DOCSLIB.ORG

Recovery Plan for Prairie Species of Western Oregon and Southwestern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recovery Plan for Prairie Species of Western Oregon and Southwestern RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE PRAIRIE SPECIES OF WESTERN OREGON AND SOUTHWESTERN WASHINGTON Fender’s blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi) Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens (Willamette daisy) Lomatium bradshawii (Bradshaw’s lomatium) Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Kincaid’s lupine) Sidalcea nelsoniana (Nelson’s checker-mallow) REGION 1 U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PORTLAND, OREGON DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citation should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Recovery Plan for the Prairie Species of Western Oregon and Southwestern Washington. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. xi + 241 pp. An electronic version of this recovery plan will also be made available at http://www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html and http://www.fws.gov/endangered/recovery/index.html. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This recovery plan was prepared by staff biologists from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, with input and guidance from the Recovery Team and consultants to the team. We thank the Recovery Team and consultants for generously sharing their time and expertise over the years to develop a sound recovery plan for the region’s rare prairie species. Recovery Team: Tom Kaye, Institute for Applied Ecology (team co-leader) Cheryl Schultz, Washington State University, Vancouver (team co-leader) Joseph Arnett, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program Jock Beall, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Willamette Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex Florence Caplow, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Natural Heritage Program Kelly R. Dirksen, The Confederated Tribes of the Grande Ronde Community of Oregon Steve Gisler, Oregon Department of Transportation Judy Lantor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Washington Office Andrew F. Robinson, Jr., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Office (retired) Dave Vesely, Pacific Wildlife Research, Inc. Nancy Wogen, Bureau of Land Management, Eugene District Consultants to the Recovery Team: Ed Alverson, The Nature Conservancy Kat Beal, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Lynda Boyer, Heritage Seedlings Dick Brainerd, Salix Associates Deborah Clark, Oregon State University Elizabeth Crone, University of Montana Rebecca Currin, Oregon State University Peter Dunwiddie, The Nature Conservancy Greg Fitzpatrick, The Nature Conservancy Ed Guerrant, The Berry Botanic Garden Paul Hammond, Oregon State University Bob Hansen, Marion County Public Works Department (retired) James Kagan, Oregon Natural Heritage Program Keith Karoly, Reed College Wes Messinger, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bruce Newhouse, Salix Associates Nathan Rudd, The Nature Conservancy Paul Severns, Oregon State University Sally Villegas, Bureau of Land Management Mark Wilson, Oregon State University Eric Wold, City of Eugene iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CURRENT SPECIES STATUS This recovery plan addresses one listed butterfly and four listed plants: Fender’s blue butterfly Icaricia icarioides fenderi Endangered Willamette daisy Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens Endangered Bradshaw’s lomatium Lomatium bradshawii Endangered Kincaid’s lupine Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii Threatened Nelson’s checker-mallow Sidalcea nelsoniana Threatened This recovery plan also provides conservation measures specific to the Willamette Valley for Castilleja levisecta (golden paintbrush), a threatened species for which a recovery plan was published in 2000. In addition, the recovery plan addresses one candidate species and six nonlisted species of conservation concern: Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha taylori), Delphinium leucophaeum (pale larkspur), Delphinium oreganum (Willamette Valley larkspur), Delphinium pavonaceum (peacock larkspur), Horkelia congesta ssp. congesta (shaggy horkelia), Sericocarpus rigidus (white-topped aster), and Sisyrinchium hitchcockii (Hitchcock’s blue-eyed grass). HABITAT REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITING FACTORS The prairie species addressed in this recovery plan occur on upland prairies and grasslands, and in wet prairies that range from southwestern Washington south through the Willamette Valley and into the Umpqua Valley in Oregon. They are all threatened by the continued degradation, loss, and fragmentation of their native prairie ecosystems. RECOVERY STRATEGY The strategy to achieve the recovery of Fender’s blue butterfly, Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens, Lomatium bradshawii, Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii, and Sidalcea nelsoniana is to restore and maintain multiple viable populations of the species by protecting, restoring, maintaining, and connecting the remaining fragments of prairie habitats or areas with potential for restoration to prairie habitats within their historical range. These areas should be restored to functional prairie ecosystems with management that restores and maintains a diversity of native species typical of these prairie communities. The primary threats to be addressed through this recovery strategy are habitat destruction, isolation and fragmentation, invasion by non-native plant species, and iv succession. The recovery plan also recommends actions to help better understand and respond to potential threats posed by changing climate conditions in the region. RECOVERY GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND CRITERIA Specific recovery goals for the five listed species are as follows: Fender’s blue butterfly – reclassify from endangered to threatened, and then delist. Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens – reclassify from endangered to threatened, and then delist. Lomatium bradshawii – reclassify from endangered to threatened, and delist. Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii – delist. Sidalcea nelsoniana – delist. Other goals of this recovery plan are to ensure the long-term conservation of Castilleja levisecta in the Willamette Valley and to conserve the candidate species and other nonlisted species of conservation concern in prairie habitats within the range of this plan such that listing is not necessary. The objective of the recovery program is to achieve viable populations of the listed species distributed across their historical ranges in a series of interconnected populations; this will be accomplished by establishing networks of restored prairie reserves across the geographic range of this recovery plan. For Fender’s blue butterfly, three recovery zones have been delineated that encompass the historical range of the species. To delist Fender’s blue butterfly, we set an extinction risk threshold of 95 percent probability of persistence for 100 years. This standard may be achieved with a variety of combinations of networks and independent populations in each of the three recovery zones. Populations that do not drop below a minimum threshold must be maintained for at least 10 years at all functioning networks and independent populations to meet the delisting criteria. The habitat that supports the populations must be managed for high quality prairie habitat, and must be in secure, conservation-oriented ownership, with management and monitoring to control threats. For the listed plants, we have delineated 10 recovery zones that cover the geographic range of the species. Recovery criteria for each of the listed plants specify the number and size of populations in each recovery zone, the distribution of subpopulations that make up the populations, evidence of a stable or increasing population trend for at least 15 years, and evidence of reproduction. The habitat that supports the populations must be managed for high quality prairie habitat, and must be in secure, conservation-oriented v ownership, with management and monitoring to control threats. In addition, genetic material must be banked in a facility approved by the Center for Plant Conservation. ACTIONS NEEDED Actions needed to recover Fender’s blue butterfly: 1. Preserve, restore, and manage existing populations and habitat for Fender’s blue butterfly. 2. Coordinate management with recovery efforts for Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii, the larval host plant for Fender’s blue butterfly. 3. Implement a standardized population monitoring protocol. 4. Monitor prairie quality and diversity at all population sites. 5. Reintroduce populations and restore habitat, as necessary, to meet recovery goals. 6. Implement further research needed for the conservation of the species. 7. Develop a post-delisting monitoring plan prior to delisting. Actions needed to recover Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens, Lomatium bradshawii, Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii, and Sidalcea nelsoniana: 1. Preserve, restore, and manage existing populations and habitat. 2. Develop and implement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant List Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail
    *Non-native Bristow Prairie & High Divide Trail Plant List as of 7/12/2016 compiled by Tanya Harvey T24S.R3E.S33;T25S.R3E.S4 westerncascades.com FERNS & ALLIES Pseudotsuga menziesii Ribes lacustre Athyriaceae Tsuga heterophylla Ribes sanguineum Athyrium filix-femina Tsuga mertensiana Ribes viscosissimum Cystopteridaceae Taxaceae Rhamnaceae Cystopteris fragilis Taxus brevifolia Ceanothus velutinus Dennstaedtiaceae TREES & SHRUBS: DICOTS Rosaceae Pteridium aquilinum Adoxaceae Amelanchier alnifolia Dryopteridaceae Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea Holodiscus discolor Polystichum imbricans (Sambucus mexicana, S. cerulea) Prunus emarginata (Polystichum munitum var. imbricans) Sambucus racemosa Rosa gymnocarpa Polystichum lonchitis Berberidaceae Rubus lasiococcus Polystichum munitum Berberis aquifolium (Mahonia aquifolium) Rubus leucodermis Equisetaceae Berberis nervosa Rubus nivalis Equisetum arvense (Mahonia nervosa) Rubus parviflorus Ophioglossaceae Betulaceae Botrychium simplex Rubus ursinus Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata Sceptridium multifidum (Alnus sinuata) Sorbus scopulina (Botrychium multifidum) Caprifoliaceae Spiraea douglasii Polypodiaceae Lonicera ciliosa Salicaceae Polypodium hesperium Lonicera conjugialis Populus tremuloides Pteridaceae Symphoricarpos albus Salix geyeriana Aspidotis densa Symphoricarpos mollis Salix scouleriana Cheilanthes gracillima (Symphoricarpos hesperius) Salix sitchensis Cryptogramma acrostichoides Celastraceae Salix sp. (Cryptogramma crispa) Paxistima myrsinites Sapindaceae Selaginellaceae (Pachystima myrsinites)
    [Show full text]
  • Likely to Have Habitat Within Iras That ALLOW Road
    Item 3a - Sensitive Species National Master List By Region and Species Group Not likely to have habitat within IRAs Not likely to have Federal Likely to have habitat that DO NOT ALLOW habitat within IRAs Candidate within IRAs that DO Likely to have habitat road (re)construction that ALLOW road Forest Service Species Under NOT ALLOW road within IRAs that ALLOW but could be (re)construction but Species Scientific Name Common Name Species Group Region ESA (re)construction? road (re)construction? affected? could be affected? Bufo boreas boreas Boreal Western Toad Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Plethodon vandykei idahoensis Coeur D'Alene Salamander Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Rana pipiens Northern Leopard Frog Amphibian 1 No Yes Yes No No Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Ammodramus bairdii Baird's Sparrow Bird 1 No No Yes No No Anthus spragueii Sprague's Pipit Bird 1 No No Yes No No Centrocercus urophasianus Sage Grouse Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Cygnus buccinator Trumpeter Swan Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Falco peregrinus anatum American Peregrine Falcon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Gavia immer Common Loon Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Histrionicus histrionicus Harlequin Duck Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Oreortyx pictus Mountain Quail Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Otus flammeolus Flammulated Owl Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides albolarvatus White-Headed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Picoides arcticus Black-Backed Woodpecker Bird 1 No Yes Yes No No Speotyto cunicularia Burrowing
    [Show full text]
  • Leiberg's Fleabane, Erigeron Leibergii
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Leiberg’s Fleabane Erigeron leibergii in Canada DATA DEFICIENT 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Leiberg’s Fleabane Erigeron leibergii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 22 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC acknowledges Matt Fairbarns for writing the status report on Leiberg’s Fleabane, Erigeron leibergii, in Canada, prepared with the financial support of Environment & Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Del Meidinger, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Nom de l’espèce (Erigeron leibergii) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Leiberg’s Fleabane — Photo credit: Matt Fairbarns. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/748-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07805-2 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Leiberg’s Fleabane Scientific name Erigeron leibergii Status Data Deficient Reason for designation This perennial herb has only been collected from one site in south central British Columbia; field surveys suggest that it may have been lost from that site.
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for the Fender's Blue Butterfly
    Tuesday, October 31, 2006 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Fender’s blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides fenderi), Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Kincaid’s lupine), and Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens (Willamette daisy); Final Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:08 Oct 30, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\31OCR2.SGM 31OCR2 rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES_2 63862 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 210 / Tuesday, October 31, 2006 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Role of Critical Habitat in Actual future consultations that analyze Practice of Administering and impacts to designated critical habitat, Fish and Wildlife Service Implementing the Act particularly those that appear to be Attention to and protection of habitat resulting in an adverse modification 50 CFR Part 17 is paramount to successful conservation determination. Such consultations will actions. The role that designation of be reviewed by the Regional Office prior RIN 1018–AT91 critical habitat plays in protecting to finalizing to ensure that an adequate habitat of listed species, however, is analysis has been conducted that is Endangered and Threatened Wildlife often misunderstood. As discussed in informed by the Director’s guidance. On the other hand, to the extent that and Plants; Designation of Critical more detail below in the discussion of designation of critical habitat provides Habitat for the Fender’s blue butterfly exclusions under ESA section 4(b)(2), protection, that protection can come at (Icaricia icarioides fenderi), Lupinus there are significant limitations on the significant social and economic cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany Biological Evaluation
    APPENDIX I Botany Biological Evaluation Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi Page 1 of 35 for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project November 2009 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE – FOREST SERVICE LAKE TAHOE BASIN MANAGEMENT UNIT Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project El Dorado County, CA Biological Evaluation for Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Plants and Fungi PREPARED BY: ENTRIX, Inc. DATE: November 2009 APPROVED BY: DATE: _____________ Name, Forest Botanist, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit SUMMARY OF EFFECTS DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND/OR REQUIREMENTS One population of a special-status bryophyte, three-ranked hump-moss (Meesia triquetra), was observed in the survey area during surveys on June 30, 2008 and August 28, 2008. The proposed action will not affect the moss because the population is located outside the project area where no action is planned. The following species of invasive or noxious weeds were identified during surveys of the Project area: cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); bullthistle (Cirsium vulgare); Klamathweed (Hypericum perforatum); oxe-eye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare); and common mullein (Verbascum Thapsus). The threat posed by these weed populations would not increase if the proposed action is implemented. An inventory and assessment of invasive and noxious weeds in the survey area is presented in the Noxious Weed Risk Assessment for the Upper Truckee River Sunset Stables Restoration Project (ENTRIX 2009). Based on the description of the proposed action and the evaluation contained herein, we have determined the following: There would be no significant effect to plant species listed as threatened, endangered, proposed for listing, or candidates under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), administered by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Bees and belonging: Pesticide detection for wild bees in California agriculture and sense of belonging for undergraduates in a mentorship program Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8z91q49s Author Ward, Laura True Publication Date 2020 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Bees and belonging: Pesticide detection for wild bees in California agriculture and sense of belonging for undergraduates in a mentorship program By Laura T Ward A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nicholas J. Mills, Chair Professor Erica Bree Rosenblum Professor Eileen A. Lacey Fall 2020 Bees and belonging: Pesticide detection for wild bees in California agriculture and sense of belonging for undergraduates in a mentorship program © 2020 by Laura T Ward Abstract Bees and belonging: Pesticide detection for wild bees in California agriculture and sense of belonging for undergraduates in a mentorship program By Laura T Ward Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Nicholas J. Mills, Chair This dissertation combines two disparate subjects: bees and belonging. The first two chapters explore pesticide exposure for wild bees and honey bees visiting crop and non-crop plants in northern California agriculture. The final chapter utilizes surveys from a mentorship program as a case study to analyze sense of belonging among undergraduates. The first chapter of this dissertation explores pesticide exposure for wild bees and honey bees visiting sunflower crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Plant List Douglas County by Scientific Name
    The NatureMapping Program Washington Plant List Revised: 9/15/2011 Douglas County by Scientific Name (1) Non- native, (2) ID Scientific Name Common Name Plant Family Invasive √ 763 Acer glabrum Douglas maple Aceraceae 800 Alisma graminium Narrowleaf waterplantain Alismataceae 19 Alisma plantago-aquatica American waterplantain Alismataceae 1087 Rhus glabra Sumac Anacardiaceae 650 Rhus radicans Poison ivy Anacardiaceae 29 Angelica arguta Sharp-tooth angelica Apiaceae 809 Angelica canbyi Canby's angelica Apiaceae 915 Cymopteris terebinthinus Turpentine spring-parsley Apiaceae 167 Heracleum lanatum Cow parsnip Apiaceae 991 Ligusticum grayi Gray's lovage Apiaceae 709 Lomatium ambiguum Swale desert-parsley Apiaceae 997 Lomatium canbyi Canby's desert-parsley Apiaceae 573 Lomatium dissectum Fern-leaf biscuit-root Apiaceae 582 Lomatium geyeri Geyer's desert-parsley Apiaceae 586 Lomatium gormanii Gorman's desert-parsley Apiaceae 998 Lomatium grayi Gray's desert-parsley Apiaceae 999 Lomatium hambleniae Hamblen's desert-parsley Apiaceae 609 Lomatium macrocarpum Large-fruited lomatium Apiaceae 1000 Lomatium nudicaule Pestle parsnip Apiaceae 634 Lomatium triternatum Nine-leaf lomatium Apiaceae 474 Osmorhiza chilensis Sweet-cicely Apiaceae 264 Osmorhiza occidentalis Western sweet-cicely Apiaceae 1044 Osmorhiza purpurea Purple sweet-cicely Apiaceae 492 Sanicula graveolens Northern Sierra) sanicle Apiaceae 699 Apocynum androsaemifolium Spreading dogbane Apocynaceae 813 Apocynum cannabinum Hemp dogbane Apocynaceae 681 Asclepias speciosa Showy milkweed Asclepiadaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Idell Weydemeyer's Native Plants TREES SHRUBS & SUBSHRUBS
    Idell Weydemeyer’s Native Plants 11-04 Note: • All plants on here are drought resistant except those originating in moist areas. Some will die if given summer water. Sun required unless shade is mentioned. • “LOCAL” means found growing in Idell’s garden or within 100 yards; “Local” means growing within ten miles from the garden. • Thr & Endgr refers to plant posting on Threatened or Endangered List. • There is disagreement among authors as to the range or locations for various plants. TREES Native Plant Common Name Location Aesculus californica California Buckeye LOCAL; Central Coast Ranges to Sierras & Tehachapis; in woodlands, forests & chaparral; on dry slopes & canyons near water; takes clay; deciduous by July or August Arbutus menziesii Madrone Coast Ranges from Baja to British Columbia & N. Sierras; wooded slopes & canyons; full sun to high afternoon shade, well drained acidic soil Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar Oregon to Baja, Nevada & Utah; sandy to clay soil Cercidium floridum Palo Verde California, Arizona, Mexico & Central America; Southern California desert in creosote bush Blue Palo Verde scrub & Colorado Desert (in CA) below 3,000 feet; by dry creeks with water in summer & winter, perfect drainage, no summer water; deciduous part of year Pinus (possibly jeffreyi) Jeffrey Pine Platanus racemosa California Sycamore Coast Ranges & foothills in warmer parts of CA; along creeks; drought tolerant only with high Western Sycamore water table or along coast, tolerates full sun, part shade, seasonal flooding, sand & clay soil; deciduous in fall & winter Populus Cottonwood Regular water; deciduous in winter Prunus ilicifolia Holly-leaved Cherry Coast Ranges from Napa southward into Mexico & to Santa Catalina & San Clement Islands; on dry slopes & flats of foothills Prunus subcordata Klamath Plum Southern California Sierras, Northern California into Oregon; some moisture; deciduous in Sierra Plum winter Prunus virginiana (probably demissa) Chokecherry Most of the West into S.
    [Show full text]
  • References Cited
    References Cited Ballmer, G. and G.Pratt. 1988. A survey of the last instar larvae of the Lycaenidae of California. J. Res. Lep. 27: 1-81. Claibome, W. 1997. Authorities net butterfly poacher at National Park. Washington Post August 2, 1997. Clark, D.L., Finley, K.K. and Ingersoll, C.A. 1993. Status Report for Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens. Prepared for the Conservation Biology Program, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Salem, OR. 55 pp. Clarke, S.A. 1905. Pioneer Days of Oregon History Vol. I, pp 89-90. J.K. Gill Co., Portland, OR. Collins, N.M. and M.G. Morris. 1985. Threatened Swallowtail butterflies of the world. IUCN Red Data Book. Gland, Switzerland. 401pp. Cronquist, Arthur. 1947. Revision of the North American species of Erigeron, north of Mexico. Brittonia 6: 173-1 74 Dornfeld, E. J. 1980. Butterflies of Oregon. Timber Press, Forest Grove, Oregon. Douglas, D. 1972. The Oregon Journals of David Douglas of His Travels and Adventures Among the Traders and Indians in the Columbia, Willamette, and Snake River Regions During the Years 1825, 1826, and 1827. The Oregon Book Society, Ashland, OR. Downey, J. C. 1962. Myrmecophily in Plebejus (Icaricia) icarioides (Lepid: Lycaenidae). Net. News 73:57-66. Downey, J.C. 1975. Genus Pegasus Klux. Pp. 337-35 1 IN W. H. Howe,ed., The butterflies of North America. Doubleday and Co., Garden City, New York. Duffey, E. 1968. Ecological studies on the large copper butterflies, lycaena dispar batayus, at Woodwalton Fen NNR, Huntingdonshire. J. Appl. Ecol. 5:69-96. Franklin, J.F. and C.T. Dyrness.
    [Show full text]
  • DCDB: an Updated On-Line Database of Chromosome Numbers of Tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae)
    DCDB: an updated on-line database of chromosome numbers of tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae) Maria Bosch1, Joan Simon1, Jordi López-Pujol2 & Cèsar Blanché1 1BioC-GReB, Laboratori de Botànica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona. Av. Joan XXIII s/n. 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia (Spain) 2BioC-GReB, Botanic Institute of Barcelona (IBB-CSIC-ICUB). Passeig del Migdia s/n. 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia (Spain) VERSION 2.0 UPDATED 23/IV/2016 Abstract. A new version of the earlier chromosome database of tribe Delphinieae (Simon, J., M. Bosch, J. Molero & C. Blanché. 1999. A conspect of chromosome numbers in tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae). Biodiversity Electronic Publications, 1 [Available online at http://hdl.handle.net/2445/95875]) is presented, after an accurate extensive literature and Internet survey, by adding the chromosome counts for the genera Aconitum L. (including Gymnaconitum (Stapf) Wei Wang & Z. D. Chen), Delphinium L. (including Staphisagria Spach), Consolida (DC.) S.F. Gray and Aconitella Spach, accumulated in the last 17 years. A total number of 2598 reports are presented, belonging to 389 species, representing a 44.5% of the total species number of the tribe (an increase of c. 137% compared with the 1097 reports gathered in the 1999 version). This increase is due both to chromosome research progress (analysed as counts/year) and an improved information capture system (including checking of populations location through Cyrillic alphabet, and Japanese and Chinese writing systems). Additionally, recent taxonomic advances, synonimization and new phylogenetic criteria have also been taken in account. The main basic number x = 8 is found at 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, 6x, and 8x ploidy levels, whereas x = 9 is much rarer.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests
    A GUIDE TO Priority Plant and Animal Species IN OREGON FORESTS A publication of the Oregon Forest Resources Institute Sponsors of the first animal and plant guidebooks included the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Oregon State University and the Oregon State Implementation Committee, Sustainable Forestry Initiative. This update was made possible with help from the Northwest Habitat Institute, the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University and Oregon State University. Acknowledgments: The Oregon Forest Resources Institute is grateful to the following contributors: Thomas O’Neil, Kathleen O’Neil, Malcolm Anderson and Jamie McFadden, Northwest Habitat Institute; the Integrated Habitat and Biodiversity Information System (IBIS), supported in part by the Northwest Power and Conservation Council and the Bonneville Power Administration under project #2003-072-00 and ESRI Conservation Program grants; Sue Vrilakas, Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, Institute for Natural Resources; and Dana Sanchez, Oregon State University, Mark Gourley, Starker Forests and Mike Rochelle, Weyerhaeuser Company. Edited by: Fran Cafferata Coe, Cafferata Consulting, LLC. Designed by: Sarah Craig, Word Jones © Copyright 2012 A Guide to Priority Plant and Animal Species in Oregon Forests Oregonians care about forest-dwelling wildlife and plants. This revised and updated publication is designed to assist forest landowners, land managers, students and educators in understanding how forests provide habitat for different wildlife and plant species. Keeping forestland in forestry is a great way to mitigate habitat loss resulting from development, mining and other non-forest uses. Through the use of specific forestry techniques, landowners can maintain, enhance and even create habitat for birds, mammals and amphibians while still managing lands for timber production.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagebrush Ecology of Parker Mountain, Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-2016 Sagebrush Ecology of Parker Mountain, Utah Nathan E. Dulfon Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Dulfon, Nathan E., "Sagebrush Ecology of Parker Mountain, Utah" (2016). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 5056. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5056 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SAGEBRUSH ECOLOGY OF PARKER MOUNTAIN, UTAH by Nathan E. Dulfon A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Range Science Approved: _________________ _________________ Eric T. Thacker Terry A. Messmer Major Professor Committee Member __________________ ___________________ Thomas A. Monaco Mark R. McLellan Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2016 ii Copyright © Nathan E. Dulfon 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Sagebrush Ecology of Parker Mountain, Utah by Nathan E. Dulfon, Master of Science Utah State University, 2016 Major Professor: Dr. Eric T. Thacker Department: Wildland Resources Parker Mountain, is located in south central Utah, it consists of 153 780 ha of high elevation rangelands dominated by black sagebrush (Artemisia nova A. Nelson), and mountain big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. subsp. vaseyana [Rybd.] Beetle) communities. Sagebrush obligate species including greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) depend on these vegetation communities throughout the year.
    [Show full text]