AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements AUSTRALIAN ORCHID NAME INDEX (27/4/2006) by Mark A. Clements and David L. Jones Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research/Australian National Herbarium GPO Box 1600 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Corresponding author: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Australian Orchid Name Index (AONI) provides the currently accepted scientific names, together with their synonyms, of all Australian orchids including those in external territories. The appropriate scientific name for each orchid taxon is based on data published in the scientific or historical literature, and/or from study of the relevant type specimens or illustrations and study of taxa as herbarium specimens, in the field or in the living state. Structure of the index: Genera and species are listed alphabetically. Accepted names for taxa are in bold, followed by the author(s), place and date of publication, details of the type(s), including where it is held and assessment of its status. The institution(s) where type specimen(s) are housed are recorded using the international codes for Herbaria (Appendix 1) as listed in Holmgren et al’s Index Herbariorum (1981) continuously updated, see [http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp]. Citation of authors follows Brummit & Powell (1992) Authors of Plant Names; for book abbreviations, the standard is Taxonomic Literature, 2nd edn. (Stafleu & Cowan 1976-88; supplements, 1992-2000); and periodicals are abbreviated according to B-P-H/S (Bridson, 1992) [http://www.ipni.org/index.html]. Synonyms are provided with relevant information on place of publication and details of the type(s). They are indented and listed in chronological order under the accepted taxon name. Synonyms are also cross- referenced under genus. Notes are included for some taxa, immediately following information on the types. The distribution in Australia of each taxon is provided using the abbreviations for State botanical districts (Appendix 2). Should a species also occur outside Australia, the countries in which it is known to occur are listed according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Common Country Coding (Appendix 3) [http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html]. Hybrids: The occurrence of natural hybrids in the wild is of interest but has caused some problems in classification. Inter-specific hybrids are treated at the same rank as species following the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Greuter, et al., 2000) [http://www.bgbm.org/iapt/nomenclature/code/SaintLouis/0000St.Luistitle.htm], but are differentiated by the placement of the symbol “×” between the generic and specific names. In the case of inter-generic hybrids, the symbol “×” is placed before the hybrid generic name. Abbreviations: ! = specimen seen, viewed, studied †= destroyed, dead * = exotic species or hybrids naturalised in Australia ** = exotic species thought to be introduced into or misinterpreted as occurring in Australia References: Bridson, G. D. R. 1991. B-P-H/S : Botanico-periodicum-Huntianum. Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh. Brummitt, R. K. & Powell, C. E. 1992. Authors of plant names. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Kew. Greuter, W., McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet, H.-M., Demoulin, V., Filgueiras, T. S., Nicolson, D. H., Silva, P. C., Skog, J. E., Trehane, P., Turland, N. J. & Hawksworth, D. L. 2000. International code of botanical nomenclature (St. Louis Code) : adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress, St. Louis, Missouri, July-August 1999. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein, Germany. Holmgren, P. K., Keuken, W. & Schofield, E. K. 1981. Index herbariorum Part 1 The herbaria of the world. Bohn Scheltema and Holkema, Utrecht. Lawrence, G. H. M., Gunther Buchheim, A. F., Daniels, G. S. & Dolezal, H. 1968. B-P-H : Botanico- Periodicum-Huntianum. Hunt Botanical Library, Pittsburgh. Stafleu, F. A. & Cowan, R. S. 1976-1988. Taxonomic literature : a selective guide to botanical publications and collections with dates, commentaries and types. Bohn Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht. Stafleu, F. A. & Mennega, E. A. (1992- ). Taxonomic literature : a selective guide to botanical publications and collections with dates, commentaries and types Supplement. Koeltz Scientific Books, Köningsberg. GENERA AND SPECIES INDEX: ABAXIANTHUS Abaxianthus M.A.Clem. et D.L.Jones, Orchadian 13(11): 485 (2002). Type species: Desmotrichum convexum Blume. Abaxianthus convexus (Blume) M.A.Clem. et D.L.Jones, Orchadian 13(11): 485 (2002). Basionym: Desmotrichum convexum Blume, Bijdr. 1: 330 (1825); Dendrobium convexum (Blume) Lindl., Gen. sp. orchid. pl. 76 (1830); Callista convexa (Blume) Kuntze, Revis. gen. pl. 2: 654 (1891); Ephemerantha convexa (Blume) P.Hunt et Summerh., Taxon 10: 103 (1961); Flickingeria convexa (Blume) A.Hawkes, Orchid Weekly 2: 454 (1961). Type: Java, Mt. Salag, Apr., C.Blume s.n. (holo L!). Dist: Qco; SB, PG, ID. ACIANTHELLA Acianthella D.L.Jones et M.A.Clem., Orchadian 14(7): 331 (Mar 2004). Type species: Microstylis amplexicaulis F.M.Bailey (Acianthus amplexicaulis (F.M.Bailey) Rolfe). Acianthopsis Szlach., Polish Bot. J. 46(2): 143 (31 Dec 2001 [June 2002]), nom. illeg., non D.L.Jones et M.A.Clem. (31 Jan. 2002); Acianthus R.Br. subgen. Univiscidiatus Kores, Allertonia 7(30: 148 (1995); Univiscidiatus (Kores) Szlach., Polish Bot. J. 46(1): 20 (2001), nom. inval.; Acianthus R.Br. subgen. Univiscidiatus Kores sect. Univiscidiatus Kores, Allertonia 7 (3): 163 (Nov. 1995), nom. inval. Type species: Acianthus elegans Rchb.f. Acianthella amplexicaulis (F.M.Bailey) D.L.Jones et M.A.Clem., Orchadian 14(7): 331 (Mar 2004). Basionym: Microstylis amplexicaulis F.M.Bailey, Bot. Bull. Dept. Agric. Queensland 3: 18 (1891); Listera amplexicaulis (F.M.Bailey) F.M.Bailey, Queensl. fl. 5: 1560 (1902); Acianthus amplexicaulis (F.M.Bailey) Rolfe, Orchid Rev. 11: 344 (1903); Acianthopsis amplexicaulis (F.M.Bailey) Szlach., Polish Bot. J. 46(2): 143 (31 Dec. 2001 [June 2002]), nom. illeg. Type: ‘Eudlo, Queensland’, May 1891, F.M.Bailey s.n. (holo BRI!). Dist: Nnc, Qmo. Acianthella sublestus (Dockrill) D.L.Jones et M.A.Clem., Orchadian 14(7): 331 (Mar 2004). Basionym: Acianthus sublestus Dockrill, North Queensland Naturalist 23(110): 3, f. (1956); Acianthopsis sublestus (Dockrill) Szlach., Richardiana 3(2): 97 (June 2003). Type: Ravenshoe district, North Queensland, 16 Apr.1954, W.W.Abell and W.G.McPherson s.n. (holo NSW!). Dist: Qks, Qkn, Qco. ACIANTHOPSIS Acianthopsis Szlach., Polish Bot. J. 46(2): 143 (31 Dec 2001 [June 2002]), nom. illeg., non D.L.Jones et M.A.Clem. (31 Jan. 2002); Acianthus R.Br. subgen. Univiscidiatus Kores, Allertonia 7(30: 148 (1995); Univiscidiatus (Kores) Szlach., Polish Bot. J. 46(1): 20 (2001), nom. inval.; Acianthus R.Br. subgen. Univiscidiatus Kores sect. Univiscidiatus Kores, Allertonia 7 (3): 163 (Nov. 1995), nom. inval. Type species: Acianthus elegans Rchb.f. Acianthopsis amplexicaulis (F.M.Bailey) Szlach. = Acianthella amplexicaulis Acianthopsis sublestus (Dockrill) Szlach. = Acianthella sublestus ACIANTHUS Acianthus R.Br., Prod. 321 (1810). Type species: Acianthus exsertus R.Br., fide (Hallé 1977). Acianthus R.Br. subgen. Acianthus sect. Acianthus, Allertonia 7(30: 148 (1995). Acianthus R.Br. subgen. Acianthus sect. Caudatus Kores = Nemacianthus Acianthus R.Br. subgen. Acianthus sect. Cyrtostylis (R.Br.) Kores = Cyrtostylis Acianthus R.Br. subgen. Univiscidiatus Kores sect. Univiscidiatus Kores = Acianthopsis ≡Acianthella Acianthus amplexicaulis (F.M.Bailey) Rolfe = Acianthella amplexicaulis Acianthus apprimus D.L.Jones, Austral. Orch. Res. 2: 5, t., f. 2 (1991). Type: ‘New South Wales; Chimney House Reserve, Mt. Wilson, Blue Mountains, 33o31’S, 150o24’E’, 17 Feb.1990, D.L.Jones 5655 and B.E.Jones (holo CANB!; iso AD!, BRI!, CANB!, MEL!, NSW!). Dist: Nct. Acianthus bifolius R.Br. = Chiloglottis reflexa Acianthus borealis D.L.Jones, Austral. Orch. Res. 2: 5-6, t., f. 3 (1991). Type: ‘Queensland; Cook District; Moomin, Atherton Tableland, 17o22’S, 145o25’E, 1030m’, 2 May1988, L.Lawler 9 (holo CANB!; iso BRI!, CANB!). Dist: Qle, Qks, Qkn, Qco. Acianthus brunonis F.Muell., Fragm. 5: 96 (1865), nom. illeg. Notes: Mueller used the name in reference to both A. fornicatus and A. exsertus. Acianthus caudatus R.Br. = Nemacianthus caudatus Acianthus caudatus R.Br. var. ater Lindl. = Nemacianthus caudatus Acianthus caudatus R.Br. var. pallidus Rupp = Nemacianthus caudatus Acianthus collinus D.L.Jones, Austral. Orch. Res. 2: 6-7, t., f. 4 (1991). Type: ‘New South Wales; Conimbla National Park, 33o46’S, 148o25’E’, 10 July1988, D.L.Jones 2704 and M.A.Clements (holo CANB!; iso AD!, BRI!, MEL!, NSW!). Dist: Ncc, Nct, Nnc, Nst. Acianthus exiguus D.L.Jones, Austral. Orch. Res. 2: 7, t., f. 5 (1991). Type: ‘New South Wales; Coolgardie Rd., Wardell, 28o57’S, 153o28’E’, 19 May 1987, D.L.Jones 2550 and J.Moye (holo CANB!; iso CANB!, NSW!). Dist: Nnc. Acianthus exsertus R.Br., Prod. 321 (1810); Epipactis exserta (R.Br.) Poiret, Encyl. Suppl. 2: 571 (1812). Types: ‘(J) v.v.’ [Port Jackson; North Rocks, May 1804, R.Brown s.n.] (lectotype specimen (1) BM!; isolectotype BM!), fide Clements (1989); Syntypes: ‘(J) v.v.’ [Vicinity Sydney, 1804, F.Bauer s.n.] (BM!, K!, L!, P!, W!); [North Rocks, 1802, G.Caley s.n.] (BM!); [North Brush, Apr. 1805, R.Brown s.n.] (AD!, BM!); [Near Askin’s Basin, May 1805, R.Brown s.n.] (BM!). Dist: Veh, Vgi, Nsc, Nst, Can, Nss, Ncc, Nct, Nnc, Nnt, Qmo, Qdd, Qbn, Qle. Acianthus fornicatus R.Br., Prod. 321 (1810); Epipactis fornicata (R.Br.) Poiret, Encyl. Suppl. 2: 571 (1812). Types: ‘(J) v.v.’ [Port Jackson, May 1802, R.Brown s.n.] (lectotype specimen (a) BM!; isolectotype AD!, LE!, K!, P!, W!), fide Clements (1989); Syntypes: ‘(J) v.v.’ [Port Jackson, 1803, R.Brown s.n.] (AD!, BM!, E!, K!, L!, LE!). Dist: Nsc, Ncc, Nct, Ncs, Nnc, Nnt, Qmo, Qdd, Qwb, Qpc, Qks, Qkn. Acianthus huegelii (Endl.) Nicholls et Goadby = Cyrtostylis huegelii. Acianthus ledwardii Rupp, Queensland Naturalist 10: 113, t. (1938). Type: ‘Burleigh Heads, South Queensland’, June 1934, C.P.Ledward s.n.
Recommended publications
  • The Diversity of Wild Orchids in the Southern Slope of Mount Merapi, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Eight Years After the 2010 Eruption
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 21, Number 9, September 2020 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 4457-4465 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210964 The diversity of wild orchids in the southern slope of Mount Merapi, Yogyakarta, Indonesia eight years after the 2010 eruption FEBRI YUDA KURNIAWAN1,2,♥, FAUZANA PUTRI2,3, AHMAD SUYOKO2,3, HIMAWAN MASYHURI2,3, MAYA PURQI SULISTIANINGRUM2,3, ENDANG SEMIARTI3,♥♥ 1Postgraduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Teknika Utara, Sleman 55281, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Tel./fax. +62-274-544975, email: [email protected] 2Biology Orchid Study Club (BiOSC), Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Teknika Selatan, Sekip Utara, Sleman 55281, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 3Department of Tropical Biology, Faculty of Biology, Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jl. Teknika Selatan, Sekip Utara, Sleman 55281, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Tel./fax.: +62-274-580839, email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 21 August 2020. Revision accepted: 31 August 2020. Abstract. Kurniawan FY, Putri F, Suyoko A, Masyhuri H, Sulistianingrum MP, Semiarti E. 2020. The diversity of wild orchids in the southern slope of Mount Merapi, Yogyakarta, Indonesia eight years after the 2010 eruption. Biodiversitas 21: 4457-4465. The ecosystem of the slopes of Mount Merapi is mountain tropical forest which is frequently affected by volcanic activities. The dynamics of the volcano affect the diversity and abundance of orchids in the ecosystem. Tritis is an area included in the Turgo Hill of the southern slope of Mount Merapi and is under the management of Mount Merapi National Park. The ecosystem in Tritis area classified as lower mountain forest and it has been affected by Mount Merapi eruption. This study aimed to do an inventory of orchid species in Tritis to know the diversity and abundance of orchids that exist in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Discyphus Scopulariae
    Phytotaxa 173 (2): 127–139 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.173.2.3 Phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus scopulariae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae) inferred from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences: evidence supporting recognition of a new subtribe, Discyphinae GERARDO A. SALAZAR1, CÁSSIO VAN DEN BERG2 & ALEX POPOVKIN3 1Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-367, 04510 México, Distrito Federal, México; E-mail: [email protected] 2Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Av. Transnordestina s.n., 44036-900, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil 3Fazenda Rio do Negro, Entre Rios, Bahia, Brazil Abstract The monospecific genus Discyphus, previously considered a member of Spiranthinae (Orchidoideae: Cranichideae), displays both vegetative and floral morphological peculiarities that are out of place in that subtribe. These include a single, sessile, cordate leaf that clasps the base of the inflorescence and lies flat on the substrate, petals that are long-decurrent on the column, labellum margins free from sides of the column and a column provided with two separate, cup-shaped stigmatic areas. Because of its morphological uniqueness, the phylogenetic relationships of Discyphus have been considered obscure. In this study, we analyse nucleotide sequences of plastid and nuclear DNA under maximum parsimony
    [Show full text]
  • Abelmoschus Moschatus Subsp
    Cooktown Botanic Gardens Index Plantarum 2011 Family Published Taxon Name Plate No Acanthaceae Eranthemum pulchellum Andrews 720 Acanthaceae Graptophyllum excelsum (F.Meull.) Druce 515 Acanthaceae Graptophyllum spinigerum (F.Meull.) 437 Acanthaceae Megaskepasma erythrochlamys Lindau 107 Acanthaceae Pseuderanthemum variabile (R.Br.) Radlk. 357 Adiantaceae Adiantum formosum R.Br. 761 Adiantaceae Adiantum hispidulum Sw. 762 Adiantaceae Adiantum philippense L. 765 Adiantaceae Adiantum silvaticum Tindale 763 Adiantaceae Adiantum Walsh River 764 Agavaceae Beaucarnea recurvata Lem. 399 Agavaceae Furcraea foetida (L.) Haw. 637 Agavaceae Furcraea gigantea (L.) Haw. 049 Agavaceae Yucca elephantipes Hort.ex Regel 388 Agavaceae Agave sisalana Perrine. 159 Amarylidaceae Scadoxus Raf. sp 663 Amaryllidacea, Crinum angustifolium R.Br. 536 Liliaceae Amaryllidacea, Crinum asiaticum var. procerum (Herb. et Carey) Baker 417 Liliaceae Amaryllidacea, Crinum pedunculatum R.Br. 265 Liliaceae Amaryllidacea, Crinum uniflorum F.Muell. 161 Liliaceae Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis Salisb. americanus 046 Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis Salisb. peruvianna 045 Amaryllidaceae Proiphys amboinensis (L.) Herb. 041 Anacardiaceae Anacardium occidentale L. 051 Anacardiaceae Buchanania arborescens (Blume) Blume. 022 Anacardiaceae Euroschinus falcatus Hook.f. var. falcatus 429 Anacardiaceae Mangifera indica L. 009 Anacardiaceae Pleiogynium timorense (DC.) Leenh. 029 Anacardiaceae Semecarpus australiensis Engl. 368 Annonaceae Annona muricata L. 054 Annonaceae Annona reticulata L. 053 Annonaceae Annona squamosa 602 Annonaceae Cananga odorata (Lam.) Hook.f.&Thomson 406 Annonaceae Melodorum leichhardtii (F.Muell.) Diels. 360 Annonaceae Rollinia deliciosa Saff. 098 Apiaceae Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. 570 Apocynaceae Adenium obesum (Forssk.) Roem. & Schult. 489 Apocynaceae Allamanda cathartica L. 047 Apocynaceae Allamanda violacea Gardn. & Field. 048 Apocynaceae Alstonia actinophylla (A.Cunn.) K.Schum. 026 Apocynaceae Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. 012 Apocynaceae Alyxia ruscifolia R.Br.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report
    Cairns Regional Council Water and Waste Report for Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report November 2009 Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Scope 1 1.3 Project Study Area 2 2. Methodology 4 2.1 Background and Approach 4 2.2 Demarcation of the Aquifer Study Area 4 2.3 Field Investigation of Proposed Bore Hole Sites 5 2.4 Overview of Ecological Values Descriptions 5 2.5 PER Guidelines 5 2.6 Desktop and Database Assessments 7 3. Database Searches and Survey Results 11 3.1 Information Sources 11 3.2 Species of National Environmental Significance 11 3.3 Queensland Species of Conservation Significance 18 3.4 Pest Species 22 3.5 Vegetation Communities 24 3.6 Regional Ecosystem Types and Integrity 28 3.7 Aquatic Values 31 3.8 World Heritage Values 53 3.9 Results of Field Investigation of Proposed Bore Hole Sites 54 4. References 61 Table Index Table 1: Summary of NES Matters Protected under Part 3 of the EPBC Act 5 Table 2 Summary of World Heritage Values within/adjacent Aquifer Area of Influence 6 Table 3: Species of NES Identified as Occurring within the Study Area 11 Table 4: Summary of Regional Ecosystems and Groundwater Dependencies 26 42/15610/100421 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report Table 5: Freshwater Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 36 Table 6: Estuarine Fish Species in the Mulgrave River 50 Table 7: Description of potential borehole field in Aloomba as of 20th August, 2009. 55 Figure Index Figure 1: Regional Ecosystem Conservation Status and Protected Species Observation 21 Figure 2: Vegetation Communities and Groundwater Dependencies 30 Figure 3: Locations of Study Sites 54 Appendices A Database Searches 42/15610/100421 Mulgrave River Aquifer Feasibility Study Flora and Fauna Report 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Floral Synomone Diversification of Sibling Bulbophyllum Species
    Floral synomone diversification of sibling Bulbophyllum Title species (Orchidaceae) in attracting fruit fly pollinators Nakahira, Masataka; Ono, Hajime; Wee, Suk Ling; Tan, Keng Author(s) Hong; Nishida, Ritsuo Citation Biochemical Systematics and Ecology (2018), 81: 86-95 Issue Date 2018-12 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/235528 © 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.; The full- text file will be made open to the public on 01 December 2019 Right in accordance with publisher's 'Terms and Conditions for Self- Archiving'.; This is not the published version. Please cite only the published version. この論文は出版社版でありません。 引用の際には出版社版をご確認ご利用ください。 Type Journal Article Textversion author Kyoto University Floral Synomone Diversification of Bulbophyllum Sibling Species (Orchidaceae) in Attracting Fruit Fly Pollinators Masataka Nakahiraa · Hajime Onoa · Suk Ling Weeb,c · Keng Hong Tand · Ritsuo Nishidaa, * *Corresponding author Ritsuo Nishida [email protected] a Laboratory of Chemical Ecology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606- 8502, Japan b School of Environmental and Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia c Centre for Insect Systematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia d Tan Hak Heng Co., Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia 1 Abstract Floral scent is one of the crucial cues to attract specific groups of insect pollinators in angiosperms. We examined the semiochemical diversity in the interactions between “fruit fly orchids” and their pollinator fruit fly species in two genera, Bactrocera and Zeugodacus (Tephritidae: Diptera).
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification
    --------- -- ---------· 4 CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF SELECTED LITERATURE AND EPIPHYTE CLASSIFICATION 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Literature (p. 5) Several important aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology that are not investigated as part of this work, are reviewed, particularly those published on more. recently. 1.2 Epiphyte Classification and Terminology (p.11) is reviewed and the system used here is outlined and defined. A glossary of terms, as used here, is given. 5 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Li.terature Since the main works of Schimper were published (1884, 1888, 1898), particularly Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas (1888), many workers have written on many aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology. Most of these will not be reviewed here because they are not directly relevant to the present study or have been effectively reviewed by others. A few papers that are keys to the earlier literature will be mentioned but most of the review will deal with topics that have not been reviewed separately within the chapters of this project where relevant (i.e. epiphyte classification and terminology, aspects of epiphyte synecology and CAM in the epiphyt~s). Reviewed here are some special problems of epiphytes, particularly water and mineral availability, uptake and cycling, general nutritional strategies and matters related to these. Also, all Australian works of any substance on vascular epiphytes are briefly discussed. some key earlier papers include that of Pessin (1925), an autecology of an epiphytic fern, which investigated a number of factors specifically related to epiphytism; he also reviewed more than 20 papers written from the early 1880 1 s onwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Connecting Plants and People
    THE NEWSLEttER OF THE SINGAPORE BOTANIC GARDENS VOLUME 34, JANUARY 2010 ISSN 0219-1688 of connecting plants and people p13 Collecting & conserving Thai Convolvulaceae p2 Sowing the seeds of conservation in an oil palm plantation p8 Spindle gingers – jewels of Singapores forests p24 VOLUME 34, JANUARY 2010 Message from the director Chin See Chung ARTICLES 2 Collecting & conserving Thai Convolvulaceae George Staples 6 Spotlight on research: a PhD project on Convolvulaceae George Staples 8 Sowing the seeds of conservation in an oil palm plantation Paul Leong, Serena Lee 12 Propagation of a very rare orchid, Khoo-Woon Mui Hwang, Lim-Ho Chee Len Robiquetia spathulata Whang Lay Keng, Ali bin Ibrahim 150 years of connecting plants and people: Terri Oh 2 13 The making of stars Two minds, one theory - Wallace & Darwin, the two faces of evolution theory I do! I do! I do! One evening, two stellar performances In Search of Gingers Botanical diplomacy The art of botanical painting Fugitives fleurs: a unique perspective on floral fragments Falling in love Born in the Gardens A garden dialogue - Reminiscences of the Gardens 8 Children celebrate! Botanical party Of saints, ships and suspense Birthday wishes for the Gardens REGULAR FEATURES Around the Gardens 21 Convolvulaceae taxonomic workshop George Staples What’s Blooming 18 22 Upside down or right side up? The baobab tree Nura Abdul Karim Ginger and its Allies 24 Spindle gingers – jewels of Singapores forests Jana Leong-Škornicková From Education Outreach 26 “The Green Sheep” – a first for babies and toddlers at JBCG Janice Yau 27 International volunteers at the Jacob Ballas Children’s Garden Winnie Wong, Janice Yau From Taxonomy Corner 28 The puzzling bathroom bubbles plant..
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of West Malesian Agrostophyllum Blume (Orchidaceae)
    Taiwania, 57(3): 251-262, 2012 Studies of West Malesian Agrostophyllum Blume (Orchidaceae) Paul Ormerod P.O. Box 8210, Cairns 4870, Queensland, Australia. Email: [email protected] (Manuscript received 6 March 2012; accepted 20 March 2012) ABSTRACT: Studies of West Malesian material of the genus Agrostophyllum reveals that three previously described species should be treated as new synonyms of earlier named entities, namely A. arundinaceum Ridl. (= A. cyathiforme J.J.Sm.), A. mearnsii Ames (= A. globiceps Schltr.) and A. wenzelii Ames (= A. glumaceum Hook.f.). However A. formosanum Rolfe is found to be a good species, distinct from A. inocephalum (Schauer) Rchb.f. On the other hand five new taxa have been recognised and are proposed here, namely A. asahanense, A. boeeanum, A. galeandrae, A. maliauense and A. pseudolaxum. KEY WORDS: Malesia, Agrostophyllum, new species. INTRODUCTION (Holotype: AMES!). The genus Agrostophyllum Blume currently Affinis A. djaratense Schltr. sed sepalis brevioribus contains about 102 species (new taxa included) (2.75-3.80 vs. 5 mm), epichilo ovato-suborbicularis, distributed from the Seychelles to Samoa. New Guinea bipulvinatis et angustioribus (non cordatis, excavatis et is the centre of diversity with about 57 named taxa, 4.5 vs. 1.75-2.00 mm latis) differt. though my own studies indicate another 20 (including five infraspecific taxa) require description from that Roots and rhizome not seen. Stem terete basally, island. In West Malesia [Malaysia, Western Indonesia compressed above, upper half sublaxly leafy, 66.3 cm (Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan), Brunei and the long, 0.3 cm thick basally, 1.0-1.2 cm wide across Philippines] there are about 28 accepted taxa, to which upper sheaths.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phenology of Plants in the Humid Tropics
    The Phenology of Plants in the Humid Tropics P. R. WYCHERLEY1 Abstract Meteorological phenomena (as indicated by cloudiness and hours of bright sunshine) reinforce or modify the relatively small differences in daylength which result from astronomical conditions. Examples of photoperiodism are discussed in relation to this. The 'storm' stimulus (fast-falling temperature and/or breaking of water stress) stimulates anthesis in representatives of several families of flowering plants. The flowering of evergreen forest trees (e.g. Dipterocarpaceae) at irregular intervals is attributed to preceding periods with large diurnal temperature ranges and high maximum temperatures in­ dicating high insolation (which is probably the main inductive factor, because of consequent bio­ chemical conditions associated with accumulation of assimilates and high carbohydrate status). Such flowering is thus not attributed to drought. Flowering in many deciduous trees follows leaf-fall and/or new leaf appearance. Floral initiation may occur during a period when the tree bears only senescent leaves. Leaf abscission, and thus subsequent emergence of new leaves and flowers, appears to be a response to drought. Susceptibility to dry periods in particular seasons, more than in others, may be due to lack of response by new leaves not yet 'hardened' which results in an insensitive period, followed by a phase in which senescence is accelerated by photoperiodic conditions. In this last phase the foliage is sensitized. Following the discovery of vernalization by the chilling of germinating seed (Gassner, 1918) and of photoperiodism or the effect of daylength (Garner and Allard, 1920), the environmental stimuli operative in many flowering plants of the temperate regions have become evident.
    [Show full text]
  • EIS MEWF Vol 3 App16
    Mount Emerald Wind Farm, Herberton Range North Queensland Environmental Impact Statement Volume 3 Appendix 16 Mount Emerald Wind Farm Flora Report (R72444) Prepared by RPS PR100246 / R72894; Volume 3 – Final November 2014 Mount Emerald Wind Farm Flora Report Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS AUSTRALIA EAST PTY LTD RATCH AUSTRALIA CORPORATION LIMITED 135 Abbott Street PO Box 1949 Level 4 CAIRNS QLD 4870 231 George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 T: +61 4031 1336 F: +61 4031 29142 T: +61 7 3214 36400 E: [email protected] F: +61 2 8913 9423 E: Client Manager: Mellissa Jess W: www.ratchaustralia.com Report Number: PR100246-1 / R72444 Version / Date: Draft September 2013 rpsgroup.com.au Mount Emerald Wind Farm Flora Report IMPORTANT NOTE Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this report, its attachments or appendices may be reproduced by any process without the written consent of RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. All enquiries should be directed to RPS Australia East Pty Ltd. We have prepared this report for the sole purposes of RATCH Australia Corporation Limited (“Client”) for the specific purpose of only for which it is supplied (“Purpose”). This report is strictly limited to the purpose and the facts and matters stated in it and does not apply directly or indirectly and will not be used for any other application, purpose, use or matter. In preparing this report we have made certain assumptions. We have assumed that all information and documents provided to us by the Client or as a result of a specific request or enquiry were complete, accurate and up-to-date.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc
    Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. Journal Diuris calcicola One of new orchid species named in 2015 Photo: R. Bates June 2016 Volume 40 No. 5 Native Orchid Society of South Australia June 2016 Vol. 40 No. 5 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through preservation of natural habitat and cultivation. Except with the documented official representation of the management committee, no person may represent the Society on any matter. All native President orchids are protected in the wild; their collection without written Vacant Government permit is illegal. Vice President Robert Lawrence Contents Email: [email protected] Title Author Page Secretary Bulletin Board 54 Rosalie Lawrence Vice President’s Report Robert Lawrence 55 Email:[email protected] May Field Trip – From a newbie Vicki Morris 56 Treasurer NOSSA Seed Kits 2016 Les Nesbitt 57 Christine Robertson The Orchid & Mycorrhiza Fungus… Rob Soergel 57 Email: [email protected] Editor Growing Exercise Recall Les Nesbitt 58 Lorraine Badger Diuris Project Report Les Nesbitt 58 Assistant Editor - Rob Soergel May Meeting Review Rob Soergel 58 Email: [email protected] Pterostylis - Reprint 59 Committee Letters to the editor 60 Michael Clark May Orchid Pictures Competition Rosalie Lawrence 62 Bob Bates April Benched Orchids Results Les Nesbitt 63 Kris Kopicki April Benched Orchids Photos Judy & Greg Sara 64 Other Positions Membership Liaison Officer Life Members Robert Lawrence Mr R Hargreaves† Mr G Carne Mrs T Bridle Ph: 8294 8014 Email:[email protected] Mr H Goldsack† Mr R Bates Botanical Advisor Mr R Robjohns† Mr R Shooter Bob Bates Mr J Simmons† Mr W Dear Conservation Officer Mr D Wells† Mrs C Houston Thelma Bridle Ph: 8384 4174 Mr L Nesbitt Mr D Hirst Field Trips Coordinator Michael Clark Patron: Mr L.
    [Show full text]