DOCSLIB.ORG

ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Concern APPENDIX 2 List of Species Conservation Reports APPENDIX 3 Rare Species Habitat Group Analysis APPENDIX 4 Rare Plant Communities APPENDIX 5 Plants of Cultural Importance APPENDIX 6 Research, Development, and Applications Database APPENDIX 7 Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Interior Columbia River Basin 122 APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Conservation Concern These range maps were compiled from data from State Heritage Programs in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada. This information represents what was known at the end of the 1994 field season. These maps may not represent the most recent information on distribution and range for these taxa but it does illustrate geographic distribution across the assessment area. For many of these species, this is the first time information has been compiled on this scale. For the continued viability of many of these taxa, it is imperative that we begin to manage for them across their range and across administrative boundaries. Of the 173 taxa analyzed, there are maps for 153 taxa. For those taxa that were not tracked by heritage programs, we were not able to generate range maps. (Antmnnrin aromatica) ( ,a-’(,. .e-~pi~] i----j \ T--- d-,/‘-- L-J?.,: . ey SAP?E%. %!?:,KnC,$ESS -,,-a-c--- --y-- I -&zII~ County Boundaries w1. ~~~~ State Boundaries <ii&-----\ \m;qw,er Columbia River Basin .---__ ,$ 4 i- +--pa ‘,,, ;[- ;-J-k, Assessment Area 1 /./ .*#a , --% C-p ,, , Suecies Locations ‘V 7 ‘\ I, !. / :L __---_- r--j -.---.- Columbia River Basin s-5: ts I, ,e: I’ 7 j ;\ ‘-3 “. I.’ - ESTES’ ARTEMISIA thrtamicia Ia,dnvipinnn ssn. estesii) _ ,c---r-d~---i+ 1 ---I----;--:G - --\.Y \,< /J [ 1 p-i k:~~,y~~ -!> ‘i ki L i,: -~~:*;~--~y!-~ j ______ 4---. ----:-!\ -____4~-- ‘-1 : ____;-l,.f\;\-----T-I--1 -----1,--,02-, ---- * eJ----;::::Gff._____I ? I-- ir::--,r:-~~-~-;~ -1: ------*_ T ______ i / 1, ; f- ! t ' '-- - ---____ _ _ i i /- ‘3-,!! if"-' ;-*. ;:$.yYl J \ J/y-i ---~jQ~--"i -1-J. i-e-. -.. ( 3-y-< 1 i ? i A . I !. -5 “2,-A $-T-- j ,;’ ,i i -1 j J. .L .-jI ---__ \. fLj _____---- -) I -.L- t--___+‘y ____ ___ u2=- :: $it _-_ k____ i-- I6 r :i;-;i,;;;;---------ii,. 1_________ 11 i ~~~~:~~~ ___ ;-/ I I ! I----’.__________, \--T--7 . \.* GOOSE CREEK 1MILKvETc.H- --. 1 ,---l-- (Astragalus amer i-iii - ---a.--- I ! I - \ ( 1 1 County Boundaries ! ,f ! t i-4 State Boundaries i I Columbia River Basin Assessment Area Snecies Locations C. i i 7 ---r--~~-~.~i’-----’ -- : I j I.--; i __-- 1 D i 1 i -< I , ,P? i i ‘a \%A L JEFis!t?E ‘;S,c$::FR _ -c-- /----7-I ! I \yp@$------__ A County Boundaries i ,i ‘i i i ______ State Boundaries Columbia River Basin _ Assessment Area Cnmrier l,ncations ,---_-_ f i i---- i 2 ( 1 -5 -! {--, /-: ______-- 5 - -g.)‘i -. ', / L- F--___q I : *T---- PiI--- IT--&.-&- ---_-_ YJ~'"-Jl 1 ,.J 4 i ,, ~,~~~,.~~~ -3:.; -___ -r--- ---7 ,J--i-- i ';. i y ip-<--$ --i 4 -“I,-- iL’.----I---’! .---T ----- --.y I j i- i*____. 1 -g- ! .i: ---_ - _-___ I i I----? __--___--- T 7 \ --_, k Ll i r ;,J c 1 r’ IL:’._ !//kg&- ;y---! \ \* .--L-- y---; J (, -1 5 i i- I 1. / 4I’ 3 j \L. ‘; A ---- ‘:---i--~~~~~~,-?~~--------~ ,‘i, !‘i.-Tew 1 f----p ------ --“-9 r / ,b-A -3: --w-r 1-i -7 1 :;“- ‘%, ‘..- : 1 .I .---- \ i-i<;-;; ,.-. -I--,-j---‘)-- s ,I-\‘*;. ‘c hj- -i ,*!1. I,I’ -;L-, _________ i--.------- r7 # I i ! i v-e ---i--*L~J-iJh .&-I J’? 1, ~J,.c, 1 ; ‘-.L, ,’---------- -_________ +I I.I / I I i----Y - I ___________/ ~<~--~~7~~~;/‘-t*J ‘,x-J--I-’ L 1 ;---7.---_______ _ I 7 -:1 \ :* PICABO MILKVETCH (Astragalus onicif---:-\ I , ,P, I;.*- -21.-’ I*‘,-..- ----_ ir ______ ____ ) / i 1 ;-..: !..... 9 WHITED MILK-VETCH k I. -.--l,,..n n:“..n,,,P\ ._ .- \ .-- -:. -..J h-7.. .; .i _------ r---l ..,. _. ---..---- BASTARD KENTrophyta (Astragalus tegetarioides) cc-p- ” -,--e-y I ! --. I, ” County Boundaries ” State Boundaries rv Columbia River Basin Assessment Area Species Locations TYGW VALLEY MILK-VETC=’LLI (Astragalus tyghensis) _+-c-- --I 1 i i ,i t-1 i : $---’ !I “’ Countv Boundaries ‘J’ State Boundaries- Ev Columbia River Basin Assessment Area Species Locations WAVY MOONWART (Botrychium c-nlllntllml N Columbia River Basin Assessment Area - Snecies Locations I, : ; ____ >A-*ie I ~._ -I rAi - -(Botrychium 1 I JJ ~~~~~-I~~~~-~ ~<l&l~ \; is. ’ i,: ---;l;:> \ 1 ’ 1 I ‘.---} ______ 44 __ /I\ \-- :TqL 3 ..-. +‘--f------~; i I---f i-. --*f+---&--> i,-.- ‘<, /-- ------ f \; ,-j-- ; ;‘-;i_____- i i----c, : -’ -- y-i’ ‘, 1 I ! / & .JJ -, ’ r’ v( \ __.__ #I P‘--- -----____ 4 “\--‘-------.<‘I ii j$ ’ “I 4 . *ey), J-JVI j \ ,f,/+.-i ----$---$ ’ &.yqL~ J-7 !. ;---. y- --___ ? ,L -\ \ rl LJ&’ mL& I, A fLi’c ..____ i LLy-y;- -A’ i ! 2 I I : ‘7 i i------: y’ J-&fJ .b,,- “.*: :i- k--Y.. Z-pl:?-S$iJp~LhT ________ j ____ __ ---- I ! fi ! . i ,A J :-..,j- r’---------LI- ______ ____ ; I e r -I : lum pumlco Pi State Boundaries N Columbia River Basin Assessment Area f; State Boundaries N Columbia River Basin Assessment Area .- .- .- . ‘:. GREEN-TINGED PAINTBRUSH (Castilleja chlorotica) suecies Locations -! “I-‘;-..-~ d_JL-r-i--% j- /--; ________‘f 7 - \,-- ‘..-kL-f-q ‘“\-.-___ i------4i ‘I---- 4--- JLLJq& i-a t-j “I* + _________ iem.-------- J-J&A : ‘7-l \ \ 1 Y; ----- I x+, Lr---(-,/- ,- ‘1r _,--I--\ #-I -- . - _ __ _ _ __ ;tii) -- ,I -,,-A--~-- T-- “’ County Boundaries State Boundaries Columbia River Basin Assessment Area Suecies Locations i 1, - 4 /--- ‘---l~-~ __ &‘“--i_ ‘T : lr, ‘\ \ ---_ : : : I r -x. .,--1 I !: i’ ,’ Y- I c “I T’ i I L le SV County Boundaries -a \ I’; State Boundaries N Columbia River Basin Assessment Area A-------- ;. -+q*‘” 1 yeAy ,;-; !j y-- _._. v-:;, .J-q j \ Je,z!,/rq m-*I i < ,-----_ L ~~--!~~---~~--~~~~~-~-~~-- -------- 5 7,i -,-- i-- \ f$yy _.,sT~~~y--;~~~ 1 7 ,---, j -Js.<i :“*.s-..7-7~~ i $ _____d, ._ ,:I- \ ’ '-‘.,-'j L.. .a- -.\.-. , j--s- ~------J~~~ *-- Tfli ;&:.,i . ..- ~, ,j!--Lml;--l;.: ' ' i--,,-es- I i--, -----~-------.: ,‘. c-- i *-q “‘I/’ I;emm;?+-e-qL;$ yLi ____1 (q--~ i;-.\ i .I I / i .-q- i .$ 4 -2 ..&, . i c [jy---< -L ( ‘> < y---J 1 I-. L--,I . :-.-, _I i :; i i 7: i ::/ I ‘---;~:.l.~J~~~,#!!iy ‘-‘r j i 7 MbU 1 4<;--.r.,-‘,:*‘-+._--*‘-r--n 1 i c UT- i* _________..--* \ ‘t ; ,____* --+-’ I ;--- _._, *. .,:...*j -1 I I ! ! _______.___ I : : : L : II , CA-- ! # -+A-’ \ r 51 ' i q; I----- 'i “1 n I( ,I--' ,.i'-.~-,"~---------f---------- J----q- ,A,---- -- / I _____-------- \* - '\;:j I wm__, --+.-qI- -- ! +' *_ c CUSICK CHAENACTIS (Chaenactis cusickiil i : I L. ! i, Saecies Locations I Assessment Area ;--. c r__o -i---g~T‘~7;C/--‘~-,---._ *-----, ----- 3 i I -.--*-- $---:.m,s -J’ A-1 ( ,4 .A 1 L ; i i I ‘-$ - ‘\.<j $ ” \ -t: ---_ \-,ssv ‘-7,I--i --yi Q----J ‘**--gY )- ..i------- j & _____. *%._ : ---7' ( *‘* ‘..- 2 k-7.. .-. '1 --;I I I-J -L.-9 ,-.-- -\ .: : '-Li .-\, ii _----__ r-1 ,.,&.. __. : :---: \ T--4 ____- f 1.!:,.i # +., .' -\.. J ! .-.-L-a-+ I I . 1. L;-- ~-----r---.2~:~’ i }*., \ “.& ; L,- “4; ,.:‘::>Mm -\ .A. L-, v-q-’ ‘,* ‘: c .’ I 1 *-d, ; ----,---id-.. J i ; ---- rsL ---- ;::pi . _,,+- ,! 1 ‘;-- I 1 : I i 1-P: : ‘! -7 : I -P..--, \ ,.- ‘(’ L-; 7%. L.. f (. , h I. “T ‘-----I I i , ! 74-m I- I ! f I. I iA. ,(! ,>) ‘-2.-a ?---------i,_-.-_----. J I 'r-.-- ! / ! ! --.____-- -_, YELLOW SPRING-BEAUTY (Claytonia lanceolata var. flava) 7 --__ - Columbia River Basin Assessment Area ,. -3:. .,--*-, '1 m‘)-$lS'----- 2. _ f imAJ7-. “\,-- f. .-.---I ---!7 1 -----r------.: Jo -L-- ! ; I 1.:;,,/! --\‘i / \GL ‘-"-J<d,-m ji'~~~~~--~-~-;-,--i~l,. ‘1 j z’ /f‘ I f “‘, t-i I____, ;---,:II __-- j T--im,-i_ _ ;;--;--L----;I’ : : -‘y--” I I-.; I ------i i- 1 *-“-7 I ~---,-;,~..-;~.~~~ &‘% ‘q ‘!-. :;- 1 i-i ___, Jl Iii i I I dltil i i T---- 1 i 9 r I I ! -,--L&.~.L+-yy-j J i i :\ i ,A ‘I. *-’ p--------i, __________ J i 1’ -21, ‘Lt c- ! _________-- --* \< ‘? ‘** ,-Y&-.;,?i ‘!‘ / i ;---, .,,&\J ,2- ( L / , .__________( \---i---7 \ !* Y MT. MAZAMA COLLOMIA (Collomia mazama) Y \ Columbia River Basin Assessment Area Species Locations 1 ( ,,-. 1. !; i’ I’1, 3 j \ ‘-1 , 22 :-._ .J.-’ ;’---------Jr _______ ___ 4 / I L BARREN VALLEY COLLOMIA.^ 1 (Collomia renacta) _ ------ ---, -3! ,” County Boundaries rr’ State Boundaries N Columbia River Basin Assessment Area - SueciesL Locations ‘L. :I ! :.4*..-~I-. ‘4* j ______ $----’ :=.IL \- ‘:<A-p-, *Jy--- I - i i 1 j-+*;y -------- f ---- - __--- / I i ; ----3.______--- -_ I I 9 z%A B, IF-.-GREELEY’S ..-rC,br..r nnn,,I;P CYMO~~fppljnS,,,m\x?Pn. Ia River Basin Assessment Area ‘Clvmnnterrrs davisii) ,,,----Y--7 --- 11 I ” County Boundaries Pr’ State Boundaries N Columbia River Basin _ Assessment Area - Soecies Locations -x.. ,---8 %. '1 1. .: --I ,r ' 1. ,,)..- I - c DOUGLASS’ BISCUITROOT (Cymopterus douelassii) . i t. f 1-i I \ ( I) ‘1 i i- ___ { . *- - +\h\-y - s )I i. i _ ’ i,: peciesWm., 1, Locations\ i ’ ’I I ~~ i 0’ ,r 1 ;- &* ________- 7 ” -1 ,--I i &~kLq >-- --L&mm-~>k . .--J----4 i&i, :,.J q.Jpb*;!-~ k... HAYDEN’S CYMOPTERUS \-J/Cvmnnternlc .,.“p’V. ..” -I-.nivnlis) ----, I County Boundaries Pr’ State Boundaries 1~~~ \ __ ,--. Af Columbia River Basin ! *. .- c i 1’ Assessment Area .+. L-- . Species Locations -x.I- /-*\ Is 1; i’ * _ T- ;: ?- i c- 7’ - 3 CL;JW~-XEJ)_LADY SLIPPER x%>I 1, C.-b”An..la+,.m> I ,:- .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U·M·I University Microfilms International a 8Ell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road
    Patterns of homoplasy in North American Astragalus L. (Fabaceae). Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Sanderson, Michael John. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 18:39:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/184764 INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photo­ graph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UIVn a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are re­ produced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Rubus Arcticus Ssp. Acaulis Is Also Appreciated
    Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, October 18). Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/rubusarcticussspacaulis.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions mentioned in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, in particular Bonnie Heidel, and the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Anderson, for their generosity in making their records available. The data provided by Lynn Black of the DAO Herbarium and National Vascular Plant Identification Service in Ontario, Marta Donovan and Jenifer Penny of the British Columbia Conservation Data Center, Jane Bowles of University of Western Ontario Herbarium, Dr. Kadri Karp of the Aianduse Instituut in Tartu, Greg Karow of the Bighorn National Forest, Cathy Seibert of the University of Montana Herbarium, Dr. Anita Cholewa of the University of Minnesota Herbarium, Dr. Debra Trock of the Michigan State University Herbarium, John Rintoul of the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, and Prof. Ron Hartman and Joy Handley of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium at Laramie, were all very valuable in producing this assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Region 1 Milkweed and Monarch Monitoring Geodatabase User Guide
    Region 1 Milkweed and Monarch Monitoring Geodatabase User Guide Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Data Model Description ................................................................................................................................ 3 Procedures for Checking Out and Checking in ArcPad Layers for Field Data Collection .............................. 4 Prepare files for check out to mobile device ............................................................................................ 6 Load the data to the GPS Unit ................................................................................................................ 11 ArcPad Instructions ..................................................................................................................................... 13 All Form Properties ................................................................................................................................. 16 Grid Properties Form* ............................................................................................................................ 16 Habitat Association Form* ...................................................................................................................... 17 Management Actions Form .................................................................................................................... 19 Milkweed*..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List
    Ventura County Planning Division 2018 Locally Important Plant List Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Abronia turbinata Torr. ex S. Consortium of California Turbinate Sand-verbena A/PH Nyctaginaceae 2 Watson Herbaria Acanthoscyphus parishii var. abramsii (E.A. McGregor) Consortium of California Abrams' Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 1B.2 4-5 Reveal [synonym: Oxytheca Herbaria parishii var. abramsii] Acanthoscyphus parishii Consortium of California Parish Oxytheca AH Polygonaceae CRPR 4.2 1 (Parry) Small var. parishii Herbaria Acmispon glaber var. Consortium of California brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet Short Deerweed PH Fabaceae 1 Herbaria Acmispon heermannii Heermann Lotus or Consortium of California (Durand & Hilg.) Brouillet var. PH Fabaceae 4 Hosackia Herbaria heermannii Acmispon heermannii var. Roundleaf Heermann Consortium of California PH Fabaceae 1 orbicularis (A. Gray) Brouillet Lotus or Hosackia Herbaria Acmispon junceus (Bentham) Consortium of California Rush Hosackia AH Fabaceae 2 Brouillet var. junceus Herbaria 1 Locally Important Plant List- Dec. 2018 Number of Scientific Name Common Name Habit Family Federal/State Status Occurrences in Source Ventura County Acmispon micranthus (Torrey Consortium of California Grab Hosackia or Lotus AH Fabaceae 3 & A. Gray) Brouillet Herbaria Acmispon parviflorus Consortium of California Tiny Lotus AH Fabaceae 2 (Bentham) D.D. Sokoloff Herbaria Consortium of California Agrostis hallii Vasey Hall's Bentgrass PG Poaceae 1 Herbaria Common or Broadleaf Consortium of California Alisma plantago-aquaticum L. PH Alismataceae 4 Water-plantain Herbaria Consortium of California Allium amplectens Torrey Narrowleaf Onion PG Alliaceae 1 Herbaria Allium denticulatum (Traub) Consortium of California Dentate Fringed Onion PG Alliaceae 1 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside State Park
    Provisonal Report Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park Pacific Biodiversity Institute 2 Provisonal Report Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park Peter H. Morrison [email protected] George Wooten [email protected] Juliet Rhodes [email protected] Robin O’Quinn, Ph.D. [email protected] Hans M. Smith IV [email protected] January 2009 Pacific Biodiversity Institute P.O. Box 298 Winthrop, Washington 98862 509-996-2490 Recommended Citation Morrison, P.H., G. Wooten, J. Rhodes, R. O’Quinn and H.M. Smith IV, 2008. Provisional Report: Rare Plant and Vegetation Survey of Riverside State Park. Pacific Biodiversity Institute, Winthrop, Washington. 433 p. Acknowledgements Diana Hackenburg and Alexis Monetta assisted with entering and checking the data we collected into databases. The photographs in this report were taken by Peter Morrison, Robin O’Quinn, Geroge Wooten, and Diana Hackenburg. Project Funding This project was funded by the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 3 Executive Summary Pacific Biodiversity Institute (PBI) conducted a rare plant and vegetation survey of Riverside State Park (RSP) for the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (WSPRC). RSP is located in Spokane County, Washington. A large portion of the park is located within the City of Spokane. RSP extends along both sides of the Spokane River and includes upland areas on the basalt plateau above the river terraces. The park also includes the lower portion of the Little Spokane River and adjacent uplands. The park contains numerous trails, campgrounds and other recreational facilities. The park receives a tremendous amount of recreational use from the nearby population.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Session Abstracts ORALS–MONDAY 102Nd Annual International Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science Las Vegas, Nevada
    Oral Session Abstracts ORALS–MONDAY 102nd Annual International Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science Las Vegas, Nevada Presenting authors are denoted by an astrisk (*) the CP treatment had a higher Area Under the Disease Progress Curve than the NST treatment in tomato in 2003. Overall, disease pressure was highest in tomato in 2001. But disease levels within years were Oral Session 1—Organic Horticulture mostly unaffected by amendment treatments. In cabbage, disease was more common in 2002 than in 2003, although head rot was more Moderator: Matthew D. Kleinhenz prevalent in compost-amended plots in 2003 than in manure-amended 18 July 2005, 2:00–4:00 p.m. Ballroom H or control plots. Tomato postharvest quality parameters were similar among amendment and weed treatments within each year. Soil amend- Weed Control in Organic Vegetable Production: The Use ment may enhance crop yield and quality in a transitional-organic of Sweet Corn Transplants and Vinegar system. Also, weed management strategy can alter weed populations and perhaps disease levels. Albert H. Markhart, III *1, Milton J. Harr 2, Paul Burkhouse 3 Consumer Sensory Evaluation of Organically and Con- 1University of Minnesota, Horticultural Science, 223 Alderman Hall, St. Paul, MN, 55108; 2Southwest State University, Southwest Research and Outreach Center, Lamberton, MN, ventionally Grown Spinach 56512; 3Farm, Foxtail Farm, Shafer, MN, 55074 Xin Zhao *1, Edward E. Carey 1, Fadi M. Aramouni2 Weed control in organic vegetable production is a major challenge. 1Kansas State University, Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources, 2021 Throck- During Summer 2004, we conducted fi eld trials to manage weeds in morton Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506; 2Kansas State University, Animal Sciences and organic sweet corn, carrots and onions.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora, Bryce
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 ON THE COVER Matted prickly-phlox (Leptodactylon caespitosum), Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah. Photograph by Walter Fertig. Annotated Checklist of Vascular Flora Bryce Canyon National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCPN/NRTR–2009/153 Author Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting 1117 W. Grand Canyon Dr. Kanab, UT 84741 Sarah Topp Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Northern Colorado Plateau Network P.O. Box 848 Moab, UT 84532 January 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science Volume 93 2014
    Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science Volume 93 2014 Published by the South Dakota Academy of Science Academy Founded 22 November, 1915 Academy Website: http://sdaos.org Editor Robert Tatina Associate Editors Michael Barnes, SD Game, Fish and Parks, Fisheries Dave Bergmann, Black Hills State University, Microbiology Steve Chipps, South Dakota State University, Wildlife Andy Detwiler, SD School of Mines and Technology, Atmospheric Science Andy Farke, Raymond M. Alf Museum, Paleontology Tom Gray, Mount Marty College, Chemistry Donna Hazelwood, Dakota State University, Botany Tim Mullican, Dakota Wesleyan University, Zoology Jeffrey Palmer, Dakota State University, Mathematics Fedora Sutton, South Dakota State University, Molecular Biology Graphic Designer Tom Holmlund Minuteman Press Sioux Falls, SD Copies of articles are available at EBSCO host and at http://sdaos.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Combined Minutes of the 99Th Annual Meeting of the South Dakota Academy of Science ............................................................................................... 1 Presidential Address: There is Always Room for You in Science. Chun Wu. .................. 9 Keynote Address: Autonomous Systems. Richard Gowan ........................................... 11 Senior Research and Symposium Papers Presented at the 99th Annual Meeting of the South Dakota Academy of Science Permeability of the Inyan Kara Group in the Black Hills Area and Its Relevance to a Proposed In-Situ Leach Uranium Mine. Perry H. Rahn.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Species with Documented Or Recorded Occurrence in Placer County
    A PPENDIX II Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County APPENDIX II. Vascular Plant Species with Documented or Reported Occurrence in Placer County Family Scientific Name Common Name FERN AND FERN ALLIES Azollaceae Mosquito fern family Azolla filiculoides Pacific mosquito fern Dennstaedtiaceae Bracken family Pteridium aquilinum var.pubescens Bracken fern Dryopteridaceae Wood fern family Athyrium alpestre var. americanum Alpine lady fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Lady fern Cystopteris fragilis Fragile fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. curtum Cliff sword fern Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricate sword fern Polystichum kruckebergii Kruckeberg’s hollyfern Polystichum lonchitis Northern hollyfern Polystichum munitum Sword fern Equisetaceae Horsetail family Equisetum arvense Common horsetail Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Scouring rush Equisetum laevigatum Smooth horsetail Isoetaceae Quillwort family Isoetes bolanderi Bolander’s quillwort Isoetes howellii Howell’s quillwort Isoetes orcuttii Orcutt’s quillwort Lycopodiaceae Club-moss family Lycopodiella inundata Bog club-moss Marsileaceae Marsilea family Marsilea vestita ssp. vestita Water clover Pilularia americana American pillwort Ophioglossaceae Adder’s-tongue family Botrychium multifidum Leathery grapefern Polypodiaceae Polypody family Polypodium hesperium Western polypody Pteridaceae Brake family Adiantum aleuticum Five-finger maidenhair Adiantum jordanii Common maidenhair fern Aspidotis densa Indian’s dream Cheilanthes cooperae Cooper’s
    [Show full text]
  • Trees, Shrubs, and Perennials That Intrigue Me (Gymnosperms First
    Big-picture, evolutionary view of trees and shrubs (and a few of my favorite herbaceous perennials), ver. 2007-11-04 Descriptions of the trees and shrubs taken (stolen!!!) from online sources, from my own observations in and around Greenwood Lake, NY, and from these books: • Dirr’s Hardy Trees and Shrubs, Michael A. Dirr, Timber Press, © 1997 • Trees of North America (Golden field guide), C. Frank Brockman, St. Martin’s Press, © 2001 • Smithsonian Handbooks, Trees, Allen J. Coombes, Dorling Kindersley, © 2002 • Native Trees for North American Landscapes, Guy Sternberg with Jim Wilson, Timber Press, © 2004 • Complete Trees, Shrubs, and Hedges, Jacqueline Hériteau, © 2006 They are generally listed from most ancient to most recently evolved. (I’m not sure if this is true for the rosids and asterids, starting on page 30. I just listed them in the same order as Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II.) This document started out as my personal landscaping plan and morphed into something almost unwieldy and phantasmagorical. Key to symbols and colored text: Checkboxes indicate species and/or cultivars that I want. Checkmarks indicate those that I have (or that one of my neighbors has). Text in blue indicates shrub or hedge. (Unfinished task – there is no text in blue other than this text right here.) Text in red indicates that the species or cultivar is undesirable: • Out of range climatically (either wrong zone, or won’t do well because of differences in moisture or seasons, even though it is in the “right” zone). • Will grow too tall or wide and simply won’t fit well on my property.
    [Show full text]