SAMS August 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SAMS August 2021 The SAMS Lyceum of Martial and Societal Antediluvian Chronicles An addendum to The SAMS Sporran August - 2021 August is Admit You're Happy Month August 1- National Raspberry Cream Pie Day August 2- National Ice Cream Sandwich Day August 3- National Watermelon Day August 4- National Chocolate Chip Cookie Day August 5- National Oyster Day August 7- International Beer Day August 10- National S'mores Day August 12- Annual Perseid Meteor Shower - Peak Night August 13- Left Handers Day August 14- National Creamsicle Day August 19- National Potato Day August 20- World Mosquito Day Sir Ronald Ross linked Malaria w/mosquitos August 21- National Spumoni Day August 24- National Spumoni Day August 25- National Banana Split Day August 28- Stuffed Green Bell Peppers Day August 29- More Herbs, Less Salt Day- you need this after all that ice cream. August 30- Toasted Marshmallow Day August 31-National Trail Mix Day How The Thistle Became Scotland's National Flower There are many Scots (mostly those not currently residing in Scotland) and the unfortunate non-Scots who have expressed some curiosity as to why Scotland chose to venerate a small prickly weed as it’s national flower. To begin with Scotland is not alone, Lorraine a province in Northeast France also holds the thistle in high regard. As a matter of note like the Scots and their world renowned cuisine, the Lorrains offer quiche and andouille and of course wine. Secondly, there are some historical/cultural anecdotes that include the humble Thistle. One of the best-known thistle legends takes place in the mid 13th century during a surprise invasion by the soldiers of the Norse king, Haakon, at Largs near Ayrshire. The story has it that after coming ashore this Viking force planned to creep up on the Scottish Clansmen and Highlanders and overcome them while they slept. To achieve complete surprise the Vikings decided to creep forward sans footwear. The stealthy barefoot Vikings were advancing toward the sleeping Scots barefoot. Unbeknownst to these unwary invaders, the ground they traversed was covered with thistle flowers. When the Vikings bare feet came down hard on a Scottish thistle their cries of shock and pain were enough to wake the sleeping Scots. Leaping to their feet, grabbing their trusty longswords (and remembering to don their shoes) the clansmen charged into battle and the rest, as they say, is history. This is where history and legend delightfully merge. There was indeed a battle at Largs. According to Norwegian legend, on the night of 30 September AD1263, Haakon Haakonarson, King of Norway, sailed to Scotland to assert his claim. During a bout of particularly stormy weather, several Norwegian vessels were driven aground on the Ayrshire coast, near the present-day town of Largs. On 2 October, while the Norwegians were salvaging their vessels, a main Scottish army arrived on the scene. Composed of infantry and cavalry, the Scottish force was commanded by Alexander of Dundonald, Steward of Scotland. The Norwegians were gathered in two groups: the larger main force on the beach and a small contingent atop a nearby mound. The advance of the Scots threatened to divide the Norwegian forces, so the contingent upon the mound ran to rejoin their comrades on the beach below. Seeing them running from the mound, the Norwegians on the beach believed they were retreating, and fled back towards the ships. Fierce fighting took place on the beach, and the Scots took up a position on the mound formerly held by the Norwegians. Late in the day, after several hours of skirmishing, the Norwegians were able to recapture the mound. The Scots withdrew from the scene and the Norwegians were able to re-board their ships. They returned the next morning to collect their dead. The Scottish version contains similar references with the exception that it was Scottish archers who held the Vikings at the beach until Alexander arrived. Hence he anguished cries of the Norwegians. The fierce battle on the beach resulted in serious losses on the Viking side. And despite several assaults from the Vikings the Scots controlled the high ground. The Vikings withdrew to what remained of there ships. The next day under the watchful eye of the victorious Scots they returned to gather their dead and burn the beached vessels. Following the battle, negotiations began that resulted in The Treaty of Perth in which Norway ceded The Hebrides and Mann to the Scots while the Norwegians retained Orkney and Shetland. Yes, the ground was covered with thistle flowers. The Battles Lost - Why the Scots Lost Their Independence This journal has often portrayed historical battles that featured Scottish victories, and there were many. This belies the fact that Scotland is not independent and hasn’t been for centuries. So despite their valor, honor, their fighting skill, the righteousness of their cause, they lost their freedom. Historically the Scots were adept at small skirmishes, hit and run tactics, think of the Border Reivers. But when it came to large scale conflicts they frequently came up short. The reasons can be attributed to many factors; internal divisions, incompetence of the leadership, a small nation versus a larger one, Lowland versus Highland, religion or any one of a number of other factors. However, the underlying theme seems to be a failure to learn from one’s mistakes. you are probably familiar with the phrase, “History repeats itself because we weren’t listening the first time.” This could really be Scotland’s unofficial motto. Initially, Scottish armies were mostly cavalry. The landed gentry composed the heavy cavalry, i.e. chainmail, swords and lances. The light cavalry were basically Reivers. They rode smaller horses capable of traveling long distances swiftly and were arrayed with weapons more suitable to guerrilla warfare like lances and bows. With more and more English invasions the typical Scots army evolved into one composed mainly of footmen, the untrained crofters and fisherman of the noble’s estates. They brought their own weapons to battle. These weapons ran the gamut from handmade farming tools, tree limbs studded with sharp steel or glass shards, to 12 foot long pikes and swords. One of which might have been, but not limited to, the Scottish longsword. The Scots also relied heavily on 'slingers' (think of David and Goliath). Then there seemed to always be an insufficiency of cavalry (mounted knights), archers and targs (shields). This proved to be their Achilles Heel. They failed to adapt to changes in warfare. Another factor would also be that there simply were more English than there were Scots. Romantic history always has the Scots charging downhill shouting loudly and wildly swinging their swords in the idealistic Highland Charge.Oh nay not verily so! Historically the standard Scottish battle formation was the schiltron. It was usually circular with the front rows of soldiers kneeling with their spear butts planted in the ground, pikes slightly elevated facing outward. (Think of the paintings depicting the “squares” at the battle of Waterloo.)The rear ranks leveled their pikes over the heads of their comrades. This created a thick-set grove of spear points virtually impenetrable to both cavalry and foot soldiers. It proved useful both in defense and offense. After fending off the attacks the schiltron would slowly advance, driving the enemy from the field. The schiltron had one glaring weakness, i.e. arrows. Many battles were lost simply because the Scots had no defense against archers. At this time archers were considered to be the single most valuable part of an army. (The universal symbol of ill will in the UK and its territories is not a solitary middle finger lifted defiantly but the index & middle finger held aloft with the thumb. This can be traced back to the morbid custom of amputating those fingers of captured bowmen.) To begin with, the famed “English archers” of yore weren’t all English. They were mostly Welsh! The weapon they used the longbow was made from either yew or wych elm. It was referred to as an English longbow because it was associated with the English army. If the Celtic Welsh could cultivate archers, why didn’t the Celtic Scots? A skilled archer of that era could fire several (2-3) arrows simultaneously and repeat the process up to eight times a minute. Now consider this. Since the beginning of history, one of the best defenses against archers was a stout shield. Yet this too evaded the Scottish mindset of that time. Time and time again the courageous Scots were simply shot from the field. The Romans used a variant of the schiltron called “The Turtle”. It was square or rectangular depending on the number of legionnaires in the formation. Their version of the schiltron resembled a turtle because the interior soldiers held their shields over the heads of their compatriots while the outside held them vertical, creating an umbrella-like shell, resembling a turtle. It was an excellent defense against archery. The Romans had been in Scotland for several hundred years, it would have been virtually impossible for the Scots to not have seen the Turtle in operation. Yet for some unfathomable reason the Scots never adopted this tactic. This leads us to the Scottish Wars of Independence. Some examples of battles lost in these wars would include: The battle of Dupplin Moor, on 11 August AD1332 about 2,500 Englishmen landed in Fife led by Edward Baliol. These were The Disinherited, nobles who supported the English Crown and lost their land when they were defeated. Near Perth they found themselves facing a Scottish army five to ten times their size, with another army rushing to trap them.
Recommended publications
  • The History of Scotland from the Accession of Alexander III. to The
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT LOS ANGELES THE GIFT OF MAY TREAT MORRISON IN MEMORY OF ALEXANDER F MORRISON THE A 1C MEMORIAL LIBRARY HISTORY OF THE HISTORY OF SCOTLAND, ACCESSION OF ALEXANDEB III. TO THE UNION. BY PATRICK FRASER TYTLER, ** F.RS.E. AND F.A.S. NEW EDITION. IN TEN VOLUMES. VOL. X. EDINBURGH: WILLIAM P. NIMMO. 1866. MUEKAY AND OIBB, PUINTERS. EDI.VBUKOII V.IC INDE X. ABBOT of Unreason, vi. 64 ABELARD, ii. 291 ABERBROTHOC, i. 318, 321 ; ii. 205, 207, 230 Henry, Abbot of, i. 99, Abbots of, ii. 206 Abbey of, ii. 205. See ARBROATH ABERCORN. Edward I. of England proceeds to, i. 147 Castle of, taken by James II. iv. 102, 104. Mentioned, 105 ABERCROMBY, author of the Martial Achievements, noticed, i. 125 n.; iv. 278 David, Dean of Aberdeen, iv. 264 ABERDEEN. Edward I. of England passes through, i. 105. Noticed, 174. Part of Wallace's body sent to, 186. Mentioned, 208; ii. Ill, n. iii. 148 iv. 206, 233 234, 237, 238, 248, 295, 364 ; 64, ; 159, v. vi. vii. 267 ; 9, 25, 30, 174, 219, 241 ; 175, 263, 265, 266 ; 278, viii. 339 ; 12 n.; ix. 14, 25, 26, 39, 75, 146, 152, 153, 154, 167, 233-234 iii. Bishop of, noticed, 76 ; iv. 137, 178, 206, 261, 290 ; v. 115, n. n. vi. 145, 149, 153, 155, 156, 167, 204, 205 242 ; 207 Thomas, bishop of, iv. 130 Provost of, vii. 164 n. Burgesses of, hanged by order of Wallace, i. 127 Breviary of, v. 36 n. Castle of, taken by Bruce, i.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Wars of Independence
    The Scottish Wars of Independence 1 Course Outline In this unit you will learn about… The Death of King Alexander III The Succession Crisis King Edward’s Invasion of Scotland William Wallace and Scottish Resistance Robert the Bruce The Battle of Bannockburn 2 King Alexander III In this section, you will learn… Who King Alexander III was and why he was a strong King. How King Alexander III died. Why his death caused a huge problem in Scotland. Who was given the throne after Alexander III How King Edward I of England took control of Scot- land. 3 King Alexander III Learning intentions : • To understand who King Alexander III was and why he was thought to be a good king. • To describe the death of King Alexander III. The ‘Golden Age’ of Scotland 1266-1281 Alexander III ruled Scotland from the age of 8. He was crowned in 1249 and he had a successful reign as King. Scotland had trouble with Viking invaders from Norway raid- ing the coast, stealing and killing Scottish people. In 1266, Alexander III signed a peace treaty (an agreement) with the Vikings to stop them from invading Scotland’s coasts. This created peace and security for the people living there. They were now safe and secure. Alexander was also known for dealing fairly with his subjects. Scotland was a ’feudal society’. This meant that the King owned all of the land. However, he divided up care of the land among his barons (or nobles). They rented this land to people to live on and were essentially in charge of certain areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Technology in the 12Th Century
    Zurich Model United Nations MILITARY TECHNOLOGY IN THE 12TH CENTURY The following list is a compilation of various sources and is meant as a refer- ence guide. It does not need to be read entirely before the conference. The breakdown of centralized states after the fall of the Roman empire led a number of groups in Europe turning to large-scale pillaging as their primary source of income. Most notably the Vikings and Mongols. As these groups were usually small and needed to move fast, building fortifications was the most efficient way to provide refuge and protection. Leading to virtually all large cities having city walls. The fortifications evolved over the course of the middle ages and with it, the battle techniques and technology used to defend or siege heavy forts and castles. Designers of castles focused a lot on defending entrances and protecting gates with drawbridges, portcullises and barbicans as these were the usual week spots. A detailed ref- erence guide of various technologies and strategies is compiled on the following pages. Dur- ing the third crusade and before the invention of gunpowder the advantages and the balance of power and logistics usually favoured the defender. Another major advancement and change since the Roman empire was the invention of the stirrup around 600 A.D. (although wide use is only mentioned around 900 A.D.). The stirrup enabled armoured knights to ride war horses, creating a nearly unstoppable heavy cavalry for peasant draftees and lightly armoured foot soldiers. With the increased usage of heavy cav- alry, pike infantry became essential to the medieval army.
    [Show full text]
  • King Robert the Bruce
    King Robert the Bruce By A. F. Murison KING ROBERT THE BRUCE CHAPTER I THE ANCESTRY OF BRUCE When Sir William Wallace, the sole apparent hope of Scottish independence, died at the foot of the gallows in Smithfield, and was torn limb from limb, it seemed that at last 'the accursed nation' would quietly submit to the English yoke. The spectacle of the bleaching bones of the heroic Patriot would, it was anticipated, overawe such of his countrymen as might yet cherish perverse aspirations after national freedom. It was a delusive anticipation. In fifteen years of arduous diplomacy and warfare, with an astounding expenditure of blood and treasure, Edward I. had crushed the leaders and crippled the resources of Scotland, but he had inadequately estimated the spirit of the nation. Only six months, and Scotland was again in arms. It is of the irony of fate that the very man destined to bring Edward's calculations to naught had been his most zealous officer in his last campaign, and had, in all probability, been present at the trial—it may be at the execution—of Wallace, silently consenting to his death. That man of destiny was Sir Robert de Brus, Lord of Annandale and Earl of Carrick. The Bruces came over with the Conqueror. The theory of a Norse origin in a follower of Rollo the Ganger, who established himself in the diocese of Coutances in Manche, Normandy, though not improbable, is but vaguely supported. The name is territorial; and the better opinion is inclined to connect it with Brix, between Cherbourg and Valognes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Selected Scottish Battlefields
    Scotland’s Historic Fields of Conflict Gazetteer: page 1 GAZETTEER OF SELECTED SCOTTISH BATTLEFIELDS LIST OF CONTENTS ABERDEEN II ............................................................................................................. 4 ALFORD ...................................................................................................................... 9 ANCRUM MOOR...................................................................................................... 19 AULDEARN .............................................................................................................. 26 BANNOCKBURN ..................................................................................................... 34 BOTHWELL BRIDGE .............................................................................................. 59 BRUNANBURH ........................................................................................................ 64 DRUMCLOG ............................................................................................................. 66 DUNBAR II................................................................................................................ 71 DUPPLIN MOOR ...................................................................................................... 79 FALKIRK I ................................................................................................................ 87 FALKIRK II ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Media and the Tourist Imagination
    The Media and the Tourist Imagination Tourism Studies and Media Studies both pose key issues about how we perceive the world. They raise acute questions about how we relate local knowledge and immediate experience to wider global processes and both play a major role in creating our map of national and international cultures. The Media and the Tourist Imagination adopts a multidisciplinary approach to explore the interactions between tourism and media practices within contemporary culture; in which the consumption of images has become increasingly significant. The contributions are divided between those written from media studies awareness, concerned with the way the media imagine travel and tourism; those written from the point of view of the study of tourism, which consider how tourism practices are affected or inflected by the media, and those that attempt a direct comparison between the practices of tourism and the media. A number of common themes and concerns arise with particular emphasis upon the image as the object of consumption. While exploring the overlapping roles of tourism and the media, the collection is also concerned to mark out their different approaches to the structuring and organizing of experience and the way in which this leads to a dynamic interchange between them. Tourism and the Media are discussed as separate processes through which identity is constructed in relation to space and place. David Crouch is Professor of Cultural Geography and Tourism, Director of the Culture, Lifestyle and Landscape research group at University of Derby, and Rhona Jackson and Felix Thompson are Lecturers in Film and Television Studies at the University of Derby.
    [Show full text]
  • Jack Waddell MEDIEVAL ARMS, ARMOR, and TACTICS And
    MEDIEVAL ARMS, ARMOR, AND TACTICS And Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the faculty Of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Bachelor or Science By Jack Waddell And 7 Brent Palermo Date: December 10th , 2002 Approved: Abstract This project examined and photographed nearly 300 examples of medieval arms and armor in the Higgins Armory collection, and documented the characteristics of armor, weapons, and their associated tactics during the middle ages (approximately 500CE to 1500CE) as well as the historical and technological background against which they were employed. 2 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Higgins Armory Museum for providing us with access to authentic medieval artifacts and essential research tools. 3 Table of Contents 1. Abstract Vol 1, p 2 2. Acknowledgements 3 3. Table of Contents 4 4. Introduction (By Brent Palermo) 5 5. Historical background of the Middle Ages (By Jack Waddell) 6 a. History 6 b. Feudalism 35 c. War in the Middle Ages 40 d. Medieval Technology 47 6. Armor of the Middle Ages (By Jack Waddell) 55 a. Introduction 55 b. Armor for the Body 57 c. Armor for the Head 69 d. Armor for the Legs 78 e. Armor for the Arms 81 f. Shields 87 g. Snapshots of Armor Ensembles over Time 90 7. Weapons of the Middle Ages (By Brent Palermo) 100 a. Daggers 100 b. Swords 105 c. Axes 112 d. Halberds 115 e. Glaives 116 f. Bills 117 g. Maces 117 h. Morning Stars 118 i. Flails 119 j. War Hammers 120 k.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction Military equipment and tactical organization in pre-modern western civilizationunderwent fundamental changes between the rise of civilizationin Mesopotamia in the late fourth millennium scr and the revival of Europe in the seventeenthcentury of the Common Era. During this four and a half millennium span, the art of warfare reached a sophisticatedlevel, with commandersfully realizingthe tacticalcapabilities of shock and missilecombat in largebattlefield situations, situations where perhaps150,000 men took the field at the sametime along a narrow front. On a battlefield where the force-to- spaceratio wasso high, the ability to orchestratetens of thousandsof infantry and cavalry becamenecessary for ultimate victory. Modern principles of war, such as the primacy of the offensive, mass and economy of force, were understoodby ancient, classical,medieval and early modern generals,and appliedon battlefieldsthroughout the period under study. Warfarein the Medieaal LVorldis the secondvolume of a two-volume study. It covers the developmentof warfare from the rise of Byzantium in the early medievalperiod through to the Thirty YearsWar (c.500--1648cn), following volume l, Warfare in the Ancient ll/orld, which surveyed the evolution of warfare on the battlefields of the Near East and Europe between the beginning of the Bronze Age and the fall of the Western Roman Empire (r.3000BCE - r.500 cr). Through an explorationof fifty-four selectbattlefield engagements(thirty-three battles in volume two and twenty-one battles in volume one), it is this author's intention to survey the changing tactical relationshipsbetween the four weaponsystems - heavyand light infantry, and heavyand light cavalry- focusingon how shockand missilecombat evolved on the battlefieldsof the Near East and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • 31295012428586.Pdf (7.498Mb)
    THE RE-MAKING OF A MYTHIC HERO: SCOTTISH NATIONALISM IN BRAVEHEART by KENNETH CARR HAWLEY, B.A. A THESIS IN ENGLISH Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial FulfiUment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved May, 1998 'JOI r3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <^ % / /\)o • ' For their continued care and support, I thank my parents, Dan and Byrdic C oP- ^ Hawley, and my in-laws, Odell and LaVonne Farr. For her enduring afrecrion and encouragement, I thank my wife, Deborah. For their patient guidance and instruction, I thank the members of my thesis committee, Dr. Michael Schoencckc and Dr. Heather Barkley. Without my family, I would have floundered; without my wife, I would ha\c faltered; and without my committee, I would have failed. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 11 CHAPTER I. MYTHMAKING, NATIONAL IDENTFFY, AND SCOTTISH HISTORIOGRAPHY . 1 Bisset and Historiography 2 The Declaration of Arbroath and National Identity 5 Blind Harry the Minstrel and Mythmaking . 8 Braveheart and Historiography 12 n. ELicrriNG ANTLENGLISH SENTIMENT 16 Edward I .... 16 Smythe ..... 31 m. ELicrriNG ANTI-COLONIAL SENTIMENT 37 Irishmen ..... 38 Scottish Nobles .... 44 Bruce the Leper .... 58 IV. ELICITING PRO-INDEPENDENCE SENTIMENT 67 Malcolm Wallace 68 Campbell .... 73 Scotland and Robert Bruce 78 V. MODIFYING THE MYTHIC HERO 90 Murron .... 90 Edward II . 99 Isabella .... 104 VI. RE-MAKING THE MYTHIC HERO 113 William Wallace 113 VII. BRAVEHEARTS IDEOLOGICAL PROJECT 132 SELE(rrED BIBLIOGRAPHY .... 136 111 CHAPTER I MYTHMAKING, NATIONAL n:)ENTrrY, AND SCOTTISH HISTORIOGRAPHY Nationalistic sentiment looks to the past to legitimate the present and secure the friture; it re-makes history, appropriaring mythic legends as it forges a narional identirs'.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedoms Sword
    The Scottish Wars against England Male lust and a mole can be blamed for the opening of the Scottish Wars of Independence. The male lust was in the breast of Alexander the Third, The King of Scots. (Note that the ruler is not King of Scotland but King of Scots.) Alexander had a new French wife, Yolande, and longed throughout the council meeting in Edinburgh to be back with his wife across the storm lashed Firth of Forth in Fife. Against all advice, Alexander set out for Fife and barely made it across the Forth by boat before galloping off with two attendants. In the storm the riders lost sight of each other and next morning the body of the king was found at the foot of the cliffs at Kinghorn. Legend has it that his horse was startled by a mole and both rider and horse fell over the cliff. The good news was that there was an heir but she was a mere female child and the granddaughter of the King of Norway. Not ideal for a faction driven Scotland but even this lifeline was lost when the Maid of Norway died shortly after landing in Scotland. Two factions now contended for the throne namely the Balliols and the Bruces who represented the most powerful noble sin the land. Into this argument came Edward the First of England who agreed to adjudicate as an honest and impartial broker. To be fair to Edward, his decision to award John Balliol the crown was probably the right one as he just about had a stronger claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Term Explanation Aide-De-Camp French Term Translated As "Camp Assistant"
    Term Explanation Aide-de-camp French term translated as "Camp assistant". A military officer appointed as secretary and confidential assistant to a general or equivalent rank. Annales of Trokelowe A chronicle covering the period 1259 to 1323, written sometime after 1330 by John of Trokelowe, a Benedcitine monk at St Albans. Further text was subsequently written by Henry de Blaneford Arquebus An early muzzle-loading firearm, popular from the 15th-17th centuries. Comprising, a long smoothbore barrel with a wooden stock, it was a successor to the hand-cannon and precursor to the later muskets and rifles. Orignally equipped with a matchlock firing mechanism, this would be superseded by the wheel lock and then the flintlock mechanisms. Arquebusier A soldier trained in the use of the arquebus. Assured men Scottish Borderers who had sworn allegiance to the English crown. Baggage train The baggage train of an army was its logistical heart, and could be a substantial size. In additon to vehicles carrying supplies and vital equipment for the army, there would also be a variety of camp followers. These could include tradesmen such as armourers and blacksmiths, servants of the soldiers and officers in the army and even the wives and families of the troops. On many occasions, those people who had lost their homes or livelihoods as a result of the actions of war would also be found within the train, looking both for protection and what work they could find to survive. Barbour, John A 14th century Scots poet and writer of The Brus, a long narrative account of the Scottish Wars of Indepedence and the role of Robert Bruce and the Black Douglas in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Theotokis, Georgios (2010) the Campaigns of the Norman Dukes of Southern Italy Against Byzantium, in the Years Between 1071 and 1108 AD
    Theotokis, Georgios (2010) The campaigns of the Norman dukes of southern Italy against Byzantium, in the years between 1071 and 1108 AD. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/1884/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the Author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] The topic of my thesis is “The campaigns of the Norman dukes of southern Italy to Byzantium, in the years between 1071 and 1108 A.D.” As the title suggests, I am examining all the main campaigns conducted by the Normans against Byzantine provinces, in the period from the fall of Bari, the Byzantine capital of Apulia and the seat of the Byzantine governor (catepano) of Italy in 1071, to the Treaty of Devol that marked the end of Bohemond of Taranto’s Illyrian campaign in 1108. My thesis, however, aims to focus specifically on the military aspects of these confrontations, an area which for this period has been surprisingly neglected in the existing secondary literature. My intention is to give answers to a series of questions, of which
    [Show full text]