DOCSLIB.ORG

East Gippsland, Victoria

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. The summary summarises the input data, so errors found in the original data would also be reflected in this summary. • The scientific names and taxonomic concepts used in this report reflect an ANHAT view of the data and not necessarily that found in government censuses, databases or other authoritative lists. Biodiversity summary for East Gippsland VIC Page 1 of 38 21-Jan-11 Reading the Biodiversity Summary The summary is divided into two sections: Highlightsand Species List. Highlights section This section draws attention to species of special interest, or characteristics of the biodiversity in the region which rate very highly compared to the rest of Australia. It contains the following: • Total number of nationally rare and threatened species found in the region and listed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. • A list of families which have a very high level of species richness or endemism compared to the rest of Australia. - Species richness counts the number of different species found in a given area. - Endemism estimates the degree to which species found in a given area have small geographic ranges. The smaller the range of a species, the more it contributes to the endemism score. In this summary, a threshold value of 2% was used. This means that compared to the rest of the country, the families listed in the summary may have a significant focus of diversity here, because all or part of the region has richness or endemism scores within the top 2% of areas in Australia. • A count of the number of species which have more than 50% of their recorded range within the region. If a species shows a value of 100% it indicates its distribution is restricted to that particular region as all the available records are in that region. Biodiversity summary for East Gippsland VIC Page 2 of 38 21-Jan-11 Species List section This section shows species which may be significant for biodiversity management in the region because: • they are listed in the EPBC Act as critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable, or conservation dependent; • their distribution lies entirely or primarily within the region. For each plant or animal family listed, this section also gives the total number of species in the country, and how many of them are found in the region. Note that this list covers species in the families listed in Appendix 1. Many species found in the region will not be listed because they don’t meet either of the two criteria above. The aim of providing a selected species list is to narrow the view from a very large number of species, to those which may be a focus of conservation activity in the region. Species which are largely restricted to the region may not have any conservation concerns, but may deserve attention because their future lies with the region and those who manage it. A list of all species in the region belonging to the families listed in Appendix 1 is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Biodiversity summary for East Gippsland VIC Page 3 of 38 21-Jan-11 Biodiversity Summary for NRM Region East Gippsland, Victoria This summary was produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities using the Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool (ANHAT). ANHAT is a database and decision support tool which uses over 33 million specimen and survey records for vertebrates, selected invertebrates and 137 vascular plant families (over 15,000 species). This Biodiversity Summary does not include exotic or extinct species. Highlights Species Restricted to this Region The proportion of sampled range (%) as shown in the Species List is an indication of the distribution of the species in the region in relation to other parts of Australia. There are 89 species with greater than 50% of their recorded range in the region. Of these species, 37 species have 100% of their recorded range in the region. See the Species List for details. Threatened species (Enviroment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act) Total number of threatened species (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act) in this region which belong to the families covered by this Biodiversity Summary (Appendix 1) 23 species declared as endangered 44 species declared as vulnerable 1 species declared as conservation dependent Species Richness Compared to the rest of Australia parts of this region show a high level of richness for the following families. This means that the number of species in these families is in the top 2% compared to the rest of the country. Vertebrate fauna - Family Acanthizidae - Scrubwrens, Thornbills and Allies - Family Carangidae - Amberjacks, Jacks, Pilotfishes, Pompanos, Queenfish - Family Cepolidae - Bandfishes - Family Corvidae - Crows and Jays - Family Elopidae - Ladyfish - Family Enoplosidae - Oldwife - Family Galaxiidae - Galaxias, Salamanderfish Biodiversity summary for East Gippsland VIC Page 4 of 38 21-Jan-11 - Family Gobiidae - Gobies - Family Gonorynchidae - Beaked Salmon, Beaked Sandfish, Ratfish - Family Kyphosidae - Drummers, Halfmoons, Knifefishes, Microcanthids, Nib - Family Labridae - Wrasses, Parrotfishes, Rockwhitings - Family Monacanthidae - Leatherjackets - Family Mugilidae - Mullets - Family Ostraciidae - Boxfishes, Coffer Fishes, Cowfishes, Trunkfishes, Turr - Family Otariidae - Eared Seals - Family Petroicidae - Australasian Robins - Family Petromyzontidae - Lampreys - Family Phalangeridae - Brushtail Possums, Cuscuses and Scaly-tailed Pos - Family Phocidae - True Seals - Family Pleuronectidae - Right Handed Flatfishes, Righteye Flounders - Family Pomatomidae - Bluefish, Tailor - Family Retropinnidae - Southern Graylings, Southern Smelts - Family Sillaginidae - Sillagos, Whitings - Family Soleidae - Soles - Family Sparidae - Breams, Porgies, Seabreams - Family Tetraodontidae - Blowfishes, Pufferfishes, Puffers, Toadfishes, Toby - Family Tetrarogidae - Fortesques, Sailback Scorpionfishes, Waspfish Invertebrate fauna - Family Ancylidae - Freshwater Limpets - Family Austropetaliidae - Redspot Dragonflies - Family Carabidae - Ground Beetles - Family Cixiidae - - Family Colletidae - Short-tongued Bees - Family Cystopeltidae - Australian "Half" Slugs - Family Dipluridae - Funnel-web-like Spiders - Family Halictidae - - Family Hexathelidae - Funnel-web Spiders - Family Kalotermitidae - Termite - Family Lestidae - Ringtail, Reedling and Dusky Spreadwing Damselflies - Family Lycosidae - Wolf Spiders - Family Migidae - Brushless-legged Trapdoor Spiders - Family Oxycarenidae - - Family Punctidae - Translucent Frosted Land Snails - Family Synthemistidae - Spottail and Tigertail Dragonflies - Family Telephlebiidae - Darner Dragonflies - Family Tettigarctidae - - Family Therevidae - Stiletto Flies - Family Veliidae - Small Water Striders, Riffle Bugs Vascular flora - Family Asphodelaceae - Native Leek - Family Asteliaceae - Palm-Lilies and Allies - Family Asteraceae - Daisies and Allies - Family Caryophyllaceae - Pin Cushion, Wort - Family Casuarinaceae - She-oaks - Family Cyperaceae - Sedges - Family Ericaceae - Heathers and Rhododendrons - Family Hemerocallidaceae - Biodiversity summary for East Gippsland VIC Page 5 of 38 21-Jan-11 - Family Iridaceae - Irises and Allies - Family Juncaceae - Rushes - Family Onagraceae - Water Primrose and Willowherbs - Family Orchidaceae - Orchids - Family Poaceae - Grasses - Family Ruppiaceae - - Family Rutaceae - Boronia, Correa, Citrus, Phebalium, Philotheca, Zieria an - Family Scrophulariaceae - Figworts - Family Thismiaceae - Fairy Lanterns - Family Winteraceae - Pepper Trees Biodiversity summary for East Gippsland VIC Page 6 of 38 21-Jan-11 Endemism
Recommended publications
  • Curriculum Vitae

    Curriculum Vitae

    CURRICULUM VITAE Name Colin Charles Bower Age 61 years Date of birth 29 August 1948 Postal Address PO Box 300, Orange, NSW 2800 Home / Office Address 37 Kent Avenue, Orange, NSW 2800 Phone Home: 02 6363 1513 Work: 02 6369 0252 Fax: 02 6369 0252 Mobile: 0428 263 274 E-mail [email protected] Current employment Consultant Botanist / Entomologist FloraSearch, PO Box 300, Orange, NSW 2800 Qualifications B.Sc. (Hons) (Zoology), University of Sydney (1969) Ph.D. (Zoology), University of Sydney (1975) Professional history 1975-1992 Employed as a research entomologist by NSW Agriculture at: 1975 Biological and Chemical Research Institute, Rydalmere 1975-1980 Agricultural Research Station, Bathurst 1980-1992 Agricultural Research and Veterinary Centre, Orange 1992- Apr. 2003 Program Leader, Horticulture, NSW Agriculture, Head Office, Orange Apr. 2003 - present Full time consultant (economic entomology, flora and fauna surveys, pollination biology, scientific reviews) Research history: Undergraduate 1969 Honours thesis on the anatomy and physiology of colour patterns in the mouth breeding cichlid, Tilapia mossambica. Postgraduate 1970-1974 Ph.D. thesis on the behaviour and ecology of the larvae of the Queensland fruitfly, Dacus tryoni Froggatt. Current society memberships: • Ecological Consultants Association of New South Wales • Associate of the Australian National Herbarium Canberra • Australian Entomological Society • Entomological Society of New South Wales • Friends of the Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney • Australasian Native Orchid Society • Orange Field Naturalist and Conservation Society Professional Committee: 1998-present Member of Research Committee of the Australian Orchid Foundation. Licences: • Scientific Licence No. S11329, NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Insurances: • Public Liability - $20m • Professional Indemnity - $10m Economic entomology research – Projects led 1975-1978 Ecology and control of apple root weevil, Perperus sp.
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory

    Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • East Gippsland, Victoria

    East Gippsland, Victoria

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project

    Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project

    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
  • Genetic Diversity and Adaptation in Eucalyptus Pauciflora

    Genetic Diversity and Adaptation in Eucalyptus Pauciflora

    Genetic diversity and adaptation in Eucalyptus pauciflora Archana Gauli (M.Sc.) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania June, 2014 Declarations This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Archana Gauli Date Authority of access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Archana Gauli Date Statement regarding published work contained in thesis The publishers of the paper comprising Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 hold the copyright for that content, and access to the material should be sought from the respective journals. The remaining non-published content of the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Archana Gauli Date i Statement of publication Chapter 2 has been published as: Gauli A, Vaillancourt RE, Steane DA, Bailey TG, Potts BM (2014) The effect of forest fragmentation and altitude on the mating system of Eucalyptus pauciflora (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 61, 622-632. Chapter 3 has been accepted for publication as: Gauli A, Steane DA, Vaillancourt RE, Potts BM (in press) Molecular genetic diversity and population structure in Eucalyptus pauciflora subsp.
  • Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 Protected Flora List November 2019

    Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 Protected Flora List November 2019

    Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 Protected Flora List November 2019 What is Protected Flora? Protected flora are native plants or communities of native plants that have legal protection under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988. The Protected Flora List includes plants from three sources: plant taxa (species, subspecies or varieties) listed as threatened under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 plant taxa belonging to communities listed as threatened under the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 plant taxa which are not threatened but require protection for other reasons. For example, some species which are attractive or highly sought after, such as orchids and grass trees, are protected so that the removal of these species from the wild can be controlled. For all listed species protection includes living (eg flowers, seeds, shoots and roots) and non-living (eg bark, leaves and other litter) plant material. Do I need a permit or licence? The handling of protected flora is regulated by the Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning (DELWP) to ensure that any harvesting or loss is ecologically sustainable. You must obtain a ‘Protected Flora Licence’ or Permit from one of the Regional Offices of DELWP if you want to collect protected native plants or if you are planning to do works or other activities on public land which might kill, injure or disturb protected native plants. In most cases, you do not require a Licence or Permit for works or activities on private land, although you may require a planning permit from your local council.
  • Platanthera Chapmanii: Culture, Population Augmentation, and Mycorrhizal Associations

    Platanthera Chapmanii: Culture, Population Augmentation, and Mycorrhizal Associations

    Platanthera chapmanii: culture, population augmentation, and mycorrhizal associations By Kirsten Poff, B.S. A Thesis In Plant and Soil Science Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved Dr. Jyotsna Sharma Chair of Committee Dr. Scott Longing Dr. John Zak Dr. Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2016 © 2016, Kirsten Poff Texas Tech University, Kirsten Poff, August 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First I would like to thank my mentor and advisor, Dr. Jyotsna Sharma for all of her help and support. She has challenged and encouraged me throughout my program and the duration of this project. Thanks to her, I am light-years ahead of where I was two years ago. Texas Parks and Wildlife is also gratefully acknowledged for funding portions of this study. I also wish to express my gratitude to Dr. John Zak for his enthusiasm and for encouraging my love of microbes. I also gratefully thank Dr. Scott Longing for his advice, and constructive comments. I sincerely thank all three committee members for all the time and energy they have spent on me throughout the duration of my project. I gratefully acknowledge Dr. Jason Woodward for his encouragement and recommendations as well. I also acknowledge Dr. Cynthia McKenney and Mr. Russel Plowman for their support; I now have a passion for teaching, and a much better understanding of what it is like to teach college level courses. I want to also thank Mr. Robby Carlson for his time and technological assistance.
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids

    Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids

    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
  • Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven

    Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven

    Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Namadgi, ACT Bush Blitz Spiders 27 November-5 December 2018 Submitted: August 2019 Robert Raven Nomenclature and taxonomy used in this report is consistent with: The Australian Faunal Directory (AFD) http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/abrs/online-resources/fauna/afd/home Page 1 of 12 Bush Blitz – Namadgi, ACT 27 Nov-5 Dec 2018 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 2 List of contributors ................................................................................................................... 2 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methods .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Survey techniques ..................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Methods used at standard survey sites ................................................................... 5 2.3 Identifying the collections .........................................................................................
  • Raven, RJ 1984. a Revision of the Aname Maculata Species Group

    Raven, RJ 1984. a Revision of the Aname Maculata Species Group

    Raven,R. J. 1984.A revision of the Anamemaculata species group(Araneae, Dipluridae) with notes on biogeography.J. ArachnoL,12:177-193. A REVISION OF THE ANAME MA CULA TA SPECIES GROUP (DIPLURIDAE, ARANEAE) WITH NOTES ON BIOGEOGRAPHY Robert1 J. Raven Queensland Museum Gregory Terrace, Fortitude Valley, Queensland ABSTRACT Thespecies of the Anamem¢culata (Hogg) species-group (previously Chenistonia) are revised. The type species, Chenistonlamaculara Hogg, and C trevallynia Hickmanare diagnosed.Five new species: A. caeruleomontana,A. earrhwatchorum,A. hiekmani,A. montanaand A. tropica, are described. Asmost of these species possess a serrula, absent in manyother species of Aname,the groupis of phylo~eneticsignificance. Becausethe groupoccurs in discontinuousmontane talnforests fromnorthern Queensland to Tasmania,it is also of biogeographicinterest. INTRODUCTION The Anamemaculata species group includes someof those species previously included in Chenistonia which Raven (1981) considered monophyletic. Although the species have revised lack a synapomorphythey remain a coherent taxonomicunit. Males of all species have a moderately short embolus on the palp and the first metatarsus is not usually as incrassate as that of the A. pallida species group. Twopreviously described species, Anamemaculata (Hogg) and Anametrevallynia (Hickman), are included in the group present. The male of "Chenistonia tepperi’ Hogg[presumably that described by Rainbow and PuUeine(1918) as Chenistonia major Hoggand placed by Main (1972) in Stanwellia] is being revised by Mainas part of the very complex’Chenistonia tepperi’ species group. MATERIALS AND METHODS All drawings were made with a camera-lucida. Spermathecae were drawn after being cleared in lactic acid. All measurementsare in millimetres except eye measurements which are in ocular micrometerunits.
  • Genetic Comparison Between Victorian and Tasmanian Populations of Prasophyllum Correctum D.L

    Genetic Comparison Between Victorian and Tasmanian Populations of Prasophyllum Correctum D.L

    Muelleria 18: 79–87 (2003) Genetic comparison between Victorian and Tasmanian populations of Prasophyllum correctum D.L. Jones (Orchidaceae) suggests separate species L. A. Orthia1, R. C. Garrick1 and E. A. James1,2 1Genetics Department, La Trobe University, VIC. 3086. 2National Herbarium of Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, Private Bag 2000, VIC. 3141. Abstract Genetic variation within and between Tasmanian and Victorian populations of the Gaping Leek Orchid Prasophyllum correctum (Orchidaceae) was investigated using the Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) method. The degree of fixed genetic differences between the two populations was substantial, suggesting that each population constitutes a different species. The Tasmanian population contained very little genetic variation, indicating that asexual reproduction or self-fertilisation may be the predominant reproductive mode, but this population does not appear to be clonal. Individuals from the Victorian population exhibited high levels of genetic variation relative to those from the Tasmanian population. These findings suggest that the Victorian and Tasmanian P. correctum populations ought to be managed separately, and cross-pollination or translocation should be avoided, because of the lack of genetic similarity between them. Keywords: Prasophyllum, RAPD, genetic variability, conservation Introduction The Gaping Leek Orchid, Prasophyllum correctum D.L. Jones, is a small terrestrial orchid from southeastern Australia. Prasophyllum correctum (Jones 1994) was believed to be endemic to Victoria until plants collected in 1995 from the Campbell Town golf course in Tasmania were identified as P. correctum (Jones 1998). The species is believed to have formerly been widespread throughout lowland Gippsland, but it is currently restricted to two small populations located near Munro and Lindenow South in protected rail reserves (Hoey & Lunt 1995) in Themeda triandra Forssk.
  • Chemistry and Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Melaleuca L

    Chemistry and Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Melaleuca L

    REVIEW ARTICLE 11 Chemistry and Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Melaleuca L. Species Luiz Claudio Almeida BARBOSA 1, 2 ( ) Cleber José SILVA 3 Róbson Ricardo TEIXEIRA 1 Renata Maria Strozi Alves MEIRA 4 Antônio Lelis PINHEIRO 5 Summary Essential oils from species Melaleuca genus, especially M. alternifolia (Maiden & Betche) Cheel, have been widely used worldwide in various industries. Th is review is a contribution to Melaleuca knowledge and describes fi ve important essential oil-producing species and two subspecies of Melaleuca in terms of their essential oil chemical composition, medicinal applications, and leaf morphoanatomy. Some relationships between essential oil composition of these species and important biological activities are presented. Useful parameters for the certifi cation of the essential oils are also highlighted. Key words Melaleuca, Myrtaceae, volatile oils, biological activities, leaf morphoanatomy 1 Federal University of Viçosa, Chemistry Department, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] 2 Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Department of Chemistry, (ICEx), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Campus Pampulha, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil 3 Federal University of São João Del-Rei, Campus de Sete Lagoas, 35701-970, Sete Lagoas-MG, Brazil 4 Federal University of Viçosa, Plant Biology Department, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil 5 Federal University of Viçosa, Forest Engineering Department, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil Received: October 27, 2011 | Accepted: December 18, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the Brazilian Agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Supe- rior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) for their financial support.