Ingham of Arabia Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ingham of Arabia Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics Ingham of Arabia Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics Editorial board Aaron D. Rubin and C.H.M. Versteegh VOLUME 69 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ssl Ingham of Arabia A Collection of Articles Presented as a Tribute to the Career of Bruce Ingham Edited by Clive Holes and Rudolf de Jong LEIDEn • BOSTON 2013 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ingham of Arabia : a collection of articles presented as a tribute to the career of Bruce Ingham / edited by Clive Holes and Rudolf de Jong. pages cm. — (Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics ; 69) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-90-04-25617-0 (hardback : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-90-04-25619-4 (e-book) 1. Arabic language—Dialects. 2. Sociolinguistics—Arab countries. I. Holes, Clive, 1948– editor of compilation. II. Jong, Rudolf de editor of compilation. III. Ingham, Bruce honouree. PJ6709.I54 2013 492.7’7—dc23 2013021421 This publication has been typeset in the multilingual “Brill” typeface. With over 5,100 characters covering Latin, IPA, Greek, and Cyrillic, this typeface is especially suitable for use in the humanities. For more information, please see www.brill.com/brill-typeface. ISSN 0081-8461 ISBN 978-90-04-25617-0 (hardback) ISBN 978-90-04-25619-4 (e-book) Copyright 2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Global Oriental, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers and Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. This book is printed on acid-free paper. CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................................................ vii Bibliography Bruce Ingham ......................................................................... xi About Bedouin Tents and other Tents, or “Tent Terminology as an Example of Semantic Shift” ......................................................... 1 Peter Behnstedt and Manfred Woidich Tense and Aspect in Semitic: A Case Study Based on the Arabic of the Omani Šarqiyya and the Mehri of Dhofar ............................. 23 Domenyk Eades and Janet C.E. Watson From Phonological Variation to Grammatical Change: Depalatalisation of /č/ in Salti ............................................................... 55 Bruno Herin and Enam Al-Wer Representation of Women’s Language in Negev Bedouin Men’s Texts .................................................................................................. 75 Roni Henkin An Arabic Text from Ṣūr, Oman ................................................................ 87 Clive Holes Grammaticalizations Based on the Verb kāna in Arabic Dialects ............................................................................................ 109 Otto Jastrow Texts in Sinai Bedouin Dialects .................................................................. 119 Rudolf de Jong Lexical Notes on the Dialect of Mayadin (Eastern Syria) in the Late 1970s, with Jean Cantineau’s Fieldnotes of 1935 ........ 151 Jérôme Lentin vi contents Chapter 504 and Modern Arabic Dialectology: What are Kaškaša and Kaskasa, Really? ................................................................................. 173 Jonathan Owens Interesting Facts on Ancient Mounds—Three Texts in the Bedouin Arabic Dialect of the Harran-Urfa Region (Southeastern Turkey) .............................................................................. 203 Stephan Procházka Antigemination as Morphosemantic Integrity in Arabic Dialects ............................................................................................ 215 Kirsty Rowan Index ................................................................................................................... 233 PREFACE Ingham of Arabia brings together contributions from many researchers in the world of Arabic dialectology and sociolinguistics who wish to cel- ebrate the career of our dear colleague and friend Bruce Ingham on the occasion of his retirement from full-time academic life. Like Premiership footballers who spend their careers at one club, Bruce is a rarity: he spent his entire academic life at the School of Oriental and African Studies of the University of London. A Londoner by birth, he was admitted to SOAS in 1961 as an undergraduate to read for a degree in Arabic and Persian, and then became successively a Lecturer (whilst still a doctoral research student), and finally a full Professor—all in that same leafy corner of Bloomsbury near the British Museum. For many years now, he has been a dominant figure in British and European Arabic dialectology, and a worthy successor to his late, and much-lamented teacher Tom Johnstone, one of the pioneers of modern Arabian dialectology and the study of the Modern South Arabian languages. Bruce began his research career with a series of articles in the ‘house journal’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. Two of these, published in 1973 and 1976, were on the Arabic dialects of southern Iraq and Khuzistan, based on the PhD field-work he had done there. At this point, southern Iraq was still largely terra incognita to Arabic dialectol- ogy. Bruce’s presentation and linguistic terminology (e.g. ‘verbal piece’) immediately marked him as a product of the Firthian ‘London School of Linguistics’, which also produced such luminaries as Michael Halliday. But these two articles were much more than a young research student’s mechanical application of someone else’s method: they were among the first pieces of dialectological research in Arabic to build life-style factors fully into the description, with the differentiation of ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ dia- lect types, foreshadowing much of his later (and others’) work on Arabia and the Gulf. These early articles were followed by studies of the dia- lect of the Mutayr tribe of Kuwait (1979) and a sketch of Najdi Arabic in Fischer and Jastrow’s Arabic dialectology reader (1980), which pointed to the direction in which Bruce’s research would go geographically—Central Arabia. His first full-length book was North-East Arabian Dialects, published by KPI in 1982. This beautifully written early study, a model of concision, viii preface clarity, and economy of statement, interweaves the threads which would mark Bruce’s later work—a deep understanding of the cycles of Arabian tribal population movements over time; an ability to record dialect usage with meticulous accuracy, but at the same time see beyond the fine details of synchronic language data to the diachronic dynamics of sociolinguistic change which underlay them; and an ethnographer’s love of oral culture, which in Arabia is such a rich repository of local history, tribal lore and verbal art. It is one of those books which when you put it down (but then return to again and again) you say to yourself ‘I wish I’d written that’. A string of substantial articles followed throughout the 1980s and 90s: on the dialect of the Dhafir of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia (1982); the dialect of the Al Murra of southern Najd and Qatar (1986); Bedouin camel termi- nology (1990); Khuzistani Arabic (1991); subordinate clauses in Bedouin dialects (1991); the sālfa as a narrative genre (1993); Afghanistan Arabic (1994); the dialect of the Rwala of northern Arabia (1995); and a series of articles on Bedouin dress. In 1997, Ithaca published in book form a useful, edited collection of some of these articles under the title Arabian Diver- sions. There were also, in this period, two substantial books. The first, Bedouin of Northern Arabia: traditions of the Dhafir (1986), included much tribal history and dialect poetry of this major north Arabian tribe, and it was later translated into Arabic and published in Kuwait; the second was a short but magisterial study on the dialects of central Arabia, Najdi Arabic (1994). This latter work bears witness to Bruce’s deep understand- ing of how Najdi Arabic works as a language system at all levels of analy- sis. And lest we are persuaded by the seemingly endless studies of easily accessible modern urban dialects like Cairene into thinking that all Arabic dialects are developing like European languages, Najdi Arabic lays bare the structures of a variety of Arabic that has developed, particularly in its treatment of tense, aspect and Aktionsart, in a direction different from the Arabic vernaculars of the eastern Mediterranean. It can be seen from this (abbreviated) list that by the mid-90s Bruce’s interests had begun to range widely over material culture, ethnography, and poetry as well as his first love, language. But his next move was in a totally unexpected direction: the Indian languages of North America! Beginning in the mid-1990s, Bruce published half-a-dozen academic papers on the Lakota language of North and South Dakota in the USA, estimated to be spoken by 20,000 Sioux Indians. In 2001, he published an English- Lakota dictionary of 285 pages and 12,000 entries. The book was launched at the American embassy in London. Bruce was also presented with a star
Recommended publications
  • Delateralisation in Arabic and Mehri
    Dialectologia 23 (2019), 1-23. ISSN: 2013-2247 Received 22 May 2017. Accepted 3 October 2017. DELATERALISATION IN ARABIC AND MEHRI Munira Al-AZRAQI Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia** [email protected] Abstract The Arabic lateral ḍ was considered extinct. However, it was found lately in use in some Arabic dialects such as RiJāl Almaʕ in southwest Saudi Arabia and in some varieties of the Mehri language. Nevertheless, delateralisation is apparent. To assess the extent of delateralisation, this study investigates the current usage of the lateral *ḍ among RiJāl Almaʕ speakers in Abha city, southwest Saudi Arabia and Mehri speakers in Dammam, east Saudi Arabia. 74 speakers, 38 speakers of RiJāl Almaʕ in Abha city and 36 Mehri speakers in Dammam city, participated in this study. Their age ranges from 15 to 75 years old. The data comprises almost 56 hours of audio recording captured during informal interviews. The findings show that there is a delateralisation occurring among some younger and educated speakers of Mehri and RiJāl Almaʕ. Keywords delateralisation, Arabic, Mehri, RiJāl Almaʕ DESLATERALIZACIÓN EN ÁRABE Y EN MEHRI Resumen La ḍ lateral árabe se consideraba extinguida. Sin embargo, últimamente se ha constatado su uso en algunos dialectos árabes como RiJāl Almaʕ en el suroeste de Arabia Saudita y en algunas variedades de la lengua Mehri. Con todo, la deslateralización es aparente. Para evaluar el alcance de la deslateralización, este estudio investiga el uso actual de la lateral *ḍ entre los hablantes de RiJāl Almaʕ en la ciudad de Abha, situada al suroeste de Arabia Saudita, y entre los hablantes de Mehri en Dammam, al este de Arabia Saudita.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical and Modern Standard Arabic Marijn Van Putten University of Leiden
    Chapter 3 Classical and Modern Standard Arabic Marijn van Putten University of Leiden The highly archaic Classical Arabic language and its modern iteration Modern Standard Arabic must to a large extent be seen as highly artificial archaizing reg- isters that are the High variety of a diglossic situation. The contact phenomena found in Classical Arabic and Modern Standard Arabic are therefore often the re- sult of imposition. Cases of borrowing are significantly rarer, and mainly found in the lexical sphere of the language. 1 Current state and historical development Classical Arabic (CA) is the highly archaic variety of Arabic that, after its cod- ification by the Arab Grammarians around the beginning of the ninth century, becomes the most dominant written register of Arabic. While forms of Middle Arabic, a style somewhat intermediate between CA and spoken dialects, gain some traction in the Middle Ages, CA remains the most important written regis- ter for official, religious and scientific purposes. From the moment of CA’s rise to dominance as a written language, the whole of the Arabic-speaking world can be thought of as having transitioned into a state of diglossia (Ferguson 1959; 1996), where CA takes up the High register and the spoken dialects the Low register.1 Representation in writing of these spoken dia- lects is (almost) completely absent in the written record for much of the Middle Ages. Eventually, CA came to be largely replaced for administrative purposes by Ottoman Turkish, and at the beginning of the nineteenth century, it was function- ally limited to religious domains (Glaß 2011: 836).
    [Show full text]
  • Cognate Words in Mehri and Hadhrami Arabic
    Cognate Words in Mehri and Hadhrami Arabic Hassan Obeid Alfadly* Khaled Awadh Bin Mukhashin** Received: 18/3/2019 Accepted: 2/5/2019 Abstract The lexicon is one important source of information to establish genealogical relations between languages. This paper is an attempt to describe the lexical similarities between Mehri and Hadhrami Arabic and to show the extent of relatedness between them, a very little explored and described topic. The researchers are native speakers of Hadhrami Arabic and they paid many field visits to the area where Mehri is spoken. They used the Swadesh list to elicit their data from more than 20 Mehri informants and from Johnston's (1987) dictionary "The Mehri Lexicon and English- Mehri Word-list". The researchers employed lexicostatistical techniques to analyse their data and they found out that Mehri and Hadhrmi Arabic have so many cognate words. This finding confirms Watson (2011) claims that Arabic may not have replaced all the ancient languages in the South-Western Arabian Peninsula and that dialects of Arabic in this area including Hadhrami Arabic are tinged, to a greater or lesser degree, with substrate features of the Pre- Islamic Ancient and Modern South Arabian languages. Introduction: three branches including Central Semitic, Historically speaking, the Semitic language Ethiopian and Modern south Arabian languages family from which both of Arabic and Mehri (henceforth MSAL). Though Arabic and Mehri descend belong to a larger family of languages belong to the West Semitic, Arabic descends called Afro-Asiatic or Hamito-Semitic that from the Central Semitic and Mehri from includes Semitic, Egyptian, Cushitic, Omotic, (MSAL) which consists of two branches; the Berber and Chadic (Rubin, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 18 October 2017 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Bellem, Alex and Watson, Janet C. E. (2017) 'South Arabian sibilants and the Sert¡ s §scontrast.', in To the Madbar and back again : studies in the languages, archaeology, and cultures of Arabia dedicated to Michael C.A. Macdonald. Leiden ; Boston: Brill, pp. 622-644. Studies in Semitic languages and linguistics. (92). Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004357617032 Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk PRE-PUBLICATION VERSION TO APPEAR IN L. Nehmé & A. Al-Jallad (eds) To the Madbar and Back Again: Studies in the languages, archaeology, and cultures of Arabia dedicated to Michael C.A. Macdonald, Brill (2018) South Arabian sibilants and the Śḥerɛ̄ t s̃ ~ š contrast1 Alex Bellem, Durham University & Janet C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modern South Arabian Languages
    HETZRON, R. (ed.). 1997. The Semitic Languages. London : Routledge, p. 378-423. The Modern South Arabian Languages Marie-Claude SIMEONE-SENELLE CNRS - LLACAN. Meudon. France 0. INTRODUCTION 0.1. In the South of the Arabian Peninsula, in the Republic of the Yemen and in the Sultanate of Oman, live some 200,000 Arabs whose maternal language is not Arabic but one of the so- called Modern South Arabian Languagues (MSAL). This designation is very inconvenient because of the consequent ambiguity, but a more appropriate solution has not been found so far. Although there exists a very close relationship with other languages of the same Western South Semitic group, the MSAL are different enough from Arabic to make intercomprehension impossible between speakers of any of the MSAL and Arabic speakers. The MSAL exhibit many common features also with the Semitic languages of Ethiopia; their relationships with Epigraphic South Arabian (SahaydicLanguages, according to Beeston) remain a point of discussion. There are six MSAL: Mehri (=M), HarsVsi (=H), BaT©ari (=B), HobyOt (=Hb), Jibbßli (=J), SoqoTri (=S. As regards the number of speakers and the geographical extension, Mehri is the main language. It is spoken by the Mahra tribes (about 100,000 speakers) and some Beyt Kathir, in the mountains of Dhofar in Oman, and in the Yemen, in the far eastern Governorate, on the coast, between the border of Oman and the eastern bank of Wadi Masilah, and not in the Mukalla area, contrary to Johnstone's statement (1975:2); in the North-West of the Yemen, Mehri is spoken as far as Thamud, on the border of the Rubº al-Khali.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Salvaging the Forgotten Mehri Tongue in Saudi Arabia
    ARECLS, Vol. 14, 2017, p. 98-141 BLOWING OFF THE DUST: TOWARDS SALVAGING THE FORGOTTEN MEHRI TONGUE IN SAUDI ARABIA Thamer Abdullah M Marzouq (Newcastle University) Abstract Drawing on the fields of the language planning and policy (LPP) and language revitalisation, the main purpose of the paper at hand is to propose a tentative action plan which could prove useful in salvaging the endangered language of Mehri from falling into disuse in Saudi Arabia. The paper considers the work and efforts of pioneering researchers within the field of language revitalisation, who have been researching the case of Mehri language in Yemen and Oman as well as other key literature on LPP, language revitalisation, documentation and descriptive linguistics. It later shifts to discuss some practical solutions to preserving the language spoken by the Mehri tribe that live in Saudi Arabia. It also reviews a number of terms and definitions which are of key relevance to the topic. For a successful language revitalisation of Mehri to be achieved within the Saudi context, the proposed action plan argues for the application of three LPP strategies, encompassing each of corpus, status and acquisition planning. Keywords: language planning and policy, language revitalisation, endangered languages, documentation and description 98 ARECLS, Vol. 14, 2017, p. 98-141 Introduction Most of the world’s minority languages today are susceptible to extinction at an alarming rate. Experts predict that at least half the world’s seven thousand languages will cease to exist by the end of 21st century (Thomason, 2015, p. 2). Generally speaking, natural disasters, conflicts and annihilations, overt repression, and the irrepressible economic, political, and cultural hegemony are among the main causes which have led to language endangerment (Sallabank, 2012, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Mehri and Hobyot Spoken in Oman and in Yemen Marie-Claude Simeone-Senelle
    Mehri and Hobyot spoken in Oman and in Yemen Marie-Claude Simeone-Senelle To cite this version: Marie-Claude Simeone-Senelle. Mehri and Hobyot spoken in Oman and in Yemen. 2010. halshs- 00907743 HAL Id: halshs-00907743 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00907743 Preprint submitted on 21 Nov 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. MEHRI AND HOBYOT SPOKEN IN OMAN AND YEMEN Marie-Claude SIMEONE-SENELLE (CNRS. France) [email protected] INTRODUCTION In the South of the Arabian Peninsula in the Sultanate of Oman and in the Republic of the Yemen, live about 200,000 Arabs whose maternal tongue is not Arabic but one of the six so- 1 called Modern South Arabian Languages (= MSAL). Mehri, Harsusi [ħarsūsi], Bathari 2 [baṭħari], Hobyot [hōbyyt], Jibbali [ǧibbāli], and SoqoTri [sḳʌ́ṭri]. Only Mehri and Hobyot are spoken in the two countries. Except Soqotri spoken only in the Yemenite islands of Soqoṭra, ‘Abd-el-Kūri and Samħa, all others are spoken in Oman. The six MSAL within the Afro-Asiatic family belong, like Arabic, to the Western Semitic group. More precisely they are included in the Western Southern Semitic sub-group.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Title
    Binyam Sisay Mendisu & Janne Bondi Johannessen (eds.) Multilingual Ethiopia: Linguistic Chal- lenges and Capacity Building Efforts, Oslo Studies in Language 8(1), 2016. 219–242. (ISSN 1890- 9639) http://www.journals.uio.no/osla on the role of south arabian and ethio-semitic within a comparative semitic lexicographical project lutz edzard abstract Genetic classification in general depends to a large extent on the criteria selected. Inspired by Kogan 2015 and other sources, this paper looks at specific lexical peculiarities and semantic traits in the South Semitic (mainly modern South Arabian and Ethio-Semitic) lexicon, in order to de- termine the value of the South Semitic lexicon for genetic classification within Semitic at large. [1] introduction This paper focuses on the role and importance of the lexicon for genetic classi- fication, more specifically on the role of (mainly modern) South Arabian and Ethio-Semitic in this context, a role which recently has been highlighted by Kogan (2015). It is a truism that linguistic classification to a large degree de- pends on the criteria selected, i.e. phonological, morphological, and other data. Therefore, the main criteria, or rather shared innovations that are usually cited in this connection, are summarized in the following (cf. Faber 1997: 7–12): – East Semitic is characterized by the development of an adjectival ending -ūt (pl. m.) and by the dative suffixes -kum and -šum; – West Semitic is characterized by the suffix conjugation denoting past tense (as opposed to the Akkadian stative)
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 9 (2017) 1–7 brill.com/aall Introduction Sabrina Bendjaballah umr 6310 cnrs & Université de Nantes [email protected] Philippe Ségéral umr 7110 cnrs & Université Paris 7 [email protected] The 12 contributions to this special issue of baall examine different aspects of the Modern South Arabian Languages (msal) from various perspectives: analysis of individual msal, comparative analysis of various msal, and formal grammar. msal comprise an independent branch of the Semitic family. They are spoken in Yemen, and in the Dhofar Governorate of Oman: Mehri and Hobyot are both spoken in both countries, Ḥarsusi, Jibbali, Baṭḥari are spoken in Oman, Soqoṭri is spoken on the island of Soqotra (Yemen). The existence of msal has been detected only recently: Soqoṭri, Jibbali and Mehri were discovered during the first half of the 19th century (1834, 1836 and 1840 respectively), while Ḥarsusi, Baṭḥari and Hobyot were discovered during the 20th century (1937 for the first two, and 1981 for the last one). The Austrian Südarabische Expedition at the very end of the 19th century constitutes a first, fundamental step towards the analysis and knowledge of msal (see the publications by Maximilian Bittner, Alfred Jahn, David Hein- rich Müller etc. in the frame of the Viennese Kaiserliche Akademie der Wis- senschaften). After this step, important results have been achieved, e.g. by Wolf Leslau (Lexique Socotri, 1938) and Ewald Wagner (Syntax der Mehri-Sprache, 1953). The major breakthrough in the study of msal is due to Thomas Muir Johnstone (1924–1983) in the 1960s–1980s: T.M.
    [Show full text]
  • De L'analysibilité Des Racines De L'hébreu Biblique
    De l’analysibilité des racines de l’hébreu biblique Jonas Sibony To cite this version: Jonas Sibony. De l’analysibilité des racines de l’hébreu biblique. Linguistique. Ecole normale supérieure de lyon - ENS LYON, 2013. Français. NNT : 2013ENSL0853. tel-00935550 HAL Id: tel-00935550 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00935550 Submitted on 23 Jan 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE en vue de l'obtention du grade de Docteur de l’Université de Lyon, délivré par l’École Normale Supérieure de Lyon Discipline : Sciences du langage - Linguistique Laboratoire : Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations (ICAR) - UMR 5191 École Doctorale N°484 : Lettres, langues, linguistique et Art présentée et soutenue publiquement le 18 novembre 2013 par Monsieur Jonas SIBONY _____________________________________________ De l’analysibilité des racines de l’hébreu biblique ______________________________________________ Directeur de thèse : M. Georges BOHAS Après l'avis de : M. Jean-Pierre ANGOUJARD M. David HAMIDOVI Ć Devant la commission d'examen formée de : M. Jean-Pierre ANGOUJARD, Professeur émérite, Université de Nantes – Rapporteur - Président M. Daniel BODI, Professeur, Université Paris 8-Saint Denis - Membre M. Georges BOHAS, Professeur, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon – Directeur de thèse M.
    [Show full text]
  • On Ejective Fricatives in Omani Mehri
    Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 9 (2017) 139–159 brill.com/aall On ejective fricatives in Omani Mehri Rachid Ridouane* Laboratoire de Phonétique et Phonologie, cnrs/Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris [email protected] Cédric Gendrot Laboratoire de Phonétique et Phonologie, cnrs/Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris [email protected] Abstract Ejective fricatives are extremely rare cross-linguistically. This infrequency is generally attributed to the incompatibility of two aerodynamic requirements: airflow to create noise frication and a high intraoral air pressure to implement ejectivity. Seeking to determine how this incompatibility is solved, this study presents an acoustic investi- gation of initial and intervocalic ejective fricatives in Mehri, a Modern South Arabian language spoken in Oman. Based on data from 5 Mehri speakers, the analysis of differ- ent temporal and non-temporal parameters shows a high degree of variability in the way ejectivity is implemented in fricatives. Much of this variability is shaped by the position of the segments within the word. In initial position, the ejectivity of fricatives translates into a frequent presence of post-frication glottal lags, higher intensity and higher center of gravity. These acoustic attributes are less frequently encountered in intervocalic position. In this position, it is argued, the systematic diphthongization of the following long vowel, induced by ejectivity combined with dorsopharyngealisation, is salient enough to allow the contrast of ejectivity to be recovered. Keywords ejective fricatives – acoustics – Mehri – Modern South Arabian language * This work was funded by a grant from the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche Scien- tifique (anr program OmanSam) and by the Labex efl (anr/CGI).
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Mehri Tongues.” Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (Aden) 1 (June 1996): 27-46
    Mahri Language and Poetry al-Aidaroos, Mustafa Zein. “An Introduction to the Mehri Tongues.” Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (Aden) 1 (June 1996): 27-46. al-Aidaroos, Mustafa Zein. “Arabic Alphabet for Mehri Phonemes.” al-Yaman Journal (Aden) 2 (1999). al-Aidaroos, Mustafa Zein. “Modern South Arbaian Language and Classical Arabic: A Comparative Study.” Nadwa al-ʾalsina wa-l-lahajāt al-yamaniyya, ʿAdan 2-3 abrīl 2000, 47-63. Aden: (no publisher information), 2001. Āl Ḥafīẓ, ʿAlī Muḥsin. Min lahajāt “Mahra” wa-ʾādābihā. Musqat: Majallat al-Nahḍa al- ʿUmāniyya, 1987. Bakheit, Sabri, Antoine Lonnet and Marie-Claude Simeone-Senelle. “Histoire de Said, Saida, la méchante femme et l’ange: Un conte mehri suivi de remarques linguistiques.” Matériaux arabes et sudarabiques 2 (1984): 237–270. Bittner, Maximilian. Studien zur Laut- und Formenlehre der Mehri-Sprache in Südarabien. 5 vols. Vienna: Sitzungberichte der Kais, Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1909–15. Hein, Wilhelm. Mehri- und Ḥaḍrami-Texte. Vienna: Alfred Hölder, 1909. Jahn, Alfred. Die Mehri-Sprache in Südarabien. Vienna: Alfred Hölder, 1902. Johnstone, Thomas. “A Definite Article in the Modern South Arabian Languages.” Bulletin of the School of African and Asian Studies 33:2 (1970): 295-307. Johnstone, Thomas. “Dual forms in Mehri and Ḥarsūsi.” Bulletin of the School of African and Asian Studies 33:tk (1970): 501–512. Johnstone, Thomas. “Diminutives in Modern South Arabian.” Journal of Semitic Studies 28:1 (1973): 98-107. Johnstone, Thomas. “Contrasting Articulations in the Modern South Arabian Languages.” Hamito-Semitica. Edited by James Bynon and Theodora Bynon, 155-157. Paris: Mouton, 1975. Johnstone, Thomas. “The Modern South Arabian Languages.” Afroasiatic Linguistics 1:5 (1975): 93–121.
    [Show full text]