DOCSLIB.ORG

International Ccs Technology Survey, Issue 5, July 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INTERNATIONAL CCS TECHNOLOGY SURVEY, ISSUE 5, JULY 2009 International CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) technology survey Report prepared for Gassnova by Innovation Norway. Issue 5 - July 2009. Contact: Per Christer Lund, IN Tokyo. [email protected], +81-3-3440-2611 INTERNATIONAL CCS TECHNOLOGY SURVEY, ISSUE 5, JULY 2009 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 CANADA AND USA 6 GERMANY 8 UK 11 FRANCE AND ITALY 12 JAPAN 14 AUSTRALIA 16 CHINA 19 CANADA AND USA 21 GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES 21 CURRENT CCS PROJECTS IN CANADA 37 CURRENT CCS PROJECTS IN US 42 CCS TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES IN CANADA 51 CCS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 51 BRAZIL 59 GERMANY 60 GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES 60 CURRENT CCS PROJECTS IN GERMANY 64 CCS TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES IN GERMANY 69 CCS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 70 UK 75 GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES 75 CCS PROJECTS IN UK 82 THE CCS INDUSTRY IN UK 90 USEFUL UK REFERENCES 92 FRANCE 94 GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES 94 CURRENT CCS PROJECTS IN FRANCE 94 CCS TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES IN FRANCE 96 ITALY 98 GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES 98 CCS TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND INSTITUTES IN ITALY 98 CCS INITIATIVES IN ITALY 99 THE NETHERLANDS 101 CCS PROJECTS IN THE NETHERLANDS 101 JAPAN 103 Page 3 of 144 INTERNATIONAL CCS TECHNOLOGY SURVEY, ISSUE 5, JULY 2009 GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES 103 CURRENT CCS PROJECTS IN JAPAN 107 CCS TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES IN JAPAN 112 CCS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 115 AUSTRALIA 118 GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES 118 CURRENT CCS PROJECTS IN AUSTRALIA 122 COMPANIES ENGAGED IN CCS ACTIVITIES IN AUSTRALIA 132 CCS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 134 CHINA 137 GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS AND STRATEGIES 137 PROJECTS IN CHINA 139 OTHER PROJECTS AND INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION 140 INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION. 143 OTHER REGIONS 145 ALGERIA 145 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 145 Page 4 of 144 INTERNATIONAL CCS TECHNOLOGY SURVEY, ISSUE 5, JULY 2009 Introduction This report is compiled by Innovation Norway as part of a joint project with Gassnova SF. The purpose is to maintain an updated overview of CCS projects and strategies around the world, and the report will be updated twice per year. This is the 5th version. The report is written by Innovation Norway “CCS task team” which consists of: Dr. Per Christer Lund (project manager)1, Tokyo Ms. Alana Prashad2, Toronto Ms. Teresa Völker3, Hamburg Dr. Pernille Holtedahl4, London Contributions have been given from other Innovation Norway international offices, and from various Norwegian embassy counsellors. The global survey is not complete, as it is covering only the following countries: USA, Canada, UK, Germany, Japan, Australia and China. There are significant CCS activities in other EU countries such as Netherlands, France and Eastern Europe, but they are not comprehensively covered in this version of the report and may not be fully up to date. The project scope is to collect information and compile a report from these regions addressing: Governmental programs and political ambitions related to CO2 management, especially CCS Public funding an programs dedicated for CCS research and demonstration projects Listing of current, completed and planned CCS projects Listing of main CCS technology companies and institutions Brief overview of CCS research organizations The methods used to collect and qualify information has been meetings and conversation with key persons with the CCS community in each region; combined with extensive data search in media and on Internet. The report is published at Gassnova’s web site: www.gassnova.no Disclaimer: Innovation Norway has to the extent possible under the scope of this project tried to verify the information obtained and presented in this report. However, errors, inconsistencies and incomplete information may occur since much of the information is obtained from conversations and public websites. Innovation Norway resumes no responsibility or liability for any damages resulting from such situations. 1 [email protected] . +81-3-3440-9929 2 alana.prashad@ innovationnorway.no +1 416-920-0434 3 Teresa.Volker@ innovationnorway.no +49 40 22 94 15 99 4 [email protected] +44 207 389 8805 Page 5 of 144 INTERNATIONAL CCS TECHNOLOGY SURVEY, ISSUE 5, JULY 2009 Executive Summary CANADA AND USA Governmental Programs and Strategies Canada Oil sands operations were once seen as a blight in the middle of Canada’s heartland, and seen as completely infeasible and totally dirty. The government as well as many private stakeholders have come up with plans to address cleaner upgrading (much bigger issue than just CO2), making permitting a simpler process and to strongly encourage new upgrader proposals to include CCS lest they be turned down. Environment Minister Jim Prentice says that CCS is not the answer to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from oil sands projects in northeastern Alberta. While Ottawa and Alberta are spending billions of dollars on CCS demonstration projects, the minister has acknowledged what critics have said all along: The technology has limited application at the energy-intensive mines and insitu projects that extract the bitumen from the ground. However, CCS could play a major role in virtually eliminating carbon dioxide emissions from upgraders that process the bitumen into synthetic crude oil, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of oil sands projects over all. The industry will have to rely mainly on other technologies to reduce emissions at the production sites. US The American election which saw Barak Obama elected was a strong vote for clean coal development. The regional sequestration partnerships continue to be an internationally impressive initiative and many of the partnerships have been granted funds to complete their phased projects. Once the new government takes shape and someone is appointed to run the Department of Energy, the agenda for CCS will become clear. The DOE is continuing with its breakthrough CO2 projects listed in previous installments of this report, and the IEA has just announced that it views the US/ Canada partnership program as the most aggressive in the world. This is excellent re-branding and public relations for the US after the Futuregen project was seen as a failure by many. Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission – Regulation update for US and Canada On September 26th, the IOGCC released a clear and comprehensive model for legal and regulatory framework for storage that should meet the unique requirements for each Canadian province and American state. The report recommends the provinces and states actively solicit public involvement as early as possible in the site selection process, and that the process remains as transparent as possible. It also stresses that CO2 is viewed in a manner that allows beneficial uses of CO2 following removal from regulated emission streams. Hydrogen sulphide, nitrogen oxide and sulphur oxide should remain highly regulated for public health, safety and environmental concerns. Public CCS funding and programs US DOE Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership has the following timeline: Characterization- 2003-2005 Validation 2005-2009 Deployment 2009-2017 During the validation phase, each partnership will focus on conducting small-scale field tests in different geographic regions and geologies. Deployment, planned to begin in 2009 will focus on implementing several large volume sequestration tests. Proposals include 25 geologic sequestration tests to be conducted, and between 1,000 and 525,000 ton of CO2 will be injected at each site. Plains CO2 Reduction Partnership (PCOR) The PCOR are developing CO2 sequestration opportunities for the central interior of North America. PCOR includes 50 partners from industry, government and NGOs (Non-Governmental Organization). PCOR is involved in Page 6 of 144 INTERNATIONAL CCS TECHNOLOGY SURVEY, ISSUE 5, JULY 2009 sequestration issues and is one of 7 regional partnerships that the US DOE and the NETL established to assess carbon sequestration opportunities that exist in the United States and Canada. PCOR efforts support the president’s global climate change initiative, which seeks to reduce CO2 intensity in the US by 18% by 2012. US DOE’s Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI) - Round 3 The United States Department of Energy’s CCPI has invited private industry to partner with government to demonstrate new clean coal tech at a commercial scale at the beginning of October. This has been released for public comment. Public comment begins immediately in November. The CCPI is a ten-year $2 billion project initiated in 2002 in response to the Bush administration’s support for clean-coal technology to demonstrate advanced coal-based power generation technology at the commercial scale. The DOE is seeking new and innovative technologies rather than new applications or minor improvements to existing technology. Potential projects must ensure a minimum of 75% fuel energy input from coal, and a minimum 50% of energy-equivalent output is from electricity. Current CCS Projects The Canadian CO2 Capture and Storage Technology Network (CCCSTN) lists 48 Canadian projects related to CCS; including pre- and post-combustion capture; oxy-fuel combustion and storage (injection, reliability and assessment). Most of these are studies and analysis, and only a few are large-scale demonstration projects relevant for this report. The following are the significant demonstration projects for CCS in North America. The International Test Centre
Recommended publications
  • Northumberland Bates Site, Blyth Local Development Order

    Northumberland Bates Site, Blyth Local Development Order

    Northumberland Bates Site, Blyth Local Development Order February 2013 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 The Bates Site 5 3 Statement of Reasons 9 4 The Local Development Order 14 5 LDO Conformity Process 25 6 Definitions 27 Appendices 1 (Schedule 1) LDO site boundary plan 29 2 Submission Form and Commencement Notice 31 3 Appendix 3 - Other consents 32 4 LDO Monitoring 34 Contact details 36 Local Development Order: Bates Site - ADOPTED 1. Introduction 1. Introduction Introduction 1.1 This document is a Local Development Order (hereinafter referred to as LDO) and has been produced by Northumberland County Council in partnership with Arch, the Northumberland Development Company.(1) 1.2 In developing the Order, site information has been collated; assessments have been undertaken; and advice has been sought from key consultees. Further information is available in the following documents, which should be read alongside this LDO. Local Development Order Guide – providing background and supplementary guidance Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion – this relates to legislative requirements and serves to demonstrate that the development permitted by the LDO does not have significant effects on the environment. Nature Conservation and Ecological Assessment – this comprises a number of assessments and relates to various legislative requirements, including in respect of protected habitats and species. Sustainability Appraisal Report – this reports on the testing of environmental, social and economic impacts of the LDO. 1.3 The draft LDO and associated documents identified above were subject to extensive consultation. The consultation was undertaken in accordance with the values of the Statement of Community Involvement(2) and exceeded statutory requirements(3).
  • RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2011.Pdf

    RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2011.Pdf

    geschäFtsbericht 2011 finanzKalenDer 2012 /2013 2011 geschäftsbericht eCKDaten 2011 auf einen bliCK. RWE • Hohe Ergebnisbelastung durch beschleunigten Kernenergieausstieg in Deutschland 19. April 2012 Hauptversammlung • Betriebliches Ergebnis: 5,8 Mrd. € • Dividendenvorschlag: 2,00 € je Aktie 20. April 2012 Dividendenzahlung • Erste Maßnahmen zur Stärkung der Finanzkraft umgesetzt • Prognose 2012: Betriebliches Ergebnis trotz Desinvestitionen auf Vorjahreshöhe 10. Mai 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2012 RWE-Konzern 2011 2010 + /− in % 14. August 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2012 Außenabsatz Strom Mrd. kWh 294,6 311,2 − 5,3 Außenabsatz Gas Mrd. kWh 322,2 395,4 − 18,5 14. November 2012 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2012 Außenumsatz Mio. € 51.686 53.320 − 3,1 EBITDA Mio. € 8.460 10.256 − 17,5 5. März 2013 Bericht über das Geschäftsjahr 2012 Betriebliches Ergebnis Mio. € 5.814 7.681 − 24,3 Ergebnis vor Steuern Mio. € 3.024 4.978 − 39,3 18. April 2013 Hauptversammlung Nettoergebnis /Ergebnisanteile der Aktionäre der RWE AG Mio. € 1.806 3.308 − 45,4 Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis Mio. € 2.479 3.752 − 33,9 19. April 2013 Dividendenzahlung Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) % 10,9 14,4 - Kapitalkosten vor Steuern % 8,5 9,0 - 15. Mai 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2013 Wertbeitrag Mio. € 1.286 2.876 − 55,3 Betriebliches Vermögen (Capital Employed) Mio. € 53.279 53.386 − 0,2 14. August 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2013 Cash Flow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit Mio. € 5.510 5.500 0,2 Investitionen Mio. € 7.072 6.643 6,5 14. November 2013 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2013 In Sachanlagen und immaterielle Vermögenswerte Mio.
  • Financial Statements of RWE AG 2012

    Financial Statements of RWE AG 2012

    2012Financial Statements of RWE AG FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RWE AG The financial statements and review of operations of RWE AG for the 2012 fiscal year are submitted to Bundesanzeiger Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Cologne, Germany, the operator of the electronic Bundesanzeiger (Federal Gazette), and published in the electronic Bundesanzeiger. The review of operations of RWE AG has been combined with the review of operations of the RWE Group and is published in our annual report on pages 31 to 101 and pages 111 to 117. Balance Sheet 2 Income Statement 3 Notes 3 Dividend Proposal 20 Responsibility Statement 21 List of Shareholdings (Part of the Notes) 22 Boards (Part of the Notes) 47 Auditor’s Report 51 Financial Calendar 52 Imprint 53 2 Balance Sheet Balance Sheet at 31 December 2012 Assets (Note) 31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011 € million Non-current assets (1) Financial assets 42,440 39,246 Current assets Accounts receivable and other assets (2) Accounts receivable from affiliated companies 9,039 7,719 Accounts receivable from investments 1 Other assets 121 141 Marketable securities (3) 351 2,357 Cash and cash equivalents (4) 1,404 697 10,916 10,914 Prepaid expenses (5) 465 73 Deferred tax assets (6) 2,221 2,761 56,042 52,994 Equity and liabilities (Note) 31 Dec 2012 31 Dec 2011 € million Equity (7) Subscribed capital Common shares 1,474 1,474 Preferred shares 100 100 1,574 1,574 Less nominal value of treasury shares − 1 Capital issued 1,574 1,573 Capital reserve 2,385 2,385 Retained earnings Other retained earnings 4,870 4,737 Distributable profit
  • Distribution Network Review

    Distribution Network Review

    A DISTRIBUTION NETWORK REVIEW ETSU K/EL/00188/REP Contractor P B Power Merz & McLellan Division PREPARED BY R J Fairbairn D Maunder P Kenyon The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry.__________ First published 1999 © Crown copyright 1999 Page iii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1.1 2. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................2.1 3. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Description of the existing electricity supply system in England , Scotland and Wales ...3.1 3.2 Summary of PES Licence conditions relating to the connection of embedded generation 3.5 3.3 Summary of conditions required to be met by an embedded generator .................................3.10 3.4 The effect of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA)..............................3.11 4. THE ABILITY OF THE UK DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS TO ACCEPT EMBEDDED GENERATION...................................................................................................................................................4.1
  • US Wind Industry Threatened by Tax Credit Withdrawal

    US Wind Industry Threatened by Tax Credit Withdrawal

    THE ENERGY INDUSTRY March 2012 • Volume 5 • No 1 • Published monthly • ISSN 1757-7365 www.teitimes.com TIMES Renewable pursuits Smart response Final Word Minister Dr Farooq Abdullah The Energy Efficiency Directive can Junior Isles talks of explains why India’s renewable promote demand side management wind pains. targets are achievable. and help realise the smart grid. Page 13 Page 14 Page 16 News In Brief China faces import tariffs The trade dispute between China and the USA heats up as the US US wind industry government’s investigation draws to a conclusion. Page 4 NTPC ruling throws lifeline to flagging five-year plan India’s faltering 12th Five-Year threatened by Plan was given a boost after the National Thermal Power Company won a court order against a lawsuit challenging its tendering process. Page 6 tax credit French nuclear industry needs massive investment France will have to spend billions of euros to bring its nuclear energy fleet Martha Wyrsch urged up to tough new standards. an extension of the Page 8 withdrawal Production Tax Credit Germany accelerates FITs cuts Uncertainty surrounding support for With the withdrawal of a tax credit, the US wind industry is looking at a dramatic slowdown in renewable energy continued after the German government 2013. Junior Isles announced changes to its feed-in tariff scheme. The withdrawal of a tax credit for wind wind turbines. Vestas officials have power credit on behalf of Vestas “Wind energy has grown dramati- Page 9 power production at the end of the year been seeking a multi-year extension of American Wind Technology, which cally in the past several years, creating could result in massive layoffs and a the tax credit as a way to ensure future has four wind turbine plants in a manufacturing renaissance in the UNEP calls for sustainable delay or abandoning of projects.
  • Northeast England – a History of Flash Flooding

    Northeast England – a History of Flash Flooding

    Northeast England – A history of flash flooding Introduction The main outcome of this review is a description of the extent of flooding during the major flash floods that have occurred over the period from the mid seventeenth century mainly from intense rainfall (many major storms with high totals but prolonged rainfall or thaw of melting snow have been omitted). This is presented as a flood chronicle with a summary description of each event. Sources of Information Descriptive information is contained in newspaper reports, diaries and further back in time, from Quarter Sessions bridge accounts and ecclesiastical records. The initial source for this study has been from Land of Singing Waters –Rivers and Great floods of Northumbria by the author of this chronology. This is supplemented by material from a card index set up during the research for Land of Singing Waters but which was not used in the book. The information in this book has in turn been taken from a variety of sources including newspaper accounts. A further search through newspaper records has been carried out using the British Newspaper Archive. This is a searchable archive with respect to key words where all occurrences of these words can be viewed. The search can be restricted by newspaper, by county, by region or for the whole of the UK. The search can also be restricted by decade, year and month. The full newspaper archive for northeast England has been searched year by year for occurrences of the words ‘flood’ and ‘thunder’. It was considered that occurrences of these words would identify any floods which might result from heavy rainfall.
  • North East England Annual Aggregates Monitoring Report 2013

    North East England Annual Aggregates Monitoring Report 2013

    North East England Annual Aggregates Monitoring Report 2013 Published December 2014 North East Aggregates Working Party County Durham │Northumberland │Tees Valley │Tyne and Wear North East Aggregates Working Party Annual Aggregates Monitoring Report 2013 Published December 2014 Published by Northumberland County Council on behalf of the North East Aggregates Working Party For further information on this document and the North East Aggregates Working Party, please contact: Kevin Tipple Secretary to the North East Aggregates Working Party Northumberland County Council Planning and Housing Services County Hall Morpeth Northumberland NE61 2EF Telephone: 01670 623631 Email: [email protected] Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... ii Main report 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 2. Planning policy context .......................................................................................... 4 3. Production and reserves of primary aggregates: Crushed rock ............................ 6 4. Production and reserves of primary aggregates: land won sand and gravel ....... 14 5. Production of primary aggregates: Marine sand and gravel ................................ 21 6. Recycled and secondary aggregates .................................................................. 25 7. Development Plans ............................................................................................
  • Gas Market Liberalization As a Key Driver of Change of the European Gas Market and Its Influence on the Strategies of the Main Players

    Gas Market Liberalization As a Key Driver of Change of the European Gas Market and Its Influence on the Strategies of the Main Players

    CENTRE INTERNATIONAL DE FORMATION EUROPEENNE INSTITUT EUROPEEN DES HAUTES ETUDES INTERNATIONALES DIPLOME DES HAUTES ÉTUDES EUROPÉENNES ET INTERNATIONALES (D.H.E.E.I.) Trilingual Branch Gas market liberalization as a key driver of change of the European gas market and its influence on the strategies of the main players Master Thesis presented by: Roman Zyuzev Under the direction of: Nizar Ben Ayed, PhD Director DHEEI in charge of Anglophone branch Nice, May 2008 II Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................................. II ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................................................IV LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................... V 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROBLEM FORM ULATION................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 OBJECTIVE AND STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER ................................................................................... 3 1.3 USEFUL THEORETICAL APPROACHES AND M ETHODS FOR UNDERSTANDING AND ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN GAS M ARKET AND STRATEGIES OF ITS PLAYERS ......................................................................
  • Port of Blyth Annual Review 2016

    Port of Blyth Annual Review 2016

    Port of Blyth Annual Review 2016 portofblyth.co.uk 1 www.portofblyth.co.uk Cover image courtesy of Flypro-UK Ltd CONTENTS CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT 4 MARINE 14 TRAINING & SAFETY 22 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW 6 ENVIRONMENT 16 FORWARDING & LOGISTICS 24 PORT OVERVIEW & STATUTE 8 PORT OPERATIONS 18 STAKEHOLDERS & THE COMMUNITY 26 FINANCE 12 PORT DEVELOPMENT 20 THE FUTURE 30 2 www.portofblyth.co.uk Annual Review 2016 3 CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT It is extremely pleasing to Group turnover exceeded £23 million for the first time, with a placed to deliver an on-going positive contribution to become an important regional asset providing healthy operating profit of £2.11 million and pre-tax profit of £1.88 the Group. training, research and leisure opportunities together announce another record year for million. A significant increase in EBITDA to £3.66 million will also with a high quality seafood restaurant. the Port in 2016 with a significant help to support our ambitious plans for further investment and As a Trust, the Port does of course provide benefits increase in both turnover and expansion. to a wider range of stakeholders and I am pleased We have worked closely with a number of regional to see a number of community focussed initiatives partners on all of these initiatives and their on-going profitability. This following on from This continued growth is set against increasingly challenging global delivered in 2016. The highest profile event was support is greatly appreciated. record performance in 2015 and trading conditions which makes such achievements all the more undoubtedly the North Sea Tall Ships Regatta in commendable.
  • 75 Jahre Dgmk

    75 Jahre Dgmk

    75 JAHRE DGMK 75 Jahre DGMK Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Erdöl, Erdgas und Kohle e. V. (1933–2008) Von B.-R. ALTMANN* Die DGMK Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Ge- – Gemeinschaftsforschung schaftler eingeladen. So wurde dann schon sellschaft für Erdöl, Erdgas und Kohle e. V. – die Zusammenarbeit mit dem DIN Deut- im September 1933 der Name der Gesell- feiert am 22./23. Mai 2008 am Ort ihrer sches Institut für Normung e. V. bei der schaft in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Mineral- Gründung in Berlin ihr 75jähriges Beste- Mineralöl- und Brennstoffnormung ölforschung (DGM) geändert. hen. – die Mitwirkung an der Bearbeitung ande- Auf der Gründungsveranstaltung, an der 75 Seit ihrer Gründung fördert die Gesellschaft rer Technischer Regelwerke Personen teilnahmen, wurde Prof. Dr. L. Ub- Wissenschaft, Forschung, Technik und Wei- – die Förderung von Qualitätssicherung belohde, Karlsruhe, zum Vorsitzenden ge- terbildung auf den Gebieten: und Arbeitssicherheit. wählt, neben ihm war Dipl.-Ing. Gottfried – Aufsuchung, Gewinnung und Speicherung Zur Historie der Deutschen Wissenschaftli- Feder, MDR, der politische Verbindungs- von Erdöl und Erdgas chen Gesellschaft für Erdöl, Erdgas und mann zur Reichsleitung der NSDAP. Weiter – Verarbeitung und Anwendung von Mine- Kohle e. V.(DGMK) liegen bereits fünf um- bestand der Vorstand aus Prof. W. Schulz, ralöl, Erdgas und ihren Folgeprodukten fangreiche Veröffentlichungen über 30, 40 Clausthal, (1. stellv. Vors.), Dipl.-Ing. Al- – Petrochemie und 50 Jahre DGMK vor [1–5]. Daher wird fred Wirth, Berlin (2. stellv. Vors.),Reg. Rat. – Kohlenveredlung und Weiterverarbeitung in der folgenden Zusammenstellung über Dipl.-Ing. W. Deutsch, Berlin (Schrift- und von Produkten. den Zeitraum der ersten 50 Jahre der Kassenführer) und Dr.-Ing. Oscar Zaepke, Mit fast 1.800 Mitgliedern verfolgt die DGMK gestrafft berichtet.
  • Geschäftsbericht 2009 (PDF)

    Geschäftsbericht 2009 (PDF)

    Falzmarke Falzmarke Falzmarke Falzmarke Geschäftsbericht 2009 FINANZKALENDER 2010/2011 2009 Geschäftsbericht GROSSES ECKDATEN 2009 AUF EINEN BLICK. RWE 22. April 2010 Hauptversammlung BEWEGEN. • Alle Ergebnisziele erreicht • Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis steigt um 5 % 23. April 2010 Dividendenzahlung • Akquisition des niederländischen Energieversorgers Essent Für unsere Kunden. • Dividendenvorschlag von 3,50 € je Aktie 12. Mai 2010 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2010 12. August 2010 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2010 RWE-Konzern 2009 2008 +/- in % Umsatz Mio. € 47.741 48.950 -2,5 11. November 2010 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2010 EBITDA Mio. € 9.165 8.773 4,5 Betriebliches Ergebnis Mio. € 7.090 6.826 3,9 24. Februar 2011 Bericht zum Geschäftsjahr 2010 Ergebnis fortgeführter Aktivitäten vor Steuern Mio. € 5.598 4.866 15,0 Nettoergebnis Mio. € 3.571 2.558 39,6 20. April 2011 Hauptversammlung Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis1 Mio. € 3.532 3.367 4,9 Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) % 16,3 17,2 – 21. April 2011 Dividendenzahlung Kapitalkosten vor Steuern % 9,0 8,5 – Wertbeitrag Mio. € 3.177 3.453 -8,0 12. Mai 2011 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2011 Betrieblich gebundenes Vermögen (Capital Employed) Mio. € 43.597 39.809 9,5 Cash Flow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit Mio. € 5.299 8.853 -40,1 11. August 2011 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2011 Investitionen Mio. € 15.637 5.693 174,7 In Sachanlagen Mio. € 5.913 4.454 32,8 10. November 2011 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2011 In Finanzanlagen Mio. € 9.724 1.239 – Free Cash Flow Mio. € -614 4.399 – Zahl der in Umlauf befi ndlichen Aktien (gewichteter Durchschnitt) Tsd.
  • Annual Report of RWE AG 2014

    Annual Report of RWE AG 2014

    RWE ANNUAL REPORT 2014 ANNUAL REPORTANNUAL 2014 2014 KEY FIGURES AT A GLANCE • Operating result: €4.0 billion • Net income: €1.7 billion • Recurrent net income: €1.3 billion • Dividend proposal: €1 per share • Cash flows from operating activities: €5.6 billion RWE Group1 2014 2013 + /− % Electricity production billion kWh 208.3 218.2 − 4.5 External electricity sales volume billion kWh 258.3 270.9 − 4.7 External gas sales volume billion kWh 281.3 320.7 − 12.3 External revenue € million 48,468 52,425 − 7.5 EBITDA € million 7,131 7,904 − 9.8 Operating result € million 4,017 5,369 − 25.2 Income from continuing operations before tax € million 2,246 − 2,016 – Net income/RWE AG shareholders' share in income € million 1,704 − 2,757 – Recurrent net income € million 1,282 2,314 − 44.6 Return on capital employed (ROCE) % 8.4 10.6 – Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) before tax % 9.0 9.0 – Value added € million − 277 811 – Capital employed € million 47,711 50,646 − 5.8 Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations € million 5,556 4,803 15.7 Capital expenditure € million 3,440 3,978 − 13.5 Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets € million 3,245 3,848 − 15.7 Financial assets € million 195 130 50.0 Free cash flow € million 2,311 960 140.7 Number of shares outstanding (average) thousands 614,745 614,745 – Earnings per share € 2.77 − 4.49 – Recurrent net income per share € 2.09 3.76 − 44.4 Dividend per share € 1.002 1.00 – 31 Dec 2014 31 Dec 2013 Net debt of the RWE Group € million 31,010 30,727 0.9 Workforce3 59,784 64,896 − 7.9 1 See notes on reporting on page 41.