<<

ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at

Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database

Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature

Zeitschrift/Journal: Bonn zoological Bulletin - früher Bonner Zoologische Beiträge.

Jahr/Year: 2017

Band/Volume: 66

Autor(en)/Author(s): Scherges Alice Marie, Rödder Dennis

Artikel/Article: The advertisement calls of Epipedobates anthonyi (Noble, 1921) and Epipedobates tricolor (Boulenger, 1899) (Anura: Dendrobatidae: Colostethinae): intra- and interspecific comparisons 73-84 © Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 April 2017

The advertisement calls of Epipedobates anthonyi (Noble, 1921) and Epipedobates tricolor (Boulenger, 1899) (Anura: Dendrobatidae: Colostethinae): intra- and interspecific comparisons

Alice Marie Scherges1* & Dennis Rödder1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Leibniz Institute of Biodiversity, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany; E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract. Vocal communication is the main mechanism to exchange information in many groups of , and anu- rans represent an impressive example of complex acoustic communication signals. To date several calls with different and partly multiple meanings have been described for numerous species. Anuran calls were found to be species-specif- ic, providing important taxonomic information, and advertisement calls are frequently used for systematic assignments. The closely related poison dart Epipedobates anthonyi and Epipedobates tricolor inhabit geographically disjunct areas in Ecuador and Peru. Both species are very similar in appearance and have frequently been confused. Consequent- ly, multiple scientific publications on E. tricolor refer to E. anthonyi instead and vice versa. This is also true for the de- scriptions of the species’ advertisement call. So far, no comparative study on the species’ calls exists. Here we analyze and compare the calls of E. anthonyi and E. tricolor. We found the advertisement calls of both species to be very simi- lar in general but to differ in pulse frequency and interval. Thus, they can be distinguished with certainty. However, a comparison of characteristic call patterns between populations revealed intraspecific variation to be higher than interspe- cific variation, which questions the usefulness of calls for species delimitation of frogs for the Epipedobates. Keywords. Acoustic communication, anurans, bioacoustics, species delimitation, systematics.

INTRODUCTION calls during the breeding season to attract females (Bogert 1960; Wells & Schwartz 2006; Wells 2007). How- Communicational signals are primarily visual or acoustic, ever, acoustic signals may also have territorial (Bogert but can also be chemical, seismic, electrical or tactile 1960) or competitive (Wells & Schwartz 2006; Wells (Pough 2001, Janik & McGregor 2014) and often combi- 2007) meaning, are used for localization (Whitney & nations of different signals are used (Starnberger et al. Krebs 1975; Wells 1977, 1978), or as defense, distress, or 2014). Anurans primarily use acoustic communication alarm signal (Bogert 1960; Wells 2007). Previous research which plays a significant role in reproduction and social reveals that quantitative and qualitative parameters of anu- interactions (Salthe & Mecham 1974). Capranica & Rose ran advertisement calls are species-specific and thus fa- (1983) showed that the anuran auditory system is highly cilitate systematic assignments, particularly in poison-ar- adapted to the species-specific dominant frequencies and row frogs (Wells 1977; Zimmermann & Zimmermann furthermore functions as a filter, improving the detection 1988; De la Riva et al. 1996; Lötters et al. 1999; Napoli of important signals and suppressing distracting back- & Cruz 2005; Padial et al. 2008, Mayer et al. 2014). ground noises. According to Wells (2007) the whole fe- In this study, we characterize and analyse the advertise- male sensory system is tuned to detect certain spectral and ment calls of two species of poison dart frogs, E. antho- temporal characteristics of calls, including frequency and nyi and E. tricolor. The distributional range of the poison pulse rate, whereas the ranges of the characters depend on dart Epipedobates anthonyi stretches from southwest- the species. This ability also allows discrimination between ern Ecuador to neighboring areas of northwestern Peru conspecific and heterospecific calls (Fritsch et al. 1988) (Zimmermann 1983a; Lötters et al. 2007). Within this through recognition of specific spectral and temporal com- range twelve different populations with distinct morpho- ponents (Salthe & Mecham 1974; Wells 1977; Ryan 1985; types exist; however, precise information on the distribu- Cocroft & Ryan 1995). tion of most is lacking (Ostrowski & Mahn 2016). The Many different types of calls and their respective func- species’ natural habitat covers hot and humid forests, tions have been described (e.g., Borgert 1960; Littlejohn gallery forests and rivers which are surrounded by dry and 1977; Hödl 1996; Wells & Schwartz 2006; Wells 2007). sparsely vegetated landscapes at an elevation of up to In most anuran species only males produce advertisement 1,800 m (Lötters et al. 2007). Different call types have

Received: 17.10.2016 Corresponding editor: W. Böhme Accepted: 04.04.2017 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

74 Alice Marie Scherges & Dennis Rödder

Fig. 1. Photographs of selected specimens of all study populations of Epipedobates anthonyi and Epipedobates tricolor. A: E. anthonyi I: “Buena Esperanza”. B: E. anthonyi II: “Rio Jubones”. C: E. anthonyi III: “Rio Saladillo”. D: E. anthonyi IV: “Tierra alta”. E: E. tricolor V: “Moraspungo”. F: E. tricolor VI: “Rio Soloma”. been reported for this species and besides the known func- Schwartz 2006; Wells 2007), their advertisement call al- tions (courtship behavior, territorial behavior, competition, so triggers specific short-term behavior (females show localization, defense signal, distress signal and alarm sig- positive phonotactic responses on the day of oviposition, nal) (e.g., Bogert 1960; Whitney & Krebs 1975; Wells & which are head lifting, persevering, orienting by head and

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

Intra- and interspecific comparisons of advertisement calls of poison dart frogs 75 body movements, zigzag hopping towards sound source, frogimport.com now available at https://nasuta.nl/] and tactile contact to sound source) and reproductive state Raymond Kuijf, both the Netherlands). Populations were (Zimmermann & Rahmann 1987). According to Hermans held in separate enclosures measuring 70 x 60 x 50 cm et al. (2002), specific calls might also serve to identify al- (H x W x D) or 40 x 40 x 50 cm. Enclosures were dense- ready occupied territories. The closely related species ly vegetated with tropical plants such as Pilea sp., bromeli- Epipedobates tricolor inhabits premontane forests and ads like Neoregelia schultesiana, some mosses and ten- sparsely vegetated margins of streams in western and cen- drils and equipped with a small pond of water. The bot- tral Ecuador (Graham et al. 2004; Lötters 2007). tom was covered with wet sponges and walls were lined Silverstone (1976) recorded a population of E. antho- with cork for all populations except “Tierra alta”, for nyi from the province Azuay in Ecuador which he erro- which Hygrolon was used instead. The air temperature was neously identified as E. tricolor. Graham et al. (2004) cor- kept between 22 and 24 °C with constant conditions dur- rected the mistake several decades later by detecting sig- ing all recordings; rain was simulated by irrigation sys- nificant genetic differences that correspond to the geo- tems running three times per day for 30 minutes, and wa- graphically disjunct distribution ranges, separated by a cor- ter was sprayed three times per day for 30 seconds, to ridor of 200 km. Based on the assignment by Silverstone maintain humidity. (1976), multiple scientific papers confused the two The calls were recorded using a PMD620MKII Profes- species including the description of the advertisement call sional Handheld Recorder (Marantz Professional, Kawasa- of E. tricolor which actually corresponds to E. anthonyi ki, Japan) by placing the recorder on the sound-permeable in Zimmermann & Rahmann (1987). For their studies ceiling of the enclosures and maintaining a distance of sev- Zimmermann & Rahmann (1987) used specimens from eral meters from the enclosures to keep disturbance to a their own breeding stock (Zimmermann 1983b), which minimum. To ensure suitable recordings, the irrigation sys- were identified following Zimmermann (1983a). tem was deactivated during recordings. All calls were According to Zimmermann & Rahmann (1987), the ad- recorded, cut and processed using Audacity V. 2.0.5. vertisement call, emitted by males during the breeding sea- (Audacity Development Team, available at son, is a long trilling high-pitched sound with a duration http://audacity.sourceforge.net). For visualization we used of 2.15–5.2 s, on average 40–115 pulses per trill, and a the seewave package for Cran R 3.3.2 (Sueur et al. 2008). dominant frequency ranging between 4,160–4,530 Hz. The Spectrograms were utilized to measure call length, pulse pulses last about 15–25 ms, whereas the pulse intervals length, pulse intervals and number of pulses; frequencies show a length of 30–50 ms. However, the advertisement of each call were plotted using a Hanning Window with call of E. tricolor remained yet undescribed. Here, we pro- a size of 512 and a linear representation to determine dom- vide a description of the advertisement call of E. tricolor inant frequencies, fundamental frequencies and har- and compare spectral and temporal call characteristics be- monies. Images from oscillograms and spectrograms were tween the closely related species to assess whether produced for each population. In addition, minima, max- acoustic-based species discrimination is feasible. In ad- ima and mean values of important call features (call du- dition, we quantify intraspecific variation in call patterns ration, number of pulses, pulse duration, pulse frequen- by comparing calls of geographically isolated populations. cy, pulse interval length and important frequencies) were computed. Furthermore, one-way ANOVA tests were per- formed to test for significant differences between impor- MATERIAL AND METHODS tant call parameters of E. anthonyi and E. tricolor; post hoc Tukey HSD tests were used to assess intra- and inter- To compare acoustic signals of Epipedobates anthonyi and specific differences. Epipedobates tricolor, advertisement calls of four popu- lations of E. anthonyi, and two populations of E. tricolor were recorded. Study populations for E. anthonyi comprise RESULTS I: “Buena Esperanza” (n=5), II: “Rio Jubones” (n= 6) and III: “Rio Saladillo” from geographically ranges in the A total of 401 calls were recorded and analyzed. For E. vicinity of El, Oro, Ecuador (Ostrowksi & Mahn 2016) anthonyi 282 calls were recorded (89 for I: “Buena Es- and IV: “Tierra alta” (n=4) which occurs along the bor- peranza”, 39 for II: “Rio Jubones”, 64 for III: “Rio Sal- der of Loja and Peru (Ostrowski & Mahn 2016). Study adillo”, 90 for IV: “Tierra alta”), 119 calls were recorded populations for E. tricolor comprise V: Moraspungo (n=6) for E. tricolor (68 for V: “Moraspungo”, 51 for VI: “Rio from Cotopaxi and VI: “Rio Soloma” (n=4) from Bolívar Soloma”). (Ostrowski & Mahn 2016) (Fig. 1). All frogs were obtained The advertisement calls of both species were found to from the pet trade and represent F2 from wild caught spec- be high-pitched and trilling with numerous pronounced imens (Understory Enterprises Inc. [www.understoryen- pulses per call, six harmonies located above and a funda- terprises.com] via Peruvian frog import [www.peruvian- mental frequency located below the dominant frequency

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

76 Alice Marie Scherges & Dennis Rödder

Fig. 2. Spectrograms and oscillograms of the recorded advertisement calls of Epipedobates anthonyi A: “Bueno Esperanza”, B: “Rio Jubones”, C: “Rio Saladillo” and D: “Tierra Alta”.

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

Intra- and interspecific comparisons of advertisement calls of poison dart frogs 77

Fig. 3. Spectrograms and oscillograms of the recorded advertisement calls of Epipedobates tricolor. A: “Moraspungo” and B: “Rio Soloma”.

(Figs. 2, 3). In general, dominant frequencies, fundamen- The trilling signals of E. anthonyi had an average du- tal frequencies and harmonies remained constant from the ration of 2.55 s ± 1.267 (range: 0.5–5.6 s; n=282), were beginning to the end, but for some calls slightly lower ini- composed of 48.521 pulses ± 20.971 (range: 9–99 puls- tial frequencies could be recognized followed by stabiliza- es; n=282) per call and had a pulse frequency of 20.293 tion at higher values. Comparable to this, pulse frequen- pulses/s ± 5.02 (range: 8.776–40 pulses/s; n=282; com- cy and arrangement of pulses remained relatively regular puted for each call by dividing the number of pulses maintaining similar distances to the neighboring pulses through call length). Every pulse possessed a length of during the whole call, but sometimes this was modulat- 17.091 ms ± 4.041 (range: 9–33 ms; n=282), and the av- ed. We observed that pulse frequency for some calls was erage length of intervals between pulses was 32.645 ms lower at the beginning and increased after an initial phase. ± 7.618 (range: 14–71 ms; n=282). The dominant frequen- Also, in the final stage an increasing pulse frequency can cy with an average value of 4.24 kHz ± 0.672 (range: be recognized for some signals. However, the pulse pat- 3.126–5.67 kHz; n=282) was located above the fundamen- tern is occasionally irregular with two or more pulses tal frequency of 2.196 kHz ± 4.737 (range: 1.456–4.584 forming groups which are clearly separated from other kHz; n=229) and below up to six harmonies occupying a groups of pulses, so that calls consist of several notes with frequency band of 4.497–18.135 kHz. The first harmony a variable number of pulses per note. Although this was averaged on 5.918 kHz ± 0.483 (range: 4.441–7.151 kHz; observed in both species, it remains an exception. Due to n=262), whereas the last harmony was observable at a fre- automatic recording, calls could not be related to specif- quency of 16.997 kHz ± 1.138 (range: 12.330–18.135 ic individuals within the monitored tank. kHz; n=150). Detailed harmony frequency values are de- picted in Table 1.

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

78 Alice Marie Scherges & Dennis Rödder

Table 1. Properties of the advertisement calls of Epipedobates anthonyi and Epipedobates tricolor in comparison. Values are giv- en as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

Intra- and interspecific comparisons of advertisement calls of poison dart frogs 79 . ) D S (

n o i t a i v e d

d r a d n a t s

±

n a e m

s a

n e v i g

e r a

s e u l a V

. n o s i r a p m o c

n i r o l o c i r t

. E

d n a i y n o h t n a

. E

f o I V – I

s n o i t a l u p o p

f o

s l l a c

t n e m e s i t r e v d a

e h t

f o

s e i t r e p o r P

. 2

e l b a T

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

80 Alice Marie Scherges & Dennis Rödder . ) D S (

n o i t a i v e d

d r a d n a t s

±

n a e m

s a

n e v i g

e r a

s e u l a V

. n o s i r a p m o c

n i

r o l o c i r t

s e t a b o d e p i p E

d n a

i y n o h t n a

s e t a b o d e p i p E

f o

s l l a c

t n e m e s i t r e v d a

e h t

f o

s e i t r e p o r P

. 3

e l b a T

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

Intra- and interspecific comparisons of advertisement calls of poison dart frogs 81

For the advertisement calls of E. tricolor an average Post hoc Tukey HSD tests revealed E. tricolor to show length of 2.016 s ± 0.337 (range: 0.6–2.6 s; n=119) was statistically significant differences across both populations measured. The total number of pulses per note was 60.765 in the number of pulses per call (p<0.05), however, dom- ± 11.682 (range: 14–79; n=119) with 30.051 ± 3.039 puls- inant and fundamental frequency, pulse frequency, pulse es per second (range: 17.5–33.75 pulses/s; n=119). The length, pulse interval and call duration do not vary sig- single pulses on average persisted for 13.958 ms ± 2.584 nificantly. In E. anthonyi there were statistically signifi- (range: 9–22 ms; n=119) and maintained intervals for cant differences between population I and III for all pa- 19.748 ms ± 2.324 (range: 13–26 ms; n=119). A domi- rameters that were included (p<0.01 each). In contrast, nant frequency of 4.081 kHz ± 0.218 (range: 3.551–5.431 population II and IV only statistically significantly differ kHz; n=119) and a fundamental frequency of 2.229 kHz in number of pulses per call, pulse frequency, pulse length ± 0.153 (range: 2.036–2.814 kHz; n=96) was measured. and pulse interval length (p<0.01 each), whereas call du- As for E. anthonyi, six harmonies above the dominant fre- ration (p=0.957), dominant frequency (p=0.999), and fun- quency could be recognized, occupying a frequency band damental frequency (p=0.999) do not show statistically of 4.719–16.869 kHz. For detailed results see Table 1. In significant differences. Pairwise comparison of all remain- general, observed variations were lower in E. tricolor than ing combinations of the populations proved at least five in E. anthonyi. statistically significant different parameters of included One-way ANOVA tests were used to assess statistical- call properties. For detailed results see Table 3. ly significant differences between all local variants of E. anthonyi and E. tricolor for the most relevant call prop- erties: call length (F(5,395)=77.16; p<0.001), fundamental fre- DISCUSSION quency (F(5,319)=6.031; p<0.001), dominant frequency (F(5,395)=62.97; p<0.001), pulse interval (F(5,395)=117.8; Properties of the advertisement call of Epipedobates an- p<0.001), number of pulses per call (F(5,395)=46.8: p<0.001), thonyi in the present study were generally in accordance pulse frequency (F(5,395)=200.4; p<0.001), pulse length with the physical characteristics determined by Zimmer- (F(5,395)=33.84; p<0.001). mann & Rahmann (1987), but call patterns were revealed Intraspecific differences between the populations of E. to be more variable. Although the note length (2.15–5.2 anthonyi and E. tricolor were detected in terms of stan- s) described by Zimmermann & Rahmann (1987) match- dard deviation. While there are very slight differences be- es the computed average call duration observed in this tween E. tricolor V: “Moraspungo” and VI: “Rio Soloma” study, we found that the lower limit reported by Zimmer- in matters of some harmony frequencies (first, second, mann & Rahmann (1987) was higher than observed here. fourth and fifth harmonies), huge discrepancies were This was also true for the total number of pulses per note, found between the populations of E. anthonyi. Compar- which Zimmermann & Rahmann (1987) reported to range ing the means and standard variations of call properties from 40 to 115 but was found to range from 9 to 99 in the our results suggested that the variation between the E. an- present study. Due to very few short calls (0.5 s) the av- thonyi populations was much greater than the differences erage call length was slightly shorter than in previous stud- between E. anthonyi and E. tricolor. With a call duration ies (Zimmermann & Rahmann 1987). However, this might of 3.750 s ± 1.343, the call of I: “Buena Esperanza” was be attributed to elevated levels of disturbance in our ani- significantly longer than for the remaining populations, mal keeping facility which may have sometimes led to pre- which all lasted on average 2 s. Furthermore the total num- mature interruption of calls. Zimmermann & Rahmann ber of pulses per call is highest for I as well (63.970 s ± (1987) reported pulse durations between 14–25 ms with 24.349). For III: “Rio Saladillo” and IV: “Tierra alta” we intervals of 30–50 ms. Although pulse duration and inter- found a slightly elevated pulse frequency (22.875 s ± 6.284 vals determined in this study were both longer, results are and 20.500 s ± 1.94) in comparison with I (17.198 s ± comparable in general. While Zimmermann & Rahmann 3.153) and II (16.153 s ± 2.980). The dominant frequen- (1987) studied a single population we studied four, which cy of I (3.649 kHz ± 0.264) is lower than the dominant could account for the variation in recorded pulse duration frequencies of the other populations, all averaging above and intervals. Zimmermann & Rahmann (1987) found 4.000 kHz. Additionally, smaller values for the fifth and most calls recorded to exhibit only a single harmony with the sixth harmonies were recognized for I, and III also a frequency around 8 kHz while up to six distinct har- showed a decreased average for the sixth harmony. Be- monies were present in the majority of the calls in the pres- sides, we noticed slight variations between all populations ent study. The few cases in which no or only few har- of E. anthonyi in terms of the first and the fourth harmo- monies could be identified were caused by background ny. In general, population I was most variable showing the noises or low calls. Pulse frequency and fundamental fre- highest variability across all populations in terms of stan- quency were not reported previously. dard deviation. Intraspecific differences are depicted in A comparison of the call characteristics of both species Table 2. yielded small variations. While patterns in E. anthonyi

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

82 Alice Marie Scherges & Dennis Rödder were very similar in terms of standard deviation in note graphically separated units and conspecific populations duration, number of pulses per note, pulse duration and and that variations increase with geographical distances all important frequency values, standard deviations of E. (Nei 1972; Wöhrmann & Jain 1990; Hutchinson & Tem- tricolor revealed similarity of calls to be restricted to calls pleton 1999), it appears likely that population I exhibits to note duration, number of pulses per call, and all impor- the largest geographic distance to all other populations of tant frequencies except for the last harmony. As we stud- E. anthonyi. Intraspecific differences of E. tricolor were ied four populations of E. anthonyi but only two popula- very low and their distribution is poorly known as well. tions of E. tricolor, these discrepancies between the stan- Considering huge call similarities, both populations dard deviations might be attributed to sample size. might show small geographical distance. Despite the similarities, calls of both species clearly dif- Previous research demonstrated that depending on the fer in pulse interval length (E. anthonyi: 32.645 ± 7.618 species, some call characteristics are more important for vs. E. tricolor: 19.748 ± 2.324) which results in a signif- species discrimination than others, and sometimes only a icantly higher pulse frequency for E. tricolor than for E. single feature varies between two closely related species, anthonyi (E. anthonyi: 20.293 ± 5.02 vs. E. tricolor: for example, in some species of Bufo (Cocroft & Ryan 30.051 ± 3.039), which might be attributed to local vari- 1995). Thus, calls can be very helpful for taxonomic mat- ation across their different distribution areas. Pulse fre- ters, facilitating acoustic signal- based species discrimi- quency is known to be important for anuran communica- nation (Wells 1977; Zimmermann & Zimmermann 1988; tion (Cocroft & Ryan 1995) and according to Cocroft & De la Riva et al. 1995, 1996; Lötters et al. 1999; Padial Ryan (1995) this feature seems to be the most divergent et al. 2008). However, calls are not always suitable to dis- character in advertisement calls for the genera Bufo and criminate between closely related taxa in (Löt- Pseudacris and is different in almost every species includ- ters et al. 2001; Napoli & Cruz 2005; Tsuji-Nishikidoet ed in their study. Given the clear differences in pulse fre- et al. 2012). Tsuji-Nishikidoet et al. (2012) showed that quency and interval length, which were found between E. differentiation is not possible based on acoustic signals for anthonyi and E. tricolor, these characteristics might prove the closely related species Allobates nidicola and A. mas- to be relevant characters for species delimitation in niger (Aromobatidae), which occupy similar areas along Epipedobates (significantly different in intraspecific the Madeira River. Additionally, previous research on frogs comparisons: 100%, intraspecific comparisons: 71.5 %). of the genus Allobates (Aromobatidae) supports that dis- Only few descriptions of the advertisement calls of oth- crepancies in call characters are often associated with ge- er species of Epipedobates exist, except for a comprehen- netic differences in amphibians but do not necessarily in- sive description for E. boulengeri (Barbour, 1909) (Löt- dicate different species (Simões et al. 2008). Advertise- ters et al. 2003) who found distinct advertisement calls for ment call characteristics were shown to be very different two populations from Colombia and Ecuador, respective- even within a species depending on temperature, distribu- ly. While the population from Colombia was found to ex- tion area and other aspects (Bernal et al. 2005; Márquez hibit calls consisting of 1–3 notes, calls of the population & Eekhout 2006; Lötters et al. 2009); this is now also from Ecuador comprised 6–12 significantly shorter notes shown across different populations of E. anthonyi. Huge with lower numbers of pulses per note. Calls consisting differences in call features within E. anthonyi question the of several notes were occasionally recognizable for E. an- suitability of advertisement call characteristics for species thonyi and E. tricolor as well, but these calls remained ex- identification. Between E. anthonyi and E. tricolor signif- ceptions. The dominant frequencies of 5.192 kHz (Colom- icant intraspecific variation could be detected for pulse fre- bia) and 5.198 kHz (Ecuador) for E. boulengeri are high- quency and interval length which can be used for species er than in the present study, thus, their calls differ in at identification. Thus acoustic based classification should least two characteristics from E. anthonyi and E. tricol- be regarded with suspicion for at least those two species or. Further studies are required to facilitate a more thor- of Epipedobates. ough comparison. Because of their different advertisement The present research raises new questions, which require calls, populations of E. boulengeri were thought to rep- further investigation. First, to show if pulse frequency and resent a species complex and Grant et al. (2006) proved interval length, which differ between E. anthonyi and E. E. boulengeri not to be monophyletic based on genetic da- tricolor, are sufficient for females to discriminate between ta. species supporting the genetic assignment by Graham et We found huge intraspecific disparities across popula- al. (2004), further behavioral studies should be conduct- tions of E. anthonyi with population I being the most di- ed: According to the biological species concept, a species vergent. However, as the geographic distribution of the is a group of potentially interbreeding individuals in time, species is poorly known, a character comparison relating thus, mating experiments between E. anthonyi and E. tri- to geographical distribution and environmental influences color could be investigated to detect if pulse frequency and was not possible. Given that previous research on various pulse interval length are relevant for female attraction and taxa revealed varying signals between and within geo- species recognition. Besides, acoustic comparison of more

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

Intra- and interspecific comparisons of advertisement calls of poison dart frogs 83 populations would help to determine whether observed De la Riva I., Márquez R, Bosch J (1996) The advertisement calls variation in pulse frequency and interval length was attrib- of three South American poison frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Den- uted to the restricted sample size or whether these char- drobatidae), with comments on their and distribu- tion. Journal of Natural History 30: 1413–1420 acteristics still differ from each other in a more extensive Fritsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak study and thus proving them to be relevant for species W (1988) The evolution of the auditory system. identification. Further advertisement call comparison of John Wiley & Sons, New York more species of the genus Epipedobates would help to de- Gerhardt HC (1994) The evolution of vocalization in frogs and tect if pulse frequency and pulse interval length are im- toads. Annual Review Ecology and Systematics 25: 213–234 portant for species discrimination for Epipedobates in gen- Gerhardt HC, Schwartz JJ (2001) Auditory and frequency pref- erences in anurans. Pp. 73–85 in: Ryan MJ. (ed.) Anuran Com- eral. In addition, investigations in more populations of both munication. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC species are required to determine whether intraspecific dif- Graham CH, Ron SR, Santos JC, Schneider CJ, Moritz C (2004) ferences are also observable across other populations. Eco- Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to logical mating experiments could help to indicate if fe- explore speciation mechanism in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution males are attracted by calling males from other popula- 58: 1781–1793 tions despite intraspecific differences and thus support the Grant T, Frost DR, Caldwell JP, Gagliardo R, Haddad CFB, Kok populations belonging to the same species. PJR, Means DB, Noonan BP, Schargel WE, Wheeler WC (2006) Phylogenetic systematics of dart-poison frogs and their Sometimes species are difficult to distinguish solely relatives (Amphibia: Athesphatanura: Dendrobatidae). Bulletin based on their genetic or morphological characters (Ru- of the American Museum of Natural History 299: 1–262 binoff et al. 2006). Thus the anuran advertisement call Hermans K, Pinxten R, Eens M (2002) Territorial and vocal be- characteristics can be useful to help classify taxa. To de- haviour in a captive dart-poison frog, Epipedobates tricolor termine which and how many acoustic characters need to Boulenger, 1899 (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Belgian Journal of be used to identify diverging species, more extensive call Zoology 132: 105–109 Hutchinson DW, Templeton AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise comparison studies have to be conducted. Due to intraspe- genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the rel- cific variations for E. anthonyi and E. tricolor, acoustic ative influence of gene flow and drift on the distribution of based discrimination should be interpreted with care. Al- genetic variability. Evolution 53: 1898–1914 though we did not find out whether the observed differ- Janek VM, McGregor P (2014) Animal signals and communi- ent call characteristics facilitate species discrimination be- cation. Springer, Berlin tween E. anthonyi and E. tricolor or if identification based Littlejohn MJ (1977) Long-range acoustic communication in anurans: an integrated and evolutionary approach. Pp. on advertisement calls is possible, this study is a starting 263–294 in: Taylor DH & Guttman SI (eds.) The reproduc- point for further investigations in acoustic based-identi- tive biology of amphibians. Plenum, New York fication of Epipedobates. Lötters S, Glaw F, Köhler J, Castro F (1999) On the geograph- ic variation of the advertisement call of histri- Acknowledgements. The manuscript benefited from critical in- onicus Berthold, 1845 and related forms from northwestern put of two anonymous reviews and Ralph Peters (ZFMK). We South America (Anura: Dendrobatidae). Herpetozoa 12: 23–38 are grateful to Flora Ihlow, Timo Hartmann and David Hörnes Lötters S, Jungfer K-H, Henkel FW, Schmidt W (2007) Poison for logistic support, as well as to the Alexander-Koenig- Frogs. Biology, Species & Captive Husbandry. Edition Chi- Gesellschaft (AKG) for financial support. maira, Frankfurt/M Lötters S, Reichle S, Jungfer K-H (2003) Advertisement calls of Neotropical poison frogs (Ambhibia: Dendrobatidae) of the REFERENCES genera Colostethus, Dendrobates and Epipedobates, with notes on dendrobatid call classification. Journal of Natural Bernal XE, Guarnizo C, Lüddecke H (2005) Geographic varia- History 37: 1899–1911 tion in advertisement call and genetic structure of Colostethus Lötters S, Schmitz A, Reichle S, Rödder D, Quennet V (2009) palmatus (Anura, Dendrobatidae) from Colombian Andes. Another case of cryptic diversity in poison frogs (Dendrobati- Herpetologica 61: 395–408 dae: ) – description of a new species from Bolivia. Bogert CM (1960) The influence of sound on the behavior of Zootaxa 2028: 20–30 amphibians and reptiles. Pp. 137–320 in: Lanyon WE & Tavol- Márquez R, Eekhout XR (2006) Advertisement calls of six ga WN (eds.) Animal sounds and communication. AIBS, species of anurans from Bali, Republic of Indonesia. Journal Washington DC of Natural History 40: 571–588 Capranica RR, Rose G (1983) Frequency and temporal process- Mayer M, Schulte LM, Twomey E, Lötters S (2014) Do male ing in the auditory system of anurans. Pp. 136–152 in: Huber poison frogs respond to modified calls of a Müllerian mim- F & Markl H (eds.) Neuroethology and Behavioral Physiol- ic? Animal Behaviour 89: 45–61 ogy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Napoli MF, Cruz ICS (2005) The advertisement call of Hyla at- Cocroft RB, Ryan MJ (1995) Patterns of advertisement call evo- lantica Caramaschi & Velosa, 1996, with considerations on lution in toads and chorus frogs. Animal Behaviour 49: its taxonomic status (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Arquivos do 283–303 Museu Nacional 63: 283–288 De la Riva I, Márquez R, Bosch J (1995) Advertisement calls Nei M (1972) Genetic distances between populations. The Ame- of eight Bolivian hylids (Amphibia, Anura). Journal of Her- rican Naturalist 106: 283–292. petology 29: 113–118

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at

84 Alice Marie Scherges & Dennis Rödder

Ostrowski T, Mahn T (2016) Artbeschreibung Epipedobates an- Tsuji-Nishikigo B, Kaefer IL, de Freitas FC, Menin M, Lima AP thonyi. Dendrobase.de – Eine Online-Datenbank der Familie (2012) Significant but not diagnostic: Differentiation through Dendrobatidae (Anura). http://www.dendrobase.de/html/ morphology and calls in the Amazonian frogs Allobates nidi- D_epipedobates_anthonyi.html; last accessed in June 2016 cola and A. masniger. Herpetological Journal 22: 105–114 Padial JM, Köhler J, Munõz A, De la Riva I (2008) Assessing Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. the taxonomic status of tropical frogs through bioacoustics: Animal Behaviour 25: 666–693 geographical variation in the advertisement calls in the Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behaviour of amphibians. Uni- Eleutherodactylus discoidalis species group (Anura). Zoolog- versity of Chicago Press, Chicago ical Journal of Linnean Society 152: 353–365 Wells KD, Schwartz JJ (2006) The Behavioral Ecology of Anu- Pough FH (2001) Herpetology, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall Inc., ran Communication. Pp. 44–86 in: Narins PM, Feng AS, Fay New Jersey RR, Popper AN (eds.) Hearing and Sound Communication in Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K (2006) A Genomic Perspective Amphibians. Springer New York, New York on the Shortcomings of Mitochondrial DNA for “Barcoding” Whitney CL, Krebs JR (1975) Spacing and calling in Pacific tree Identification. Journal of Heredity 97: 581–594 frogs, Hyla regilla. Canadian Journal of Zoology 53: Ryan MJ (1985) The túngara frog: a study in sexual selection 1519–1527 and communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Wilczynski W, Ryan MJ (1999) Geographic variation in animal Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W (1991) Evolution of intraspecific vari- communication systems. Pp. 234–261 in: Foster SA & Endler ation in the advertisement call of a cricket frog (Acris crepi- JA (eds.) Geographic variation in Behavior. Oxford Univer- tans, Hylidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 44: sity Press, New York 249–271 Wöhrmann K, Jain SK (1990) Population Biology: Ecological Salthe SN, Mecham JS (1974) Reproductive and courtship pat- and Evolutionary View Points. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidel- terns. Pp. 309–521 in: Lofts B (ed.) Physiology of the Am- berg, Berlin phibia Vol. II. Academic Press, New York Zimmermann E (1983a) Das Züchten von Terrarientieren. Pfle- Silverstone PA (1976) A revision of the poison arrow frogs of ge, Verhalten, Fortpflanzung. Franckh’sche Verlagshandlung, the genus Bibron in Sagra (Family Dendrobati- Kosmos-Verlag, Stuttgart dae). Natural History Museum Los Angeles County Scientif- Zimmermann H (1983b) Durch Nachzucht erhalten: Phylloba- ic Bulletin 27: 1–53 tes tricolor. Aquarien-Magazin 17: 17–22 Simões PI, Lima AP, Magnusson WE, Hödl W, Amézquita A. Zimmermann E, Rahmann H (1987) Acoustic communication (2008) Acoustic and morphological differentiation in the frog in the poison-arrow frog Phyllobates tricolor: advertisement Allobates femoralis: Relationships with the upper Madeira Riv- calls and their effects on behavior and metabolic brain activ- er and other potential geographical barriers. Biotropica 40: ity of recipients. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 160: 607–614 693–702 Starnberger I, Preininger D, Hödl W (2014) From uni- to mul- Zimmermann H, Zimmermann E (1988) Etho-Taxonomie und timodality: towards an integrative view on anuran communi- zoogeographische Artengruppenbildung bei Pfeilgiftfröschen. cation. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 200: 777–787 Salamandra 24: 125–160 Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis C (2008). Seewave: a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18: 213–226

Bonn zoological Bulletin 66 (1): 73–84 ©ZFMK