DOCSLIB.ORG

Obra Completa En

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Obra Completa En FLORA IBERICA FLORA IBERICA Plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares Coordinador General de la obra: S. Castroviejo (Madrid) Vol. VI ROSACEAE Editores: F. Muñoz Garmendia (Madrid) & C. Navarro (Madrid) REAL JARDÍN BOTÁNICO, CSIC Madrid, 1998 CATALOGACIÓN EN PUBLICACIÓN DEL INSTITUTO BIBLIOGRÁFICO HISPÁNICO Flora iberica: plantas vasculares de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares / editores, S. Castroviejo... [et al.]. — Madrid: Real Jardín Botánico, 1986- v. : il. ; 24 cm. Índice Contiene: v. VI. Rosaceae ISBN 84-00-06221-3. 1. Flora-Península Ibérica. VI. Muñoz Garmendia, Félix & Navarro, Carmen, ed. lit. II. Real Jardín Botánico. 581.9(46). 1.ª edición: diciembre 1998 1.ª reimpresión: marzo 1999 © CSIC Servicio de Publicaciones del CSIC Vitruvio, 8 28006 Madrid (España) ISBN: 84-00-06221-3, obra completa ISBN: 84-00-07777-6, tomo VI NIPO: 179-98-085-8 Depósito legal: Impreso en España/Printed in Spain Imprime: GRÁFICAS 85 Gamonal, 5. E-28031 Madrid FLORA IBERICA Patrocinadores: Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e Investigación Científica (DGESIC) y Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Coordinador General de la obra: S. Castroviejo (Madrid) Editores del volumen VI: F. Muñoz Garmendia (Madrid) & C. Navarro (Madrid) Comité Bibliográfico: H.M. Burdet (Ginebra), F. Muñoz Garmendia (Madrid) & P. Perret (Ginebra) Asesores del volumen VI: C. Aedo (Madrid) P. Montserrat (Jaca) C. Aguiar (Braganza) R. Morales (Madrid) I. Aizpuru (San Sebastián) G. Nieto Feliner (Madrid) J.J. Aldasoro (Madrid) C. Obón (Murcia) C. Benedí (Barcelona) J. Paiva (Coimbra) G. Blanca (Granada) A. Pallarés (Almería) J.M. Camarasa (Barcelona) J. Pedrol (Lérida) J. Capelo (Lisboa) J.L. Pérez Chiscano (Villanueva (†)B. Casaseca (Salamanca) de la Serena) S. Castroviejo (Madrid) E. Rico (Salamanca) A. Charpin (Ginebra) D. Rivera (Murcia) M.B. Crespo (Alicante) V. Rodríguez Gracia (Orense) J.A. Devesa (Badajoz) J.A. Rosselló (Valencia) F. Fernández González (Madrid) P. Sánchez Gómez (Murcia) J. do Amaral Franco (Lisboa) A. Segura Zubizarreta (Soria) J. Güemes (Valencia) L. Serra (Alicante) J. Holub (Praga) R.M. Almeida da Silva (Oporto) M. Kerguélen (París) E. Valdés Bermejo (Villagarcía de Arosa) M. Laínz (Gijón) M. Velayos (Madrid) G. Mateo (Valencia) L. Villar (Jaca) Ilustraciones: J.L. Castillo (Madrid), J.M. Pizarro (Madrid), M. Chirino (Madrid) & P. Díaz Alonso (Madrid) Asesor filológico: M. Martínez Pastor (Madrid) AUTORES DE LAS SÍNTESIS GENÉRICAS DEL VOLUMEN VI C. AEDO (Madrid): Amelanchier, Crataegus, Malus, Pyracantha, Pyrus, Sorbus. J.J. ALDASORO (Madrid): Pyrus, Sorbus. G. BLANCA (Granada): Cotoneaster, Prunus. C. DÍAZ DE LA GUARDIA (Granada): Prunus. S.E. FRÖHNER (Nossen): Alchemilla. P. FROST-OLSEN (Skanderborg): Aphanes. A. GUILLÉN (Salamanca): Potentilla (subgen. Comarum, subgen. Fragariastrum y subgen. Trichothalamus) M. LAÍNZ (Gijón): Geum. E. MONASTERIO-HUELIN (Madrid): Rubus. P. MONTSERRAT (Jaca): Rosa. R. MORALES (Madrid): Aruncus, Filipendula, Physocarpus, Sorbaria, Spiraea. F. MUÑOZ GARMENDIA (Madrid): Amelanchier, Crataegus, Cydonia, Dryas, Duchesnea, Eriobotrya, Fragaria, Malus, Mespilus, Pyracantha, Sanguisorba, Sibbaldia. C. NAVARRO (Madrid): Amelanchier, Crataegus, Cydonia, Dryas, Duchesnea, Eriobo- trya, Fragaria, Malus, Mespilus, Pyracantha, Sanguisorba, Sibbaldia. E. RICO (Salamanca): Potentilla (subgen. Potentilla). T. ROMERO MARTÍN (Salamanca): Agrimonia. S. SILVESTRE (Sevilla): Rosa. ÍNDICE GENERAL DEL VOLUMEN VI Preámbulo .......................................................................................................... XI Introducción ....................................................................................................... XIII Expresión de gratitud ......................................................................................... XVI Herbarios básicos y personal de los mismos que ha colaborado en el volu- men VI ......................................................................................................... XIX Floras básicas ..................................................................................................... XXI Abreviaturas o siglas y signos usados en el texto ............................................. XXIII Clave general ..................................................................................................... XXVII Parte descriptiva Div. SPERMATOPHYTA Angiospermae Cl. Magnoliopsida Subcl. Dicotyledones Ord. Rosales LXXXVII. Rosaceae .......................................................... 1 Subfam. Spiraeoideae .................................................. 5 Subfam. Rosoideae ...................................................... 14 Subfam. Maloideae ...................................................... 389 Subfam. Amygdaloideae .............................................. 444 APÉNDICES I. Indicación abreviada –más ampliaciones, etc.– que hacemos de los nom- bres de autores .......................................................................................... 469 II. Indicación abreviada –más equivalencias, etc.– que usamos para las pu- blicaciones periódicas u ocasionales ........................................................ 481 III. Indicación abreviada –más equivalencias, etc.– que usamos para las obras autónomas .................................................................................................. 491 IV. Diccionario de los restrictivos específicos e infraespecíficos considerados correctos, así como de alguna denominación subgenérica y seccional .... 507 V. Relación del contenido de las Notulae taxinomicae... in opus “Flora ibe- rica” intendentes ....................................................................................... 523 ÍNDICES Índice de láminas ............................................................................................... 527 Índice de nombres vernáculos ........................................................................... 531 Índice de nombres científicos ............................................................................ 547 PREÁMBULO Ha pasado algún tiempo desde que se anunció como próximo el presente vo- lumen. A pesar de nuestras claras intenciones en lo referente al cumplimiento de los plazos, no hemos podido cumplirlos. Como excusa fundamental, apunte- mos a las dificultades que presentan diversos géneros de la familia –tan asende- reada en floras, monografías e incluso en trabajos de jardinería–, en los que re- sulta muy ardua la solución de numerosísimos problemas nomenclaturales –e incluso el buceo previo en el océano de la bibliografía. Nos ha sido concedida la financiación de que hablábamos, para el quinque- nio 1998-2002 [Proyecto PB96-0849, del programa Sectorial Promoción Gene- ral del Conocimiento, gestionado por la Subdirección General de Proyectos de Investigación Científica y Técnica, que depende de la Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e Investigación Científica (DGESIC), del Ministerio de Educación y Cultura]; aun cuando no se aprobó el total del presupuesto solicita- do, sí al menos un aceptable porcentaje que, a los cinco equipos (Badajoz, Barcelona, Madrid, Salamanca y Sevilla), ha de permitirles trabajar sin agobios en los cinco referidos años. A más de las decisiones respecto al Comité Editor de cada uno de los volú- menes, anunciadas en 1997, otra que posteriormente se tomó, en forma colegia- da, crea la figura de un Coordinador General de la obra, coincidente con el in- vestigador principal del proyecto –en este momento, S. Castroviejo–, quien ha de ocuparse de “ordenar el tráfico” de rutina y procurar que siempre queden cu- biertas las necesidades perentorias. Los colaboradores no implicados en la edi- ción del presente volumen, lógicamente dedican su tiempo a otros en marcha. Se debe, no obstante, mencionar aquí el apoyo muy especial de C. Aedo y J.J. Aldasoro, en la edición de la subfamilia maloideas, y el de M. Laínz y P. Montserrat, éste concretado en sus correcciones encarnizadas –redaccionales, por de pronto, y de tipo diverso. En lo referente al equipo de conjunto, son reseñables novedades el paso de C. Aedo a Colaborador del CSIC, así como la incorporación esta primavera, como sustituto en las funciones anteriores del precedente y contratado como be- cario del proyecto, del Dr. Llorenç Sáez; y, asimismo, la del Dr. J.J. Aldasoro –que se incorpora por un año, con una licencia para la realización de investiga- ciones en este Centro. Las ilustraciones del volumen son obra de Juan L. Castillo, José M.ª Pizarro y Marta Chirino; más, ocasionalmente, de Pablo Díaz Alonso. Los apéndices bibliográficos no recogen, como en los anteriores, otras referencias que las he- chas en él. XII PREÁMBULO Deploramos la pérdida reciente de nuestro asesor y amigo el Prof. D. Bar- tolomé Casaseca Mena, Catedrático de Botánica de la Facultad de Biología de Salamanca, entusiasta y firme apoyo del proyecto de “Flora iberica” desde sus albores. A buen seguro que vamos a echar en falta los ánimos que siempre nos dio, así como las precisiones que alguna vez nos hizo en punto a terminología descriptiva y vocabulario científico, siempre con el máximo interés por obra que tenía por muy suya. A más de con los Herbarios Básicos (BC, BCF, COI, G, GDA-GDAC, JACA, MA, MAF, MGC, SALA y SEV), en esta ocasión hubo de contarse, al menos alguna vez, con AAU, ABH, AH, ALME, ANG, ARAN, B, BCC, BRESA, BRNM, C, CAS, CAT, COA, E, EMMA, FCO, FI, GH, GZU, HBIL, HGI, JAEN, JE, K, KOR, L, LE, LEB, LISE, LISI, LISU, LISVA, LOU, LY, M, MACB,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Morphological Characteristics Genotypes of Rubus Species on the Slopes of the Alborz
    Science Arena Publications Specialty Journal of Agricultural Sciences ISSN: 2412-737X Available online at www.sciarena.com 2019, Vol 5 (1): 17-24 Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Morphological Characteristics Genotypes of Rubus species on the slopes of the Alborz Mahshid Fakhraee Lahiji1, 2 1 Scientific member, Vegetable Research Center, AREEO, Tehran, Iran. 2 Departments of Seed and Plant Improvement institute, Mohammad Shahr Road, Karaj, Iran. Abstract: Rubus is growing in forests regenerate mainly in a vegetative way; however, detailed studies have shown substantial variability in performance of Rubus individuals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the genetic diversity and genetic grouping of Rubus in Alborz mountains. First year, the regions of Rubus identified, the next year, by referring to pre-determined locations, readings taken. Using the "ward" cluster analysis method based on morphological characteristics were 0.8; genotypes divided in three main groups. The first three components consisted of more than 90% of the total variation. The first component was 0.75, the second component 0.96 and the third component 0.97 variance. The genotype distribution based on factor analysis showed that R.antalicus, R.sanactus in the positive (+1) pc and genetic variants of R.caesius, R.hyrcanus, R.procerus were negative (+2) pc . The R.procerus were negative (-4) for the first factor at the zero- first distance, but in the second factor in the range of +3 to +4 and in the third factor at zero to+1 distance, which indicates that the genotype was weak factor. Based on the results, genotypes of de plot were in a group with more common characteristics, such as R.caesius, R.hyrcanus and R.procerus closed together.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration
    Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration Olympic National Park, Washington Cynthia Lee Riskin A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Horticulture University of Washington 2013 Committee: Linda Chalker-Scott Kern Ewing Sarah Reichard Joshua Chenoweth Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Environmental and Forest Sciences Guidebook to Invasive Nonnative Plants of the Elwha Watershed Restoration Olympic National Park, Washington Cynthia Lee Riskin Master of Environmental Horticulture candidate School of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington, Seattle September 3, 2013 Contents Figures ................................................................................................................................................................. ii Tables ................................................................................................................................................................. vi Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Bromus tectorum L. (BROTEC) ..................................................................................................................... 19 Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (CIRARV)
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers and Karyotypes of Four Species Rubus L
    J Genet Resour2019;5(1): 59-64 Homepage: http://sc.journals.umz.ac.ir/ DOI: 10.22080/jgr.2019.16121.1129 RESEARCH ARTICLE Chromosome Numbers and Karyotypes of Four Species Rubus L. from North of Iran Razieh Kasalkheh1, Eisa Jorjani1*, Hossein Sabouri2, Meisam Habibi1 and Ali Sattarian3 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran 2Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture Science and Natural Resource, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran 3Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture Science and Natural Resource, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Karyotype study was performed across 7 populations of 4 Rubus species Received 10 March 2019 growing in Iran. The results showed that the chromosome numbers of R. Accepted 23 April 2019 sanctus (2n=2x=14) diploid, R. caesius, and R. discolor were (2n=4x=28) Available online 04 May 2019 tetraploids, R. persicus (2n=8x=56) octoploid. The chromosome numbers of R. discolor, and R. persicus were reported here for the first time. Keywords: Karyotypic formula also varied between the studied species, 5m+sm+t Rubus (Joybar population) & 6m+t (Babolsar population) in R. sanctus, 5m+2t in Karyotype R. caesius & R. discolor, 4m+3t in R. persicus. In addition, the four studied Chromosome species showed intrachromosomal (A1; range = 0.38-0.58), and inter- Polyploidy chromosomal (A2; range = 0.10-0.14) asymmetry and they were segregated into 3A (R. sanctus), 3B (R. caesius), 2C (R.
    [Show full text]
  • ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants
    APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Concern APPENDIX 2 List of Species Conservation Reports APPENDIX 3 Rare Species Habitat Group Analysis APPENDIX 4 Rare Plant Communities APPENDIX 5 Plants of Cultural Importance APPENDIX 6 Research, Development, and Applications Database APPENDIX 7 Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Interior Columbia River Basin 122 APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Conservation Concern These range maps were compiled from data from State Heritage Programs in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada. This information represents what was known at the end of the 1994 field season. These maps may not represent the most recent information on distribution and range for these taxa but it does illustrate geographic distribution across the assessment area. For many of these species, this is the first time information has been compiled on this scale. For the continued viability of many of these taxa, it is imperative that we begin to manage for them across their range and across administrative boundaries. Of the 173 taxa analyzed, there are maps for 153 taxa. For those taxa that were not tracked by heritage programs, we were not able to generate range maps. (Antmnnrin aromatica) ( ,a-’(,. .e-~pi~] i----j \ T--- d-,/‘-- L-J?.,: . ey SAP?E%. %!?:,KnC,$ESS -,,-a-c--- --y-- I -&zII~ County Boundaries w1. ~~~~ State Boundaries <ii&-----\ \m;qw,er Columbia River Basin .---__ ,$ 4 i- +--pa ‘,,, ;[- ;-J-k, Assessment Area 1 /./ .*#a , --% C-p ,, , Suecies Locations ‘V 7 ‘\ I, !. / :L __---_- r--j -.---.- Columbia River Basin s-5: ts I, ,e: I’ 7 j ;\ ‘-3 “.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Prairie Species of Western Oregon and Southwestern
    RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE PRAIRIE SPECIES OF WESTERN OREGON AND SOUTHWESTERN WASHINGTON Fender’s blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi) Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens (Willamette daisy) Lomatium bradshawii (Bradshaw’s lomatium) Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Kincaid’s lupine) Sidalcea nelsoniana (Nelson’s checker-mallow) REGION 1 U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PORTLAND, OREGON DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Recovery Plan for the Prairie Species of Western Oregon and Southwestern Washington. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. xi + 241 pp. An electronic version of this recovery plan will also be made available at http://www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html and http://www.fws.gov/endangered/recovery/index.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Diversity of Vascular Plants of Nandiar Valley Western Himalaya, Pakistan
    Pak. J. Bot., Special Issue (S.I. Ali Festschrift) 42: 213-229, 2010. SPECIES DIVERSITY OF VASCULAR PLANTS OF NANDIAR VALLEY WESTERN HIMALAYA, PAKISTAN FAIZ UL HAQ¹, HABIB AHMAD², MUKHTAR ALAM3, ISHTIAQ AHMAD¹ AND RAHATULLAH2 Department of Botany, Government Degree College Battagram, Pakistan¹ Department of Genetics, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan ([email protected])² Directorate Research and Planning, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan3 Abstract Species diversity of Nandiar Valley District Battagram, Pakistan was evaluated with special reference to vascular plant diversity of the area. Floristically the area is placed in Western Himalayan Province. It is located on the western edge of Himalayas, dominated by Sino- Japanese elements. Aim of the study was to document the vascular plant resources, conservation issues and usage of the selected plants. An ethno-botanical survey was also carried out for collecting information regarding the various indigenous uses of the vascular plants in different parts of Nandiar Valley. Field observations showed that vegetation of the area was generally threatened due to unwise of local communities. The trend of urbanization, deforestation, over grazing, habitat fragmentation, unscientific extraction of natural vegetation, introduction of the exotic taxa and habitat loss were the visible threats. Sum 402 taxa belongs to 110 families of vascular plants were evaluated. Among the 402 species reported, 237 species were herbs, 71 shrubs, 68 trees, 06 climbing shrubs, 18 climbers and 03 epiphytes. The plants were classified according to local, traditional and economic value. Based on local uses, there were 178 medicinal plants, 21 were poisonous, 258 were fodder species, 122 were fuel wood species, 37 were timber yielding plants, 41 were thatching and sheltering plants, 29 were hedge plants, 71 were wild ornamental, 100 were weeds, 47 species yield edible fruits and seeds, 43 were used as vegetable and pot herb.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Patterns of Phytodiversity, Ethnobotany, Plant Geography and Vegetation in the Mountains of Miandam, Swat, Northern Pakistan
    EXPLORING PATTERNS OF PHYTODIVERSITY, ETHNOBOTANY, PLANT GEOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION IN THE MOUNTAINS OF MIANDAM, SWAT, NORTHERN PAKISTAN BY Naveed Akhtar M. Phil. Born in Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Academic Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in the Georg-August-University School of Science (GAUSS) under Faculty of Biology Program Biodiversity and Ecology Georg-August-University of Göttingen Göttingen, 2014 ZENTRUM FÜR BIODIVERSITÄT UND NACHHALTIGE LANDNUTZUNG SEKTION BIODIVERSITÄT, ÖKOLOGIE UND NATURSCHUTZ EXPLORING PATTERNS OF PHYTODIVERSITY, ETHNOBOTANY, PLANT GEOGRAPHY AND VEGETATION IN THE MOUNTAINS OF MIANDAM, SWAT, NORTHERN PAKISTAN Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Vorgelegt von M.Phil. Naveed Akhtar aus Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Göttingen, 2014 WHEN WE ARE FIVE AND THE APPLES ARE FOUR MY MOTHER SAYS “I DO NOT LIKE APPLES” DEDICATED TO My Mother Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Erwin Bergmeier Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute ofPlant Sciences Department of Vegetation & Phytodiversity Analysis Georg-August-University of Göttingen Untere Karspüle 2 37073, Göttingen, Germany Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Dirk Hölscher Department of Tropical Silviculture & Forest Ecology Georg-August-University of Göttingen Büsgenweg 1 37077, Göttingen, Germany Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Checklist of District Kotli, Azad Jammu & Kashmir
    Pak. J. Bot ., 47(5): 1957-1968, 2015. FLORISTIC CHECKLIST OF DISTRICT KOTLI, AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR ARSHAD MAHMOOD KHAN 1, RAHMATULLAH QURESHI 1* , MIRZA FAISAL QASEEM 1, MUBASHRAH MUNIR 1, MUHAMMAD ILYAS 1 AND ZAFEER SAQIB 2 1Department of Botany, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan. 2Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan. *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract A comprehensive floristic survey was conducted to record the botanical diversity, ethnotaxonomy and the reproductive phenological response of the vascular flora of the district Kotli, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, Pakistan during 2011-13. A total of 463 plant species belonging to 306 genera and 93 families were recorded. The most dominant families in the study area were Poaceae (54 spp.), Leguminosae (39 spp.), Compositae (33 spp.), Lamiaceae (23 spp.) and Rosaceae (22 spp.), whereas the leading genera were Ficus (8 spp.), Ipomoea, Cyperus, Euphorbia and Solanum (6 spp. each). Use of online taxonomic literature and databases enabled us to document most of the species with their current accepted names, author citations and their placement in the higher taxa. Two different aspects, flowering duration and start of flowering event (or timing) were also recorded. Phenological studies revealed that most of the species found in flowering stage during the August (252 spp.), followed by July (245 spp.), May (239 spp.) and April (237 spp.); while with respect to flowering
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Potential of Orbicules in Angiosperms
    − pISSN 1225-8318 Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 48(1): 9 23 (2018) eISSN 2466-1546 https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2018.48.1.9 Korean Journal of ORIGINAL ARTICLE Plant Taxonomy The phylogenetic potential of orbicules in angiosperms Hye-Kyoung MOON* Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea (Received 21 November 2017; Revised 26 January 2018; Accepted 21 March 2018) ABSTRACT: The distribution of orbicules was investigated for eleven taxa of six genera in Lamiaceae and four taxa of three genera in Verbenaceae using scanning electron microscopy. A literature survey to evaluate the phy- logenetic potential of the orbicules and their possible correlations with tapetum types was also conducted. The orbicules are consistently absent in all investigated taxa of Lamiaceae, while small orbicules of an average size of less than 1 µm are densely distributed in Verbenaceae. In fact, orbicules appear consistently in 123 of 150 angiosperm families when investigated in at least one species. Thus, the distribution patterns of orbicules could be a useful diagnostic character in angiosperms. In addition, orbicules occur in 84% taxa of the secretory tape- tum type, while they are commonly absent in the amoeboid tapetum type (ca. 80%). The presence of orbicules may be correlated with the secretory tapetum type. However, the study of orbicules is restricted in 150 families and the tapetum type within these families can be applied for 92 families out of a total of 416 angiosperm fam- ilies. Thus, further investigation of orbicules is necessary in extended taxa to address the questions pertaining to orbicules. Keywords: orbicules, scanning electron microscopy, tapetum type, angiosperms Pollen morphological traits have been considered as useful shape of orbicules has phylogenetic significance, so orbicules diagnostic characters, since they often provide important clues are drawing keen attention in that they could be the characters to identify plant species and infer their evolutionary history.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Exploration of Saipal Himal, Bajura District, Nepal, 2017
    Botanical Exploration of Saipal Himal, Bajura District, Nepal, 2017. William Hinchliffe, Matt Jackson, Colin Pendry, Hiroshi Ikeda, Polina Gudkova & Jeevan Pandey User [Email address] 0 Figure 1. Meconopsis horridula and Saussurea topkegolensis growing in a gully at 4500m Abstract The Bajura-Saipal Himal expedition was carried out in the Saipal Himal region of Bajura District in western Nepal by staff and affiliates from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE), the Government of Nepal’s Department of Plant Resources (DPR) and the University of Tokyo. The aim of the fieldwork was to collect seed, herbarium specimens, and DNA samples to support the research programmes of DPR and RBGE and contribute to the Flora of Nepal project. The expedition consisted of six members, with three from RBGE, one from DPR, one from the University of Tokyo and one from Altai State University, Russia and affiliated to RBGE to work on the Flora of Nepal. The expedition took place from 4 th -24 th August 2017, starting and finishing in Martadi, Bajura District. 571 herbarium collections and 62 seed collections were made. One new species of Potentilla and possible new Saussurea have been identified so far. Stipa roborowskii and Sehima notatum are new records for Nepal . 1 Contents Abstract................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Contents .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Rosids
    Diversity and Evolution of Rosids . roses, currants, peonies . Eudicots • continue survey through the eudicots or tricolpates • vast majority of eudicots are Rosids (polypetalous) and Asterids core (sympetalous) eudicots rosid asterid Eudicots • unlike Asterids, Rosids (in orange) now represent a diverse set of families *Saxifragales • before examining the large Rosid group, look at a small but important order of flowering plants - Saxifragales Paeonia Sedum *Saxifragales • small group of 16 families and about 2500 species sister to Rosids • ancient lineage from 120 mya and underwent rapid radiation Paeonia Sedum *Saxifragales • part of this ancient radiation may involve this small family of holo-parasites - Cynomoriaceae *Saxifragales • they generally can be identified by their two or more separate or semi-fused carpels, but otherwise quite variable Paeonia Sedum Paeoniaceae 1 genus / 33 species • like many of these families, Paeonia exhibits an Arcto-Tertiary distribution Paeoniaceae 1 genus / 33 species • small shrubs with primitive features of perianth and stamens • hypogynous with 5-8 separate carpels developing into follicles Cercidiphyllaceae 1 genus / 2 species • small trees (kadsura-tree) restricted to eastern China and Japan . • . but fossils in North America and Europe from Tertiary Cercidiphyllaceae 1 genus / 2 species • unisexual, wind-pollinated but do produce follicles Hamamelidaceae 27 genera and 80 species - witch hazels • family of trees and shrubs in subtropical and temperate areas but only 1 species in Wisconsin - witch
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Rosaceae Fruit Types Based on Nuclear Phylogeny in The
    Evolution of Rosaceae Fruit Types Based on Nuclear Phylogeny in the Context of Geological Times and Genome Duplication Yezi Xiang,1,† Chien-Hsun Huang,1,† Yi Hu,2 Jun Wen,3 Shisheng Li,4 Tingshuang Yi,5 Hongyi Chen,4 Jun Xiang,*,4 and Hong Ma*,1 1State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecological Engineering, Institute of Plant Biology, Center of Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China 2Department of Biology, the Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 3The Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 4Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for the Characteristic Resources Exploitation of Dabie Mountains, Hubei Key Laboratory of Economic Forest Germplasm Improvement and Resources Comprehensive Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Huanggang Normal College,Huanggang,Hubei,China 5Plant Germplasm and Genomics Center, Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China †These authors contributed equally to this work. *Corresponding authors: E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] Associate editor: Hongzhi Kong Abstract Fruits are the defining feature of angiosperms, likely have contributed to angiosperm successes by protecting and dis- persing seeds, and provide foods to humans and other animals, with many morphological types and important ecological and agricultural implications. Rosaceae is a family with 3000 species and an extraordinary spectrum of distinct fruits, including fleshy peach, apple, and strawberry prized by their consumers, as well as dry achenetum and follicetum with features facilitating seed dispersal, excellent for studying fruit evolution.
    [Show full text]