Curriculum Vitae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids
SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. -
Specified Protected Matters Impact Profiles (Including Risk Assessment)
Appendix F Specified Protected Matters impact profiles (including risk assessment) Roads and Maritime Services EPBC Act Strategic Assessment – Strategic Assessment Report 1. FA1 - Wetland-dependent fauna Species included (common name, scientific name) Listing SPRAT ID Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) Endangered 1001 Oxleyan Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca oxleyana) Endangered 64468 Blue Mountains Water Skink (Eulamprus leuraensis) Endangered 59199 Yellow-spotted Tree Frog/Yellow-spotted Bell Frog (Litoria castanea) Endangered 1848 Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus australicus) Vulnerable 1973 Booroolong Frog (Litoria booroolongensis) Endangered 1844 Littlejohns Tree Frog (Litoria littlejohni) Vulnerable 64733 1.1 Wetland-dependent fauna description Item Summary Description Found in the waters, riparian vegetation and associated wetland vegetation of a diversity of freshwater wetland habitats. B. poiciloptilus is a large, stocky, thick-necked heron-like bird with camouflage-like plumage growing up to 66-76 cm with a wingspan of 1050-1180 cm and feeds on freshwater crustacean, fish, insects, snakes, leaves and fruit. N. oxleyana is light brown to olive coloured freshwater fish with mottling and three to four patchy, dark brown bars extending from head to tail and a whitish belly growing up to 35-60 mm. This is a mobile species that is often observed individually or in pairs and sometimes in small groups but does not form schools and feed on aquatic insects and their larvae (Allen, 1989; McDowall, 1996). E. leuraensis is an insectivorous, medium-sized lizard growing to approximately 20 cm in length. This species has a relatively dark brown/black body when compared to other Eulamprus spp. Also has narrow yellow/bronze to white stripes along its length to beginning of the tail and continuing along the tail as a series of spots (LeBreton, 1996; Cogger, 2000). -
Ecology of Pyrmont Peninsula 1788 - 2008
Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Sydney, 2010. Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula iii Executive summary City Council’s ‘Sustainable Sydney 2030’ initiative ‘is a vision for the sustainable development of the City for the next 20 years and beyond’. It has a largely anthropocentric basis, that is ‘viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and values’(Macquarie Dictionary, 2005). The perspective taken here is that Council’s initiative, vital though it is, should be underpinned by an ecocentric ethic to succeed. This latter was defined by Aldo Leopold in 1949, 60 years ago, as ‘a philosophy that recognizes[sic] that the ecosphere, rather than any individual organism[notably humans] is the source and support of all life and as such advises a holistic and eco-centric approach to government, industry, and individual’(http://dictionary.babylon.com). Some relevant considerations are set out in Part 1: General Introduction. In this report, Pyrmont peninsula - that is the communities of Pyrmont and Ultimo – is considered as a microcosm of the City of Sydney, indeed of urban areas globally. An extensive series of early views of the peninsula are presented to help the reader better visualise this place as it was early in European settlement (Part 2: Early views of Pyrmont peninsula). The physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula has been transformed since European settlement, and Part 3: Physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula describes the geology, soils, topography, shoreline and drainage as they would most likely have appeared to the first Europeans to set foot there. -
AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements
AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements and David L. Jones Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P-H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name. -
3193VEA Otway Report PDF
ANGAHOOK-OTWAY INVESTIGATION DISCUSSION PAPER VICTORIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 2003 WHAT IS VEAC? The Victorian Environmental Assessment Council was established in 2002 – under the Victorian Environmental Assessment Council Act 2001 – to replace the Environment Conservation Council (ECC) as the body providing the State Government with independent advice on strategic public land-use planning. The five members of VEAC are: (Chair) Dr Brian Robinson,AM, FTSE, B.Sc., Ph.D. – The former chair of the Environment Protection Authority; a wealth of experience in sustainable development and natural resources management. Dr Sarah Ewing, B.Sc (Hons), M.Sc., Ph.D., Grad. Dip. Ed. – Currently a member of the Victorian Catchment Management Council and formerly a deputy member of the Australian Landcare Council; many years experience in catchment and natural resource management issues. Mr Duncan Malcolm – Currently the Chairman of the Gippsland Coastal Board and Watermark Inc.; immediate past Chairman of Lakes and Wilderness Tourism Association, immediate past chair and current board member of Irrigation Association of Australia and member of Victorian Coastal Council. Dr David Mercer, BA (Hons), Ph.D., Dip.Ed. – Fellow of The Environment Institute of Australia and New Zealand; broad expertise in natural resource management, recreation and tourism and also highly regarded academic experience. Mrs Eda Ritchie, Grad. Dip. Bus. – Formerly a member of the Environment Conservation Council,Trust for Nature Board and the Chairperson of the Western Region Coastal Board; has a strong background in farming in Western Victoria. SUBMISSIONS INVITED Submissions are now invited from interested groups and individuals for consideration for the Draft Proposals Paper to be published early in 2004. -
East Gippsland, Victoria
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. -
Checklist of the Orchids of Australia Including Its Island Territories
Checklist of the Orchids of Australia Including its Island Territories Gary N. Backhouse Robert J. Bates Andrew P. Brown Lachlan M. Copeland Second Edition Contents Introduction ........................................................................................ page 1 Australia orchid genera ...................................................................... page 4 Australia species ................................................................................. page 7 Non-native (exotic or weed) species ................................................ page 57 Australia hybrids ............................................................................... page 58 Australian Capital Territory species .................................................. page 69 Australian Capital Territory hybrids .................................................. page 72 New South Wales species ................................................................. page 73 New South Wales hybrids ................................................................. page 86 Northern Territory species ............................................................... page 88 Queensland species .......................................................................... page 89 Queensland hybrids .......................................................................... page 99 South Australia species ................................................................... page 100 South Australia hybrids .................................................................. -
ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ Gülden
ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ Gülden SANDAL DOKTORA TEZİ DOĞU AKDENİZ BÖLGESİ’NDE YETİŞEN ORKİDELER VE YETİŞME ORTAMI NİTELİKLERİ İLE TEHDİT FAKTÖRLERİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI PEYZAJ MİMARLIĞI ANABİLİM DALI ADANA, 2009 ÖZ DOKTORA TEZİ DOĞU AKDENİZ BÖLGESİ’NDE YETİŞEN ORKİDELER VE YETİŞME ORTAMI NİTELİKLERİ İLE TEHDİT FAKTÖRLERİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI Gülden SANDAL ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ PEYZAJ MİMARLIĞI ANABİLİM DALI Danışman : Prof.Dr. Zerrin SÖĞÜT Yıl : 2009, Sayfa: 193 Jüri : Prof.Dr. Zerrin SÖĞÜT : Prof.Dr. İbrahim ORTAŞ : Prof.Dr.K.Tuluhan YILMAZ : DoçDr. Hakan ALPHAN : Yrd.Doç.Dr. Rüya YILMAZ Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesinde 75 doğal orkide taksonu (13 cins) yetişmektedir. Çalışmada Mersinden başlayarak, Kahramanmaraş’a uzanan bölgede (0-1777m) üç yıllık sürede 37 orkide türü saptanmıştır. Kanonik Uyum Analizi sonucunda orkide türlerinin dağılımında en etkili çevresel etkenin yükseklik olduğu belirlenmiştir. Mediterran-montan iklim kuşağına özgü tür belirlenememiş, ancak sadece Submediterran (5 tür) ve Mediterran (9 tür) kuşaklarda yetişen türler belirlenmiştir. Analizlere göre orkideler topraklarda bulunan N, P2O5, K2O, Karbon, Organik madde ve kum oranı ile ışık isteği yönünden seçici olabilmektedir. Üç yıl içinde sırasıyla en fazla yerleşim, insan etkisi, piknik yapma, tarımsal aktiviteler, otlatma, ulaşım aktivitelerinden olumsuz yönde etkilenme olmuş; bazı parseller (% 20.5) yok olmuştur. Koruma alanları, mezarlık ve ormanlar korumada en etkin kullanımlardır. Yaygınlık ve parsellerdeki sıklıkları değerlendirildiğinde -
Advances in Plant Conservation Biology
Advances in plant conservation biology: Implications for flora management and restoration Symposium program and abstracts Perth, Western Australia 25-27 October 2005 AdvancesAdvances inin plantplant conservationconservation biologybiology Symposium, Perth The symposium logo The logo is a stylised image of Calothamnus graniticus subsp. leptophyllus designed by the Department of Conservation and Land Management’s Senior Graphic Designer, Gooitzen van der Meer. The genus Calothamnus, from the family Myrtaceae, is endemic to Western Australia and is commonly found throughout the south-west. The name AdvancesAdvances inin plantplant Calothamnus means “beautiful bush” but the genus is commonly known as conservationconservation biologybiology Symposium, Perth claw flowers due to the striking red claw-shaped flowers. There are 46 taxa in the genus, of which 15 are listed as threatened, rare or poorly known. Calothamnus graniticus subsp. leptophyllus is one of the taxa in the genus that is listed as rare and in need of further survey. It is known from just a few populations south of Perth and in the Stirling Ranges. Advances in plant conservation biology: Implications for flora management and restoration Organising commitee David Coates – Department of Conservation and Land Management (WA) Andrew Crawford – Department of Conservation and Land Management (WA) Kingsley Dixon – Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority (WA) Shelley McArthur – Department of Conservation and Land Management (WA) Leonie Monks – Department of Conservation and Land Management (WA) Deanna Rokich – Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority (WA) Joanne Smith – Department of Conservation and Land Management (WA) 1 Advances in plant conservation biology: Implications for flora management and restoration Program Tuesday 25 October 2005 8.00 am Symposium registration -Technology Park Function Centre 9.00 am Welcome and launch by CALM Executive Director, Kieran McNamara Rarity Chair: David Coates (CALM) 9.30 am Peggy Fiedler (BBL Sciences, California), Brenda J. -
Part 10 ESP Intro
16 Cunninghamia 9(1): 2005 Benson & McDougall, Ecology of Sydney plant species 10 M a c q u Rylstone a r i e Coricudgy R i v e r e g n CC a Orange R Wyong g n i Gosford Bathurst d i Lithgow v Mt Tomah i Blayney D R. y r Windsor C t u a o b Oberon s e x r e s G k Penrith w a R Parramatta CT H i ve – Sydney r n a Abe e Liverpool rcro p m e b Botany Bay ie N R Camden iv Picton er er iv R y l l i Wollongong d n o l l o W N Berry NSW Nowra 050 Sydney kilometres Map of the Sydney region For the Ecology of Sydney Plant Species the Sydney region is defined as the Central Coast and Central Tablelands botanical subdivisions. Cunninghamia 9(1): 2005 Benson & McDougall, Ecology of Sydney plant species 10 17 Ecology of Sydney plant species Part 10 Monocotyledon families Lemnaceae to Zosteraceae Doug Benson and Lyn McDougall Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, AUSTRALIA 2000. Email: [email protected] Abstract: Ecological data in tabular form are provided on 668 plant species of the families Lemnaceae to Zosteraceae, 505 native and 163 exotics, occurring in the Sydney region, defined by the Central Coast and Central Tablelands botanical subdivisions of New South Wales (approximately bounded by Lake Macquarie, Orange, Crookwell and Nowra). Relevant Local Government Areas are Auburn, Ashfield, Bankstown, Bathurst, Baulkham Hills, Blacktown, Blayney, Blue Mountains, Botany, Burwood, Cabonne, Camden, Campbelltown, Canada Bay, Canterbury, Cessnock, Crookwell, Evans, Fairfield, Greater Lithgow, Gosford, Hawkesbury, Holroyd, Hornsby, Hunters Hill, Hurstville, Kiama, Kogarah, Ku-ring-gai, Lake Macquarie, Lane Cove, Leichhardt, Liverpool, Manly, Marrickville, Mosman, Mulwaree, North Sydney, Oberon, Orange, Parramatta, Penrith, Pittwater, Randwick, Rockdale, Ryde, Rylstone, Shellharbour, Shoalhaven, Singleton, South Sydney, Strathfield, Sutherland, Sydney City, Warringah, Waverley, Willoughby, Wingecarribee, Wollondilly, Wollongong, Woollahra and Wyong. -
Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 23 21-Jan-11 Reading the Biodiversity Summary the Summary Is Divided Into Two Sections: Highlightsand Species List
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.