DOCSLIB.ORG

JABG22P101 Barker

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2008 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 22 (2008) 101 –104 © 2008 Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia NOTES & SH ORT COMMUNICATIONS New combinations in Pterostylis and Caladenia and other name changes in the Orchidaceae of South Australia R.M. Barker & R.J. Bates State Herbarium of South Australia, Plant Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Combinations are provided in Pterostylis and Caladenia (Orchidaceae) for new species initially described in the segregate genera Arachnorchis, Bunochilus and Oligochaetochilus. Recircumscription of existing species has led to some new species being recognised for South Australia and Prasophyllum sp. West Coast (R.Tate AD96945167) is now known as Prasophyllum catenemum D.L.Jones. Introduction within Pterostylis2 R.Br. will not be adopted. Both In the past, when there have been disagreements genera in the wider sense are recognised as monophyletic between botanists about the level at which species (Hopper & Brown 2004; Jones & Clements 2002b) should be recognised, the arguments have not impinged and for the practical purpose of running Australia’s particularly on the outside community. Today, with Virtual Herbarium (2008) the broader generic concept botanical names increasingly being added to databases will continue to be applied (Entwisle 2003; Entwisle & and databases being much more readily available to Weston 2005). users through the internet, there is often a need for The issue of the segregate orchid genera has yet to practical purposes for the recognition of a single name be addressed by the CHAH committee of the Australian for a particular species, i.e. a ‘preferred’ name for each Plant Census (2008), whose role it is to agree on a taxon. Herbaria, amongst other institutions, tend to ‘preferred name’ for each Australian taxon. It should be adopt a conservative approach in the adoption of new stressed that alternative taxonomies are still available to names, preferring to wait until there has been sufficient those who wish to use them and just because one name testing of new concepts and hence greater stability and has been chosen for use in the major databases supported acceptance of these names (Entwisle & Weston 2005). by the Australian herbaria this does not imply that Rushing in and adopting name changes as they occur can alternatives are incorrect or scientifically unsupported. lead to a later reversal of a decision and an unnecessary New combinations in Caladenia and Pterostylis confusion of names. For instance, within the segregate genera of Caladenia R.Br., earlier combinations made in A number of new names applying to South Australian both Calonema (Lindl.) D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem. (Jones species have been published by Jones in the genera et al. 2001) and Calonemorchis Szlach. (Szlachetko Arachnorchis D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem. (Jones 2006a) 2002) were subsequently found to be superfluous or and Bunochilus D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem. (Jones 2006b). to contravene the rules of the International Code of Alternative names are not available in Caladenia Botanical Nomenclature (McNeill et al. 2006). Another and Pterostylis, respectively, and the necessary new example within orchids is the transfer of species from combinations are made in this paper. This follows Corunastylis Fitzg. to Genoplesium R.Br. and then back similar publications by Backhouse (2007) and Thiele again (Jones et al. 2002; see below). & Brown (2007), who made the relevant combinations Presently, the decision has been made by the Council for Victoria and Western Australia, respectively. Other of Heads of Australasian Herbaria (CHAH) that the many unpublished phrase or manuscript names which have segregate genera being proposed by Jones et al. (2001) also been used for the species have been listed where 1 within Caladenia and by Jones & Clements (2002b) 2 Diplodium Sw., Oligochaetochilus Szlach., Bunochilus D.L. Jones & M.A.Clem., Taurantha D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem., 1 Arachnorchis D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem., Petalochilus R.S. Linguella D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem., Urochilus D.L.Jones Rogers, Jonesiopsis Szlach. and Stegostyla D.L.Jones & & M.A.Clem., Speculantha D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem. and M.A.Clem. for South Australia Plumatichilos Szlach. for South Australia 101 R.M. Barker & R.J. Bates J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 22 (2008) appropriate. The International Plant Names Index (2008) Caladenia leptochila subsp. dentata (D.L.Jones) R.J. and the Australian Plant Name Index (2008) have been Bates, comb. nov. used to check that the epithets in the new combinations Basionym: Arachnorchis leptochila subsp. dentata have not already been used in the genus. D.L.Jones, Austral. Orchid Res. 5: 62 (2006). — Type: South Australia, Alligator Gorge National Park, 9 Oct. 1988, D.L.Jones 2966 & M.Garratt (holo: CANB; iso: Caladenia aurulenta (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. AD, MEL). Basionym: Arachnorchis aurulenta D.L.Jones, Orchadian 15(2): 90–91 (2005). — Type: South Australia, Gawler Caladenia saxatilis (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. Ranges, Scrubby Creek Station, 9 Sep. 2000, D.L.Jones Basionym: Arachnorchis saxatilis D.L.Jones Austral. 17452 & M.Garratt (holo: CANB; iso: AD, BRI, MEL, Orchid Res. 5: 63 (2006). — Type: South Australia, NSW, PERTH). Eastern outskirts of Mt Remarkable National Park, Alligator Gorge side, 5 Sept. 1999, D.L.Jones 16711 & Caladenia ensigera (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. M.Garratt (holo: CANB). Basionym: Arachnorchis ensigera D.L.Jones, Austral. Caladenia aff. fitzgeraldii: Bates & Weber, pl. 44 (1990). Orchid Res. 5: 59 (2006). — Type: South Australia, Mt Caladenia stellata auct. non D.L.Jones: Barker et al. (2005), Remarkable National Park, Circle Track, 5 Sep. 1999, D.L. partly. Jones 16698 & M.Garratt (holo: CANB; iso: AD, MEL). Caladenia strigosa (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. Caladenia flindersica (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. Basionym: Arachnorchis strigosa D.L.Jones, Austral. Orchid Res. 5: 57 (2006). — Type: South Australia, Basionym: Arachnorchis flindersica D.L.Jones, Austral. Ruakkan, 25 Sep. 2005, R.Bates 65973 (holo: CANB Orchid Res. 5: 60 (2006). — Type: South Australia, 673104; iso: AD). Alligator Gorge, 4 Sep. 2005, C. & M.Houston 41 (holo: Caladenia australis auct. non G.W.Carr: Barker et al. (2005), CANB; iso: AD, MEL). partly. Caladenia patersonii auct. non R.Br.: Weber & Bates (1986), partly. Caladenia zephyra (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. Caladenia sp. Inland (F.A.Mason 300) R.J.Bates in W.R.Barker et al., J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. Suppl. 1: 194 Basionym: Arachnorchis zephyra D.L.Jones, Austral. (2005), partly (only with respect to FR and NL records). Orchid Res. 5: 65 (2006). — Type: South Australia, Arachnorchis aff. arenaria ‘Flinders’: R.J.Bates, Orchids S. Carrappee Hill Conservation Park, D.T.Rouse 186, Austral. CD-ROM (2007), pro syn. M.Duncan, G.Backhouse & P.McCauley (holo: CANB). Caladenia sp. Inland (F.A.Mason 300) R.J.Bates in W.R.Barker et al., J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. Suppl. 1: 194 Caladenia fuliginosa (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. (2005), partly (only with respect to specimens from EP). Basionym: Arachnorchis fuliginosa D.L.Jones, Austral. Caladenia arenaria auct. non Fitzg.: Jessop (1993), partly. Orchid Res. 5: 61 (2006). — Type: South Australia, Yorke Caladenia patersonii auct. non R.Br.: Bates & Weber (1990), Peninsula, Corny Point–Marion Bay Road, 2 Sep. 2000, partly. D.L.Jones 17230 & M.Garratt (holo: CANB; iso: AD, MEL). Pterostylis flavovirens (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. Caladenia patersonii var. suaveolens Nicholls. Caladenia fragrantissima D.L.Jones & G.W.Carr subsp. Basionym: Bunochilus flavovirens D.L.Jones, Austral. fragrantissima, partly. Orchid Res. 5: 132 (2006). — Type: South Australia, Port Caladenia patersonii auct. non R.Br.: Weber & Bates (1986), Lincoln, coastal reserve towards Lincoln Cove, 7 Aug. partly. 1995, D.L.Jones 14110 & B.E.Jones (holo: CANB). Pterostylis sp. Coastal (R.Bates 37621) R.J.Bates in W.R.Barker et al., J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. Suppl. 1: 201 Caladenia interanea (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. (2005), partly. Basionym: Arachnorchis interanea D.L.Jones, Orchadian Pterostylis longifolia auct. non R.Br.: Weber & Bates (1986), 15(2): 91–92 (2005). — Type: South Australia, W end of partly. the Gawler Ranges, Mt Granite, 9 Sep. 2000, D.L.Jones 17455 & M.Garratt (holo: CANB; iso: AD, MEL). Pterostylis littoralis (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. Caladenia tensa auct. non G.W.Carr: Barker et al. (2005), Basionym: Bunochilus littoralis D.L.Jones, Austral. partly. Orchid Res. 5: 133 (2006). — Type: South Australia, Bog Caladenia tentaculata auct. non Schltdl.: Bates & Weber Road, near Sunland, opposite Lake St Clair, 7 July 1999, (1990), partly. D.L.Jones 16461, M.Garratt & R.Bates (holo: CANB; Caladenia dilatata auct. non R.Br.: Weber & Bates (1986), isotype AD). partly. Pterostylis sp. Coastal (R.Bates 37621) R.J.Bates in W.R.Barker et al., J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. Suppl. 1: 201 Caladenia intuta (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov. (2005), partly. Basionym: Arachnorchis intuta D.L.Jones, Orchadian 14(12): 561–562 (2005). — Type: South Australia, Yorke Pterostylis viriosa (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates, comb. nov.
Recommended publications
  • Recovery Plan for the Tallong Midge Orchid (Genoplesium Plumosum)

    Recovery Plan for the Tallong Midge Orchid (Genoplesium Plumosum)

    Approved Recovery Plan Recovery Plan for the Tallong Midge Orchid (Genoplesium plumosum) NSW NATIONAL PARKS AND May 2002 WILDLIFE SERVICE © NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, 2002. This work is copyright, however material presented in this Plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from NPWS. NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, 43 Bridge Street, (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 Tel: 02 9585 6444 www.npws.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for the Tallong Midge Orchid are best directed to: The Tallong Midge Orchid Recovery Team Coordinator, Threatened Species Unit, NPWS Southern Directorate, PO Box 2115, Queanbeyan NSW 2620 Ph: (02) 6298 9700 Or The Director, Regional Wildlife Programs, Wildlife Australia Branch, Environment Australia, PO Box 636, Canberra ACT 2601 Ph: (02) 6274 1111 Cover illustration: Tallong Midge Orchid. Photographer: John Briggs This Plan should be cited as following: NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (2002). Approved Recovery Plan for the Tallong Midge Orchid (Genoplesium plumosum). NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Hurstville NSW. ISBN 07 313 6457 0 Approved Recovery Plan The Tallong Midge Orchid Recovery Plan for the Tallong Midge Orchid (Genoplesium plumosum) Executive Summary This document constitutes the formal National and New South Wales State Recovery Plan for the Tallong Midge Orchid Genoplesium plumosum. It considers the conservation requirements of the species across its known range, identifies the future actions to be taken to ensure its long-term viability and the parties who will carry these out.
  • Framework for Using and Updating Ecological Models to Inform Bushfire Management Planning

    Framework for Using and Updating Ecological Models to Inform Bushfire Management Planning

    Framework for Using and Updating Ecological Models to Inform Bushfire Management Planning Final report Policy and Planning Division, Forest, Fire and Regions Acknowledgements Simon Watson, Katie Taylor, Thu Phan (MER Unit), Lucas Bluff, Rob Poore, Mick Baker, Victor Hurley, Hayley Coviello, Rowhan Marshall, Luke Smith, Penny Orbell, Matt Chick, Mary Titcumb, Sarah Kelly, Frazer Wilson, Evelyn Chia (DELWP Risk and Evaluation teams), Finley Roberts, Andrew Blackett, Imogen Fraser (Forest and Fire Risk Assessment Unit), and other staff from Forest, Fire and Regions Division, Bioodiversity Division, Arthur Rylah Institute, University of Melbourne, Parks Victoria, Country Fire Authority and Department of Land, Water, Environment and Planning who attended workshops. Jim Radford kindly provided comments on an earlier draft of this document. Authors Libby Rumpff, Nevil Amos and Josephine MacHunter Other contributors Kelly, L., Regan, T.J., Walshe, T., Giljohan, K., Bennett, A., Clarke, M., Di Stefano, J., Haslem, A., Leonard, S., McCarthy, M., Muir, A. Sitters, H. York, A., Vesk, P. Photo credit Kohout, M. © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-1-76077-890-3 (pdf/online/MS word) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you, but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication.
  • Otanewainuku ED (Report Prepared on 13 August 2013)

    Otanewainuku ED (Report Prepared on 13 August 2013)

    1 NZFRI collection wish list for Otanewainuku ED (Report prepared on 13 August 2013) Fern Ally Isolepis cernua Lycopodiaceae Isolepis inundata Lycopodium fastigiatum Isolepis marginata Lycopodium scariosum Isolepis pottsii Psilotaceae Isolepis prolifera Tmesipteris lanceolata Lepidosperma australe Lepidosperma laterale Gymnosperm Schoenoplectus pungens Cupressaceae Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Schoenus apogon Cupressus macrocarpa Schoenus tendo Pinaceae Uncinia filiformis Pinus contorta Uncinia gracilenta Pinus patula Uncinia rupestris Pinus pinaster Uncinia scabra Pinus ponderosa Hemerocallidaceae Pinus radiata Dianella nigra Pinus strobus Phormium cookianum subsp. hookeri Podocarpaceae Phormium tenax Podocarpus totara var. totara Iridaceae Prumnopitys taxifolia Crocosmia xcrocosmiiflora Libertia grandiflora Monocotyledon Libertia ixioides Agapanthaceae Watsonia bulbillifera Agapanthus praecox Juncaceae Alliaceae Juncus articulatus Allium triquetrum Juncus australis Araceae Juncus conglomeratus Alocasia brisbanensis Juncus distegus Arum italicum Juncus edgariae Lemna minor Juncus effusus var. effusus Zantedeschia aethiopica Juncus sarophorus Arecaceae Juncus tenuis var. tenuis Rhopalostylis sapida Luzula congesta Asparagaceae Luzula multiflora Asparagus aethiopicus Luzula picta var. limosa Asparagus asparagoides Orchidaceae Cordyline australis x banksii Acianthus sinclairii Cordyline banksii x pumilio Aporostylis bifolia Asteliaceae Corunastylis nuda Collospermum microspermum Diplodium alobulum Commelinaceae
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?

    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?

    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
  • National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF

    National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972.PDF

    Version: 1.7.2015 South Australia National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 An Act to provide for the establishment and management of reserves for public benefit and enjoyment; to provide for the conservation of wildlife in a natural environment; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1—Preliminary 1 Short title 5 Interpretation Part 2—Administration Division 1—General administrative powers 6 Constitution of Minister as a corporation sole 9 Power of acquisition 10 Research and investigations 11 Wildlife Conservation Fund 12 Delegation 13 Information to be included in annual report 14 Minister not to administer this Act Division 2—The Parks and Wilderness Council 15 Establishment and membership of Council 16 Terms and conditions of membership 17 Remuneration 18 Vacancies or defects in appointment of members 19 Direction and control of Minister 19A Proceedings of Council 19B Conflict of interest under Public Sector (Honesty and Accountability) Act 19C Functions of Council 19D Annual report Division 3—Appointment and powers of wardens 20 Appointment of wardens 21 Assistance to warden 22 Powers of wardens 23 Forfeiture 24 Hindering of wardens etc 24A Offences by wardens etc 25 Power of arrest 26 False representation [3.7.2015] This version is not published under the Legislation Revision and Publication Act 2002 1 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972—1.7.2015 Contents Part 3—Reserves and sanctuaries Division 1—National parks 27 Constitution of national parks by statute 28 Constitution of national parks by proclamation 28A Certain co-managed national
  • Intro Outline

    Intro Outline

    THE REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF TWO TERRESTRIAL ORCHIDS, CALADENIA RIGIDA AND CALADENIA TENTACULATA RENATE FAAST Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Adelaide, South Australia December, 2009 i . DEcLARATION This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution to Renate Faast and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis (as listed below) resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University's digital research repository, the Library catalogue, the Australasian Digital Theses Program (ADTP) and also through web search engines. Published works contained within this thesis: Faast R, Farrington L, Facelli JM, Austin AD (2009) Bees and white spiders: unravelling the pollination' syndrome of C aladenia ri gída (Orchidaceae). Australian Joumal of Botany 57:315-325. Faast R, Facelli JM (2009) Grazrngorchids: impact of florivory on two species of Calademz (Orchidaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 57:361-372. Farrington L, Macgillivray P, Faast R, Austin AD (2009) Evaluating molecular tools for Calad,enia (Orchidaceae) species identification.
  • Gondwanan Origin of Major Monocot Groups Inferred from Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis Kåre Bremer Uppsala University

    Gondwanan Origin of Major Monocot Groups Inferred from Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis Kåre Bremer Uppsala University

    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 3 2006 Gondwanan Origin of Major Monocot Groups Inferred from Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis Kåre Bremer Uppsala University Thomas Janssen Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Bremer, Kåre and Janssen, Thomas (2006) "Gondwanan Origin of Major Monocot Groups Inferred from Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/3 Aliso 22, pp. 22-27 © 2006, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden GONDWANAN ORIGIN OF MAJOR MONO COT GROUPS INFERRED FROM DISPERSAL-VICARIANCE ANALYSIS KARE BREMERl.3 AND THOMAS JANSSEN2 lDepartment of Systematic Botany, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Norbyvagen l8D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden; 2Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Departement de Systematique et Evolution, USM 0602: Taxonomie et collections, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France 3Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Historical biogeography of major monocot groups was investigated by biogeographical analysis of a dated phylogeny including 79 of the 81 monocot families using the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II (APG II) classification. Five major areas were used to describe the family distributions: Eurasia, North America, South America, Africa including Madagascar, and Australasia including New Guinea, New Caledonia, and New Zealand. In order to investigate the possible correspondence with continental breakup, the tree with its terminal distributions was fitted to the geological area cladogram «Eurasia, North America), (Africa, (South America, Australasia») and to alternative area cladograms using the TreeFitter program.
  • Ecological Survey

    Ecological Survey

    Central Eyre Iron Project Mining Lease Proposal APPENDIX J ECOLOGICAL SURVEY COPYRIGHT Copyright © IRD Mining Operations Pty Ltd and Iron Road Limited, 2015 All rights reserved This document and any related documentation is protected by copyright owned by IRD Mining Operations Pty Ltd and Iron Road Limited. The content of this document and any related documentation may only be copied and distributed for purposes of section 35A of the Mining Act, 1971 (SA) and otherwise with the prior written consent of IRD Mining Operations Pty Ltd and Iron Road Limited. DISCLAIMER A declaration has been made on behalf of IRD Mining Operations Pty Ltd by its Managing Director that he has taken reasonable steps to review the information contained in this document and to ensure its accuracy as at 5 November 2015. Subject to that declaration: (a) in writing this document, Iron Road Limited has relied on information provided by specialist consultants, government agencies, and other third parties. Iron Road Limited has reviewed all information to the best of its ability but does not take responsibility for the accuracy or completeness; and (b) this document has been prepared for information purposes only and, to the full extent permitted by law, Iron Road Limited, in respect of all persons other than the relevant government departments, makes no representation and gives no warranty or undertaking, express or implied, in respect to the information contained herein, and does not accept responsibility and is not liable for any loss or liability whatsoever arising as a result of any person acting or refraining from acting on any information contained within it.
  • Australian Natural History Australian Natural History Published Quarterly by the Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney

    Australian Natural History Australian Natural History Published Quarterly by the Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney

    AUSTRALIAN NATURAL HISTORY AUSTRALIAN NATURAL HISTORY PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM, 6-8 COLLEGE STREET, SYDNEY. TRUST PRESIDENT, JOE BAKER. MUSEUM DIRECTOR, DESMOND GRIFFIN VOLUM E 20 NUMBER 6 1981 This sun orchid, known as Thelymitra Altocumulus developed from a sheet of altostratus provided this memorable dawn near Mt Watt, truncata, is thought to be a natural hybrid Central Australia. Photo Robert Jones. between two commoner species, T. ixioides and T. pauciflora (or T. nuda). Obviously hybridisation is an uncommon or local phenomenon, or the parent species would lose their distinctness. Photo D. McAlpine. EDITOR CONTENTS Roland Hughes FROM THE INSIDE 173 ASSISTANT EDITOR Editorial Barbara Purse CIRCULATION PAGEANTRY IN THE SKIES 175 Bruce Colbey by Julian Hollis AMAZING ORCHIDS OF SOUTHERN AUSTRALIA 181 by David McAlpine Annual Subscription: Australia, $A8.00; New MAMMALS FOR ALL SEASONS 185 Zealand, $NZ11.50; other countries, $A9.50. by Roland Hughes Single copies: Australia, $A2.20, $A2.65 posted; New Zealand, $NZ3.00; other countries, $A3.40. COMMON BENT-WING BAT, Miniopterus schreibersii 187 For renewal or subscription please forward the Centrefold appropriate cheque/money order or bankcard number and authority made payable to Australian Natural History, the Australian Museum, PO Box A LOOK AT THE DINGO 191 A285, Sydney South 2001. by Bob Harden New Zealand subscribers should make cheque or money order payable to the New Zealand Govern­ DINOSAUR DIGGING IN VICTORIA 195 ment Printer, Private Bag, Wellington. by Timothy Flannery and Thomas Rich Subscribers from other countries please note that moneys must be paid in Australian currency. IN REVIEW 199 Opinions expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily represent the policies or GOOD THINGS GROW IN GLASS 201 views of the Australian Museum.
  • Orchid Seed Coat Morphometrics. Molvray and Kores. 1995

    Orchid Seed Coat Morphometrics. Molvray and Kores. 1995

    American Journal of Botany 82(11): 1443-1454. 1995 . CHARACTER ANALYSIS OF THE SEED COAT IN SPIRANTHOIDEAE AND ORCHIDOIDEAE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE DIURIDEAE (ORCHIDACEAE)I MIA MOLVRAy2 AND PAUL J. KORES Department of Biological Sciences, Loyola University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118 Previous work on seed types within Orchidaceae has demonstrated that characters associated with the seed coat may have considerable phylogenetic utility. Application of the se characters has been complicated in practice by the absence of quan­ titative descriptors and in some instances by their apparent lack of congruity with the taxa under con sideration. Using quantitative descriptors of size and shape, we have demonstrated that some of the existing seed classes do not represent well delimited, discrete entities, and we have proposed new seed classes to meet these criteria. In the spiranthoid-orchidoid complex, the characters yielding the most clearly delimited shape classes are cell number and variability and degree and stochasticity of medial cell elongation. Of lesser, but still appreciable, significance are the pre sence of varying types and degrees of intercellular gaps, and some, but not all, features of cell walls. Four seed classes are evident on the basis of these characters in Spiranthoideae and Orchidoideae. These seed types are briefly described, and their distribution among the taxa examined for this study is reported. It is hoped that these more strictly delimited seed classes will faci litate phylogenetic analysis in the family. Phylogenetic relationships within the Orchidaceae delimitation of the seed coat characters within the two have been discussed extensively in a series of recent pub­ putatively most primitive subfamilies of monandrous or­ lications by Garay (1960, 1972), Dressler (1981, 1986, chids and evaluates the util ity of these characters for the 1990a, b, c, 1993), Rasmussen (1982, 1986), Burns-Bal­ purpose of phylogenetic inference, extends this avenue of ogh and Funk (1986), and Chase et aI.
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?

    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
  • Botanical Name

    Botanical Name

    Barrm Birrm - Plant List Common Name Botanical Name Family 1 Thin-leaf or Snake Wattle Acacia aculeatissima Mimosaceae 2 Silver Wattle Acacia dealbata Mimosaceae 3 Spreading Wattle Acacia genistifolia Mimosaceae 4 Ploughshare Wattle Acacia gunnii Mimosaceae 5 Cinnamon Wattle Acacia leprosa var. uninervia Mimosaceae 6 Black Wattle Acacia mearnsii Mimosaceae 7 Blackwood Acacia melanoxylon Mimosaceae 8 Dwarf Silver-wattle Acacia nano-dealbata Mimosaceae 9 Hedge Wattle Acacia paradoxa Mimosaceae 10 Wattle hybrid Acacia paradoxa x leprosa Mimosaceae 11 Wirilda Acacia provincialis Mimosaceae 12 Golden Wattle Acacia pycnantha Mimosaceae 13 Hop Wattle Acacia stricta Mimosaceae 14 Dandenong Cinnamon-wattle Acacia strictophylla Mimosaceae 15 Prickly Moses Acacia verticillata Mimosaceae 16 Bidgee-widgee Acaena novae-zelandiae Rosaceae 17 Sheep's Burr Acaena ovina Rosaceae 18 Small Mosquito-orchid Acianthus pusillus Orchidaceae 19 Trailing Ground-berry Acrotriche prostrata Epacridaceae 20 Honey Pots Acrotriche serrulata Epacridaceae 21 Maidenhair Fern Adiantum aethiopicum Adiantaceae 22 Austral Bugle Ajuga australis Lamiaceae 23 Black Sheoak Allocasuarina littoralis Casuarinaceae 24 Drooping Mistletoe Amyema pendula Loranthaceae 25 Pale Vanilla-lily Arthropodium milleflorum Liliaceae 26 Chocolate Lily Arthropodium strictum Liliaceae 27 Prickly Woodruff Asperula scoparia Rubiaceae 28 Cranberry Heath Astroloma humifusum Epacridaceae 29 Hill Wallaby-grass Austrodanthonia eriantha Poaceae 30 Copper-awned Wallaby-grass Austrodanthonia fulva Poaceae 31