Investing in Innovation and Growth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CIAB Market & Policy Developments 2005/06
COAL INDUSTRY ADVISORY BOARD International Coal Policy Developments in 2012 OCTOBER 2012 Contents FOREWORD FROM THE CIAB CHAIRMAN 0 1 CIAB POLICY ADVICE 1 2 CIAB ACTIVITIES IN 2012 3 3 COAL IN WORLD ENERGY MARKETS 6 3.1 Overview 6 3.2 International Coal Trade 7 3.3 Regional Developments 9 4 POLICY DEVELOPMENTS 20 4.1 Overview 20 4.2 The Role of Coal 20 4.3 Climate Policy 23 4.4 Clean Coal Technologies 26 4.5 Coal Production 31 4.6 Coal Utilisation 38 5 CONCLUDING REMARKS 41 Author’s Notes: The report has been compiled on behalf of the CIAB by Brian Heath, CIAB Executive Co- ordinator, and thanks are due to the following CIAB Associates, on whose contributions it is substantially based: Peter Morris* Australian Coal Association Australia Maggi Rademacher* E.ON Kraftwerke Germany Supriatna Suhala Indonesian Coal Mining Assn. Indonesia Takenori Iwasaki J-Power Japan Jan-Kees Hordijk RWE Essent The Netherlands Ireneusz Pyka Central Mining Institute (GIG) Poland Sergey Tverdokhleb SUEK Russia Nikki Fisher* Anglo Operations South Africa Gina Downes ESKOM South Africa Mücella Ersoy TKI Turkey Ron Engleman Jr. Leonardo Technologies USA Veronika Kohler National Mining Association USA Skip Stephens Joy Mining USA Steve Winberg CONSOL Energy USA * These contributions are consolidated contributions from CIAB Associates in that country. The use of website links included in this report is subject to the Terms and Conditions set out in those websites. This report represents the personal views of the individual contributors and does not necessarily represent the views of their companies, organisations or of the IEA. -
Annals of UPET
ISSN 1454-9174 ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PETROSANI MINING ENGINEERING VOL. 9 (XXXVI) UNIVERSITAS PUBLISHING HOUSE PETROŞANI, 2008 ISSN 1454-9174 EDITOR OF PUBLICATION Prof.dr.eng. Ioan-Lucian BOLUNDUŢ ADVISORY AND EDITORIAL BOARD OF MINING ENGINEERING ISSUES ADVISORY BOARD Prof.dr.eng. Nicolae DIMA - University of Petroşani Prof.dr.hab.eng. Dr.h.c. Lev Alexandrovici PUCIKOV - Moscow State Mining University Russia Prof.dr.hab.eng. Suvalov Iuri VASILIEVICI - State Mining Institute – Sankt Petersburg - Russia Prof.dr.hab.eng. Monika HARDYGORA - Politechnika Wroclaw - Poland Prof.dr.hab.eng. Dr.h.c. Carsten DREBENSTEDT - Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg - Germania Assoc.Prof.dr.eng. Ventzislav IVANOV - University of Mining and Geology- Sofia - Bulgaria Prof.dr.eng. Jöszef BÖHM - University of Miskolc – Hungary Prof.dr.eng. Pavol RYBAR - Technical University-Kosice- Slovacia Prof.dr.eng. Dumitru FODOR - University of Petroşani Prof.dr.eng. Mircea GEORGESCU - University of Petroşani Prof.dr.eng. Vlad CODREA - University Babeş-Bolyai of Cluj Napoca Prof.dr.eng. Sanda KRAUSZ - University of Petroşani Assoc.prof.dr.eng. C-tin LUPU - INSEMEX of Petroşani EDITORIAL BOARD Editor-in-chief: Prof.dr.eng. Ilie ROTUNJANU - University of Petroşani Associate editors: Prof.dr.eng. Ioan DUMITRESCU - University of Petroşani Prof.dr.eng. Petru HODOR … - University of Petroşani Prof.dr.eng. C-tin SEMEN - University of Petroşani Prof.dr.eng. Romulus SÂRBU - University of Petroşani Prof.dr.eng. Eugen COZMA - University of Petroşani Editor Secretary: Lecturer dr. eng. Emilia DUNCA - University of Petroşani Editorial office address: University of Petroşani, 20 University Street, 332006, Petroşani, Roumania, Phone: (40)54/54.29.94, 54.25.80, 54.25.81, 54.25.82, 54.97.49, Fax: (40) 54/54.34.91, 54.62.38; www.upet.ro, Email: [email protected] Annals of the University of Petroşani, Mining Engineering, 9 (2008) 3 CONTENTS Page BARON M. -
The Socio-Economic Impacts of Advanced Technology Coal-Fuelled Power Stations
The Socio-economic Impacts of Advanced Technology Coal-Fuelled Power Stations Report by the Coal Industry Advisory Board The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views or policy of the International Energy Agency (IEA) Secretariat or of its individual member countries. The paper does not constitute advice on any specific issue or situation. The IEA makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, in respect of the paper’s content (including its completeness or accuracy) and shall not be responsible for any use of, or reliance on, the paper. Comments are welcome, directed to [email protected]. The Socio-economic Impacts of Advanced Technology Coal-Fuelled Power Stations Page | 1 Coal Industry Advisory Board The Coal Industry Advisory Board (CIAB) is a group of high-level executives from coal-related industrial enterprises, established by the IEA in 1979 to provide advice to the Secretariat on a wide range of issues relating to coal. The CIAB currently has around 35 members from 16 countries, contributing valuable experience in the fields of coal production, trading and transportation, electricity generation and other aspects of coal use. For more information about the Coal Industry Advisory Board, please contact Maggi Rademacher, CIAB Executive Co-ordinator ([email protected]). The Socio-economic Impacts of Advanced Technology Coal-Fuelled Power Stations Acknowledgements This report represents the 2014 Work Programme of the Coal Industry Advisory Board (CIAB) and was prepared for the CIAB by Charles River Associates (CRA), The Lantau Group (TLG) and KPMG with direct support from Peabody Energy, RWE and Shenhua. Page | 2 Christopher Russo of CRA was the project leader and instrumental in the development of the report. -
RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2011.Pdf
geschäFtsbericht 2011 finanzKalenDer 2012 /2013 2011 geschäftsbericht eCKDaten 2011 auf einen bliCK. RWE • Hohe Ergebnisbelastung durch beschleunigten Kernenergieausstieg in Deutschland 19. April 2012 Hauptversammlung • Betriebliches Ergebnis: 5,8 Mrd. € • Dividendenvorschlag: 2,00 € je Aktie 20. April 2012 Dividendenzahlung • Erste Maßnahmen zur Stärkung der Finanzkraft umgesetzt • Prognose 2012: Betriebliches Ergebnis trotz Desinvestitionen auf Vorjahreshöhe 10. Mai 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2012 RWE-Konzern 2011 2010 + /− in % 14. August 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2012 Außenabsatz Strom Mrd. kWh 294,6 311,2 − 5,3 Außenabsatz Gas Mrd. kWh 322,2 395,4 − 18,5 14. November 2012 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2012 Außenumsatz Mio. € 51.686 53.320 − 3,1 EBITDA Mio. € 8.460 10.256 − 17,5 5. März 2013 Bericht über das Geschäftsjahr 2012 Betriebliches Ergebnis Mio. € 5.814 7.681 − 24,3 Ergebnis vor Steuern Mio. € 3.024 4.978 − 39,3 18. April 2013 Hauptversammlung Nettoergebnis /Ergebnisanteile der Aktionäre der RWE AG Mio. € 1.806 3.308 − 45,4 Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis Mio. € 2.479 3.752 − 33,9 19. April 2013 Dividendenzahlung Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) % 10,9 14,4 - Kapitalkosten vor Steuern % 8,5 9,0 - 15. Mai 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2013 Wertbeitrag Mio. € 1.286 2.876 − 55,3 Betriebliches Vermögen (Capital Employed) Mio. € 53.279 53.386 − 0,2 14. August 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2013 Cash Flow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit Mio. € 5.510 5.500 0,2 Investitionen Mio. € 7.072 6.643 6,5 14. November 2013 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2013 In Sachanlagen und immaterielle Vermögenswerte Mio. -
Financial Statements of RWE AG 2012
2012Financial Statements of RWE AG FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RWE AG The financial statements and review of operations of RWE AG for the 2012 fiscal year are submitted to Bundesanzeiger Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Cologne, Germany, the operator of the electronic Bundesanzeiger (Federal Gazette), and published in the electronic Bundesanzeiger. The review of operations of RWE AG has been combined with the review of operations of the RWE Group and is published in our annual report on pages 31 to 101 and pages 111 to 117. Balance Sheet 2 Income Statement 3 Notes 3 Dividend Proposal 20 Responsibility Statement 21 List of Shareholdings (Part of the Notes) 22 Boards (Part of the Notes) 47 Auditor’s Report 51 Financial Calendar 52 Imprint 53 2 Balance Sheet Balance Sheet at 31 December 2012 Assets (Note) 31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011 € million Non-current assets (1) Financial assets 42,440 39,246 Current assets Accounts receivable and other assets (2) Accounts receivable from affiliated companies 9,039 7,719 Accounts receivable from investments 1 Other assets 121 141 Marketable securities (3) 351 2,357 Cash and cash equivalents (4) 1,404 697 10,916 10,914 Prepaid expenses (5) 465 73 Deferred tax assets (6) 2,221 2,761 56,042 52,994 Equity and liabilities (Note) 31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011 € million Equity (7) Subscribed capital Common shares 1,474 1,474 Preferred shares 100 100 1,574 1,574 Less nominal value of treasury shares − 1 Capital issued 1,574 1,573 Capital reserve 2,385 2,385 Retained earnings Other retained earnings 4,870 4,737 Distributable profit -
US Wind Industry Threatened by Tax Credit Withdrawal
THE ENERGY INDUSTRY March 2012 • Volume 5 • No 1 • Published monthly • ISSN 1757-7365 www.teitimes.com TIMES Renewable pursuits Smart response Final Word Minister Dr Farooq Abdullah The Energy Efficiency Directive can Junior Isles talks of explains why India’s renewable promote demand side management wind pains. targets are achievable. and help realise the smart grid. Page 13 Page 14 Page 16 News In Brief China faces import tariffs The trade dispute between China and the USA heats up as the US US wind industry government’s investigation draws to a conclusion. Page 4 NTPC ruling throws lifeline to flagging five-year plan India’s faltering 12th Five-Year threatened by Plan was given a boost after the National Thermal Power Company won a court order against a lawsuit challenging its tendering process. Page 6 tax credit French nuclear industry needs massive investment France will have to spend billions of euros to bring its nuclear energy fleet Martha Wyrsch urged up to tough new standards. an extension of the Page 8 withdrawal Production Tax Credit Germany accelerates FITs cuts Uncertainty surrounding support for With the withdrawal of a tax credit, the US wind industry is looking at a dramatic slowdown in renewable energy continued after the German government 2013. Junior Isles announced changes to its feed-in tariff scheme. The withdrawal of a tax credit for wind wind turbines. Vestas officials have power credit on behalf of Vestas “Wind energy has grown dramati- Page 9 power production at the end of the year been seeking a multi-year extension of American Wind Technology, which cally in the past several years, creating could result in massive layoffs and a the tax credit as a way to ensure future has four wind turbine plants in a manufacturing renaissance in the UNEP calls for sustainable delay or abandoning of projects. -
Successful Climate Protection Via Rapid Coal Phaseout in Germany and North Rhine-Westphalia
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Göke, Leonard et al. Article Successful climate protection via rapid coal phaseout in Germany and North Rhine-Westphalia DIW Weekly Report Provided in Cooperation with: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) Suggested Citation: Göke, Leonard et al. (2018) : Successful climate protection via rapid coal phaseout in Germany and North Rhine-Westphalia, DIW Weekly Report, ISSN 2568-7697, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin, Vol. 8, Iss. 33, pp. 301-311 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/182111 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen -
Gas Market Liberalization As a Key Driver of Change of the European Gas Market and Its Influence on the Strategies of the Main Players
CENTRE INTERNATIONAL DE FORMATION EUROPEENNE INSTITUT EUROPEEN DES HAUTES ETUDES INTERNATIONALES DIPLOME DES HAUTES ÉTUDES EUROPÉENNES ET INTERNATIONALES (D.H.E.E.I.) Trilingual Branch Gas market liberalization as a key driver of change of the European gas market and its influence on the strategies of the main players Master Thesis presented by: Roman Zyuzev Under the direction of: Nizar Ben Ayed, PhD Director DHEEI in charge of Anglophone branch Nice, May 2008 II Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................................. II ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................... V 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROBLEM FORM ULATION................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 OBJECTIVE AND STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER ................................................................................... 3 1.3 USEFUL THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND M ETHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING AND ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN GAS M ARKET AND STRATEGIES OF ITS PLAYERS ...................................................................... -
75 Jahre Dgmk
75 JAHRE DGMK 75 Jahre DGMK Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Erdöl, Erdgas und Kohle e. V. (1933–2008) Von B.-R. ALTMANN* Die DGMK Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Ge- – Gemeinschaftsforschung schaftler eingeladen. So wurde dann schon sellschaft für Erdöl, Erdgas und Kohle e. V. – die Zusammenarbeit mit dem DIN Deut- im September 1933 der Name der Gesell- feiert am 22./23. Mai 2008 am Ort ihrer sches Institut für Normung e. V. bei der schaft in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Mineral- Gründung in Berlin ihr 75jähriges Beste- Mineralöl- und Brennstoffnormung ölforschung (DGM) geändert. hen. – die Mitwirkung an der Bearbeitung ande- Auf der Gründungsveranstaltung, an der 75 Seit ihrer Gründung fördert die Gesellschaft rer Technischer Regelwerke Personen teilnahmen, wurde Prof. Dr. L. Ub- Wissenschaft, Forschung, Technik und Wei- – die Förderung von Qualitätssicherung belohde, Karlsruhe, zum Vorsitzenden ge- terbildung auf den Gebieten: und Arbeitssicherheit. wählt, neben ihm war Dipl.-Ing. Gottfried – Aufsuchung, Gewinnung und Speicherung Zur Historie der Deutschen Wissenschaftli- Feder, MDR, der politische Verbindungs- von Erdöl und Erdgas chen Gesellschaft für Erdöl, Erdgas und mann zur Reichsleitung der NSDAP. Weiter – Verarbeitung und Anwendung von Mine- Kohle e. V.(DGMK) liegen bereits fünf um- bestand der Vorstand aus Prof. W. Schulz, ralöl, Erdgas und ihren Folgeprodukten fangreiche Veröffentlichungen über 30, 40 Clausthal, (1. stellv. Vors.), Dipl.-Ing. Al- – Petrochemie und 50 Jahre DGMK vor [1–5]. Daher wird fred Wirth, Berlin (2. stellv. Vors.),Reg. Rat. – Kohlenveredlung und Weiterverarbeitung in der folgenden Zusammenstellung über Dipl.-Ing. W. Deutsch, Berlin (Schrift- und von Produkten. den Zeitraum der ersten 50 Jahre der Kassenführer) und Dr.-Ing. Oscar Zaepke, Mit fast 1.800 Mitgliedern verfolgt die DGMK gestrafft berichtet. -
Geschäftsbericht 2009 (PDF)
Falzmarke Falzmarke Falzmarke Falzmarke Geschäftsbericht 2009 FINANZKALENDER 2010/2011 2009 Geschäftsbericht GROSSES ECKDATEN 2009 AUF EINEN BLICK. RWE 22. April 2010 Hauptversammlung BEWEGEN. • Alle Ergebnisziele erreicht • Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis steigt um 5 % 23. April 2010 Dividendenzahlung • Akquisition des niederländischen Energieversorgers Essent Für unsere Kunden. • Dividendenvorschlag von 3,50 € je Aktie 12. Mai 2010 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2010 12. August 2010 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2010 RWE-Konzern 2009 2008 +/- in % Umsatz Mio. € 47.741 48.950 -2,5 11. November 2010 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2010 EBITDA Mio. € 9.165 8.773 4,5 Betriebliches Ergebnis Mio. € 7.090 6.826 3,9 24. Februar 2011 Bericht zum Geschäftsjahr 2010 Ergebnis fortgeführter Aktivitäten vor Steuern Mio. € 5.598 4.866 15,0 Nettoergebnis Mio. € 3.571 2.558 39,6 20. April 2011 Hauptversammlung Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis1 Mio. € 3.532 3.367 4,9 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) % 16,3 17,2 – 21. April 2011 Dividendenzahlung Kapitalkosten vor Steuern % 9,0 8,5 – Wertbeitrag Mio. € 3.177 3.453 -8,0 12. Mai 2011 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2011 Betrieblich gebundenes Vermögen (Capital Employed) Mio. € 43.597 39.809 9,5 Cash Flow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit Mio. € 5.299 8.853 -40,1 11. August 2011 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2011 Investitionen Mio. € 15.637 5.693 174,7 In Sachanlagen Mio. € 5.913 4.454 32,8 10. November 2011 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2011 In Finanzanlagen Mio. € 9.724 1.239 – Free Cash Flow Mio. € -614 4.399 – Zahl der in Umlauf befi ndlichen Aktien (gewichteter Durchschnitt) Tsd. -
Annual Report of RWE AG 2014
RWE ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ANNUAL REPORTANNUAL 2014 2014 KEY FIGURES AT A GLANCE • Operating result: €4.0 billion • Net income: €1.7 billion • Recurrent net income: €1.3 billion • Dividend proposal: €1 per share • Cash flows from operating activities: €5.6 billion RWE Group1 2014 2013 + /− % Electricity production billion kWh 208.3 218.2 − 4.5 External electricity sales volume billion kWh 258.3 270.9 − 4.7 External gas sales volume billion kWh 281.3 320.7 − 12.3 External revenue € million 48,468 52,425 − 7.5 EBITDA € million 7,131 7,904 − 9.8 Operating result € million 4,017 5,369 − 25.2 Income from continuing operations before tax € million 2,246 − 2,016 – Net income/RWE AG shareholders' share in income € million 1,704 − 2,757 – Recurrent net income € million 1,282 2,314 − 44.6 Return on capital employed (ROCE) % 8.4 10.6 – Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) before tax % 9.0 9.0 – Value added € million − 277 811 – Capital employed € million 47,711 50,646 − 5.8 Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations € million 5,556 4,803 15.7 Capital expenditure € million 3,440 3,978 − 13.5 Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets € million 3,245 3,848 − 15.7 Financial assets € million 195 130 50.0 Free cash flow € million 2,311 960 140.7 Number of shares outstanding (average) thousands 614,745 614,745 – Earnings per share € 2.77 − 4.49 – Recurrent net income per share € 2.09 3.76 − 44.4 Dividend per share € 1.002 1.00 – 31 Dec 2014 31 Dec 2013 Net debt of the RWE Group € million 31,010 30,727 0.9 Workforce3 59,784 64,896 − 7.9 1 See notes on reporting on page 41. -
G I S E L a T O U S S a I
G I S E L A T O U S S A I N T ATTORNEY – AT – LAW RAin G. Toussaint,Geigersbergstr.31, D - 76227 Karlsruhe, Germany Attorney-at-law The International Criminal Court Gisela Toussaint Office of the Prosecutor Geigersbergstr. 31 The Hon. Fatou Bensouda D - 76227 Karlsruhe-Durlach Oude Waalsdorperweg 10 Germany NL - 2597 AK, The Hague The Netherlands Tel.: 0049 (0)721 1838647 Fax: 0049 (0)721 1838841 26 September 2018 In the name of and by power of attorney of Ms. Marianne Grimmenstein-Balas, residing at Cornelius Strasse 11, D-58511 Lüdenscheid, Germany, as well as in the name of the undersigned, I respectfully submit to you for appropriate action a communication identifying crimes under International Law committed by: 1. The American Petroleum Institute (API) and all its member companies and all the Chief Executive Officers of these companies from 1946 to the present day 2. The Royal Dutch Shell Corporation and all its Chief Executive Officers from 1946 to the present day 3. Exxon (the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and all its Chief Executive Officers from 1946 till 1999 4. Mobil Oil (the Standard Oil Company of New York) and all its Chief Executive Officers from 1946 till 1999 5. The ExxonMobil Corporation and all its Chief Executive Officers from 1999 to the present day 6. The former United States Secretary of State and former Chief Executive Officer and President of ExxonMobil, Rex Tillerson 7. Vladimir Vladimorovich Putin, President of the Russian Federation 8. Rosneft and its Chief Executive Officer Igor Ivanovich Sechin 9.