Specified Protected Matters Impact Profiles (Including Risk Assessment)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Specified Protected Matters Impact Profiles (Including Risk Assessment) Appendix F Specified Protected Matters impact profiles (including risk assessment) Roads and Maritime Services EPBC Act Strategic Assessment – Strategic Assessment Report 1. FA1 - Wetland-dependent fauna Species included (common name, scientific name) Listing SPRAT ID Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) Endangered 1001 Oxleyan Pygmy Perch (Nannoperca oxleyana) Endangered 64468 Blue Mountains Water Skink (Eulamprus leuraensis) Endangered 59199 Yellow-spotted Tree Frog/Yellow-spotted Bell Frog (Litoria castanea) Endangered 1848 Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus australicus) Vulnerable 1973 Booroolong Frog (Litoria booroolongensis) Endangered 1844 Littlejohns Tree Frog (Litoria littlejohni) Vulnerable 64733 1.1 Wetland-dependent fauna description Item Summary Description Found in the waters, riparian vegetation and associated wetland vegetation of a diversity of freshwater wetland habitats. B. poiciloptilus is a large, stocky, thick-necked heron-like bird with camouflage-like plumage growing up to 66-76 cm with a wingspan of 1050-1180 cm and feeds on freshwater crustacean, fish, insects, snakes, leaves and fruit. N. oxleyana is light brown to olive coloured freshwater fish with mottling and three to four patchy, dark brown bars extending from head to tail and a whitish belly growing up to 35-60 mm. This is a mobile species that is often observed individually or in pairs and sometimes in small groups but does not form schools and feed on aquatic insects and their larvae (Allen, 1989; McDowall, 1996). E. leuraensis is an insectivorous, medium-sized lizard growing to approximately 20 cm in length. This species has a relatively dark brown/black body when compared to other Eulamprus spp. Also has narrow yellow/bronze to white stripes along its length to beginning of the tail and continuing along the tail as a series of spots (LeBreton, 1996; Cogger, 2000). L. castanea is a frog species with large yellow or cream spots in the groin area and pale yellow spots/marbling on the lower hind limbs growing to 80 mm (Cogger, 2000). H. australiacus is a rotund frog with muscular forearms and hindlimbs ranging in colour from steely blue-grey to dark chocolate brown. This species grows to approximately 95 mm with varying degrees of white/yellowish spots on the sides and white below (Cogger, 2000). This frog mostly consumes ground dwelling invertebrates with the occasional aerial invertebrate (Webb, 1987; Penman, et al., 2005). L. booroolongensis is a medium-sized tree frog growing up to 55 mm. Body colour may be dull grey, olive or reddish brown and may be uniform or consist of indistinct black markings and salmon-coloured flecks. The abdomen is white (Moore, 1961; Barker, et al., 1995). This species is a generalist benthic grazer of arthropods and probably algae and other organic detritus (Hunter, 2013). L. littlejohni has a broad head, is greyish-brown above with many darker spots and flecks and a cream to pink belly and can grow up to 60 mm (Cogger, 2000). Tadpoles have been observed feeding on vegetation, sediment and surface matter while adults presumably eat invertebrates (Hero, et al., 2002). Distribution and habitat B. poiciloptilus occurs from south-east Queensland to south-east South Australia, Tasmania and the south- west of Western Australia. In New South Wales (NSW), it is frequently recorded in the Murray-Darling Basin (Marchant & Higgins, 1990). This is a solitary bird but occasionally found in pairs or dispersed aggregates of up to 12 individuals occurring in permanent and seasonal freshwater wetlands and rarely in estuarine habitats. It favours freshwater wetlands with tall, dense vegetation, where it forages in still and shallow water up to 30 cm deep (Marchant & Higgins, 1990). N. oxleyana has restricted and patchy distribution in approximately 20 coastal localities in Queensland and 25-30 localities in northern NSW (Arthington & Hughes, 1996). Characteristically found in coastal wallum heathlands but have also been recorded in intermediate Eucalypt forest/heath communities, rainforest/Melaleuca swamps and amongst estuarine salt rushes (Harrison & Howland, 1998; NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI), 2005). E. leuraensis is restricted to the areas of the Blue Mountains and Newnes Plateau in NSW (Swan, 1990) where it lives in high elevation habitats from 560 m and restricted to isolated naturally fragmented habitats of permanent sedge and shrub hanging swamps (Wells & Wellington, 1984). L. castanea has relatively restricted distribution centred around Guyra on the New England Tableland in Roads and Maritime Services Appendix F – Specified Protected Matters impact profiles (including risk assessment) FA1 1 Item Summary NSW at altitudes between 1000-1500 m (White & Ehmann, 1997). Primarily occupies permanent ponds, swamps, lagoons, farm dams and the still backwaters of rivers usually where tall reeds are present. Also found in ponds or slow moving streams with overhanging grassy banks and overwintering in hollow centres of rotting logs and in earth surrounding the roots of uprooted trees (Courtice & Grigg, 1975; White & Ehmann, 1997). H. australiacus is confined to the eastern slopes of the Great Dividing Range and coastal regions from near Mouth Coridudgy and Kings Cross in Wollemi National Park (Penman, et al., 2005). Appears to be dependent on areas of native vegetation with strong aversion to cleared habitats with most breeding records occurring in dry sclerophyll forests and wet habitats (Gillespie, 1990; Penman, et al., 2004). L. booroolongensis is known to occur in 28 populations throughout the Murray, Murrumbidgee, Lachlan, Central West, Namoi, Hunter and Manning catchment areas (Hunter, 2013). This species occurs along permanent streams with some fringing vegetation cover such as ferns, sedges or grasses (Robinson, 1993; Anstis, 2002). Requires extensive rock bank structures along water courses (Gillespie, 1999; Hunter & Smith, 2006). L. littlejohni is confined to eastern New South Wales and north-east Victoria with a large distribution but few records throughout (Hero, et al., 2002). Known to inhabit forest, coastal woodland and heath from 100 to 950 m above sea level (asl) (White & Ehmann, 1997). Breeding habitat requirements vary from rocky streams, semi-permanent dams, still water in dams, ditches, isolated pools, flooded hollows, dam creeks and lagoons (Hero, et al., 1991; Barker, et al., 1995). Life history B. poiciloptilus breeds in single solitary pairs generally from October to February but is likely to breed when the plains are inundated by floodwaters. Nests are flat constructs of pieces of reeds measuring about 35-40 cm in diameter and 20-22 cm thick typically in stands of Phragmites sp., Typha sp. or rushes up to 2.5 m tall (Marchant & Higgins, 1990). B. poiciloptus is considered sedentary in permanent habitats but may potentially exercise short migrations during winter or wetter years (Department of the Environment (DoE), 2012). N. oxleyana usually spawn between September/October to December or through to April/May depending on geographic locations. Eggs of the N. oxleyana are adhesive and demersal, sinking and sticking to aquatic vegetation or substrates but little else is known about the reproductive biology of this species (Arthington & Hughes, 1996). N. oxleyana have been known to rely on floods to intermittently connect waterbodies for overland dispersal (Knight, 2000). Breeding season for E. leuraensis is likely to be between September and October with young born in December (LeBreton, 1996). This species is ovoviviparous but no specific information on the habitat requirements during breeding season is available (Department of the Environment (DoE), 2012). E. leuraensis may be active during the warmer months but hibernate during the winter months (LeBreton, 1996). Little is known about the life cycle of L. castanea but has been suggested to be similar to L. aurea and L. raniformis (Department of the Environment (DoE), 2012). Mating calls of H. australiacus are commonly heard in late summer or autumn following heavy rains (Penman, et al., 2004). Mating occurs in ephemeral pools, slow or standing water with foamy egg deposits in standing or flowing water concealed in vegetation or in burrows some distance from foraging areas (Watson & Martin, 1973; Mahony, 1993; Penman, et al., 2004). H. australiacus spend significant period of time underground during unfavourable conditions and during the day but can move 200-300 m a night during period of rain and on nights with low wind and high humidity (Penman, et al., 2006; Department of the Environment (DoE), 2012). Mating calls of L. booroolongensis occur in August preceding breeding in spring and early summer. Eggs are laid in large numbers in submerged rock crevices (Anstis, 2002). L. booroolongensis is a relatively sedentary frog with maximum movements of up to 300 m (Department of the Environment (DoE), 2012). Calling activity of the L. littlejohni has been reported to occur at any time of the year except mid-winter (White, et al., 1994). Clusters of eggs are attached to submerged twigs, stems or branches often near the banks of still pools in clear, slowly flowing streams (Anstis, 2002). Key threats Habitat loss, degradation due to drainage, infill, vegetation clearing, urban development. Cattle grazing. Water quality changes and sedimentation (particular to N. oxleyana which prefer a pH range of 5.9-7.2). Headwater erosion. Barriers to fish passage preventing dispersal. Introduced species including Eastern
Recommended publications
  • Resource Partitioning Among Five Sympatric Mammalian Herbivores on Yanakie Isthmus, South- Eastern Australia
    Resource partitioning among five sympatric mammalian herbivores on Yanakie Isthmus, south- eastern Australia Naomi Ezra Davis Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2010 Department of Zoology The University of Melbourne i Abstract This thesis combines multiple approaches to improve our understanding of large herbivore ecology and organisation in a contemporary assemblage made up of species with independent evolutionary histories on Yanakie Isthmus, Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia. In particular, this thesis compares niche parameters among populations of five sympatric native and introduced herbivore species by simultaneously assessing overlap in resource use along two dimensions (spatial and trophic) at multiple scales, thereby providing insight into resource partitioning and competition within this herbivore assemblage. Faecal pellet counts demonstrated that inter-specific overlap in herbivore habitat use on Yanakie Isthmus was low, suggesting that spatial partitioning of habitat resources had occured. However, resource partitioning appeared to be independent of coevolutionary history. Low overlap in habitat use implies low competition, and the lack of clear shifts in habitat use from preferred to suboptimal habitats suggested that inter-specific competition was not strong enough to cause competitive exclusion. However, low overlap in habitat use between the European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus and other species, and preferential use by rabbits (and avoidance by other species) of the habitat that appeared to have the highest carrying capacity, suggested that rabbits excluded other grazing herbivores from preferred habitat. High overlap in habitat use was apparent between some species, particularly grazers, indicating some potential for competition if resources are limiting.
    [Show full text]
  • Epacris Study Group
    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SOCIETY (Australia) Jnc. EPACRIS STUDY GROUP Group Leader: Gwen Elliot, P.O.Box 655 Heathmont Vic. 3135 NEWSLETTER NO. 30 (ISSN 1038-6017) Greetings to all Epacris Study Group members, Regular readers of our Newsletters will have noticed the following note which was added to page 1 of our Autumn 2010 issue, just prior to it going to press. NOTE: I have just received in the post an envelope addressed to the Epacris Study Group, posted from Hobart on May Znd, 2010. Unfortunately the envelope was slit along the bottom and was totally empty. There was no information regarding the sender, but ifyou have sent such a letter in recent days, please let me know, and perhaps cancel any cheque sent. Fortunately all turned out well in the end, as the next morning an Epacris Study Group renewal form was delivered with a $5 note stapled to the corner. Our very nice Post Office manager advised that it had been found on the floor of the district sorting office. He went on to explain that many of today's envelopes have a very effective self-sealing strip and if there is any air left in the envelope when the seal is fastened envelopes can 'pop' at the bottom as they go through the rollers of the sorting machines. This is certainly something I had not personally considered previously, but I felt it is very useful information for us all to be aware of. All of my letters will be squashed down firmly in future to avoid this potential problem.
    [Show full text]
  • NSW Weeds Conference Program
    16th NSW Weeds Conference Proceedings 18th - 21st of July, 2011 Pacific Bay Conference Centre, Coffs Harbour Proudly hosted by Thank you to our Gold Sponsors Silver Sponsor Bronze Sponsors Introduction: The NSW Weeds Conference held in Coffs harbour 18-22 June 2011, is the 16th in a series organised by NSW Department of Primary Industries in partnership with various other organisations. The 2011 Conference was organised in partnership with Coffs Harbour City Council, NSW North Coast Weeds Advisory Committee, The Weed Society of NSW Inc. and NSW Weed Officers Association. Organising Committee: Rod Ensbey, NSW Department of Primary Industries Birgitte Verbeek, NSW Department of Primary Industries Tony Cook, NSW Department of Primary Industries Warwick Felton, Weeds Society of New South Wales Inc. Tim Scanlon, National Parks & Wildlife Service Reece Luxton, Clarence Valley Council David Merrikin, Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority Ian Turnbull, Bellingen Shire Council Barry Powells, Coffs Harbour City Council Conference organiser: Michelle Aubert, Coffs Harbour City Council Citation: Proceedings of 16th NSW Weeds Conference, Coffs Harbour, July 2011 Disclaimer: The contents of these proceedings have undergone limited editorial or peer review. Papers have been critiqued (reviewers) for incorrect information, excessively controversial content and politically sensitive or libellous information prior to their publication. Paper Reviewers: Rod Ensbey Birgitte Verbeek Elissa van Oosterhout Phillip Blackmore Alan Maguire Peter Gray Tony Cook ISBN 978 1 74256 211 7 Monday 18th of July Registration from 4.30pm – Foyer Pacific Bay Conference Centre. Welcome Reception 5.30pm – 7.00pm Amongst the trade display, Pacific Bay Conference Centre. Day 1 – Tuesday 19th of July Opening Session - Auditorium Chair Bruce Christie, Principal Director Biosecurity NSW DPI 8.30 Welcome to Country 8.35 Conference Welcome – Mayor Keith Rhoades, Coffs Harbour City Council, President of the Local Government Association 8.45 Conference Opening - Minister for Primary Industries, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • ISC Full Document FINAL DRAFT 070204 1700
    Dr Ian Mansergh, Dr Alan Newsome and Dr David Shorthouse Summary This report was commissioned by New South Wales (NSW) National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) as part of the brief to the Independent Scientific Committee (ISC) to examine the scientific significance and condition of attributes of the Kosciuszko National Park. The park’s diverse habitats support populations of about 300 native terrestrial (non-aquatic) vertebrate species - mostly Australian endemics - and an unknown number of invertebrate species. The Kosciuszko faunal assemblage is of national significance, and it makes a major contribution to an internationally significant environmental region that includes the adjacent Alpine National Park in Victoria and Namadgi National Park in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). Contribution to international significance · The total vertebrate biodiversity of Kosciuszko National Park compares very well with other (large) temperate montane/alpine national parks in North and South America, and is significant for the presence of representatives of all subclasses and infraclasses of mammals (Monotremata, Marsupialia and Eutheria). The high diversity of reptile species, especially above the snowline, is also notable. · Thirteen vertebrate taxa with populations in the park are listed as threatened or near threatened by the World Conservation Union (IUCN). · The international significance of the mountain pygmy-possum Burramys parvus and a variety of other features lends strength to the acceptance of the area under World Heritage criterion (i). If invertebrates - poorly known at present - are considered, criterion (iii), perhaps criterion (i), and the biodiversity representation aspects of (iv) would be met or exceeded. · Some long-term studies in the park are internationally important in helping to resolve global scientific-conservation questions, and the park is well placed to assist the international investigations into greenhouse climate change and its effects on biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Blundells Flat Area ACT: Management of Natural and Cultural Heritage Values
    BBlluunnddeellllss Fllaatt arreeaa AACCTT:: MMaannaaggeemmeenntt off NNaattuurraall anndd Cuullttuurraall Heerriittaaggee Vaalluueess Background Study for the Friends of ACT Arboreta MMMaaarrrkkk BBBuuutttzzz Blundells Flat area ACT: Management of Natural and Cultural Heritage Values Background Study for the Friends of ACT Arboreta Mark Butz © Mark Butz 2004 Cover colour photographs, inside cover photograph and sketch maps © Mark Butz Cover photograph of John Blundell provided by Canberra & District Historical Society This document may be cited as: Butz, Mark 2004. Blundells Flat area, ACT: Management of natural and cultural heritage values - Background study for the Friends of ACT Arboreta. Friends of ACT Arboreta c/- PO Box 7418 FISHER ACT 2611 Tony Fearnside Kim Wells [email protected] [email protected] Phone 02-6288-7656 Phone 02-6251-8303 Fax 02-6288-0442 Fax 02-6251-8308 The views expressed in this report, along with errors of omission or commission, are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Friends of ACT Arboreta or other sources cited. The author welcomes correction of inaccurate or inappropriate statements or citations in this report, and additional information or suggested sources. Mark Butz Futures by Design ™ PO Box 128 JAMISON CENTRE ACT 2614 [email protected] Mob. 0418-417-635 Fax 02-6251-2173 Abbreviations ACT Australian Capital Territory ACTEW ACTEW Corporation (ACT Electricity & Water); ActewAGL ACTPLA ACT Planning & Land Authority ANBG Australian National Botanic Gardens ANU (SRES) Australian National University (School of Resources, Environment & Society) asl above sea level [elevation] c. about (circa) CDHS Canberra & District Historical Society Co. County – plural Cos. COG Canberra Ornithologists Group CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation E.
    [Show full text]
  • 49.3487 \M?-. ¼1J:\2•
    V APRIL 1967. A / ..- / •1 / was having troubles this month. Articles promised and not received; people out of town or at least not at home; and an editor who does tend to leave things till the last moment. However, all's well that ends well, and here IT is at last. NEWS FROM NEAR AND FA Our very best wishes to Peter and Sally Tormey (ne Holt) who were married in Canberra on Easter Monday. And also to Barry and Lesley McCann who were married recently. Mary Hawkins will be down here at a Conference at the end of May. Peter and Ritva. Sands left Canberra last Thursday for Sheffield, Tasmania, Peter's home town, where they will stay for several months. They will then fly to Finland, Ritva' s native country, and eventually to New York where Peter starts work in September. Jenny Brierley is about to start her nursing training at the Canberra Community Hospital. So we'll know whom to turn to with all our aches and bumps now. Bob de .Viana spent Easter in a charming little village called Itrcote, situated on a lake with mountain& rising beyond. He is forever interested in his bushwalking mates. But how about an article in 'IT' for all your fans, Bob? Roy Hyndman has gone to Perth for two weeks. Warwick Ward sends his regards to. everyone. It seeme he will be staying in S.A. for some time yet. AMAZING BARGAIN SEIKO gents stainless steel, waterproof, shockproof, 17 jewel wrist watch. Thilly guaranteed by Australian agents until January 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Tweed Valley Hospital
    92 Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Tweed Valley Hospital APPENDIX A. TWEED VALLEY HOSPITAL MASTERPLAN (DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION FOOTPRINT) AND TWEED COAST ROAD DEVELOPMENT FOOTPRINT greencap.com.au Adelaide | Auckland | Brisbane | Canberra | Darwin | Melbourne | Newcastle | Perth | Sydney | Wollongong LEGEND 5 . 0 . 0 8 . 0 0 . 6 9 .0 SITE BOUNDARY 0 . 0 1 7 .0 MAXIMUM PLANNING 8.0 0 . 0 1 0 . ENVELOPE ABOVE 0 1 9.0 GROUND LEVEL 0 . 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL AREA MAXIMUM PLANNING 0 . 2 1 ENVELOPE BELOW 0 . 0 E 1 0 . GROUND LEVEL N 3 I 1 0 . L 1 K 1 0 . N 4 RU 1 TREE TRUNK LINE T 0 . 5 E 1 RE 0 . T 6 0M 1 5 0 . APZ OFFSETS - 7 ) 1 06 0 . 0 8 (2 1 PROBABLE MAXIMUM Z T 0 P . 9 A - 67M 1 E 0 . FLOOD LINE 6 7) 0 1 . 0 2 E 201 0 . 1 T 2 0 . F 7 R A 1 AGRICULTURAL BUFFER 0 T . 2 (DR 2 Z 18.0 P S A INDICATIVE BUILDING K L 19.0 ENTRIES E C 0 V . LE 3 PMF 2 O 2 0.0 N R N 0 . 1 U 2 0 . 4 0 2 . 2 2 T .0 2 2 0 . 3 2 0 . 3 2 25.0 COPYRIGHT 2 3 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS WORK IS COPYRIGHT AND CANNOT BE .0 STAFF REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR BY ANY MEANS (GRAPHIC, ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL, INCLUDING PHOTOCOPYING) WITHOUT THE CARPARK 25 .0 WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE PRINCIPAL UNDER THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?
    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve
    FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve This project was supported by NACC NRM and the Shire of Morawa through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program Canna Reserve BioBlitz 2019 Weaving and wonder in the wilderness! The weather may have been hot and dry, but that didn’t stop everyone having fun and learning about the rich biodiversity and conservation value of the wonderful Canna Reserve during the highly successful 2019 BioBlitz. On the 14 - 15 September 2019, NACC NRM together with support from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions and the Shire of Morawa, hosted their third BioBlitz at the Canna Reserve in the Shire of Morawa. Fifty professional biologists and citizen scientists attended the event with people travelling from near and far including Morawa, Perenjori, Geraldton and Perth. After an introduction and Acknowledgement of Country from organisers Jessica Stingemore and Jarna Kendle, the BioBlitz kicked off with participants separating into four teams and heading out to explore Canna Reserve with the goal of identifying as many plants, birds, invertebrates, and vertebrates as possible in a 24 hr period. David Knowles of Spineless Wonders led the invertebrate survey with assistance from, OAM recipient Allen Sundholm, Jenny Borger of Jenny Borger Botanical Consultancy led the plant team, BirdLife Midwest member Alice Bishop guided the bird survey team and David Pongracz from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions ran the vertebrate surveys with assistance from volunteer Corin Desmond. The BioBlitz got off to a great start identifying 80 plant species during the first survey with many more species to come and even a new orchid find for the reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Ripple-Leaf Muttonwood (Rapanea Species a Richmond River) July 2004 © NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, 2004
    Approved NSW & National Recovery Plan Ripple-leaf Muttonwood (Rapanea species A Richmond River) July 2004 © NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, 2004. This work is copyright. However, material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation 43 Bridge Street (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 Tel: 02 9585 6444 www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for the Ripple-leaf Muttonwood (Rapanea species A Richmond River) are best directed to: The Ripple-leaf Muttonwood Recovery Co-ordinator Threatened Species Unit, North East Branch NSW Department of Environment and Conservation Locked Bag 914 Coffs Harbour NSW 2450 Tel: 02 6651 5946 Cover illustrator: Kersten Tuckey This plan should be cited as follows: NSW Department of Environment and Conservation (2004), Approved Recovery Plan for the Ripple-leaf Muttonwood (Rapanea species A Richmond River), NSW Department of Environment and Conservation, Hurstville. ISBN 1741221382 Approved Recovery Plan Ripple-leaf Muttonwood Recovery Plan for the Ripple-leaf Muttonwood (Rapanea species A Richmond River) Executive Summary This document constitutes the formal National and New South Wales State Recovery Plan for the Ripple-leaf Muttonwood (Rapanea species A Richmond River (J.H. Maiden & J.L. Boorman NSW 26751)) and, as such, considers the conservation requirements of the species across its known range.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Seed Release and Dispersal Mechanisms
    10 Seed Release and Dispersal Mechanisms For seedling recruitment to occur seeds need to be dispersed into an environment that promotes germination and seedling survival. Dispersal consists of two phases. Primary dispersal is defined as the initial transport of seeds or seed-bearing fruits (collectively seeds and fruits are called diaspores) to the ground or water body, or for aerial parasites, a host branch. Secondary dispersal relates to any subsequent movement to the seed’s final resting place. Primary dispersal may be active (e.g. seeds released explosively from the fruit, e.g. dehiscence (opening) of Hardenbergia pods), passive (e.g. seeds fall out when the capsules of Eucalyptus open), or require a vector to aid in seed removal (e.g. wind uplift of winged seeds of Hakea or winged fruits of Nuytsia; Amyema berries consumed by mistletoe birds). Secondary dispersal involves either a biotic (e.g. ants) or environmental (e.g. wind, water) vector, and it is usually a different mechanism than that involved in primary dispersal. While primary dispersal is usually only for a few metres, secondary dispersal may cover several kilometres, and sometimes thousands for tiny seeds. This chapter covers some of the dispersal mechanisms exhibited by the SouthWest flora following their release. Terminology used to describe seed dispersal mechanisms is provided in Table 10.1. Table 10.1: Seed dispersal terminology. Term Definition Anemochory Wind dispersed Chamaechory Dispersal by rolling along the ground (wind assisted) Zoochory Animal dispersed (general) Myrmecochory Ant dispersed Ornithochory Bird dispersed Mammalochory Mammal dispersed Hydrochory Water dispersed Barochory Unassisted (gravity causes seeds to drop to the ground) Autochory Dispersal assisted by the actions of the parent plant (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Androcalva Bivillosa
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister approved this conservation advice and included this species in the Critically Endangered category, effective from 11/05/2018. Conservation Advice Androcalva bivillosa Summary of assessment Conservation status Androcalva bivillosa has been found to be eligible for listing in the Critically Endangered category as outlined in the attached assessment. Reason for conservation assessment by the Threatened Species Scientific Committee This advice follows assessment of information provided by Western Australia as part of the Common Assessment Method process, to systematically review species that are inconsistently listed under the EPBC Act and relevant state/territory legislation or lists. More information on the Common Assessment Method is available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/cam The information in this assessment has been compiled by the relevant state/territory government. In adopting this assessment under the EPBC Act, this document forms the Approved Conservation Advice for this species as required under s266B of the EPBC Act. Public consultation Notice of the proposed amendment and a consultation document was made available for public comment for 32 business days between 16 August 2017 and 29 September 2017. Any comments received that were relevant to the survival of the species were considered by the Committee as part of the assessment process. Recovery plan A recovery plan for this species under the EPBC Act is not recommended, because the Approved Conservation Advice provides sufficient direction to implement priority actions and mitigate against key threats. The relevant state/territory may decide to develop a plan under its equivalent legislation.
    [Show full text]