DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Acoustic Properties of Mongolian Language

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Acoustic Properties of Mongolian Language AN INTRODUCTION TO MONGOLIAN PHONETIC-LINGUISTIC MODEL: ON THE ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF MONGOLIAN LANGUAGE ¡ Idomuso Dawa , Shigeki Okawa and Katsuhiko Shirai ¢ Dept. of Information and Computer Science, Waseda University, Japan ¢£¢ Dept. of Network Science, Chiba Institute of Technology, Japan ABSTRACT Pandita in 1648. (c) Cyrillic scripts, created from Russian orthographic characters in 1940’s, have been widely used in This paper proposes a multi-lingual phonetic-linguistic mod- Mongolia, Kalmyk A. R. in Russia. el for Mongolian language based on the study of the In the script (a), allophones sometimes correspond to classification and the postulates of such models. This the same characters as well as the contrary case. In many model is commonly applicable for various fields as linguis- cases, a word form is quite different from the pronunciations tic/phonetic/dialectal/ language educational studies as well in these days. On the contrary, (b) Todo scripts were created as speech recognition. Its application to major dialects of based on a rule that one character corresponds to only one Mongolian has marked 91 % on word level recognition. pronunciation. Additionally, the letters have special marks In this paper, therefore, we first introduce the structure of for the long vowels etc. Todo scripts avoid the vagueness in language and classification of Mongolian dialectal speech. writing and speaking in initial Mongolian, as “Todo” means Next, we analyze and classify fundamental characteristics the clearness by Mongolian. in order to define phoneme labels. Lastly, we apply the common models to a simple word recognition experiment. ¤ (a) word ¤ (b) word written spoken written spoken 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 -- n n Mongolian language, one of the most spoken Asian lan- n n n o u u u guages, is mainly used by Mongolian people resided in g g o- o G G the Central Asia and spoken by about 7.5 million people. o u u u s s s s Because of its historical and geographical backgrounds, the s u u u u Mongolian language has several classes of dialects. Al- writing direction n n though the language structure of each dialect is roughly equivalent, spoken Mongolian dialects are not usually in- line feed telligible to each other, and there exists a large discrepancy between articulation and orthography. Within recent net- Figure 1: Word samples written by (a) and (b) scripts. worked computing environments a intelligent models must be established towards developing digitalized facilities for Mongolian languages. written 1.1 Structure of Mongolian Languages spoken g a r ja Mongolian language has several dialectal variations in its phonetic and graphic systems because of the above reasons. Currently, there are three different graphic systems. (a) Figure 2: Word sample written by (c) scripts. Mongolian scripts (also known as initial Mongolian or Hudom scripts), originated in Uygur scripts, are used to Scripts (a) and (b) are written vertically from top to express Mongolian languages in Genghis Khan era of the bottom, and lines feed from left to right. Each phonetic thirteenth Century. (b) Todo scripts, which are improved character changes its shape according to its position with- and created according to scripts (a) in order to correspond in a word (initial, medial and final forms) and there are to the West Mongolian pronunciations by a Lama ZA-ya page 1657 ICPhS99 San Francisco 1 complicated writing conventions for grammatical endings pact phonetic symbols are desired. The IPA (International and a large amount of “historical” orthographic manners Phonetic Alphabet) or Worldbet are good examples of such particularly for the traditional script (a). Fig. 1, 2 show the symbols. Especially for the Mongolian speech, it should word samples by scripts (a), (b) and (c). be considered each dialectal characteristics which could be used commonly. There are, however, some phonetic sym- 1.2 Dialectal Groups bols that are difficult to determine their acoustic differences by linguistic knowledge. Therefore, it is desired to classify The spoken dialects of Mongolian are very various and phonemes by means of spectral and temporal difference. categorized into several groups. Their common characters Thus, we have obtained several unique peculiarities of are completed and proposed by Sh. Lobsan Bandan who Mongolian speech, which are in common for each dialect. was the first Mongolian linguist, based on linguistics in his We itemize them as following with the definition of our paper [4] (see Table 1. In this study, we define two major phoneme label symbols. dialectal groups (A) and (B), according to the using manner and the regions [1]. Table 2 gives the population and the script for the newly defined groups. 2.1 Vowels Though people usually say Mongolian has seven vowels, Table 1: Dialectal groups of Mongolian. practically there are nine fundamental vowels in spoken mode by means of a dialectal difference, as /a/, /e/, / ¦ /, /i/, Speech Dialect Using ¨ /o/, /u/, / § /, / /. group name regions Torugut Xinjiang, CN Hoshuto – 1. vowel /e/: Western Oirodu – A vowel /e/ appears quite frequently in both (A) and Chahar – (B) groups. Fig. 3 shows the LPC spectrum for Kalmyik Kalmyik, A. R. the same time period. Since there are two different Halkha Mongolia acoustic features, we defined two label symbols / ¦ / in Middle Chahar Inner Mongolia, CN (A) and /e/ in (B) groups. For example, words “eeji” Ordos – is pronounced as “ ¦©¦ ji” in group (A) and as “eeji” in Northern Buirat Mongolia, CN group (B). 8.0 8.0 Vowel /e/ (A) Vowel /e/ (B) Table 2: Dialectal groups in our system. 6.0 6.0 Speech Dialect Rate Script group group name % (a) (b) (c) 4.0 4.0 ¥ Halha 87 ¥ 2.0 2.0 (A) Chahar 83.7 ¥ ¥ Ordos ¥ [kHz] [kHz] ¥ Kalmyk 86 ¥ 0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 0.0 1.5 3.0 4.5 6.0 (B) Oirat 87.3 ¥ Figure 3: LPC spectrum for vowel /e/. 2 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PHONEMIC 2. phoneme /ai/: PECULIAR IN MONGOLIAN There is a specific vowel which is usually written In this section, we mention some results of the qualitative “ai” in speech groups (A) and (B). Fig. 4 shows the analysis of Mongolian speech in order to give a guideline to spectrogram of a word “ainai” which includes symbol build phonemic labels which would be useful in this system. “ai”. There is a visible pattern of a diphthong in Unlike major languages such as English or Japanese, it is group (A) and stationary segments with clear formant still under the advancement to systematize Mongolian pho- appearance of a typical vowel in group (B). We use a netic characteristics. This is why we consider this kind of symbol /I/ for “ai” in written scripts (a) and (b). The analysis is important. In digital speech processing such as pronunciation of /I/ is similar to [æ] in English word automatic speech recognition, generally explicit and com- “cat.” Since the final shape of a vowel /i/ in Todo page 1658 ICPhS99 San Francisco (A) (B) F2 /a i n a/ /a i n a/ i 2000 F3 1600 e F2 a 1200 F1 θ o u 800 u Figure 4: Spectrogram of a word “ainai” which includes a phoneme /ai/ in (A), (B) groups. 300 400 500 600 700 F1 Figure 6: 1 2 distribution of seven vowels in (A). / o / / u / / o’ / / u, / Initial F2 i e 2000 Medial θ 1600 u a Final 1200 o u 800 Figure 5: Examples of allophones corresponding same 300 400 500 600 700 F1 characters in speech group (A). Figure 7: 1 2 distribution of seven vowels in (B). scripts is usually written as “i” and pronounced as [æ], we make a distinction between /i/ and /I/. 3. Allophones vowels: In the group (A), some characters correspond to several different pronunciations. Referring for the original ! dialectal scripts, we use some new symbols. For example, symbols /o’/ and /u,/ depend the expression # " in group (B), which are not separated in group (A). (see Fig. 5) $ The typical formant distribution of the vowels, present- ed in our former studies [5], are shown in Fig. 6 and 7. As § ¨ shown in Fig. 6, the vowels /u/, / /, / / have a difficulty to $ ! classify by frequencies F and F . 1 2 $ & # % " $ & 2.2 Consonants % There are about 27 basic consonants in each dialect of Mongolian language, and in several cases, one phonetic Figure 8: Definition of consonants /g/, /h/ and /k/ in (A), symbol corresponds to different characters. Based on the (B) speech groups. following analyses, we define 56 phonetic label symbols. page 1659 ICPhS99 San Francisco 1. The glottis phonemes: Consonants /g/, /h/ and /k/ in (a), (b) and (c) are Table 3: Result of word recognition. classified and defined in our system as Fig. 8. Dialect Test Rec. Accuracy 2. Position in a word: Group Speaker (1) (2) Some consonants have different acoustic characteristics nam 81.91 85.32 as well as the shape within a word. Fig 9 shows (A) bolm 83.62 83.62 nrm 77.82 77.82 a spectrogram of word /s:is:/ which includes same Average 81.11 82.25 phoneme /s:/. pvm 91.08 86.01 Since there is no corresponding phonetic symbol in (B) Olm 85.32 85.98 the IPA, we adopt special symbols as their capital bsm 79.52 81.87 letters and some new symbols, considering the original Average 85.31 84.62 dialectal scripts and the acoustic differences. The other symbols from the same ideas include /N/, /B/, /G/, /M/, 4 CONCLUSION /L/, /S/, /D/, /R/, /S:/, /:h/, /s:/, /x˜/ and /N’/. In this paper, we have introduced the first attempt of classi- fying and defining common models for Mongolian dialects in order to use widely in linguistic, phonetic, dialectal, and educational research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Vocabulary of Inanimate Nature As a Part of Turkic-Mongolian Language Commonness
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 6 S2 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy November 2015 The Vocabulary of Inanimate Nature as a Part of Turkic-Mongolian Language Commonness Valentin Ivanovich Rassadin Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor, Department of the Kalmyk language and Mongolian studies Director of the Mongolian and Altaistic research Scientific centre, Kalmyk State University 358000, Republic of Kalmykia, Elista, Pushkin street, 11 Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p126 Abstract The article deals with the problem of commonness of Turkic and Mongolian languages in the area of vocabulary; a layer of vocabulary, reflecting the inanimate nature, is subject to thorough analysis. This thematic group studies the rubrics, devoted to landscape vocabulary, different soil types, water bodies, atmospheric phenomena, celestial sphere. The material, mainly from Khalkha-Mongolian and Old Written Mongolian languages is subject to the analysis; the data from Buryat and Kalmyk languages were also included, as they were presented in these languages. The Buryat material was mainly closer to the Khalkha-Mongolian one. For comparison, the material, mainly from the Old Turkic language, showing the presence of similar words, was included; it testified about the so-called Turkic-Mongolian lexical commonness. The analysis of inner forms of these revealed common lexemes in the majority of cases allowed determining their Turkic origin, proved by wide occurrence of these lexemes in Turkic languages and Turkologists' acknowledgement of their Turkic origin. The presence of great quantity of common vocabulary, which origin is determined as Turkic, testifies about repeated ancient contacts of Mongolian and Turkic languages, taking place in historical retrospective, resulting in hybridization of Mongolian vocabulary.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer School on Mongolian Language and Culture
    National University of Mongolia Summer School Programs 2014 National University of Mongolia Summer school programs 2014 Contents The National University of Mongolia (NUM) Overview of NUM Summer School Description of Programs: Mongolian Language and Culture Anthropology and Archaeology Mining Economy General Information Summer School 2013 Participants’ Impressions How to Apply 1. Gorkhi Terelj 2. Naadam festival 3. Gandan Monastery 4, 5. Umnugovi province, 6. Bogd Khaan’s museum 7. Central stadium(during the Naadam festival) Places to visit during summer school program NUM at glance Since the NUM was established in 1942, it has been the first and leading Institute of Higher Education in Mongolia. Schools: 16 Departments: 95 Centers & Institutes: 34 Total University Staff: 1,580 Undergraduate Students: 18039 Graduate Students: 3872 Cooperation with 114 Institutions from 28 Countries 1 National University of Mongolia Summer School Programs 2014 NUM Summer School 2014 The NUM is pleased to announce expanded program during this year’s Summer School for those interested in Mongolian Studies. Various themes are explored at an advanced academic level through a combination of practical field experience and training. Summer school on Mongolian language and culture Duration: 3 weeks Introduction Students live in a Ger, Mongolian traditional accommodation in historical and beautiful place of Ulaanbaatar’s outskirts. And from an experienced Mongolian language teacher, the students receive language training and learn about Mongolia, no prior experience necessary. Students can experience Mongolian culture first-hand: traditions, religion, and nomadic herding lifestyle, the Mongolian major summer holiday “Naadam”, horse racing, wrestling, archery, production of milk products, national songs and music.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Ethnic Groups in China
    Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page i studies on ethnic groups in china Stevan Harrell, Editor Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page ii studies on ethnic groups in china Cultural Encounters on China’s Ethnic Frontiers Edited by Stevan Harrell Guest People: Hakka Identity in China and Abroad Edited by Nicole Constable Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China Jonathan N. Lipman Lessons in Being Chinese: Minority Education and Ethnic Identity in Southwest China Mette Halskov Hansen Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861–1928 Edward J. M. Rhoads Ways of Being Ethnic in Southwest China Stevan Harrell Governing China’s Multiethnic Frontiers Edited by Morris Rossabi On the Margins of Tibet: Cultural Survival on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier Åshild Kolås and Monika P. Thowsen Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page iii ON THE MARGINS OF TIBET Cultural Survival on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier Åshild Kolås and Monika P. Thowsen UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PRESS Seattle and London Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/7/05 12:47 PM Page iv this publication was supported in part by the donald r. ellegood international publications endowment. Copyright © 2005 by the University of Washington Press Printed in United States of America Designed by Pamela Canell 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 5 4 3 2 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any infor- mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writ- ing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Study of Harmonious Co-Existence in the Multi-Ethnic Culture of Qinghai
    International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology International Journal of (2018) 2:1 Anthropology and Ethnology https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-018-0010-6 R E S E A R C H Open Access Harmony in diversity: an empirical study of harmonious co-existence in the multi-ethnic culture of Qinghai Dorjie Banban Received: 19 April 2018 /Accepted: 25 April 2018 / © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Abstract Finding the key to achieving harmonious co-existence among ethnic groups with different cultural traditions in a multi-ethnic state is a major problem worldwide. Qinghai is located at the intersection of the four major spheres of cultural influence of the nationalities of the Central Plains, Tibet, the Western Regions, and the Northern Grasslands, where multiple cultures co-exist, borrow from each other, seek common ground while reserving differences, thus vividly embodying the coexistence principle of “harmony in diversity.” Based on case studies on the Tibetanisation of the Han nationality, the acculturation towards Tibetan culture and Han culture, and the Islamisation of the Tibetanised Hui people in Qinghai, this paper discusses the connotation of “harmony in diversity” in the context of ethnic relations in Qinghai. The author believes that here the “diversity” indicates that every ethnic group has a stable identity related to its own ethnicity, as well as its important cultural traits, and that this identity is fully respected.
    [Show full text]
  • Postsocialist English and Nationalist Language Identities in Mongolia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by K-State Research Exchange This is the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript as accepted for publication. The publisher-formatted version may be available through the publisher’s web site or your institution’s library. Words, borders, herds: postsocialist English and nationalist language identities in Mongolia Phillip Marzluf How to cite this manuscript If you make reference to this version of the manuscript, use the following information: Marzluf, P. (2012). Words, borders, herds: Postsocialist English and nationalist language identities in Mongolia. Retrieved from http://krex.ksu.edu Published Version Information Citation: Marzluf, P. (2012). Words, borders, herds: Post-socialist English and nationalist language identities in Mongolia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2012(218), 195-216. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1515/ijsl-2012-0064 Publisher’s Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2012-0064 This item was retrieved from the K-State Research Exchange (K-REx), the institutional repository of Kansas State University. K-REx is available at http://krex.ksu.edu Running Head: LANGUAGE IDENTITIES IN MONGOLIA 1 Words, Borders, Herds: Postsocialist English and Nationalist Language Identities in Mongolia LANGUAGE IDENTITIES IN MONGOLIA 2 Abstract This article focuses on the sociolinguistics of globalism (Blommaert 2010) in Mongolia by examining two dominant language identities, postsocialist English and fundamentalist nationalist Mongolian. Postsocialist English, emerging as a vital part of the free-market capitalist economy in the 1990s, is analyzed in relationship with the now receding language identity of socialist Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People's Republic of China
    The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People’s Republic of China, 1949-2009 by Emily Elissa Wilcox A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the University of California, San Francisco in Medical Anthropology of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Xin Liu, Chair Professor Vincanne Adams Professor Alexei Yurchak Professor Michael Nylan Professor Shannon Jackson Spring 2011 Abstract The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People’s Republic of China, 1949-2009 by Emily Elissa Wilcox Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the University of California, San Francisco in Medical Anthropology University of California, Berkeley Professor Xin Liu, Chair Under state socialism in the People’s Republic of China, dancers’ bodies became important sites for the ongoing negotiation of two paradoxes at the heart of the socialist project, both in China and globally. The first is the valorization of physical labor as a path to positive social reform and personal enlightenment. The second is a dialectical approach to epistemology, in which world-knowing is connected to world-making. In both cases, dancers in China found themselves, their bodies, and their work at the center of conflicting ideals, often in which the state upheld, through its policies and standards, what seemed to be conflicting points of view and directions of action. Since they occupy the unusual position of being cultural workers who labor with their bodies, dancers were successively the heroes and the victims in an ever unresolved national debate over the value of mental versus physical labor.
    [Show full text]
  • China - Mongols
    China - Mongols minorityrights.org/minorities/mongols/ June 19, 2015 Profile There are nearly 6 million Mongols in China, mainly concentrated in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (IMAR) on China’s northern border with Mongolia and Russia. With only a few official crossing points, the border between IMAR and Mongolia has been the site of tensions as China has sought to enforce its policies abroad, such as in December 2016 when China temporarily closed a vital border crossing following a visit by the Dalai Lama to Mongolia. The Mongolian language is part of the Mongolic language family, with the majority of speakers in China using the Chahar, Oyirad and Barghu-Buryat dialects. Mongolian written language was adopted some 800 years ago, under Genghis Khan. It is modeled on an older form of vertically written Uyghur script. Most Mongols are Tibetan or Vajrayana Buddhists, though some also maintain shamanist practices. They tend to be concentrated in the northern and central parts of the IMAR, although there are also substantial numbers in Xinjiang, Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, and Yimin provinces. State-sponsored or voluntary Han migration to the IMAR has long since made the Mongols a minority in their own land. Many Mongols still have a close connection with the traditional pastoral nomadism and culture of their ancestors, though this has been weakened in many areas of China, where this lifestyle is under threat from environmental degradation, urbanization and forced urbanization or other governmental pressures. The IMAR is rich in natural resources and open land, which has fuelled successive waves of exploitative land and resource grabs sparking episodes of resistance from ethnic Mongolians and harsh responses from the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Language Diversity Across Cultures: the English-Mongolian Case Study
    International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, vol 6 no 3 & 4, year 2014, http://www.iariajournals.org/life_sciences/ 167 Managing Language Diversity Across Cultures: the English-Mongolian Case Study Amarsanaa Ganbold Feroz Farazi Moaz Reyad School of Information Technology DISI DISI National University of Mongolia University of Trento University of Trento Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Trento, Italy Trento, Italy [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Oyundari Nyamdavaa Fausto Giunchiglia School of Information Technology DISI National University of Mongolia University of Trento Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Trento, Italy [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Developing ontologies from scratch appears to be providing relations and attributes specific to the domain. By very expensive in terms of cost and time required and often reducing polysemy (the amount of words with same such efforts remain unfinished for decades. Ontology meaning), they can enable better semantic interoperability. localization through translation seems to be a promising Ontologies that are developed to perform NLP tasks in one approach towards addressing this issue as it enables the language can hardly be used with their full potential for greater reuse of the ontological (backbone) structure. another. Representing an existing ontology in a new However, during ontology localization, managing language language, taking into account cultural and linguistic diversity across cultures remains as a challenge that has to be diversities, is defined as ontology localization. taken into account and dealt with the right level of attention In this paper, we describe the development of the space and expertise. Furthermore, reliability of the provided ontology in Mongolian starting from its English counterpart knowledge in the localized ontology is appearing as a non- trivial issue to be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration and Separation of 'Language': Language Policies Of
    Integration and Separation of ‘Language’: Language Policies of Mongolian Peoples in the USSR and Mongolia, 1920–1940 ARAI Yukiyasu Introduction To define what is a language is very difficult. There are many aspects that are relevant to this question. One approach is that a particular language is completely different from others. Another is that a language is similar to adjacent languages but still calls itself a language. There are also some cases in the world where there are debates whether a vernacular in discussion is a language or a dialect. In this paper, therefore, I would like to discuss a case of Mongolian peoples where three written ‘languages’ came into being from people who had obscure ethnic boundaries but were united in one written language. There are no studies, which deal with the language policy of all the Mongolian peoples as a whole. But for the whole of the Soviet Union in this period, we can refer to the writings of V.M. Alpatov and M.I. Isaev.1 For other groups of people like Turks, there are a lot of books and papers which deal with the language policy of that group as a whole like Winner, Smith or Şimşir and books on orthographies of Turkic peoples.2 For the creation of alphabets for minority peoples (with populations less than 50,000), a paper by O.A. Kazakevich gives a very useful list that describes which language had (and has) an alphabet, in which script and in which 1 V. M. Al pa t ov, 150 iazykov i politika: 1917–2000 (Moscow 2000); M.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE PHONOLOGY AND MORPHOLOGY OF JUNGAR TUVA Talant Mawkanuli Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, Indiana University December 1999 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook
    Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook Center for the Study of Eurasian Nomads (CSEN) 2016 Educational Field Program CENTRAL MONGOLIAN NOMADS PROJECT Deer stone and slab burial complex, Khentii Province Table of Contents Essential Information…………………………………………………………...2 Program Overview……………………………………………………............2-3 Contact Us………………………………………………………………………3 About CSEN………………………………………………………………….....3 Program……………………………………………………………………...4-22 Senior Staff……………………………………………………………...4 Description……………………………………………………………4-6 Map…………………………………………………………………...…6 Student Requirements……………………………………………...…...7 Schedule…………………………………………………………......8-13 Logistics……………………………………………………………..……..….14 Transportation…………………………………………………...…….14 Visas…………………………………………………………...………14 Ulaanbaatar………………………………………………………...………14-17 In The Field…………………………………………………………...……17-24 Rural Mongolia………………………………………………...………17 Sleeping………………………………………………………...……...18 Climate………………………………………………………......…18-19 Eating & Drinking…………………………………………….....…19-21 Facilities………………………………………………………........21-23 Cultural Differences……………………………………………….23-24 List of Required and Recommended Items……………………………......25-27 Project Bibliography……………………………………………………....28-29 Cancellation Policy…………………………………………………………....29 Application Form…………………………………………………….……30-35 Waiver (Release/Assumption of Risk form)……………………………….....36 Code of Conduct……………………………………………………...…....37-40 1 Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook ESSENTIAL INFORMATION st th Program dates: June 21 to
    [Show full text]
  • 49173-003: Improving Access to Health Services for Disadvantaged
    Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework Document Stage: Draft Project Number: 49173-003 Loan XXXX December 2018 MON: Improving Access to Health Services For Disadvantaged Groups This indigenous peoples planning framework is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 December 2018) Currency unit – togrog (MNT) MNT1.00 = $0.00038 $1.00 = MNT2,612.50 ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank ADF - Asian Development Fund DMF Design and Monitoring Framework EMDP Ethnic Minority Development Plan EMDF Ethnic Minority Development Framework FHC Family Health Center GOM Government of Mongolia LAR Land Acquisition and Resettlement MOF Ministry of Finance MOH Ministry of Health NGO nongovernment organization PIU Project Impleme SHC ntation Unit RRP Report and Recommendation to the President SGAP Social and Gender Action Plan SHC Soum Health Center SPS Safeguard Policy Statement SPRSS Summary Poverty Reduction and Social Strategy TOR Terms of Reference UB CHD Ulaanbaatar City Health Department GLOSSARY aimag - province ger - traditional tent soum - aimag subdistrict WEIGHTS AND MEASURES km - kilometer m - meter cm - centimeter mm - millimeter m2 - square meter m3 - cubic meter M - Mega (Million) MW - megawatt In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.
    [Show full text]