 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 11 & 12 Babylon Medo- 445BC 4 Persian Kings Persia Alex the Great Greece N&S Kings Antiochus IV Rome Gap of Time Time of the Gentiles 1wk 3 ½ years Opposing king. Greek Empire Chapter 8 Alexander The Great King of the South King of the North 1. Ptolemy I Soter 1. Seleucus I Nicator 2. Antiochus I Soter 2. Ptolemy II Philadelphus 3. Antiochus II Theos 3. Ptolemy III Euergetes 4. Seleucus II Callinicus 5. Seleucus III Ceraunus 4. Ptolemy IV Philopator 6. Antiochus III Great 5. Ptolemy V Epiphanes 7. Seleucus IV Philopator 6. Ptolemy VI Philometor 8. Antiochus IV Epiphanes Daniel 9:27 The 70th Week 1 Week = 7 years 3 ½ years 3 ½ years Apostasy Make a covenant Stop to Temple sacrifice with the many Stop to grain offering Abomination of Desolation Crush the elect (Jews) Jacob’s Distress Jacob’s Trouble Tribulation Daniel 11:35 Some of those who have insight will fall, in order to refine, purge and make them pure until the end time; because it is still to come at the appointed time 1 John 3:2-3 2 Beloved, now we are children of God, and it has not appeared as yet what we will be. We know that when He appears, we will be like Him, because we will see Him just as He is. 3 And everyone who has his hope fixed on Him purifies himself, just as He is pure. Zechariah 13:7-9 8 “It will come about in all the land,” Declares the LORD, “That two parts in it will be cut off and perish; But the third will be left in it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Republic in 5 Timelines (Teacher Guide and Notes)
    1 180 BC: lex Villia Annalis – a law regulating the minimum ages at which a individual could how political office at each stage of the cursus honorum (career path). This was a step to regularising a political career and enforcing limits. 146 BC: The fall of Carthage in North Africa and Corinth in Greece effectively brought an end to Rome’s large overseas campaigns for control of the Mediterranean. This is the point that the historian Sallust sees as the beginning of the decline of the Republic, as Rome had no rivals to compete with and so turn inwards, corrupted by greed. 139 BC: lex Gabinia tabelleria– the first of several laws introduced by tribunes to ensure secret ballots for for voting within the assembliess (this one applied to elections of magistrates). 133 BC – the tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus, who along with his younger brother, is seen as either a social reformer or a demagogue. He introduced an agrarian land that aimed to distribute Roman public land to the poorer elements within Roman society (although this act quite likely increased tensions between the Italian allies and Rome, because it was land on which the Italians lived that was be redistributed). He was killed in 132 BC by a band of senators led by the pontifex maximus (chief priest), because they saw have as a political threat, who was allegedly aiming at kingship. 2 123-121 BC – the younger brother of Tiberius Gracchus, Gaius Gracchus was tribune in 123 and 122 BC, passing a number of laws, which apparent to have aimed to address a number of socio-economic issues and inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]