DOCSLIB.ORG

Framework for Using and Updating Ecological Models to Inform Bushfire Management Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Framework for Using and Updating Ecological Models to Inform Bushfire Management Planning Framework for Using and Updating Ecological Models to Inform Bushfire Management Planning Final report Policy and Planning Division, Forest, Fire and Regions Acknowledgements Simon Watson, Katie Taylor, Thu Phan (MER Unit), Lucas Bluff, Rob Poore, Mick Baker, Victor Hurley, Hayley Coviello, Rowhan Marshall, Luke Smith, Penny Orbell, Matt Chick, Mary Titcumb, Sarah Kelly, Frazer Wilson, Evelyn Chia (DELWP Risk and Evaluation teams), Finley Roberts, Andrew Blackett, Imogen Fraser (Forest and Fire Risk Assessment Unit), and other staff from Forest, Fire and Regions Division, Bioodiversity Division, Arthur Rylah Institute, University of Melbourne, Parks Victoria, Country Fire Authority and Department of Land, Water, Environment and Planning who attended workshops. Jim Radford kindly provided comments on an earlier draft of this document. Authors Libby Rumpff, Nevil Amos and Josephine MacHunter Other contributors Kelly, L., Regan, T.J., Walshe, T., Giljohan, K., Bennett, A., Clarke, M., Di Stefano, J., Haslem, A., Leonard, S., McCarthy, M., Muir, A. Sitters, H. York, A., Vesk, P. Photo credit Kohout, M. © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2019 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ISBN 978-1-76077-890-3 (pdf/online/MS word) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you, but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au. Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Project Aims ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 The decision-making framework .................................................................................................................... 2 Why is the decision framework and FAME needed? ................................................................................... 2 Case study insights ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key Outcomes .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Next steps ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Future applications .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Policy drivers ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Project aims, research questions and outputs ............................................................................................ 6 The decision framework.................................................................................................................................. 9 Approach .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Case studies ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Fire Analysis Module for Ecological values (FAME) .................................................................................. 13 Purpose........................................................................................................................................................... 13 Key steps in FAME ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Overarching principles of the module ......................................................................................................... 14 Users of the module ...................................................................................................................................... 14 How was the module developed? ................................................................................................................ 14 Future refinements ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Discussion and Recommended Next Steps................................................................................................ 16 What worked .................................................................................................................................................. 16 Reviewing issues with data, performance measures and uncertainty .................................................... 17 Reviewing the decision framework .............................................................................................................. 24 References ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 Appendix A Output 1: Project Plan ............................................................................................................. 30 Appendix B Output 5: Conceptual framework ............................................................................................ 52 Appendix C Output 8: Process map ............................................................................................................ 68 Appendix D Output 7: Supporting documentation .................................................................................... 86 Appendix E Output 2,3,4: Gap analysis ..................................................................................................... 123 Final report 1 Executive Summary Effectively managing the risks of The decision-making framework fire to ecosystem resilience and We used a structured decision-making framework to threatened species is a core guide decision makers and stakeholders on how to better use ecological models and metrics to inform a commitment of Victoria’s Safer strategic planning process. Structured decision- Together policy. Through making describes both the process of deconstructing decisions into various common components, and the collaboration with Department of broad set of tools used, and is designed to aid Environment, Land, Water and logical and transparent decision-making. Planning, and its partner This approach was designed to facilitate the application of FAME, and to align with the current agencies, the project team have SBMP process, which also draws on the structured developed a decision-making decision-making framework. framework, including a Fire FAME brings together existing ecological data and models into a single platform to support SBMP Analysis Module for Ecological decisions. To ensure the module was tailored to values (FAME), to facilitate more user requirements, the module was developed in close collaboration with end users in DELWP Forest effective and transparent and Fire Regions risk and evaluation teams, the consideration of ecological Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting Unit and the Forest and Fire Assessment Unit. values in strategic fire FAME allows users to analyse and evaluate the management decisions. impact of different fire management strategies on ecological objectives, and automates documentation Project Aims of (i) data inputs, (ii) key decision points undertaken as part of the analyses and (iii) standard outputs. In BNHCRC Emergency Risk Project 1 (ERP1) we FAME is designed to provide transparency and aimed to develop a consolidated framework that consistency in analytical approaches and outputs. describes the development and application of ecological models (including for ecosystem Why is the decision framework and resilience and threatened species) to inform FAME needed? strategic bushfire management planning. Importantly, this project was focused on developing Collaboration with stakeholders identified constraints
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?
    Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Preprint
    A continental measure of urbanness predicts avian response to local urbanization Corey T. Callaghan*1 (0000-0003-0415-2709), Richard E. Major1,2 (0000-0002-1334-9864), William K. Cornwell1,3 (0000-0003-4080-4073), Alistair G. B. Poore3 (0000-0002-3560- 3659), John H. Wilshire1, Mitchell B. Lyons1 (0000-0003-3960-3522) 1Centre for Ecosystem Science; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences; UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 3Evolution and Ecology Research Centre; School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences; UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia *Corresponding author: [email protected] NOTE: This is a pre-print, and the final published version of this manuscript can be found here: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04863 Acknowledgements Funding for this work was provided by the Australian Wildlife Society. Mark Ley, Simon Gorta, and Max Breckenridge were instrumental in conducting surveys in the Blue Mountains. We also are grateful to the numerous volunteers who submit their data to eBird, and the dedicated team of reviewers who ensure the quality of the database. We thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for comments that improved this manuscript. Author contributions CTC, WKC, JHW, and REM conceptualized the data processing to assign urban scores. CTC, MBL, and REM designed the study. CTC performed the data analysis with insight from WKC and AGBP. All authors contributed to drafting and editing the manuscript. Data accessibility Code and data necessary to reproduce these analyses have been uploaded as supplementary material alongside this manuscript, and will be made available as a permanently archived Zenodo repository upon acceptance of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • JABG22P101 Barker
    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2008 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 22 (2008) 101 –104 © 2008 Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia NOTES & SH ORT COMMUNICATIONS New combinations in Pterostylis and Caladenia and other name changes in the Orchidaceae of South Australia R.M. Barker & R.J. Bates State Herbarium of South Australia, Plant Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Combinations are provided in Pterostylis and Caladenia (Orchidaceae) for new species initially described in the segregate genera Arachnorchis, Bunochilus and Oligochaetochilus. Recircumscription of existing species has led to some new species being recognised for South Australia and Prasophyllum sp. West Coast (R.Tate AD96945167) is now known as Prasophyllum catenemum D.L.Jones. Introduction within Pterostylis2 R.Br. will not be adopted. Both In the past, when there have been disagreements genera in the wider sense are recognised as monophyletic between botanists about the level at which species (Hopper & Brown 2004; Jones & Clements 2002b) should be recognised, the arguments have not impinged and for the practical purpose of running Australia’s particularly on the outside community.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Australia: October-November 2016
    Tropical Birding Trip Report Eastern Australia: October-November 2016 A Tropical Birding SET DEPARTURE tour EASTERN AUSTRALIA: From Top to Bottom 23rd October – 11th November 2016 The bird of the trip, the very impressive POWERFUL OWL Tour Leader: Laurie Ross All photos in this report were taken by Laurie Ross/Tropical Birding. 1 www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] Page Tropical Birding Trip Report Eastern Australia: October-November 2016 INTRODUCTION The Eastern Australia Set Departure Tour introduces a huge amount of new birds and families to the majority of the group. We started the tour in Cairns in Far North Queensland, where we found ourselves surrounded by multiple habitats from the tidal mudflats of the Cairns Esplanade, the Great Barrier Reef and its sandy cays, lush lowland and highland rainforests of the Atherton Tablelands, and we even made it to the edge of the Outback near Mount Carbine; the next leg of the tour took us south to Southeast Queensland where we spent time in temperate rainforests and wet sclerophyll forests within Lamington National Park. The third, and my favorite leg, of the tour took us down to New South Wales, where we birded a huge variety of new habitats from coastal heathland to rocky shorelines and temperate rainforests in Royal National Park, to the mallee and brigalow of Inland New South Wales. The fourth and final leg of the tour saw us on the beautiful island state of Tasmania, where we found all 13 “Tassie” endemics. We had a huge list of highlights, from finding a roosting Lesser Sooty Owl in Malanda; to finding two roosting Powerful Owls near Brisbane; to having an Albert’s Lyrebird walk out in front of us at O Reilly’s; to seeing the rare and endangered Regent Honeyeaters in the Capertee Valley, and finding the endangered Swift Parrot on Bruny Island, in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Complete Work
    © The Authors, 2016. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2016 Records of the Australian Museum (2016) Vol. 68, issue number 5, pp. 201–230. ISSN 0067-1975 (print), ISSN 2201-4349 (online) http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.68.2016.1668 The Late Cenozoic Passerine Avifauna from Rackham’s Roost Site, Riversleigh, Australia JACQUELINE M.T. NGUYEN,1,2* SUZANNE J. HAND,2 MICHAEL ARCHER2 1 Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 1 William Street, Sydney New South Wales 2010, Australia 2 PANGEA Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia [email protected] · [email protected] · [email protected] ABstRACT. The Riversleigh World Heritage Area, north-western Queensland, is one of the richest Cenozoic deposits in Australia for passerine fossils. Most of the Riversleigh passerine remains derive from the late Cenozoic Rackham’s Roost Site. Here we describe 38 fossils from this site, which represent eight extant families of passerine birds. These fossils include the oldest records of Maluridae (fairywrens and allies), Acanthizidae (acanthizid warblers), Pomatostomidae (Australo-Papuan babblers), Petroicidae (Australasian robins), Estrildidae (estrildid finches), Locustellidae (songlarks and grassbirds) and Acrocephalidae (reed warblers) in Australia, and the oldest records globally of Maluridae, Acanthizidae, Pomatostomidae, Petroicidae and Estrildidae. The fossils also include the oldest known representatives of the major radiation Passerida sensu stricto in the Australian fossil record, indicating that the second dispersal event of this group had already occurred in this region at least by the early Pleistocene. In describing the Rackham’s Roost fossils, we have identified suites of postcranial characters that we consider diagnostic for several Australian passerine families.
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for Twenty-One Threatened Orchids in South-Eastern Australia
    DRAFT for public comment National Recovery Plan for Twenty-one Threatened Orchids in South-eastern Australia Mike Duncan and Fiona Coates Prepared by Mike Duncan and Fiona Coates, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Heidelberg, Victoria Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, March 2010. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2010 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-74242-224-4 (online) This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Duncan, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Biodiversity – Responses to Fire
    AUSTRALIA’S BIODIVERSITY – RESPONSES TO FIRE Plants, birds and invertebrates A.M. Gill, J.C.Z. Woinarski, A. York Biodiversity Technical Paper, No. 1 Cover photograph credits Group of 3 small photos, front cover: • Cockatiel. The Cockatiel is one of a group of highly mobile birds which track resource-rich areas. These areas fluctuate across broad landscapes in response to local rainfall or fire events. Large flocks may congregate on recently-burnt areas. /Michael Seyfort © Nature Focus • Fern regeneration post-fire, Clyde Mountain, NSW, 1988. /A. Malcolm Gill • These bull ants (Myrmecia gulosa) are large ants which generally build small mounds and prefer open areas in which to forage for food. They are found on frequently burnt sites. Despite their fierce appearance, they feed mainly on plant products. /Alan York. Small photo, lower right, front cover: • Fuel reduction burning in dry forest. This burn is towards the “hotter” end of the desirable range. /Alan York Large photo on spine: • Forest fire, Kapalga, NT, 1990. /Malcolm Gill Small photo, back cover: • Cycad response after fire near Darwin, NT. /Malcolm Gill ISBN 0 642 21422 0 Published by the Department of the Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia, 1999 Information presented in this document may be copied for personal use or pub- lished for educational purposes, provided that any extracts are acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department, or of the Commonwealth of Australia. Biodiversity Convention and Strategy Section Department of the Environment and Heritage GPO Box 636 CANBERRA ACT 2601 General enquiries, telephone 1800 803772 Design: Design One Solutions, Canberra Printing: Goanna Print, Canberra Printed in Australia on recycled Australian paper AUSTRALIA’S BIODIVERSITY – RESPONSES TO FIRE Plants, birds and invertebrates A.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Bird Trail
    21/12/10 10:03 AM 10:03 21/12/10 1 ka1479_A3DL_ART2.indd Lithgow Visitor Information Centre Oberon Visitor Information Centre Cnr Ross Street & Edith Road, Oberon Blue Mountains Heritage Centre, Great Western Highway, Glenbrook, Magpies, Honeyeaters, Treecreepers and Fantails. and Treecreepers Honeyeaters, Magpies, Great Western Highway, Lithgow Thornbills, Silvereyes, Scrubwrens, Parrots, Parrots, Scrubwrens, Silvereyes, Thornbills, End of Govetts Leap Raod watering places. These tolerant species include include species tolerant These places. watering visitbluemountains.com.au you are standing quietly near their feeding and and feeding their near quietly standing are you Information Centres: Phone: (02) 4787 8877 Phone: (02) 6329 8210 Echo Point, Katoomba Phone: 1300 760 276 if away, metres few a only from them watch Phone: 1300 653 408 Phone: 1300 653 408 Blue Mountains to you for happy are species bird our of Many National Parks sometimes run ahead of you. of ahead run sometimes along the walking tracks the Bassian Thrush will will Thrush Bassian the tracks walking the along the Eastern Yellow Robin. If you walk slowly slowly walk you If Robin. Yellow Eastern the Shrike-thrush, the Rockwarbler (Origma) and and (Origma) Rockwarbler the Shrike-thrush, few of our most inquisitive species are the Grey Grey the are species inquisitive most our of few O’Connell (from Oberon 238km) (Abercrombie Road Tablelands Wa and Canberra vi To Taralga, Goulburn Bathurs A you. at look and come may birds our of t some view the admiring or rest a picnic, a Call in at any one of our Accredited Visitor Information Centres for advice and assistance from trained local staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary: Wimmera, Victoria
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Sustainability of Native Fauna in NSW State of the Catchments 2010
    State of the catchments 2010 Native fauna Technical report series Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Assessing the sustainability of native fauna in NSW State of the catchments 2010 Paul Mahon Scott King Clare O’Brien Candida Barclay Philip Gleeson Allen McIlwee Sandra Penman Martin Schulz Office of Environment and Heritage Monitoring, evaluation and reporting program Technical report series Native vegetation Native fauna Threatened species Invasive species Riverine ecosystems Groundwater Marine waters Wetlands Estuaries and coastal lakes Soil condition Land management within capability Economic sustainability and social well-being Capacity to manage natural resources © 2011 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage The State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this technical report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to
    [Show full text]