In Duhumbi Is Elusive. the Glottal Stop and Glottal Constriction Are Clearly Phonetic Features Among All Speakers of All Varieties of the Language

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Duhumbi Is Elusive. the Glottal Stop and Glottal Constriction Are Clearly Phonetic Features Among All Speakers of All Varieties of the Language DUHUMBI GLOTTAL STOP AND GLOTTAL CONSTRICTION The phonologic position of the glottal stop /ʔ/ in Duhumbi is elusive. The glottal stop and glottal constriction are clearly phonetic features among all speakers of all varieties of the language. However, there is no convincing evidence that it occurs as a distinctive phoneme. Rather, the glottal stop co-occurs as a glottal closure on onset vowels /a, e, i, o/, as a sub-phonemic feature combined with creaky voice and rising pitch on certain open vowels /a, e, o, u/, or as allophone of the plosives, mainly the velar plosive /k/, in coda position in certain phonotactic environments. In the following description, the first section describes the occurrence of the glottal stop in syllable- initial position. The next section describes the occurrence of the glottal stop as allophone of the (velar) plosive in coda position. Debucallisation of the syllable-final (velar) plosive can be shown to result in sandhi forms depending on morphophonotactic position of the velar plosive. Because of this diachronic process of lenition, minimal pairs that appear to show the opposition between the plosive /k/ and the glottal stop /ʔ/ are shown to solely depend on the morphophonotactic position. The final section describes the distinctive Duhumbi vowels /aq, eq, oq, uq/. GLOTTALISED VOCALIC ONSETS In Duhumbi, there are not many instances of onset vowels in unique roots, mainly limited to prefixes, interjections and Bodish and Tshangla loans, with only a limited number of occurrences in native lexemes. Excluding the prefixes, the most common onset vowel is /u/, followed by /a/ and /o/. There are only a handful of instances of onset vowels /i/, all in native lexemes, and /e/, mainly in loans. Three of the most widely used prefixes have a vocalic onset, namely the kinship prefix a- (marginally o-/u-); the adjective prefix o- and the adjective prefix u-. Hence, onset vowels are common in lexemes containing the basic question morpheme a, e.g. abe ‘what’; adi ‘how’; apʰi ‘how much’; and the basic demonstrative o this and its derivatives, e.g. 0ʨʰi ‘this here’, okʰo ‘there’, ose ‘like this/that’. They also occur as prefixes on nouns such as okʰow ‘liquid’; ojow ‘fat’; utɕʰaŋ ‘lid’; udam ‘piece’; uguŋ ‘spirit, shadow’; ulap ‘leaf’; uli ‘seed’; uɕu ‘fruit’; utʰuŋ ‘stem’; ujuŋ ‘handle’, where they often correspond with a- in other Western Kho-Bwa languages. Other occurrences vocalic onsets in native lexemes include ak {ta} ‘get stuck’; an {da} ‘select’; ar {da} ‘become dry’; at {da} ‘kill’; aw {da} ‘itch’; aj {da} ‘see’; en {da} ‘be spilt’; i {da} ‘die’; is {ta} ‘recognise’; ir {da} ‘ride, mount (a horse)’; in {da} ‘say’; ikku ‘hiccup’; om ‘three’; om {ta} ‘keep waiting’; oŋ {da} ‘go’; oŋ {ta} ‘fit’; orba ‘snore’; oj ‘husband; uk ‘hide ; ur ‘arrow body’; ur {ta} ‘mix’. Onsets in vowel position are also found in Bodish and Tshangla loans, such as akpu crow, cf. TT akpu, TSB akpakʰa; alak branch, cf. BL alak; am mango, cf. Tshangla amse > Hin. आम aːm; ani nun, cf. Tib. a-ni; ara liquor, cf. TSB ara; emriŋ swastika, cf. Tib. g.yuṅ-druṅ, TSD emriŋ; eri raw silk, cf. TSD eri ~ elin; er Kaleej pheasant, cf. TT er, BL er; ortoŋ internal part of throat, cf. TSB ɔrtɔŋ throat. Finally, we widely find onset vowels commonly in interjections and pauses, such as ah ‘ehm’; akej ‘oops’; ana ‘right, ok, well’; atsow ‘ouch’; aj ‘ok’; eh ‘oh’; oŋ ‘yes, right’ and owej ‘hey’. Except for the close back vowel /u/, all the other vowels, when occurring in onset position, whether in open or in closed syllables, are preceded by a non-phonemic glottal stop or glottal constriction, which is usually and most clearly manifested in creaky voice of the vowel. This can be shown in the spectrograms and waveforms for the respective tokens and minimal pair ar {da} [ʔa̰ɹ ~ ˀa̰ɹ] ‘to dry’, 1 er [ʔɛ̰ɹ ~ ˀɛ̰ɹ] ‘blood pheasant’; ir {da} [ʔḭɹ ~ ˀḭɹ] ‘to mount and ride (a horse)’; orba [ʔɔ̰ɹbaː ~ ˀɔ̰ɹbaː] ‘a snore’; but ur {ta} [uɹ] ‘to mix (flour in boiling water to a dough); to scratch (scalp and hair); to hold and shake (someone by clothes or arms)’. As can be seen in the respective spectrograms and waveforms (Figures 1-5), all vocalic onsets except the vowel /u/ show a more or less pronounced glottal onset and in all cases creaky voice that is not phonotactically conditioned by the following rhotic consonant but the result of the preceding glottal onset. 2 Figures 1-5. Spectrograms and waveforms of pre-glottalised vocalic onsets The creakiness of vocalic onsets /a, e, i, o/ is a highly pronounced phonetic feature, with impact on all the surrounding vowels. Hence, the choice of a carrier sentence (goq ___ innyi) with a glottal constriction preceding and following the tokens was one of the major methodological flaws of the PhD research, as this influenced the quality of tokens with vocalic onsets and open rhymes tremendously. The situation in Duhumbi has some parallels in other languages, and from a historical-comparative point of view perhaps, most noteably with Tibetan. In written Tibetan, the onset ཨུ་ is almost exclusively found in loans and nativised loans from Sanskrit (such as ut-pal ‘blue poppy Meconposis sp.’, cf. Sanskrit ut-pa-la ‘blue lotus’), Chinese (such as u-yon ‘committee member’, cf. Chinese 委员 wěiyuán ‘committee member’) and Mongol (such as u-rge ‘the top of a tent pole that protrudes above the canvas’, cf. Monglian Өрх [ɵrx] ‘top of the tent’). There are hardly any native Tibetan lexemes that have the onset ཨུ་, if any at all; however, the same can be said of the vocalic onset that are written in Tibetan as ཨི་, ཨོ་ and ཨེ་: all of these occur almost exclusively in Sanskrit, Chinese or Mongolian loans. In fact, the only common onset is ཨ་, which is, for example, common in kinship terms. On the other hand, the vocalic onset འུ་ is much more common, and occurs in what may be presumed to be native lexemes, such as ḥu-lag ‘compulsory post or labour service’, ḥu-su ‘coriander’, ḥug-pa ‘owl’, ḥud ‘swaggering, boasting’, ḥub-pa ‘to collect, to sweep together’ and ḥur ‘busy activity, rush’. Zhang (1987: 41–6) analysed the Tibetan letter ཨ that Hill (2010: 115) transcribes as q as representing a glottal stop in Old Tibetan. Hill (2010: 115-116), however, argues against this analysis and observes that q functions in the Tibetan script as a null consonant marking a vocalic onset. He does, however, remark that, perhaps, in Old Tibetan all vowel-initial words might have been articulated with a sub-phonemic glottal stop, similar to German. As for the Tibetan grapheme འ་, Hill (2005), transcribing it with v, argues on basis of evidence from Tibetan dialects that when preceding a vowel onset and the labial approximant -w-, it represents a voiced velar fricative [ɣ]. 3 Contemporary evidence from Duhumbi indicates that in onset position and particularly monosyllabically, the point and manner of articulation of the vowel /u/ trigger a more open, voiced or perhaps breathy onset closer to a voiced glottal fricative onset [ɦu], whereas all the other vowels have a clear glottal reinforcement in the form of an unvoiced glottal plosive preceding the vowel onset which results in creakiness of the vowel, i.e. [ʔa̰, ʔɛ̰, ʔḭ, ʔɔ̰]. However, the voiced glottal fricative and the unvoiced glottal plosive and creakiness of the vowel have only a sub-phonemic status. The glottal onsets of the vowels /a, e, i, o/ are represented in the phonetic transcription, but not in the phonemic transcription, used for transcribing the Duhumbi texts. GLOTTALISATION OF THE CODA PLOSIVES Among Duhumbi speakers there are various realisations of the syllable-final velar plosive /k/ following the open and open-mid back vowels /a, o, e, i/. Glottal reinforcement of these rhymes is extremely common, not only in Duhumbi, but also in other languages, such as Tshangla (Bodt 2014). Whereas the rhyme -ak/-ok/-ek/-ik may be realised pre-glottalised and released [-ˀk] or pre- glottalised and unreleased [-ˀk̚], it is also commonly realised as glottal stop combined with creaky phonation on the vowel [a̰ʔ], [ɔ̰ʔ] [ḛʔ], [ḭʔ] or simply as a creaky vowel [a̰], [ɔ̰], [ḛ], [ḭ]. A coda velar stop preceded by vowel /a/ in a monosyllabic word or as the coda ultima of a polysyllabic word in isolation is elided in Khispi with subsequent lengthening of the vowel to [aː] but commonly realised as a glottal stop with maintenance of the short vowel length in Duhumbi [aʔ], i.e. *[-ak] > Duh. [-aʔ] / Khis. [-aː]. As the waveform and spectrograms (Figures 6-8) show, the exact realisation of the syllable-final velar plosive, even when spoken in a single sequence by a single speaker, varies between an unreleased velar plosive [bʲɛk̚] with little or no creaky voice, and an increase in the degree of creakiness in the vowel of [bʲɛ̰ʔ]. 4 Figure 6. Waveform and spectrogram of bek {da} [bʲɛk̰ ]̚ ‘ripen, mature (vi)’. Figure 7. Waveform and spectrogram of bek {da} [bʲɛʔ]̰ ‘ripen, mature (vi)’. 5 Figure 8. Waveform and spectrogram of bek {da} [bʲɛʔ]̰ ‘ripen, mature (vi)’. Phonotactic conditions play a major role in the extent to which glottalisation and glottal replacement of coda plosives occurs. Released and unreleased realisations are more commonly attested when a root is followed by an unvoiced suffix, glottaly constricted realisations are more often observed when followed by a syllable with a voiced onset. An example are the verb roots, such as the minimal pairs dek {da} ‘shoot’ and dek {ta} ‘be stunted’.
Recommended publications
  • A Contrastive Study of the Ibibio and Igbo Sound Systems
    A CONTRASTIVE STUDY OF THE IBIBIO AND IGBO SOUND SYSTEMS GOD’SPOWER ETIM Department Of Languages And Communication Abia State Polytechnic P.M.B. 7166, Aba, Abia State, Nigeria. [email protected] ABSTRACT This research strives to contrast the consonant phonemes, vowel phonemes and tones of Ibibio and Igbo in order to describe their similarities and differences. The researcher adopted the descriptive method, and relevant data on the phonology of the two languages were gathered and analyzed within the framework of CA before making predictions and conclusions. Ibibio consists of ten vowels and fourteen consonant phonemes, while Igbo is made up of eight vowels and twenty-eight consonants. The results of contrastive analysis of the two languages showed that there are similarities as well as differences in the sound systems of the languages. There are some sounds in Ibibio which are not present in Igbo. Also many sounds are in Igbo which do not exist in Ibibio. Both languages share the phonemes /e, a, i, o, ɔ, u, p, b, t, d, k, kp, m, n, ɲ, j, ŋ, f, s, j, w/. All the phonemes in Ibibio are present in Igbo except /ɨ/, /ʉ/, and /ʌ/. Igbo has two vowel segments /ɪ/ and /ʊ/ and also fourteen consonant phonemes /g, gb, kw, gw, ŋw, v, z, ʃ, h, ɣ, ʧ, ʤ, l, r/ which Ibibio lacks. Both languages have high, low and downstepped tones but Ibibio further has contour or gliding tones which are not tone types in Igbo. Also, the downstepped tone in Ibibio is conventionally marked with exclamation point, while in Igbo, it is conventionally marked with a raised macron over the segments bearing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Lexical Tone Perception in Chinese Mandarin Anna Björklund
    Lexical Tone Perception in Chinese Mandarin Anna Björklund University of Florida 1 ABSTRACT Perceptual asymmetry, where Stimulus A is more often confused for B than B is for A or vice versa, has been observed in multiple lexical contexts, such as vowels (Polka & Bohn, 2003) and consonants (Dar, Mariam & Keren-Portnoy, 2018). Because historically perceptual space was assumed to be Euclidean, perception of stimuli was in turn assumed to be symmetrical, and observations of asymmetry were explained as simply response bias (Polka & Bohn, 2003). However, further examination of such biases has suggested that they are a much more fundamental occurrence. This study examines the effects of memory load and native language on perceptual bias in lexical tone perception of Mandarin Chinese for native speakers of Mandarin and English. Native speakers of both languages were given an AX categorical discrimination task with each combination of the four lexical Mandarin tones. To examine the effects of training on this bias, they were then trained on one of two tones (1 and 4) and given the same sequence of discrimination tasks again. Each pre- and post-training discrimination task featured both 250 ms and 1000 ms ISI intervals. 2 0. INTRODUCTION TO PERCEPTUAL ASYMMETRY It is often assumed that perception is symmetrical: that is, when presented with two stimuli, A and B, it is equally as easy to discriminate going from stimuli A to B as going from B to A. Although there had long been data that conflicted with such a model, the aberrant data was explained as response bias (Polka and Bohn, 2003), and subsequently ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • IPA Bingo Individual Symbols
    DescriptionMatching symbol DescriptionMatching symbol open voiceless back glottal unrounded stop vowel A / IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. DescriptionMatching symbol DescriptionMatching symbol near-open voiced front bilabial unrounded æ stop vowel b IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. DescriptionMatching symbol DescriptionMatching symbol open-mid voiced back dental rounded fricative vowel ç D IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. DescriptionMatching symbol DescriptionMatching symbol open-mid voiced front alveolar unrounded stop vowel E d IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. Descriptio Matching symbol Descriptio Matching symbol close-mid voiced front post-alveolar unrounded e affricate d vowel Z IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. DescriptionMatching symbol DescriptionMatching symbol near-close voiceless near-front labiodental unrounded fricative vowel I f IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. DescriptionMatching symbol DescriptionMatching symbol close voiced front velar unrounded stop g vowel i IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press. IPA Bingo individual symbols. © 2000 Cascadilla Press.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Phonetic Symbols
    LIST OF PHONETIC SYMBOLS a open front unrounded vowel—modern RP man, bath æ front vowel between open and open-mid—traditional RP man ɐ near open central unrounded vowel—traditional RP gear [gɪɐ] ɑ: open back unrounded vowel—RP harsh ɒ open back rounded vowel—RP dog b voiced bilabial plosive—RP bet ɔ: open mid-back rounded vowel—RP caught d voiced alveolar plosive—RP daddy dʒ voiced palato-alveolar fricative—RP John ð voiced dental fricative—RP other e close-mid front unrounded vowel—traditional RP bed ɛ open-mid front unrounded vowel—modern RP bed ə(:) central unrounded vowel—RP initial vowel in another; modern RP nurse ɜ: open-mid central unrounded vowel—traditional RP bird f voiceless labiodental fricative—RP four g voiced velar plosive—RP go h voiceless glottal fricative—RP home i(:) close front unrounded vowel—RP fleece; modern RP final vowel in happy ɪ close-mid centralised unrounded vowel—RP sit j palatal approximant—RP you 241 List of phonetic symbols ɹ voiced alveolar approximant—RP row k voiceless velar plosive—RP car l voiced alveolar lateral approximant—RP lie ɫ voiced alveolar lateral approximant with velarisation—RP still m voiced bilabial nasal—RP man n voiced alveolar nasal—RP no ŋ voiced velar nasal—RP bring θ voiceless dental fricative—RP think p voiceless bilabial plosive—RP post s voiceless alveolar fricative—RP some ʃ voiceless palato-alveolar fricative—RP shoe t voiceless alveolar plosive—RP toe tʃ voiceless palato-alveolar affricate—RP choose u: close back rounded vowel—RP sue ʊ close-mid centralised rounded vowel—RP
    [Show full text]
  • Equivalences Between Different Phonetic Alphabets
    Equivalences between different phonetic alphabets by Carlos Daniel Hern´andezMena Description IPA Mexbet X-SAMPA IPA Symbol in LATEX Voiceless bilabial plosive p p p p Voiceless dental plosive” t t t d ntextsubbridgeftg Voiceless velar plosive k k k k Voiceless palatalized plosive kj k j k j kntextsuperscriptfjg Voiced bilabial plosive b b b b Voiced bilabial approximant B VB o ntextloweringfntextbetag fl Voiced dental plosive d” d d d ntextsubbridgefdg Voiced dental fricative flD DD o ntextloweringfntextipafn;Dgg Voiced velar plosive g g g g Voiced velar fricative Èfl GG o ntextloweringfntextbabygammag Voiceless palato-alveolar affricate t“S tS tS ntextroundcapftntexteshg Voiceless labiodental fricative f f f f Voiceless alveolar fricative s s s s Voiced alveolar fricative z z z z Voiceless dental fricative” s s [ s d ntextsubbridgefsg Voiced dental fricative” z z [ z d ntextsubbridgefzg Voiceless postalveolar fricative S SS ntextesh Voiceless velar fricative x x x x Voiced palatal fricative J Z jn ntextctj Voiced postalveolar affricate d“Z dZ dZ ntextroundcapfdntextyoghg Voiced bilabial nasal m m m m Voiced alveolar nasal n n n n Voiced labiodental nasal M MF ntextltailm Voiced dental nasal n” n [ n d ntextsubbridgefng Voiced palatalized nasal nj n j n j nntextsuperscriptfjg Voiced velarized nasal nÈ N n G nntextsuperscript fntextbabygammag Voiced palatal nasal ñ n∼ J ntextltailn Voiced alveolar lateral approximant l l l l Voiced dental lateral” l l [ l d ntextsubbridgeflg Voiced palatalized lateral lj l j l j lntextsuperscriptfjg Lowered
    [Show full text]
  • N. V. Tatsenko INTRODUCTION to THEORETICAL PHONETICS OF
    Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine Sumy State University N. V. Tatsenko INTRODUCTION TO THEORETICAL PHONETICS OF ENGLISH Study guide Recommended by the Academic Council of Sumy State University Sumy Sumy State University 2020 1 УДК 811.111’342(075.8) T 23 Reviewers: V. A. Ushchyna – DSc. (Philology), professor, head of Department of English Philology, Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University; V. H. Nikonova – DSc. (Philology), professor, head of Department of English and German Philology and Translation, Kyiv National Linguistic University Recommended for publication by the Academic Council of Sumy State University as a study guide (minutes № 2 of 07.09.2020) Tatsenko N. V. T 23 Introduction to Theoretical Phonetics of English : study guide / N. V. Tatsenko. – Sumy : Sumy State University, 2020. – 199 p. ISBN 987-966-657-835-1 The study guide contains educational material on the main topics of the course of theoretical phonetics of English: the sound structure of the language and the ways of its description and analysis; features of the modern pronunciation norm of English as a polyethnic formation and its national and regional variants; sounds of English as articulatory and functional units; syllable as a phonetic and phonological unit, word emphasis; prosodic arrangement of English language. Questions and practical tasks for each unit provide an opportunity for self-study of educational material. Meant for students, graduate students, teachers, and all interested in learning English. УДК 811.111’342(075.8) © Tatsenko N. V., 2020 ISBN 987-966-657-835-1 © Sumy State University, 2020 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS P. UNIT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit – I Language and Linguistics – Shs5006
    SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH UNIT – I LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS – SHS5006 UNIT-1 ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE Indo-European: Indo-European is just one of the language families, or proto- languages, from which the world's modern languages are descended, and there are many other families including Sino- Tibetan, North Caucasian, Afro-Asiatic, Altaic, Niger- Congo, Dravidian etc. The English language, and indeed most European languages, traces it original roots back to a Neolithic (late Stone Age) people known as the Indo- Europeans or Proto-Indo-Europeans, who lived in Eastern Europe and Central Asia Spread of Indo-European Languages Between 3500 BC and 2500 BC, the Indo-Europeans began to fan out across Europe and Asia, in search of new pastures and hunting grounds, and their languages developed - and diverged - in isolation. By around 1000 BC, the original Indo-European language had split into a dozen or more major language groups or families, the main groups being: Hellenic Italic Indo-Iranian Celtic Germanic Armenian Balto-Slavic Albanian GERMANIC The Germanic, or Proto-Germanic, language group can be traced back to the region between the Elbe river in modern Germany and southern Sweden some 3,000 years ago. The early Germanic languages themselves borrowed some words from the aboriginal (non-Indo-European) tribes which preceded them, particularly words for the natural environment (e.g. sea, land, strand, seal, herring); for technologies connected with sea travel (e.g. ship, keel, sail, oar); for new social practices (e.g. wife, bride, groom); and for farming or animal husbandry practices (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Icelandic Phonetic Transcription
    A Short Overview of the Icelandic Sound System Pronunciation Variants and Phonetic Transcription IPA Version Eiríkur Rögnvaldsson SÍM 2020 This document was written in December 2019 and January 2020 for the SÍM consortium as a part of the Icelandic National Language Technology Program. The document is made in two versions – one using the IPA transcription system and the other using the X-SAMPA transcription system. This is the IPA version. Both versions begin with a table showing the mappings between the two systems. The document is distributed under the CC BY 4.0 license. 2 1 An Overview of the Icelandic Sound System Icelandic speech sounds can be divided into two main groups; consonants and vowels. Icelandic consonants can be further divided into four classes: plosives (stops), fricatives (and approximants), nasals, and liquids (laterals and trills/taps). Within the vowel group, a further distinction can be made between monophthongs and diphthongs. The following table gives an overview of the phonemes of the Icelandic IPA and X- SAMPA symbol set, grouped by the phoneme classes to which they belong (according to the manner of their articulation). Consonants IPA SAMPA Orthography IPA SAMPA Gloss Plosives p p bera [pɛːra] /pE:ra/ ‘carry’ pʰ p_h pera [pʰɛːra] /p_hE:ra/ ‘pear’ t t dalur [taːlʏr] /ta:lYr/ ‘valley’ tʰ t_h tala [tʰaːla] /t_ha:la/ ‘talk’ c c gera [cɛːra] /cE:ra/ ‘do’ cʰ c_h kæla [cʰaiːla] /c_hai:la/ ‘cool off’ k k galdur [kaltʏr] /kaltYr/ ‘magic’ kʰ k_h kaldur [kʰaltʏr] /k_haltYr/ ‘cold’ Fricatives v v vera [vɛːra] /vE:ra/ ‘be’
    [Show full text]
  • Organised Phonology Data
    id11101609 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com ára OPD Risto Sarsa W Version 3.0, 3 December 2001 Organised Phonology Data ára Language [TCI] W Western Province Linguistic Classification (according to Wurm): Tonda Sub-Family, Morehead and Upper Maro Rivers Family, Trans-Fly Stock, Trans-New Guinea Phylum. Note: In the Tonda Sub-Family there is a dialect chain situation. Therefore, it is difficult ára language (as defined by to establish precise language boundaries. The W ’s Upper Peremka (Rouku) Language the present writer) comprises Wurm and, in part, Tonda Language Population estimate: 800 ékwa, Tékwa, Réku, Wámnefér, Ufaruwa Major Villages: Y Linguistic work done by: S.A. Wurm; SIL Data checked by: Risto Sarsa, March 2001 Data is based on 7 years of fieldwork. PHONEMIC AND ORTHOGRAPHIC INVENTORY (In parentheses: only in loan words) z ŋ ŋɡ۽ɑ æ (b) (d) e ə f (ɡ) i k (l) m mb n nd? nG / < a á (b) (d) e é f (g) i,y k (l) m mb n nd,nt nj, nts ng nḡ < A Á (B) (D) E É F (G) I,Y K (L) M Mb N Nd Nj Ng Nḡ / s u ʉ w j۽o ʌ œ (p) r s t? ð W o ó ô (p) r s t th ts u,w ú w y > O Ó Ô (P) R S T Th Ts U,W Ú W Y > Page 1 of 12 File: Wara (Convert'd)2 ára OPD Risto Sarsa W Version 3.0, 3 December 2001 CONSONANTS Simple Consonants Bilab LabDen Dent Alv PsAl Retr Pala Velr Uvlr Phar Glot Plosive W ݽ k Nasal m n ŋ Trill r Fricat f ð s j Approx Complex Consonants mb (prenasalised voiced bilabial stop) nd? (prenasalised voiced dental stop) ŋɡ (prenasalised voiced velar stop) (s (voiceless alveolar grooved affricate۽W (z (prenasalised voiced alveolar grooved affricate۽nG w (voiced labio-velar approximant) The phonemes / b / , / d / , / g / , / l / and / p / only occur in loan words.
    [Show full text]
  • LIN 3201 Sounds of Human Language Manual by Ratree
    LIN 3201 Sounds of Human Language Manual By Ratree Wayland Program in Linguistics University of Florida Gainesville, FL 2 Introduction There are approximately 7,000 languages in the world, and the sounds employed by these languages show both similarities and differences. Thus, an interesting question that one might ask is, “What factors affect the sounds a language can or cannot use?” First of all, we are constrained by what we can do with our tongue, our lips and other organs involved in the production of speech sounds. This factor may be referred to as the ‘articulatory ease’ factor. Secondly, we are constrained by what we can hear or what we can perceptually distinguish. This is the ‘auditory distinctiveness’ factor. Thus, no language in the world has sounds that are too difficult for native speakers to produce or to perceptually differentiate. To nonnative speakers, however, certain sounds may prove challenging to both produce and perceive. One of the goals of this course is to familiarize students with the various sounds employed in the world’s languages. Students will learn how to describe, produce and perceptually distinguish these sounds. Describing Speech Sounds Phonetics is concerned with describing speech sounds that occur in the world’s languages. Speech sounds can be described in at least two different ways. First we can describe them in terms of how they are made in the vocal tract (articulatory phonetics). As speech sounds leave the mouth, they cause disturbances in the surrounding air (sound waves). Thus, another way that we can describe speech sound is to analyze its acoustic sound wave (acoustic 3 phonetics).
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetics Presentation Your Name: Claire M-C Due Thursday, September 8Th Language: Comanche
    Phonetics presentation Your name: Claire M-C Due Thursday, September 8th Language: Comanche You’ll have 3 minutes to present the information here in class, and you should then turn this sheet in, or another document answering all the questions here. Feel free to print this and write your answers directly on the assignment itself, or you can write the answers on a separate sheet of paper. Remember to write clearly! Brief Background: Please give a little background on your language: Who speaks it? Where? What language family does it belong to? (a) Where is your language spoken? Please go into more detail than just the country or state. Comanche is spoken in central Oklahoma and central Texas. (b) How many speakers of your language are currently living? You can get this informa- tion from Ethnologue: https://www.ethnologue.com/ Less than 100, and decreasing. Most speakers are over 50. (c) What language family does your language belong to? What are some langauges that it is related to? Uto-Aztecan, closely related to Shoshoni, Mono, and Paiute. More distantly related to Nahuatl and Tepehuan. (d) BONUS: Provide a fun fact about the history, cultural significance, or political or social situation of your language During World Wars I and II, the US army employed Comanche speakers to send secret messages that could not be decoded by the enemy. 1 IPA chart: Please provide an IPA chart for the vowels, consonants, and any suprasegmentals in your language, modeled after the chart for English on pg. 359 of the textbook. Please include an example word from the language for each sound.
    [Show full text]
  • U·M·I University Microfilms International a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road
    Partial vowel harmonies as evidence for a Height Node. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wiswall, Wendy Jeanne Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 06:37:09 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185697 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedtbrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]